Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1971 Jan-Feb;75A(1):27–32. doi: 10.6028/jres.075A.004

Refinement of the Crystal Structure of the Aragonite Phase of CaCO3

B Dickens 1, J S Bowen 1
PMCID: PMC6715969  PMID: 34876711

Abstract

Aragonite (CaCO3) crystallizes in the unit cell a = 4.9598(5) Å, b = 7.9641(9) Å, and c = 5.7379(6) Å at 25 °C with four formula weights in space-group Pmcn. The structure has been refined to Rw = 0.024, R = 0.040 using 765 x-ray reflections from a single crystal. The Ca ion is coordinated to nine oxygens with Ca … O distances in the range 2.414(2) Å to 2.653(1) Å. The two unique C—O distances in the CO3 group are 1.288(2) Å (on the mirror plane) and 1.283(1) Å. The two unique O—C—O angles are 119.6(2)° (across the mirror plane) and 120.13(8)°. The distances and angles in the CO3 group are not significantly different at the 95 percent confidence level.

Keywords: Calcium carbonates, carbonates, crystal structure, single crystal x-ray diffraction

1. Introduction

Aragonite (CaCO3) is found in nature as a mineral and is an important biomineral because of its presence in coral, clam shells, gallstones, and otoliths. It is isostructural with the carbonates of large divalent cations such as Ba, Sr, and Pb.

Aragonite is less stable than the calcite phase of CaCO3 at room temperature, transforms into calcite, and is denser than calcite. Thus aragonite is a high pressure form of CaCO3. More details are available in reference [1].1 Because of the importance of aragonite, and because of the possibility of performing calculations on the lattice energies of selected carbonates along the lines suggested by Busing [2], we have collected new x-ray data from a single crystal of aragonite and have refined the structure from the positions given in 1924 by Bragg [3].

2. Structure Determination

Formula (ideal): CaCO3 (aragonite phase); Unit Cell: orthorhombic with a = 4.9598(5) Å, b = 7.9641(9) Å, c = 5.7379(6) Å at 25 °C (calculated by least squares from 12 2θ values observed on a diffractometer; volume: 226.65 Å3; radiation, Mo(Kα1), λ = 0.70926 Å; monochromator: highly oriented graphite crystal; space-group: Pmcn; contents 4(CaCO3); reciprocal lattice extinctions, hk0: h + k = 2n + 1, h0l: l = 2n + 1; observed density, 2.947(2) g · cm−3 [4]; calculated density, 2.944 g · cm−3; Crystal: material available was heavily twinned; a small wedge was the largest crystal fragment found which showed no evidence of twinning under optical and x-ray examination; this wedge was attached to thin borate glass fiber with clear household cement; fiber attached to insert in goniometer head with epoxy cement; origin of crystal, mineral sample #75538 from National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C. (Supplied by J. S. White, Jr.); linear absorption corrections made by 8 × 8 × 8 Gaussian quadrature using subroutines written by C. W. Burnham [5] and adapted by B. Dickens; maximum and minimum corrections for absorption = 0.880 and 0.963 (transmission factors). Intensity Data: number of reflections, 2356 collected from 3 octants and merged into a unique set of 765, of which 619 are “observed” and 146 are “unobserved”; unobserved reflections are those less than 2σ above background; maximum sin θ/λ for data 0.907 Å−1; method used to estimate data: θ–2θ scan, scintillation counter; diffractometer: Picker2 4-circle single-crystal diffractometer automated by PDP 8/I computer through FACS–1 interface and adapted to include least significant digit of counts; Computation: setting programs, those of reference [6] as adapted by Picker Nuclear Corporation; scan range: 1.4°+114.6Δλλ, Δλ = 0.692, λ = 0.70926 Å; scan parameters: backgrounds counted at higher and lower 2θ for 100 s each; θ–2θ scan at 0.25°/min for 2θ from one background position to the other; attenuators: 00.25 mm thick layers of Nb, 2 layers for first attenuator, 4 for second, 6 for third; scan range correction: table look-up method to obtain values recommended in reference [7]; intensity data on paper tape, processed by program written by B. Dickens for Univac 1108 computer; this program contains adaptations of subroutines written for similar program by F. A. Mauer (NBS), standard reflection plotting routine and extinct reflection editing routine from programs by J. M. Stewart, University of Maryland, and uses an intense standard reflection (at low 2θ angle) measured every 50 reflections to correct for any change in intensity of the primary x-ray beam. Counts in peak = I = P - (T/2TB) (BL + BH), σ(I) = [P + (BL + BH) (T/(2TB))2]1/2, F = [(AF)(LP)(I)]1/2, σ(F) = (σ(I)/2) (LP/I)1/2, LP = 2 sin 2θc/(cos2 2θm + cos2 2θc), β = −1.58883 × 1062(cos2 2θm + cos4 2θc) dA/dμ]/[AV2 sin2 θc(cos2 2θm + cos2 2θc)] (for extinction corrections, calculated at same time as absorption correction). P = counts at the peak position, BL and BH = background counts at lower and higher 2θ respectively, T = time spend counting peak, TB = time spent counting each background, AF = attenuator factor, LP = Lorentz-polarization correction, θc = Bragg angle for reflection under consideration, θm = Bragg angle for monochomator (= 6.005° here), A = transmission factor in the absorption correction, μ is the linear absorption coefficient, dA/dμ is in mm, V is the volume of the unit cell in Å3. Data merging program for equivalent reflections, written by B. Dickens for Univac 1108 computer; in this program each set of equivalent reflections is treated as follows: Reflections which were all unobserved were averaged and given the largest individual standard deviation in the set. Unobserved reflections in the presence of at least one observed reflection were discarded. Observed reflections which occurred only once in the reflection list subsequent to this step were copied unchanged but their standard deviations were increased by a factor of three. Observed reflections with magnitudes which agreed within the counting statistics and reflections with magnitudes whose ratios fell within the range 0.95 to 1.06 were averaged and given as standard deviation the maximum of the standard deviation from counting statistics and the standard deviation from the range estimate [8, 9]. Under these circumstances, reflections whose magnitudes did not pass the criteria were discarded. If no members of a set of equivalent reflections passed the criteria, the highest magnitude was taken and the associated standard deviation multiplied by five. The justification for these arbitrary increases of standard deviation is that, without some corroboration, every reflection is suspect because of the possibilities of multiple reflection, including the “tail” of nearby intense reflections in its measurement, change in intensity of x-ray beam during reflection measurement, misalignment of crystal, etc. Since we usually measure three sets of equivalent reflections with care the number of standard deviations increased in this way is very small. Scattering factors: those for the neutral atoms in reference [10]; least-squares refinements: full-matrix, with Σw(|F0| − |Fc|)2 minimized; refinements include unobserved reflections which calculate higher than 2σ above background; least-squares weights: 1/σ2(F); Rw = [Σw(|F0| − |Fc|)2w|F0|2]1/2, R = Σ||F0| − |Fc||/Σ|F0|; thermal parameters have the form exp [− 1/4(a*2B11h2 + b*2B22k2 + c*2B33l2 + 2a*b*B12hk + 2a*c*B13hl + 2b*c*B23kl)]. Most least squares and electron density synthesis calculations were carried out with the X-ray 67 system [11] of computing programs.

Final Refinement: Rw = 0.024; R = 0.040, average shift/error for last cycle =0.0017; standard deviation of an observation of unit weight = [Σw(F0Fc)2/(765 − 28)]1/2 = 0.775.

The structure was refined isotropically from the positions given by Bragg to Rw = 0.031, R = 0.047, and then anisotropically to Rw = 0.024, R = 0.040. The low value of Rw supports the earlier indications that the crystal used in the data collection is not twinned. The highest peak in an electron density difference synthesis calculated after anisotropic refinement to Rw= 0.024 corresponded to about 1/3 of an electron and was about 0.95 Å from C towards O(1). The largest correlation coefficients are 0.34–0.44 between the scale factor and the B11, B22 and B33 temperature factors of Ca.

Two cycles of least squares refinement in which the isotropic secondary extinction parameter r in F2=F unc 2/(1 + βr|Func|2) was varied [12] together with all other unconstrained parameters resulted in no change in Rw or R and gave a value of −0.3(9) × 10−8 for the extinction parameter. There was no significant change in the structural details or their standard deviations. Thus, we believe secondary extinction to be negligible in our crystal of aragonite. Only the observed reflections were used in these refinements. Three cycles of least squares refinement in which allowance was made for the anomalous scattering of Ca (values taken from reference 10) gave an increase from 0.024 to 0.025 for Rw. R was unchanged. There were no significant changes in the atomic positions.

The atomic parameters from the refinements without corrections for anomalous dispersion are given in table 1. The observed and calculated structure factors are given in table 2. The thermal parameters from the refinements which included corrections for the anomalous scattering of Ca are Ca: 0.71(1), 0.65(1), 0.65(1), 0.00, 0.00, −0.01(1); C: 0.67(5), 0.80(6), 0.43(5), 0.00, 0.00, 0.08(5); 0(1): 1.45(5), 0.51(4), 1.01(5), 0.00, 0.00, 0.04(5); 0(2): 0.67(3), 0.98(3), 1.00(3), −0.32(3), −0.02(3), −0.09(3). Only those for Ca are significantly different from the values in table 1. Distances and angles referred to in the paper were calculated using the values in table 1.

Table 1.

Atomic parameters in aragonite (CaCO3)

Atoms x y z B11* B22 B33 B12 B13 B23
Ca 0.25000 0.58507(5) 0.25974(6) 0.664(9) 0.599(9) 0.601(9) 0.0000 0.0000 −0.01(1)
C .25000 .2386(2) .4148(3) .75(5) .85(5) .46(5) .0000 .0000 .07(5)
O(1) .25000 .0770(2) .4043(2) 1.50(5) .54(4) 1.04(4) .0000 .0000 .03(4)
O(2) .4737(2) .3196(1) .4131(2) 0.71(3) 1.03(3) 1.02(3) −0.32(3) −.02(3) −.09(3)

Figures in parentheses are standard errors in last significant figure quoted, and were computed in the final cycle of full-matrix least-squares refinement.

*

Thermal parameters are in Å2.

Table 2.

Observed and calculated structure factors for aragonite (CaCO3)

0, K, 0
2 60 −61
4 298 −289
6 383 −357
8 264 −268
10 140 142
12 285 284
14 42 20
0, K, 1
1 28 21
2 472 −469
3 355 −344
4 654 −655
5 230 228
6 47 46
7 66 72
8 320 324
9 73 −75
10 153 151
11 79 80
12 40 33
13 80 −77
14 161 −159
0, K, 2
0 206 −210
1 577 558
2 409 −401
3 68 −69
4 238 234
5 16* −3
6 344 346
7 91 95
8 62 57
9 55 −61
10 133 −124
11 57 −59
12 140 −134
13 58 48
14 76 −69
0, K, 3
1 51 −50
2 491 489
3 17* 23
4 17* −1
5 30 30
6 19* 16
7 21* 21
8 112 −113
9 21* 0
10 230 −222
11 53 −31
12 126 121
13 27* −11
0, K, 4
0 102 103
1 338 334
2 253 251
3 51 50
4 160 −160
5 47 45
6 262 −258
7 21* 14
8 22* −28
9 103 −109
10 113 110
11 68 −66
12 100 98
13 69 69
0, K, 5
1 96 96
2 224 −223
3 133 134
4 283 −286
5 200 −199
6 23* 31
7 126 −126
8 212 208
9 61 63
10 113 108
11 26* −10
12 28* 11
0, K, 6
0 499 −506
1 80 −83
2 22* −13
3 106 −113
4 111 111
5 51 −47
6 214 210
7 39 35
8 136 144
9 80 83
10 89 −92
11 48 40
0, K, 7
1 89 −92
2 184 174
3 64 69
4 257 251
5 24* 16
6 25* −14
7 43 37
8 195 −193
9 29* 37
10 87 −90
0, K, 8
0 138 135
1 79 −82
2 123 123
3 102 108
4 106 −104
5 25* 20
6 160 −157
7 64 −64
8 51 −51
9 30* −26
0, K, 9
1 70 64
2 147 −150
3 27* −16
4 48 −44
5 57 −52
6 27* 0
7 46 −38
0, K, 10
0 48 −36
1 109 −110
2 88 −85
3 58 −52
1, K, 0
1 54 −61
3 464 477
5 49 45
7 131 −129
9 216 −212
11 22* −5
13 93 72
1, K, 1
1 423 421
2 160 153
3 51 −49
4 175 168
5 300 −300
6 20* 33
7 192 −187
8 88 −92
9 21* 13
10 34 −20
11 185 187
12 49 −44
13 91 89
14 47 39
1, K, 2
0 471 454
1 407 −404
2 16* −7
3 476 −471
4 16* −10
5 214 −217
6 153 −156
7 181 185
8 44 −42
9 241 242
10 24* −4
11 108 104
12 86 84
13 113 −109
14 30* 17
1, K, 3
1 510 −505
2 101 −95
3 27 −25
4 83 −82
5 363 365
6 18* −3
7 315 319
8 48 53
9 47 −43
10 42 40
11 150 −157
12 25* 3
13 188 −178
1, K, 4
0 96 85
1 290 287
2 84 −82
3 363 365
4 61 65
5 193 189
6 20* −6
7 157 −160
8 23* 17
9 222 −226
10 42 −44
11 104 −107
12 25* 7
13 101 97
1, K, 5
1 257 249
2 32 25
3 20* −14
4 20* 0
5 218 −216
6 22* −31
7 158 −162
8 23* 4
9 23* 6
10 45 −34
11 153 152
12 47 45
1, K, 6
0 60 60
1 21* −23
2 36 34
3 237 −239
4 43 −39
5 39 −31
6 54 −56
7 86 74
8 23* −15
9 152 152
10 38 33
11 27* 5
1, K, 7
1 146 −142
2 88 −97
3 33 15
4 94 −96
5 139 140
6 23* −9
7 88 90
8 97 95
9 25* −7
10 46 42
1, K, 8
0 181 −187
1 117 110
2 47 −20
3 143 146
4 36 27
5 80 81
6 135 133
7 85 −89
8 28* 37
9 111 −111
1, K, 9
1 145 145
2 95 93
3 29* 0
4 96 89
5 126 −129
6 43 3
7 131 −132
1, K, 10
0 47 42
1 95 −98
2 63 66
3 118 −119
2, K, 0
0 469 −494
2 477 −466
4 151 146
6 615 635
8 21* 4
10 71 −71
12 205 −201
14 119 −117
2, K, 1
1 264 254
2 653 659
3 253 −247
4 270 272
5 117 119
6 51 50
7 90 −85
8 256 −253
9 49 −55
10 227 −230
11 47 54
12 28* 28
13 28* 14
14 146 144
2, K, 2
0 515 513
1 123 120
2 141 142
3 61 −58
4 234 −237
5 189 −194
6 186 −184
7 158 157
8 156 −157
9 65 −69
10 146 148
11 46 42
12 160 155
13 39 36
2, K, 3
1 33 29
2 46 −50
3 18* 10
4 391 −393
5 38 −44
6 126 129
7 21* −24
8 177 180
9 22* 12
10 64 62
11 26* 21
12 38 −8
13 29* 12
2, K, 4
0 338 −336
1 18* 8
2 94 −86
3 116 −117
4 176 182
5 167 −168
6 116 117
7 163 162
8 132 129
9 24* 3
10 127 −129
11 54 56
12 135 −130
2, K, 5
1 201 −202
2 290 292
3 123 122
4 165 164
5 22* 10
6 23* 17
7 132 129
8 182 −180
9 46 37
10 150 −150
11 89 −96
12 48 27
2, K, 6
0 230 230
1 50 48
2 155 157
3 105 109
4 72 −69
5 75 63
6 343 −346
7 55 −55
8 24* −1
9 62 −71
10 57 47
11 30* −30
2, K, 7
1 34 26
2 252 −253
3 72 66
4 129 −133
5 116 −118
6 27* −28
7 27* −22
8 146 152
9 28* 23
10 149 147
2, K, 8
0 180 −180
1 53 −52
2 88 −83
3 63 −70
4 97 103
5 53 52
6 113 117
7 46 −46
8 85 84
2, K, 9
1 50 −50
2 56 52
3 37 −8
4 156 153
5 72 65
6 59 −51
2, K, 10
0 106 105
1 44 37
2 51 39
3, K, 0
1 191 −190
3 318 −323
5 19* 33
7 34 22
9 225 229
11 39 24
13 101 −102
3, K, 1
1 256 −259
2 206 −201
3 51 −46
4 18* 4
5 290 288
6 65 −58
7 172 169
8 44 43
9 45 −39
10 54 63
11 144 −146
12 27* 13
13 101 −88
3, K, 2
0 120 −122
1 206 204
2 74 −73
3 360 360
4 19* −25
5 200 204
6 189 198
7 194 −196
8 23* −21
9 198 −198
10 23* 9
11 90 −87
12 47 −47
13 105 83
3, K, 3
1 418 423
2 72 76
3 102 −99
4 59 57
5 221 −224
6 21* 3
7 268 −266
8 45 −42
9 24* −8
10 47 −38
11 179 184
12 28* −2
3, K, 4
0 38 33
1 168 −169
2 20* 18
3 305 −303
4 74 −77
5 191 −191
6 59 56
7 179 179
8 60 −59
9 189 186
10 46 46
11 87 86
12 28* 15
3, K, 5
1 195 −197
2 40 33
3 21* −19
4 71 −72
5 220 213
6 49 47
7 154 146
8 26* 23
9 24* −20
10 25* −4
11 120 −123
3, K, 6
0 64 −64
1 88 85
2 23* −27
3 203 204
4 41 39
5 24* −7
6 47 45
7 24* −18
8 27* 18
9 164 −162
10 48 −28
3, K, 7
1 107 114
2 119 120
3 24* 19
4 43 46
5 150 −150
6 26* 22
7 79 −87
8 68 −70
9 29* 26
3, K, 8
0 129 122
1 82 −85
2 51 43
3 136 −136
4 29 −12
5 94 −82
6 151 −153
7 96 94
3, K, 9
1 143 −147
2 89 −90
3 44 35
4 78 −74
5 89 92
4, K, 0
0 668 675
2 39 39
4 152 −145
6 268 −275
8 196 −171
10 116 116
12 225 217
4, K, 1
1 19* 4
2 266 −268
3 106 −111
4 335 −340
5 86 93
6 35 26
7 37 37
8 236 237
9 50 −43
10 128 129
11 51 56
12 30* 23
4, K, 2
0 189 −187
1 187 189
2 203 −202
3 48 −52
4 161 159
5 21* 16
6 234 236
7 46 43
8 61 58
9 45 −34
10 100 −101
11 28* −36
12 120 −117
4, K, 3
1 44 −34
2 268 272
3 21* 10
4 77 71
5 22* 26
6 22* 2
7 37 20
8 112 −111
9 25* 0
10 184 −170
11 27* −26
12 92 92
4, K, 4
0 121 119
1 175 176
2 169 163
3 35 30
4 123 −128
5 47 48
6 192 −192
7 31 −7
8 48 −38
9 81 −80
10 86 89
11 49 −46
4, K, 5
1 83 74
2 175 −177
3 65 68
4 203 −207
5 130 −131
6 25* 21
7 92 −91
8 169 165
9 29* 40
10 110 94
4, K, 6
0 359 −357
1 58 −60
2 36 −21
3 98 −86
4 92 79
5 47 −38
6 190 182
7 27* 30
8 106 105
9 87 67
4, K, 7
1 61 −69
2 152 146
3 44 41
4 191 191
5 27* 23
6 29* −11
7 30* 34
8 152 −152
4, K, 8
0 115 116
1 61 −53
2 100 97
3 96 91
4 94 −87
5 29* 10
6 124 −126
4, K, 9
1 62 54
2 111 −117
3 28* −11
5, K, 0
1 48 −45
3 271 275
5 94 86
7 138 −144
9 135 −136
11 28* 0
5, K, 1
1 226 225
2 28 −10
3 50 −57
4 113 119
5 164 −161
6 23* −3
7 131 −134
8 81 −76
9 42 −10
10 42 25
11 161 160
5, K, 2
0 221 225
1 206 −210
2 49 −54
3 235 −232
4 21* −11
5 112 −109
6 43 −38
7 104 101
8 56 −58
9 183 186
10 26* 1
11 91 80
5, K, 3
1 213 −215
2 42 −43
3 59 −72
4 48 −48
5 258 263
6 23* −1
7 224 213
8 54 39
9 73 −67
10 27* 25
11 77 −83
5, K, 4
0 88 83
1 193 195
2 92 −88
3 217 211
4 43 37
5 101 102
6 26* 39
7 84 −88
8 26* −14
9 178 −175
10 29* −28
5, K, 5
1 177 177
2 62 67
3 39 −29
4 43 −30
5 149 −140
6 25* −4
7 118 −121
8 28* 15
9 27* −5
5, K, 6
0 48 41
1 36 19
2 25* 30
3 190 −189
4 27* −27
5 53 −54
6 51 −49
7 94 93
8 28* −10
5, K, 7
1 120 −122
2 50 −44
3 49 34
4 101 −97
5 90 91
6 45 5
7 65 70
5, K, 8
0 168 −166
1 93 93
2 35 6
3 108 107
4 30* 26
6, K, 0
0 257 −256
2 128 −131
4 83 85
6 300 299
8 26* 24
10 60 −45
6, K, 1
1 47 43
2 243 241
3 56 −51
4 157 161
5 42 41
6 24* 17
7 47 −45
8 178 −170
9 28* −9
10 139 −136
6, K, 2
0 205 210
1 23* 5
2 97 97
3 23* 7
4 126 −123
5 75 −62
6 141 −139
7 66 60
8 89 −92
9 47 −43
10 104 101
6, K, 3
1 39 23
2 98 −102
3 23* 2
4 201 −191
5 38 −28
6 67 64
7 26* −17
8 105 107
9 27* 5
6, K, 4
0 170 −173
1 25* −31
2 80 −77
3 47 −50
4 109 107
5 73 −76
6 103 105
7 86 79
8 83 79
9 26* 6
6, K, 5
1 89 −93
2 168 166
3 49 42
4 116 119
5 52 20
6 28* 6
7 89 84
8 129 −127
6, K, 6
0 186 174
1 29* 32
2 91 79
3 60 67
4 71 −53
5 29* 37
6 201 −203
6, K, 7
1 49 30
2 152 −151
3 46 25
4 104 −98
7, K, 0
1 124 −122
3 177 −172
5 27* 20
7 29* −11
9 171 167
7, K, 1
1 124 −126
2 103 −92
3 41 −37
4 43 41
5 171 175
6 55 −41
7 97 105
8 41 11
7, K, 2
0 25* −10
1 82 82
2 44 −39
3 184 179
4 26* −23
5 116 116
6 130 122
7 128 −127
8 47 −42
7, K, 3
1 228 211
2 43 37
3 86 −82
4 36 26
5 97 −94
6 28* 1
7 157 −151
8 49 −23
7, K, 4
0 50 52
1 81 −73
2 25* 1
3 175 −165
4 54 −51
5 113 −116
6 49 45
7 132 122
7, K, 5
1 115 −112
2 31* 28
3 29* −21
4 82 −77
5 136 139
7, K, 6
0 48 −46
1 73 80
2 30* −16
3 126 124
8, K, 0
0 247 235
2 47 42
4 50 −54
6 181 −172
8, K, 1
1 26* −5
2 147 −143
3 27* −10
4 142 −142
5 28* 13
6 28* 10
8, K, 2
0 127 −122
1 50 42
2 85 −89
3 29* −33
4 92 90
5 40 25
8, K, 3
1 40 −19
2 120 115
3 28* 2
4 90 87
5 28* 17
8, K, 4
0 100 96
1 63 59
2 80 78
3 30* 15

Columns are K, 10Fo, 10Fc. Fo and Fc are on an absolute scale. Reflections marked

*

are “unobserved”.

3. Description of the Structure

The structure of aragonite, the main points of which are well known, is shown in figure 1. The Ca ions lie in pseudohexagonal layers parallel to (001) and the layer sequence is ABAB. The Ca layers are separated by CO3 groups which lie in two layers parallel to (001), and form columns parallel to [001].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A stereoscopic illustration of the crystal structure of aragonite (CaCO3).

A unique set of atoms is labeled. The origin of the crystallographic coordinate system is marked by *.

3.1. The Ca Ion Environments

The Ca ion lies on the mirror plane at x = 1/4. Its environment is shown in figure 2 and summarized in table 3. The coordination of nine oxygens to Ca consists of three CO3 edges, O(1, 2), O(1I, 2I) and O(2IV, 2V) and three apexes, O(1II, 2II, 2III). The apparent thermal motion of Ca is almost isotropic (table 1, fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The Ca environment in aragonite (CaCO3).

Table 3.

The Ca environment in aragonite (CaCO3)

Atoms Distance, *Lower *Noncorrelaled
Å raw bound [13] motion [13]
Ca, O(1II) 2.414(2) 2.414 2.423
Ca, O(2II, 2III) 2.445(1) 2.445 2.454
Ca, O(2, 2I) 2.520(1) 2.520 2.527
Ca, O(2IV,2V) 2.544(1) 2.544 2.551
Ca, O(1, 1I) 2.653(1) 2.653 2.660

In all tables of interatomic distances and angles, the figures in parentheses are standard deviations in the last digit and were calculated from the standard deviations in the atomic positional parameters and the unit cell parameters.

*

Mean separation between atoms when allowance is made for thermal motion.

Corrections as given by Busing and Levy [13] to obtain the mean separation between atoms from the observed atomic positional and thermal parameters were calculated using a program written by Finger [12]. These corrections are included in tables 3 and 4.

Table 4.

The CO3 group and its environment in aragonite (CaCO3)

Atoms Distance, Å or angle, deg. Lower bound [13] Riding model [13]
C, O(1) 1.288(2) Å 1.289 Å 1.295 Å
C, O(2) 1.283(1) 1.284 1.288
O(1), O(2) 2.229(1)
O(2), O(2I) 2.219(2)
O(1), C, O(2) 120.13(8)°
O(2), C, O(2I) 119.6(2)
O (1), CaV 2.414(2) Å
O (1), (CaII, CaIII) 2.653(1)
O(2), Ca 2.445(1)
O(2), CaII 2.520(1)
O(2), CaIV 2.544(1)

3.2. The CO3 Group

The details of the CO3 group and its environment are given in table 4 and shown in figure 3. The positions reported by Bragg [3] give C–O distances of 1.26 Å and 1.30 Å, and O–C–O angles of 117°, 117° and 127°, which, under the circumstances, are all close to those reported here. The C–O distances and O – C – O angles reported here for the CO3 group do not differ from each other significantly at the 95 percent confidence level; the same is true for the O–C–O angles. In view of the possibility of unknown systematic error, necessarily excluded from the calculations, our results therefore do not preclude trigonality of the CO3 group. Because the oxygens in the CO3 group have very similar environments, little deviation from trigonality is expected. The CO3 group is nonplanar however. The carbon atom is 0.026(4) Å out of the plane of the oxygen atoms in the CO3 group in aragonite. This displacement is approximately seven times the standard deviation and is clearly significant. The displacement is towards the nearest Ca layer and is presumably a result of polarization of each oxygen atom by the three bonded Ca ions. If the displacement were caused by Ca … C interactions, the C atom would not move towards the Ca layer.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The CO3 group environment in aragonite (CaCO3).

The labels refer to atoms in table 4.

The difference in the O–C–O angles, 119.6° and 120.13°, if real, is consistent with the O(2, 2I) edge of the CO3 group being coordinated slightly more strongly to Ca as judged from the Ca … O distances. However, this stronger coordination of O(2) to Ca would also suggest that C–O(2) should be longer than C–O(1). This is not the case. The average value of the C–O distances is 1.286 Å. This agrees well with the C–O distances of 1.283(2) A reported [14] for calcite in which 32 symmetry is forced on the CO3 group by space-group R3¯c. If the apparent thermal motions of the atoms in the CO3 group are attributed to thermal motion rather than to slight positional disorder, there seems to be oscillation within the CO3 layer, i.e., more or less perpendicular to the edge coordination to Ca. Similarly, O(1) may be undergoing some additional wagging out of the CO3 layer.

Acknowledgments

We thank W. E. Brown for helpful discussions and P. B. Kingsbury for technical help. The ORTEP program of C. K. Johnson, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, was used to draw the figures. This investigation was supported in part by research grant DE–00572 to the American Dental Association from the National Institute of Dental Research, and is part of the dental research program conducted by the National Bureau of Standards in cooperation with the American Dental Association; the United States Army Medical Research and Development Command; the Dental Sciences Division of the School of Aerospace Medicine, USAF; the National Institute of Dental Research; and the Veterans Administration.

Research Associate from the American Dental Association at the National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234.

Footnotes

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

2

Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to adequately specify the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Bureau of Standards, nor does it imply that the material or equipment identified is necessarily the best available for the purpose.

4. References

  • [1].Palache C., Berman H., and Frondel C., Dana’s system of mineralogy, vol. II, 7th ed., J. Wiley and Sons, N.Y. 1963, 182–193. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Busing W. R., An aid to the analysis of interionic and inter-molecular forces in crystals. Abstract M1. American Crystallographic Association winter meeting, Tucson, Arizona; (1968). [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Bragg W. L., The structure of aragonite. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 105, 16–39 (1924). [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Reference [1], page 184.
  • [5].Burnham C. W., Computation of absorption corrections and the significance of end effect. Am. Min., 51, 159–167 (1966). [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Busing W. R., Ellison R. D., Levy H. A., King S. P., and Roseberry R. T., The Oak Ridge Laboratory Computer-controlled X-ray Diffractometer. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL 4143, January 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Alexander L. E., and Smith G. S., Single crystal intensity measurements with the three circle counter diffractometer. Acta Cryst., 15, 983–1004 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Ibers J. A., Estimates of the standard deviations of the observed structure factors and of the electron density from intensity data. Acta Cryst., 9, 652–654 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Tippett L. H. C., On the extreme individuals and the range of samples taken from a normal population. Biometrika, 17, 364–387 (1925). [Google Scholar]
  • [10].International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, 3, p. 202 The Kynoch Press, Birmingham, England, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Stewart J. M., Editor. X-ray 67 program system for X-ray crystallography. Technical report 67–58, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, December (1967). [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Finger L. W., Determination of cation distribution by least squares refinement of single crystal x-ray data. Carnegie Institute of Washington Year Book, 67, 216–217 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Busing W. R., and Levy H. A., The effect of thermal motion on the estimation of bond lengths from diffraction measurements. Acta Cryst., 17, 142–146 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Chessin H., Hamilton W. C., and Post B., Position and thermal parameters of oxygen atoms in calcite. Acta Cryst., 18, 689–693 (1965). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES