Skip to main content
Parasites & Vectors logoLink to Parasites & Vectors
. 2019 Aug 23;12:414. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3672-8

Differential gene expression, including Sjfs800, in Schistosoma japonicum females at pre-pairing, initial pairing and oviposition

Fengchun Liu 1,2,#, Han Ding 1,2,#, Jiaming Tian 1,2, Congyu Zhou 1,2, Fei Yang 1,2, Wei Shao 1,2, Yinan Du 1,2, Xin Hou 1,2, Cuiping Ren 1,2, Jijia Shen 1,2, Miao Liu 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6708146  PMID: 31443730

Abstract

Background

Schistosomiasis is a prevalent but neglected tropical disease caused by parasitic trematodes of the genus Schistosoma, with the primary disease-causing species being S. haematobium, S. mansoni and S. japonicum. Male–female pairing of schistosomes is necessary for sexual maturity and the production of a large number of eggs, which are primarily responsible for schistosomiasis dissemination and pathology.

Methods

Here, we used microarray hybridization, bioinformatics, quantitative PCR, in situ hybridization and gene silencing assays to identify genes that play critical roles in S. japonicum reproduction biology, particularly in vitellarium development, a process that affects male–female pairing, sexual maturation and subsequent egg production.

Results

Microarray hybridization analyses generated a comprehensive set of genes differentially transcribed before and after male–female pairing. Although the transcript profiles of females were similar 16 and 18 days after host infection, marked gene expression changes were observed at 24 days. The 30 most abundantly transcribed genes on day 24 included those associated with vitellarium development. Among these, the gene for female-specific 800 (fs800) was substantially upregulated. Our in situ hybridization results in female S. japonicum indicated that Sjfs800 mRNA was observed only in the vitellarium, localized in mature vitelline cells. Knocking down the Sjfs800 gene in female S. japonicum by approximately 60% reduced the number of mature vitelline cells, decreased rates of pairing and oviposition, and decreased the number of eggs produced in each male–female pairing by about 50%.

Conclusions

These results indicate that Sjfs800 may play a role in vitellarium development and egg production in S. japonicum and suggest that Sjfs800 regulation may provide a novel approach for the prevention or treatment of schistosomiasis.

Keywords: Schistosoma japonicum, Sjfs800, Vitellarium development, Egg production

Background

Schistosomiasis is a tropical disease caused by parasitic trematodes of the genus Schistosoma. Although it is one of the most prevalent tropical infectious diseases, with more than 240 million people in 78 countries infected and approximately 800 million people at risk, schistosomiasis has been drastically understudied [13]. The primary disease-causing species of Schistosoma are S. haematobium, S. mansoni and S. japonicum, the latter of which is distributed in China, Indonesia and the Philippines [13]. Disease burden assessments for schistosomiasis, based on the extent of end-organ damage and the associated morbidities related to malnutrition and chronic inflammation, indicate that the annual number of disability-adjusted life years lost is approximately 70 million [4]. Current control of schistosomiasis depends largely on a single drug, praziquantel; however, reliance on a single drug produces a precarious situation. Indeed, some studies have shown that isolates of schistosomes have reduced susceptibility to praziquantel [57]. Thus, additional novel strategies are urgently needed to prevent and control schistosomiasis.

Schistosoma japonicum has a complex developmental cycle that involves an aquatic snail as an intermediate host and a mammalian definitive host. In contrast to other trematode species, these parasites are unique in that males and females need to pair to continue development. Pairing of schistosome females and males promotes female reproductive system maturation and the production of eggs, which are a primary means of schistosomiasis transmission and immunopathological lesions [810]. Maturation and maintenance of normal reproductive function in female schistosome require permanent pairing with the male. During pairing, germ cells in the reproductive organ differentiate into oocytes or vitellocytes, and some chemical or tactile stimulus exchange occurs between the male and female, leading to a cascade of changes during the pairing process [1116]. However, the effects on female reproductive system development and the molecular mechanisms underpinning male–female pairing have not been completely determined, leaving myriad questions that require further study.

Ongoing work in our laboratory has indicated that during the development of S. japonicum, no male–female pairing occurs up to 16 days after the host is infected. Some pairing occurs 17 days post-infection (dpi), and pairing is common 18 dpi. Paired females begin laying eggs approximately 24 dpi [17, 18]. Therefore, in the present study, to identify genes that likely contribute to pairing and reproduction, we used microarray technology to determine differential gene expression in females 16, 18 and 24 dpi. We identified genes that play critical roles in the development of the vitellarium and in the production of eggs, providing a clearer understanding of gene regulation before and after male–female pairing in the S. japonicum female and insights on schistosome reproduction biology.

Methods

Animals and parasites

Freshly shed wild-type cercariae of S. japonicum were harvested from infected Oncomelania hupensis that were purchased from the Hunan Institute of Parasitic Diseases in Yueyang, China. Female Kunming mice (6–8 weeks-old) and New Zealand rabbits (4 months-old) were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of Anhui Medical University. New Zealand rabbits and female Kunming mice were infected with 1000 or 50 cercariae, respectively, via the skin of the abdomen. After 16, 18, 24, 28 or 42 dpi the worms were perfused from the hepatic portal vein using perfusion techniques. Male and female worms were manually separated. In order to collect S. japonicum eggs, liver tissues from rabbits 6 weeks post-infection were homogenized and then subjected to consecutive fractional filtration. The filtrate was centrifuged. The supernatant and the tissue-containing layers were removed, leaving the egg-containing layer, which was diluted in 1.2% saline and passed through a nylon net (300 mesh, i.e., 300 holes per inch). All parasite samples were soaked in RNAlater (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and stored at − 80 °C until they were used for total RNA extraction.

RNA extraction, amplification and labeling

Total RNA was extracted and purified using RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and the overall RNA quality was assessed using denaturing gel electrophoresis (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Total RNA was amplified and labeled using a Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit, one-color (Agilent Technologies), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Labeled cRNA was purified using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen).

Microarray construction and hybridization and subsequent data analysis

A schistosome genome-wide microarray was used for profiling gene expression in S. japonicum females 16, 18 and 24 dpi. Microarrays were printed on the Agilent custom Schistosoma 4 × 44K chip (design ID: 048766). The chip sequence is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. There was a total of eight specimens. There were three specimens of 16 dpi female worms, three specimens of 18 dpi female worms and two specimens of 24 dpi female worms. Thus, two chips in total were needed. Each slide was hybridized with 1.65 μg of Cy3-labeled cRNA using a Gene Expression Hybridization Kit (Agilent Technologies) with a Hybridization Oven (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 17 h of hybridization had elapsed, the slides were washed in staining dishes (Thermo Shandon, Waltham, MA, USA) with a Gene Expression Wash Buffer Kit (Agilent Technologies), following the manufacturers’ instructions. All of these aforementioned procedures were performed by SHBIO Biotechnology Corporation (Shanghai, China). The slides were scanned with an Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies) using the following default settings: dye channel, green; scan resolution, 5 μm; photomultiplier tube, 100% and 10%, 16 bit. Data were extracted with Feature Extraction software v. 10.7 (Agilent Technologies). Raw data were normalized using the Quantile algorithm, GeneSpring software v.11.0 (Agilent Technologies). Outlier probes were identified, and their contribution was reduced at the reported gene expression level. The expression value of a gene was a weighted average of all forward or reverse probe sets when both background correction and quantile normalization were performed.

Bioinformatics analysis

The mRNA and expressed sequence tag transcripts highly enriched in S. japonicum 16, 18, and 24 dpi were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Entrez Gene database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) based on fold change (FC = signal A/signal B) values (FC ≥ 2, three biological replicates; FC ≥ 3, two biological replicates). Student’s t-test was used to determine genes differentially expressed between one stage and the other. To determine the potential function of these upregulated genes, the Gene Ontology (GO) functional categories were assessed. All analyses were conducted using the online SBC Analysis System of SHBIO Biotechnology Corporation (http://sas.shbio.com). The raw data were normalized using the quantile algorithm from the limma package in R. Heatmaps representing differentially regulated genes were generated using Cluster v.3.0 and Tree View software. Two sets of samples were generated using DiffGenes differential expression analysis package in R. The first set of samples was in one column, and the second set of samples was in a second column. The P-value was set to the desired range of statistical significance, and the fold-change was set to the desired difference. The gene functions of those genes identified with the desired fold change and P-values were then determined and annotated.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Thirteen genes whose expression levels were increased and two genes whose expression levels were decreased in females’ initial pairing and oviposition (i.e. 18 and 24 dpi) relative to those levels pre-pairing (i.e. 16 dpi) were selected for validation using qPCR. Total RNA (500 ng) from the females was reverse transcribed into first-strand cDNA using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each 20 μl of PCR reaction contained 10 μl of 2× SYBR Premix Ex qTaq II, 1 μl of cDNA, 1.6 μl of the forward and reverse primer pair, 0.4 μl of 50× ROX Reference Dye and 7 μl of sterile water. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 95 °C and 1 min annealing and extension at 60 °C. A dissociation step (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min and 95 °C for 15 s) was performed to confirm the amplification specificity for each gene. A reliable reference gene for transcriptomic analysis of S. japonicum, proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 4 (PSMD4), was used as a control gene in the assays [19]. The PCR primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 software (Table 1). PCR reactions were performed in technical triplicates using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The relative expression level of each gene was analyzed using SDS v.1.4 software (Applied Biosystems).

Table 1.

Quantitative PCR primers (5’ to 3’)

Gene name Gene ID Sense primer Anti-sense primer
Unknown 226471383 ATTCACCACAACCCACT TATTGCCACCTCCACTT
Trematode eggshell synthesis 226473101 ATCCACGTCTTACCAGA AGCAGCGATACTACCTT
Superoxide dismutase 226474963 CCATTCAACATGCGTCC CTGCCTTCATCTGGATTTCT
Keratin 9 226477615 ACAGCTACGGAAATGC CAATAATAGGAGGGTGC
Prostatic spermine-binding protein 226477985 GATTATGCTGATGTGAG CGTTTGATTCGTGTCTA
Myoglobin 1 226487201 TCAGGGACTTGATGCTA CAACTGGTCGAGTTCTAT
Annexin 226469397 TCCATTCGGTTTACTCT TTCAGCAATGTCCCTAG
Cytochrome b 56046805 AAGAAGTTGGTGGTGG GTGCCTTTGAGGTTGTCC
Female-specific protein 800 60600619 TGGAAACGAAAGTGAG CTGGAATTGAAAGGACC
Tetraspanin-1 56757404 AAGGTAAAGGTGGTAGC CAATGAATGCCGATAAG
Tyrosinase precursor 56757710 TGGTGTTTGTTTCCCTA CTCTATTACCACCTCTTTGA
Putative transmembrane protein 56757833 TAGTTGGGAGACTTTGC TACATTTCGGATTGCTG
Multivesicular body protein 5 226467851 TTGCTTCAAGGCGGCT CCGTGTTGTTTATTGGGAC
Unknown gene 226477693 TGGTGGTCCAGATTGTT CATAGTAGTCATTTCCGTAG
Egghell precursor protein 226478597 ATGACTACAACTCCGACTAC CTCTGACATCTAAACGACCA

Total RNAs from eggs, cercariae, schistosomula and females at 24 and 42 dpi were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative PCR was performed as described above using primer (Table 1) combinations to amplify gene transcripts of S. japonicum female-specific 800 (fs800).

In situ hybridization

Riboprobes were synthesized according to previously published methods [20]. Briefly, Transcripts were amplified from mixed adult male and female cDNA using the following primers: sense primer (5′-GAA TTC TGC CCA TAG GAA TGG TAG AAT-3′); anti-sense primer (5′-AAG CTT CCT CAC TGT TGT TAG GCG AA-3′). PCR products were cloned into the pSPT-18/19 T vector. Probes were synthesized from restriction enzyme-digested DNA according to the orientation of the insert in Pspt-18/19 using a DIG RNA Labeling Kit (SP6/T7) (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) labeled with digoxigenin. For whole-mount in situ hybridization, trematodes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min and dehydrated in methanol. Following bleaching in 6% hydrogen peroxide in methanol to prevent tanning of the vitellaria, trematodes were permeabilized using proteinase k (TaKaRa), incubated with prehybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 5× saline sodium citrate, 1 mg/ml yeast RNA, 1% Tween 20) for 2 h and then hybridized (pre-hybridization buffer with 10% dextran sulfate) with a riboprobe at 56 °C for 20 h. Excess riboprobe was removed by washing in 2× and 0.2× saline sodium citrate, followed by blocking in blocking reagent (Roche). The bound riboprobe was detected after incubation of trematodes in anti-digoxigenin alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (Roche) diluted 1:5000 in blocking reagent overnight at 4 °C. The unbound antibody was removed by washing in maleic acid buffer (100 mM maleic acid, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20 at pH 7.5) for 4 h in 12 changes of buffer. After washing, specimens were incubated in detection buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl and 0.1 M NaCl at pH 9.5). Hybridization signals were detected by adding 200 μl of NBT/BCIP in detection buffer. After development, trematodes were washed in PBS then de-stained with 100% ethanol. Trematodes were mounted in 80% glycerol, and then microscopy and digital image capture were performed using an Olympus DP73 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). All images were obtained from at least three independent WISH experiments using at least 20 worms of each sex in each experiment.

RNA interference

The siRNAs (21 base pairs) were designed using the Sjfs800 mRNA sequence (GenBank accession no. FN313803.1) with the Thermo Fisher website software (https://rnaidesigner.thermofisher.com) and chemically synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Three siRNA sequences (siRNA1-3) that shared no homology with any other S. japonicum gene based on an online analysis with BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and the scrambled siRNA sequence are shown in Table 2. The results of RNAi were tested using qPCR as previously described [21]. Briefly, Kunming mice were challenged percutaneously with 60–70 cercariae and were humanely killed 28 dpi. The worms were obtained by portal perfusion using RPMI 1640 medium at 37 °C and were then incubated in 24-well plates (15 pairs/well) containing 1 ml of complete Basch medium, with half of the medium exchanged every day. The medium was supplemented with 10 KU/ml penicillin, 10 mg/ml streptomycin, 250 μg/ml amphotericin B (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen) was used to transfect worms with one of the three Sjfs800-specific siRNAs, at a final concentration of 100 nM, or RNAase-free water (mock, no siRNA). The gene-silencing effect of each siRNA was determined using qPCR at the end of a 72-h cultivation period. The worms were then transfected with either the siRNA that was found to be most efficient or with the scrambled siRNA (control). The transfected worms were cultivated for up to 10 days and transfected again with siRNA1 on the fourth and seventh days; half of the medium was exchanged every day. After 10 days, all the eggs in the medium were collected and counted using light microscopy. The eggs in female uterus per couple were also counted using light microscopy. Adult male–female pairings were also observed and counted. The siRNA silencing effects and morphological changes were measured using qPCR and confocal laser scanning microscopy (TCS SP5; Leica, Mannheim, Germany), respectively.

Table 2.

The sequences of siRNA (5′–3′)

Sense Anti-sense
Sjfs800SiRNA1 GCCCAUAGGAAMGGUAGAATT UUCUACCAUUCCUAMGGGCTT
Sjfs800SiRNA2 GCCUCAUCUAUAUMGUCUATT UAGACAAUAUAGAMGAGGCTT
Sjfs800SiRNA3 CCAAAGGUUAUCGMGGAAATT UUUCCACGAUAACCUUMGGTT
SiNCTRL UUCUCCGAACGMGUCACGUTT ACGMGACACGUUCGGAGAATT
SiCTRL ACAGUAGCAMGCAGCAGGTT CCΜGCMGGCUACMGUTT

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

The confocal laser scanning microscopy procedure has been described previously [22]. After 10 days of Sjfs800-specific siRNA1 treatment, the male–female paired couples were separated manually and fixed separately in a solution of 95% ethanol, 3% formaldehyde and 2% glacial acetic acid. The trematodes were then stained in 2.5% hydrochloric carmine (Ourchem, Shanghai, China) for 16 h at 37 °C and de-stained in 70% acidic ethanol. After dehydration in an ethanol series for 1 min in each concentration, parasites were cleared for 1 min each in 50% xylene diluted in ethanol and 100% xylene, and then whole-mounted with neutral balsam (Sinopharm Chemical, Shanghai, China) on glass slides. The reproductive organ morphology of the worms was examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy, with a 470-nm long pass filter and a 488-nm He/Ne laser under reflection mode. All images were obtained from at least three independent RNAi experiments using at least 7 female worms in each experiment.

Statistical analysis

Results were acquired from three biological replicates representing three independent experiments with identical conditions. One-way analysis of variance and independent-sample t-tests were used for data analysis with the SPSS v.17.0, statistics software package. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM, and P < 0.05 or P < 0.01 were deemed statistically significant.

Results

Number of paired and unpaired female worms on specific days after host infection

As well known, male–female pairing occurs up to 24 days after the host is infection. Before this, no male–female pairing occurring up to 16 days after the host is infected. Some pairing occurs 17 days post-infection (dpi), and pairing is common 18 dpi. The statistical methods and results are presented in Additional file 2: Figure S1 and Additional file 3: Table S2.

Microarray screening of differentially expressed genes in female S. japonicum at pre-pairing (16 dpi), initial pairing (18 dpi) and oviposition (24 dpi)

The results of microarray analyses are shown in Additional file 4: Table S3, Additional file 5: Table S4 and Additional file 6: Table S5. To our knowledge the most comprehensive and informative probe assay design to date, indicated that after removing the duplicates, signal intensities were upregulated (FC ≥ 2) for nearly 132 sequences in female worms at 18 dpi and for nearly 198 sequences in female worms at 24 dpi. Many mRNA transcripts were differentially expressed at pre-pairing (16 dpi), initial pairing (18 dpi) and oviposition (24 dpi), with most of these genes elevated in expression oviposition. The most highly increased gene products at oviposition were associated primarily with oxygen metabolism, the metabolic machinery of egg production, and vitellarium development. The 30 differentially expressed genes with highest expression levels after pairing are given in Table 3.

Table 3.

The top 30 differentially expressed genes in female S. japonicum in oviposition (24 dpi) relative to levels pre-pairing (16 dpi)

Probe name Gene ID Protein ID P-value Fold change Description
CUST_14058_PI428956223 226474963 FN316039.1 0.001295 574.7126437 Extracellular superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]
CUST_13165_PI428956223 226473101 FN315505.1 0.021586 462.9629297 Trematode eggshell synthesis
CUST_21221_PI428956223 257207815 FN327835.1 0.020981 393.7007874 Protein matches (BLink) hsp40 subfamily A members 124
CUST_15773_PI428956223 226477693 FN316810.1 0.017062 252.525522 Unknown
CUST_21010_PI428956223 257207472 FN327620.1 0.029122 157.9778831 1 atypical protein kinase C
CUST_25908_PI428956223 257215731 FN330801.1 0.026122 149.7000599 DNA damage-responsive protein 48
CUST_12207_PI428956223 226471111 FN314905.1 0.04503 145.7725948 Serine/threonine kinase-1
CUST_4027_PI428956223 60600619 AY810878.1 0.038204 85.68980291 Female-specific protein 800
CUST_7243_PI428956223 56756748 AY814814.1 0.03629 71.73601148 Similar to histidine kinase DhkM
CUST_21060_PI428956223 257207522 FN327670.1 0.013621 44.98353526 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein
CUST_991_PI428956223 226469397 FN314445.1 0.018024 39.06715587 ESG-1 protein precursor
CUST_384_PI428962778 7644645 AW736781. 0.037435 36.43282441 Hemoglobin subunit alpha-1/2
CUST_15482_PI428956223 226477985 FN316955.1 0.035783 35.52397869 Prostatic spermine-binding protein precursor
CUST_11368_PI428956223 226469397 FN314445.1 0.026528 30.82413089 Annexin
CUST_5987_PI428956223 56753799 AY813365.1 0.039938 27.21671965 Transmembrane 9 superfamily member
CUST_15466_PI428956223 226477953 FN316939.1 0.000743 23.10313701 Unknown
CUST_7706_PI428956223 56757833 AY815325.1 0.02429 22.54660519 Putative epiplakin 1
CUST_7411_PI428956223 56757114 AY814997.1 0.025618 22.38696546 Contains repetitive sequences
CUST_999_PI428962772 56046805 CV738262.1 0.048425 22.00714633 Cytochrome b
CUST_713_PI428956223 60601043 AY811090.1 0.019922 21.02855408 Venom allergen-like (VAL) 7 protein
CUST_3699_PI428956223 60599676 AY810494.1 0.002295 17.84851112 Similar to labial-like protein
CUST_17613_PI428956223 226482651 FN318196.1 0.040935 8.663126238 PRP4 pre-mRNA processing factor 4 homolog B
CUST_17613_PI428956223 2290411 U92488.1 0.037768 8.470548849 Cyclophilin A
CUST_1037_PI428956223 22164072 AF412216.1 0.04818 8.237366919 Vacuolar proton translocating ATPase 116 kDa subunit a isoform 1

Bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed genes

In the biological process GO category, the genes involved in metabolic and biosynthetic processes were more active in initial pairing females (18 dpi) than pre-pairing (16 dpi), indicating that nutritional acquisition is more crucial for 18 dpi than 16 dpi female worms, which is likely a reflection of the oviposition status. In the molecular function GO category, the genes involved in hydrolase activity were more active in 18 dpi females and 24 dpi than 16 dpi females. In the cellular component GO category, gene products localized to membrane-bound organelles were more enriched in 24 dpi females than 16 dpi or 18 dpi females.

