Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0221927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221927

Risk factors for nutrition-related chronic disease among adults in Indonesia

Vanessa M Oddo 1,*, Masumi Maehara 2, Doddy Izwardy 3, Anung Sugihantono 4, Pungkas B Ali 5, Jee Hyun Rah 2
Editor: A Kofi Amegah6
PMCID: PMC6716634  PMID: 31469876

Abstract

Objective

To conduct a secondary data analysis detailing the associations between sociodemographic and behavioral factors and nutrition-related chronic disease.

Methods

These analyses utilized 2014 data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey, a home-based survey that collected socioeconomic, dietary intake, physical activity, and biological data among adults. We explored four outcomes in relation to sociodemographic and behavioral determinants: 1) hypertension, 2) elevated high-sensitivity c-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and 3) central obesity, as these are critical metabolic determinants in the progression to cardiovascular disease, and 4) type 2 diabetes. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90mm or current use of antihypertensive medication. Elevated hs-CRP was defined as hs-CRP >3 mg/dL. Central obesity was defined as waist circumference ≥ 90 cm if male and waist circumference ≥ 80 cm if female, which are specific to South Asia. Type 2 diabetes was defined as glycated hemoglobin ≥ 6.5%. We employed separate gender-stratified multivariate logistic regression models to test the associations between sociodemographic and behavioral determinants and each nutrition-related chronic disease outcome. All analyses employed sampling weights, which account for the survey design.

Results

In 2014, about 30% of adults were hypertensive and one-fifth had elevated hs-CRP. Approximately 70% of women had central obesity and 11.6% of women and 8.9% of men had diabetes. Older-age was consistently associated with nutrition-related chronic disease and being overweight was associated with hypertension, elevated hs-CRP, and type 2 diabetes. Regularly consuming instant noodles (women) and soda (men) were associated with elevated hs-CRP and soda consumption was associated with central obesity among men.

Conclusions

Large segments of the adult population in Indonesia now have or are at risk for non-communicable disease. Our analyses provide preliminary empirical evidence that interventions that target healthful food intake (e.g. reduce the intake of ultra-processed foods) should be considered and that the reduction of overweight is critical for preventing chronic diseases in Indonesia.

Introduction

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have become the leading causes of death in middle-income countries [1]. In Indonesia nearly three-quarters of all deaths are attributed to NCDs, of which one-third are due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) [2]. Indonesia is also home to 10 million diabetic individuals, which ranks sixth in the world [3] and the prevalence is greater than 10% in remote, non-urban areas [4]. While cancer is less prevalent in Indonesia, about 350,000 new cases of cancer are diagnosed each year, accounting for 12% of mortality in 2016 [2].

Concurrently, the leading causes of disability adjusted life years in Indonesia were heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes, in 2016 [5]. This high NCD burden is a major driver of health care spending in Indonesia. In 2015, healthcare expenditures totaled USD 28 million [6], which translates into USD 383 annually per person, more than half of which are individual out-of-pocket expenditures [7]. By 2040 health expenditures are expected to triple, largely due to the increasing NCD prevalence [7]. In addition, between 2012 and 2030, the projected economic output loss due to NCDs is an estimated USD 4.5 trillion [8]. Moreover, NCDs are thought to be a major barrier to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

The nutrition transition, characterized by unhealthier diets and physical inactivity, has played a major role in the behavioral and metabolic risk factors for NCDs. Unhealthy diets, particularly diets high in fat [9], sodium [10], and sugar [1113], have been strongly associated with a range of NCDs. Dietary risk factors, including high intake of sodium and low intake of whole grains and fruits, are among the leading causes of NCD-related deaths and disability in Indonesia and globally [5,14]. Diet data in Indonesia, particularly as it relates to the consumption of energy- or sodium-dense foods, is limited. However, available data have shown inadequate consumption of fruits and vegetables, high intake of sodium, and an increase in the percent of total energy coming from fat [3,1419]. Physical inactivity has also contributed to NCDs [20] and disability, in Indonesia [5], and data suggest that the population is increasingly adopting a more sedentary lifestyle [16,2123].

In turn, a number of studies have linked these behavioral risk factors to metabolic risk factors for NCDs [9,2427]. For example, excess sodium consumption is related to hypertension risk [24,25], and excess sugar consumption is related to central obesity [26] and elevated high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) [28,29], all of which are related to CVD [19,30,31]. Hypertension and high body mass index (BMI) were the top metabolic risk factors driving death and disability in Indonesia in 2017 [5]. Relatedly, between 1993 and 2007, central obesity and hypertension increased by 22% and 7%, respectively [21].

Relatively few studies have used national data to explore both sociodemographic and behavioral determinants of nutrition-related NCDs in Indonesia. Fewer have used biological data to do so. The primary aim of this paper was to conduct a secondary data analysis detailing four outcomes in relation to sociodemographic and behavioral determinants: 1) hypertension, 2) elevated hs-CRP, and 3) central obesity, as these are critical metabolic determinants in the progression to CVD, and 4) type 2 diabetes. We believe this evidence will be useful in informing policies and programs that aim to reduce NCDs in Indonesia [21].

Materials and methods

Survey design and study population

These analyses utilized the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS), an ongoing longitudinal, home-based study that was initiated in 1993 [32]. There have been four subsequent survey rounds (1997, 2000, 2007, 2014). The original, multi-stage sampling frame was based on households from 13 out of 27 provinces, which represented 83% of the Indonesian population in 1993 [32]. For these analyses, we utilized 2014 data from adults aged above 19 years, due to data availability (described below). In Indonesia, eight new provinces have been created since 1999, thus, in 2014, 24 of 34 provinces were represented.

Among the original 33,081 household members enrolled in the IFLS, about one-third, (11,040) were found in their original IFLS households in 2014, approximately 9,000 were found elsewhere and about 4,500 had died. The recontact rate (including deaths) in 2014 among individuals enrolled in 1993 was 76%. Over the course of the survey, 11,889 (54%) responded in all survey waves [32].

Survey questions & measurements

Data were collected on household- and individual-level characteristics, as well as diet, physical activity, and health. The household questionnaire was completed by the head of household and recorded information on household size, physical infrastructure, access to sanitation, area of residence (urban/rural), and food expenditures. While the topics covered in the individual-level adult questionnaire were wide-ranging, these analyses utilized information on gender, age, educational attainment, marital status, employment, and smoking status. Adults were asked whether they ate each food type “in the last week” and as appropriate, the frequency of consumption (number of days). Self-reported consumption of dietary staples (e.g. rice, eggs, meat, green leafy vegetables, sweet potatoes) was recorded, and in 2014, consumption of some ultra-processed foods, including instant noodles, fast food, soft drinks, and fried snacks, were also recorded. Ultra-processed foods are typically “ready-to-consume” and are entirely or mostly made from industrial ingredients and additives, not foods [33]. In addition to being energy-dense, they are also characteristically high in fat, sugar, and/or salt (unlike rice, which would be considered energy-dense). Consumption of ultra-processed foods was of interest in these analyses as they have become more common worldwide [33], their availability and consumption increases as countries undergo their nutrition transition, and their consumption has been associated with poor chronic-disease related health [3437] and weight gain in one experimental study [37].

Adults in this sample also self-reported any vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, and/or walking (during the last week) using a modified version of the International Survey on Physical Activities. Vigorous activity was defined as any activities that make you breathe much harder than normal (e.g. heavy lifting). Moderate activity was defined as any activities that make you breathe somewhat harder than normal (e.g. carrying light loads). Walking included walking from place to place, walking for recreation, and walking at work and at home.

All health measurements were collected by trained enumerators, using a rigorous research protocol, whereby measurements were supervised and subject to quality control procedures [32]. Height was measured to the nearest millimeter using a Seca plastic height board. Weight was measured to the nearest one-tenth of a kilogram using a Camry model EB1003 scale. Waist circumference (for adults aged ≥ 40 years) was measured to the nearest millimeter with a tape measure. Blood pressure was taken three times, on alternate arms from a seated position, using an Omron meter, HEM-720. Large cuffs were available as needed.

In 2007 (IFLS wave 4), dried blood spots (DBS) were collected among a random sample of individuals from wave 1 of the IFLS (1993). Those same respondents were re-contacted in 2014 to continue to collect DBS. A finger prick was taken and blood drops drawn for measurement of hs-CRP and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Prior to the finger prick, hand warmers were used to increase blood flow. The first drops of blood were used with the hemoglobin and secondary drops were put onto Whatman 903 Protein Saver Cards [32]. Cards were allowed to dry for at least 4 hours and stored with a desiccant to keep samples dry. Samples were kept cool, mailed back to headquarters in Yogyakarta, and then, stored at—40 Celsius, until assayed [38]. The assay used to measure hs-CRP in 2007 was no longer on the market when the most recent IFLS wave was fielded [38]; in 2014, the hs-CRP enzyme immunoassay kit was manufactured by Percipio Biosciences (Catalog Number 11190) [39]. The HbA1c assay was based on a validated protocol, described by Hu and colleagues [40]. Validation samples, for both hs-CRP and HbA1C, were provided by the University of Washington (Seattle, U.S.) and the University of Southern California/University of California Los Angeles’ Center on Biodemography and Population Health (Los Angeles, U.S.) prepared additional blood spots that were used as controls for the assays [39]. Samples were analyzed at the University of Washington and in Indonesia. Using regression-based methods, DBS results were converted to plasma-equivalent values for hs-CRP and whole blood equivalent values for HbA1c, based on repeated measurements of the validation samples [39]. Approximately, 6,300 adults aged ≥ 19 years (~ 2,800 men and ~ 3,500 women) had usable CRP or HbA1c data and sample weights. Subjects with incomplete data and pregnant women were excluded from these analyses.

Statistical analysis

We explored associations between risk factors and four dependent variables: hypertension, elevated hs-CRP, central obesity, and type 2 diabetes (henceforth referred to as diabetes). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were based on the average of three measurements. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm or current use of antihypertensive medication [41,42]. Elevated hs-CRP was defined as hs-CRP >3 mg/dL, based on increased risk for CVD [31]. Central obesity was defined as waist circumference ≥ 90 cm if male and waist circumference ≥ 80 cm if female, which are specific to populations in South Asia [43]. Clinical guidelines define diabetes as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) ≥ 6.5% [44].

Prior literature, along with the availability of data in the IFLS, were used to identify the independent variables in regression models. Consumption of ultra-processed foods (versus not consuming), physical activity (versus no activity), smoking (versus not smoking) and urban residence (versus rural) were modeled as binary variables. Appropriate cutoffs were applied to create dichotomous or categorical variables for age, education, employment, family size, and food expenditures. A composite of household wealth was created using principal component analysis, using following variables: type of floor material, type of toilet, type of cooking fuel and ownership of assets including: land, livestock, vehicle(s), household appliances, furniture and utensils, jewelry, and monetary savings. Wealth was divided into quintiles, based on the distribution of the data. In models exploring hypertension, elevated hs-CRP, and diabetes as the outcome, overweight/obesity (henceforth referred to as overweight) was included as an independent variable and was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

We first employed separate, gender-stratified univariate logistic regression models to investigate risk factors and their association with each outcome (S1S4 Tables). Independent variables that were statistically significantly associated with the dependent variable in univariate models were then included in multivariable logistic regression models. Age, urban/rural residence, and wealth were included in the multivariable models irrespective of statistical significance.

In sensitivity analyses we defined overweight as BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2, because a substantial proportion of Asian people have a higher risk of diabetes and CVD at lower BMIs [45] (S5S7 Tables). We assessed multicollinearity in all models. Alpha was set to 0.05. All analyses employed sampling weights, which account both for sample attrition from 1993 to 2014, and account for the original sample design, which included an over-sample of urban areas; thus, this sample is representative of the 2014 Indonesian population in those provinces. Analyses were performed using Stata 15.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Survey participants provided written informed consent. The data used for this study are retrospective and the authors did not have access to any identifying information. As such, ethical approval was not required.

Results

A majority of the sample (N = 15,648 women, N = 13,567 men) was middle-aged (30–59 years) and about half had a primary level of education (Table 1). Nearly all women were non-smokers (96.3%), compared to 32.8% of men. About one-third of women were not working (37.1%), compared to 10.2% of men. Half of the adults resided in urban areas and slightly larger proportions resided in lower (versus higher) wealth households.

Table 1. Selected characteristics of adults in Indonesia, 2014.

Women Men
N = 15,648 N = 13,567
n %a n %a
Demographic and Sociodemographic
Age (in years)
 19–29 4,350 16.0 3,397 23.0
 30–39 4,458 18.3 3,990 18.9
 40–49 2,827 24.7 2,774 19.1
 50–59 2,074 21.6 1,755 20.8
 ≥ 60 1,939 19.5 1,651 18.1
Education
 No Education 1,078 13.3 389 5.4
 Primary 5,026 47.3 4,197 44.7
 Junior or Senior 4,955 30.1 4,738 38.4
 University 1,618 9.2 1,471 11.5
Marital Status
 Never Married 1,288 5.2 2,174 14.4
 Married 12,112 74.3 10,808 80.4
 Other 2,244 20.5 580 5.1
Employment Status
 Not working 5,876 37.1 1,198 10.2
 Agriculture-based Labor 2,397 19.6 3,532 29.4
 Skilled Manual Laborb 1,335 8.9 2,852 21.3
 Skilled Laborc 5,771 34.3 5,744 39.2
Residence
 Rural 6,439 51.0 5,596 49.8
 Urban 9,209 49.0 7,969 50.2
Wealth
 Lowest 2,903 24.7 2,857 26.1
 Second 2,628 22.0 2,500 22.0
 Middle 1,887 16.8 1,826 16.8
 Fourth 2,191 18.6 2,077 18.4
 Highest 2,058 17.8 1,930 16.8
Province
 Bali 780 2.2 711 2.1
 Central Java 2,008 17.4 1,705 17.2
 East Java 2,152 26.0 1,774 23.5
 Jakarta 936 5.1 854 5.1
 Lampung 632 3.3 603 3.5
 North Sumatra 1,128 5.0 1,014 5.1
 South Kalimantan 702 3.1 607 2.9
 South Sumatra 732 3.6 698 4.0
 South Sulawesi 797 3.6 635 2.9
 West Java 2,141 17.9 1,812 21.3
 West Nusa Tenggara 1,183 3.1 986 2.7
 West Sumatra 748 3.2 600 3.0
 Yogyakarta 812 6.6 752 6.6
Food Expenditures
 Rice Lowest 8,184 55.1 7,058 54.3
 Rice Highest 7,442 44.9 6,469 45.7
 Cooking Oil Lowest 9,404 61.6 8,257 62.0
 Cooking Oil Highest 6,220 38.4 5,268 38.0
Mean Family Size
 ≤ 4 9,846 64.9 8,471 63.3
 > 4 5,802 35.1 5,094 36.7
Behavioral Risk Factors
Smoking Status
 Does Not Smoke 15,119 96.3 4,421 32.8
 Currently Smoking 447 3.7 9,077 67.2
Physical Activity (Last Week)d
 Vigorous Activity 1,558 10.8 4,668 38.0
 Moderate Activity 8,696 58.1 6,844 54.1
 Walking 10,051 68.8 9,298 72.4
Diet (Last Week)
 Consumed Instant Noodle 9,567 59.8 8,479 63.4
 Consumed Fast Food 1,647 8.9 1,246 8.7
 Consumed Soda 1,859 10.6 3,153 22.2
 Consumed Fried Snacks 9,472 65.3 8,483 68.8
Health Indicators
Hypertensione 4,168 35.8 3,472 29.9
Central Obesityf 4,555 66.2 1,575 23.9
Type 2 Diabetesg 315 11.6 226 8.9
Elevated hs-CRPh 774 21.4 403 14.9
Comorbid Conditionsi 2,947 60.0 1,908 36.4
Medicine for Hypertensionj 575 5.1 274 2.5
Medicine for Type 2 Diabetesj 194 1.7 142 1.3

hs-CRP = high sensitivity c-reactive protein

a Percentages are weighted to be representative of the population of Indonesia during a given survey year. Missings: education (women n = 2,971, men n = 2,772); marital status (women n = 4, men n = 5); employment (women n = 269, men n = 241); residence (women n = 0, men n = 2); wealth (women n = 3,981, men n = 2,377); province (women n = 897, men n = 816); food expenditures rice (women n = 22, men n = 40); food expenditures oil (women n = 25, men n = 42); family size (women n = 0, men n = 2); smoking (women n = 82, men n = 69).

b Skilled manual labor combines the following employment sectors: mining, manufacturing, electric, gas, water maintenance, and construction

c Skilled labor combines the following employment sectors: retail and service, transportation

d Defined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

e Systolic and diastolic blood pressure are based on the average of three measurements. Hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm or current use of antihypertensive medication.

f Measured only among adults ≥ 40 years old. Specific to populations in South Asia: central obesity is defined as waist circumference ≥ 90 cm if male and waist circumference ≥ 80 cm if female

g Defined as HbA1C ≥ 6.5%

h Defined as hs-CRP > 3 mg/dL

i Comorbidity is defined as the coexistence of any two (or more) of the following conditions: hypertension, central obesity, type 2 diabetes, elevated hs-CRP

j Self-reported medication use

Approximately 60–70% of adults reported regularly consuming instant noodles and fried snacks. Approximately one-quarter of men regularly consumed soda, but relatively few adults consumed fast food (< 10%). About 40% of men were vigorously active, compared to only 10.8% of women. A majority of adults were moderately active (~55%). Approximately 30% of men and women were hypertensive. Women had a higher prevalence of elevated hs-CRP (women: 21.4%, men: 14.9%), central obesity (women: 66.2%, men: 23.9%) and diabetes (women: 11.6%, men: 8.9%). Among women, 60.0% had two (or more) of the following conditions: hypertension, central obesity, type 2 diabetes, elevated hs-CRP. Comorbidities were also prevalent among men (36.4%). Few adults (≤5%) reported taking medication for hypertension or diabetes.

Fig 1 summarizes all associations between hypothesized risk factors and chronic disease-related outcomes in multivariable models.

Fig 1. Summary of associations between selected characteristics and chronic disease among adults in multivariable models.

Fig 1

--not applicable. Associated with higher odds of chronic disease outcome. Associated with lower odds of chronic disease outcome.

Hypertension

Among women, older age and being overweight were associated with higher odds of hypertension (Table 2). Conversely, higher educational attainment (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.67; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.48, 0.94) was associated with lower odds of hypertension. Being employed in agriculture-based labor (OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.80) or skilled labor were also associated with lower odds of hypertension (OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.84).

Table 2. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and hypertension among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

Womena,b Mena,b
N = 8,854 N = 8,745
Individual Level Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Age (in years)
 19–29 Reference Reference
 30–39 2.65 (2.06, 3.41) * 1.19 (0.89, 1.59)
 40–49 6.48 (5.02, 8.35) * 2.69 (2.00, 3.62) *
 50–59 13.94 (10.64, 18.26) * 4.45 (3.28, 6.04) *
 ≥ 60 23.05 (16.99, 31.28) * 9.48 (6.87, 13.09) *
Education
 No Education Reference
 Primary 1.09 (0.85, 1.39) 1.04 (0.72, 1.50)
 Junior or Senior 0.86 (0.66, 1.13) 0.94 (0.63, 1.39)
 University 0.67 (0.48, 0.94) * 1.04 (0.66, 1.62)
Marital Status
 Never Married Reference Reference
 Married 1.13 (0.70, 1.84) 0.75 (0.54, 1.04)
 Other 1.22 (0.72, 2.09) 1.00 (0.59, 1.72)
Employment
 Not Working Reference Reference
 Agriculture-based Labor 0.66 (0.54, 0.80) * 0.65 (0.48, 0.87) *
 Skilled Manual Laborc 0.81 (0.63, 1.03) 0.71 (0.52, 0.97) *
 Skilled Labord 0.72 (0.62, 0.84) * 0.70 (0.53, 0.94) *
Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2)
 No Reference Reference
 Yes 2.11 (1.85, 2.40) * 2.77 (2.33, 3.30) *
Smoking Status
 Does not smoke Reference Reference
 Currently Smoking 1.08 (0.75, 1.57) 0.82 (0.70, 0.96) *
Physical Activity (Last Week)e:
 No Vigorous Activity Reference
 Vigorous Activity --- 0.83 (0.71, 0.98) *
 No Moderate Activity Reference Reference
 Moderate Activity 0.94 (0.82, 1.07) 0.92 (0.79, 1.07)
Consumed (Last Week):
 Instant Noodles
  No Reference Reference
  Yes 0.98 (0.85, 1.12) 1.01 (0.86, 1.18)
 Fast Food
  No Reference Reference
  Yes 1.09 (0.87, 1.38) 0.97 (0.73, 1.29)
 Soda
  No Reference Reference
  Yes 0.94 (0.76, 1.16) 1.03 (0.85, 1.25)
Household Level
Residence
 Rural Reference Reference
 Urban 1.05 (0.92, 1.21) 1.00 (0.85, 1.18)
Wealth
 Lowest Reference Reference
 Second 0.96 (0.79, 1.15) 0.82 (0.66, 1.01)
 Middle 0.99 (0.81, 1.21) 0.90 (0.71, 1.13)
 Fourth 0.96 (0.79, 1.16) 0.84 (0.67, 1.06)
 Highest 0.89 (0.73, 1.09) 0.80 (0.64, 1.02)
Family Size
 ≤ 4 Reference
 > 4 0.92 (0.81, 1.05) ---

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval

a Systolic and diastolic blood pressure are based on the average of three measurements. Hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm or current use of antihypertensive medication

b Odds ratios and confidence intervals are estimated using logistic regression and are weighted to account for the survey design. Models exclude women who are currently pregnant.

c Skilled manual labor combines the following employment sectors: mining, manufacturing, electric, gas, water maintenance, and construction

d Skilled labor combines the following employment sectors: retail and service, transportation

e Defined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

* p < 0.05

Men who were aged ≥ 40 years (versus 19–29 years old) had an approximately 3- to 9-fold higher odds of hypertension. Being overweight (OR = 2.77; 95% CI: 2.33, 3.30) was associated with higher odds of hypertension. Smoking (versus not smoking) (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70, 0.96) was associated with lower odds of hypertension among men. Being employed in agriculture-based labor (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.87), skilled manual labor (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.97) or skilled labor (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.94) were also associated with lower odds of hypertension.

Elevated hs-CRP

Overweight (OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.67, 3.51) and urban (versus rural) residence (OR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.31) predicted elevated hs-CRP among women (Table 3). Every additional day women consumed instant noodles was associated with 12% higher odds of elevated hs-CRP (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25).

Table 3. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and elevated hs-CRP among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

Womena,b Mena,b
N = 1,055 N = 453
Individual Level Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Age (in years)
 19–29 --- Reference
 30–39 --- 1.30 (0.51, 3.29)
 40–49 --- 1.18 (0.43, 3.23)
 50–59 --- 0.58 (0.15, 2.30)
 ≥ 60 --- 1.50 (0.52, 4.35)
Education
 No Education Reference
 Primary 1.15 (0.46, 2.87) ---
 Junior or Senior 0.93 (0.37, 2.32) ---
 University 0.70 (0.24, 2.03) ---
Marital Status
 Never Married Reference Reference
 Married 2.35 (0.96, 5.74) 1.46 (0.53, 4.02)
 Other 0.51 (0.15, 1.74) 5.01 (0.80, 31.17)
Employment
 Not Working Reference
 Agriculture-based Labor 0.60 (0.32, 1.11) 1.66 (0.49, 5.70)
 Skilled Manual Laborc 0.45 (0.21, 0.93) * 0.69 (0.19, 2.47)
 Skilled Labord 0.97 (0.64, 1.49) 1.28 (0.38, 4.26)
Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2)
 No Reference Reference
 Yes 2.42 (1.67, 3.51) * 2.26 (1.19, 4.30) *
Physical Activity (Last Week)e:
 No Vigorous Activity Reference Reference
 Vigorous Activity 0.66 (0.37, 1.18) 0.63 (0.35, 1.12)
Consumed (Last Week):
 Fast Food
  No Reference
  Yes 1.04 (0.59, 1.83) ---
Mean Number of Days Consumed Last Weekf:
 Instant Noodles 1.12 (1.01, 1.25) * ---
 Soda --- 1.32 (1.10, 1.58) *
Household Level
Residence
 Rural Reference Reference
 Urban 1.51 (1.00, 2.31) * 1.49 (0.78, 2.86)
Wealth
 Lowest Reference Reference
 Second 1.05 (0.60, 1.84) 1.34 (0.53, 3.43)
 Middle 0.84 (0.47, 1.51) 1.24 (0.44, 3.46)
 Fourth 0.90 (0.52, 1.56) 0.47 (0.18, 1.25)
 Highest 0.75 (0.43, 1.32) 1.22 (0.51, 2.91)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval; hs-CRP = high sensitivity c-reactive protein

a Defined as hs-CRP ≥ 3

b Odds ratios and confidence intervals are estimated using logistic regression and are weighted to account for the survey design. Models exclude women who are currently pregnant.

c Skilled manual labor combines the following employment sectors: mining, manufacturing, electric, gas, water maintenance, and construction

d Skilled labor combines the following employment sectors: retail and service, transportation

e Defined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

f Modelled as a continuous variable, the average number of days consumed is queried if the respondent reported that they consumed in the last week (i.e. these models exclude non-consumers).

* p < 0.05

Among men, being overweight was associated with more than 2-fold higher odds of elevated hs-CRP (OR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.19, 4.30). Every additional day men consumed soda was associated with 32% higher odds of elevated hs-CRP (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.58).

Central obesity

Older women and those with higher educational attainment had higher odds of central obesity (Table 4). Unexpectedly, moderate physical activity (versus no activity) was associated with higher odds of central obesity, among women (OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.39). Higher household expenditures on cooking oil (versus lower expenditures) (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.60) and urban residence (OR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.26, 1.77) also predicted higher odds of central obesity. But working in agriculture-based employment (versus unemployment) was associated with lower odds of central obesity (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.75), as was smoking (versus non-smoking) (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.91).

Table 4. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and central obesity among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

Womena,b Mena,b
N = 4,061 N = 4,523
Individual Level Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Age (in years)
 40–49 Reference Reference
 50–59 1.23 (1.02, 1.47) * 1.26 (1.04, 1.52) *
 ≥ 60 1.01 (0.80, 1.27) 0.88 (0.69, 1.12)
Education
 No Education Reference Reference
 Primary 1.65 (1.28, 2.12) * 1.63 (0.97, 2.76)
 Junior or Senior 1.88 (1.40, 2.53) * 2.42 (1.41, 4.15) *
 University 1.81 (1.22, 2.68) * 3.27 (1.84, 5.82) *
Marital Status
 Never Married Reference
 Married 1.46 (0.54, 3.95) ---
 Other 1.25 (0.45, 3.49) ---
Employment
 Not Working Reference Reference
 Agriculture-based Labor 0.60 (0.48, 0.75) * 0.42 (0.31, 0.58) *
 Skilled Manual Laborc 0.88 (0.64, 1.22) 0.55 (0.39, 0.76) *
 Skilled Labord 1.11 (0.91, 1.35) 1.01 (0.75, 1.35)
Smoking Status
 Does not smoke Reference Reference
 Currently Smoking 0.62 (0.43, 0.91) * 0.60 (0.51, 0.71) *
Physical Activity (Last Week)e:
 No Vigorous Activity Reference Reference
 Vigorous Activity 0.81 (0.63, 1.04) 0.78 (0.64, 0.94) *
 No Moderate Activity Reference
 Moderate Activity 1.18 (1.01, 1.39) * ---
 No Walking Reference
 Walking 0.91 (0.76, 1.09) ---
Consumed (Last Week):
 Fast Food
  No Reference Reference
  Yes 1.07 (0.77, 1.49) 1.28 (0.91, 1.80)
 Soda
  No Reference
  Yes --- 1.32 (1.07, 1.64) *
 Fried Snacks
  No Reference Reference
  Yes 1.03 (0.88, 1.22) 1.17 (0.98, 1.39)
Household Level
Food Expendituresf
 Cooking oil Lowest Reference Reference
 Cooking oil Highest 1.36 (1.16, 1.60) * 1.12 (0.95, 1.32)
Residence
 Rural Reference Reference
 Urban 1.49 (1.26, 1.77) * 1.28 (1.06, 1.55) *
Wealth
 Lowest Reference Reference
 Second 1.02 (0.81, 1.28) 1.08 (0.85, 1.37)
 Middle 1.18 (0.92, 1.52) 1.02 (0.78, 1.34)
 Fourth 1.00 (0.78, 1.27) 0.95 (0.74, 1.23)
 Highest 1.11 (0.88, 1.42) 1.14 (0.88, 1.47)

CI = confidence interval

a Measured among adults ≥ 40 years old. Defined as waist circumference ≥ 90 cm if male and waist circumference ≥ 80 cm if female

b Odds ratios and confidence intervals are estimated using logistic regression and are weighted to account for the survey design. Models exclude women who are currently pregnant.

c Skilled manual labor combines the following employment sectors: mining, manufacturing, electric, gas, water maintenance, and construction

d Skilled labor combines the following employment sectors: retail and service, transportation

e Defined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

f Indicates the household level expenditure on each item as a percentage of the households’ total expenditures on food

* p < 0.05

Similarly, among men, older age (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.52), higher educational attainment (OR = 3.27; 95% CI: 1.84, 5.82) and urban residence (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.55) predicted higher central obesity, as did soda consumption (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.64). On the contrary, smoking (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.71) and vigorous physical activity (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.94) were associated with lower odds of central obesity, as was working in agriculture-based employment (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.58) and skilled manual labor (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.76).

Type 2 diabetes

Among women, being aged ≥ 40 years (versus 19–29 years old) was associated with a 3- to 8-times higher odds of diabetes (Table 5). Being overweight was associated with 2.5-fold higher odds of diabetes (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.73, 3.75).

Table 5. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and Type 2 diabetes among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

Womena,b Mena,b
N = 2,045 N = 1,596
Individual Level Odds Ratio (95% CI) Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Age (in years)
 19–29 Reference Reference
 30–39 2.90 (0.96, 8.70) 5.45 (0.89, 33.50)
 40–49 4.53 (1.56, 13.19) * 6.88 (0.92, 51.39)
 50–59 7.50 (2.69, 20.93) * 10.66 (1.53, 74.33) *
 ≥ 60 8.09 (2.86, 22.87) * 14.59 (4.65, 45.80) *
Education
 No Education Reference
 Primary --- 4.89 (1.07, 22.31) *
 Junior or Senior --- 5.71 (1.18, 27.66) *
 University --- 6.66 (1.24, 35.74) *
Marital Status
 Never Married
 Married --- 0.50 (0.09, 2.73)
 Other --- 0.43 (0.05, 3.64)
Employment
 Not Working Reference
 Agriculture-based Labor --- 0.56 (0.28, 1.12)
 Skilled Manual Laborc --- 0.59 (0.27, 1.27)
 Skilled Labord --- 0.89 (0.48, 1.63)
Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2)
 No Reference Reference
 Yes 2.54 (1.73, 3.75) * 5.10 (3.21, 8.10) *
Smoking Status
 Does not smoke Reference
 Currently Smoking --- 1.18 (0.76, 1.82)
Physical Activity (Last Week)e:
 No Vigorous Activity Reference
 Vigorous Activity --- 0.60 (0.35, 1.05)
 No Moderate Activity Reference
 Moderate Activity --- 0.72 (0.47, 1.11)
Consumed (Last Week):
 Instant Noodles
  No Reference
  Yes 0.92 (0.64, 1.32) ---
 Soda
  No Reference
  Yes 0.62 (0.32, 1.21) ---
Household Level
Residence
 Rural Reference Reference
 Urban 1.30 (0.91, 1.87) 0.98 (0.61, 1.56)
Wealth
 Lowest Reference Reference
 Second 1.09 (0.66, 1.82) 1.77 (0.96, 3.28)
 Middle 1.69 (0.97, 2.96) 1.09 (0.54, 2.19)
 Fourth 1.34 (0.78, 2.27) 1.46 (0.74, 2.91)
 Highest 1.20 (0.69, 2.08) 1.32 (0.63, 2.78)

BMI = body mass index, CI = confidence interval

a Defined as HbA1c ≥ 6.5%

b Odds ratios and confidence intervals are estimated using logistic regression and are weighted to account for the survey design. Models exclude women who are currently pregnant.

c Skilled manual labor combines the following employment sectors: mining, manufacturing, electric, gas, water maintenance, and construction

d Skilled labor combines the following employment sectors: retail and service, transportation

e Defined using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire

* p < 0.05

Compared to men aged 19–29 years, being ≥ 30 years old was associated with 5- to 15-fold higher odds of diabetes. Being overweight was associated with 5-fold higher odds of diabetes (OR = 5.10; 95% CI: 3.21, 8.10). Compared to men with no education, having a primary (OR = 4.89; 95% CI: 1.07, 22.31), junior/senior (OR = 5.71; 95%: 1.18, 27.66) or university education (OR = 6.66; 95%: 1.24, 35.74) was also associated with higher odds of diabetes.

Overall, results were similar in magnitude, direction, and statistical significance when overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2. Unlike our main findings, when defining overweight as BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2, higher wealth was associated with lower odds of hypertension, among men (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.99) (S5 Table). In sensitivity analyses, overweight (defined as BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) was not associated with elevated hs-CRP, among men (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.87, 3.05) (S6 Table).

Discussion

Large segments of the adult population in Indonesia now have or are at risk for NCDs. Key metabolic determinants in the progression to CVD, including hypertension, elevated hs-CRP, and central obesity, as well as type 2 diabetes, were prevalent. About 20% of adults were hypertensive in 2014. At the same time, one-fifth of the adult population had elevated hs-CRP. Of particular concern were the very high prevalence of central obesity among women (~70%) and, compared to global estimates, a relatively high prevalence of diabetes among women: 11.5%. Older-age and being overweight were consistently associated with chronic disease-related health. Urban area residence (versus rural) was associated with elevated hs-CRP (women) and central obesity (women and men). Consuming instant noodles (women) and soda (men) were associated with elevated hs-CRP and soda consumption was associated with higher central obesity among men. On the contrary, vigorous physical activity was associated with lower odds of central obesity among men.

Higher odds of hypertension were observed among older and overweight adults in this sample. Higher education was associated with lower odds of hypertension among women, as was being employed (versus non-employed) among both women and men. These findings are generally consistent with prior studies conducted in Indonesia [4651] and Asia [52], which suggest social determinants play a role in the development of hypertension.

Being overweight, living in urban area, and an unhealthful diet were associated with higher odds of elevated hs-CRP, in this sample. These factors are all inter-related; urban-area residence results in an increased consumption of unhealthy foods and decreased physical activity, which are associated with higher overweight [36,5355]. In turn, being overweight is a well-established risk factor for elevated hs-CRP [56]. For example, in a seminal U.S.-based study, obese men were 2-times as likely and obese women 6-times as likely to have elevated CRP levels [56]. Relatively few studies have explored the determinants of elevated hs-CRP in lower-income countries, but a strong association between obesity and hs-CRP has also been reported among adults in Jamaica [57] and among Filipinos [58]. Both hypertension and elevated hs-CRP were associated with CVD [59,60] and elevated hs-CRP is associated with higher diabetes risk [61].

Similar to prior studies in Asia [6264], the prevalence of central obesity was very high among women (~70%), compared to only 24% among men. In multivariable models, age, education, and urban residence were associated with higher odds of central obesity, while agriculture-based employment and smoking were associated with lower odds of central obesity. One other Indonesian study also suggested that physical labor was related to lower central obesity among older-aged adults [63] and agriculture-based employment was associated with lower odds of overweight among women across 40 lower-income countries [65]. Central obesity is associated with higher mortality risk [66] and higher CVD among Asians [67]. Notably, Asians tend to develop CVD and diabetes with a lower BMI than individuals in other regions, due in part to their propensity to store adipose tissue around their waist [45,68]. Therefore, it is especially important to consider the prevalence of central obesity in this population, which could suggest that the risk for NCDs among women is more widespread than previously thought [69,70].

Findings from these analyses also indicate larger portions of women (versus men) have diabetes; this is similar to the 2013 National Health Survey, which found 10.1% of women and 7.3% of men were diabetic [16,71]. Prevalence estimates from this sample are higher than estimates from the NCD Risk Factor Collaboration study for women, which reported that the global prevalence of diabetes was 7.9% [72]. High diabetes prevalence in Indonesia suggests that there may be Southeast Asia-specific risk factors to consider. In addition to the aforementioned risk of diabetes with lower BMIs, physiological responses to food could vary between populations. For example, the glucose response in Asians is higher than Caucasians in the U.S. [73]. In this sample, older age, being overweight, and higher education (among men) were associated with higher odds of diabetes. This is consistent with prior studies that show that age induces a decrease of insulin sensitivity and/or insulin resistance [74] and that age is associated with a higher odds of diabetes prevalence, using regression-based methods [52,75]. This is also consistent with 2007 data, which found that age and obesity were associated with diabetes in Indonesia [76]. In multivariable models, higher education has also previously been associated with diabetes in Asia [52].

Consuming instant noodles and soda were associated with elevated hs-CRP and central obesity. Some associations between an unhealthy diet and hs-CRP and central obesity, as well as the consistent associations between overweight and hypertension, elevated hs-CRP, and type 2 diabetes in these analyses, suggests that the nutrition transition has played a major role in these trends. There have been marked changes in Indonesia’s food system and a reduction in energy expenditure. More calories are now available, with an estimated 20% coming from fat [70], in part due to the ubiquitous use of vegetable-based cooking oils, that are high in trans- and saturated fats. Higher caloric intake has been associated with weight gain and the consumption of trans fats, which has been associated with increased cardiometabolic risk (51) and insulin resistance (52). Individual-level data from this sample echo trends from macro-level data, as about 60% of adults in this sample reported regularly consuming fried snacks. In addition, polished rice and refined wheat, which are high glycemic index foods, form the basis of many Indonesians’ diets; consuming high glycemic index foods is associated with a 2-fold increased risk of diabetes [77]. In addition, by one account, Indonesians are consuming 15 grams of salt per day, which is about 3-times the recommended amount [78], and strongly related to hypertension risk [24,25].

Although there were not consistent associations between physical activity and NCD-related outcomes, vigorous physical activity was associated with lower odds of central obesity among men. Some prior studies from Indonesia have also reported no associations between physical activity and hypertension [50] and between activity and central obesity, in samples that pool men and women [79]. Contrary to findings reported in these analyses, results from a robust meta-analysis, which largely includes data from high-income countries, reports that physical activity is strongly related to hypertension [80]. Physical activity has also been associated with insulin sensitivity in Indonesia [76] and reduced incidence of diabetes [8183] in prior studies. Overall, the literature and findings from this study suggest that interventions that promote healthful eating and physical activity, in order to reduce the prevalence of NCDs, warrant consideration in Indonesia.

Notably, very few respondents reported taking medication for hypertension or diabetes. This could suggest that these adults are undiagnosed and/or do not have regular access to health care [84]. One prior study suggests that approximately 70% of all diabetes cases in Indonesia remain undiagnosed [85]. The Government has undertaken several WHO-recommended initiatives designed to strengthen the primary healthcare system, including implementing coverage and service delivery reforms under Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, the national health insurance plan [86]. But current evidence suggests that prevention and management of diet-related NCDs remain a challenge [21,8690].

Study limitations warrant consideration. Due to our study design, we cannot establish temporality or rule out unmeasured or residual confounding. Diet and physical activity data are self-reported and only capture a limited picture of the consumption of ultra-processed foods and physical activities. Results for hs-CRP and HbA1C are estimated using DBS, therefore, these results may not be comparable to those that that involve assay results from venous blood. In addition, we examine the risk factors for a single outcome in separate models, and this does not provide information on risk factors for co-morbidities (e.g. co-existing hypertension and diabetes).

Conclusions

We find a relatively high prevalence of nutrition-related chronic diseases among Indonesians. Moreover, overweight was consistently associated with hypertension, hs-CRP, and diabetes. These findings provide preliminary empirical evidence that interventions that target healthful food intake (e.g. reduce the intake of ultra-processed foods) and physical activity should be considered and that the reduction of overweight is critical for preventing chronic diseases in Indonesia. Future studies should investigate risk factors for co-morbidities.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and hypertension among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and elevated hs-CRP among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and central obesity among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and Type 2 diabetes among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and hypertension among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and elevated hs-CRP among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and Type 2 diabetes among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Paul Pronyk for his insightful comments on the manuscript.

Data Availability

Data are publicly available at: https://www.rand.org/well-being/social-and-behavioral-policy/data/FLS/IFLS.html.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death [Internet]. 2018 [cited 16 Mar 2019]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
  • 2.World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles: Indonesia [Internet]. 2018 [cited 9 Apr 2019]. https://www.who.int/nmh/countries/idn_en.pdf
  • 3.International Diabetes Federation. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas [Internet]. 2017 [cited 16 Mar 2019]. http://www.diabetesatlas.org/across-the-globe.html
  • 4.Soegondo S, Widyahening IS, Istiantho R, Yunir E. Prevalence of diabetes among suburban population of ternate-a small remote island in the eastern part of Indonesia. Acta Med Indones. 2011;43: 99–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mboi N, Surbakti IM, Trihandini I, Elyazar I, Smith KH, Ali PB, et al. On the road to universal health care in Indonesia, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392: 581–591. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30595-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The World Bank Group. Indonesia—Current expenditure on health [Internet]. 2015 [cited 9 Apr 2019]. https://knoema.com/atlas/Indonesia/topics/Health/Health-Expenditure/Expenditure-on-health
  • 7.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Indonesia Health Data [Internet]. 2017 [cited 9 Apr 2019]. http://countrystudies.us/indonesia/57.htm
  • 8.Bloom DE, Chen S, McGovern ME, Prettner K, Candeias V, Bernaert A, et al. Economics of non-communicable diseases in Indonesia. Geneva: World Economic Forum and Harvard School of Public Health; 2015. pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, Cozma AI, Ha V, Kishibe T, et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 2015;351: h3978 10.1136/bmj.h3978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cook NR, Obarzanek E, Cutler JA, Buring JE, Rexrode KM, Kumanyika SK, et al. Joint effects of sodium and potassium intake on subsequent cardiovascular disease: the Trials of Hypertension Prevention follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169: 32–40. 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, Flanders WD, Merritt R, Hu FB. Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174: 516–524. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Manson JE, Willett WC, Meigs JB, Weikert C, et al. Dietary pattern, inflammation, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82: 675–684. 10.1093/ajcn.82.3.675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84: 274–288. 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, Cornaby L, Ferrara G, Salama JS, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019; 393(10184):1958–1972. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Trieu K, Neal B, Hawkes C, Dunford E, Campbell N, Rodriguez-Fernandez R, et al. Salt reduction initiatives around the world–a systematic review of progress towards the global target. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2015;10: e0130247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The National Institute of Health Research and Development. National report on basic health research, RISKESDAS 2013. Jakarta, Indonesia; 2014.
  • 17.Center for Disease Control Research and Development;, NIHRD Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, World Health Organization. Monitoring and Evaluation of the Integrated Community-Based Intervention for the Prevention of NCD in Depok, West Java, Indonesia. 2006.
  • 18.Batcagan-Abueg APM, Lee JJM, Chan P, Rebello SA, Amarra MSV. Salt intakes and salt reduction initiatives in Southeast Asia: a review. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2013;22: 683–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dhaliwal SS, Welborn TA. Central obesity and multivariable cardiovascular risk as assessed by the Framingham prediction scores. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103: 1403–1407. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, Gregg EW, Yang W, Gong Q, et al. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 20-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008;371: 1783–1789. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60766-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schröders J, Wall S, Hakimi M, Dewi FST, Weinehall L, Nichter M, et al. How is Indonesia coping with its epidemic of chronic noncommunicable diseases? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2017;12: e0179186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shrimpton R, Rokx C. The double burden of malnutrition in Indonesia [Internet]. Jakarta, Indonesia; 2013. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17007
  • 23.Widjojo S, Sunawang, Ljungqvist B, Sukotjo S, Torlesse H, Cronin A, et al. UNICEF Health Sector Review Indonesia. Jakarta; 2014.
  • 24.Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP, Meerpohl JJ. Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ. 2013;346: f1326 10.1136/bmj.f1326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med. 2001;344: 3–10. 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma J, McKeown NM, Hwang S-J, Hoffmann U, Jacques PF, Fox CS. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption is associated with change of visceral adipose tissue over 6 years of follow-up. Circulation. 2016;133: 370–377. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang D-H, et al. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86: 899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mazidi M, Kengne AP, Mikhailidis DP, Cicero AF, Banach M. Effects of selected dietary constituents on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in US adults. Ann Med. 2018;50: 1–6. 10.1080/07853890.2017.1325967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De Koning L, Malik VS, Kellogg MD, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sweetened beverage consumption, incident coronary heart disease, and biomarkers of risk in men. Circulation. 2012;125: 1735–1741. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360: 1903–1913. 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roberts WL. CDC/AHA workshop on markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: laboratory tests available to assess inflammation—performance and standardization: a background paper. Circulation. 2004;110: e572–e576. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148986.52696.07 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Strauss J, Witoelar F, Sikoki B. The fifth wave of the Indonesia family life survey: overview and field report. RAND St Monica, CA, USA. 2016;
  • 33.Monteiro CA, Moubarac J, Cannon G, Ng SW, Popkin B. Ultra‐processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev. 2013;14: 21–28. 10.1111/obr.12107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fiolet T, Srour B, Sellem L, Kesse-Guyot E, Allès B, Méjean C, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. BMJ. 2018;360: k322 10.1136/bmj.k322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mendonça R de D, Pimenta AM, Gea A, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Lopes ACS, et al. Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104: 1433–1440. 10.3945/ajcn.116.135004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, de Castro IRR, Cannon G. Increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods and likely impact on human health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14: 5–13. 10.1017/S1368980010003241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, Cai H, Cassimatis T, Chen KY, et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metab. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Crimmins E, Kim JK, McCreath H, Faul J, Weir D, Seeman T. Validation of blood-based assays using dried blood spots for use in large population studies. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2014;60: 38–48. 10.1080/19485565.2014.901885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Herningtyas EH, Hu P, Edenfield M, Strauss J, Crimmins E, Witoelar F, et al. IFLS Wave 5 Dried Blood Spot Data User Guide. St Monica RAND; 2018; [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hu P, Edenfield M, Potter A, Kale V, Risbud A, Williams S, et al. Validation and modification of dried blood spot‐based glycosylated hemoglobin assay for the longitudinal aging study in India. Am J Hum Biol. 2015;27: 579–581. 10.1002/ajhb.22664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Pr. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71: e127–e248. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289: 2560–2571. 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome [Internet]. 2006 [cited 20 Mar 2019]. https://www.idf.org/e-library/consensus-statements/60-idfconsensus-worldwide-definitionof-the-metabolic-syndrome.html
  • 44.Gillett MJ. International expert committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes: diabetes care 2009; 32 (7): 1327–1334. Clin Biochem Rev. 2009;30: 197 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363: 157 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Christiani Y, Byles JE, Tavener M, Dugdale P. Assessing socioeconomic inequalities of hypertension among women in Indonesia’s major cities. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29: 683 10.1038/jhh.2015.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ng N, Stenlund H, Bonita R, Hakimi M, Wall S, Weinehall L. Preventable risk factors for noncommunicable diseases in rural Indonesia: prevalence study using WHO STEPS approach. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84: 305–313. 10.2471/blt.05.023721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Helble M, Aizawa T. Urbanization and inequality in hypertension diagnosis and medication in Indonesia. ADBI Working Paper 556; 2016;
  • 49.Widjaja FF, Santoso LA, Barus NRV, Pradana GA, Estetika C. Prehypertension and hypertension among young Indonesian adults at a primary health care in a rural area. Med J Indones. 2013;22: 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Peltzer K, Pengpid S. The prevalence and social determinants of hypertension among adults in Indonesia: A cross-sectional population-based national survey. Int J Hypertens. 2018;2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pengpid S, Peltzer K, Rachmi CN, Agho KE, Li M, Baur LA, et al. Tackling Obesity in Asean: Prevalence, Impact, and Guidance on Interventions. PLoS One. 2017;11: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Theilmann M, Davies JI, Awasthi A, Vollmer S, et al. Diabetes and hypertension in India: a nationally representative study of 1.3 million adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178: 363–372. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Popkin BM. Urbanization, lifestyle changes and the nutrition transition. World Dev. 1999;27: 1905–1916. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mendez MA, Monteiro CA, Popkin BM. Overweight exceeds underweight among women in most developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81: 714–721. 10.1093/ajcn/81.3.714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jaacks LM, Slining MM, Popkin BM. Recent underweight and overweight trends by rural-urban residence among women in low- and middle-income countries. J Nutr. American Society for Nutrition; 2015;145: 352–357. 10.3945/jn.114.203562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener MH, Harris TB. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA. 1999;282: 2131–2135. 10.1001/jama.282.22.2131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bennett NR, Ferguson TS, Bennett FI, Tulloch-Reid MK, Younger-Coleman NOM, Jackson MD, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is related to central obesity and the number of metabolic syndrome components in Jamaican young adults. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2014;1: 12 10.3389/fcvm.2014.00012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.McDade TW, Rutherford JN, Adair L, Kuzawa C. Adiposity and pathogen exposure predict C-reactive protein in Filipino women. J Nutr. 2008;138: 2442–2447. 10.3945/jn.108.092700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumley A, et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350: 1387–1397. 10.1056/NEJMoa032804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P, et al. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000;321: 199–204. 10.1136/bmj.321.7255.199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286: 327–334. 10.1001/jama.286.3.327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hu L, Huang X, You C, Li J, Hong K, Li P, et al. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, abdominal obesity and obesity-related risk factors in southern China. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0183934 10.1371/journal.pone.0183934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pujilestari C, Nyström L, Norberg M, Ng N. Waist Circumference and All-Cause Mortality among Older Adults in Rural Indonesia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16: 116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rachmi CN, Li M, Baur LA. Overweight and obesity in Indonesia: prevalence and risk factors—a literature review. Public Health. 2017;147: 20–29. 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Oddo VM, Bleich SN, Pollack KM, Surkan PJ, Mueller NT, Jones-Smith JC. The weight of work: the association between maternal employment and overweight in low-and middle-income countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14: 66 10.1186/s12966-017-0522-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sahakyan KR, Somers VK, Rodriguez-Escudero JP, Hodge DO, Carter RE, Sochor O, et al. Normal-weight central obesity: implications for total and cardiovascular mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163: 827–835. 10.7326/M14-2525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. Central obesity and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific Region. 2006. [PubMed]
  • 68.Yoon K-H, Lee J-H, Kim J-W, Cho JH, Choi Y-H, Ko S-H, et al. Epidemic obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asia. Lancet. 2006;368: 1681–1688. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69703-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Aekplakorn W, Bunnag P, Woodward M, Sritara P, Cheepudomwit S, Yamwong S, et al. A risk score for predicting incident diabetes in the Thai population. Diabetes Care. 2006;29: 1872–1877. 10.2337/dc05-2141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Economist Intelligence Unit. Tackling obesity in ASEAN Prevalence, Impact, and Guidance on Interventions [Internet]. 2017. https://foodindustry.asia/documentdownload.axd?documentresourceid=30157.
  • 71.Idris H, Hasyim H, Utama F. Analysis of diabetes mellitus determinants in Indonesia: a study from the Indonesian Basic Health Research 2013. Acta Med Indones. 2017;49: 291–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387: 1513–1530. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Venn BJ, Williams SM, Mann JI. Comparison of postprandial glycaemia in Asians and Caucasians. Diabet Med. 2010;27: 1205–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Meneilly GS, Elliott T. Metabolic alterations in middle-aged and elderly obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22: 112–118. 10.2337/diacare.22.1.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Anna V, van der Ploeg HP, Cheung NW, Huxley RR, Bauman AE. Sociodemographic correlates of the increasing trend in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in a large population of women between 1995 and 2005. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: 2288–2293. 10.2337/dc08-1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mihardja L, Manz HS, Ghani L, Soegondo S. Prevalence and determinants of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in Indonesia (a part of basic health research/Riskesdas). Acta Med Indones. 2009;41: 169–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pan X-R, Yang W-Y, Li G-W, Liu J. Prevalence of diabetes and its risk factors in China, 1994. Diabetes Care. 1997;20: 1664–1669. 10.2337/diacare.20.11.1664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.World Health Organisation. Expert Meeting on Population Sodium Reduction Strategies for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in the South-East Asia Region [Internet]. New Delhi, India; 2013. http://www.searo.who.int/entity/ noncommunicable_diseases/documents/sea_ncd_86/en/.
  • 79.Harbuwono DS, Pramono LA, Yunir E, Subekti I. Obesity and central obesity in Indonesia: evidence from a national health survey. Med J Indones. 2018;27: 114–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Huai P, Xun H, Reilly KH, Wang Y, Ma W, Xi B. Physical activity and risk of hypertension: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Hypertension. 2013;62: 1021–1026. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Manson JE, Nathan DM, Krolewski AS, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of exercise and incidence of diabetes among US male physicians. JAMA. 1992;268: 63–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Helmrich SP, Ragland DR, Leung RW, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1991;325: 147–152. 10.1056/NEJM199107183250302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mayer-Davis EJ, D’Agostino R Jr, Karter AJ, Haffner SM, Rewers MJ, Saad M, et al. Intensity and amount of physical activity in relation to insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1998;279: 669–674. 10.1001/jama.279.9.669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Soewondo P, Ferrario A, Tahapary DL. Challenges in diabetes management in Indonesia: a literature review. Global Health. 2013;9: 63 10.1186/1744-8603-9-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Pramono LA, Setiati S, Soewondo P, Subekti I, Adisasmita A, Kodim N, et al. Prevalence and predictors of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Indonesia. Age (Omaha). 2010;46: 100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.World Health Organization. Primary health care systems (PRIMASYS): case study from Indonesia. Geneva; 2017.
  • 87.The World Bank Group. Indonesia–Supporting Primary Healthcare Reform Project : Technical assessment. Washington, D.C; 2018.
  • 88.Mendis S, Abegunde D, Yusuf S, Ebrahim S, Shaper G, Ghannem H, et al. WHO study on Prevention of REcurrences of Myocardial Infarction and StrokE (WHO-PREMISE). Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83: 820–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Rahman ARA, Wang J-G, Kwong GMY, Morales DD, Sritara P, Sukmawan R. Perception of hypertension management by patients and doctors in Asia: potential to improve blood pressure control. Asia Pac Fam Med. 2015;14: 2 10.1186/s12930-015-0018-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Adriono G, Wang D, Octavianus C, Congdon N. Use of eye care services among diabetic patients in urban Indonesia. Arch Ophthalmol. American Medical Association; 2011;129: 930–935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and hypertension among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and elevated hs-CRP among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and central obesity among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Univariate Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and Type 2 diabetes among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and hypertension among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and elevated hs-CRP among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

S7 Table. Multivariable Logistic Regression Testing the association between selected characteristics and Type 2 diabetes among adults in Indonesia, 2014.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

Data are publicly available at: https://www.rand.org/well-being/social-and-behavioral-policy/data/FLS/IFLS.html.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES