Abstract
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to study the association between neighborhood socio-economic status (SES) at the age of 40 years and risk of stroke before the age of 50 years.
METHODS
All individuals in Sweden were included if their 40th birthday occurred between 1998 and 2010. National registers were used to categorize neighborhood SES into high, middle and low, and to retrieve information on incident ischemic strokes. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox regression.
RESULTS
A total of 1,153,451 adults (women: 48.9%) were included and followed for a mean of 5.5 years (SD 3.5 years); 1777 strokes among men and 1374 strokes among women were recorded. In sex-adjusted models adjustments for marital status, education level, immigrant status, region of residence in Sweden and local services in the neighbourhoods, there was a lower risk of stroke in neighbourhoods with high socio-economic status (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.96), and an increased risk of stroke in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06–1.27), when using those living in middle SES neighbourhoods as referents. After further adjustment for hospital diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and atrial fibrillation prior to the age of 40, the higher risk in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status was attenuated, but remained significant (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.23). The risk estimates were higher in women in sex-stratified models.
CONCLUSIONS
In a nation-wide study, we found that the risk of stroke differed depending on neighbourhood socio-economic status, which calls for increased efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases in deprived neighbourhoods.
Keywords: neighborhood deprivation, epidemiology, national registers, socio-economic status
Introduction
Neighbourhood socio-economic status has been shown to have a profound effect on various health outcomes, and neighbourhood socio-economic status has repeatedly been shown to be a risk factor that is independent on the individual level socio-economic status [1, 2]. There are several studies showing that neighbourhood level socio-economic status is a risk factor for stroke [3–7], but controversy exist with regard to its independence of individual level socio-economic status [4]. Interestingly, ischaemic stroke among young people in Sweden, i.e. in the ages 18–44 years of age, has increased while decreasing in ages 45 years and above [8]. Furthermore, mental ill-health is increasing among teenagers in Sweden, and this has also been linked to a higher incidence of early stroke [9].
Most studies have explored the risks among individuals of all ages [3–7], or in the elderly [10]; studies where data on younger individuals will have a marginal effect on the risk estimates. Yet, interaction between age groups and gender have been reported, and should according to the authors be explored in further detail [6]. Whether neighbourhood socio-economic status has an effect on incident stroke among young individuals is therefore not known.
In the present study, we aimed to explore the relationship between neighbourhood SES and incident stroke in individuals below 50 years; and whether that relationship is independent of individual-level socio-economic factors such as education level, marital status, immigrant status and region in Sweden at the age of 40 years. Data from National Swedish registers enable us to include all individuals in Sweden with nearly complete socio-economic data at their 40th birthday [11], and to follow them for hospitalization due to stroke before the age of 50 years. We hypothesized that the risk of stroke is higher in neighborhoods with lower SES, and lower in neighborhoods with higher SES.
Methods
Data used in this study were retrieved from a national database that contains information on the entire population of Sweden for a period of 40 years. This database is based on several Swedish registers and contains comprehensive nationwide individual-level data and data on neighbourhood SES. The registers used in the present study were the Total Population Register, and the Patient Register. The Swedish nationwide population and health care registers have exceptionally high completeness and validity [9]. Individuals were tracked using the personal identification numbers, which are assigned to each resident of Sweden. These identification numbers were replaced with serial numbers to provide anonymity. The follow-up period ran from January 1, 1998 until hospitalisation/out-patient treatment of stroke at age of diagnosis before 50 years, death, emigration or the end of the study period on December 31, 2010.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Lund, Sweden.
Neighbourhood-level socio-economic status
The home addresses of all Swedish individuals have been coded to small geographic units with boundaries defined by homogeneous types of buildings. These neighbourhood areas, called small area market statistics, or SAMS, each contain an average of 1,000 residents and were created by the Swedish Government-owned statistics bureau Statistics Sweden. SAMS were used as proxies for neighbourhoods, as they were in previous research [12, 13]. Neighbourhood of residence is determined annually using the National Land Survey of Sweden register.
