Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2019 Aug 26;7:e7598. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7598

Transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation on egg size, fertilization, hatching and larval size of sea urchins Strongylocentrotus intermedius

Jingyun Ding 1,#, Lingling Zhang 1,#, Jiangnan Sun 1, Dongtao Shi 1, Xiaomei Chi 1, Mingfang Yang 1, Yaqing Chang 1, Chong Zhao 1,
Editor: Anastazia Banaszak
PMCID: PMC6714959  PMID: 31523520

Abstract

Transgenerational effects are important for phenotypic plasticity and adaptation of marine invertebrates in the changing ocean. Ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation is an increasing threat to marine invertebrates. For the first time, we reported positive and negative transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation on egg size, fertilization, hatchability and larval size of a marine invertebrate. Strongylocentrotus intermedius exposed to UV-B radiation showed positive transgenerational effects and adaptation on egg size, hatching rate and post-oral arm length of larvae. Negative transgenerational effects were found in body length, stomach length and stomach width of larvae whose parents were exposed to UV-B radiation. Sires probably play important roles in transgenerational effects of UV-B. The present study provides valuable information into transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation on fitness related traits of sea urchins (at least Strongylocentrotus intermedius).

Keywords: UV-B, Transgenerational effect, Strongylocentrotus intermedius, Adaptation

Introduction

Marine invertebrates have complex life cycles alternating between the short-lived embryonic and larval stages and the long-lived adult stage. The performance in a life history stage can lead to significant positive or negative carryover effects on subsequent life history stages, also known as the developmental domino phenomena (Byrne, 2012). Carryover effects can arise within a generation, for example, embryonic and larval experiences can affect the success of juveniles and adults; as well as across a generation (transgenerational effects), with phenotypic changes in offspring in response to the environmental stress experienced by one or both parents (Kovalchuk, 2012; Shama & Wegner, 2014; Munday, 2014). Transgenerational effects of a few environmental factors have been investigated in marine invertebrates, including salinity (Davis, 1958), heavy metals (Untersee & Pechenik, 2007), and temperature (Byrne, 2011).

To our knowledge, however, it remains unknown on whether transgenerational effects of solar ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280–315 nm) radiation exist in marine invertebrates, in spite of its ecological importance. UV-B becomes an increasing threat to marine invertebrates, because of the anthropogenic gases induced ozone depletion (Day & Neale, 2002; Manney et al., 2011). At least 10% UV-B can penetrate to seawater to a depth of 16 m (Tedetti & Sempéré, 2006), highlighting the possible impacts to marine invertebrates in intertidal and shallow water. Most studies focused on real-time effects of UV-B of marine organisms (Lamare, Burritt & Lister, 2011). UV-B radiation probably brings about long-term and transgenerational carryover effects on the fitness of marine invertebrates (Zhao et al., 2018a), because UV-B causes cellular damage by oxidizing proteins, DNA and membrane lipids cannot immediately recover or even irreversible (Adams & Shick, 2001).

Sea urchins are a group of ecologically important marine invertebrates in structuring marine benthic communities, both as grazers and prey (Pearse, 2006). Species inhabit intertidal and shallow waters are vulnerable to UV-B radiation, although primary avoidance and protection strategies provide them with the ultimate safeguard against UV-B (Lamare, Burritt & Lister, 2011), including behavioral responses (e.g., covering behavior) (Sigg, Lloyd-Knight & Boal, 2007), photoprotectants (e.g., mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs)), DNA repair mechanisms (e.g., photoreactivation). DNA dimers (Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts) formation is a key DNA damage to UVR exposure in eggs, embryos and larvae of sea urchins (Ravanat, Douki & Cadet, 2001; Lamare, Burritt & Lister, 2011). This probably results in fertilization interference, delayed development (Lamare, Burritt & Lister, 2011), impaired skeletal formation (Bonaventura et al., 2005; Nahon et al., 2009) and apoptosis (Lesser, Kruse & Barry, 2003). The sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius, a representative keystone ecosystem engineer in intertidal and shallow seas around Japan, Korea, northeastern China and Far East Russia (Agatsuma, 2013), are sensitive and susceptible to UV-B radiation (Zhao et al., 2018a) through their entire biological development, including gametes, fertilization and embryonic and larval development (Lamare, Burritt & Lister, 2011). It is especially essential to consider of the annual dose of UV-B radiation around the areas, where Strongylocentrotus intermedius exist. This was ~6 MJ/(m2 ∙ yr) (~18.9 μW ∙ cm−2) at Tokyo (Bais et al., 2015). Although the data of UV-B radiation was observed by land-based spectroradiometers. Recently, short-term (1 h) UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2) showed significantly adverse effects on survival, food consumption, test diameter, test height, test height:test diameter, gonad weight and crude protein of gonads of Strongylocentrotus intermedius, despite the absence of UV-B radiation for 8 weeks (Zhao et al., 2018a). Therefore, we hypothesized that transgenerational effects of short-term (1 h) UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2) exist in Strongylocentrotus intermedius (for example, egg size, fertilization, hatchability and larval size). The main aim of the present study is to test whether transgenerational effects short-term (1 h) UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2) exist in sea urchins (at least Strongylocentrotus intermedius). We asked that (1) whether UV-B radiations have significant transgenerational effects on egg size, fertilization, hatching and larval size of Strongylocentrotus intermedius, (2) whether the transgenerational effects are influenced by sires.

Methods

Sea urchins

The present study was an extension of our previous study (Zhao et al., 2018a). The source of sea urchins and experimental design were fully described in Zhao et al. (2018a) and briefly described as follows:

Strongylocentrotus intermedius (test diameter = 44.97 ± 1.23 mm) were transported from the hatchery of Dalian Haibao Fishery Company to the Key Laboratory of Mariculture and Stock Enhancement in North China’s Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs at Dalian Ocean University. The sea urchins were cultured in a tank (length × width × height: 180 × 100 × 80 cm) with aerated seawater until the experiment started. They were fed wild fresh Saccharina japonica and Ulva lactuca ad libitum under natural photoperiod (from 12 h light:12 h dark). The seawater was changed every 3 days.

Experimental design

Sea urchins were exposed to UV-B irradiance levels at zero and 20 μW ∙ cm−2 for 1 h using a UV-B lamp (280–315 nm, TL 40W/12 RS; Philips Co., Hamburg, Germany) (Shi et al., 2018). The intensity of UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2) were set by regulating the distance between UV-B lamp and the surface of the water (Adams, 2001).The control group was set as zero μW ∙ cm−2. The UV-B exposures were carried out in an isolated box with no environmental UV-B radiation involved. Strongylocentrotus intermedius were placed into randomly distributed cages (length × width × height: 75 × 43 × 43 cm) in a tank (one ton in volume) after each UV-B radiation (zero and 20 μW ∙ cm−2). All sea urchins were cultured in aerated seawater with almost no UV-B radiation from solar radiation (zero μW ∙ cm−2) in a room for 10 months until the breeding experiment started, only except for several days with very little UV-B radiation (0–0.5 μW ∙ cm−2) (Shi et al., 2018). They were fed wild fresh Saccharina japonica and U. lactuca ad libitum under natural photoperiod (from 12 h light:12 h dark) at the laboratory during the 10 months after the UV-B radiation (zero and 20 μW ∙ cm−2). The seawater was changed every 3 days.

Breeding experiments were carried out on June 9, 2017. Three mating groups were set as follows: group A (♀0 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), group B (♀20 × ♂20 μW · cm−2) and group C (♀20 × ♂0 μW · cm−2). Three families were produced for each mating group (N = 3).

Spawning, fertilization, hatching and larval culture were followed our previous study (Zhao et al., 2018b), which were briefly described as follows:

Spawning was induced by the injection of one mL KCl (0.5M) into the coelom via the peristomial membrane. Eggs were collected in filtered seawater and sperm were collected dry. Spawning time was limited to 30 min to ensure gamete quality. The same amount of eggs was collected in each bottle. Collected eggs were filtered and transferred to 3 L bottles at the appropriate temperatures using a fine silk net (mesh size: 106 μm). According to the mating design, 500 mL of egg suspension (~0.1 million eggs) were collected from the well mixed seawater in the 3 L bottle and fully mixed with ~50 μL dry sperm for fertilization. According to the method of Suckling et al. (2015), our preliminary experiment indicated that this egg: sperm ratio is optimal for the fertilization of Strongylocentrotus intermedius. The egg:sperm ratio was kept approximately the same across the experiment, although sperm concentration was not calculated. The breeding experiments described above were exactly repeated using different dams and sires three times in each mating group.

Fertilized eggs were transferred into nine separated cylindrical cages (226 cm2 × 8 cm, ~5 L). The embryo density was ~20 ind · mL−1. After measurement of fertilization and hatchability, we collected hatched blastulae in the upper 3/4 of the seawater with dead and unhatched blastulae removed. Larvae were cultured in nine containers of ~10 L (bottom diameter: 23 cm, height: 24 cm) with the density of ~0.5 ind · mL−1. Larvae in all tanks were fed with the microalga Chaetoceros gracilis three times a day in the weakly aerated seawater.

Egg diameter

Egg diameter was measured before fertilization using a microscope (DS-Ri1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan). A total of 30 eggs (10 eggs for each family) were measured for mating groups A (♀0 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), B (♀20 × ♂20 μW · cm−2) and C (♀20 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), respectively.

Fertilization and hatching rates

Fertilization and hatching rates were measured 4 and 27 h after fertilization using a microscope (DS-Ri1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan). The methods of measurement and calculation were according to our previous study (Zhao et al., 2018b), which are summarized as follows:

F(%)=xy×100

where F = fertilization rate, x = number of embryos in cleavage and y = total number of embryos and eggs.

H(%)=xy×100

where H = hatching rate, x = number of prism larvae and y = total number of larvae and embryos.

Larval size

Larval size was measured 5 days after fertilization, according to our previous study (Zhao et al., 2018b). We measured larval length, larval width, stomach length, stomach width, post-oral arm length and body rod length of sea urchins (50 larvae for each family) using a microscope (DS-Ri1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Conceptual diagram of larval size measurements.

Figure 1

Letters a, b, c, d, e and f refer to larval length, larval width, stomach length, stomach width, postoral arm length and body rod length, respectively.

Statistical analysis

All data were tested for normal distribution and homogeneity of variance before statistical analysis. Egg size, larval length, stomach length, body rod length and post-oral arm length were analyzed using nested univariate ANOVA. LSD’s multiple comparisons were carried out when significant difference was found in nested univariate ANOVA. Fertilization, hatching rate were analyzed using one-way ANOVA after a square root of arcsine transformation. LSD’s multiple comparisons were carried out when significant difference was found in the one-way ANOVA. One-way Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA was used to analyze larval width, stomach width and post-oral arm length/body rod length, because of the non-normal distribution and/or heterogeneity of variance of the data. Pairwise multiple comparisons were followed using Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc method when significant difference was found in the one-way Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. All data are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). All analyses were done with SPSS 21.0 statistical software. A probability level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Egg diameter

No significant difference was found among families (P = 0.055). Eggs used for mating group C (94.24 ± 2.63 μm) was significantly larger than those for mating designs A (89.61 ± 3.05 μm) and B (91.34 ± 1.88 μm) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 2). In addition, egg diameter of group B was significantly larger than that of group A (P = 0.008, Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Egg diameter of Strongylocentrotus intermedius used for mating groups A (♀0 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), B (♀20 × ♂20 μW · cm−2) and C (♀20 × ♂0 μW · cm−2).

Figure 2

Different letters above the bars represent significant difference (P < 0.05) among experimental groups.

Fertilization and hatching rates

There was no significant difference of fertilization rates among the mating groups (P = 0.112, Fig. 3A). On average, fertilization rates were over 90% in all groups (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3. Fertilization rates (A) and hatching rates (B) of Strongylocentrotus intermedius in mating groups A (♀0 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), B (♀20 × ♂20 μW · cm−2) and C (♀20 × ♂0 μW · cm−2).

Figure 3

No significant difference (P < 0.05) was found among experimental groups in (A). Different letters above the bars represent significant difference (P < 0.05) among experimental groups in (B).

The hatching rate of group C (91.33% ± 2.08%) was significantly higher than those of groups A (79.33% ± 0.58%) and B (86.33% ± 0.58%) (P < 0.001, P = 0.004). In addition, hatching rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P = 0.002, Fig. 3B).

Larval length and width

Significant difference in larval length was found among families (P < 0.001). The Strongylocentrotus intermedius of group B (381.87 ± 25.94 μm) showed significantly shorter larval length than groups A (392.06 ± 27.70 μm) and C (395.42 ± 22.39 μm) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 4A). However, there was no significant difference of larval length between groups A and C (P = 0.229, Fig. 4A)

Figure 4. Larval length (A) and width (B) of Strongylocentrotus intermedius in mating groups A (♀0 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), B (♀20 × ♂20 μW · cm−2) and C (♀20 × ♂0 μW · cm−2).

Figure 4

Different letters above the bars represent significant difference (P < 0.05) among experimental groups.

Larval width of group C (175.22 ± 13.61 μm) was significantly greater than those of groups A (167.29 ± 12.11 μm) and B (166.80 ± 9.84 μm) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 4B). However, there was no significant difference of larval width between groups A and B (P = 1.000, Fig. 4B).

Stomach length and width

Significant difference was found in stomach width among families (P < 0.001). Stomach length of group B (78.33 ± 11.55 μm) was significantly shortest among the groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 5A). In addition, group A (87.47 ± 11.86 μm) showed significantly larger stomach length than group C (83.76 ± 10.67 μm) (P = 0.005, Fig. 5A).

Figure 5. Stomach length (A) and width (B) of Strongylocentrotus intermedius larvae in mating groups A (♀0 × ♂0 μW · cm−2), B (♀20 × ♂20 μW · cm−2) and C (♀20 × ♂0 μW · cm−2).

Figure 5

Different letters above the bars represent significant difference (P < 0.05) among experimental groups.

Group B (58.97 ± 10.45 μm) also had significantly shortest stomach width among the groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 5B). However, there was no significant difference of stomach width between groups A (66.52 ± 13.21 μm) and C (63.71 ± 10.31 μm) (P = 0.268, Fig. 5B).

Post-oral arm length, body rod length and post-oral arm length/body rod length

Significant differences was found in post-oral arm length and body rod length among families (P < 0.001, P = 0.003). Post-oral arm length was significantly shortest in group A (89.13 ± 15.23 μm) than in groups B (95.16 ± 16.61 μm) and C (104.35 ± 17.71 μm) (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 6A). Body rod length of group A (312.19 ± 25.19 μm), however, was significantly greater than those of groups B (298.61 ± 23.66 μm) and C (305.31 ± 25.31 μm) (P < 0.001, P = 0.015, Fig. 6B). Consistently, group A (0.29 ± 0.06) showed significantly lowest post-oral arm length/body rod length among the experimental groups (group B: 0.32 ± 0.06, group C: 0.34 ± 0.07) (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, Fig. 6C).

Figure 6. Body rod length (A), post-oral arm length (B) and body rod length/post-oral arm length (C) of Strongylocentrotus intermedius larvae among mating groups.

Figure 6

Different letters above the bars represent significant difference (P < 0.05) among experimental groups.

Discussion

Ultraviolet-B radiation is an increasing threat to marine invertebrates in shallow waters (Day & Neale, 2002; Manney et al., 2011). However, current information is limited in the real-time effects on behaviors (Sigg, Lloyd-Knight & Boal, 2007), cellular responses (Lu & Wu, 2005), DNA damage (Mitchell, Adams-Deutsch & Olson, 2009), reproduction (Kane & Pomory, 2001) and development (Bonaventura et al., 2006) of marine organisms. Transgenerational effects are therefore essential for the full understanding of phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary adaptation of marine invertebrates in the changing ocean (Ross, Parker & Byrne, 2016). For the first time, we reported both positive and negative transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation on egg size, fertilization, hatchability and larval size in sea urchins.

In the present study, sea urchins exposed to short-term (1 h) UV-B radiation (20 μW · cm−2) spawned significantly larger eggs than those not exposed. Lamare et al. (2006) reported that the effects of UV-B radiation on different populations of sea urchins vary with latitudes both within and between species. Egg size was significantly different between geographic populations of the Echinometra sea urchins (McAlister & Moran, 2012). Thus, UV-B radiation is probably involved in the population difference of egg size, although it was not measured at the collection sites (McAlister & Moran, 2012). The sea urchin Heliocidaris tuberculata spawns small eggs and has feeding larvae, while H. erythrogramma spawns large eggs and has non-feeding larvae (Byrne et al., 1999; Foo, Deaker & Byrne, 2018), suggesting that larger eggs are more suitable for the consequent limited food conditions (Emlet & Hoegh-Guldberg, 1997). In the present study, the larger eggs are consistent with significantly less food consumption of Strongylocentrotus intermedius exposed to UV-B radiation (Zhao et al., 2018a). We hypothesize that transgenerational adaptation and/or acclimation occurs on increasing egg size to adapt the condition of limited food consumption. Further studies are definitely essential to test this hypothesis.

Ultraviolet-B radiation did not transgenerationally affect the fertilization of Strongylocentrotus intermedius. This is consistent with our previous finding that long-term elevated temperature showed no transgenerational effect on fertilization of Strongylocentrotus intermedius (Zhao et al., 2018b). Together with the previous study, the present result indicates the robustness of fertilization, in despite of their parents are exposed to adverse environments.

Ultraviolet-B radiation significantly reduced the hatchability of the copepod Paracyclopina nana (Won et al., 2014). However, significantly higher hatching rates were found in the groups exposed to UV-B radiation. The increased hatching rate probably resulted from the relatively short radiation duration (1 h) and long-term recovery (10 months) in the present study. The current result suggests a positive transgenerational effect of UV-B radiation on the fitness of sea urchins. The trend of hatching rates was well consistent with that of egg diameter. The larger eggs and the greater region of cells at the core that receives little or no UV are in accordance with the greater proportion of unexposed DNA and the lower CPD load per unit DNA (Browman et al., 2003) Besides, UV-B radiation probably keeps microbial infection of eggs at a low level (Skresleta et al., 2005; Hansen & Olafsen, 1989), thereby leading to improved embryo survival (Skresleta et al., 2005; Hansen & Olafsen, 1989). This probably promoted the consequently increasing hatchability of sea urchins. The increasing of egg size and consequent hatchability clearly indicates of the adaptation to UV-B radiation in sea urchins.

Strongylocentrotus intermedius, whose parents were both exposed to short-term UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2), showed significantly shortest larval length and width. Although carotenoids in Saccharina japonica as a powerful antioxidant that helps animals to minimize oxidative damage (Matsuno & Tsushima, 2001), a negative transgenerational effect of UV-B radiation on larval size of Strongylocentrotus intermedius occurs. This enriches our previous findings that UV-B radiation at 20 μW ∙ cm−2 is dangerous to marine invertebrates (at least Strongylocentrotus intermedius) (Zhao et al., 2018a). Interestingly, larval length was not significantly reduced in the sea urchins of group C, whose dams were exposed to UV-B radiation while sires were not. Further, larval width was significantly largest in sea urchins of group C. Carroll & Shick (1996) noted that MAAs, the most important group of photoprotective pigments in larval stage of echinoderms, which is endowed to the eggs maternally. In the sea urchin Sterechinus neumayeri, the greatest MAAs concentrations were found in the ovaries (Karentz, Dunlap & Bosch, 1997; McClintock & Karentz, 1997). UV-induced negative effects in the offspring of sea urchins was clearly correlated with the absence of MAAs (Häder et al., 2007). Our results showed group B with the shortest body size while larval size of group C without adverse effects. This suggests that MAAs of dams is more robustness than that of sires under UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2). Although dams can provide a normal amount of MAAs, the amount provided by the sires is too less. Thus, the offspring larvae don’t have sufficient concentrations of MAAs to maintain their normal individual development, resulting in smaller larval size in group B.

Stomach size is important for larval development and growth (Chang et al., 2004). Sea urchins whose both parents were exposed to short-term UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2) showed significantly shortest stomach length and width. This result is well consistent with the reduced larval size in the present study, indicating a negative transgenerational effect of UV-B radiation on the stomach size. Stomach width was not significantly reduced in the sea urchins of group C, although stomach length was significantly impacted. This result confirms the conclusion that sires may play an essential role in transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation of sea urchins.

Phenotypic plasticity has important ecological and evolutionary implications on early developmental stages of marine invertebrates to address temporal changes in abiotic environmental conditions (McAlister & Miner, 2018). In this sense, food limitation induces longer post-oral arm length, both absolutely and relative to body rod length (Adams et al., 2011; McAlister & Miner, 2018). Because in order to avoid UV-B radiation, covering and shading behaviors of sea urchins may reduce movement and hence the ability of feeding (Kehas, Theoharides & Gilbert, 2005; Dumont et al., 2007; Burnaford & Vasquez, 2008). In the present study, post-oral arm length/body rod length significantly increased in larvae whose parents were exposed to short-term UV-B radiation, indicating a positive transgenerational effect. This result is well consistent with the hypothesis that the larger arms are an adaptation matched to the less food consumption of their parents. Consistently, elevated temperature transgenerationally increased post-oral arm length/body rod length in Strongylocentrotus intermedius, whose parents also fed significantly less (Zhao et al., 2018a). Further, as to the proximate mechanisms causing the observed effects, Pahkala, Laurila & Merila (2001) pointed that a trade-offs between energy distributions among different functions in vivo could be involved in carry-over effects of UV-B radiation on larval fitness in Rana temporaria. Thus, we suspect a trade-off between the energy allocated to foraging behavior and that allocated to cellular UV-B damage repair could be involved. Thus, it’s possible that the increased post-oral arm length/body rod length helps Strongylocentrotus intermedius get food around with as little displacement as possible, helping them save energy for UV-B damage repair in vivo. In addition, significant family differences were found in larval length, stomach width, post-oral arm length and body rod length (with the exception of egg diameter). This is consistent with the finding that larval growth of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius including larval size, stomach size, post-oral arm length and body rod length was significantly influenced by the degree of inbreeding of the families (Zhao et al., 2016).

In conclusion, Strongylocentrotus intermedius exposed to short-term (1 h) UV-B radiation (20 μW ∙ cm−2) showed positive transgenerational effects and adaptation on egg size, hatching rate and post-oral arm length of larvae. Negative transgenerational effects were found in body length, stomach length and stomach width of larvae whose parents were exposed to UV-B radiation. Sires probably play essential roles in transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation. The present study provides valuable information into transgenerational effects of UV-B radiation on fitness related traits of sea urchins (at least Strongylocentrotus intermedius).

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Egg size.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Fertilization and hatchability.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Gonad developmental stage.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Larval size.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-4

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. John Lawrence for academic and editorial suggestions.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41506177), the Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, China P. R. (2017-1B05), and the Doctor Start-up Fund for Chong Zhao (HDBS201706). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jingyun Ding performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lingling Zhang performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jiangnan Sun performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Dongtao Shi performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Xiaomei Chi performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Mingfang Yang performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Yaqing Chang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Chong Zhao conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Adams (2001).Adams NL. UV radiation evokes negative phototaxis and covering behavior in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2001;213:87–95. doi: 10.3354/meps213087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Adams et al. (2011).Adams DK, Sewell MA, Angerer RC, Angerer LM. Rapid adaptation to food availability by a dopamine-mediated morphogenetic response. Nature Communications. 2011;2(1):592. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Adams & Shick (2001).Adams NL, Shick JM. Mycosporine-like amino acids prevent UVB-induced abnormalities during early development of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Marine Biology. 2001;138(2):267–280. doi: 10.1007/s002270000463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Agatsuma (2013).Agatsuma Y. Strongylocentrotus intermedius. In: Lawrence JM, editor. Sea Urchins: Biology and Ecology. Third Edition. San Diego: Academic Press; 2013. pp. 437–447. [Google Scholar]
  • Bais et al. (2015).Bais AF, McKenzie RL, Bernhard G, Aucamp PJ, Ilyas M, Madronich S, Tourpali K. Ozone depletion and climate change: impacts on UV radiation. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2015;14(1):19–52. doi: 10.1039/C4PP90032D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonaventura et al. (2005).Bonaventura R, Poma V, Costa C, Matranga V. UVB radiation prevents skeleton growth and stimulates the expression of stress markers in sea urchin embryos. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;328(1):150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonaventura et al. (2006).Bonaventura R, Poma V, Russo R, Zito F, Matranga V. Effects of UV-B radiation on development and hsp70 expression in sea urchin cleavage embryos. Marine Biology. 2006;149(1):79–86. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-0213-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Browman et al. (2003).Browman HI, Vetter RD, Rodriguezy CA, Cullen JJ, Davis RF, Lynn E, Pierre1 JFS. Ultraviolet (280–400 nm)–induced DNA damage in the eggs and larvae of Calanus finmarchicus G. (Copepoda) and Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2003;77(4):397–404. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2003)077<0397:unddit>2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Burnaford & Vasquez (2008).Burnaford JL, Vasquez M. Solar radiation plays a role in habitat selection by the sea star Pisaster ochraceus. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2008;368:177–187. doi: 10.3354/meps07598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Byrne (2011).Byrne M. Impact of ocean warming and ocean acidification on marine invertebrate life history stages: vulnerabilities and potential for persistence in a changing ocean. In: Gibson RN, Atkinson RJA, Gordon JDM, editors. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Reviews. Vol. 49. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Byrne (2012).Byrne M. Global change ecotoxicology: identification of early life history bottlenecks in marine invertebrates, variable species responses and variable experimental approaches. Marine Environmental Research. 2012;76:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Byrne et al. (1999).Byrne M, Villinski JT, Cisternas P, Siegel RK, Popodi E, Raff RA. Maternal factors and the evolution of developmental mode: evolution of oogenesis in Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Development Genes and Evolution. 1999;209(5):275–283. doi: 10.1007/s004270050253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carroll & Shick (1996).Carroll AK, Shick JM. Dietary accumulation of UV-absorbing mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) by the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) Marine Biology. 1996;124(4):561–569. doi: 10.1007/BF00351037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang et al. (2004).Chang Y, Ding J, Song J, Yang W. Biology and aquaculture of sea cucumbers and sea urchins. Beijing: Ocean Press; 2004. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis (1958).Davis HC. Survival and growth of clam and oyster larvae at different salinities. Biological Bulletin. 1958;114(3):296–307. doi: 10.2307/1538986. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Day & Neale (2002).Day TA, Neale PJ. Effects of UV-B radiation on terrestrial and aquatic primary producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 2002;33(1):371–396. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumont et al. (2007).Dumont CP, Drolet D, Deschênes I, Himmelman JH. Multiple factors explain the covering behaviour in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Animal Behavior. 2007;73(6):979–986. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Emlet & Hoegh-Guldberg (1997).Emlet RB, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Effects of egg size on postlarval performance: experimental evidence from a sea urchin. Evolution. 1997;51(1):141–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02395.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Foo, Deaker & Byrne (2018).Foo SA, Deaker D, Byrne M. Cherchez la femme—impact of ocean acidification on the egg jelly coat and attractants for sperm. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2018;221(13):jeb177188. doi: 10.1242/jeb.177188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Häder et al. (2007).Häder DP, Kumar HD, Smithc RC, Worrestd RC. Effects of solar UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2007;6(3):267–285. doi: 10.1039/B700020K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen & Olafsen (1989).Hansen GH, Olafsen JA. Bacterial colonization of cod (Gadus morhua L.) and halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) eggs in marine aquaculture. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 1989;55(1):1435–1446. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.6.1435-1446.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kane & Pomory (2001).Kane K, Pomory CM. The effects of UV-B radiation on the reproduction and mortality of Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) Hydrobiologia. 2001;444(1/3):213–215. doi: 10.1023/A:1017566015050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Karentz, Dunlap & Bosch (1997).Karentz D, Dunlap WC, Bosch I. Temporal and spatial occurrence of UV-absorbing mycosporine-like amino acids in tissues of the Antarctic sea urchin Sterechinus neumayeri during springtime ozone-depletion. Marine Biology. 1997;129(2):343–353. doi: 10.1007/s002270050174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kehas, Theoharides & Gilbert (2005).Kehas AJ, Theoharides KA, Gilbert JJ. Effect of sunlight intensity and albinism on the covering response of the Caribbean sea urchin Tripneustes ventricosus. Marine Biology. 2005;146(6):1111–1117. doi: 10.1007/S00227-004-1514-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kovalchuk (2012).Kovalchuk I. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in animals. Frontiers of Genetics. 2012;3:76. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamare et al. (2006).Lamare MD, Barker MF, Lesser MP, Marshall C. DNA photorepair in echinoid embryos: effects of temperature on repair rate in Antarctic and non-Antarctic species. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2006;209(24):5017–5028. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamare, Burritt & Lister (2011).Lamare M, Burritt D, Lister K. Ultraviolet radiation and echinoderms: past, present and future perspectives. Advances in Marine Biology. 2011;59:145–187. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385536-7.00004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lesser, Kruse & Barry (2003).Lesser MP, Kruse VA, Barry TM. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation causes apoptosis in developing sea urchin embryos. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2003;206(22):4097–4103. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu & Wu (2005).Lu XY, Wu RSS. Ultraviolet damages sperm mitochondrial function and membrane integrity in the sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2005;61(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Manney et al. (2011).Manney GL, Santee ML, Rex M, Livesey NJ, Pitts MC, Veefkind P, Nash ER, Wohltmann I, Lehmann R, Froidevaux L, Poole LR, Schoeberl MR, Haffner DP, Davies J, Dorokhov V, Gernandt H, Johnson B, Kivi R, Kyrö E, Larsen N, Levelt PF, Makshtas A, McElroy CT, Nakajima H, Parrondo MC, Tarasick DW, Von Der Gathen P, Walker KA, Zinoviev NS. Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011. Nature. 2011;478(7370):469–475. doi: 10.1038/nature10556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsuno & Tsushima (2001).Matsuno T, Tsushima M. Carotenoids in sea urchins. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science. 2001;32:115–138. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9309(01)80009-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • McAlister & Miner (2018).McAlister JS, Miner BG. Phenotypic plasticity of feeding structures in marine invertebrate larvae. In: Carrier TJ, Reitzel AM, Heyland A, editors. Evolutionary Ecology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. pp. 103–123. [Google Scholar]
  • McAlister & Moran (2012).McAlister JS, Moran AL. Relationships among egg size, composition, and energy: a comparative study of geminate sea urchins. PLOS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McClintock & Karentz (1997).McClintock JB, Karentz D. Mycosporine-like amino acids in 38 species of subtidal marine organisms from McMurdo sound, Antarctica. Antarctic Science. 1997;9(4):392–398. doi: 10.1017/S0954102097000503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell, Adams-Deutsch & Olson (2009).Mitchell DL, Adams-Deutsch T, Olson MH. Dose dependence of DNA repair in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) larvae exposed to UV-B radiation. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences. 2009;8(1):75–81. doi: 10.1039/B807469K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Munday (2014).Munday PL. Transgenerational acclimation of fishes to climate change and ocean acidification. F1000 Prime Reports. 2014;6:99. doi: 10.12703/p6-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nahon et al. (2009).Nahon S, Castro Porras VA, Pruski AM, Charles F. Sensitivity to UV radiation in early life stages of the Mediterranean sea urchin Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck) Science of The Total Environment. 2009;407(6):1892–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pahkala, Laurila & Merila (2001).Pahkala M, Laurila A, Merila J. Carry–over effects of ultraviolet–B radiation on larval fitness in Rana temporaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2001;268(1477):1699–1706. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearse (2006).Pearse JS. Ecological role of purple sea urchins. Science. 2006;314(5801):940–941. doi: 10.1126/science.1131888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ravanat, Douki & Cadet (2001).Ravanat J-L, Douki T, Cadet J. Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2001;63(1–3):88–102. doi: 10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00206-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ross, Parker & Byrne (2016).Ross PM, Parker L, Byrne M. Transgenerational responses of molluscs and echinoderms to changing ocean conditions. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2016;73(3):537–549. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Shama & Wegner (2014).Shama LNS, Wegner KM. Grandparental effects in marine sticklebacks: transgenerational plasticity across multiple generations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2014;27(11):2297–2307. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi et al. (2018).Shi DT, Ding JY, Zhang LL, Zhang LS, Sun JN, Chang YQ, Zhao C. Effects of UV-B radiation on fitness related behaviors of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology. 2018;36(5):1681–1687. doi: 10.1007/s00343-018-7211-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sigg, Lloyd-Knight & Boal (2007).Sigg JE, Lloyd-Knight KM, Boal JG. U radiation influences covering behaviour in the urchin lytechinus variegatus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK. 2007;87(5):1257–1261. doi: 10.1017/S0025315407055865. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Skresleta et al. (2005).Skresleta S, Borjab A, Bugliaroc L, Hansend G, Meerkötterc R, Olsena K, Verdeboute J. Some effects of ultraviolet radiation and climate on the reproduction of Calanus finmarchicus (Copepoda) and year class formation in Arcto-Norwegian cod (Gadus morhua) ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2005;62(7):1293–1300. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.05.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Suckling et al. (2015).Suckling CC, Clark MS, Richard J, Morley SA, Thorne MAS, Harper EM, Peck LS. Adult acclimation to combined temperature and pH stressors significantly enhances reproductive outcomes compared to short-term exposures. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2015;84(3):773–784. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tedetti & Sempéré (2006).Tedetti M, Sempéré R. Penetration of ultraviolet radiation in the marine environment. A review. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2006;82(2):389–397. doi: 10.1562/2005-11-09-IR-733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Untersee & Pechenik (2007).Untersee S, Pechenik JA. Local adaptation and maternal effects in two species of marine gastropod (genus Crepidula) that differ in dispersal potential. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;347:79–85. doi: 10.3354/meps07063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Won et al. (2014).Won E, Lee Y, Han J, Hwang UK, Shin KH, Park HG, Lee JS. Effects of UV radiation on hatching, lipid peroxidation, and fatty acid composition in the copepod Paracyclopina nana. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C. 2014;165:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2016).Zhao C, Sun P, Wei J, Zhang LS, Zhang WJ, Song J, Chang YQ. Larval size and metamorphosis are significantly reduced in second generation of inbred sea urchins Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Aquaculture. 2016;452:402–406. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.11.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2018a).Zhao C, Zhang L, Shi D, Chi X, Yin D, Sun J, Ding J, Yang M, Chang Y. Carryover effects of short-term UV-B radiation on fitness related traits of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018a;164:659–664. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao et al. (2018b).Zhao C, Zhang L, Shi D, Ding J, Yin D, Sun J, Zhang B, Chang Y. Transgenerational effects of ocean warming on the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018b;151:212–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Egg size.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Fertilization and hatchability.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-2
Supplemental Information 3. Gonad developmental stage.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-3
Supplemental Information 4. Larval size.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7598/supp-4

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES