Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 5;6(4):ENEURO.0421-18.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0421-18.2019

Table 5.

Correlation analysis of each Gompertz growth model and SM content

Region Parameter Pearson’s r p value
Frontal WM α 0.08 0.580
β –0.51 <0.001***
γ –0.21 0.147
δ –0.22 0.128
Temporal WM α 0.04 0.790
β –0.99 <0.001***
γ –0.83 <0.001***
δ 0.29 0.040*
Parietal WM α 0.37 0.008**
β –0.90 <0.001***
γ –0.99 <0.001***
δ –0.97 <0.001***
Occipital WM α 0.13 0.170
β –0.99 <0.001***
γ –0.45 0.001***
δ 0.36 0.012*
Cerebellar WM α 0.99 <0.001***
β –0.68 <0.001***
γ –0.83 <0.001***
δ 0.31 0.026*
Corpus callosum (body) α 0.37 0.009**
β –0.94 <0.001***
γ –0.99 <0.001***
δ –0.99 <0.001***
Corpus callosum (genu) α 0.17 0.240
β –0.73 <0.001***
γ –0.43 0.002**
δ –0.74 <0.001***
Corpus callosum (splenium) α 0.52 0.001***
β –0.85 <0.001***
γ –0.99 <0.001***
δ –0.99 <0.001***

The four Gompertz curve parameters indicate the initial onset of growth (β), initial growth rate (γ), a second reflection where growth begins to slow considerably (α), and a final linear growth rate (δ); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.