Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2019 Jun 13;33(6):862–871. doi: 10.1037/neu0000551

Table 3:

Wave 1 model comparisons

Model −2LL df AlC Δχ2 Δ df p
Full Cholesky 18426 7247 3931.7 --- --- ---
Reduced Cholesky 18427 7265 3896.7 0.89 18 1
Single Factor 19199 7290 4619.4 772.8 25 <.001
Correlated Factor 18445 7282 3880.7 18.1 17 0.38
Higher Order 18447 7284 3878.5 19.9 19 0.40

The reduced Cholesky is compared to the full Cholesky. All other models are compared to the reduced Cholesky. −2LL = Negative Log-Likelihood; df = degrees of freedom; AIC = Akaike information criterion; Δχ2= likelihood ratio test (difference in −2LL between the model and its comparison model); Δdf = difference in df between the model and its comparison model. Best fitting model is shown in bold font.