Confirmation of differentially expressed genes by qPCR analysis

Fifteen differentially expressed genes were selected for confirmation using qPCR. The analysis for each gene was repeated three times and PSMD4 was used as the housekeeping gene. After normalization, the relative changes in gene expression were determined using the 2−ΔΔct method. The expression levels of two genes, annexin and tetraspanin-1, were not consistent between the qPCR and microarray analyses. The results for the remaining 13 gene expression levels were consistent across qPCR and microarray analyses (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Validation of the microarray analysis results by qPCR. Data are normalized to the internal housekeeping control PSMD4. Expression levels of 15 selected genes were determined using the comparative method (2−ΔΔct). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (three biological replicates). Asterisks show statistical differences (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) tested by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons (Tukey’s post-hoc test)

Expression of Sjfs800 in the eggs, cercariae and schistosomula at 16 dpi, worms at 24 and 42 dpi

The gene expression level for Sjfs800 was determined using qPCR of the eggs, cercariae, schistosomula and adult worms at 24 and 42 dpi. We found Sjfs800 that were highly expressed in females at 42 dpi. However, the expression levels of Sjfs800 were very low in the eggs, cercariae and schistosomula at 16 dpi, and the male worms at 24 and 42 dpi. It modestly increased in female worms at 24 dpi, with a further increase at 42 dpi (Fig. 2). These results may be presumed to suggest that Sjfs800 may be associated with sex maturation and oviposition of female worms.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Expression levels of female-specific protein 800 (fs800) at various developmental stages of S. japonicum as measured by qPCR. qPCR was used to analyze fs800 in life-cycle stages: eggs, cercariae, schistosomula (at 16 dpi) and adult worms at 24 and 42 dpi (F(4,10) = 173.5, DF = 4, P < 0.0001). Data represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (three biological replicates), compared to the egg group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA

Localization by in situ hybridization of Sjfs800 transcripts in S. japonicum

An in situ hybridization analysis showed the transcriptional activities Sjfs800 in S. japonicum at 24 dpi (Fig. 3). There were no positive signals in 24 dpi male worms. The expression of Sjfs800 mRNA was observed only in the vitellarium in female worms.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Localization of Sjfs800 transcripts in S. japonicum at 24 dpi. Images are of whole-mount in situ hybridization results using DIG-labeled antisense (a, b, e) and sense (c, d, f) RNA probes of Sjfs800. Sjfs800 transcripts in S. japonicum of 24 dpi males and females were detected using DIG-labeled RNA probes. Abundant transcription of Sjfs800 was observed in the vitellarium. Abbreviations: ov, ovary; vt, vitellarium; t, testis. Scale-bars: a, c, e, 200 μm; b, d, f, 100 μm

qPCR analysis of Sjfs800 mRNA levels after Sjfs800-specific siRNA transfection in female S. japonicum at 28 dpi

The Sjfs800 mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR to determine the effects of the Sjfs800-specific siRNA transfection. First, the paired 28-dpi worms were transfected with one of the three siRNAs (siRNA1-3) targeting Sjfs800. After 3 days of cultivation, Sjfs800 gene transcript levels were determined by qPCR. The reduction in Sjfs800 transcription level following transfection with siRNA1 was 60% of that in the mock-transfected group and negative control group, which was the highest efficiency among the three siRNAs tested (Fig. 4a). Thus, Sjfs800-specific siRNA1 was used in the ensuing experiments. Worms were transfected with Sjfs800-specific siRNA1 or scrambled siRNA in vitro. The results of the qPCR analysis indicated that compared with the scrambled siRNA control group, the Sjfs800-specific siRNA1-treated group showed an approximately 60% reduction in Sjfs800 mRNA levels on the 10 days later, and this experiment was repeated three times (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effects of Sjfs800-specific siRNA transfection. a To determine the Sfs800-specific siRNA with the best interference efficiency in vitro as measured using qPCR, 28-dpi worms were transfected with one of three siRNAs (siRNA1-3) and were harvested 3 days later. The qPCR results showed the effects of siRNA1 were reduced by nearly 60% compared with those in the mock-transfected group (F(4, 10) = 1525, P < 0.0001). b Effects of siRNA1 on Sjfs800 mRNA levels in worms were tested 10 days later. Sjfs800 mRNA levels were normalized to the endogenous control SjPSMD4. The qPCR analysis results showed that the Sjfs800 mRNA levels in the group transfected with Sjfs800 siRNA1 were reduced by approximately 60% compared with those in the scrambled siRNA-transfected group (F(2, 6) = 1251, P < 0.0001). Asterisks show statistical differences (**P < 0.01) tested by one-way ANOVA, compared to the mock group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (three biological replicates)

Effects of Sjfs800 knockdown on pairing rate, egg production and reproductive organ development

