Abstract
Several postmortem studies have reported lower levels of immunoreactivity (IR) for microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) in several cortical regions of individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). However, whether this effect is conserved across multiple brain areas within an individual with SZ or if it is regionally-specific remains unclear. We characterized patterns of MAP2-IR across three cortical regions at different levels of the rostral-caudal axis within individual subjects with and without SZ. MAP2-IR levels were measured in deep layer 3 of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP), and primary visual cortex (V1). Postmortem tissue containing each cortical region was derived from 20 pairs of SZ subjects and nonpsychiatric comparison (NPC) subjects matched perfectly for sex, and as closely as possible for age and postmortem interval. MAP2-IR was assessed by quantitative fluorescence microscopy. We observed significantly lower levels of MAP2-IR in SZ subjects relative to NPC subjects, without a significant region by diagnosis interaction. Logs of the within-pair ratios (SZ:NPC) of MAP2-IR were significantly correlated across the three regions. These findings demonstrate that MAP2-IR deficits in SZ are consistent across three neocortical regions within individual subjects. This pattern of MAP2-IR deficit has implications for therapeutic development and future investigations of MAP2 pathology in SZ.
Subject terms: Cellular neuroscience, Schizophrenia
Introduction
Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), a group of proteins critical to cytoskeletal function, regulate cellular development and maintenance by way of microtubule stabilization/bundling, recruitment of signaling molecules, and modulation of microtubule-mediated cellular transport.1 MAP2, a MAP family member which is expressed mainly in neuronal dendrites,2 frequently exhibits lower levels of immunoreactivity (IR) in the postmortem tissue of subjects with schizophrenia (SZ) when compared with nonpsychiatric comparison (NPC) subjects. This has been observed in the subiculum,3,4 the olfactory bulbs,5 entorhinal cortex,3 and Brodmann areas 9, 32, and 41.6–8 These deficits in MAP2-IR do not seem to result from changes in neuron number, MAP2 mRNA expression, or protein levels,7,9,10 but instead seem suggestive of a posttranslational modification (PTM) to the protein. This robust finding fits into a larger theme of cytoskeletal dysregulation in SZ; abnormalities in cytoskeletal organization networks have become increasingly implicated in SZ pathogenesis through the evidence of large-scale genomic studies, proteomic analyses, and immunohistochemical assays.11–13 However, because prior studies of MAP2-IR in SZ have examined either a single brain area, or two physically proximate brain areas, it remains unclear whether lower MAP2-IR is regionally specific or is present across the cerebral cortex within individuals with SZ. Similarly, prior studies have not tested whether the magnitude of MAP2-IR deficits are consistent across regions within subjects, although finding that MAP2-IR deficits are conserved across cortical regions within individuals with SZ would motivate future studies of the mechanisms surrounding MAP2 pathology with the goal of developing therapeutic intervention strategies.
Herein, we characterize within-subject MAP2-IR in SZ across three regions located in separate lobes of the cerebral cortex. MAP2-IR was measured in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; BA46), lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP; BA7), and primary visual cortex (V1; BA17) using quantitative confocal fluorescent microscopy. These cortical regions are dispersed across the rostral–caudal axis (Fig. 1a), are collectively implicated in visuospatial working memory14,15 and show functional impairment in SZ.16–18 We observed significantly lower levels of MAP2-IR in SZ subjects compared with NPC subjects. There was no interaction between region and diagnosis, indicating that the degree of IR deficit did not differ significantly between regions. Within-pair ratios (SZ:NPC) of MAP2-IR were significantly correlated across regions. These data indicate that within individuals with SZ, MAP2-IR deficits can exist across multiple cortical areas.
Results
We initially sought to determine whether MAP2-IR (as defined by greyscale intensity [see “Methods” section]) was lower in SZ subjects as predicted. In addition, we asked whether MAP2-IR differed across cortical regions. Qualitatively, images from SZ tissue frequently exhibited a paucity of MAP2 labeling relative to NPC tissue (Fig. 2). We first determined whether the diagnostic effect on MAP2-IR varied across the three regions. No region by diagnosis interaction effect on loge(MAP2-IR) was observed in our analysis (F2,74 = 1.7 and p = 0.19). Once we had established that any diagnostic effect was common across the regions, we assessed the main effects of both diagnosis and region. Our RM-ANOVA model identified significant effects of both diagnosis (F1,19 = 31.1 and p < 0.001) and region (F2,74 = 46.4 and p < 0.001) on loge(MAP2-IR). SZ subjects exhibited lower MAP2-IR, and MAP2-IR tended to increase moving toward rostral cortex (Fig. 3a). Average loge(MAP2-IR) deficits between SZ subjects and matched NPC subjects of 17.0% (V1), 22.8% (LIP), and 19.5% (DLPFC) represented linear MAP2-IR deficits of 69.6%, 69.3%, and 56%, respectively. MAP2-IR values are represented in linear scale in Supplementary Fig. 1. The effect of diagnosis was also apparent when MAP2-IR levels were averaged across region within individuals (Fig. 3b). MAP2-IR decrease was observed between most matched pairs of subjects in all regions; MAP2-IR of an NPC subject numerically exceeded MAP2-IR of the paired SZ subject in 15/19 pairs at V1, 17/19 pairs at DLPFC, and 16/20 pairs at LIP (Fig. 3c–e). This was also reflected in matched pair loge(MAP2-IR) ratios (SZ:NPC) (Fig. 3f).
Finally, we examined interregional patterns of loge(MAP2-IR) ratios (SZ:NPC). Correlation analysis revealed strong conservation of pairwise ratios across regions, indicating that within a given subject with SZ, MAP2-IR deficits are similar across the three cortical regions examined (Fig. 4).
In addition, the possible confounding effects of several clinical and cohort variables on MAP2-IR were assessed. MAP2-IR was not significantly associated with age, tissue storage time, sex, or postmortem interval (PMI), though it was significantly and positively associated with pH (Table 2). However, incorporating tissue pH as a fixed effect in our statistical model did not diminish the effect of diagnosis (F1,18 = 23.7, p < 0.001). Further, pairwise MAP2-IR differences did not depend significantly on the use of nicotine, antipsychotics, antidepressants, or benzodiazepine/valproic acid (VPA) at time of death (Table 2). Finally, none of the regions exhibited a significant diagnosis by run effect (V1: F4,14 = 1.09, p = 0.40; LIP: F4,14 = 0.31, p = 0.87, DLPFC: F4,14 = 0.03, p > 0.99), indicating that assay run did not contribute to the effect of diagnosis.
Table 2.
Δloge(MAP2-IR) | F 1,34 | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | −0.03 | 1.69 | 0.20 |
Sex (M = Y, F = N) | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.64 |
PMI | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.85 |
pH | 1.96 | 6.66 | 0.01 |
Storage time | 0.01 | 1.81 | 0.19 |
F 1,19 | p | ||
Asphyxiation | −0.72 | 1.7 | 0.21 |
Hypoxia | −0.74 | 1.2 | 0.29 |
Ischemia | −1.42 | 4.2 | 0.06 |
AHI | −1.23 | 7.0 | 0.02 |
Δ% Pairwise loge(MAP2-IR) change (Y group – N group) | t 15 a | p | |
Nicotine use ATOD | −4.99 | 0.55 | 0.59 |
t 16 | p | ||
Antipsychotic use ATOD | −16.74 | 1.07 | 0.30 |
Antidepressant use ATOD | −2.05 | −0.27 | 0.79 |
Benzodiazepine/VPA use ATOD | −2.33 | −0.28 | 0.78 |
Δloge(MAP2-IR) is defined as Y–N group for dichotomous variables, or the slope of each continuous variable on MAP2-IR. AHI is a combined variable indicating the presence of asphyxiation, hypoxia, and/or ischemia (see text and Supplementary Table 1)
ATOD at time of death
aNicotine ATOD status was unknown for one subject
Asphyxiation, hypoxia, and ischemia have previously been shown to reduce numbers of MAP2-IR-positive neurons in human neocortex and hippocampus.19,20 We examined the effect of these phenomena on MAP2-IR in our cohort using data regarding subjects’ medical conditions, causes of death and identified neuropathologies (Supplementary Table 1). There was a trend for the combined variable Asphyxiation/Hypoxia/Ischemia (AHI) (see “Methods” section) to have been present more frequently in SZ subjects (Table 1). None of the three variables individually associated with MAP2-IR in our cohort; however, the combined variable was associated with decreased MAP2-IR (Table 2). Nevertheless, when the combined variable was entered into our RM-ANOVA model, it was no longer significantly associated with MAP2-IR (F1,19 = 2.3, p = 0.15), whereas the effect of diagnosis remained significant (F1,19 = 21.3, p < 0.001).
Table 1.
NPC | Schizophrenia (SZ) | |
---|---|---|
n | 20 | 20 |
Age, mean ± SD | 47.7 ± 9.5 | 45.4 ± 9.3 |
Sex, M/F | 14/6 | 14/6 |
pH, mean ± SD | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.3 |
PMI, hours ± SD | 15.5 ± 5.7 | 14.5 ± 6.1 |
Storage time, months ± SD | 114.1 ± 42.8 | 113.6 ± 48.9 |
Nicotine ATOD, Y/N | 14/4 | |
Antipsychotic ATOD, Y/N | 18/2 | |
Antidepressant ATOD, Y/N | 11/9 | |
Benzodiazepine/VPA ATOD, Y/N | 5/15 | |
Asphyxiation, Y/N | 3/17 | 8/12 |
Hypoxia, Y/N | 4/16 | 4/16 |
Ischemia, Y/N | 0/20 | 5/15 |
AHI, Y/N | 6/14 | 12/8 |
Diagnostic groups showed no significant differences in age (t37 = 0.68, p = 0.50), PMI (t37 = 0.55, p = 0.58), storage time (t37 = 0.14, p = 0.89), pH (t34 = 1.79, p = 0.08), nor in frequency of asphyxiation (X2[1,N = 20] = 3.13, p = 0.08), ischemia (X2[1,N = 20] = 3.66, p = 0.06), hypoxia, or the presence of one or more of these risk variables (AHI; see text) (X2[1,N = 20] = 3.64, p = 0.06). Additional cohort details can be found in Supplementary Table 1
SD standard deviation, PMI postmortem interval, M male, F female, ATOD at time of death, AHI asphyxiation/hypoxia/ischemia (see text)
Discussion
We here demonstrate that MAP2-IR deficits are correlated across multiple cortical lobes within individuals with SZ. MAP2-IR loss between SZ subjects and matched NPC subjects was conserved across three cortical regions: DLPFC, LIP, and V1.
Evidence of MAP2-IR reductions in SZ has accumulated so steadily in recent decades that the phenomenon was recently described as a molecular “hallmark” of the disorder.13 Quantitative and qualitative decreases in MAP2-IR have been identified in SZ postmortem brain tissue in cortical areas spanning the frontal and temporal lobes.3–8 Here we demonstrate significantly lower levels of MAP2-IR across DLPFC, LIP, and V1 within individual subjects with SZ. While patterns of MAP2-IR loss across cortex within individuals with SZ have not been directly investigated prior to this work, several postmortem studies have assayed multiple brain regions in the same subject pool, finding similar IR losses across regions; for instance, Arnold et al.3 measured MAP2-IR levels in both entorhinal cortex and subiculum using a single cohort of six SZ-diagnosed subjects (compared with six healthy controls), reporting qualitatively absent MAP2 staining in five and four SZ subjects in each respective area. Similarly, Jones et al.6 found significant reductions in layer III MAP2-positive area fraction at Brodmann areas 9 and 32 (36% each) without changes in neuron number, using a single cohort of seven SZ/NPC pairs. These examples of consistent within-cohort reductions in the hippocampal formation and the PFC are consistent with our finding of MAP2-IR reductions that are conserved across cerebral cortex lobes within individuals with SZ.
However, Jones et al.6 also reported no significant changes in MAP2 area fraction within V1 of SZ subjects. Moreover, this pattern was recapitulated in a later study21 finding a significantly smaller layer III MAP2 area fraction in BA9 and a nonsignificant change in BA17. This contrasts with a significant reduction in MAP2-IR at V1 described in the present work. Differences in both methodology and experimental design might contribute to inconsistent results in this region. The binary thresholding of MAP2-IR employed in area fraction analysis may be insensitive to diagnosis-dependent reductions in IR intensity that are more modest yet retain dendritic morphology. Notably, in our data, V1 exhibited the lowest levels of MAP2-IR among the regions studied for both diagnostic groups (Fig. 3f); this may limit the detectability of MAP2-IR positive area in this region. However, strong correlations with IR reductions in DLPFC and LIP (Fig. 4) as well as our larger cohort size (n = 40) lend support to our conclusion that the observed MAP2-IR reduction in V1 is a biologically relevant effect. MAP2-IR changes in SZ parietal cortex, to the best of our knowledge, have never been previously analyzed.
This effect of diagnosis is not driven by effects of clinical or tissue variables, including age, sex, tissue storage time, tissue pH, or PMI. To minimize any possible influence of confounding factors, subject pairs were matched as closely as possible by these parameters (Supplementary Table 1). There were no significant differences in any such variables between diagnostic groups with the exception of tissue pH (Table 1). Reductions in pH have previously been reported for postmortem tissue of SZ subjects and may arise as a consequence of antipsychotic treatment.22 Incorporating tissue pH as a fixed effect in our statistical model did not diminish the significant effect of diagnosis, however, indicating that tissue pH alone cannot explain the observed differences in MAP2-IR between diagnostic groups. One prior study, in a rodent model of PMI, found that MAP2-IR was qualitatively reduced after 2 h of PMI, then remained stable through 48 h.23 Our finding of no association of PMI with MAP2-IR (Table 2) is consistent with this prior report, as all of our subjects fell into this latter 2–48 h PMI range. The use of various medications at time of death also did not significantly affect MAP2-IR (Table 2), indicating that MAP2-IR loss is not a side effect of medical treatment. We have previously also failed to observe an effect of antipsychotic medications on MAP2-IR in a small nonhuman primate cohort in primary auditory cortex.7
Moreover, the MAP2-IR changes reported herein do not appear to reflect decreases in neuron number. Neuron density remains unchanged in SZ frontal, parietal, or occipital neocortex24 and has shown no change by diagnosis in BA17 or is increased.25,26 It is also unlikely to result from reduced MAP2 mRNA or protein levels. MAP2 mRNA is unaltered in the hippocampus9 or layer III pyramidal cells10 of SZ subjects, and no change in MAP2 peptide levels was observed by LC-MS in our work in BA41 within subjects in whom MAP2-IR reductions were profound.7,8 Various proteomic assays of SZ have failed to observe any alterations in MAP2 protein levels in DLPFC27–29 anterior cingulate cortex30,31 or hippocampus32,33 despite frequent alterations in other cytoskeletal proteins (such as tubulin) in such assays. From this evidence combined, we can reasonably conclude that the observed MAP2-IR reduction is not an artifact of clinical or postmortem confounds, nor a pathology secondary to MAP2 transcript/protein loss, but instead reflects a specific SZ-associated alteration in the MAP2 protein which occurs throughout cerebral cortex.
Though the cause(s) of MAP2-IR reduction in SZ remain unknown, one hypothesis3,4,7 posits that lack of antigen binding results from a shift in protein structure precipitated by changes in PTM of MAP2. In particular, MAP2 is known to be heavily regulated by phosphorylation.34 We have recently communicated the differential expression of five MAP2 phosphopeptides in SZ, showing that MAP2 phosphorylation state is altered in the disorder.35 Interestingly, MAP2 phosphorylation state appears to represent a convergence point for several upstream, SZ-relevant signaling pathways. MAP2 phosphorylation is directly or indirectly modulated by several proteins which are clearly identified by unbiased genomic studies as contributing to SZ risk36–38 including MAPK family member MAPK3,39 voltage-gated calcium ion channels40 and NMDA receptors.41–43
Direct alterations to MAP2 structure through aberrant PTMs could go on to affect MAP2 function; the site-specific phosphorylation state of MAP2, for instance, is known to affect its microtubule-binding, -polymerizing, and -stabilizing capabilities34,44,45 and therefore could contribute to regulation of the dendritic microtubule cytoskeleton. Indeed, olfactory neuronal precursors derived from individuals with SZ exhibit disorganized microtubule networks as evidenced by βIII-tubulin staining,46 implicating aberrant microtubule organization in SZ. In turn, microtubules have become increasingly implicated in dendritic spine development, maintenance, and postsynaptic plasticity.47–51 Consistent with these observations, we have noted that SZ-associated reductions in spine density in primary auditory cortex are restricted to individuals with low MAP2-IR.7,8 Further understanding the underlying sources of MAP2-IR reductions and their impact on microtubule function, therefore, holds potential as a therapeutic target to rescue SZ-associated abnormalities in synaptic structure.
The generalization of cortical MAP2-IR loss reported herein will be a significant point of consideration in future investigations of MAP2 pathology in SZ. For example, the present findings raise the possibility that the positive correlation between MAP2-IR and dendritic spine density we observed in BA417,8 could exist in other brain areas; indeed, reductions in spine density have previously been reported in SZ DLPFC52 and subiculum.53 In addition, a widespread pattern of MAP2-IR loss in SZ suggests that this MAP2 modification is a robust biomarker of the disorder which, if causally related to SZ symptoms, may be amenable to therapeutic intervention. Our data, combined with prior studies, suggest that SZ-associated MAP2 alterations might affect numerous cognitive and sensory cortical areas across the brain within a given subject. Further, our failure to observe a significant diagnosis by region interaction effect on MAP2-IR suggests that MAP2-associated pathologies in SZ similarly affect these different cortical areas. As such, interventions which target SZ-associated MAP2 alterations, such as phosphorylation, may be broadly useful in the treatment of SZ. Such intervention, if implemented globally, also may have potential to improve functionality of neural networks spanning multiple cortical areas, such as that involved in visuospatial-working memory, which is impaired in SZ patients.54,55
However, if MAP2 can be targeted therapeutically, such treatments are not likely to benefit all SZ-diagnosed patients. In our previous work in primary auditory cortex, we described subsets of subjects with SZ who exhibited “normal” levels of MAP2-IR (higher than the lowest NPC value,7 or above the 25th percentile of NPC MAP2-IR8), indicating that MAP2 pathology is not present in all individuals with SZ. It is also possible that in some individuals, disruptions in MAP2 activity are to an extent compensated for through the actions of other MAPs, reducing any potential benefit from a MAP2-directed treatment. While MAP2 mRNA/protein deficiency has been shown to result in reduced neurite outgrowth and aberrant microtubule organization both in vitro and in vivo,56–59 MAP2 knockout (KO) is nonlethal in the mouse until combined with MAP1b KO.60 Conversely, MAP1b KO-associated deficits in axonal length are rescued through MAP2c overexpression,60 further indicating overlapping functionality of the two MAPs. Therefore, the careful subcategorization of individuals with SZ based on severity of MAP2 pathology would be necessary to effectively utilize MAP2 as a therapeutic target.
In conclusion, MAP2-IR was assessed in DLPFC, LIP, and V1 of SZ subjects compared with NPC subjects. We found significant diagnosis-dependent reductions in MAP2-IR. The effect was similar across cortical regions within subject pairs. These data provide evidence of a global cortical MAP2-IR decrease in SZ and further elevate the MAP2 protein as a valuable therapeutic target, possibly capable of yielding improvement in multiple symptom domains. However, further studies to characterize the prevalence of MAP2 pathology in SZ, the source of MAP2-IR loss, and the extent, nature, and consequences of functional changes to MAP2 in the disorder (if any) will all be necessary to harness its therapeutic potential.
Methods
Human subjects
After receiving consent from next-of-kin, brain tissue was obtained during autopsies at the Allegheny County Office of the Medical Examiner and consensus DSM-IV diagnoses were made by an independent committee of experienced clinicians on the basis of clinical records and interviews with surviving relatives who have expressed written informed consent.52,61 These procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board for Biomedical Research at the University of Pittsburgh and Committee for Oversight of Research and Clinical Training Involving the Dead. Each SZ subject was matched to an NPC subject for sex and as closely as possible for age and PMI. See Table 1 for cohort details. The left hemisphere of each brain was blocked coronally, immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer for 48 h, equilibrated in a series of graded sucrose solutions, and stored at −30 °C in an antifreeze solution. Cryostat sections were cut at 40 µm and sections containing V1, DLPFC, and LIP, as identified based on anatomic location (Fig. 1 b–d) and cytoarchitectural features of adjacent (within 400 µm) Nissl-stained sections (Fig. 5), were chosen for staining (one section per region per subject) and stored in antifreeze solution at −30 °C.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Samples were processed across five IHC runs. All regions of interest from a subject pair were processed in the same run. MAP2-IR was detected as previously described7,8 using monoclonal antibody SMI-52 (1:500, Biolegend cat#801801). SMI-52 has been shown to react with mammalian MAP2 both in culture and in fixed sections, robustly labeling the soma and dendritic arbor of neurons in human tissue.62 In immunoblot experiments, SMI-52 recognizes all isoforms of MAP2 (MAP2A, MAP2B, MAP2C, and MAP2D).8,63
Tissue was rinsed in phosphate buffer (0.1 M in distilled H2O) 3 × 8 min. Sections were pre treated at room temperature in 1% NaBH4 for 30 min to reduce auto-fluorescence before being rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (8 × 3 min) and incubated in Triton-X (0.3% in PBS) at room temperature for 30 min. Tissue was then incubated for 2.5 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (20% normal goat serum [Jackson Immunoresearch cat#005-000-121], 20% normal human serum [Jackson Immunoresearch cat#009-000-121], 1% BSA, 0.1% Lysine, and 0.1% Glycine in PBS) before overnight incubation (24 h) at 4 °C in incubation solution (5% normal goat serum, 5% normal human serum, 1% BSA, 0.1% Lysine, and 0.1% Glycine in PBS) with SMI-52 antibody. Samples were rinsed in PBS (4 × 30 min) before overnight incubation at 4 °C in incubation solution containing biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:200, Vector Laboratories cat#BA-9200). In addition, Phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 568 (15 µL/mL, Thermo Scientific cat#A12380) was included in this incubation solution to allow for a MAP2-IR-independent assessment of tissue thickness and Z-position within the sections during imaging.
Sections were then rinsed again before overnight incubation with streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647 (1:500, Thermo Scientific cat#S32357). Finally, samples were rinsed before mounting on gel-coated slides. Tissue was left to dry at least 1 h before rehydration in distilled H2O to minimize shrinkage. Samples were coverslipped with Vectashield hard-set H-1400 mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) then left to dry at room temperature overnight before storage at 4 °C until imaging.
Tissue sampling
All samples were coded to blind the experimenter (RAD) to diagnosis prior to sampling. Cortical deep layer 3 was systematically approximated as 35–50% of total depth from pial surface to white matter based on Nissl-stained histology (Fig. 5). Contours outlining this layer were drawn in Stereo Investigator version 8 (MicroBrightField Inc., Natick, MA). Sites (≥10) of 54.12 µm2 within each contour were assigned using a randomly-rotated sampling grid generated in Stereo Investigator, where grid size equaled the square root of the total contour size divided by 10. Tissue thickness was recorded at each sampling site and did not differ between diagnostic groups (F1,1171 = 0.73, p = 0.39).
Confocal microscopy
Images were taken using a 1.42 numerical aperture ×60 supercorrected oil objective mounted on an Olympus BX51Wl confocal microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) equipped with an Olympus DSU spinning disk, Hamamatsu Orca R2 camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ), MBF CX9000 front-mounted digital camera (MicroBrightField Inc., Natick, MA), BioPrecision2 XYZ motorized stage with linear XYZ encoders (Ludl Electronic Products Ltd, Hawthorne, NY), excitation and emission filter wheels (Ludl Electronic Products Ltd, Hawthorne, NY), Sedat Quad 89000 filter set (Chroma Technology Corp., Bellows Falls, VT), and a Lumen 220 metal halide lamp (Prior Scientific, Rockland, MA). 2D images were taken in Slidebook software version 5.027 at 2 μm below tissue surface as done previously,7,8 using 647 nm excitation for MAP2-IR and 405 nm excitation to capture lipofuscin auto-fluorescence. Lipofuscin is a pigment consisting of lysosomal degradation products that accumulates with age and is abundant in postmortem human brain tissue. Exposure times were optimized for the best spread of intensity histogram data in an NPC tissue section and thereafter kept constant across all subjects (100 ms for 647 nm excitation and 500 ms for 405 nm excitation). Subject pairs and their respective regions of interest were always imaged on the same day, in a randomized order. Ten assigned sites were imaged within each contour except when unavailable due to the following exclusions: sites with large auto-fluorescent features such as blood vessels were excluded from analysis, as were tissue sections which sustained significant damage during coverslipping and/or imaging. This resulted in a total of 1175 2D images. For further detail (including total area sampled by subject and region), see Supplementary Table 1.
Image processing
Processing occurred in Slidebook with keystrokes automated by Automation Anywhere software (Automation Anywhere, Denver, CO). 647 channel emissions of the 2D images were masked using threshold segmentation defined by a Ridler–Calvard (RC)-derived value in Slidebook. 405 channel emissions were manually masked and subtracted from the 647 channel RC mask to avoid the confound of lipofuscin auto-fluorescence (Fig. 6). This generated the final mask from which grayscale intensity data was extracted. Averages across sites within each tissue section were calculated to yield a single MAP2-IR value per subject per region for analysis. Camera background was subtracted from the data prior to analysis.
Statistics
MAP2-IR values were loge-transformed for all statistical analyses to achieve a more normal distribution of the data. To analyze diagnostic and region effects on MAP2-IR, a repeated measures analysis of the variance (RM-ANOVA) model of mean loge(MAP2-IR) value was used, with pair, diagnosis, region, and diagnosis by region as fixed effects and subject as a random effect to account for the multiple measurements per subject. To assess the possible confounding effects of cohort variables including age, sex, PMI, tissue pH, and tissue storage time, another RM-ANOVA model for mean loge(MAP2-IR) values was used, containing region, main effects of each cohort variable, and region by cohort variable interaction as fixed effects and subject as a random effect. For IHC run, an ANOVA model with pair and diagnosis by run as fixed effects was used to analyze each region separately. To more robustly examine the possible confounding effect of tissue pH, a third RM-ANOVA model was used for the mean loge(MAP2-IR) value in each region, including pair, region, diagnosis, and tissue pH as fixed effects and subject as a random effect. Further, effects of hypoxia and ischemia—both of which have been previously shown to impact MAP2 immunolabeling19,20—were assessed by assigning all subjects a binary score to indicate the presence or absence of (1) a cause of death involving asphyxiation, (2) a medical condition likely to induce hypoxia, (3) a neuropathology indicative of ischemic injury, or (4) a combined variable, asphyxiation/hypoxia/ischemia (AHI), indicating the presence of any of the three (Supplementary Table 1). The effects of these variables on MAP2-IR were assessed using RM-ANOVA models, where each model contained region and pair as fixed effects and subject as a random effect. In addition, Chi square tests of independence were performed to test for changes in frequency of these risk factors between diagnostic groups. To test for interregional conservation of MAP2-IR loss within pairs, a Pearson correlation coefficient matrix was calculated between the pairwise loge(MAP2-IR) difference (=log[MAP2-IRSZ/MAP2-IRNPC]) of each region. For dichotomous variables, including nicotine, antipsychotic, antidepressant, and benzodiazepine/VPA use at time of death, equal variance t-tests were used to test equality across the dichotomy of the pairwise percent loge(MAP2-IR) difference (=100 × [log(MAP2-IRSZ/MAP2-IRNPC)]) between groups.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the following federal grants: MH071533 (R.A.S.) and MH103204 (D.A.L.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States Government.
Author contributions
R.A.S. and D.A.L. conceived the idea for this study. A.M.D., R.A.S., K.N.F., and D.A.L. selected and prepared tissue sections for use in the present study. R.A.D. carried out the immunohistochemical assays, confocal imaging, and image processing described in this work with assistance from J.T.N. and wrote the paper with support from R.A.S. and D.A.L. Statistical analyses were performed by R.M.K. and A.R.S.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
R.A.D., R.M.K., A.M.D., J.T.N., K.N.F., A.R.S., and R.A.S. have no conflicts of interest to report. D.A.L. currently receives research support from Pfizer and Merck.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies the paper on the npj Schizophrenia website (10.1038/s41537-019-0081-0).
References
- 1.Dehmelt L, Halpain S. The MAP2/Tau family of microtubule-associated proteins. Genome Biol. 2004;6:204. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-6-1-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Caceres A, et al. Differential subcellular localization of tubulin and the microtubule-associated protein MAP2 in brain tissue as revealed by immunocytochemistry with monoclonal hybridoma antibodies. J. Neurosci. 1984;4:394–410. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-02-00394.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arnold SE, Lee VM, Gur RE, Trojanowski JQ. Abnormal expression of two microtubule-associated proteins (MAP2 and MAP5) in specific subfields of the hippocampal formation in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:10850–10854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosoklija G, Malaspina D, Sadiq S, Dwork AJ. Altered subicular MAP2 immunoreactivity in schizophrenia. Prilozi. 2006;26:13–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rioux L, Ruscheinsky D, Arnold SE. Microtubule-associated protein MAP2 expression in olfactory bulb in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2004;128:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jones LB, Johnson N, Byne W. Alterations in MAP2 immunocytochemistry in areas 9 and 32 of schizophrenic prefrontal cortex. Psychiatry Res. 2002;114:137–148. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00022-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shelton MA, et al. Loss of microtubule-associated protein 2 immunoreactivity linked to dendritic spine loss in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2015;78:374–385. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McKinney BC, et al. Density of small dendritic spines and microtubule-associated-protein-2 immunoreactivity in the primary auditory cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:1055–1061. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0350-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Law AJ, Weickert CS, Hyde TM, Kleinman JE, Harrison PJ. Reduced spinophilin but not microtubule-associated protein 2 expression in the hippocampal formation in schizophrenia and mood disorders: Molecular evidence for a pathology of dendritic spines. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2004;161:1848–1855. doi: 10.1176/ajp.161.10.1848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arion D, et al. Distinctive transcriptome alterations of prefrontal pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Mol. Psychiatry. 2015;20:1397–1405. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fromer M, et al. De novo mutations in schizophrenia implicate synaptic networks. Nature. 2014;506:179–184. doi: 10.1038/nature12929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hall J, Trent S, Thomas KL, O’Donovan MC, Owen MJ. Genetic risk for schizophrenia: convergence on synaptic pathways involved in plasticity. Biol. Psychiatry. 2015;77:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marchisella F, Coffey ET, Hollos P. Microtubule and microtubule associated protein anomalies in psychiatric disease. Cytoskeleton. 2016;73:596–611. doi: 10.1002/cm.21300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Curtis CE, D’Esposito M. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003;7:415–423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00197-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gottlieb J. From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron. 2007;53:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barch DM, et al. Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naive patients with schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2001;58:280. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.3.280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manoach DS, et al. Schizophrenic subjects show aberrant fMRI activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia during working memory performance. Biol. Psychiatry. 2000;48:99–109. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00227-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Potkin SG, et al. Working memory and DLPFC inefficiency in schizophrenia: the FBIRN study. Schizophr. Bull. 2009;35:19–31. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kühn J, Meissner C, Oehmichen M. Microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2)—a promising approach to diagnosis of forensic types of hypoxia-ischemia. Acta Neuropathol. 2005;110:579–586. doi: 10.1007/s00401-005-1090-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Akulinin VA, Dahlstrom A. Quantitative analysis of MAP2 immunoreactivity in human neocortex of three patients surviving after brain ischemia. Neurochem. Res. 2003;28:373–378. doi: 10.1023/A:1022401922669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Somenarain L, Jones LB. A comparative study of MAP2 immunostaining in areas 9 and 17 in schizophrenia and Huntington chorea. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2010;44:694–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Halim ND, et al. Increased lactate levels and reduced pH in postmortem brains of schizophrenics: medication confounds. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2008;169:208–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.D’Andrea MR, Howanski RJ, Saller CF. MAP2 IHC detection: a marker of antigenicity in CNS tissues. Biotech. Histochem. 2017;92:363–373. doi: 10.1080/10520295.2017.1295169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pakkenberg B. Total nerve cell number in neocortex in chronic schizophrenics and controls estimated using optical disectors. Biol. Psychiatry. 1993;34:768–772. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90065-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dorph-Petersen KA, et al. Pyramidal neuron number in layer 3 of primary auditory cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. Brain Res. 2009;1285:42–57. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dorph‐Petersen KA, Pierri JN, Wu Q, Sampson AR, Lewis DA. Primary visual cortex volume and total neuron number are reduced in schizophrenia. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007;501:290–301. doi: 10.1002/cne.21243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Behan ÁT, Byrne C, Dunn MJ, Cagney G, Cotter DR. Proteomic analysis of membrane microdomain-associated proteins in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder reveals alterations in LAMP, STXBP1 and BASP1 protein expression. Mol. Psychiatry. 2009;14:601–613. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.English JA, Dicker P, Föcking M, Dunn MJ, Cotter DR. 2-D DIGE analysis implicates cytoskeletal abnormalities in psychiatric disease. Proteomics. 2009;9:3368–3382. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hakak Y, et al. Genome-wide expression analysis reveals dysregulation of myelination-related genes in chronic schizophrenia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:4746–4751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081071198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clark D, Dedova I, Cordwell S, Matsumoto I. A proteome analysis of the anterior cingulate cortex gray matter in schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry. 2006;11:459–470. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clark D, Dedova I, Cordwell S, Matsumoto I. Altered proteins of the anterior cingulate cortex white matter proteome in schizophrenia. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2007;1:157–166. doi: 10.1002/prca.200600541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Föcking M, et al. Common proteomic changes in the hippocampus in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and particular evidence for involvement of cornu ammonis regions 2 and 3. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2011;68:477–488. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nesvaderani M, Matsumoto I, Sivagnanasundaram S. Anterior hippocampus in schizophrenia pathogenesis: molecular evidence from a proteome study. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry. 2009;43:310–322. doi: 10.1080/00048670902721103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sánchez C, Díaz-Nido J, Avila J. Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) and its relevance for the regulation of the neuronal cytoskeleton function. Prog. Neurobiol. 2000;61:133–168. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00046-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Garver M, et al. Altered MAP2 phosphorylation and dendritic spine density in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2017;81:S3–S4. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gusev A, et al. Transcriptome-wide association study of schizophrenia and chromatin activity yields mechanistic disease insights. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:538–548. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0092-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Purcell SM, et al. A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia. Nature. 2014;506:185–190. doi: 10.1038/nature12975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Salvoro C., Bortoluzzi S., Coppe A., Valle G., Feltrin E., Mostacciuolo M. L., Vazza G. Rare Risk Variants Identification by Identity-by-Descent Mapping and Whole-Exome Sequencing Implicates Neuronal Development Pathways in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Molecular Neurobiology. 2018;55(9):7366–7376. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-0922-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoshi M, et al. Mitogen-activated-protein-kinase-catalysed phosphorylation of microtubule-associated proteins, microtubule-associated protein 2 and microtubule-associated protein 4, induces and alteration in their function. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992;203:43–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb19825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Davare MA, Dong F, Charles S, Hell JW, Rubin CS. The A-kinase anchor protein MAP2B and cAMP-dependent protein kinase are associated with class C L-type calcium channels in neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:30280–30287. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.42.30280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Halpain S, Greengard P. Activation of NMDA receptors induces rapid dephosphorylation of the cytoskeletal protein MAP2. Neuron. 1990;5:237–246. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Quinlan EM, Halpain S. Postsynaptic mechanisms for bidirectional control of MAP2 phosphorylation by glutamate receptors. Neuron. 1996;16:357–368. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80053-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Quinlan EM, Halpain S. Emergence of activity-dependent, bidirectional control of microtubule-associated protein MAP2 phosphorylation during postnatal development. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:7627–7637. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-23-07627.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brugg B, Matus A. Phosphorylation determines the binding of microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP2) to microtubules in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 1991;114:735–743. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Murthy ASN, Falvin M. Microtubule assembly using the microtubule‐associated protein MAP‐2 prepared in defined states of phosphorylation with protein kinase and phosphatase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983;137:37–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Solís-Chagoyán H, et al. Microtubule organization and L-type voltage-activated calcium current in olfactory neuronal cells obtained from patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophr. Res. 2013;143:384–389. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gu J, Firestein BL, Zheng JQ. Microtubules in dendritic spine development. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:12120–12124. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2509-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hu X, Viesselmann C, Nam S, Merriam E, Dent EW. Activity-dependent dynamic microtubule invasion of dendritic spines. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:13094–13105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3074-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jaworski J, et al. Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2009;61:85–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kapitein LC, et al. NMDA receptor activation suppresses microtubule growth and spine entry. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:8194–8209. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6215-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shirao T, González-Billault C. Actin filaments and microtubules in dendritic spines. J. Neurochem. 2013;126:155–164. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Glantz LA, Lewis DA. Decreased dendritic spine density on prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2000;57:65. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rosoklija G, et al. Structural abnormalities of subicular dendrites in subjects with schizophrenia and mood disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2000;57:349. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.4.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fleming K, et al. Visuospatial working memory in patients with schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 1997;41:43–49. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00263-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Keefe RSE, Lees-Roitman SE, Dupre RL. Performance of patients with schizophrenia on a pen and paper visuospatial working memory task with short delay. Schizophr. Res. 1997;26:9–14. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(97)00037-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fontaine-Lenoir V, Fellous A, Duchossoy Y, Baulieu E, Robel P. Microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) is a neurosteroid receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:4711–4716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600113103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harada A, Teng J, Takei Y, Oguchi K, Hirokawa N. MAP2 is required for dendrite elongation, PKA anchoring in dendrites, and proper PKA signal transduction. J. Cell Biol. 2002;158:541–549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200110134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Poplawski GHD, et al. L1CAM increases MAP2 expression via the MAPK pathway to promote neurite outgrowth. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2012;50:169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sharma N, Kress Y, Shafit‐Zagardo B. Antisense MAP-2 oligonucleotides induce changes in microtubule assembly and neuritic elongation in pre‐existing neurites of rat cortical neurons. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 1994;27:234–247. doi: 10.1002/cm.970270305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Teng J, et al. Synergistic effects of MAP2 and MAP1B knockout in neuronal migration, dendritic outgrowth, and microtubule organization. J. Cell Biol. 2001;155:65–76. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200106025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sweet RA, Henteleff RA, Zhang W, Sampson AR, Lewis DA. Reduced dendritic spine density in auditory cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:374–389. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Anderson SA, Volk DW, Lewis DA. Increased density of microtubule associated protein 2-immunoreactive neurons in the prefrontal white matter of schizophrenic subjects. Schizophr. Res. 1996;19:111–119. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(96)88521-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kaufmann WE, Taylor CV, Lishaa NA. Immunoblotting patterns of cytoskeletal dendritic protein expression in human neocortex. Mol. Chem. Neuropathol. 1997;31:235–244. doi: 10.1007/BF02815127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Balaram P, Young NA, Kaas JH. Histological features of layers and sublayers in cortical visual areas V1 and V2 of chimpanzees, macaque monkeys, and humans. Eye Brain. 2014;2014:5–18. doi: 10.2147/EB.S51814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.