A summary index was calculated to characterise neighbourhood-level deprivation. The neighbourhood index was based on information about female and male residents aged 20 to 64 years because this age group represents those who are among the most socioeconomically active in the population (i.e. a group that has a stronger impact on the socioeconomic structure in the neighbourhood compared to children, younger women and men, and retirees). The neighbourhood index was based on four items: low education level (<10 years of formal education), low income (income from all sources, including interest and dividends, that is <50% of the median individual income), unemployment (excluding full-time students, those completing military service, and early retirees), and receipt of social welfare. The index of the year 2000 was used to categorise neighbourhood deprivation as low (more than one SD below the mean), moderate (within one SD of the mean), and high (more than one SD above the mean) [14]. The neighborhood SES each individual resided in at the age of 40, when the individuals entered the study, was used as exposure in the present study.
Individual level socio-demographic variables
Inclusion:
all individuals in Sweden entered the cohort at their 40th birthday. Individual-level socio-demographic variables of marital status, educational level, and region of residence were defined according to the year of inclusion in the study.
Marital status was categorized as (1) married/cohabitating or (2) never married, (3) widowed, or (4) divorced.
Education levels were categorised as completion of compulsory school or less (≤9 years), practical high school or some theoretical high school (10–12 years) and completion of theoretical high school and/or college (>12 years).
Immigrant status was categorised as born outside Sweden vs. Swedish-born.
Region of residence was included because incidence of MI varies according to urban/rural status. Individuals were classified as living in a large city, a middle-sized town, or a small town/rural area. Large cities were those with a population of ≥200,000 (Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö); middle-sized towns were towns with a population of ≥ 90,000 but <200,000; small towns were towns with a population of ≥ 27,000 and <90,000; and rural areas were areas with populations smaller than those of small towns. We choose to categorize region of residence into big cities, northern Sweden and southern Sweden, yielding three equally-sized groups.
Outcome variable:
The outcome variable in this study included incident ischemic stroke. These were based on discharge diagnoses after a hospital stay or diagnoses at an out-patient visit to a specialist clinic (primary health care not included) of stroke during the study period. Data on in-patient and out-patient diagnoses were retrieved from the Patient Register, which contains information on all hospital stays, and visits to out-patient clinics for specialised care. We searched these two registers for the following International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes: ischemic stroke I63.
Statistical analysis
Person-years were calculated from the start of the follow-up (January 1st 1998) until diagnosis of outcomes before age 50 years, death, emigration, or closing date on December 31st 2010. The rate of hospitalisation for MI and CHD was calculated for the total study population and for each subgroup after assessment of neighbourhood SES of individuals.
Cox regression models were used to estimate hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To determine the crude risks of stroke by level of neighbourhood SES, an unadjusted model (model A) that included only neighbourhood SES was calculated. In the next step a model (model B) was created comprising both neighbourhood SES and individual-level variables. Model B included educational level, marital status, immigrant status and region of residence in Sweden. In model C, we adjusted for the factors in model B and neighbourhood goods and services (fast food restaurants, bars/pubs, physical activity facilities and health care resources). We also performed a secondary analyses, model D, adjusted for all the factors in model C and registered hospital discharge diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and heart failure prior to the age of 40.
The analyses were performed using the SAS statistical package (version 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
Results
A total of 1,153,451 adults (women: 48.9%) living in low, middle and high income neighbourhoods were included and followed for a mean of 5.5 years (SD 3.5 years). Baseline characteristics of study participants are presented in Table 1. Men and women living in high-SES neighbourhoods were more likely to be married, have a higher level of formal education and to be born in Sweden compared to their counterparts living in middle- and low-SES neighbourhoods. In contrast, adults living in low-SES neighbourhoods were more likely to be hospitalized for hypertension and diabetes compared to those living in middle- and high-SES neighbourhoods.
Table 1.
Men (N=589247) |
Women (N=564204) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High (n=112534) |
Middle (n=379186) |
Low (n=97527) |
All |
High (n=115229) |
Middle (n=362309) |
Low (n=86666) |
All |
|||||||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
Year at entry | ||||||||||||||||
1998-2000 | 20230 | 18.0 | 63636 | 16.8 | 19614 | 20.1 | 103480 | 17.6 | 20812 | 18.1 | 61786 | 17.1 | 17164 | 19.8 | 99762 | 17.7 |
2001-2003 | 23861 | 21.2 | 84921 | 22.4 | 22628 | 23.2 | 131410 | 22.3 | 24272 | 21.1 | 80466 | 22.2 | 20055 | 23.1 | 124793 | 22.1 |
2004-2006 | 30870 | 27.4 | 102988 | 27.2 | 24997 | 25.6 | 158855 | 27.0 | 31306 | 27.2 | 97964 | 27.0 | 22501 | 26.0 | 151771 | 26.9 |
2007-2010 | 37573 | 33.4 | 127641 | 33.7 | 30288 | 31.1 | 195502 | 33.2 | 38839 | 33.7 | 122093 | 33.7 | 26946 | 31.1 | 187878 | 33.3 |
Marital status | ||||||||||||||||
Married | 63804 | 56.7 | 163856 | 43.2 | 38405 | 39.4 | 266065 | 45.2 | 70602 | 61.3 | 183358 | 50.6 | 38770 | 44.7 | 292730 | 51.9 |
Unmarried | 41533 | 36.9 | 181847 | 48.0 | 45759 | 46.9 | 269139 | 45.7 | 34136 | 29.6 | 132962 | 36.7 | 29793 | 34.4 | 196891 | 34.9 |
Divorced | 7061 | 6.3 | 33014 | 8.7 | 13212 | 13.5 | 53287 | 9.0 | 10105 | 8.8 | 44430 | 12.3 | 17441 | 20.1 | 71976 | 12.8 |
Widowed | 136 | 0.1 | 469 | 0.1 | 151 | 0.2 | 756 | 0.1 | 386 | 0.3 | 1559 | 0.4 | 662 | 0.8 | 2607 | 0.5 |
Educational level | ||||||||||||||||
Compulsory | 8394 | 7.5 | 54648 | 14.4 | 19468 | 20.0 | 82510 | 14.0 | 6049 | 5.2 | 37809 | 10.4 | 17694 | 20.4 | 61552 | 10.9 |
Secondary school | 39897 | 35.5 | 180299 | 47.5 | 40517 | 41.5 | 260713 | 44.2 | 33467 | 29.0 | 143769 | 39.7 | 31130 | 35.9 | 208366 | 36.9 |
College/university | 62051 | 55.1 | 134442 | 35.5 | 29285 | 30.0 | 225778 | 38.3 | 73656 | 63.9 | 170864 | 47.2 | 29893 | 34.5 | 274413 | 48.6 |
Unknown | 2192 | 1.9 | 9797 | 2.6 | 8257 | 8.5 | 20246 | 3.4 | 2057 | 1.8 | 9867 | 2.7 | 7949 | 9.2 | 19873 | 3.5 |
Immigrant status | ||||||||||||||||
Born in Sweden | 104242 | 92.6 | 339553 | 89.5 | 61464 | 63.0 | 505259 | 85.7 | 105466 | 91.5 | 319750 | 88.3 | 53592 | 61.8 | 478808 | 84.9 |
Immigrant | 8292 | 7.4 | 39633 | 10.5 | 36063 | 37.0 | 83988 | 14.3 | 9763 | 8.5 | 42559 | 11.7 | 33074 | 38.2 | 85396 | 15.1 |
Region of residence | ||||||||||||||||
Big cities | 48741 | 43.3 | 146786 | 38.7 | 48424 | 49.7 | 243951 | 41.4 | 50633 | 43.9 | 142216 | 39.3 | 42565 | 49.1 | 235414 | 41.7 |
Southern Sweden | 40680 | 36.1 | 147382 | 38.9 | 33552 | 34.4 | 221614 | 37.6 | 41250 | 35.8 | 139840 | 38.6 | 30237 | 34.9 | 211327 | 37.5 |
Northern Sweden | 23097 | 20.5 | 84954 | 22.4 | 15492 | 15.9 | 123543 | 21.0 | 23329 | 20.2 | 80192 | 22.1 | 13826 | 16.0 | 117347 | 20.8 |
Unknown | 16 | 0.0 | 64 | 0.0 | 59 | 0.1 | 139 | 0.0 | 17 | 0.0 | 61 | 0.0 | 38 | 0.0 | 116 | 0.0 |
Hospital diagnosis of hypertension | ||||||||||||||||
Non | 109884 | 97.6 | 367738 | 97.0 | 94228 | 96.6 | 571850 | 97.0 | 113096 | 98.1 | 354113 | 97.7 | 84102 | 97.0 | 551311 | 97.7 |
Yes | 2650 | 2.4 | 11448 | 3.0 | 3299 | 3.4 | 17397 | 3.0 | 2133 | 1.9 | 8196 | 2.3 | 2564 | 3.0 | 12893 | 2.3 |
Hospital diagnosis of diabetes | ||||||||||||||||
Non | 110777 | 98.4 | 371233 | 97.9 | 94540 | 96.9 | 576550 | 97.8 | 114002 | 98.9 | 356965 | 98.5 | 84650 | 97.7 | 555617 | 98.5 |
Yes | 1757 | 1.6 | 7953 | 2.1 | 2987 | 3.1 | 12697 | 2.2 | 1227 | 1.1 | 5344 | 1.5 | 2016 | 2.3 | 8587 | 1.5 |
Hospital diagnosis of atrial fibrillation | ||||||||||||||||
Non | 111589 | 99.2 | 375892 | 99.1 | 96756 | 99.2 | 584237 | 99.1 | 114970 | 99.8 | 361367 | 99.7 | 86378 | 99.7 | 562715 | 99.7 |
Yes | 945 | 0.8 | 3294 | 0.9 | 771 | 0.8 | 5010 | 0.9 | 259 | 0.2 | 942 | 0.3 | 288 | 0.3 | 1489 | 0.3 |
Hospital diagnosis of heart failure | ||||||||||||||||
Non | 112295 | 99.8 | 377928 | 99.7 | 97031 | 99.5 | 587254 | 99.7 | 115092 | 99.9 | 361784 | 99.9 | 86432 | 99.7 | 563308 | 99.8 |
Yes | 239 | 0.2 | 1258 | 0.3 | 496 | 0.5 | 1993 | 0.3 | 137 | 0.1 | 525 | 0.1 | 234 | 0.3 | 896 | 0.2 |
All | 112534 | 100.0 | 379186 | 100.0 | 97527 | 100.0 | 589247 | 100.0 | 115229 | 100.0 | 362309 | 100.0 | 86666 | 100.0 | 564204 | 100.0 |
There were a total of 1777 strokes among men and 1374 strokes among women during follow-up, Supplementary Table 1.
The cumulative rates of stroke (per 1000 individuals) are presented in Table 2. Within each of the categories of marital status (except for a widowed category), education level, immigrant status, region of residence, and hospitalization for hypertension cumulative rates of stroke were higher in men and women living in low-SES neighbourhoods compared to those living in middle- and high-SES neighbourhoods. Cumulative stroke rates were also higher in men and women with a registered diagnosis of hypertension, and women with a registered diagnosis of diabetes and atrial fibrillation who lived in low-SES neighbourhoods. However, cumulative stroke rates among men hospitalized for diabetes and atrial fibrillation who lived in middle-SES neighbourhoods were higher than the rates of men from low- and high-SES neighbourhoods.
Table 2.
Men |
Women |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High | Middle | Low | All | High | Middle | Low | All | |
Year at entry* | ||||||||
1998-2000 | 4.05 | 5.08 | 6.27 | 5.10 | 2.93 | 3.71 | 5.01 | 3.77 |
2001-2003 | 3.27 | 3.89 | 4.33 | 3.85 | 2.22 | 2.63 | 4.54 | 2.86 |
2004-2006 | 2.01 | 2.68 | 3.36 | 2.66 | 1.76 | 2.34 | 3.20 | 2.35 |
2007-2010 | 1.25 | 1.66 | 2.05 | 1.64 | 1.21 | 1.55 | 1.82 | 1.52 |
Marital status | ||||||||
Married | 2.19 | 2.49 | 3.38 | 2.55 | 1.76 | 2.10 | 2.94 | 2.13 |
Unmarried | 2.87 | 3.26 | 3.69 | 3.27 | 1.73 | 2.55 | 3.59 | 2.56 |
Divorced | 1.42 | 4.24 | 5.15 | 4.09 | 3.17 | 2.90 | 4.30 | 3.28 |
Widowed | 0.00 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 5.18 | 3.85 | 3.02 | 3.84 |
Educational level | ||||||||
Compulsory | 4.17 | 4.41 | 5.29 | 4.59 | 3.80 | 4.07 | 4.46 | 4.16 |
Secondary school | 2.28 | 3.21 | 4.15 | 3.21 | 2.45 | 2.82 | 4.59 | 3.02 |
College/university | 2.24 | 2.24 | 2.60 | 2.29 | 1.51 | 1.67 | 2.07 | 1.67 |
Unknown | 1.82 | 2.04 | 2.42 | 2.17 | 0.49 | 1.52 | 1.76 | 1.51 |
Immigrant status | ||||||||
Born in Sweden | 2.35 | 3.04 | 3.92 | 3.00 | 1.94 | 2.45 | 3.92 | 2.50 |
Born outside | 2.89 | 2.78 | 3.49 | 3.10 | 1.23 | 1.79 | 2.66 | 2.06 |
Region of residence | ||||||||
Big cities | 2.54 | 3.02 | 4.09 | 3.14 | 1.70 | 2.51 | 3.15 | 2.45 |
Southern Sweden | 1.92 | 2.74 | 3.16 | 2.65 | 1.82 | 2.22 | 3.77 | 2.37 |
Northern Sweden | 2.90 | 3.46 | 4.07 | 3.43 | 2.40 | 2.38 | 3.62 | 2.53 |
Unknown | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
Hospital diagnosis of hypertension | ||||||||
Non | 1.75 | 2.14 | 2.54 | 2.13 | 1.59 | 1.84 | 2.45 | 1.88 |
Yes | 29.06 | 30.84 | 38.80 | 32.07 | 17.35 | 25.26 | 35.88 | 26.06 |
Hospital diagnosis of diabetes | ||||||||
Non | 2.23 | 2.65 | 3.33 | 2.68 | 1.81 | 2.14 | 2.97 | 2.20 |
Yes | 12.52 | 19.62 | 17.41 | 18.11 | 8.96 | 17.59 | 23.31 | 17.70 |
Hospital diagnosis of atrial fibrillation | ||||||||
Non | 2.33 | 2.87 | 3.66 | 2.90 | 1.86 | 2.31 | 3.30 | 2.37 |
Yes | 9.52 | 18.82 | 16.86 | 16.77 | 11.58 | 27.60 | 45.14 | 28.21 |
Hospital diagnosis of heart failure | ||||||||
Non | 2.30 | 2.90 | 3.58 | 2.90 | 1.86 | 2.32 | 3.32 | 2.38 |
Yes | 46.03 | 35.77 | 40.32 | 38.13 | 21.90 | 36.19 | 47.01 | 36.83 |
All | 2.39 | 3.01 | 3.76 | 3.02 | 1.88 | 2.37 | 3.44 | 2.44 |
The relationship between neighbourhood SES and stroke is presented in Table 3. There was significantly higher risks of stroke in neighbourhoods with low SES and lower risks of stroke in neighbourhoods with high SES when using neighbourhoods with middle SES as referents in all primary analyses models tested.
Table 3.
Group | Individuals at risk | First events | Incidence rate per 10000 person-years |
Model A |
Model B |
Model C |
Model D |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N | IR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||||
High | 227763 | 486 | 3.91 | 3.56 | 4.25 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 1.01 |
Middle | 741495 | 2000 | 4.99 | 4.77 | 5.21 | ref. | ref. | ref. | ref. | ||||||||
Low | 184193 | 665 | 6.46 | 5.96 | 6.95 | 1.25 | 1.14 | 1.37 | 1.19 | 1.08 | 1.30 | 1.16 | 1.06 | 1.27 | 1.12 | 1.02 | 1.23 |
HR: Hazard ratios; CI: Confidence interval. There was no significant interaction with sex, p=0.303.
Model A: adjusted for gender; Model B: adjusted for gender, marital status, educational level, immigrant status, and region of residence. Model C: adjusted for factors in Model B and neighbourhood goods and services (fast food restaurants, bars/pubs, physical activity facilities and health care resources). Model D: adjusted for factors in Model C and hospital diagnoses for hypertension, heart failure, and diabetes prior to the age of 40.
The associations were attenuated in the secondary analysis (adjusted for hospital diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and heart failure prior to the age of 40), however, the higher risk in low SES neighbourhoods remained significant.
There was no significant interaction with sex, p=0.303.
The relationship between neighbourhood SES and stroke is presented in men and women separately in Table 4. In a crude model, compared to individuals living in middle-SES neighbourhoods, risk of stroke was lower among men and women living in high-SES neighbourhoods and higher among those living in low-SES neighbourhoods. After adjustment for potential confounders, the difference in risk of stroke between women remained significant, but was attenuated among men from low- and middle-SES neighbourhoods and was no longer significant. Similarly, no significant difference in risk of stroke was observed between women living in high-and middle-SES neighbourhoods after adjustment for potential confounders. However, the difference in risk of stroke between men from high- and middle-SES remained significant after the adjustment for socio-demographic variables and neighbourhood goods and services, but was no longer significant after the additional adjustment for hospital diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and heart failure prior to the age of 40. In addition, the higher risk of stroke among women living in low-SES neighbourhoods compared to women living in middle-SES neighbourhoods was attenuated after the adjustment for confounders but remained significant throughout all models.
Table 4.
Group | Individuals at risk | First events | Incidence rate per 10000 person-years |
Model A |
Model B |
Model C |
Model D |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N | IR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||||
Men | |||||||||||||||||
High | 112534 | 269 | 4.38 | 3.86 | 4.91 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.76 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 1.05 |
Middle | 379186 | 1141 | 5.60 | 5.27 | 5.92 | ref. | ref. | ref. | ref. | ||||||||
Low | 97527 | 367 | 6.78 | 6.08 | 7.47 | 1.17 | 1.03 | 1.31 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 1.24 | 1.05 | 0.93 | 1.20 | 1.05 | 0.92 | 1.19 |
Women | |||||||||||||||||
High | 115229 | 217 | 3.44 | 2.99 | 3.90 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 1.01 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 1.01 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 1.05 |
Middle | 362309 | 859 | 4.37 | 4.07 | 4.66 | ref. | ref. | ref. | ref. | ||||||||
Low | 86666 | 298 | 6.10 | 5.41 | 6.79 | 1.37 | 1.20 | 1.56 | 1.31 | 1.14 | 1.51 | 1.30 | 1.13 | 1.49 | 1.22 | 1.06 | 1.40 |
HR: Hazard ratios; CI: Confidence interval.
Model A: adjusted for gender; Model B: adjusted for gender, marital status, educational level, immigrant status, and region of residence. Model C: adjusted for factors in Model B and neighbourhood goods and services (fast food restaurants, bars/pubs, physical activity facilities and health care resources). Model D: adjusted for factors in Model C and hospital diagnoses for hypertension, heart failure, and diabetes prior to the age of 40.
Discussion
There was in accord with our hypothesis a lower risk of stroke among individuals below the age of 50 years in neighbourhoods with high socio-economic status; and a higher risk of stroke in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status with no sign of a sex-interaction. We confirmed a lower risk among men in neighbourhoods with high socio-economic status as well as the increased risk among women in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status after adjustments for marital status, education level, immigrant status, and region of residence in Sweden and local goods and services in the neighbourhoods. The higher risk among women in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status was attenuated but remained significant after further adjustments, diabetes and atrial fibrillation prior to the age of 40.
Comparisons with other studies
We have recently shown that living in middle neighbourhood SES at the age of 40 was significantly associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary heart disease (CHD) before the age of 50 years, and that lower risks of both MI and CHD were seen in individuals living in high SES neighbourhoods [11]. The present study expands the role of neighbourhood socio-economic status in individuals below 50 years from coronary heart disease outcomes to ischemic strokes. Others have shown that neighbourhood low socio-economic status is a risk factor for stroke among whites but not among blacks in Texas, USA [3], that personal income explain the stroke risk associated with neighbourhood socio-economic status in New Zealand [4], that the differences in the stroke rates in different Swedish neighbourhoods in addition to socio-economic status can be explained by higher rates of established cardiovascular risk factors in these neighbourhoods [5], different stroke rates in different postal code areas in Australia [7], and that age and gender interactions in the risk of stroke in neighbourhoods with different levels of socio-economic status exist [6]. We did not, however, find any significant interaction with sex in the present study. In contrast to theses previous studies and to our study, that were all conducted in western countries, a recent study from China found that stroke is more common in wealthier villages [15], where a more “western lifestyle” is common. However, as far as we know there are no previous studies on the risk of stroke in individuals residing in neighbourhoods with different socio-economic status that has been conducted solely in individuals below 50 years.
Possible explanation to our findings
The results of the present observational study cannot be regarded as causal, but there are several potential mechanisms that may explain our findings. Stroke preventive anticoagulant pharmacotherapy for high risk individuals, i.e. patients with atrial fibrillation, have been shown to be less optimal in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status [16], and could explain some of our findings; as all our findings were attenuated when adjusted for registered diagnoses prior to the age of 40. However, when it comes to risk stratification for anticoagulant treatment among individuals with atrial fibrillation, the guidelines used during the follow-up (CHADS2) do not support anticoagulant treatment in those below 75 years of age without comorbidities [17]. The current guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation do not support anticoagulant treatment in men below 65 years of age without comorbidities (CHA2DS2-VASc) [18, 19], as they are considered to have a low risk. Thus, younger individuals with atrial fibrillation are seldom prescribed anticoagulant treatment. The number of fast food restaurants has been shown to have an effect on incident strokes [20], and could potentially explain our findings, yet, the lower risk among men in neighbourhoods with high socio-economic status as well as the increased risk among women in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status remained significant after adjustments for fast food restaurants, bars/pubs, physical activity facilities and health care resources in the neighbourhoods. Furthermore, mental ill-health is increasing among teenagers in Sweden, especially among individuals with low-educated parents, and the mental ill-health has also been linked to a higher incidence of early stroke [9]. Another factor of possible interest is congenital heart defects, exerting a 10-fold risk of stroke [21]. Congenital heart defects are shown to be modestly associated to maternal low socio-economic status [22], and maternal smoking [23], factors that are likely to be more common in neighbourhoods with low socio-economic status.
The most important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases are also somewhat different in different age-groups, but whether the neighbourhood SES increase these differences remains to be studied.
Clinical implications
Even in a county with a healthcare system approaching socialized medicine, Sweden, psychosocial factors have repeatedly been shown to have an effect on the cardiovascular health [24]. In fact we have previously shown that pharmacotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation [16], mortality in atrial fibrillation [25], and that coronary heart disease in individuals below the age of 50 is determined to some extent of the neighbourhood socio-economic status [11]. Thus, to claim that equal opportunities for long-term health exists; directed screenings and interventions are warranted for identified vulnerable groups. One such group is those living in low SES neighborhoods. To reduce the risk, established cardiovascular risk factors should be closely monitored [26, 27]. In fact, risk prediction models for coronary heart disease such as QRISK2 that included residing in neighborhoods with different SES scores have been developed [28, 29]. The performance of the QRISK score has in fact been shown to be better than the Framingham model in identifying high risk for cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, we think that both neighborhood and individual level SES should be given more attention in the clinical setting, when physicians and other health care workers estimate the risk of serious cardiovascular events such as stroke in their patients. Neighbourhood SES may also be used in risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation when clincians are in doubt of initiating treatment with anticoagulants or not [16].
Limitations and strengths
Because of the design of the neighbourhood SES variable, we decided to use middle SES neighbourhood as referents as they were within one standard deviation of the mean neighbourhood SES. Using one of the extremes would have yielded more dramatic but less robust risk estimates in the tables.
One of the limitations of this study was lack of data on established cardiovascular risk factors, as these were not available in the nationwide registers of the entire Swedish population. Yet, we did have access to registered hospital diagnoses and adjusted for diabetes, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, the results of this study may not be generalizable to other age-groups. However, we believe it is important to study risk of events in younger middle-aged adults separately, as these often leave debilitating consequences to the individuals themselves with profound impact on their family members; and long treatment and rehabilitation related to this chronic disease result in high health care costs. Despite the limitations, one of the major strengths of the present study was that we were able to include all individuals residing in Sweden at their 40th birthday with data on their neighborhood SES as well as data on individual level SES, and follow them for cardiovascular events until the age of 50. We believe that the internal validity is higher with this methodology, than if all individuals below 50 would have been included, since many people live on different locations in their early years of adulthood. The use of the total population may be of particular importance, since individuals in low resource settings have lower participation rates in surveys. Another strength is the Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register in Sweden, which are nearly complete (99.8%) [30], and thus enable long-term evaluation without any significant loss to follow-up.
Given the high internal validity of the study, we believe that the study also has external validity and that the results may be generalizable for estimating the risks in high and low SES neighbourhoods in other western countries.
Conclusions
The results of the present study suggest that
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants to Kristina Sundquist and Jan Sundquist from the Swedish Research Council as well as ALF funding to Jan Sundquist and Kristina Sundquist from Region Skåne.
Research reported in this publication was also supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HL116381 to Kristina Sundquist. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Diez Roux AV, Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health, 2001. 91(11): p. 1783–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Diez Roux AV, et al. , Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med, 2001. 345(2): p. 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brown AF, et al. , Neighborhood disadvantage and ischemic stroke: the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). Stroke, 2011. 42(12): p. 3363–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown P, Guy M, and Broad J, Individual socio-economic status, community socio-economic status and stroke in New Zealand: a case control study. Soc Sci Med, 2005. 61(6): p. 1174–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Engstrom G, et al. , Geographic distribution of stroke incidence within an urban population: relations to socioeconomic circumstances and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Stroke, 2001. 32(5): p. 1098–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lisabeth LD, et al. , Neighborhood environment and risk of ischemic stroke: the brain attack surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project. Am J Epidemiol, 2007. 165(3): p. 279–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thrift AG, et al. , Greater incidence of both fatal and nonfatal strokes in disadvantaged areas: the Northeast Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study. Stroke, 2006. 37(3): p. 877–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rosengren A, et al. , Twenty-four-year trends in the incidence of ischemic stroke in Sweden from 1987 to 2010. Stroke, 2013. 44(9): p. 2388–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aberg MA, et al. , Nonpsychotic Mental Disorders in Teenage Males and Risk of Early Stroke: A Population-Based Study. Stroke, 2016. 47(3): p. 814–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yan T, et al. , Exploring psychosocial pathways between neighbourhood characteristics and stroke in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Age Ageing, 2013. 42(3): p. 391–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carlsson AC, et al. , Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and coronary heart disease in individuals between 40 and 50 years. Heart, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cubbin C, et al. , Neighborhood deprivation and cardiovascular disease risk factors: protective and harmful effects. Scandinavian journal of public health, 2006. 34(3): p. 228–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sundquist J, et al. , Low linking social capital as a predictor of coronary heart disease in Sweden: a cohort study of 2.8 million people. Soc Sci Med, 2006. 62(4): p. 954–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Winkleby M, Sundquist K, and Cubbin C, Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation. Am J Prev Med, 2007. 32(2): p. 97–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tang X, et al. , Neighborhood socioeconomic status and the prevalence of stroke and coronary heart disease in rural China: a population-based study. Int J Stroke, 2015. 10(3): p. 388–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carlsson AC, et al. , Neighborhood deprivation and warfarin, aspirin and statin prescription - A cohort study of men and women treated for atrial fibrillation in Swedish primary care. Int J Cardiol, 2015. 187: p. 547–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gage BF, et al. , Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA, 2001. 285(22): p. 2864–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lip GY, et al. , Identifying patients at high risk for stroke despite anticoagulation: a comparison of contemporary stroke risk stratification schemes in an anticoagulated atrial fibrillation cohort. Stroke, 2010. 41(12): p. 2731–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lip GY, et al. , Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest, 2010. 137(2): p. 263–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Morgenstern LB, et al. , Fast food and neighborhood stroke risk. Ann Neurol, 2009. 66(2): p. 165–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mandalenakis Z, et al. , Ischemic Stroke in Children and Young Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc, 2016. 5(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yu D, et al. , Maternal socioeconomic status and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a meta-analysis of 33 studies. PLoS One, 2014. 9(10): p. e111056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee LJ and Lupo PJ, Maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Pediatr Cardiol, 2013. 34(2): p. 398–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rosengren A, et al. , Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet, 2004. 364(9438): p. 953–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wandell P, et al. , Neighbourhood socio-economic status and all-cause mortality in adults with atrial fibrillation: A cohort study of patients treated in primary care in Sweden. Int J Cardiol, 2016. 202: p. 776–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Greenland P, et al. , Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease events. Jama, 2003. 290(7): p. 891–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khot UN, et al. , Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. Jama, 2003. 290(7): p. 898–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hippisley-Cox J, et al. , Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent UK sample of patients from general practice: a validation study. Heart, 2008. 94(1): p. 34–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Collins GS and Altman DG, An independent and external validation of QRISK2 cardiovascular disease risk score: a prospective open cohort study. BMJ, 2010. 340: p. c2442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Almgren T, et al. , Diabetes in treated hypertension is common and carries a high cardiovascular risk: results from a 28-year follow-up. J Hypertens, 2007. 25(6): p. 1311–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]