The number of male–female paired worms was counted on the day 10 after siRNA transfection to determine the effect of knocking down the Sjfs800 gene on the pairing rate. We found that the pairing rate in the Sjfs800-specific siRNA1-transfected group was significantly lower than that in the scrambled siRNA- transfected group (Fig. 5a). The numbers of paired worms in each group for each experiment are given in Additional file 7: Table S6. In addition, the number of eggs collected in the medium and counted using light microscopy was reduced approximately 50% in the Sjfs800-specific siRNA1 transfected group compared with that in the scrambled siRNA transfected group (Fig. 5b). After 10 days of Sjfs800-specific siRNA1 treatment, paired females were collected to count the number of eggs in the female uterus by using light microscopy. The results indicated that the number of eggs in female uterus per couple was also decreased approximately 50% compared with the group transfected with scrambled (Fig. 5c). The morphological changes in the vitellarium of Sjfs800 siRNA1-treated worms were observed using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The vitellarium was well developed in female worms that were transfected with scrambled siRNA. By contrast, transfection with Sjfs800 siRNA1 suppressed the development and maturation of the vitellarium, with fewer mature vitelline cells found in the Sjfs800 siRNA1-treated females than in the controls (Fig. 6). The number of eggs was decreased in the uterus of female worms that were transfected with Sjfs800 siRNA1 compared to the scrambled group. However, there were no significant ovarian morphology changes in the interference group compared to the scrambled group.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Effects of Sjfs800 knockdown on pairing rate, egg production and reproductive organ development. a The male–female pairing rate of worms transfected with Sjfs800 siRNA1 was reduced by approximately 70% compared with the rate in the scrambled siRNA-treated group (F(2, 6) = 660.9, P < 0.0001). b The eggs in the culture medium were collected on day 10 and counted using light microscopy. SiNCTRL represents negative control siRNA group; SiCTRL represents scrambled siRNA (F(2, 6) = 36.81, P = 0.0004). c The eggs in female uterus per couple were determined using light microscopy after 10 days of cultivation (F(2, 6) = 66.59, P < 0.0001). Asterisks show statistical differences (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01) tested by one-way ANOVA, compared to the mock group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments three biological replicates

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Confocal scanning laser microscopy images of the vitellarium in S. japonicum females after transfection with Sjfs800 siRNA1. a Vitellarium from worms transfected with scrambled siRNA. b Vitellarium from worms transfected with Sjfs800 siRNA1. Arrows in a, b point to vitelline follicles. c Ovary from worms transfected with scrambled siRNA. d Ovary from worms transfected with Sjfs800 siRNA1. Arrow indicates ovary. e Uterus from worms transfected with scrambled siRNA; f Uterus from worms transfected with Sjfs800 siRNA1. Arrows in e, f point to uterus. Abbreviations: vi, vitelline; ov, ovary; u, uterus. Scale-bars: 25 μm

Discussion

Paired adult female schistosomes produce a large number of eggs, which are primarily responsible for the schistosomiasis disease pathology and are critical for dissemination of the disease. The reproductive system of female schistosomes has been widely studied at the molecular level, and several studies have described transcriptomes that are differentially expressed before and after pairing in female schistosomes [16, 2330]. For example, SmFst (follistatin of S. mansoni) was recently identified as a regulatory molecule in the transforming growth factor β pathway that is pairing dependently transcribed in the male gonad, likely facilitating processes leading to male competence [23]. Lu et al. [25] described pairing-induced processes within the gonads, including stem cell-associated and neural functions, by analyzing gonad-specific and pairing-dependent transcriptomes.

In the present study, gene microarray analysis was used to screen for differentially expressed genes pre-pairing and initial pairing females and females at oviposition of the S. japonicum female. We found the transcript profiles in 16-dpi females (pre-pairing) were similar to those at 18 dpi (initial pairing). However, substantial changes in gene expression were observed in 24-dpi females (oviposition), indicating that virgin female schistosomes undergo marked changes in gene expression before they complete maturation. Genes involved in reproduction, such as those associated with the cell cycle, egg formation and protein synthesis, were substantially upregulated in the adult female trematodes. The female gene expression patterns reflects that the female is ready to produce eggs after pairing which is consistent with findings of others [16, 2330].

The vitellarium, which occupies the posterior two-thirds of the female schistosome body, produces vitellocytes. Vitellocytes supply nutrition to the developing zygote and constituents essential to egg shell construction. Mature vitellocytes join with fertilized oocytes in the ootype, which is where mature eggs are formed [31]. Thus, the development of the vitellarium plays essential roles in the production of schistosome eggs. Vitellarium is a flatworm-specific evolutionary innovation, so it could potentially be used as a specific therapeutics target [31].

Although the development of the vitellarium is a complicated process regulated by numerous molecules, an aim of the present study was to screen for some key molecules related to the development of the vitellarium. The results of our gene microarray analyses showed that the top 30 genes with respect to transcript abundance in 24-dpi females included representatives with proven roles in vitellarium development and egg production, including eggshell precursor protein, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Sjfs800. In 2017, Wang et al. [16] mapped the dynamic transcriptome changes in male and female from pairing to maturation, to identify biogenic amines and insect-like hormones that regulate reproduction development in S. japonicum. They also found that eggshell precursor protein, SOD and Sjfs800 were highly expressed in paired females. However, that study focused on biogenic amine neurotransmitters of males, which can control and maintain pairing with females by using the nervous system. In addition, insect-like hormones were shown to regulate the reproductive development of females [16]. In the present study, we aimed to determine the role of some of the genes related to vitellarium development in the production of schistosome eggs.

Smfs800 gene was first found and identified by Reis et al. [32], who also used in situ hybridization to determine that Smfs800 mRNA was expressed only in female vitelline cells, suggesting that Smfs800 may play role in egg development. However, little is known about the functions of Sjfs800 in vitellarium development and egg production. In the present study, Sjfs800 mRNA can be located in mature vitelline cells. Some developmental defects, especially a reduced number of mature vitelline cells in the vitellarium, were observed after Sjfs800 gene knockdown by siRNA, and the pairing rate and oviposition rate were also significantly decreased. Therefore, we conclude that Sjfs800 is vital for vitelline cell development and maturation and that maturation of the vitellarium is required for S. japonicum females to produce eggs. The number male–female pairings was reduced by approximately 70% after Sjfs800 siRNA transfection. The results of some studies have indicated that Sjfs800 may be a molecule downstream of S. japonicum Nanos1 or Abl tyrosine kinase activity [13, 33, 34]. However, the signaling pathway regulating vitellarium development centered on fs800 still needs further study.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study showed substantial differences in the expression levels of some genes in the S. japonicum female before and after male–female pairing, including genes related to vitellarium development, which can affect pairing, sexual maturation and egg production. These results provide a deeper understanding of the reproductive biology of schistosomes and may lead to the development of novel approaches for the prevention and treatment of schistosomiasis.

Supplementary information

13071_2019_3672_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (1.1MB, xlsx)

Additional file 1: Table S1. Probe sequence selected for chip hybridization.

13071_2019_3672_MOESM2_ESM.tif (5.9MB, tif)

Additional file 2: Figure S1. Images of a 16 dpi female (left) and a 16 dpi male (right) under a light microscope.

13071_2019_3672_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15.2KB, docx)

Additional file 3: Table S2. Number of paired and unpaired female worms on specific days after host infection. In order to establish Schistosoma japonicum infection model, each Kunming mouse was infected with around 70 cercariae. After 14, 15 16, 17 and 18 days infection, mice were killed. The worms were perfused through the hepatic portal vein using standard perfusion techniques. Finally, the number of females that male–female pairing and male–female unpairing were counted separately.

13071_2019_3672_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (186.4KB, xlsx)

Additional file 4: Table S3. 1138 sequences differentially expressed at initial pairing compared with the pre-pairing stage (FC ≥ 2).

13071_2019_3672_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (6.4MB, xlsx)

Additional file 5: Table S4. 43,870 sequences differentially expressed during the oviposition stage compared with the pre-pairing stage (FC ≥ 2).

13071_2019_3672_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (894.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 6: Table S5. 6713 sequences differentially expressed during the oviposition stage compared with the initial pairing stage (FC ≥ 2).

13071_2019_3672_MOESM7_ESM.docx (14.8KB, docx)

Additional file 7: Table S6. The number of paired worms after RNA interference.

Acknowledgements

We thank a native English speaker (Science/Medical English Editing for International Researchers) for modifying the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ANOVA

one-way analysis of variance

qPCR

real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Ct

threshold cycle

PSMD4

26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4

ISH

in situ hybridization

RNAi

RNA interference

CLSM

confocal laser scanning microscopy

Authors’ contributions

FL, HD and ML conceived and designed the trial. FL, HD, JT, CZ, XH and WS performed the experiments. FL, YD, CR and ML analyzed the data. ML drafted the first draft of the manuscript. JJS critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81271865), Key University Science Research Project of Anhui Province of China (KJ2016A333) and Scientific Research of BSKY from Anhui Medical University (XJ201321). Sponsors had no role in study design, or collection, analysis and interpretation of data.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the results are included within the article and its additional files.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed on animals within this study were conducted using animal husbandry guidelines approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (LLSC20140060).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Fengchun Liu and Han Ding contributed equally to this work

Contributor Information

Fengchun Liu, Email: liuberylfeng@qq.com.

Han Ding, Email: 1468603113@qq.com.

Jiaming Tian, Email: jiaming1611@qq.com.

Congyu Zhou, Email: 1406270245@qq.com.

Fei Yang, Email: 546293093@qq.com.

Wei Shao, Email: WeiShao0218@163.com.

Yinan Du, Email: duyinannan@126.com.

Xin Hou, Email: houxin45@mail.ustc.edu.cn.

Cuiping Ren, Email: cuipingren@126.com.

Jijia Shen, Email: shenjijia@hotmail.com.

Miao Liu, Email: iammiaoliu@126.com.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13071-019-3672-8.

References

  • 1.Gryseels B, Polman K, Clerinx J, Kestens L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2006;368:1106–1118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weerakoon KG, Gobert GN, Cai P, McManus DP. Advances in the diagnosis of human schistosomiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:939–967. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00137-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Colley DG, Bustinduy AL, Secor WE, King CH. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet. 2014;383:2253–2264. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61949-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.King CH, Dangerfield-Cha M. The unacknowledged impact of chronic schistosomiasis. Chronic Illn. 2008;4:65–79. doi: 10.1177/1742395307084407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kasinathan RS, Greenberg RM. Pharmacology and potential physiological significance of schistosome multidrug resistance transporters. Exp Parasitol. 2012;132:2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Doenhoff MJ, Pica-Mattoccia L. Praziquantel for the treatment of schistosomiasis: its use for control in areas with endemic disease and prospects for drug resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2006;4:199–210. doi: 10.1586/14787210.4.2.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Melman SD, Steinauer ML, Cunningham C, Kubatko LS, Mwangi IN, Wynn NB, et al. Reduced susceptibility to praziquantel among naturally occurring Kenyan isolates of Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wilson MS, Mentink-Kane MM, Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Thompson R, Wynn TA. Immunopathology of schistosomiasis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85:148–154. doi: 10.1038/sj.icb.7100014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang S, Spear RC. Exploring the impact of infection-induced immunity on the transmission of Schistosoma japonicum in hilly and mountainous environments in China. Acta Trop. 2014;133:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.King CH, Sutherland LJ, Bertsch D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of chemical-based mollusciciding for control of Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.LoVerde PT, Andrade LF, Oliveira G. Signal transduction regulates schistosome reproductive biology. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12:422–428. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beckmann S, Buro C, Dissous C, Hirzmann J, Grevelding CG. The Syk kinase SmTK4 of Schistosoma mansoni is involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis and oogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000769. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buro C, Oliveira KC, Lu Z, Leutner S, Beckmann S, Dissous C, et al. Transcriptome analyses of inhibitor-treated schistosome females provide evidence for cooperating Src-kinase and TGFbeta receptor pathways controlling mitosis and eggshell formation. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003448. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vanderstraete M, Gouignard N, Cailliau K, Morel M, Hahnel S, Leutner S, et al. Venus kinase receptors control reproduction in the platyhelminth parasite Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004138. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ding H, Liu F, Zhu L, Wu F, Liu Q, He S, et al. Tyrosine kinase 4 is involved in the reproduction of the platyhelminth parasite Schistosoma japonicum. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:498. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2453-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang J, Yu Y, Shen H, Qing T, Zheng Y, Li Q, et al. Dynamic transcriptomes identify biogenic amines and insect-like hormonal regulation for mediating reproduction in Schistosoma japonicum. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14693. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.LoVerde PT. Sex and schistosomes: an interesting biological interplay with control implications. J Parasitol. 2002;88:3–13. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0003:PASASA]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armstrong JC. Mating behavior and development of schistosomes in the mouse. J Parasitol. 1965;51:605–616. doi: 10.2307/3276242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu S, Cai P, Hou N, Piao X, Wang H, Hung T, Chen Q. Genome-wide identification and characterization of a panel of housekeeping genes in Schistosoma japonicum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2012;182:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cogswell AA, Collins JJ, 3rd, Newmark PA, Williams DL. Whole mount in situ hybridization methodology for Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2011;178:46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Da’dara AA, Skelly PJ. Gene suppression in schistosomes using RNAi. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1201:143–164. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1438-8_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang W, Zhang P, Liu M, Ren CP, Shen J. Worm morphology of Schistosoma japonicum using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Helminthol. 2012;86:317–322. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X11000447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moertel L, McManus DP, Piva TJ, Young L, McInnes RL, Gobert GN. Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of strain- and gender-associated gene expression in the human blood fluke, Schistosoma japonicum. Mol Cell Probes. 2006;20:280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leutner S, Oliveira KC, Rotter B, Beckmann S, Buro C, Hahnel S, et al. Combinatory microarray and SuperSAGE analyses identify pairing-dependently transcribed genes in Schistosoma mansoni males, including follistatin. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu Z, Sessler F, Holroyd N, Hahnel S, Quack T, Berriman M, et al. Schistosome sex matters: a deep view into gonad-specific and pairing-dependent transcriptomes reveals a complex gender interplay. Sci Rep. 2016;6:311–350. doi: 10.1038/srep31150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cai P, Liu S, Piao X, Hou N, You H, McManus DP, Chen Q. A next-generation microarray further reveals stage-enriched gene expression pattern in the blood fluke Schistosoma japonicum. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1947-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Waisberg M, Lobo FP, Cerqueira GC, Passos LK, Carvalho OS, Franco GR, et al. Microarray analysis of gene expression induced by sexual contact in Schistosoma mansoni. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun J, Wang SW, Li C, Hu W, Ren YJ, Wang JQ. Transcriptome profilings of female Schistosoma japonicum reveal significant differential expression of genes after pairing. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:881–892. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3719-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dillon GP, Feltwell T, Skelton JP, Ashton PD, Coulson PS, Quail MA, et al. Microarray analysis identifies genes preferentially expressed in the lung schistosomulum of Schistosoma mansoni. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Williams DL, Sayed AA, Bernier J, Birkeland SR, Cipriano MJ, Papa AR, et al. Profiling Schistosoma mansoni development using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) Exp Parasitol. 2007;117:246–258. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang J, Collins JR. Identification of new markers for the Schistosoma mansoni vitelline lineage. Int J Parasitol. 2016;46:405–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Reis MG, Kuhns J, Blanton R, Davis AH. Localization and pattern of expression of a female specific mRNA in Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989;32:113–119. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(89)90062-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Buro C, Beckmann S, Oliveira KC, Dissous C, Cailliau K, Marhofer RJ, et al. Imatinib treatment causes substantial transcriptional changes in adult Schistosoma mansoni in vitro exhibiting pleiotropic effects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu Q, Zhu L, Liu F, Hua M, Ding H, He S, et al. Function of Nanos1 gene in the development of reproductive organs of Schistosoma japonicum. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:1505–1513. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5427-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13071_2019_3672_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (1.1MB, xlsx)

Additional file 1: Table S1. Probe sequence selected for chip hybridization.

13071_2019_3672_MOESM2_ESM.tif (5.9MB, tif)

Additional file 2: Figure S1. Images of a 16 dpi female (left) and a 16 dpi male (right) under a light microscope.

13071_2019_3672_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15.2KB, docx)

Additional file 3: Table S2. Number of paired and unpaired female worms on specific days after host infection. In order to establish Schistosoma japonicum infection model, each Kunming mouse was infected with around 70 cercariae. After 14, 15 16, 17 and 18 days infection, mice were killed. The worms were perfused through the hepatic portal vein using standard perfusion techniques. Finally, the number of females that male–female pairing and male–female unpairing were counted separately.

13071_2019_3672_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (186.4KB, xlsx)

Additional file 4: Table S3. 1138 sequences differentially expressed at initial pairing compared with the pre-pairing stage (FC ≥ 2).

13071_2019_3672_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (6.4MB, xlsx)

Additional file 5: Table S4. 43,870 sequences differentially expressed during the oviposition stage compared with the pre-pairing stage (FC ≥ 2).

13071_2019_3672_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (894.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 6: Table S5. 6713 sequences differentially expressed during the oviposition stage compared with the initial pairing stage (FC ≥ 2).

13071_2019_3672_MOESM7_ESM.docx (14.8KB, docx)

Additional file 7: Table S6. The number of paired worms after RNA interference.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the results are included within the article and its additional files.


Articles from Parasites & Vectors are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES