ABSTRACT
The segment 4 (S4) voltage sensor in voltage-gated sodium channels (Navs) have domain-specific functions, and the S4 segment in domain DIV (DIVS4) plays a key role in the activation and fast inactivation processes through the coupling of arginine residues in DIVS4 with residues of putative gating charge transfer center (pGCTC) in DIVS1-3. In addition, the first four arginine residues (R1-R4) in Nav DIVS4 have position-specific functions in the fast inactivation process, and mutations in these residues are associated with diverse phenotypes of Nav-related diseases (sodium channelopathies). R1 and R2 mutations commonly display a delayed fast inactivation, causing a gain-of-function, whereas R3 and R4 mutations commonly display a delayed recovery from inactivation and profound use-dependent current attenuation, causing a severe loss-of-function. In contrast, mutations of residues of pGCTC in Nav DIVS1-3 can also alter fast inactivation. Such alterations in fast inactivation may be caused by disrupted interactions of DIVS4 with DIVS1-3. Despite fast inactivation of Navs occurs from both the open-state (open-state inactivation; OSI) and closed state (closed-state inactivation; CSI), changes in CSI have received considerably less attention than those in OSI in the pathophysiology of sodium channelopathies. CSI can be altered by mutations of arginine residues in DIVS4 and residues of pGCTC in Navs, and altered CSI can be an underlying primary biophysical defect of sodium channelopathies. Therefore, CSI should receive focus in order to clarify the pathophysiology of sodium channelopathies.
KEYWORDS: Closed-state inactivation, fast inactivation, sodium channelopathies, voltage-gated sodium channel, voltage sensor
Introduction
The family of voltage-gated sodium channels (Navs), encoded by the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit gene (SCNnA, n = number), consists of nine Navs (Nav1.1-Nav1.9) [1]. Navs are critical determinants for action potential initiation, formation and propagation in excitable cells, including nervous system and skeletal and cardiac muscles [1,2]. The sodium flow through Navs is regulated by voltage-dependent transitions between resting (closed), activated (open) and inactivated-states [2]. Transition to inactivated-states (inactivation) of Navs is divided into fast, intermediate and slow components, according to the time scale of the inactivation rate. Fast inactivation greatly regulates the sodium flow through Navs and can occur from both an open-state (open-state inactivation; OSI) and a closed state (closed-state inactivation; CSI) [2–4].
The Navs are composed of four homologous but non-identical domains (DⅠ-DIV), and each domain contains a segment 4 (S4) voltage sensor that consists of positively charged arginine and lysine repeats. S4 segments in Navs have domain-specific functions, especially in the activation and fast inactivation processes [5,6]. For OSI during strong depolarization, the S4 segments in DⅠ-DIV of Navs move outward quickly and then the S4 segments in DⅢ and DIV become immobilized to promote the opening of the activation gate through a process known as electromechanical coupling, followed by the binding of the inactivation particle (conserved hydrophobic IFM motif in the cytoplasmic region linking DⅢ and DIV) to its binding sites [2,5–9]. The movement of the S4 segment in DIV (DIVS4) is particularly necessary for binding the inactivation particle to its binding sites [2,4]. On the other hand, for CSI during weak/subthreshold depolarization, only the S4 segments in DⅢ and DIV move outward without activation gate opening, but this is sufficient to allow access of the inactivation particle to its binding sites [2,4,8]. Conversely, for recovery from inactivation during repolarization, S4 segments return to their hyperpolarized/resting position, which allows the inactivation particle to unbind from its binding sites [2,4,8], and movement of DIVS4 is thought to be the rate-limiting step during repolarization [10]. Thus, DIVS4 of Navs plays a pivotal role in the activation and inactivation processes.
Mutations in Navs are responsible for multiple disorders (Nav-related diseases: sodium channelopathies) depending on the expression of each of Navs on organs and its functional abnormalities [11]. Functional defects of mutations in Navs can be caused by multiple mechanisms, including defective membrane trafficking, production of non-functional channels, and altered channel gating properties. Among them, altered channel gating properties, especially altered fast inactivation, can cause both a gain- and loss-of-function (and the combination of both), which can be associated with diverse phenotypes. However, although alteration of OSI of Navs has received much attention, that of CSI has received considerably less attention in the pathophysiology of sodium channelopathies.
In this review, we describe the role of the voltage sensor module in Nav DIV on fast inactivation, including CSI, in sodium channelopathies.
Voltage sensor module in Nav DIV
Recent structural studies of Navs, such as prokaryotic NavAb [12], cockroach NavPaS [13], eel Nav1.4 [14] and human Nav1.4 [9], have shown that arginine residues in the S4 are in proximity to residues that may facilitate gating charge transfer (putative gating charge transfer center; pGCTC) in the S1-3 segments (Figure 1), and have established the coupling of the S4 with S1-3 in the activation and inactivation processes [15]. For example, in prokaryotic NavAb, R105 in S4 forms hydrogen bonds with N25 in S1 [12]. On the other hand, focusing on the most important domain, DIV, in the activation and inactivation processes, in Nav1.4, R1457 in DIVS4 (homologous residue to R105 in NavAb) forms hydrogen bonds with N1366 in DIVS1 (homologous residue to N25 in NavAb), one of the residues of pGCTC [9,16]. Since homologous residues among Navs have common functional roles, the arginine residues of each DIVS4 and residues of pGCTC in DIVS1-3 play common pivotal roles in the activation and inactivation processes. Furthermore, it has become apparent that the first four arginine residues (R1-R4) in Navs DIVS4 have position-specific functions in the activation and inactivation processes [9,15,17].
Defective inactivation by mutations of arginine residues in SCN4A/Nav1.4 DIVS4
SCN4A/Nav1.4 is predominantly expressed in skeletal muscles, and mutations in Nav1.4 are associated with multiple skeletal muscle disorders including myotonia, paramyotonia congenita (PC), hyper or hypokalemic periodic paralysis (hyperPP or hypoPP), and congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS). Gain-of-function of Nav1.4 is typically associated with myotonia, PC, hyperPP and hypoPP, and the clinical overlap of PC and hyperPP is extensive. In contrast, loss-of-function of Nav1.4 is typically associated with CMS [11].
Several mutations in Nav1.4 DIVS4 have been identified [11], and some of them have been functionally characterized (Table 1). Functional studies of R1 mutations, including R1448S, R1448H, R1448P and R1448C, associated with PC, commonly exhibited a delayed fast inactivation and hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, with either a delayed or accelerated recovery from inactivation [18–24]. R2 mutations, including R1451C and R1451L, associated with PC (with or without hyperPP or hypoPP), also exhibited a delayed fast inactivation and hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability [25,26]. Contrary to the report of R1451L by Poulin et al. [25], Luo et al. reported that a homozygous R1451L carrier showed hypoPP and myotonia, whereas heterozygous R1451L carriers showed hyperPP and myotonia, and R1451L displayed an accelerated recovery from inactivation [26]. Intriguingly, they also reported that R1451L displayed an enhanced CSI. As described, mutations of R1 and R2 in Nav1.4 commonly exhibited a delayed fast inactivation, resulting in a gain-of-function of Nav1.4 and theoretically causing PC, although these mutations also exhibited a hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability that leads to a loss-of-function of Nav1.4. In contrast, an R3 mutation R1454W and R4 mutation R1457H, associated with CMS, commonly exhibited a hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed recovery from inactivation and profound use-dependent current attenuation [27,28], resulting in a severe loss-of-function of Nav1.4 and theoretically causing CMS, although these mutations also exhibited a delayed fast inactivation that leads to a gain-of-function of Nav1.4.
Table 1.
Gene Protein | Arginine position | Mutation | Defective inactivation | Phenotype | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN4A Nav1.4 | R1 | R1448S | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation |
PC | Bendahhou et al. 1999 [18] |
R1 | R1448H | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, accelerated recovery from inactivation |
PC | Yang et al. 1994 [19] Chahine et al. 1994 [20] Mohammadi et al. 2003 [21] |
|
R1 | R1448P | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, |
PC | Jarecki et al. 2010 [22] | |
R1 | R1448L | N/A | PC | Matthews et al. 2008 [23] | |
R1 | R1448C | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, accelerated recovery from inactivation |
PC | Yang et al. 1994 [19] Chahine et al. 1994 [20] Dice et al. 2004 [24] |
|
R2 | R1451C | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from slow inactivation, |
hypoPP | Poulin et al. 2018 [25] | |
R2 | R1451L | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from slow inactivation, |
PC, hyperPP, hypoPP |
Poulin et al. 2018 [25] | |
R2 | R1451L | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, accelerated recovery from inactivation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
hypoPP and myotonia (homozygous), hyperPP and myotonia (heterozygous) |
Luo et al. 2018 [26] | |
R3 | R1454W | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, delayed entry into slow inactivation, delayed recovery from slow inactivation, profound use-dependent current attenuation |
CMS | Habbout et al. 2016 [27] | |
R4 | R1457H | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, profound use-dependent current attenuation, |
CMS | Arnold et al. 2015 [28] | |
SCN5A Nav1.5 | R1 | R1623Q | Delayed fast inactivation | LQTS | Kambouris et al. 1998 [38] Makita et al. 1998 [39] |
R1 | R1623L | N/A | LQTS | Splawski et al. 2000 [35] | |
R2 | R1626H | N/A | LQTS | Kapplinger et al. 2009 [36] | |
R2 | R1626H | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA |
AF | Olesen et al. 2012 [41] | |
R2 | R1626P | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA |
LQTS | Ruan et al. 2007 [40] | |
R3 | R1629G | N/A | BrS | Amin et al. 2009 [37] | |
R3 | R1629Q | Accelerated fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced intermediate inactivation |
BrS | Zeng et al. 2013 [42] | |
R4 | R1632H | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, |
SSS | Benson et al. 2003 [31] Gui et al. 2010 [43] |
|
R4 | R1632C | Hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, profound use-dependent current attenuation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI, delayed recovery from CSI |
BrS, SSS, SVT |
Nakajima et al. 2015 [34] Dharmawan et al. 2019 [57] |
|
SCN1A Nav1.1 | R1 | R1636Q | N/A | LGS | Harkin et al. 2007 [47] |
R1 | R1636Q | N/A | DS | Heron et al. 2010 [48] | |
R2 | R1639G | N/A | DS | Depienne et al. 2009 [49] | |
R3 | R1642S | N/A | DS | Huang et al. 2017 [11] | |
R3 | R1642M | N/A | DS | Lee et al. 2015 [50] | |
R4 | R1645Q | N/A | DS | Heron et al. 2010 [48] | |
R5 | R1648H | Delayed fast inactivation | GEFS+ | Lossin et al. 2002 [46] | |
R5 | R1648H | Accelerated recovery from inactivation, decreased use-dependent current attenuation |
GEFS+2 | Spampanato et al. 2001 [44] | |
SCN2A Nav1.2 | R1 | R1626Q | N/A | BFIS3 | Soden et al. 2014 [51] |
R2 | R1629L | N/A | OS | Nakamura et al. 2013 [52] | |
SCN8A Nav1.6 | R1 | R1617Q | Delayed fast inactivation, depolarizing shift in SSA |
EIEE13 | Wagnon et al. 2016 [53] |
AF, atrial fibrillation; BFIS3, benign familial infantile seizure 3; BrS, Brugada syndrome; CMS, congenital myasthenic syndrome; CSI, closed-state inactivation; DS, Dravet syndrome; EIEE13, early infantile epileptic encephalopathy type 13; GEFS+, generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus; GEFS+2, generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus type 2; HyperPP, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis; HypoPP, hypokalemic periodic paralysis; LGS, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; LQTS, long QT syndrome; N/A, not available; OS, Ohtahara syndrome; PC, paramyotonia congenita; R1-R5, first five arginine residues (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) in domain IV-segment 4; SSA, steady-state availability; SSS, sick sinus syndrome; SVT, supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Descriptions of closed-state inactivation are written in bold and italic.
Intriguingly, structural studies demonstrated that R1451 (R2) in Nav1.4 DIVS4 coupled with E1373 (Figure 1), one of the residues of pGCTC, in DIVS1, and that R1451L disrupted its electrostatic interaction with E1373 [9,14,26]. Luo et al. hypothesized that the R1451L mutation may destabilize the S4 movement that should be immobilized and allow for a quicker recovery of the S4 to the hyperpolarized/resting state, which may lead to an accelerated recovery from inactivation [26]. This concept may be supported by the fact that neutralizing or charged-reversing mutations of E1373 also accelerate the recovery from inactivation [15]. Regarding CSI, the R1451L enhanced and accelerated entry into CSI. However, recovery from CSI has not been evaluated [26].
Defective inactivation by mutations of arginine residues in SCN5A/Nav1.5 DIVS4
SCN5A/Nav1.5 is predominantly expressed in cardiac muscles and the His-Purkinje conduction system. Gain-of-function of Nav1.5 is typically associated with type-3 long QT syndrome (LQT3) [29]. In contrast, loss-of-function of Nav1.5 can be associated with Brugada syndrome (BrS) [30], sick sinus syndrome (SSS) [31], atrioventricular conduction block [32] and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) [33,34], and these arrhythmic phenotypes can overlap with a single SCN5A mutation.
Several mutations in Nav1.5 DIVS4 have been identified [11,35–37], and some of them have been functionally characterized (Table 1). Mutations of R1 and R2, R1623Q (R1) and R1626P (R2), commonly exhibited a delayed fast inactivation, which leads to a gain-of-function of Nav1.5 and can be associated with LQT3 [38–41]. In contrast, mutations of R3 and R4, such as R1629Q (R3), R1632H (R4) and R1632C (R4), commonly exhibited a marked hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed recovery from inactivation and profound use-dependent current attenuation, resulting in a severe loss-of-function of Nav1.5 [31,34,42,43]. These functional abnormalities can theoretically be associated with BrS with or without SSS and SVTs.
A comparison of the structural alignment of Nav1.5 DIVS4 with Nav1.4 DIVS4 revealed arginine residue-specific functional abnormalities. Of note, mutations of R1 and R2 in Nav1.5 or Nav1.4 displayed a common biophysical defect of a delayed fast inactivation, resulting in a gain-of-function of either Nav1.5 or Nav1.4. In contrast, mutation of R3 and R4 in Nav1.5 or Nav1.4 displayed common biophysical defects of a hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed recovery from inactivation and profound use-dependent current attenuation, resulting in a severe loss-of-function of either Nav1.5 or Nav1.4.
Mutations of arginine residues in other Nav DIVS4
SCN1A/Nav1.1 is predominantly expressed in neuronal cell bodies and axon initial segments in the central nervous system (CNS) [11,44]. Several mutations in Nav1.1 DIVS4 have been identified [11,45,46], including R1636Q (R1) [47,48], found in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome (DS), R1639G (R2) [49], found in DS, R1642S (R3) [11], found in DS, R1642M (R3) [50], found in DS, and R1645Q (R4) [48], found in DS (Table 1). However, none of them have been functionally examined.
SCN2A/Nav1.2 is predominantly expressed in axons and dendrites in the CNS [11,44]. R1626Q (R1) in Nav1.2 [51], found in benign familial infantile seizure, and R1629L (R2) in Nav1.2 [52], found in Ohtahara syndrome, have been identified (Table 1). However, neither of them has been functionally examined. On the other hand, SCN8A/Nav1.6 is predominantly expressed in the neuronal cell bodies and proximal processes in the CNS and nodes of Ranvier in the peripheral nervous system [11,44]. R1617Q (R1) in Nav1.6 [53], found in early infantile epileptic encephalopathy type 13, displayed a delayed fast inactivation and depolarizing shift in steady-state availability, causing a gain-of-function of Nav1.6 (Table 1). Notably, the delayed fast inactivation of R1617Q (R1) in Nav1.6 is consistent with R1 mutations in Nav1.4 and Nav1.5 which also show a delayed fast inactivation. This fact further supports the notion that arginine residues in Navs DIVS4 have position-specific functions in each of Navs.
Defective inactivation by mutations of pGCTC in Nav1.4 DIVS1-3
In Nav1.4, D1356, N1366, E1373, N1389, F1396, E1399 and D1420 in DIVS1-S3 are thought to be residues of pGCTC (Figure 1) and couple with arginine residues in DIVS4 in the activation and inactivation processes [9,15]. Among them, several substituted residues have been structurally and functionally examined (Table 2).
Table 2.
Gene Protein | Location | Mutation | Defective inactivation | Phenotype | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN4A Nav1.4 | DIVS1 | N1366D | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation |
N/A | Groome et al. 2013 [15] |
DIVS1 | N1366S | Delayed fast inactivation, depolarizing shift in SSA, accelerated recovery from inactivation |
PC | Ke et al. 2017 [54] | |
DIVS3 | N1420K | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, accelerated/delayed recovery from inactivation |
N/A | Groome et al. 2013 [15] | |
SCN5A Nav1.5 | DIVS1 | N1541D | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
BrS, SSS, SVT |
Dharmawan et al. 2019 [57] |
DIVS1 | E1548K | N/A | BrS | Kapplinger et al. 2010 [55] | |
DIVS2 | F1571C | N/A | BrS | Kapplinger et al. 2010 [55] | |
DIVS2 | E1574K | N/A | BrS | Kapplinger et al. 2010 [55] | |
DIVS3 | D1595N | Delayed fast inactivation, depolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced slow inactivation |
AVB | Wang et al. 2002 [56] | |
SCN1A Nav1.1 | DIVS1 | D1544A | N/A | DS | Huang et al. 2017 [11] |
DIVS1 | D1544G | N/A | DS | Huang et al. 2017 [11] | |
DIVS1 | E1561K | N/A | DS | Walsh et al. 2014 [58] | |
DIVS3 | D1608G | N/A | DS | Huang et al. 2017 [11] | |
DIVS3 | D1608Y | N/A | DS | Marini et al. 2007 [59] |
AVB, atrioventricular conduction block; BrS, Brugada syndrome; CSI, closed-state inactivation; DS, Dravet syndrome; N/A, not available; PC, paramyotonia congenita; SSS, sick sinus syndrome; SSA, steady-state availability; SVT, supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. N1366D and N1420K in Nav1.4 are listed because they are homologous residue to N1541D and D1595N in Nav1.5, respectively. Descriptions of closed-state inactivation are written in bold and italic.
The functional effects of substitutions of these residues in Nav1.4 may vary depending on not only the position but also the charge of the substituted residues. Of note, structural studies showed that N1366 in DIVS1 forms hydrogen bonds with R1457 (R4) in DIVS4, and a functional study of N1366D (replaced with a negatively charged residue) displayed a hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, altered voltage-dependence of fast inactivation and delayed recovery from inactivation, causing a loss-of-function of Nav1.4 [9,15] (Table 2). Conversely, N1366S (replaced with an uncharged residue), found in PC, displayed a cold-induced hyperpolarizing shift in activation, depolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed fast inactivation and accelerated recovery from inactivation, causing a gain-of-function of Nav1.4 that can be associated with PC [54] (Table 2). Intriguingly, a structural study of N1366S demonstrated disrupted interactions of N1366S and an arginine residue in DIVS4 at low temperature [54]. On the other hand, a structural study showed that D1420, one of the residues of pGCTC, in Nav1.4 DIVS3 is in close proximity to R1635 (R5) in DIVS4, and a functional study showed that D1420K (replaced with a positively charged residue) displayed a delayed fast inactivation and altered voltage-dependence of recovery from inactivation (Table 2) [15]. These findings reconfirm the importance of the coupling of arginine residues in DIVS4 with pGCTC in DIVS1-3 in the activation and inactivation processes. Regarding CSI, none of them have been examined.
Defective inactivation by mutations of pGCTC in Nav1.5 DIVS1-3
In Nav1.5, D1531, N1541, E1548, N1564, F1571, E1574 and D1595 in DIVS1-S3 are thought to be residues of pGCTC (Figure 1) [9,15]. Among several disease-related mutations of these residues, D1595N (D1595 is the homologous residue to D1420 in Nav1.4) in DIVS3, found in atrioventricular conduction block, and N1541D (N1541 is the homologous residue to N1366 in Nav1.4) in DIVS1, found in BrS with SSS and SVTs, have been functionally examined (Table 2) [55–57].
D1595N (replaced with an uncharged residue) displayed a delayed fast inactivation, depolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed recovery from inactivation and enhanced slow inactivation (Table 2) [56]. In contrast, N1541D (replaced with a negatively charged residue) displayed a hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed fast inactivation and delayed recovery from inactivation (Table 2) [57]. It is noteworthy that these kinetic changes resemble those of N1366D in Nav1.4 [15]. Furthermore, N1541D displayed an enhanced CSI and accelerated entry into CSI without alteration of recovery from CSI (Tables 2 and 3) [57].
Table 3.
Gene Protein | Location | Mutation | Defective inactivation | Phenotype | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN4A Nav1.4 |
DⅢS4 (R3) | R1135C* (rat R1128C) |
Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced CSI, delayed recovery from CSI |
hypoPP | Groome et al. 2014 [60] Groome et al. 2014 [61] |
DⅢS4 (R3) | R1135H* (rat R1128H) |
Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced CSI, delayed recovery from CSI |
hypoPP | Groome et al. 2014 [60] | |
DIVS4 (R2) | R1451L | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, accelerated recovery from inactivation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
hypoPP and myotonia (homozygous) hyperPP and myotonia (heterozygous) |
Luo et al. 2018 [26] | |
SCN5A Nav1.5 |
DⅡ-DⅢ linker | E1053K | Accelerated fast inactivation, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced intermediate inactivation, enhanced CSI |
BrS | Mohler et al. 2004 [66] |
DⅢ-DIV linker | Delta KPQ | Delayed fast inactivation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
LQTS | Viswanathan et al. 2001 [63] Chen et al. 2002 [64] |
|
DIVS1 | N1541D | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
BrS, SSS, SVT |
Dharmawan et al. 2019 [57] | |
DIVS4 (R4) | R1632C | Hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, delayed recovery from inactivation, profound use-dependent current attenuation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI, delayed recovery from CSI |
BrS, SSS, SVT |
Nakajima et al. 2005 [34] Dharmawan et al. 2019 [57] |
|
C-terminus | 1795insD | Delayed fast inactivation, delayed recovery from inactivation, profound use-dependent current attenuation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA, enhanced slow inactivation, enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
LQTS, BrS |
Veldkamp et al. 2000 [67] Viswanathan et al. 2001 [63] |
|
C-terminus | L1825P | Delayed fast inactivation, hyperpolarizing shift in SSA enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI |
LQTS | Makita et al. 2002 [65] |
BrS, Brugada syndrome; CSI, closed-state inactivation; HyperPP, hyperkalemic periodic paralysis; HypoPP, hypokalemic periodic paralysis; LQTS, long QT syndrome; R2-4, second to fourth arginine residues (R2, R3, and R4) in domain IV-segment 4; SSA, steady-state availability; SSS, sick sinus syndrome; SVT, supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. *, Electrophysiological data were obtained from rat Nav1.4 R1128C or rat Nav1.4 R1128H. Descriptions of closed-state inactivation are written in bold and italic.
Mutations of pGCTC in other Nav DIVS1-3
In Nav1.1, D1544, N1554, E1561, N1577, F1584, E1587 and D1608 are thought to be residues of pGCTC (Figure 1) [9,15]. Although several disease-related mutations, such as D1544A, D1544G, E1561K, D1608G and D1608Y, of residues of pGCTC in Nav1.1 have been identified, none have been functionally examined (Table 2) [11,58,59]. No disease-related mutations of residues of pGCTC in other Navs have been reported.
Coupling of S4 with S1-3 in Nav DIV may be implicated in the CSI process
Enhanced CSI by mutations of each Nav promotes the significant loss of channel availability, which can underlie the pathophysiology of sodium channelopathies. However, in functional analyses of disease-related mutations in Navs, although alteration of OSI has been analyzed in detail, that of CSI has received less attention.
The CSI of disease-related mutations in Nav1.4 has been the most studied among Navs. Functional analyses of R1128C (R3) and R1128H (R3) mutations in rat Nav1.4 DⅢS4, equivalent to R1135C (R3) and R1135H (R3) mutations in human Nav1.4 DⅢS4 found in hypoPP, respectively, displayed an enhanced CSI, accelerated entry into CSI and delayed recovery from CSI (Table 3). It has been shown that, during fast inactivation of Nav1.4, DⅢS4 and DIVS4 move outward, with immobilization of the DⅢS4 coupled to the binding of inactivation particle to its receptor, and return to its hyperpolarizing/resting position during repolarization [5,10]. Taken together with the results of structure-function studies, these CSI alterations of R1128C (R3) and R1128H (R3) mutations in rat Nav1.4 DⅢS4 may be caused by an impaired DⅢS4 movement through disrupted native electrostatic interactions of DⅢS4 and pGCTC in DⅢS2 [60,61]. In contrast, R1451L (R2) in Nav1.4 DIVS4 displayed an enhanced and accelerated entry into CSI (Table 3), possibly by an impaired DIVS4 movement through disrupted interactions of R1451L and a residue (E1373) of pGCTC in DIVS1 [26], consistent with the notion that neutralization of arginines in Nav1.4 DIVS4 enhances CSI [62], although recovery from CSI of R1451L has not been examined. These findings suggested the involvement of coupling of DⅢS4 or DIVS4 with each pGCTC in CSI in native Nav1.4, and may support the notion that, during subthreshold depolarization, outward movement across the membrane and subsequent immobilization of DⅢS4 and DIVS4 of native Nav1.4 drives entry into CSI, and its remobilization drives recovery from CSI during repolarization [2].
Regarding Nav1.5, enhanced CSI and accelerated entry into CSI of several mutations, such as ΔKPQ in DⅢ-DIV linker, L1825P in C-terminus, E1053K in DⅡ-DⅢ linker and 1795insD in C-terminus, have been reported [63–67]. However, recovery from CSI has never been examined. We recently examined the CSI of N1541D (homologous residue to N1366 in Nav1.4), one of the residues of pGCTC, in DIVS1 and R1632C (R4) (homologous residue to R1457 in Nav1.4) in DIVS4 in Nav1.5, both of which were found in BrS with SSS and SVTs [34,57]. Both N1541D and R1632C displayed an enhanced CSI; however, the mechanisms underlying CSI were not uniform. N1541D displayed a marked acceleration of the entry into CSI without alteration of recovery from CSI, whereas R1632C displayed a slight acceleration of the entry into CSI and marked delay of recovery from CSI. These findings shed light on the mechanisms underlying CSI and the structure-function relationships of Nav1.5. The marked acceleration of the entry into CSI of N1541D may be caused by a voltage-dependent modification of coupling of N1541D in DIVS1 with R1632 in DIVS4 during subthreshold depolarization; N1541D markedly affects the coupling in the CSI process. In contrast, the marked delay of the recovery from CSI of R1632C may be caused by a slowed remobilization of DIVS4 to the hyperpolarized/resting position during repolarization through disrupted native electrostatic interactions of DIVS4 and DIVS1, as with the R1128C (R3) and R1128H (R3) mutations in rat Nav1.4 DⅢS4.
Given the resemblance of functional abnormalities among homologous residues in Navs, neutralizing or charge-reversing mutations of arginine residues (R1-R4) in DIVS4 or residues of pGCTC in DIVS1-3 (such as mutations of R1457 and N1366 in Nav1.4, homologous residues to R1632 and N1541 in Nav1.5, respectively, and mutations of R1626 in Nav1.5, a homologous residue to R1451 in Nav1.4) may modify the native electrostatic interactions of DIVS4 and DIVS1-3 in the activation and inactivation processes, including CSI. Further structure-function studies will be required to prove this hypothesis. Furthermore, in addition to the importance of coupling of DIVS4 with DIVS1-3 in the CSI process, other mechanisms involved in CSI may be present and need to be elucidated. Clinically, enhanced CSI of R1632C and N1541D in Nav1.5 is the primary biophysical defect causing a severe loss-of-function of Nav1.5 and may underlie the pathophysiology of overlapping arrhythmic phenotypes [57]. In this manner, enhanced CSI of other mutations in other Navs may also be an underlying factor as a primary biophysical defect in sodium channelopathies.
Lack of gating pore currents by mutations of arginine residues in Nav DIVS4
Although the arginine residues of the S4 segments in DⅢ and DIV appear to have domain-specific important roles in the fast inactivation, those in DⅠ and DⅡ do not appear to have important roles [5,6]. In addition, the role of the S4 segments in Navs differs with respect to gating pore currents (or ω-currents) [68–70].
Gating pore currents were originally observed in the Shaker channel by Starace and Bezanilla [71]. Substitutions of the R1 residue of S4 in the Shaker channel conduct protons or non-selective cations directly through the voltage sensor domains (gating pore or ω-pore), not through alpha (ɑ)-pore, depending on substituted residues. It is thought that disrupted interaction of substituted arginine with pGCTC may create a water crevice spanning the membrane and open a continuous aqueous pathway [68–72]. On the other hand, in Navs, gating pore currents were first observed in substitutions of R1 and R2 in Nav1.2 DⅡS4 [73]. Later, observations of gating pore currents spread to other Navs. It is noteworthy that the gating pore currents in Navs have small amplitudes (less than 1% of the ɑ-pore conductance) and are smaller than those in the voltage-gated potassium channels (Kvs) because of the formation of ɑ-pores: Kvs have four identical gating pores but Navs have only a single gating pore in each ɑ-pore. Moreover, substitutions of the arginine residues of S4 in DIV are more resistant to the creation of gating pore currents than those in DⅠ-DⅢ, possibly because the pGCTC in DIV is spread over a larger distance [70,74,75].
Evidence is accumulating on the pathophysiological roles of gating pore currents in sodium channelopathies, although there is no apparent evidence of their pathophysiological roles in potassium channelopathies. Curiously, in Nav1.4, all hypoPP mutations that have been identified are missense substitutions at arginine (R1 or R2) residues of S4. More surprisingly, all mutations in DⅠ-DⅢ that have been examined, except for those in DIV, create gating pore currents that flow either protons or non-selective cations, depending on the arginine positions and substituted residues [26,70,74,75]. For example, R669H (R1) and R672H (R2) in DⅡS4 create gating pore currents that conduct protons. In contrast, R672G/S/C (R2) in DⅡS4 create gating pore currents that conduct non-selective cations. In either case, these gating pore currents may account for the paradoxical depolarization of skeletal muscles and loss of excitability in low serum potassium, resulting in paralysis, in spite of the loss-of-function of Nav1.4 [26,70,74,75]. Intriguingly, R1135C (R3) in Nav1.4 DⅢS4, which is associated with hypoPP, showed enhanced CSI over a voltage range for which this mutation increases gating pore currents. This suggests that an increase of gating pore currents at subthreshold voltages may be one of the causes for the enhancement of CSI [61].
On the other hand, in Nav1.5, gating pore currents are thought to be associated with a particular clinical phenotype: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with cardiac arrhythmias [69,70]. Most mutations in Nav1.5 associated with this phenotype are located at S4 in DⅠ and DⅡ, but are not present in DIV. R219H (R1) mutation of S4 in DⅠ, which does not promote apparent alteration in Nav1.5, creates gating pore currents that conduct protons [68,70,76]. In contrast, R222Q (R2), R225P (R3) and R225W (R3) mutations in DⅠ and R814W (R3) mutation in DⅡ, which promote either gain- or loss-of-function of Nav1.5, create gating pore currents that conduct non-selective cations [69,70,77–79]. Notably, it appears that mutations of arginine residues in DIVS4 do not create gating pore currents and are not associated with DCM (Table 1). The mechanisms through which the gating pore currents of Nav1.4 and Nav1.5 contribute to the clinical phenotypes need to be clarified.
Conclusions
S4 segments in Navs have domain-specific functions in terms of fast inactivation and gating pore currents. Regarding the fast inactivation, R1-R4 mutations in Nav DIVS4 have position-specific functions. R1 and R2 mutations in Nav DIVS4 commonly display a delayed fast inactivation, which causes a gain-of-function of Nav. R3 and R4 mutations in Nav DIVS4 commonly display a marked hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state availability, delayed recovery from inactivation, and profound use-dependent current attenuation, which cause a severe loss-of-function of Nav. Thus, R1-R4 mutations in Nav DIVS4 exhibit position-specific diverse phenotypes in sodium channelopathies. Regarding the gating pore currents, mutations of arginine residues of S4 in Nav DⅠ-DⅢ, but not DIV, create those, which may underlie the pathophysiology of diverse clinical phenotypes. On the other hand, mutations of residues of pGCTC in Nav DIVS1-3 can also alter fast inactivation. These changes in fast inactivation of Navs may be caused by disrupted interactions of DIVS4 and DIVS1-3. In addition, mutations of arginine residues in Nav DIVS4 and residues of pGCTC in Nav DIVS1-3 can alter not only OSI but also CSI through disrupted interactions of DIVS4 and DIVS1-3. Since altered CSI can be an underlying factor as a primary biophysical defect in sodium channelopathies, CSI should receive a greater degree of focus going forward in order to clarify the pathophysiology of sodium channelopathies.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K09487 to T.N.).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
- [1].Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG.. International union of pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57:397–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Groome J, Lehmann-Horn F, Holzherr B. Open- and closed-state fast inactivation in sodium channels: differential effects of a site-3 anemone toxin. Channels (Austin). 2011;5:65–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Gillespie JI, Meves H. The time course of sodium inactivation in squid giant axons. J Physiol. 1980;299:289–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Armstrong CM. Na channel inactivation from open and closed states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17991–17996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cha A, Ruben PC, George AL Jr., et al. Voltage sensors in domains III and IV, but not I and II, are immobilized by Na+ channel fast inactivation. Neuron. 1999;22:73–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Sheets MF, Kyle JW, Kallen RG, et al. The Na channel voltage sensor associated with inactivation is localized to the external charged residues of domain IV, S4. Biophys J. 1999;77:747–757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Goldin AL. Mechanisms of sodium channel inactivation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:284–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Bahring R, Covarrubias M. Mechanisms of closed-state inactivation in voltage-gated ion channels. J Physiol. 2011;589:461–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Pan X, Li Z, Zhou Q, et al. Structure of the human voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.4 in complex with beta1. Science. 2018;362:eaau2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Sheets MF, Kyle JW, Hanck DA. The role of the putative inactivation lid in sodium channel gating current immobilization. J Gen Physiol. 2000;115:609–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Huang W, Liu M, Yan SF, et al. Structure-based assessment of disease-related mutations in human voltage-gated sodium channels. Protein Cell. 2017;8:401–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Payandeh J, Scheuer T, Zheng N, et al. The crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel. Nature. 2011;475:353–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Shen H, Zhou Q, Pan X, et al. Structure of a eukaryotic voltage-gated sodium channel at near-atomic resolution. Science. 2017;355:eaal4326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Yan Z, Zhou Q, Wang L, et al. Structure of the Nav1.4-beta1 complex from electric eel. Cell. 2017;170:470–482 e411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Groome JR, Winston V. S1-S3 counter charges in the voltage sensor module of a mammalian sodium channel regulate fast inactivation. J Gen Physiol. 2013;141:601–618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Tao X, Lee A, Limapichat W, et al. A gating charge transfer center in voltage sensors. Science. 2010;328:67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Yang N, George AL Jr., Horn R. Molecular basis of charge movement in voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 1996;16:113–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Bendahhou S, Cummins TR, Kwiecinski H, et al. Characterization of a new sodium channel mutation at arginine 1448 associated with moderate Paramyotonia congenita in humans. J Physiol. 1999;518(Pt 2):337–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Yang N, Ji S, Zhou M, et al. Sodium channel mutations in paramyotonia congenita exhibit similar biophysical phenotypes in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12785–12789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Chahine M, George AL Jr., Zhou M, et al. Sodium channel mutations in paramyotonia congenita uncouple inactivation from activation. Neuron. 1994;12:281–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Mohammadi B, Mitrovic N, Lehmann-Horn F, et al. Mechanisms of cold sensitivity of paramyotonia congenita mutation R1448H and overlap syndrome mutation M1360V. J Physiol. 2003;547:691–698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Jarecki BW, Piekarz AD, Jackson JO 2nd, et al. Human voltage-gated sodium channel mutations that cause inherited neuronal and muscle channelopathies increase resurgent sodium currents. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:369–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Matthews E, Tan SV, Fialho D, et al. What causes paramyotonia in the United Kingdom? Common and new SCN4A mutations revealed. Neurology. 2008;70:50–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Dice MS, Abbruzzese JL, Wheeler JT, et al. Temperature-sensitive defects in paramyotonia congenita mutants R1448C and T1313M. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30:277–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Poulin H, Gosselin-Badaroudine P, Vicart S, et al. Substitutions of the S4DIV R2 residue (R1451) in NaV1.4 lead to complex forms of paramyotonia congenita and periodic paralyses. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Luo S, Sampedro Castaneda M, Matthews E, et al. Hypokalaemic periodic paralysis and myotonia in a patient with homozygous mutation p.R1451L in NaV1.4. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Habbout K, Poulin H, Rivier F, et al. A recessive Nav1.4 mutation underlies congenital myasthenic syndrome with periodic paralysis. Neurology. 2016;86:161–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Arnold WD, Feldman DH, Ramirez S, et al. Defective fast inactivation recovery of Nav 1.4 in congenital myasthenic syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:840–850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Bennett PB, Yazawa K, Makita N, et al. Molecular mechanism for an inherited cardiac arrhythmia. Nature. 1995;376:683–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Chen Q, Kirsch GE, Zhang D, et al. Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature. 1998;392:293–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Benson DW, Wang DW, Dyment M, et al. Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A). J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1019–1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Tan HL, Bink-Boelkens MT, Bezzina CR, et al. A sodium-channel mutation causes isolated cardiac conduction disease. Nature. 2001;409:1043–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Ellinor PT, Nam EG, Shea MA, et al. Cardiac sodium channel mutation in atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:99–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Nakajima T, Kaneko Y, Saito A, et al. Enhanced fast-inactivated state stability of cardiac sodium channels by a novel voltage sensor SCN5A mutation, R1632C, as a cause of atypical Brugada syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2296–2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Splawski I, Shen J, Timothy KW, et al. Spectrum of mutations in long-QT syndrome genes. KVLQT1, HERG, SCN5A, KCNE1, and KCNE2. Circulation. 2000;102:1178–1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Salisbury BA, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of mutations from the first 2,500 consecutive unrelated patients referred for the FAMILION long QT syndrome genetic test. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1297–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Amin AS, de Groot EA, Ruijter JM, et al. Exercise-induced ECG changes in Brugada syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:531–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Kambouris NG, Nuss HB, Johns DC, et al. Phenotypic characterization of a novel long-QT syndrome mutation (R1623Q) in the cardiac sodium channel. Circulation. 1998;97:640–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Makita N, Shirai N, Nagashima M, et al. A de novo missense mutation of human cardiac Na+ channel exhibiting novel molecular mechanisms of long QT syndrome. FEBS Lett. 1998;423:5–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Ruan Y, Liu N, Bloise R, et al. Gating properties of SCN5A mutations and the response to mexiletine in long-QT syndrome type 3 patients. Circulation. 2007;116:1137–1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Olesen MS, Yuan L, Liang B, et al. High prevalence of long QT syndrome-associated SCN5A variants in patients with early-onset lone atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012;5:450–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Zeng Z, Zhou J, Hou Y, et al. Electrophysiological characteristics of a SCN5A voltage sensors mutation R1629Q associated with Brugada syndrome. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Gui J, Wang T, Jones RP, et al. Multiple loss-of-function mechanisms contribute to SCN5A-related familial sick sinus syndrome. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Wang J, Ou S-W, Wang Y-J. Distribution and function of voltage-gated sodium channels in the nervous system. Channels (Austin). 2017;11:534–554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Spampanato J, Escayg A, Meisler MH, et al. Functional effects of two voltage-gated sodium channel mutations that cause generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus type 2. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7481–7490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Lossin C, Wang DW, Rhodes TH, et al. Molecular basis of an inherited epilepsy. Neuron. 2002;34:877–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Harkin LA, McMahon JM, Iona X, et al. The spectrum of SCN1A-related infantile epileptic encephalopathies. Brain. 2007;130:843–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Heron SE, Scheffer IE, Iona X, et al. De novo SCN1A mutations in Dravet syndrome and related epileptic encephalopathies are largely of paternal origin. J Med Genet. 2010;47:137–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Depienne C, Trouillard O, Saint-Martin C, et al. Spectrum of SCN1A gene mutations associated with Dravet syndrome: analysis of 333 patients. J Med Genet. 2009;46:183–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Lee HF, Chi CS, Tsai CR, et al. Electroencephalographic features of patients with SCN1A-positive Dravet syndrome. Brain Dev. 2015;37:599–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Soden SE, Saunders CJ, Willig LK, et al. Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:265ra168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Nakamura K, Kato M, Osaka H, et al. Clinical spectrum of SCN2A mutations expanding to Ohtahara syndrome. Neurology. 2013;81:992–998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Wagnon JL, Barker BS, Hounshell JA, et al. Pathogenic mechanism of recurrent mutations of SCN8A in epileptic encephalopathy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3:114–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Ke Q, Ye J, Tang S, et al. N1366S mutation of human skeletal muscle sodium channel causes paramyotonia congenita. J Physiol. 2017;595:6837–6850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Alders M, et al. An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:33–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Wang DW, Viswanathan PC, Balser JR, et al. Clinical, genetic, and biophysical characterization of SCN5A mutations associated with atrioventricular conduction block. Circulation. 2002;105:341–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Dharmawan T, Nakajima T, Iizuka T, et al. Enhanced closed-state inactivation of mutant cardiac sodium channels (SCN5A N1541D and R1632C) through different mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;130:88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Walsh R, Peters NS, Cook SA, et al. Paralogue annotation identifies novel pathogenic variants in patients with Brugada syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Med Genet. 2014;51:35–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Marini C, Mei D, Temudo T, et al. Idiopathic epilepsies with seizures precipitated by fever and SCN1A abnormalities. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1678–1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Groome JR, Lehmann-Horn F, Fan C, et al. NaV1.4 mutations cause hypokalaemic periodic paralysis by disrupting IIIS4 movement during recovery. Brain. 2014;137::998–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Groome JR, Jurkat-Rott K, Lehmann-Horn F. Domain III S4 in closed-state fast inactivation: insights from a periodic paralysis mutation. Channels (Austin). 2014;8:467–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Paldi T. Enhancement of closed-state inactivation by neutralization of S4 arginines in domain IV of a sodium channel. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Viswanathan PC, Bezzina CR, George AL Jr., et al. Gating-dependent mechanisms for flecainide action in SCN5A-linked arrhythmia syndromes. Circulation. 2001;104:1200–1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Chen T, Sheets MF. Enhancement of closed-state inactivation in long QT syndrome sodium channel mutation ΔKPQ. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;283:H966–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Makita N, Horie M, Nakamura T, et al. Drug-induced long-QT syndrome associated with a subclinical SCN5A mutation. Circulation. 2002;106:1269–1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Mohler PJ, Rivolta I, Napolitano C, et al. Nav1.5 E1053K mutation causing Brugada syndrome blocks binding to ankyrin-G and expression of Nav1.5 on the surface of cardiomyocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:17533–17538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Veldkamp MW, Viswanathan PC, Bezzina C, et al. Two distinct congenital arrhythmias evoked by a multidysfunctional Na(+) channel. Circ Res. 2000;86:E91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Moreau A, Gosselin-Badaroudine P, Chahine M. Gating pore currents, a new pathological mechanism underlying cardiac arrhythmias associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. Channels (Austin). 2015;9:139–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Moreau A, Chahine M. A new cardiac channelopathy: from clinical phenotypes to molecular mechanisms associated with Nav1. 5 Gating Pores Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Groome JR, Moreau A, Delemotte L. Gating pore currents in sodium channels. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2018;246:371–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Starace DM, Bezanilla F. A proton pore in a potassium channel voltage sensor reveals a focused electric field. Nature. 2004;427:548–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Tombola F, Pathak MM, Isacoff EY. Voltage-sensing arginines in a potassium channel permeate and occlude cation-selective pores. Neuron. 2005;45:379–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Sokolov S, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Ion permeation through a voltage- sensitive gating pore in brain sodium channels having voltage sensor mutations. Neuron. 2005;47:183–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Gosselin-Badaroudine P, Delemotte L, Moreau A, et al. Gating pore currents and the resting state of Nav1.4 voltage sensor domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:19250–19255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Cannon SC. Sodium Channelopathies of Skeletal Muscle. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2018;246:309–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Gosselin-Badaroudine P, Keller DI, Huang H, et al. A proton leak current through the cardiac sodium channel is linked to mixed arrhythmia and the dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Mann SA, Castro ML, Ohanian M, et al. R222Q SCN5A mutation is associated with reversible ventricular ectopy and dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1566–1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Nair K, Pekhletski R, Harris L, et al. Escape capture bigeminy: phenotypic marker of cardiac sodium channel voltage sensor mutation R222Q. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1681–1688 e1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Nguyen TP, Wang DW, Rhodes TH, et al. Divergent biophysical defects caused by mutant sodium channels in dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia. Circ Res. 2008;102:364–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]