Abstract
A catalytic, enantio- and diastereoselective formation of sulfenyl acetals bearing multiple stereogenic centers is reported. Alkenyl aldehydes undergo a chiral thiiranium-ion initiated cascade starting with intramolecular capture by a formyl group and termination by capture with HFIP solvent. This method provides a one-pot synthesis of dihydropyran and 1,3-disubstituted isochroman acetals in good to excellent yield and with high levels of diastereo- (up to >99:1 dr) and enantiocontrol (up to 99:1 er).
Keywords: 1,3-disubstituted isochromans; Lewis base catalysis; sulfenoacetalization; thiiranium ion; carbonyl nucleophile
Graphical Abstract

A diastereo- and enantioselective Lewis base-catalyzed sulfenoacetalization of alkenyl aldehydes is reported. A chiral thiiranium-ion initiated cascade starts with intramolecular capture by a formyl group followed by capture with HFIP solvent. Resulting dihydropyran and 1,3-disubstituted isochroman acetals are formed in good to excellent yield and with high levels of diastereo- (up to >99:1 dr) and enantiocontrol (up to 99:1 er).
Chiral, stereochemically defined isochroman motifs are present in many natural products and bioactive molecules (Figure 1).[1] Historically, chiral isochromans have been prepared by diastereoselective oxa-Pictet-Spengler cyclization of enantioenriched starting materials.[2] Pioneering, enantioselective syntheses of 1-substituted isochroman derivatives were reported by Jacobsen[3], Watson[4] and Meng.[5] In addition, Fu[6] and Ghorai[7] reported syntheses of enantioenriched, 1- or 3-substituted isochromans. Although substantial effort has been devoted to access monosubstituted isochroman derivatives in both racemic and enantiomerically enriched fashion, methods to prepare 1,3-disubstituted analogs stereoselectively are rare. To the best of our knowledge, there are only two reports that disclose access to enantioenriched 1,3-disubstituted isochromans from White[8] and Ghorai.[9]
Figure 1.
Mono- and disubstituted isochroman structural motifs in natural products and bioactive molecules.
Consequently, there is significant interest in the development of a general method that allows the use of achiral substrates to construct isochromans containing multiple stereogenic centers in enantiomerically pure form. To this end, multicomponent reaction strategies are particularly attractive because of their operational simplicity and high degree of convergence.[10]
The concept of Lewis base activation of Lewis acids[11] pioneered in these laboratories has proven to be a powerful method to functionalize unactivated olefins with high levels of stereocontrol. Combination of a suitable electrophilic sulfur source with a chiral selenophosphoramide catalyst results in a cationic donor−acceptor complex with increased electrophilic character on sulfur. The active catalytic species then transfers the sulfenium ion to the olefin to generate an enantiomerically enriched thiiranium ion, followed by a diastereospecific capture with a suitable nucleophilic partner (Scheme 1A).[12] The current scope of nucleophiles includes oxygen,[13] nitrogen[14] and carbon[15] moieties, acting in both an intra- and intermolecular fashion. This method also provides access to a wide variety of enantioenriched carbo- and heterocycles including complex polycyclic natural products.[16]
Scheme 1.
Lewis Base-Catalyzed Sulfenofunctionalization of Unactivated Alkenes.
Given our interest in developing a general and enantioselective process for the construction of substituted isochromans (and their tetrahydropyran parents) we envisioned the sulfenium-ion-initiated, cascade acetalization in Scheme 1B. In this case, a tetrahydropyran ring is generated by the opening of a thiiranium ion with a suitably disposed aldehyde oxygen,[17] and the resulting oxocarbenium ion is then captured by a second nucleophile in an intermolecular fashion. In view of the rich chemistry of sulfur that allows for downstream manipulations,[18–19] this strategy was appealing for the further generalization of sulfenofunctionalization.
Preliminary experiments employing various alcohols as stoichiometric nucleophiles to trap an oxocarbenium intermediate generated from opening a thiiranium ion were unsuccessful (See Supporting Information for full details). Thus, a search for a nucleophile that could be employed in solvent quantities was initiated. A recent disclosure from these laboratories identified hexafluoroisopropyl alcohol (HFIP) as an effective solvent for the Lewis base-catalyzed polyene sulfenocyclization.[16] HFIP has recently become a popular solvent or additive with applications across a spectrum of organic chemistry because it possesses unique properties owing to its mild acidity, attenuated nucleophilicity, as well as hydrogen bond donating ability.[20] Inspired by this finding, we tested HFIP for the desired sulfenoacetalization reaction. A number of orienting experiments revealed a combination of 5-hexenal 1a, sulfenylating agent 3 and HFIP in the presence of Lewis base catalyst 2 to give sulfenyl acetal 5a in 81% yield as a mixture of diastereomers (85:15 dr) with moderate enantioselectivity (70:30 er) (Table 1, entry 1). The relative configuration of the major product at this point was determined using NOE experiments. Lowering the temperature significantly decreased the reaction rate with no improvement of stereoselectivity (entry 2). However, much higher enantioselectivity was obtained using 2,6-diisopropylphenyl-substituted sulfenylating agent 4 without compromising yield of the acetal product 6a (entry 3). In agreement with our previous work,[12] discrimination of the enantiotopic faces of the alkene is predominantly governed by steric effects of the sulfenylating agent. Hence, increasing the steric bulk around the sulfur atom by incorporating ortho-isopropyl groups leads to enhanced enantiomeric ratio. Varying the concentration did not improve the reactivity or selectivity (entries 4–5), whereas using a slight excess of alkenal 1a relative to sulfenylating agent resulted in 94% isolated yield of acetal 6a while maintaining high enantioselectivity (entry 6).
Table 1.
Reaction Optimization.
![]() | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | PhthSAr | HFIP (M) | Temp (°C) | Yield 5a or 6a (%)[a],[b] | dr (α:β)[c] | er[d] |
| 1 | 3 | 0.1 | 25 | 76 (81) | 85:15 | 70:30 |
| 2[e] | 3 | 0.1 | 0 | 35 (41) | 85:15 | 70:30 |
| 3 | 4 | 0.1 | 25 | 85 (87) | 80:20 | 98:2 |
| 4 | 4 | 0.05 | 25 | 72 (77) | 80:20 | 98:2 |
| 5 | 4 | 0.2 | 25 | 81 (84) | 75:25 | 98:2 |
| 6[f] | 4 | 0.1 | 25 | 94 (97) | 80:20 | 98:2 |
Yield in parentheses determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis using 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane as an internal standard.
Isolated yield of the combined diastereomers.
Diastereomeric ratio determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude reaction mixture using an internal standard.
Determined by CSP-HPLC analysis for the major diastereomer.
Reaction performed for 48 h.
Reaction performed using 1.1 equiv of 1a.
Next, the substrate scope of the cascade sulfenoacetalization process was explored using a variety of linear alkenals (Table 2). Under optimized conditions the substrate bearing a trans-olefin gave product 6b in 89% yield with enhanced diastereoselectivity (88:12 dr) and high enantiomeric purity (97:3 er). The dr was further improved when the alkenal containing a gem-dimethyl moiety at the α-position to the carbonyl group was applied. Sulfenyl acetal 6c was obtained in good yield and excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity (>99:1 dr; 99:1 er). Equally high levels of stereocontrol were observed using a benzannulated substrate. The cyclization process proceeded smoothly to give isochroman-derived product 6d as a single diastereomer in 90% yield and 95:5 er. X-ray crystallographic analysis of 6d revealed the (S,S)-configuration,[21] which is in agreement with the preliminary assignment using NOE experiments and the predicted facial selectivity based on our previous studies.[12a] The preferential formation of the α-anomer may be a manifestation of the kinetic anomeric effect[22] resulting in the placement of the HFIP group in the axial position, however experimental confirmation was not possible. In addition, the enhanced diastereomeric ratio of the benzannulated product could be attributed to stabilization of the cationic oxocarbenium intermediate by the adjacent aryl substituent.[23]
Table 2.
|
All reactions performed on a 1.00 mmol scale.
Yield of isolated, analytically pure product.
Diastereomeric ratio determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
Enantiomeric ratio determined by CSP-HPLC analysis.
Reaction performed for 24 h using 1.00 mmol of 1d and 1.05 mmol of sulfenylating agent 4. Enantiomeric ratio in parentheses was obtained upon recrystallization.
Encouraged by the high levels of stereoselectivity observed in the sulfenoacetalization of the benzannulated alkenal, we continued our investigation of the reaction scope by evaluating this scaffold (Table 3). Various alkenals bearing electronically diverse substituents on the aromatic ring were effective substrates for this transformation. 4-Methyl-substituted isochroman derivative 6e was generated in 88% yield with excellent diastereo- and enantiocontrol.
Table 3.
|
All reactions performed on a 1.00 mmol scale.
Yield of isolated, analytically pure product.
Diastereomeric ratio determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
Enantiomeric ratio determined by CSP-HPLC analysis.
Diastereomeric and enantiomeric ratio in brackets were obtained upon trituration or single recrystallization.
Electron-withdrawing groups on the aromatic ring were compatible and afforded highly enantioenriched acetal products 6f-6i, with slightly reduced dr for the substrate bearing a CF3-group in the 4-position (88:12 dr). Single diastereomers were obtained using 4- and 3-OMe-substituted alkenals with high and moderate enantioselectivity of the corresponding products 6j and 6k. Sulfenoacetalization of the electron-rich benzodioxole and naphthyl substrates, as well as the indole-derived alkenal proceeded efficiently to give isochromans 6l-6n in high yield, excellent dr and er. Notably, when benzannulation was changed to a cyclohexene-derived substrate, the reactivity dropped dramatically. Sulfenyl acetal 6o was obtained in a moderate 45% yield, although diastereo- and enantioselectivity remained high. The scope was further extended by varying the alkene substituent. An (E)-configured alkene performed well to afford product 6p bearing three stereocenters in a highly efficient and stereoselective manner (>99:1 dr; 95:5 er). Sulfenyl acetal 6q generated from a (Z)-alkenal was isolated in excellent yield and diastereoselectivity but poor enantioselectivity (62:38). The reason for the poor recognition of (Z)-alkenes is the topology of BINAM-derived catalyst 2. Having diagonally symmetric quadrants of occupied and unoccupied space, the catalytically active species is suited for differentiating the enantiotopic faces of (E)-alkenes, but not other alkenes.[12] 1,1,2-Trisubstituted olefin underwent the sulfenoacetalization process in good yield and high diastereocontrol, however moderate enantioselectivity (6r, 75:25 er). Using a homologated substrate led to formation of highly enantioenriched 7-membered acetal 6s in synthetically useful yield and good diastereoselectivity. Importantly, the dr can be further improved by a single recrystallization (98:2 dr).
In the next stage of this work, synthetic manipulation of the isochroman-derived sulfenyl acetals was explored using enantiomerically enriched product 6d (>99:1 dr, 99:1 er) (Table 4). The acetal moiety allowed for a variety of useful derivatizations. For example, mild reduction with a Lewis acid and triethylsilane in CH2Cl2/HFIP afforded the enantioenriched sulfenyl ether 7 in 93% yield.[24] Transacetalization with MeOH under acidic conditions gave corresponding methyl acetal 8 preserving high diastereo- and enantioselectivity (93:7 dr; 99:1 er).[24a] Treatment of 6d with allyltrimethylsilane or TMSCN resulted in a stereoselective C-C-bond formation, and corresponding products 9 and 10 were obtained in 98% and 90% yield respectively, with good levels of diastereocontrol.[24]
Table 4.
|
All reactions performed on a 1.00 mmol scale.
Yield of isolated, analytically pure product.
Diastereomeric ratio determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
Enantiomeric ratio determined by CSP-HPLC analysis.
Diastereomeric and enantiomeric ratio in brackets were obtained upon trituration or single recrystallization.
Enantiomeric ratio of the corresponding alcohol was determined by CSP-HPLC analysis.
Furthermore, exchange of HFIP acetal with (phenylthio)trimethylsilane afforded thioacetal 11 in 98% yield, which is an effective precursor of oxocarbenium intermediates.[25] The acetal moiety can also be oxidized in the presence of Raney nickel[26] in HFIP to furnish lactone 12 in 78% yield and 98:2 er. To further demonstrate the product diversification, thioether moiety of 6d was selectively oxidized with H2O2 in HFIP to give a 1:1 mixture of sulfoxides 13 in 84% yield. Treatment of the obtained sulfoxides with triflic anhydride and 2,6-lutidine followed by basic hydrolysis enabled efficient one-pot Pummerer rearrangement.[27] Corresponding aldehyde 14 was isolated in 79% yield as a single diastereomer without erosion of enantiopurity (>99:1 dr; 99:1 er).
In summary, a diastereo- and enantioselective Lewis base-catalyzed sulfenoacetalization of alkenyl aldehydes has been described. Under mild conditions (no strong acid/base, ambient temperature, in air), the reaction proceeds via intramolecular capture of the enantioenriched thiiranium ion with the aldehyde functionality followed by intermolecular acetalization. This method enables preparation of highly enantioenriched dihydropyran and 1,3-disubstituted isochroman motifs bearing multiple stereogenic centers in synthetically useful yields. The products were shown to undergo further synthetic transformations to afford valuable building blocks by exploiting both acetal and thioether moieties.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the National Institutes of Health (GM R35 127010) for generous financial support. We also thank the UIUC SCS support facilities (microanalysis, mass spectrometry, and NMR spectroscopy) for their assistance.
References
- [1].(a) Xu J, Kjer J, Sendker J, Wray V, Guan H, Edrada R, Muller WEG, Bayer M, Lin W, Wu J, Proksch P, Bioorg. Med. Chem 2009, 17, 7362–7367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) TenBrink RE, Bergh CCL, Duncan JN, Harris DW, Huff RM, Lahti RA, Lawson CF, Lutzke BS, Martin IJ, Rees SA, Schlachter SK, Sih JC, Smith MWJ, Med. Chem 1996, 39, 2435–2437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Li W, Lee C, Bang SH, Ma JY, Kim S, Koh Y-S, Shim SH, J. Nat. Prod 2017, 80, 205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Larghi EL, Kaufman TS, Synthesis 2006, 2, 187–220. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Reisman SE, Doyle AG, Jacobsen EN, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 7198–7199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Maity P, Srinivas HD, Watson MP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 17142–17145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Meng Z, Sun S, Yuan H, Lou H, Liu L, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 543–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Chung YK, Fu GC, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2009, 48, 2225–2227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ravindra B, Maity S, Das BG, J. Org. Chem 2015, 80, 7008–7018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Ammann SE, Liu W, White MC, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 9571–9575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Maity S, Parhi B, Ghorai P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 7723–7727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].For recent books and reviews on multicomponent reactions, see:; (a) Zhu J, Bienaymé H, Multicomponent Reactions, Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005. [Google Scholar]; (b) Dömling A, Chem. Rev 2006, 106, 17–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Herrera RP, Marqués-López E, Multicomponent Reactions: Concepts and Applications for Design and Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Vedejs E, Denmark SE, Lewis Base Catalysis in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- [12].(a) Denmark SE, Hartmann E, Kornfilt DJP, Wang H, Nat. Chem 2014, 6, 1056–1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hartmann E, Denmark SE, Helv. Chim. Acta 2017, 100, e1700158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].(a) Denmark SE, Kornfilt DJP, Vogler T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 15308–15311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Denmark SE, Kornfilt DJP, J. Org. Chem 2017, 82, 3192–3222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].(a) Denmark SE, Chi HM, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 8915–8918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Denmark SE, Chi HM, J. Org. Chem 2017, 82, 3826–3843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].(a) Denmark SE, Jaunet A, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 6419–6422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Denmark SE, Jaunet A, J. Org. Chem 2014, 79, 140–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Tao Z, Robb KA, Panger JL J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 15621–15625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Tao Z, Robb KA, Zhao K, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 3569–3573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].For selected applications of ketones and aldehydes as O-nulceophiles see:; (a) Jackson WP, Ley SV, Morton J, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun 1980, 1028–1029. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ley SV, Lygo B, Molines H, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1984, 2403–2405. [Google Scholar]; (c) Brussani G, Ley SV, Wright JL, Williams DJ, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1986, 303–307. [Google Scholar]; (d) Hamilton JY, ssler SL, Carreira EM, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 8082–8085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Rössler SL, Schreib BS, Ginterseder M, Hamilton JY, Carreira EM, Org. Lett 2017, 19, 5533–5536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wang Y, Zhang W-Y, You S-L, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 2228–2232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].(a) Metzner P, Thuillier A, Sulfur Reagents in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1994. [Google Scholar]; (b) Organosulfur Chemistry: Synthetic Aspects (Ed.: Page P), Academic Press: London, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- [19].Simpkins NS, Sulfones in Organic Synthesis, Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- [20].For the recent perspective on the role of HFIP and its properties see:; Colomer I, Chamberlain AER, Haughey MB, Donohoe TJ, Nat. Rev. Chem 2017, 1, 0088. [Google Scholar]
- [21].CCDC 1909177 contains the crystallographic data for compound 6d. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center; (www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk). [Google Scholar]
- [22].(a) Kirby AJ, Stereoelectronic Effects on Reactivity: The Kinetic Anomeric Effect In: The Anomeric Effect and Related Stereoelectronic Effects at Oxygen. Reactivity and Structure Concepts in Organic Chemistry, vol 15, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983, pp. 78–135. [Google Scholar]; (b) Juaristi E, Cuevas G, The Kinetic Anomeric Effect In: The Anomeric Effect. CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1995; pp. 183–192. [Google Scholar]; (c) Cumpstey I, Org. Biomol. Chem 2012, 10, 2503–2508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Das R, Mukhopadhyay B, ChemistryOpen 2016, 5, 401–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].(a) Walters JC, Tierno AF, Dubin AH, Wengryniuk SE, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2018, 1460–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kelley BT, Walters JC, Wengryniuk SE, Org. Lett 2016, 18, 1896–1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].For applications of thioacetals in synthesis see: [Google Scholar]; (a) Nicolaou KC, Dolle RE, Papahatjis DP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1984, 106, 4189–4192. [Google Scholar]; (b) Toshima K, Tatsuta K, Chem. Rev 1993, 93, 1503–1531. [Google Scholar]; (c) Crich D, Lim LBL, Org. React 2004, 64, 115–251. [Google Scholar]
- [26].For the related oxidations of alcohols with Raney nickel see:; Krafft ME, III Branka Zorc WJC, Milczanowski SE, J. Org. Chem 1988, 53, 3159–3163. [Google Scholar]
- [27].(a) Pummerer R, Chem. Ber 1909, 42, 2282–2291. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bur SK, Padwa A, Chem. Rev 2004, 104, 2401–2432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Feldman KS, Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 5003–5034. [Google Scholar]; (d) Akai S, Kita Y, Curr. Chem 2007, 274, 35–76. [Google Scholar]; (e) Smith LHS, Coote SC, Sneddon HF, Procter DJ, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 5832–5844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



