Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins organize interaction networks in the cell in many regulation and signaling processes. These proteins often gain structure upon binding to their target proteins in multistep reactions involving the formation of both secondary and tertiary structure. To understand the interactions of disordered proteins, we need to understand the mechanisms of these coupled folding and binding reactions. We studied helix formation in the binding of the molten globule-like nuclear coactivator binding domain and the disordered interaction domain from activator of thyroid hormone and retinoid receptors. We demonstrate that helix formation in a rapid binding reaction can be followed by stopped-flow synchrotron-radiation circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and describe the design of such a beamline. Fluorescence-monitored binding experiments of activator of thyroid hormone and retinoid receptors and nuclear coactivator binding domain display several kinetic phases, including one concentration-independent phase, which is consistent with an intermediate stabilized at high ionic strength. Time-resolved CD experiments show that almost all helicity is formed upon initial association of the proteins or separated from the encounter complex by only a small energy barrier. Through simulation of mechanistic models, we show that the intermediate observed at high ionic strength likely involves a structural rearrangement with minor overall changes in helicity. Our experiments provide a benchmark for simulations of coupled binding reactions and demonstrate the feasibility of using synchrotron-radiation CD for mechanistic studies of protein-protein interactions.
Significance
We report, to our knowledge, the first experimental setup for following biomolecular reactions by synchrotron-radiation circular dichroism spectroscopy. We use this setup to characterize the mechanism of coupled folding and binding of two intrinsically disordered proteins. We show that almost all helicity is formed in the initial binding reaction and that the kinetic intermediates observed previously involve a rearrangement of helices. The experimental setup is likely to be of use to a range of biochemical reactions, and our findings on the binding reactions will serve as an experimental benchmark for future computational studies.
Introduction
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are abundant in eukaryotic proteomes and govern key cellular processes such as cell cycle regulation, cell growth, and development (1). These proteins contribute to the complexity of the interaction networks within cells by interacting with several ligands, acting as scaffold proteins, and presenting accessible sites for posttranslational modifications. In total, these mechanisms allow IDPs to form complexes that are responsive to cellular cues (2). The functions of IDPs often require them to bind specifically to other proteins, but the specificity does not stem from a fixed tertiary structure as in folded proteins. To understand the specificity of IDP interactions, it is necessary to understand how they recognize their partners (3, 4).
Binding reactions of IDPs involve at least two processes: binding and folding. This prompts the question of what occurs first, binding or folding? This question resembles the two paradigmatic models of binding reactions developed to describe substrate recognition in enzymes. In the conformation selection model, the structural change is required for binding, which means that the protein folds independently and then binds to its partner. In the induced fit model, the protein binds in a disordered state and folds while remaining bound (5). IDPs are unlikely to adopt a tertiary conformation identical to the complex before binding. However, they often sample native-like conformations in the disordered state, and transient helices are particularly common. To understand coupled binding and folding mechanistically, we have to describe when in the reaction secondary structure and stabilizing intermolecular interactions are formed.
IDPs rarely bind exclusively through induced fit or conformational selection. More likely, the binding reactions follow parallel pathways in which the flux through the pathways may vary with the conditions. The structural changes that accompany coupled folding and binding are much larger than for substrate binding. They often involve the association of multiple independent segments and formation of secondary structure in both partners. Coupled folding and binding reactions are thus inherently multistate, and the reaction often involves several intermediates with varying degrees of native or nonnative (6, 7) secondary and tertiary structure. Kinetic studies can, in principle, resolve intermediates because their formation and breakdown will result in distinct kinetic phases, but in practice, this is not always the case. The ability to resolve different kinetic phases depends both on suitable probes for the reaction steps and the time resolution of the experiment (8). Therefore, technical limitations often prevent decomposition of the binding pathway into multiple steps. As in protein folding, many reactions thus appear as simple two-state reactions in which intermediates are not detected experimentally (9). To maximize mechanistic information, a reaction mechanism should therefore ideally be described using several observables that report on different types of structure formation.
One of the best studied coupled folding and binding reactions is that between the nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from CREB-binding protein (CREBBP) and the interaction domain from activator of thyroid hormone and retinoid receptors (ACTR). In the complex, NCBD forms a three-helix bundle, around which ACTR wraps three short helices without intramolecular tertiary contacts (Fig. 1) (10). In the unbound state, ACTR is highly disordered but has transient helicity in the first helix of the complex (11, 12). Free NCBD is usually described as a molten globule (12, 13, 14) but has a propensity to form a partially ordered structure resembling the complex with ACTR (15, 16). The binding reaction thus involves association of the proteins, formation of helices in ACTR, formation of intermolecular interactions, and rigidification of the helices and tertiary structure of NCBD.
Figure 1.
The NMR structure of NCBD (blue) in complex with ACTR (red) with the Trp probe in NCBD highlighted. The figure was created in PyMOL using Protein Data Bank (PDB): 1KBH (10). To see this figure in color, go online.
Kinetic experiments are needed to extract information about reaction mechanisms (17). The reaction between ACTR and NCBD has been studied by stopped-flow fluorimetry and single-molecule förster resonance energy transfer methods, which showed that the reaction contains multiple intermediates that give rise to observable kinetic phases (8, 18, 19, 20). Three kinetic phases can be resolved in the timescale of stopped-flow measurements. One is a concentration-dependent phase, which occurs on a shorter timescale than the other phases under our experimental conditions and is hence termed “fast” (λfast), and is mainly determined by the association rate constant, kon. Furthermore, a concentration-independent phase can be detected under certain conditions over an “intermediate” timescale (λintermediate, τ ≈ 30 ms at 4°C). Finally, a slower concentration-independent phase related to an unknown conformational change is observed on the second timescale (λslow, τ ≈ 1 s at 4°C) (8). The transition state of the initial association is largely disordered, although the first helix of ACTR is partially formed (18, 21). Single-molecule measurements suggest that additional slower phases occur because of proline cis-trans isomerization (19). The binding reaction between NCBD and ACTR has been the subject of multiple simulation studies using both coarse-grained and atomistic models (22, 23, 24, 25). These simulations suggest that various intermediates occur on the reaction pathway with varying degrees of native-like secondary structure. It is currently not clear whether the intermediates observed in kinetic studies and in simulations are the same species.
Kinetic studies of folding and binding reactions usually rely on fluorescence changes as the detectable signal. Fluorescence has a large signal/noise ratio, and many proteins have suitable aromatic residues in binding interfaces that change fluorescence properties upon binding. For proteins without aromatic amino acids in the interfaces, it is often possible to engineer a suitable reporter by conjugation to an extrinsic dye (26, 27, 28) or introduction of a tryptophan residue as, for example, done for NCBD (8). Fluorescence reports on the local environment around the fluorophore and is thus insensitive to structural changes occurring in the rest of the protein. Furthermore, the fluorescence intensity changes are combined effects of solvation and quenching interactions around the fluorophore. The fluorescence intensity changes of partial reactions are thus not necessarily reliable reporters of structural changes. It would therefore be desirable to have other time-resolved observables with a different dependence on structural changes.
Far-ultraviolet (UV) circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy reports on secondary structure changes in proteins. Stopped-flow CD can report on secondary structure formation during, for example, a protein-folding reaction. Compared to fluorescence detection, CD spectroscopy is much less sensitive and typically requires a 10-fold higher protein concentration. This may be feasible for kinetic studies on folding of monomeric proteins because the folding rate is concentration independent. Bimolecular binding reactions, however, are usually concentration dependent. A 10-fold increase of the concentration of one binding partner thus results in a 10-fold increase in the initial reaction rate. Thus, an increase in the concentration moves the reaction outside the range that can be captured with the stopped-flow technique. This problem can in principle be solved by increasing the sensitivity of stopped-flow CD. For static measurements, synchrotron-radiation CD (SRCD) has been used to increase the intensity of the light source, which extends the CD spectrum to lower wavelengths and permits the use of lower sample concentrations (29).
Here, we report the development of a stopped-flow CD setup coupled to a high-intensity UV beamline. We use this setup to follow the formation of helical structure in the coupled folding and binding reaction between ACTR and NCBD. We show that helix formation is coupled to the initial association and that slower kinetic phases likely arise from subtle rearrangements of helical complexes. To our knowledge, this is the first application of time-resolved SRCD to coupled folding and binding reactions and suggests that the approach can be used to study structural changes accompanying many other rapid binding reactions.
Materials and Methods
Protein expression and purification
The expression plasmids carried the complementary DNA sequences of the interaction domain from human ACTR (corresponding to amino acid residues 1023–1093 in UniProt Q9Y6Q9-1) and NCBD from human CREBBP (residues 2058–2116 in UniProt Q92793-1) (Fig. 1). The expression constructs were N-terminally tagged with a 6xHis-lipoyl domain. The plasmids were transformed into One Shot BL21(DE3)pLysS Chemically Competent Escherichia coli cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and selected on Luria broth agar with 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 35 μg/mL chloramphenicol. The cells were grown in Luria broth media with 50 μg/mL ampicillin at 37°C while shaking until OD600 reached a value of around 0.6. After addition of 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyanoside, the proteins were expressed overnight at 18°C while shaking. The cells were lysed by sonication and the lysate was separated on a Ni Sepharose 6 Fast Flow resin (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) equilibrated with 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 500 mM NaCl as the binding buffer, and 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 500 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazole as the elution buffer. After cleavage of the 6xHis-lipoyl domain with thrombin (GE Healthcare), the protein was subjected to separation on the Ni sepharose 6 Fast Flow resin using the same buffers as above to separate the protein from the cleaved tag. The proteins were further separated on a C8 reversed-phase column (Vydac, Columbia, MD) using a 0–70% acetonitrile gradient, and fractions containing pure proteins were lyophilized. The fractions were analyzed with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry to ensure the correct identity. The concentrations of the proteins were measured by A280 for proteins containing Trp or Tyr residues. The extinction coefficients were calculated using the ExPASy ProtParam online software (30). ACTR, which is lacking aromatic residues, was measured by A205, and the concentration was estimated using an extinction coefficient 250,000 M−1 cm−1.
Static SRCD spectroscopy
Lyophilized protein was dissolved in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with 150 mM NaF to reduce buffer absorbance at low wavelengths. The protein concentrations were 69 μM ACTR and 80 μM NCBD, which gives a maximum in absorbance of ∼1 in a 0.1-mm quartz cuvette. The exact pathlength of the cuvette was determined by an interference technique to be 0.1027 mm (31). The spectra were recorded on the AU-CD beamline, ASTRID2, at 25°C in three scans between 280 and 170 nm. A reference baseline spectrum of the buffer alone was subtracted, and all three spectra were averaged and mildly smoothed with a seven-point Savitzky-Golay filter (32).
The rSRCD facility used for stopped-flow SRCD measurements
The rapid SRCD (rSRCD) facility is located on the AU-rSRCD branch line of the AU-AMO beamline at the synchrotron-radiation facility ASTRID2 at Aarhus University in Denmark. Fig. 2 shows a schematic overview of the beamline. The source of this beamline has a 2.4-m-long undulator with a magnetic period of 53 mm, which, in combination with the relatively low electron energy of the ASTRID2 accelerator of 0.58 GeV, allows the generation of intense UV light up to a wavelength of 290 nm. The small divergence and narrow width of this UV light source makes it well suited for a stopped-flow instrument, where the internal light beam width must be kept below 1 mm. This can be achieved without any further optics than those in the AU-AMO monochromator, which selects the UV wavelength of interest. Note that this wavelength can be freely chosen below 300 nm and is thus not restricted as more conventional sources are in which intense single lines of a lamp limits the wavelength to certain discrete values. The UV light from the AU-AMO monochromator is directed into the rSRCD branch line via a flat MgF2 protected aluminum-coated mirror. This mirror has a sideways as well as a reflection angle adjustment, which makes easy alignment of the light into the stopped-flow instrument.
Figure 2.
Overview of the AU-AMO beamline and rSRCD branch line at the synchrotron-radiation facility ASTRID2, Aarhus University, Denmark. The beam is extracted from the existing beam line (AU-AMO) using a moveable plane mirror and connected to a commercial SX20 stopped-flow module. To see this figure in color, go online.
After the exit slit in the rSRCD branch line, which selects the wavelength from the grating in the monochromator, the light passes through a high-quality excimer laser-graded CaF2 window (VACOM, Großlöbichau, Germany). The window is cut perpendicular to the <111> crystal axis of CaF2 to minimize birefringence, which would otherwise change the polarization of the light. This window separates the ultrahigh vacuum of the AU-AMO beam line from the nitrogen-purged environment of the stopped-flow system.
The polarization of the light from the monochromator is nearly fully horizontally polarized, but to ensure 100% linear polarization, the light passes through a MgF2 Rochon polarizer (Bernhard Halle, Berlin, Germany). The following optical element, a photoelastic modulator (PEM; Hinds Instruments, Hillsboro, Oregon), converts the horizontally polarized light into alternating left- and right-handed circularly polarized light with a frequency close to 50 kHz. Thus, the CD signal of a chiral sample will oscillate in phase with this frequency and can be detected using a lock-in amplifier.
The stopped-flow instrument chosen for the rSRCD facility is a model SX20 from Applied Photophysics Limited (APL; Surry, United Kingdom), which can perform multiple fully automated mixing shots. The photomultiplier tube (PMT) and data acquisition electronics from APL record CD signal, with time resolutions down to 0.1 ms. The APL electronics control both the PMT high voltage and the PEM using the DataPro SX20 software. The wavelength of the beamline is set via the ASTRID2 control system software (ConSys), which can set both the monochromator and the undulator to the desired wavelength as well as directly access the APL software for setting the PEM to the correct setting for CD measurements.
The stopped-flow cell in the SX20 stopped-flow system is a clear quartz cell; mixing of dark and clear quartz, often used in fluorescence and UV visible spectroscopy absorption stopped-flow instruments, is avoided to minimize stress-induced birefringence in the quartz. This would otherwise interfere with the circular polarization state of the light and thus might lead to incorrect CD measurement. Careful masking of the clear quartz avoids light passing through the quartz, and thus not through the sample, to reach the PMT detector, which otherwise can lead to a falsely low apparent CD signal of the sample. The quartz cell can be oriented in two directions, with either 2 or 10 mm light pathlength. The former is used for most experiments. The two sample syringes and the quartz cell can be submerged in a water bath to set the sample temperature using a water cooler/heater. Typically, the temperature can be set between 5 and 50°C, with temperature oscillations of ∼0.1°C. The two mixing syringes of the SX20 system can readily be exchanged for either two 1-mL syringes or one 2.5-mL and one 0.25-mL syringes, thus providing either 1:1 or 1:10 mixing.
The flux of light entering the SX20 stopped-flow system has been measured with a Si diode (AXUV100G; Opto Diode, Camarillo, CA). At the optimum wavelength of 195 nm for following the binding of ACTR to NCBD (vide infra), the flux from the rSRCD branch of the AU-AMO line is 5 × 1013 photons per second into a beam size of 1 × 1 mm2. Because this beam size is smaller than the stopped-flow full aperture of 6 × 1.5 mm2, all of the flux enters the cell. In comparison, flux measurement carried out on a new high-flux Xe-arc lamp-based conventional CD instrument (Chirascan Plus; Applied Photophysics) gives a flux density at 195 nm of 2.5 × 1010 photons per second per mm2 (full beam size 8 × 11 mm2). This corresponds to roughly 2.5 × 1011 photons per second entering the stopped-flow aperture at a bandwidth of 1 nm (comparable to the rSRCD). Other light sources than Xe-arc lamps are frequently used on conventional CD instruments for stopped-flow applications. These include Xe-Hg lamps and even light-emitting diodes. Xe-Hg lamps have intense but discrete lines, and light-emitting diodes are single-line light sources, which may increase the flux by up to a factor of 10. However, none of these higher-intensity light sources are available below 200 nm. Therefore, we expect the light flux, which enters the rSRCD stopped-flow cell, to be at least 15 times (and below 200 nm, at least 100 times) higher than available from the best commercially available CD instrument/light source combinations, corresponding to more than 4–10 times better signal/noise ratios.
Calibration of the T0 of mixing of the rSRCD setup
To calibrate the dead time of the instrument, we studied the reaction between N-acetyltryptophan amide (NATA) with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS). This reaction is typically used to calibrate fluorescence-detecting stopped-flow instruments because it follows simple bimolecular kinetics and can be monitored optically because of the quenching of NATA fluorescence upon NBS binding. In this rSRCD setup, NATA/NBS reactions were followed by observation of the absorbance at 280 nm. Reactions were recorded for final concentrations of 20 μM NATA and NBS ranging from 100 to 1250 μM at 6°C. The kinetic traces were fitted to a single exponential function. The extrapolated crossing point of the exponential decays at different concentrations were taken as the real time zero in the experiment, which is 3 ms before the start of the data collection.
ACTR/NCBD binding monitored by rSRCD
The stopped-flow experiments were conducted in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) with 150 mM NaF (low ionic strength conditions, I ≈ 0.20 M) or with 0.90 M NaF (high ionic strength conditions, I ≈ 0.95 M). All experiments were performed at 5°C. In all experiments, the concentration of NCBDY2108W was held constant at 2.0 μM, and the ACTR concentration was varied between 1.7 and 6.9 μM. The analyzed kinetic traces were typically an average of >20 individual traces. The binding reaction was monitored with the CD signal at 195 nm.
Stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy
The fluorescence-monitored stopped-flow experiments were carried out on an upgraded SX-17MV stopped-flow-spectrometer (Applied Photophysics). The excitation wavelength was set to 280 nm, and the emitted light was passed through a 320-nm cut-off filter before detection. The buffer conditions and temperature were the same as for the stopped-flow CD measurements. The displacement experiments, in which koffapp was determined, were conducted using a premixed solution of 1 μM NCBDY2108W and 0.5 μM wild-type (WT) ACTR (∼0.5 μM complex) and using an excess of wild-type NCBD (up to 30-fold) to displace NCBDY2108W from the complex. Each analyzed kinetic trace was typically an average of six to eight individual traces. The real time zero was determined by mixing NATA with excess of NBS and monitoring the fluorescence emission. The kinetic traces were fitted to a single exponential function, and the intersection of the fitted lines was used as an estimate of the real time zero in the experiment, which was at −1.25 ms in relation to the first recorded data points.
Data analysis and fitting
The stopped-flow kinetic traces were fitted globally by numerical integration using KinTek Explorer (KinTek Corporation, Snow Shoe, PA) to extract values of the microscopic rate constants for the different models (33, 34). Confidence contour plots were computed to assess how constrained the parameters were for each fit. The confidence contour plots show the variation in the χ2 ratio (χ2min/χ2) as each parameter is varied individually while all other parameters are kept constant. Well-constrained parameters yield confidence contour plots with well-defined χ2 ratio maxima. The lower and upper confidence interval bounds were estimated from a (χ2min/χ2) ratio of 0.9, according to the recommendations in the KinTek user manual (https://www.kintekexplorer.com/docs/Kintek_Explorer_Instructions.pdf). The real time zero used for analysis was −1.25 ms for the fluorescence-monitored stopped-flow experiments and −3 ms for the CD-monitored stopped-flow experiments. The total mixing time (or dead time) in the respective stopped-flow experiment was 3.25 and 6 ms, respectively. This is the time between the real time zero and the first data points, which fall on the fitted single exponential curve. The ACTR/NCBD binding traces were fitted using scaling factors (multiplier or offset for fluorescence and CD data, respectively) to account for small fluctuations in lamp intensity and errors in concentration in the fluorescence-monitored measurements and offset intercept values in the CD-monitored data. Individual traces were fitted to either a single- (Eq. 1) or a double-exponential function (Eq. 2) in GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software).
| (1) |
| (2) |
where A is the amplitude of the kinetic phase, kobs is the observed rate constant, and t is time.
Results
Test of the SRCD operation using a standard sample
The CD performance of both the static and stopped-flow systems was checked by scanning a camphor sulfonic acid (CSA) sample between 190 and 300 nm. The 290.5 nm (positive) CD peak of CSA was used to calibrate the CD signal magnitude, whereas the 192 nm (negative) peak to 290.5 nm peak ratio was used to judge birefringence of the quartz cell. The first cell delivered with the SX20 instrument showed a ratio of close to 1, which is far from the 2.1 ratio often quoted for CSA (35). A screening of quartz cells performed by the manufacturer identified a cell with a CSA ratio close to 2, which is now in use at the beam line. The stopped-flow system on the rSRCD facility is therefore calibrated and documented down to 190 nm.
SRCD allows helix formation to be followed using lower wavelength bands
The coil-to-helix transition in ACTR upon binding to NCBD makes this reaction suited for CD. Previously, it was found that binding resulted in a large change in CD signal at 222 nm (10). We repeated these measurements using the static SRCD beamline, which allowed us to extend the spectrum to shorter wavelengths (Fig. 3). The spectral change in the reaction can be estimated by comparing the spectrum of the complex and the summed spectra of the individual proteins. This showed that although the reaction can be followed at 222 nm as is customary in benchtop instruments, a ∼3-fold larger change occurs at lower wavelengths. We thus followed the binding reaction at the wavelength with the maximal signal change at 195 nm (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.
Static CD spectra of free wild-type ACTR (red) (69 μM), free NCBDY2108W (green) (80 μM), the theoretical sum of free wild-type ACTR and free NCBDY2108W (purple), and wild-type ACTR (blue) in complex with NCBDY2108W (69 and 80 μM, respectively). The dotted line shows the zero level of the CD signal. To see this figure in color, go online.
Following the association reaction between ACTR and NCBD by rSRCD
To assign helix formation to the different kinetic phases of the binding pathway, we wanted to follow the binding reaction by rSRCD. We mainly performed kinetic experiments using a pseudo-wild-type NCBDY2108W, which enabled fluorescence detection of the reaction in a separate experiment. Previous experiments showed that this mutation does not affect the binding kinetics or secondary structure content of NCBD (8). The experimental conditions involve several trade-offs related to the protein concentrations that will likely be general to rSRCD experiments of coupled folding and binding. Increased protein concentration improves the signal but also increases the absorption and thus the noise. Large excess of one binding partner simplifies the reaction to a pseudo-first-order reaction but also increases the reaction rate and shifts part of the signal amplitude into the dead time. We mixed NCBD with a small excess of ACTR and observed the CD signal at 195 nm. The binding reaction gave rise to a detectable exponential decay. However, much of the reaction amplitude is lost because of a large artifactual signal such that the first 3 ms of the time trace had to be discarded (in addition to the 3 ms of the reaction occurring before the instrument starts recording data). The absolute CD signal displayed significant baseline shift from one acquisition to the next. This persisted in pure water, and we believe both of these artifacts arise because of small distortions of the cuvette when it is pressurized by the stopped-flow setup. Despite these limitations, we managed to obtain kinetic time traces for this binding reaction across a concentration range for the ligand in excess, such that kon could be determined.
Binding follows an apparent two-state mechanism at physiological ionic strength
The reaction between ACTR and NCBD has been previously studied by stopped-flow fluorimetry (8, 18, 21). The current rSRCD measurements were, however, conducted under different buffer conditions to reduce the absorption of buffer components at low wavelengths. To test whether the change in buffer conditions altered the reaction, we rerecorded kinetics using stopped-flow fluorimetry under identical conditions as used for the rSRCD experiments. The binding reaction was first measured at physiological ionic strength conditions (∼0.20 M). Under these conditions, the fluorescence-monitored stopped-flow traces were monophasic (Fig. 4 a) with a rate constant that increased linearly with increasing ACTR concentration and thus report on the bimolecular association. Previously, a slow (τ ≈ 1 s at 4°C) concentration-independent phase, λslow, was observed at physiological ionic strength (8). We did not probe this slow kinetic phase because rSRCD measurements resulted in radiation damage of the protein on the timescale in which it occurs (1–10 s).
Figure 4.
Stopped-flow kinetic traces of pseudo-wild-type NCBDY2108W and ACTR monitoring fluorescence intensity (blue) and CD195 (red) at low ionic strength conditions (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaF) at 5°C. Kinetic traces for 2.0 μM NCBD mixed with 5.2 μM ACTR are shown in (a) and (b). (a) The fast kinetic phase observed in the fluorescence-monitored data was fitted to a single exponential and yielded a kobs value of 124 ± 1 s−1. (b) The CD-monitored binding trace was fitted to a single exponential function with a kobs value of 157 ± 5 s−1. (c) A typical displacement experiment monitored by fluorescence in which 30 μM WT NCBD was used to displace NCBDY2108W from its complex with ACTR (∼0.5 μM complex) is shown. The kinetic traces were fitted to a single exponential function, and the residuals for the fit are shown below the plot. (d) The kinetic traces from displacement were fitted, and kobs values were plotted against the concentration of WT NCBD. The average of the kobs values at the three highest concentrations was taken as an estimate of koff, and the SD was taken as the error, resulting in an estimated koff = 2.05 ± 0.05 s−1. To see this figure in color, go online.
To monitor helix formation in the binding reaction, we first performed rSRCD experiments at physiological ionic strength. The reaction transient monitored via CD195 could be described by a single exponential (Fig. 4 b) with a rate constant linearly increasing with concentration. We obtained the association rate constant kon by varying the concentrations of ACTR and fitting the time traces globally to a two-state binding reaction using a numerical integration method. We note that the best-fit koff value obtained from the CD-monitored data was 25 s−1, which is substantially higher than for the fluorescence-monitored data. However, this is likely a result of the large experimental noise in the stopped-flow CD data, which causes an uncertainty in the globally fitted koff value. Accordingly, confidence contour analysis revealed that koff was not well constrained in the global fitting. Thus, koff is best determined in a separate displacement experiment (Fig. 4 c). Using fluorescence-monitored stopped flow, the displacement experiment yielded an estimated koff of 2.05 ± 0.05 s−1 (Fig. 4 d). The fitted value for kon was similar for the CD- and fluorescence-monitored binding reactions (Table 1) suggesting that fluorescence and CD signals report on the same apparent two-state transition. This shows that helix formation and binding are likely coupled or only separated by a low energy-barrier, which prevents these two steps from being resolved. In addition, we found that the NCBDY2108W pseudo-wild-type exhibited almost identical binding kinetics to wild-type NCBD when the reaction was monitored with the CD195 signal, which confirms that the Trp mutation does not influence the mechanism of interaction (8) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Fitted Rate Constants for the Binding Reactions of NCBD and ACTR
| NCBD Variant | ACTR Variant | Parameter | Best-Fit Value | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCBDY2108W | WT ACTR | kon | 27 μM−1 s−1 | 17 | 42 | SRCD stopped flow |
| kon | 30 μM−1 s−1 | 28 | 33 | fluorescence-monitored stopped flow | ||
| koffa | 2.05 s−1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | fluorescence-monitored stopped flow | ||
| WT NCBD | WT ACTR | kon | 28 μM−1 s−1 | 18 | 40 | SRCD stopped flow |
The conditions were 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaF, and the stopped-flow experiments were performed at 5°C. The association rate constants (kon) were obtained from fitting the stopped-flow time traces globally by numerical integration to a two-state binding mechanism. The confidence interval boundaries were calculated using a χ2 ratio threshold of 0.9 in all cases. NA, not applicable.
The koff value was determined in a separate fluorescence-monitored displacement experiment. Wild-type NCBD was used in large excess to displace NCBDY2108W from the complex with ACTR. The value of koff is the average from the three highest wild-type NCBD concentrations, and the error is the SD of these measurements.
Kinetic experiments at high ionic strength probe an additional reaction step
Previous studies revealed the presence of an additional concentration-independent kinetic phase, λintermediate (τ ≈ 30 ms at 4°C), at high ionic strength (∼0.95 M) (8). This suggests the presence of a salt-dependent, kinetic intermediate in the binding reaction of NCBD and ACTR. Before repeating these experiments by rSRCD, we performed fluorescence-monitored kinetic measurements of NCBDY2108W and wild-type ACTR in 0.90 M NaF. The resulting kinetic traces were clearly biphasic, as shown before in the presence of 0.90 M NaCl (8) (Fig. 5, a and b). Thus, fluorescence-monitored binding at 0.90 M NaF shows that the interaction between ACTR and NCBD is at least a two-step process described by the kinetic phases λfast and λintermediate. As previously mentioned, the radiation damage at longer timescales prevented studying λslow with rSRCD.
Figure 5.
Stopped-flow binding traces of pseudo-wild-type NCBDY2108W and ACTR at high ionic strength conditions (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.90 M NaF) at 5°C, monitored by fluorescence intensity (blue) or CD195 (red). The concentrations used in the experiments were 2.0 μM NCBD and 1.7–6.9 μM ACTR. Examples of traces are shown for 2.0 μM NCBD and 5.2 μM ACTR. (a) The fluorescence-monitored kinetic trace was fitted to a single exponential function, and the residual plot shows a clear deviation from a random distribution. (b) The fluorescence-monitored kinetic trace fitted to a double exponential function is shown. The residual plot shows a distribution that is close to random. The fitted kobs values were 152 ± 2 s−1 for λfast and 23.1 ± 0.2 s−1 for λintermediate. (c) The CD-monitored trace was apparently monophasic and was fitted to a single exponential function yielding an apparent kobs value of 73 ± 3 s−1. (d) Plotting the fitted rate constants from the fluorescence-monitored kinetic experiments (blue dots) against a concentration of ACTR revealed one concentration-dependent kinetic phase, which reports on the binding event, and one concentration-independent phase with a kobs of around 20 s−1. The fitted rate constant from the CD-monitored experiments (red dots) showed an approximately linear dependence on ACTR concentration but with a lower apparent konapp value. The solid lines represent the fits of the fluorescence and CD-monitored data to an equation for bimolecular association (40), which was used to extract the konapp values reported in this figure. The observed rate constants from the CD-monitored experiments are likely weighted averages of λfast and λintermediate. To see this figure in color, go online.
In principle, one could differentiate between induced fit and conformational selection if the fluorescence yields of the molecular species in the reaction were known. Because this information is not known, we cannot infer a mechanism from the amplitude information in a fluorescence-monitored experiment. On the other hand, amplitudes obtained in a CD-monitored experiment are directly related to the amount of helicity in the protein. Thus, to probe helix formation in the different steps of the binding reaction, stopped-flow measurements at high ionic strength were conducted monitoring the CD195. The stopped-flow CD traces were apparently monophasic under high ionic strength conditions, and no intermediate kinetic phase was observed (Fig. 5 c). However, plotting the fitted kobs values against concentration of ACTR showed that the apparent kon (konapp) from the SRCD stopped-flow experiments was distinctively lower than konapp from the fluorescence-monitored experiments (Fig. 5 d). This suggests that the fast and intermediate kinetic phases cannot be resolved at this noise level. The apparent kobs value from the fit of a single exponential function to CD195 thus constitutes an average of the kobs values from λfast and λintermediate weighted by their fractional amplitude. This likely results in the apparently lower konapp observed for the CD-monitored stopped-flow data. In fact, the same phenomenon was observed in fluorescence-monitored binding experiments when NCBD was in excess over ACTR (5).
Induced fit and conformational selection have a different order of concentration-dependent and -independent steps and can thus occasionally be distinguished from global fits of experimental traces recorded over a concentration series (Fig. 6 b). The kinetic traces from experiments at high ionic strength were fitted globally by numerical integration to either an induced fit or a conformational selection model to extract the rate constants associated with the steps in the respective three-state model (Fig. 6, a and b; Table 2). Based solely on the fluorescence-monitored data, one of these models could not be preferred over the other. The confidence contour analysis suggested that the parameters were more well constrained for the induced fit model, and k−1 was not well constrained in the fit to the conformational selection model (Fig. 6 c). Neither of these two-step models describe the data perfectly, but the deviation from a perfect fit was deemed too small to invoke more steps in the mechanism.
Figure 6.
Stopped-flow fluorescence-monitored data recorded at high ionic strength conditions (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.90 M NaF) at 5°C. The concentration of pseudo-wild-type NCBDY2108W was held constant at 2.0 μM, and ACTR was varied between 1.7 and 6.9 μM. (a and b) The data set was fitted globally by numerical integration to either an induced fit model (left panel) or a conformational selection model (right panel). We use an asterisk to denote a molecular species that has undergone a structural rearrangement. Three out of seven traces are shown in the figure for clarity. The residual plots for each fit are shown below the curve. Based on the residual plot, both models fit the data equally well, and best-fit parameters are shown in the respective scheme. (c) Confidence contour plots for each fitted model show that the value for the parameter k−1 was poorly constrained in the fit to the conformational selection model as judged by the absence of a well-defined maximum in the χ2min/χ2 ratio. The dotted gray line shows the χ2 ratio threshold of 0.9, which was used to calculate the lower and upper 95% confidence bounds. To see this figure in color, go online.
Table 2.
Fitted Rate Constants for Binding Reactions of NCBDY2108W and Wild-Type ACTR
| Model | Parameter | Best-Fit Value | Lower Bound | Upper Bound |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induced fit | k+1 | 33 μM−1 s−1 | 26 | 41 |
| k−1 | 9.3 s−1 | 3.0 | 20 | |
| k+2 | 15 s−1 | 3.2 | 22 | |
| k−2 | 9.3 s−1 | 6.5 | 17 | |
| scaling factor 1 | (1.0) | NA | NA | |
| scaling factor 2 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| scaling factor 3 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| scaling factor 4 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| scaling factor 5 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | |
| scaling factor 6 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.98 | |
| scaling factor 7 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | |
| Conformational selection | k+1 | 25 s−1 | 20 | 31 |
| k−1 | 6.9 s−1 | 1.2 | 13 | |
| k+2 | 29 μM−1 s−1 | 27 | 36 | |
| k−2 | 1.7 s−1 | 1.1 | 2.7 | |
| scaling factor 1 | (1.0) | NA | NA | |
| scaling factor 2 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| scaling factor 3 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
| scaling factor 4 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
| scaling factor 5 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| scaling factor 6 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| scaling factor 7 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
The stopped-flow experiments were performed in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.90 M NaF, at 5°C. The rate constants were obtained by fitting fluorescence-monitored stopped-flow data to either an induced fit mechanism or a conformational selection mechanism using a numerical integration software. The best-fit value of each parameter is shown along with the lower and upper confidence interval bounds. The confidence intervals bounds were computed using a χ2 ratio threshold of 0.9 for both models. NA, not applicable.
Kinetic simulations suggest that the intermediate is helical
The time-resolved SRCD experiments did not allow us to extract amplitude information for λfast and λintermediate by direct fitting. Therefore, we simulated kinetic profiles for possible scenarios for helix formation in induced fit and conformational selection models and compared the simulated and experimental kobs values. In all simulations, we used the rate constants obtained in the fit of the fluorescence data above. We defined three different possible models for helix formation in ACTR upon binding to NCBD (Fig. 7 a): 1) induced fit in which ACTR has no helical content in the intermediate, 2) conformational selection in which NCBD undergoes a conformational rearrangement with no overall changes in helicity before binding to ACTR, and 3) induced fit in which ACTR has all helical content in the intermediate. The fourth possible model of conformational selection in ACTR was ruled out because this model resulted in poor fits to the data. The asterisk annotation of some of the molecular species in the reaction schemes indicates structural rearrangement (Fig. 7 a).
Figure 7.
(a) The simplest scenarios for helix formation were defined for different two-step mechanisms. The first model is an induced fit model in which all helix formation occurs in the conformational rearrangement step after initial binding. The second model represents a conformational selection mechanism in which a conformational rearrangement of NCBD with no overall changes in helicity is followed by a binding step in which all helical content of ACTR is formed. The third model is an induced fit model in which all helical content is formed in the initial binding step. The output amplitude factors, which link the signal output to the concentration of species, were defined as either 0 (no helix) or 1 (helices fully formed) for these simplified models. The structures of ACTR above the species are representations of the helical state of ACTR (disordered with transient helices formed versus stable helices formed) in each step of the different models for binding. (b) Binding reaction profiles were simulated for all models, using the rate constants that were obtained from fitting the fluorescence-monitored stopped-flow data at high ionic strength conditions. Gaussian noise was added to the simulated reaction profiles with an SD of 0.1. The traces were fitted to a single exponential function, and the residual plot is shown below the graph. The figure shows a simulated binding trace for model 3 as an example. The concentrations used to simulate the trace were 2 μM NCBD and 1.7 μM ACTR. (c) The dependence of apparent kobs on [ACTR] for the defined models is shown. The apparent kobs values were obtained from the fits to the simulated reaction profiles for each model. The apparent kobs values obtained in the SRCD stopped-flow experiments are shown in black squares, and the error bars represent the standard error from the fit to a single exponential function. (d and e) The rSRCD data fitted to a conformational selection model and induced fit model, respectively, are shown. The χ2/degrees of freedom (DoF) as well as the residuals of the fit are given for each model. (f) An energy diagram with a schematic model for the best-fit scenario of helix formation in ACTR is shown. The energy diagram was computed using 10 μM ACTR. ACTR binds to NCBD with an induced fit mechanism in which virtually all helical content is formed in the binding step. The subsequent conformational rearrangement step is not associated with any changes in helicity. The first transition state (TS1) was probed previously with Φ-analysis using a set of helix-modulating mutants, which showed that helix 1 in ACTR is around 50% formed in TS1 (37). The models for free NCBD and NCBD in complex with ACTR were created using PDB: 1KBH and 2KKJ, respectively (10, 15). The model for the intermediate represents a plausible scenario based on the results in this study. To see this figure in color, go online.
The relative amplitudes for the CD signal in each model were defined based on the degree of helicity in the intermediate and product states and were either 0 for nonhelical states or 1 for fully formed helices. To imitate the signal/noise level in the rSRCD experiments, (Fig. 7 b) Gaussian noise with an SD of 0.1 was added to the traces. The resulting traces were apparently monophasic, and we could fit apparent kobs values that represent a weighted average of the kobs values of λfast and λintermediate (Fig. 7 c). The simulated data showed that the induced fit model with a nonhelical intermediate was expected to be dominated by λintermediate, and kobs was approximately constant over the entire concentration range. Furthermore, the reaction profiles of this model contained lag phases that were not observed in the experimental data, although they could be hidden in the experimental noise. Based on this, a mechanism in which helix formation in ACTR occurs after accumulation of the initial encounter complex is unlikely. Therefore, the salt-sensitive kinetic phase λintermediate is probably not associated with any large overall changes in helicity. The model suggesting conformational selection in NCBD and in which all helices in ACTR are formed in the association step also agrees poorly with the experimental data. However, we do not completely rule out this model because this analysis was based on poorly defined rate constants from the fit of the fluorescence-monitored data to the conformational selection model (Fig. 6 c). The experimental data agree best with an induced fit model in which all helical content is formed in the initial binding step(s) before accumulation of the intermediate. The subsequent conformational rearrangement step is thus likely not associated with large changes in helicity. To assess the impact of the low signal/noise on the discrimination between the different models for helix formation, we fitted the stopped-flow CD data directly to the conformational selection (Fig. 7 d) and induced fit models (Fig. 7 e) using the rate constants in Fig. 5. Despite the low signal/noise, a clear and systematic deviation in the residuals was visible in the initial part of the binding reaction for the conformational selection model, and this model also resulted in a slightly higher χ2/degrees of freedom as compared to the induced fit model (1.22 and 1.18, respectively). Thus, we conclude that the signal/noise level in the rSRCD data allows for discrimination between these models, although the differences are small. Fitting of the rSRCD data directly to the induced fit model yielded values of the amplitude factors for the intermediate and final complex of 5.26 ± 0.07 and 5.61 ± 0.05, respectively. The ratio between the amplitudes (5.26/5.61 ≈ 0.94) suggests that more than 90% helicity occurs in the association step. An induced fit model with helical intermediate is in excellent agreement with previous kinetic studies (5, 8) that favored induced fit models. Fig. 7 f summarizes our findings with an energy diagram for the best fitting model of induced fit with helical intermediates in which the conformational rearrangement in the final step is not associated with any significant change in helicity.
Discussion
Coupled folding and binding reactions are mechanistically complex because they involve many interdependent structural changes that are challenging to monitor experimentally. A full mechanistic description of coupled folding and binding reactions thus necessarily involves the integration of many different types of information. Here, we conducted the first rSRCD study of coupled folding and binding and show that at least 90% of the helicity arises concomitantly with association. This is similar to the nucleation-condensation mechanism in protein folding in which secondary and tertiary structures form simultaneously (36). A main advantage of rSRCD is that the amplitude factors are structurally informative. The amplitude factors are sensitive to the structure in intermediates that accumulate during the reaction and thus provide complementary information to fluorescence-monitored kinetics.
The rate-limiting step of the interaction between ACTR and NCBD has previously been probed by experiment and simulation (18, 21, 37). The data suggested that the rate-limiting transition state occurs early in the reaction with partial native-like helix formation in, for example, helix 1 of ACTR and helix 3 of NCBD. Single-molecule studies with high time resolution suggest formation of an intermediate on the microsecond timescale (20), most likely corresponding to an electrostatically stabilized intermediate. This intermediate occurs on a much shorter timescale than can be detected by the rSRCD setup and is thus observed as part of the association phase. Our data suggest that once this energy barrier has been traversed, the remaining helices form rapidly and before the intermediate that accumulates at high ionic strength. Because we find that the helical content of the intermediate is native-like, it follows that the subsequent transition involves a rearrangement of folded helices. High ionic strength unmasks this step, so it is reasonable to assume that it involves electrostatic interactions. Electrostatics are important for initial association as shown by the salt dependence of the ACTR/NCBD interaction (38). Previous studies have highlighted a buried ionic interaction as a determinant for packing specificity (13), with the removal of which also having a strong negative effect on kon8. A compact helical complex with improper ion pairing is thus a likely candidate for the kinetic intermediate observed at high ionic strength.
Coupled folding and binding reactions have been investigated thoroughly by molecular simulations (39). The complex between NCBD and ACTR is one of the most popular model systems for such simulations. Some of these simulations have highlighted partially folded intermediates during the reactions. This prompts the question of whether the intermediates seen in simulations correspond to the intermediates giving rise to different kinetic phases. The measurement of helix formation in the different kinetic phases allows us to answer this question. The short answer is no. The intermediates reported in simulation studies all have an intermediate degree of helicity (22, 23). Because almost all helicity is gained in the first kinetic phase, this suggests that any putative intermediates with partially formed helices would be occurring as very short-lived species upon barrier crossing. Simulations of coupled binding and folding reactions necessarily involve compromises in terms of coarse-graining, implicit water, or various methods for enhanced sampling (39). Such systems may not always reproduce the subtle energetic landscape of a coupled folding and binding reaction, and equivalence between intermediates observed in simulations and experiments should not be assumed automatically. Our study provides an experimental benchmark for future simulation studies regarding helix formation at different stages in the reaction.
The rSRCD facility presents a novel tool to interrogate structural changes accompanying biochemical reactions. The system studied here is challenging because of the rapid bimolecular binding kinetics with kobs values around 100 s−1 and amplitudes with low signal/noise. We could only record reliable data within a narrow range of conditions, which suggests that we are at the edge of feasibility for the current setup. However, even with these limitations, the rSRCD setup is a promising, to our knowledge, new tool to follow binding reactions, especially for coupled folding and binding, because such reactions often result in a change in CD signal. A key challenge for the continuing development of the rSRCD beamline is to reduce the instrumental artifact that obscures the first milliseconds. CD measurements are inherently more sensitive to the geometry of the cuvette than, for example, fluorescence; therefore, this problem may be hard to avoid completely but will be addressed in further development of the facility.
Author Contributions
N.C.J. and S.V.H. designed the new beamline. E.K., E.A., and M.K. performed the experiments. E.K., P.J., and M.K. designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the article with input from all coauthors.
Acknowledgments
Lasse Staby and Mikhail Kuravsky are thanked for assistance with the calibration of the mixing time. Access to the beamline was granted by ISA, Centre for Storage Ring Facilities, of Aarhus University.
The rSRCD side branch was funded by the Carlsberg Foundation and the Danish Research Infrastructure Programme, and the AU-AMO beamline was additionally funded by the Lundbeck Foundation and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (Natural Sciences). This work was supported by grants to M.K. from the Young Investigator Program of the Villum Foundation and the Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies COFUND program (agreement no. 609033) and by the Swedish Research Council to P.J. (grant 2016-04965).
Editor: David Eliezer.
Contributor Information
Per Jemth, Email: per.jemth@imbim.uu.se.
Magnus Kjaergaard, Email: magnus@mbg.au.dk.
References
- 1.Ward J.J., Sodhi J.S., Jones D.T. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;337:635–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tantos A., Han K.H., Tompa P. Intrinsic disorder in cell signaling and gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012;348:457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gianni S., Dogan J., Jemth P. Coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins: what can we learn from kinetics? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016;36:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shammas S.L., Crabtree M.D., Clarke J. Insights into coupled folding and binding mechanisms from kinetic studies. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:6689–6695. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.692715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gianni S., Dogan J., Jemth P. Distinguishing induced fit from conformational selection. Biophys. Chem. 2014;189:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chu W.T., Clarke J., Wang J. Role of non-native electrostatic interactions in the coupled folding and binding of PUMA with Mcl-1. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim J.Y., Meng F., Chung H.S. Diffusion-limited association of disordered protein by non-native electrostatic interactions. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4707. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06866-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dogan J., Schmidt T., Jemth P. Fast association and slow transitions in the interaction between two intrinsically disordered protein domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:34316–34324. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.399436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lindström I., Dogan J. Native hydrophobic binding interactions at the transition state for association between the TAZ1 domain of CBP and the disordered TAD-STAT2 are not a requirement. Biochemistry. 2017;56:4145–4153. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Demarest S.J., Martinez-Yamout M., Wright P.E. Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. Nature. 2002;415:549–553. doi: 10.1038/415549a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kjaergaard M., Nørholm A.B., Kragelund B.B. Temperature-dependent structural changes in intrinsically disordered proteins: formation of α-helices or loss of polyproline II? Protein Sci. 2010;19:1555–1564. doi: 10.1002/pro.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ebert M.O., Bae S.H., Wright P.E. NMR relaxation study of the complex formed between CBP and the activation domain of the nuclear hormone receptor coactivator ACTR. Biochemistry. 2008;47:1299–1308. doi: 10.1021/bi701767j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Demarest S.J., Deechongkit S., Wright P.E. Packing, specificity, and mutability at the binding interface between the p160 coactivator and CREB-binding protein. Protein Sci. 2004;13:203–210. doi: 10.1110/ps.03366504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kjaergaard M., Andersen L., Teilum K. A folded excited state of ligand-free nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) underlies plasticity in ligand recognition. Biochemistry. 2013;52:1686–1693. doi: 10.1021/bi4001062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kjaergaard M., Teilum K., Poulsen F.M. Conformational selection in the molten globule state of the nuclear coactivator binding domain of CBP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:12535–12540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001693107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kjaergaard M., Poulsen F.M., Teilum K. Is a malleable protein necessarily highly dynamic? The hydrophobic core of the nuclear coactivator binding domain is well ordered. Biophys. J. 2012;102:1627–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dogan J., Jemth P. Only kinetics can prove conformational selection. Biophys. J. 2014;107:1997–1998. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dogan J., Mu X., Jemth P. The transition state structure for coupled binding and folding of disordered protein domains. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2076. doi: 10.1038/srep02076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zosel F., Mercadante D., Schuler B. A proline switch explains kinetic heterogeneity in a coupled folding and binding reaction. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05725-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sturzenegger F., Zosel F., Schuler B. Transition path times of coupled folding and binding reveal the formation of an encounter complex. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4708. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07043-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Karlsson E., Andersson E., Camilloni C. A structurally heterogeneous transition state underlies coupled binding and folding of disordered proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:1230–1239. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ganguly D., Zhang W., Chen J. Synergistic folding of two intrinsically disordered proteins: searching for conformational selection. Mol. Biosyst. 2012;8:198–209. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05156c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang W., Ganguly D., Chen J. Residual structures, conformational fluctuations, and electrostatic interactions in the synergistic folding of two intrinsically disordered proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012;8:e1002353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Knott M., Best R.B. Discriminating binding mechanisms of an intrinsically disordered protein via a multi-state coarse-grained model. J. Chem. Phys. 2014;140:175102. doi: 10.1063/1.4873710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu X., Chen J., Chen J. Residual structure accelerates binding of intrinsically disordered ACTR by promoting efficient folding upon encounter. J. Mol. Biol. 2019;431:422–432. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shammas S.L., Travis A.J., Clarke J. Allostery within a transcription coactivator is predominantly mediated through dissociation rate constants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12055–12060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405815111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shammas S.L., Travis A.J., Clarke J. Remarkably fast coupled folding and binding of the intrinsically disordered transactivation domain of cMyb to CBP KIX. 2013;117:13346–13356. doi: 10.1021/jp404267e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dahal L., Shammas S.L., Clarke J. Phosphorylation of the IDP KID modulates affinity for KIX by increasing the lifetime of the complex. Biophys. J. 2017;113:2706–2712. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wallace B.A., Janes R.W. Synchrotron radiation circular dichroism (SRCD) spectroscopy: an enhanced method for examining protein conformations and protein interactions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010;38:861–873. doi: 10.1042/BST0380861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gasteiger E., Hoogland C., Bairoch A. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker J.M., editor. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Humana Press; 2005. pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoffmann S.V., Fano M., van de Weert M. Circular dichroism spectroscopy for structural characterization of proteins. In: Müllertz A., Perrie Y., Rades T., editors. Analytical Techniques in the Pharmaceutical Sciences. Springer; 2016. pp. 223–251. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Savitzky A., Golay M.J.E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 1964;36:1627–1639. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Johnson K.A., Simpson Z.B., Blom T. Global kinetic explorer: a new computer program for dynamic simulation and fitting of kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 2009;387:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Johnson K.A., Simpson Z.B., Blom T. FitSpace explorer: an algorithm to evaluate multidimensional parameter space in fitting kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 2009;387:30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Miles A.J., Wallace B.A. Synchrotron radiation circular dichroism spectroscopy of proteins and applications in structural and functional genomics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006;35:39–51. doi: 10.1039/b316168b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Itzhaki L.S., Otzen D.E., Fersht A.R. The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analysed by protein engineering methods: evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 1995;254:260–288. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Iešmantavičius V., Dogan J., Kjaergaard M. Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. Angew. Chem. Int. Engl. 2014;53:1548–1551. doi: 10.1002/anie.201307712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dogan J., Jonasson J., Jemth P. Binding rate constants reveal distinct features of disordered protein domains. Biochemistry. 2015;54:4741–4750. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baker C.M., Best R.B. Insights into the binding of intrinsically disordered proteins from molecular dynamics simulation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014;4:182–198. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Malatesta F. The study of bimolecular reactions under non-pseudo-first order conditions. Biophys. Chem. 2005;116:251–256. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







