Introduction
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is an age-related neurodegenerative illness characterized by progressive memory loss, impairment of cognitive function, and the development of plaques of insoluble amyloid precursor protein fragments and neurofibrillary tangles of Tau protein[1] [2]. It is estimated that in 2018, 5.7 million people in the United States are living with Alzheimer’s, most of whom are ≥ 65 years old, with costs of care accumulating to $277 billion [3]. The prevailing hypothesis views the accumulation of the β–amyloid protein (Aβ) as a precipitating event in the pathogenesis of AD [4]. Increased Aβ production is thought to disrupt neuronal function and ultimately lead to cell death [5]. However, it is becoming increasingly evident that the etiology of Alzheimer’s Disease is more complex than previously appreciated [6]. Neuropathological studies have established excitatory synaptic loss as the best correlate of the pattern and severity of cognitive deficits observed in AD [7]; [8]; [9]. Furthermore, the loss of synapses in AD appears to be substantially greater than that predicted by the loss of neurons alone, and the onset of cognitive impairments and memory loss, the earliest clinical manifestations of AD, precede massive neuronal degeneration [10]. Taken together, we consider that synapse loss represents a key initial event in the onset of AD.
Current treatments for Alzheimer’s disease
Despite research advancements in recent years, there is no cure for AD and cholinesterase inhibitors and a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist are the only drugs that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat AD [6]. These drugs treat only the symptoms of AD, not the underlying pathology, and show modest efficacy [11]; [12]. There currently a number of compounds in clinical trials to treat AD, many of which are anti-Aβ or anti-Tau therapies [6]. Since strategies to treat AD, such as lowering Aβ, have performed only modestly in recent clinical trials, the identification of alternate targets that are independent of amyloid load is critical for progress in the development of AD therapeutics. Such approaches may work independently to treat AD or in conjunction with current Aβ therapies. This alternative view is evident, as compounds entering clinical trials show less bias towards anti-tau and anti-amyloid therapies, and NIH funding for amyloid based therapies decreased from 27% in 2008 to 18% in 2017 [6].
Ephexin5 in AD
Recent progress in the Alzheimer’s field has revealed a promising drug target, Ephexin5 (Arhgef15), that acts to restrict excitatory synapse development. Ephexin5, a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) that activates the small G-protein RhoA, is present at the excitatory synapse in developing neurons [13]; [14]. Post development, Ephexin5 is rapidly phosphorylated by the Ephrin B receptor tyrosine kinase B2, EphB2, and is then targeted for proteasome-dependent degradation by the E3 ubiquitin ligase, UBE3A. Subsequently, Ephexin5 protein levels remain low into adulthood [13]. It has been demonstrated that EphB2 signaling is downregulated in the J20 mouse model of AD, and over-expression of EphB2 rescues the defects seen in the same model [15]. This suggests that a better understanding of the role of EphB2 signaling in synapse development may offer new possibilities for treating AD.
It was previously found that Ephexin5 expression is activated in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in patients with early stages of AD [16]. Sell et al. also found that Ephexin5 expression is upregulated by two to three fold in human AD brains and is elevated in the hippocampus of the J20 AD mouse models [17]. Additionally, Aβ-triggered neuronal damage is now recognized as a central feature of AD pathology [18] and treating cultured mouse neurons or stereotaxic injection in brains of wild-type (WT) mice with soluble Aβ was sufficient to increase Ephexin5 expression [17]. Importantly, genetic removal of endogenous Ephexin5 from J20 AD mice ameliorates cellular, behavioral, and physiological deficits in the AD animals [17]. Further, acute reduction of endogenous Ephexin5 protein levels via lentivirus-mediated shRNA expression in a subset of dentate gyrus granule cells of adult AD mice was sufficient to rescue a learning and memory phenotype in these animals [17]. Previous studies have determined that in AD there is pathological elevation in the activity of RhoA [19]. Thus, Ephexin5 is hypothesized to link two characteristic biochemical pathways of AD pathophysiology: the Aβ-induced decrease in EphB2 signaling and elevated RhoA activation. The precise mechanism of how these events are accomplished is not yet understood [Figure 1].
Figure 1.
A: In healthy brains, EphB2 receptors dimerize and are activated in response to interaction with ligands such as Ephrins [13]. Active EphB2 receptors can phosphorylate the RhoA GEF Ephexin5 [13]. Ephexin5 is then ubiquitinated and targeted for proteasomal degradation. This prevents Ephexin5 from activating RhoA to inhibit spine formation and thus leading to “spine permissive” conditions. B: In Alzheimer’s disease, EphB2 expression is downregulated by Amyloid Beta [15]. Thus, Ephexin5 is likely less inhibited by EphB2 phosphorylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation. This is evident by the pathological accumulation of Ephexin5 in AD mouse and human brains [17]. This elevated Ephexin5 leads to “spine restrictive” conditions. The most likely explanation of this is due to Ephexin5 activating RhoA which is considered to be a major contributor to AD pathology. Based on our current understanding, Ephexin5 is a novel, Aβ-independent drug target that targets key pathways underlying AD and is likely to have limited off target effects due to its low expression in healthy tissue. Created with BioRender.
Expert Opinion
Previous studies have suggested the importance of RhoA GEFs in the progression of AD and as potential drug targets to treat AD [20]. The study by Sell et. al, is among the few to test this hypothesis and goes on to identify a new and critical RhoA GEF, Ephexin5, to be relevant to AD-associated synaptic pathology and cognitive dysfunction. Moreover, an intriguing feature of Ephexin5, distinct from other potential drug targets, is that its expression is very low in healthy adult tissue and generally enriched in hippocampus [17]. This suggests that Ephexin5 is a comparatively specific therapeutic target owing to its pathological elevation in expression. Future targets of this nature may prove to be very safe, as they likely will limit effects of inhibition on healthy cells. Thus, it is feasible to generate an inhibitor, proteolysis-targeting chimera, or negative allosteric modulator of Ephexin5 in order to provide a new and critical avenue for therapeutic intervention for treating AD and test our hypothesis that treating AD in humans can be accomplished through correcting synapse pathology.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01 MH102364-02 awarded to SS Margolis.), the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (grant no. 1232825 awarded to GL Sell), the Department of Neuroscience graduate program at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (5T32EY017203-15 from 09/1/2012 to 8/31/2013 awarded to GL Sell.) and the National Institutes of Health graduate student training grant awarded to the Biochemistry Cellular and Molecular Biology graduate program at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (T32 GM007445 awarded to EK Cook and TB Schaffer).
Footnotes
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of considerable interest (••) to readers
- [1].Kawas CH. Clinical practice. Early Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med 2003;349:1056–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease: genes, proteins, and therapy. Physiol. Rev 2001;81:741–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Alzheimer’s Association. 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018;14:367–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Gandy S The role of cerebral amyloid beta accumulation in common forms of Alzheimer disease. J. Clin. Invest 2005;115:1121–1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Morishima Y, Gotoh Y, Zieg J, et al. Beta-amyloid induces neuronal apoptosis via a mechanism that involves the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway and the induction of Fas ligand. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:7551–7560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Mullane K, Williams M. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) therapeutics – 1: Repeated clinical failures continue to question the amyloid hypothesis of AD and the current understanding of AD causality. Biochem. Pharmacol 2018;158:359–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Coleman PD, Yao PJ. Synaptic slaughter in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2003;24:1023–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Masliah E, Mallory M, Alford M, et al. Altered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2001;56:127–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, et al. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann. Neurol 1991;30:572–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Davies CA, Mann DM, Sumpter PQ, et al. A quantitative morphometric analysis of the neuronal and synaptic content of the frontal and temporal cortex in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci 1987;78:151–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Blanco-Silvente L, Castells X, Saez M, et al. Discontinuation, Efficacy, and Safety of Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of 43 Randomized Clinical Trials Enrolling 16 106 Patients. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol 2017;20:519–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Matsunaga S, Kishi T, Iwata N. Memantine monotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Margolis SS, Salogiannis J, Lipton DM, et al. EphB-mediated degradation of the RhoA GEF Ephexin5 relieves a developmental brake on excitatory synapse formation. Cell. 2010;143:442–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Schaffer TB, Smith JE, Cook EK, et al. PKCε Inhibits Neuronal Dendritic Spine Development through Dual Phosphorylation of Ephexin5. Cell Rep. 2018;25:2470–2483.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Cissé M, Halabisky B, Harris J, et al. Reversing EphB2 depletion rescues cognitive functions in Alzheimer model. Nature. 2011;469:47–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Blalock EM, Geddes JW, Chen KC, et al. Incipient Alzheimer’s disease: microarray correlation analyses reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2004;101:2173–2178.* This study provides evidence from human tissue samples that Ephexin5 is upregulated in the AD brain.
- [17].Sell GL, Schaffer TB, Margolis SS. Reducing expression of synapse-restricting protein Ephexin5 ameliorates Alzheimer’s-like impairment in mice. J. Clin. Invest 2017;127:1646–1650.** This study is among the first to demonstrate that Ephexin5 may be a therapeutic target for treating Alzheimer’s disease.
- [18].Standridge JB. Vicious cycles within the neuropathophysiologic mechanisms of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res 2006;3:95–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Pozueta J, Lefort R, Ribe EM, et al. Caspase-2 is required for dendritic spine and behavioural alterations in J20 APP transgenic mice. Nat. Commun 2013;4:1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lefort R Reversing synapse loss in Alzheimer’s disease: Rho-guanosine triphosphatases and insights from other brain disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:19–28.* This review highlights the relevance of RhoGTPases in AD.

