Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Lab Invest. 2019 Apr 24;99(9):1376–1388. doi: 10.1038/s41374-019-0259-0

Dynamic signature of lymphangiogenesis during AKI and CKD

Abolfazl Zarjou 1,2, Laurence M Black 1,2, Subhashini Bolisetty 1,2, Amie M Traylor 1,2, Sarah A Bowhay 1,2, Ming-Zhi Zhang 3,4, Raymond C Harris 3,5,6, Anupam Agarwal 1,2,7
PMCID: PMC6716993  NIHMSID: NIHMS1525860  PMID: 31019289

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are interconnected syndromes with significant attributable morbidity and mortality. The disturbing trend of increasing incidence and prevalence of these clinical conditions highlights the urgent need for better understanding of the underlying mechanisms that are involved in pathogenesis of these conditions. Lymphangiogenesis and its involvement in various inflammatory conditions is increasingly recognized while its role in AKI and CKD remains to be fully elucidated. Here, we studied lymphangiogenesis in three models of kidney injury. Our results demonstrate that the main ligands for lymphangiogenesis, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, are abundantly present in tubules at baseline conditions and the expression pattern of these ligands is significantly altered following injury. In addition, we show that both of these ligands increase in serum and urine post-injury and suggest that such increment may serve as novel urinary biomarkers of AKI as well as in progression of kidney disease. We also provide evidence that irrespective of the nature of initial insult, lymphangiogenic pathways are rapidly and robustly induced as evidenced by higher expression of lymphatic markers within the kidney.

Keywords: Lymphangiogenesis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, VEGF-C, VEGF-D

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, developing in about 5–7% of hospitalized patients and impairing recovery in 15–25% of those in intensive care units [1–3]. Additionally, AKI is linked to the subsequent development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) [4–6]. Lack of significant progress in the development of therapeutic interventions that are directed at both AKI and CKD highlights the urgent need for further delineation of pathways involved in the pathogenesis of these clinical conditions.

Despite its recognition since the ancient Greeks, the lymphatic vasculature was nearly impossible to study until about three decades ago because it was almost indistinguishable from the blood vessels. However, several pioneering studies changed this paradigm and led to an enhanced understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of lymphangiogenesis (LA). Moreover, it is now evident that LA commonly occurs in various disease states. The discovery of selective hyperplasia of the lymphatic vasculature in the skin via overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) is regarded as the first major development towards deciphering the lymphatic system [7]. This work also demonstrated that VEGF-C mainly exerts its function through VEGF-R3 (FLT-4), a tyrosine kinase receptor. This was followed by the discovery of several other markers that are predominately expressed by lymphatic endothelial cells. These include mucin type transmembrane glycoprotein podoplanin [8], and lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) [9]. Furthermore, prosperorelated homeobox transcription factor-1 (Prox-1) was demonstrated as a specific and required regulator for lymphatic system development [10]. Collectively, these discoveries have enabled precise and more in depth studying of the development of lymphatics in both health and disease.

The classic functions of the lymphatic system include maintenance of tissue fluid homeostasis, lipid absorption, and immune surveillance [11]. However, numerous studies have now shown that the lymphatic system also plays a vital role in the process of inflammation, characterized by increased vascular permeability, excess fluid accumulation, debris buildup, as well as migration and activation of leukocytes [12]. While little is known about the association and correlation between kidney disease and lymphangiogenesis, the anatomical architecture of renal lymphatics under physiological circumstances has been well described. Renal lymph vessels enter and follow a similar path of branching to renal arteries and veins. Accordingly, under normal conditions very few lymphatic vessels are present in cortical and medullary interstitial space. The lymphatic capillaries play a crucial role by collecting and transporting interstitial fluid and macromolecules into lymphatic precollectors that follow the arcuate and interlobar vessels into hilar collector lymphatics that eventually drain into the thoracic duct that empties into the left subclavian vein [13, 14]. The functions of the lymphatic system are further accentuated during inflammation, which is a key component of AKI and the AKI to CKD transition. Inflammation induces LA through expression of VEGFs, particularly VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and their receptor VEGF-R3 [15–17]. It has been shown that there is a clear link between LA and a number of inflammatory diseases including tumor metastasis, chronic airway infection, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, corneal injury, wound healing, Crohn’s disease, transplant rejection, and inflammatory bowel disease [12, 18, 19].

There are very few studies on LA in kidney diseases (most recent findings reviewed by Yazdani and colleagues) [14] and no work to date on LA in the context of AKI. This gap in knowledge prompted us to examine the course of LA during AKI and CKD in three different models of kidney disease.

Materials and Methods

Study Approval

All procedures involving mice were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines regarding the care and use of live animals and were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Alabama at Birmingham and Vanderbilt University.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury

Age matched male (9 weeks at the time of delivery and 10 weeks old at the time of surgery) C57BL/6 were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Renal I/R injury was performed as described previously with minor modifications [20]. Briefly, mice (10–12 weeks old males) were anesthetized with ketamine xylazine, and following incision, both renal pedicles were cross clamped for 20 minutes using an atraumatic vascular clamp (catalog #18055–05; Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA). Immediate blanching of the kidney confirmed ischemic induction. Body temperature was maintained at 37°C during surgery and ischemia time. Kidneys were inspected for color change within 1 min of clamp removal to ensure uniform reperfusion.

High dose (HD) and repeated low dose (RLD) cisplatin administration

Cisplatin was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). For the high dose (HD) model, aged matched C57BL/6 male mice (10–12 weeks of age) were administered cisplatin (1.0 mg/ml solution in sterile normal saline) at 20 mg/kg body weight by a single intraperitoneal injection as previously described [21, 22]. These animals were sacrificed 72 hours after injection. For the repeated low dose (RLD) model, age-matched C57BL/6 male mice (10–12 weeks of age) were briefly anesthetized with isoflurane, and 9 mg/kg body wt cisplatin (1.0 mg/ml solution in sterile 0.9% saline) were administered intraperitoneally once a week for 4 wk, adapted from Sharp et al. and Black et al. [23, 24].

Diphtheria toxin (DT) administration and AKI

All the details regarding generation of transgenic mice that selectively express the human DT-receptor in proximal tubules, dose and route of DT administration to induce AKI, renal function and other information have been reported previously [25].

Renal function measurements

Serum creatinine levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry at the University of Alabama at Birmingham-University of California, San Diego O’Brien Center for Acute Kidney Injury Research bioanalytical core facility by previously described methods [26].

Western blot analysis

Tissues and cells were homogenized and protein was isolated, as described previously [22]. Briefly, kidneys and cells were lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM/l Tris·HCl, 5 mM/l EDTA, 150 mM/l NaCl, 10% Nonidet P-40, and 10% Triton-X) with protease (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and phosphatase (Biotool, Houston, TX) inhibitors. Total protein was quantified with the bichinchoninic acid protein assay (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). Protein (50 ug) was resolved on 12% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (EMB Millipore, Billerica, MA). Membranes were blocked according to manufacturer’s protocol (5% nonfat dry milk in PBST) for 1 hour and then incubated with a goat anti-VEGFR-3 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; 1:200), a rabbit anti-VEGF-D antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; 1:2500), a mouse anti-VEGF-C antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; 1:1000), or a rabbit anti-Prox-1 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; 1:200) followed by a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (or mouse) IgG antibody or donkey anti-goat IgG antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA; 1:5000). Horseradish peroxidase activity was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare) or KiwkQuant detection system (Kindle Biosciences, Greenwich, CT). The membrane was stripped and probed with anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; 1:5000) to confirm loading and transfer. Densitometry analysis was performed and results were normalized to GAPDH expression.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described.[27] Briefly, mouse kidneys were fixed with 10% formalin solution and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer-thick sections were prepared, deparaffinized with xylene, and then rehydrated in water through graded ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed in a pressure cooker in Tris-EDTA solution, pH 9.0, for 20 min. Nonspecific staining in the sections was blocked by incubation in a blocking buffer (1% bovine serum albumin, 0.2% non-fat dry milk, 300 μl of Triton-X in 100 ml of PBS) for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with a goat anti-VEGFR-3 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; 1:50), a rabbit anti-VEGF-D antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA; 1:200), or a mouse anti-VEGF-C antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Houston, TX; 1:200) overnight at 4°C. Incubation of rabbit or mouse or goat secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, Texas red or Alexa Fluor 594 (30 min at room temperature; 1:100–1:200 dilution, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) was subsequently done after washes. As a control, unrelated appropriate IgG antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Houston) were used, followed by species specific secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, Texas red or Alexa Fluor 594, under the same conditions. The images were taken by Leica DMIRB epifluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, IL, USA) using Image PRO 5.1 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc, MD, USA) or a Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) Images were captured on a BZ-X700 All-In-One Fluorescence Microscope (Keyence, Istasca, IL).

To quantify the number of VEGF-R3 positive vessels each kidney section obtained from one individual mouse was carefully evaluated under 20X magnification and the numbers were recorded for each section and data presented as number of VEGF-R3 vessels/section.

Picrosirius red stain

Kidneys were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h then embedded in paraffin. Tissues were stained with periodic acid-Schiff hematoxylin using standard protocols. Fibrosis was visualized and measured using picrosirius red (PSR). Sections were deparaffinized in xylene washes and rehydrated, incubated in PSR for 1 h, washed in acidified water, and dehydrated. Sections were mounted in a resinous medium. All images were acquired on a BZ-X700 All-In-One Fluorescence Microscope (Keyence, Istasca, IL). Four to six random fields were selected from each section for digital quantification (n=3/group). Images were acquired at 10X magnification. Percent area positive and intensity (integrated density) of PSR stain were measured using the “Triangle” autothreshold method in FIJI version 1.51n. Color, brightness, and contrast adjustments were made in an identical manner for matched sections.

Quantification of mRNA expression

Gene expression analysis was performed, as previously described [22]. Briefly, total RNA was isolated from tissues using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Reactions were performed in triplicate and monitored using melting curve analysis. Relative mRNA expression was quantified using comparative threshold cycle method and normalized to GAPDH mRNA as an internal control. Primers used to detect the specific genes included the following: VEGF-R3, fwd: 5’-CCATCGAGAGTCTGGACAGC-3’ and VEGF-R3, rev: 5’-CCGGGATGGTGGTCACATAG-3’; Prox-1, fwd: 5’- GAAGGGCTATCACCCAATCA-3’ and Prox-1, rev: 5’- TGAACCACTTGATGAGCTGC-3’; VEGF-C, fwd: 5’- AGACGGACACACATGGAGGT-3’ and VEGF-C, rev: 5’-AAAGACTCAATGCATGCCAC-3’; VEGF-D, fwd: 5’- CTGCTCGGATCTGTTGTTCA-3’ and VEGF-D, rev: 5’- GTGTACTTGGTGCAGGGCTT-3’; Lyve-1, fwd: 5’-GGCTTTGAGACTTGCAGCTATG-3’ and Lyve-1, rev: 5’-GCAGGAGTTAACCCAGGTGT-3’; podoplanin, fwd: 5’-CTCAAGCTTCAAGATGTGGACCGTGCCAGT-3’ and podoplanin, rev: 5’-GAGGAATTCGGGCGAGAACCTTCCAGAAAT-3’.

Cell culture

Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) were isolated from C57BL/6 mice (10–12 weeks of age), as previously described, with minor modifications [28]. Briefly, cells were flushed from bones and passed through a 40 μm cell strainer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and red blood cells were lysed in ACK lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA). Cells were plated in DMEM (Corning Cellgro, Corning, NY) containing 15% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA), 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD), 30 ng/mL MCSF (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). BMDMs were cultured for 6 days before lysis and protein isolation. Primary proximal tubular cells (PTC) cultures were generated from the kidneys of C57BL/6 mice (10–12 weeks of age) using a previously described procedure [29]. Briefly, kidney cortices from mice were dissected from the medulla, sliced, minced, and filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer over a 50-ml conical tube with media (Renal Epithelial Cell Growth Medium; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany). The medium containing the tubules was centrifuged and plated on collagen-coated culture plates and then incubated for 72 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2. Each experiment required PTC or BMDM generated from a single animal and cells were not passaged.

ELISA

ELISA analyses for VEGF-C (Cloud-Clone Corp., Atlanta, GA) and VEGF-D (My BioSource, San Diego, CA) were performed on serum or urine following the manufacturer’s instructions. Urine creatinine was measured by LC-MS/MS [26]. VEGF-C data were expressed as nanograms per milliliter and VEGF-D data as picograms per milliliter. Urine data were normalized to urine creatinine and expressed as nanograms or picograms per milligram creatinine for VEGF-C and VEGF-D, respectively. Per manufactures’ manual, both VEGF-C and VEGF-D ELISA kits are highly sensitive and specific with no cross-reactivity with other factors. The reported intra-assay and inter-assay variability for VEGF-C ELISA kit is reported at <10% and <12%, respectively. The reported intra-assay and inter-assay variability for VEGF-D ELISA kit is reported at <8% and <12%, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired 2-tailed t-test was used for comparisons between two groups. ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests were used for comparisons between more than two groups. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.

Results

Ischemia/reperfusion model to induce AKI and CKD

To investigate LA in the context of both AKI and CKD, we first used ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) as a well-established model of AKI and the subsequent development of CKD. Following I/R, renal function was assessed by measuring serum creatinine at 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28 days post injury and compared to baseline levels. As expected, serum creatinine was markedly elevated at 1 day post-I/R and gradually decreased towards baseline (Figure 1A). We also assessed the extent of fibrosis and collagen deposition by picosiruis red staining. As shown in Figure 1B and C, collagen deposition increased following injury and was highest by days 14 and 28.

Figure 1. Renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) induces kidney injury and subsequent fibrosis.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

(A) Serum creatinine levels were measured and expressed as milligrams/deciliter at baseline and on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28 following I/R. Data are expressed as means ± SEM; *P < 0.05 vs baseline. (B) Picrosirius red stain demonstrating collagen deposition at various time points following injury. (C) Quantification of collagen deposition by measuring intensity of picrosirius stain encompassing positive staining areas above threshold. Data are expressed as means ± SEM; *P < 0.05 vs baseline. Scale bar= 200μm.

I/R induced kidney injury stimulates dynamic changes in inducers and markers of lymphangiogenesis

We next determined the kidney mRNA levels of VEGF-C and VEGF-D, which are known to be central ligands in stimulation of LA. The levels of both these ligands significantly increased following injury. VEGF-C levels gradually increased over time and were significant at days 14 and 28. In contrast, VEGF-D levels were significantly higher on day 3 (Figure 2). Other markers of LA including VEGF-R3, LYVE-1 and podoplanin showed a trend of increased expression compared to baseline at various time-points (Figure 2). However, significant variability among samples was noted, likely reflecting the scattered distribution of the lymphatics within the renal parenchymal tissue. In addition, Prox-1, the central transcription factor that is required for neo-LA, was significantly suppressed at the RNA level on day 3 post injury followed by a significant increase on day 14 (Figure 2). These results mimic previous findings that investigated cardiac LA following myocardial infarction [30]. We then examined the renal protein expression of VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-R3 and Prox-1 by Western blotting. Renal expression of both VEGF-C and VEGF-D decreased over time while VEGF-R3 and Prox-1 increased following injury (Figure 3A and B). Conversely, expression levels of VEGF-R3 and Prox-1 were significantly higher compared to baseline at day 3 (Figure 3B).

Figure 2. I/R induces expression of ligands and markers involved in lymphangiogenesis (LA).

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Total RNA was isolated from kidneys at baseline and different time points after I/R mediated kidney injury and analyzed for the expression of VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-R3, LYVE-1, podoplanin and prox-1. Results were normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold change relative to baseline controls. Data are expressed as means ± SEM; *P < 0.05 vs baseline.

Figure 3. Protein levels of LA ligands and markers are upregulated following I/R induced injury.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

(A) Protein expression level of VEGF-R3, prox-1, VEGF-D and VEGF-C was verified by Western blot. Blots were stripped and probed for GAPDH. (B) Expression of the indicated proteins in the kidneys was analyzed by densitometry, normalized to GAPDH, and expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs baseline. (C, E) Serum was collected at indicated time points and levels of VEGF-C (panel C) and VEGF-D (panel E) were measured by ELISA and data expressed as nanogram per milliliter or picogram per milliliter, respectively. (D, F) Urine was collected at the time of sacrifice via bladder puncture and evaluated for levels of VEGF-C (panel D) and VEGF-E (panel F). Results were then normalized to urine creatinine levels and expressed as nanogram per milligram and picogram per milligram creatinine for VEGF-C and VEGF-D, respectively. Results expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs baseline.

The aforementioned results led us to hypothesize that the decrement in the level of parenchymal VEGF-C and VEGF-D protein expression is reflective of their secretion into the interstitium, circulation and/or urine. To confirm this, we performed ELISA to quantify serum and urinary levels of VEGF-C and VEGF-D following injury. Both VEGF-C and VEGF-D increased significantly in the serum post injury compared to baseline (Figure 3C, E). Serum levels of VEGF-C were significantly higher on days 1, 14 and 28 and VEGF-D on days 1, 7 and 14 after injury. Interestingly, both VEGF-C and VEGF-D levels were significantly elevated in the urine following injury (Figure 3D, F). These results indicate that the ligands required for induction of LA are available at baseline and rapidly secreted either through active secretory pathways or via direct release following injury to the cell.

Expression patterns of VEGF-C and VEGF-D change following I/R induced injury

We next investigated the expression patterns of VEGF-C and VEGF-D at baseline and following I/R injury. We found that almost all tubules within the cortex and outer medulla were positive for both VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression which further corroborates that these ligands are pre-synthesized and secreted upon injury to promptly stimulate LA (Figure 4A). At baseline, the expression was homogeneous in renal tubules and localized predominantly to the cytoplasmic compartment. Following injury, however, the pattern was altered. On day 1 following injury, VEGF-C was mainly localized on the basolateral surface while VEGF-D was found in the luminal portion of the tubules. It must be noted that our IgG controls demonstrate similar luminal staining on day 1 which likely represents non-specific staining of luminal cellular debris/casts. By day 7, several regenerating tubules were positive for both VEGF-C and VEGF-D with predominant basolateral staining. Such heterogeneous and patchy patterns of staining remained evident at days 14 and 28 (Figure 4A). We hypothesize that the changes in distribution of both VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression may highlight the loss of polarity of tubular epithelial cells following injury and/or may reflect an active process of secretion into the interstitium and lumen. These speculations would require additional future studies for confirmation.

Figure 4. I/R mediated injury changes the pattern of VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression and induces expression of VEGF-R3.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

(A) Mice were sacrificed at indicated time points and kidney sections were prepared and immunofluorescence assays were performed using anti-VEGF-C and anti-VEGF-D antibodies to determine the pattern of expression of these proteins. DAPI was used to stain nuclei. Images are representative of five independent experiments. Scale bar= 50 μm. (B) Kidneys sections were stained using anti-VEGF-R3 antibody. For better demonstration only the indicated time-points are shown. Scale bar= 50 μm. (C) Quantification of VEGF-R3 positive vessels was performed as described in methods. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline.

To visualize the dynamic proliferation of lymphatic vessels post injury, we stained kidney sections for VEGF-R3. Very few lymphatics were positive for VEGFR-3 at baseline and these were predominantly localized adjacent to the renal artery and vein at the hilum (data not shown). Starting on day 3, significantly higher numbers of VEGF-R3 positive lymphatic vessels were visualized that continued to increase until day 28 (Figure 4B). These positively stained lymphatics were manually counted per section and results presented in Figure 4C demonstrate progression of LA following I/R-induced injury.

Evaluation of lymphangiogenesis in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

Since I/R entails clamping of the renal pedicle and includes the renal artery, vein and associated lymphatics that run parallel to them, we sought to corroborate that the robust LA observed following I/R is not merely due to mechanical damage inflicted during the clamping procedure. Hence, we utilized another well-established model of kidney injury induced by the administration of cisplatin in the context of both AKI and CKD. To this end a single injection of 20 mg/kg of cisplatin was used to induce AKI (high dose, HD), while repeated dosing of 9 mg/kg of cisplatin was administered once a week for 4 weeks to induce CKD (repeated low dose, RLD) as previously reported [23, 24]. For the AKI studies, tissues were harvested at 72h post injury, while CKD studies were terminated at 28 days. To investigate the expression pattern of ligands required in cisplatin nephrotoxicity, we stained kidneys with VEGF-C and VEGF-D following cisplatin and compared them to baseline (Figure 5A). Such comparison (although less prominent when compared to I/R) revealed more basolateral staining of VEGF-C in both AKI and CKD models. In contrast, high dose cisplatin led to increase in VEGF-D luminal staining. Moreover, injury resulted in a less uniform pattern of expression with tubules demonstrating variable intensity that likely reveals replenishing stores and regeneration following injury (Figure 5A). We next examined the serum and urinary levels of major ligands of LA, VEGF-C and VEGF-D by ELISA. As shown in Figure 6 A–D levels of both VEGF-C and VEGF-D were significantly higher in serum and urine in the repeated low dose cisplatin model. Serum VEGF-D levels however were not significantly different between high dose cisplatin and baseline (Figure 6C). Furthermore, we did not detect any urinary VEGF-D at baseline (Figure 6D).

Figure 5. Cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity alters tubular VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression pattern.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

(A) As described in methods section, mice were sacrificed at 3 days post HD and 24 days following RLD cisplatin administration. Kidney sections were prepared and immunofluorescence staining was performed using anti-VEGF-C and anti-VEGF-D antibodies. Images are representative of five independent experiments. Scale bar= 50 μm.

Figure 6. Serum and urinary levels of VEGF-C and VEGF-D increase following cisplatin injury.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

(A, C) Mice were sacrificed at 3 days post HD and 24 days post RLD cisplatin administration. VEGF-C (panel A) and VEGF-D (panel C) levels in the serum were measured by ELISA and expressed as nanogram per milliliter and picogram per milliliter, respectively. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline. (B, D) Urine was collected via bladder puncture at the time of sacrifice and ELISA was used to measure VEGF-C and VEGF-D levels. Results were then normalized to urine creatinine levels and expressed as nanogram per milligram and picogram per milligram creatinine for VEGF-C and VEGF-D, respectively. Results expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs baseline.

To quantify and better understand the progression of LA following cisplatin nephrotoxicity, we examined VEGF-R3 expression and found that at baseline kidneys displayed few lymphatics, which were confined to the hilum. However, cisplatin induced robust LA as evidenced by the number of new vessels positive for VEGF-R3 in both high dose and repeated low dose groups (Figure 7A). These positive vessels were counted per section and the quantified results are shown in Figure 7B.

Figure 7. VEGF-R3 expression increases in response to cisplatin nephrotoxicity.

Figure 7.

Open in a new tab

(A) Kidney sections at 3 days post HD and 24 days post RLD administration were stained with anti-VEGF-R3 antibody as described in methods section. Images are representative of five independent experiments. Scale bar= 50 μm. (B) Results demonstrate quantification of number of VEGF-R3 positive vessels/kidney section. Results expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs baseline.

Induction of lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice expressing human diphtheria toxin (DT) receptor in proximal tubules

While many mammals are sensitive to diphtheria toxin (DT), rodents are about 100 times more resistant, since DT does not bind to their heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) which is also the DT-receptor [31]. To further validate our initial findings, we next took advantage of a novel model of AKI in which transgenic mice express DT-receptor in proximal tubules [25]. Administration of DT results in marked elevation of BUN and apoptosis in these mice as previously reported [25]. Despite the different approach to induce AKI, both VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression within tubules closely resembled I/R and cisplatin induced kidney injury (Figure 8A). Accordingly, significant basolateral staining for these ligands was observed in DT treated mice compared to baseline. This model did not reveal significant luminal VEGF-D staining which may be a result of the time of sacrifice which occurred following 8 days of DT administration. Additionally, we found significantly higher number of VEGF-R3 positive lymphatic vessels in DT treated mice compared to baseline that again highlights robust induction of renal LA irrespective of mode of kidney injury (Figure 8B, C).

Figure 8. DT induced proximal tubular injury affects expression of LA ligands and leads to induction of LA.

Figure 8.

Open in a new tab

(A) DT was administered to transgenic mice with selective expression of DT-receptor in proximal tubules and kidneys were harvested. Kidney sections were prepared and immunofluorescence staining was performed using anti-VEGF-C and anti-VEGF-D antibodies. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Images are representative of at least five independent experiments. Scale bar= 50 μm. (B) Kidney sections were stained with anti-VEGF-R3 antibody and nuclei were stained with DAPI. (C) Each stained kidney section was carefully evaluated to quantify the number of lymphatic vessels staining positive for VEGF-R3 and data was expressed as VEGF-R3 vessels per section. Images are representative of at least five independent experiments. Scale bar= 50 μm. Results expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05

Tubules contribute to both VEGF-C and VEGF-D production while macrophages only express VEGF-C

It has been previously shown that both macrophages and renal tubules express VEGF-C that likely presents a major source of this ligand during injury associated LA. Here, we cultured proximal tubules (PTC) and bone marrow derived macrophages (Mφ) and examined their expression of these ligands. As shown by Western blotting in Figure 9A, it is evident that while both of these cell types robustly express VEGF-C at basal conditions, only PTC contribute to VEGF-D production. We confirmed these findings by staining kidneys with DT-induced injury as well as from spleens from mice at baseline conditions (Figure 9B). It must be noted that the very intense staining of VEGF-C in renal Mφ required us to decrease the intensity of staining to better depict these Mφ at expense of tubules.

Figure 9. Tubular cells are major source of VEGF-D while both macrophages and tubules contribute to VEGF-C production.

Figure 9.

Open in a new tab

(A) PTC and BMDM were harvested and their proteins were examined for VEGF-C and VEGF-D content via Western blotting. (B) Spleen and kidneys were stained for VEGF-C and VEGF-D. Immunofluorescence staining reveals macrophages that only express VEGF-C and renal tubules that express both VEGF-C and VEGF-D. Images are representative three independent experiments. Scale bar= 50 μm.

Discussion

The results of this work demonstrate that the main ligands involved in LA, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, are abundantly present in renal tubules at baseline and are secreted following injury. Lymphatic vessel formation is robustly induced following kidney injury and such induction is independent of the nature of insult. Our results also indicate that while both macrophages and renal tubules actively participate in secretion of VEGF-C and its subsequent contribution towards LA, VEGF-D is only produced by renal tubular cells and not from macrophages. In addition, we demonstrate significantly higher urinary levels of both VEGF-C and VEGF–D following injury, suggesting that these factors may serve as biomarkers of LA in the setting of kidney injury. The observed changes in the staining pattern, expression of both mRNA and protein levels following injury substantiates the pivotal relationship between induction of lymphangiogenesis in response to injury. However, future mechanistic studies are required to decipher whether such changes occur at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional or post-translational level.

Inflammation induced LA could be considered an adaptive and beneficial response following injury as it would aid in clearance of debris, removal of pro-inflammatory cytokines, migration of regulatory T cells, and drainage of excess fluid. In contrast, LA during inflammation may also be regarded as a potentially harmful response since it could facilitate in the migration of leukocytes to the site of injury with subsequent exacerbation of inflammation. There is also evidence indicating that lymphatic endothelial cells can secrete cytokines to maintain the inflammatory environment. Inflammation induced LA is beneficial in certain conditions such as myocardial infarction [30], polycystic kidney disease [32], lung transplantation [33], and others [14]. However, LA can also be harmful in the setting of corneal transplantation [34, 35], diabetes [36, 37], and tumor metastasis (reviewed in [38, 39]).

Very little is currently known about LA in the pathophysiology of kidney diseases, particularly in the context of AKI and CKD. However, there have been several recent studies on LA in the setting of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) that have shed some light on this process [40–43]. These studies revealed an increase in the number of lymphatic vessels in the kidney after UUO. LA was promoted in the kidneys via increased VEGF-C and –D protein expression stimulated at least in part by TGF-β [42, 43]. While these studies have provided important insights regarding the mechanisms involved in renal LA, utilization of the UUO model may not be the ideal model to study these changes. This is particularly true when considering the role of lymphatics in fluid reabsorption and the fact that UUO leads to significant urinary retention, hence confounding the precise nature of the initiating and maintaining factors leading to LA. Other studies have also implicated LA in renal transplant rejection. One study showed that nearly all end stage renal allografts had increased lymphatic vessel density likely contributing to the chronic renal allograft failure [44]. In addition, rat models of kidney allograft rejection show improved outcomes when LA is blocked after transplantation [45]. Inflammation induced LA has also been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease [14] and renal cancer [46, 47]. Lymphatic drainage and lymphatic contents from the injured kidney arriving at the systemic circulation and regional lymph nodes may provide a hitherto unrecognized pathway whereby the injured kidney may elicit adverse distant effects on organs such as heart, lungs, and brain, especially as the morbidity and mortality of AKI result largely from adverse effects on these distant, vital organs. Such distant cross-talk may be mediated via increased levels of circulating ligands promoting lymphangiogenesis (VEGF-C and VEFG-D). Hence, it would be interesting for future studies to examine potentially increased lymphangiogenesis in other major organs following AKI or during CKD.

To provide a more comprehensive understanding of the mediators and processes that orchestrate LA during kidney injury, our studies first focused on the initiation and progression of LA in I/R induced kidney injury. As demonstrated, we found upregulation of lymphatic markers and secretion of both VEGF-C and VEGF-D in serum and urine post-injury. An interesting aspect of these findings is the marked elevation of both VEGF-C and VEGF-D in urine samples of mice with I/R mediated injury and cisplatin nephrotoxicity. We postulate that this increase may be due to release of these ligands either through an active secretion process or merely the result of the breakdown of cellular barriers. While VEGF has previously been shown to be a potentially reliable urinary biomarker of AKI [48], to the best of our knowledge this is the first description of specific isoforms VEGF-C and VEGF-D in this context. These results may provide not only a novel biomarker of injury but will also offer a window into the dynamics of renal LA during injury.

To eliminate mechanical injury to the lymphatics due to clamping and subsequent injury to the main lymphatic vessels that enter the renal hilum during the ischemia phase, we were prompted to investigate LA during cisplatin nephrotoxicity. We found that similar to I/R mediated injury, cisplatin nephrotoxicity resulted in increase of urinary and serum VEGF-C and VEGF-D (although VEGF-D was only significantly higher in low-dose group). Such discrepancies in VEGF-D secretion may be a function of time (AKI vs CKD) as well as severity of injury. Moreover, expression of VEGF-R3, used as a marker of LA, was significantly higher in both low and high dose cisplatin groups. We were also able to corroborate these findings in a model of DT–induced selective injury to the renal proximal tubule that has previously been described [25]. While our findings demonstrate robust induction of renal LA independent of the mode of injury, we acknowledge that future studies are required to determine the functional significance of LA in the setting of AKI and CKD and provide additional mechanistic insights. As alluded to earlier, the currently existing literature describing LA during kidney injury only involves the role of LA in UUO models. However, the essential contributing role of lymphatics in interstitial fluid reabsorption is a major limiting factor in full interpretation of these findings in the context of AKI and CKD where UUO is followed by marked parenchymal swelling and interstitial edema. Therefore, despite limitations in the context of functional significance, our findings provide important novel information that identifies neo-LA as an integral ensuing component of kidney injury that occurs irrespective of mode of injury. Whether LA would be an adaptive or maladaptive response to injury and inflammation during AKI and CKD would be a subject of future investigation.

In conclusion, we provide evidence that LA is induced during AKI and CKD. These results will likely provide a strong foundation to better study the lymphatic network in renal pathologies. We propose that timely targeting of this delicate and well-regulated pathway will allow future therapeutics to challenge AKI, interstitial fibrosis and ultimately prevent CKD.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the technical assistance of Kayla McCullough and Yanlin Jiang. This work was supported by NIH grants (1K08HL140294 to A. Zarjou, 5K01DK103931 to S. Bolisetty, DK062794, DK95785 and DK114809 to R. Harris and M. Zhang), VA Merit Award 1I01BX004047 to A. Agarwal, the core resource of the UAB-UCSD O’Brien Center (P30 DK079337 to A. Agarwal).

Footnotes

Disclosures

All the authors declare no competing interests.

References:

  • 1.Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S, et al. Spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: the PICARD experience. Kidney Int. 2004;66(4):1613–1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zarjou A, Sanders PW, Mehta RL, et al. Enabling innovative translational research in acute kidney injury. Clinical and translational science. 2012;5(1):93–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Caestecker M, Harris R. Translating Knowledge Into Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury. Semin Nephrol. 2018;38(1):88–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chawla LS, Eggers PW, Star RA, et al. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. The New England journal of medicine. 2014;371(1):58–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chawla LS, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: an integrated clinical syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82(5):516–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Waikar SS, Liu KD, Chertow GM. The incidence and prognostic significance of acute kidney injury. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2007;16(3):227–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jeltsch M, Kaipainen A, Joukov V, et al. Hyperplasia of lymphatic vessels in VEGF-C transgenic mice. Science. 1997;276(5317):1423–1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, et al. Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am J Pathol. 1999;154(2):385–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Banerji S, Ni J, Wang SX, et al. LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan. J Cell Biol. 1999;144(4):789–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wigle JT, Oliver G. Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell. 1999;98(6):769–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maby-El Hajjami H, Petrova TV. Developmental and pathological lymphangiogenesis: from models to human disease. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;130(6):1063–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim H, Kataru RP, Koh GY. Inflammation-associated lymphangiogenesis: a double-edged sword? J Clin Invest. 2014;124(3):936–942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seeger H, Bonani M, Segerer S. The role of lymphatics in renal inflammation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(7):2634–2641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yazdani S, Navis G, Hillebrands JL, et al. Lymphangiogenesis in renal diseases: passive bystander or active participant? Expert reviews in molecular medicine. 2014;16:e15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dieterich LC, Seidel CD, Detmar M. Lymphatic vessels: new targets for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Angiogenesis. 2014;17(2):359–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tammela T, Alitalo K. Lymphangiogenesis: Molecular mechanisms and future promise. Cell. 2010;140(4):460–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim H, Kataru RP, Koh GY. Regulation and implications of inflammatory lymphangiogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2012;33(7):350–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alitalo K, Tammela T, Petrova TV. Lymphangiogenesis in development and human disease. Nature. 2005;438(7070):946–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ji RC. Lymphatic endothelial cells, inflammatory lymphangiogenesis, and prospective players. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(22):2359–2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hull TD, Kamal AI, Boddu R, et al. Heme Oxygenase-1 Regulates Myeloid Cell Trafficking in AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(9):2139–2151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zarjou A, Kim J, Traylor AM, et al. Paracrine effects of mesenchymal stem cells in cisplatin-induced renal injury require heme oxygenase-1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;300(1):F254–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zarjou A, Bolisetty S, Joseph R, et al. Proximal tubule H-ferritin mediates iron trafficking in acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4423–4434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sharp CN, Doll MA, Dupre TV, et al. Repeated administration of low-dose cisplatin in mice induces fibrosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;310(6):F560–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Black LM, Lever JM, Traylor AM, et al. Divergent effects of AKI to CKD models on inflammation and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2018;315(4):F1107–F1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang MZ, Yao B, Yang S, et al. CSF-1 signaling mediates recovery from acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(12):4519–4532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takahashi N, Boysen G, Li F, et al. Tandem mass spectrometry measurements of creatinine in mouse plasma and urine for determining glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int. 2007;71(3):266–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zarjou A, Yang S, Abraham E, et al. Identification of a microRNA signature in renal fibrosis: role of miR-21. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;301(4):F793–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bolisetty S, Zarjou A, Hull TD, et al. Macrophage and epithelial cell H-ferritin expression regulates renal inflammation. Kidney Int. 2015;88(1):95–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bolisetty S, Traylor AM, Kim J, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 inhibits renal tubular macroautophagy in acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(10):1702–1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Klotz L, Norman S, Vieira JM, et al. Cardiac lymphatics are heterogeneous in origin and respond to injury. Nature. 2015;522(7554):62–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mitamura T, Higashiyama S, Taniguchi N, et al. Diphtheria toxin binds to the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain of human heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor/diphtheria toxin receptor and inhibits specifically its mitogenic activity. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(3):1015–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huang JL, Woolf AS, Kolatsi-Joannou M, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C for Polycystic Kidney Diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(1):69–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cui Y, Liu K, Monzon-Medina ME, et al. Therapeutic lymphangiogenesis ameliorates established acute lung allograft rejection. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(11):4255–4268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dietrich T, Bock F, Yuen D, et al. Cutting edge: lymphatic vessels, not blood vessels, primarily mediate immune rejections after transplantation. J Immunol. 2010;184(2):535–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ling S, Qi C, Li W, et al. Crucial role of corneal lymphangiogenesis for allograft rejection in alkali-burned cornea bed. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(9):874–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moriguchi P, Sannomiya P, Lara PF, et al. Lymphatic system changes in diabetes mellitus: role of insulin and hyperglycemia. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005;21(2):150–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yin N, Zhang N, Lal G, et al. Lymphangiogenesis is required for pancreatic islet inflammation and diabetes. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e28023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sleeman JP, Thiele W. Tumor metastasis and the lymphatic vasculature. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(12):2747–2756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stacker SA, Baldwin ME, Achen MG. The role of tumor lymphangiogenesis in metastatic spread. FASEB J. 2002;16(9):922–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guo YC, Zhang M, Wang FX, et al. Macrophages Regulate Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction-Induced Renal Lymphangiogenesis through C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 2-Dependent Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-AKT-Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Signaling and Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1alpha/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(8):1736–1749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hasegawa S, Nakano T, Torisu K, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C ameliorates renal interstitial fibrosis through lymphangiogenesis in mouse unilateral ureteral obstruction. Lab Invest. 2017;97(12):1439–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee AS, Lee JE, Jung YJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C and -D are involved in lymphangiogenesis in mouse unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int. 2013;83(1):50–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suzuki Y, Ito Y, Mizuno M, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta induces vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression leading to lymphangiogenesis in rat unilateral ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int. 2012;81(9):865–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Adair A, Mitchell DR, Kipari T, et al. Peritubular capillary rarefaction and lymphangiogenesis in chronic allograft failure. Transplantation. 2007;83(12):1542–1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Palin NK, Savikko J, Koskinen PK. Sirolimus inhibits lymphangiogenesis in rat renal allografts, a novel mechanism to prevent chronic kidney allograft injury. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. 2013;26(2):195–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Horiguchi A, Ito K, Sumitomo M, et al. Intratumoral lymphatics and lymphatic invasion are associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2008;71(5):928–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ozardili I, Guldur ME, Ciftci H, et al. Correlation between lymphangiogenesis and clinicopathological parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Singapore Med J. 2012;53(5):332–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vaidya VS, Waikar SS, Ferguson MA, et al. Urinary biomarkers for sensitive and specific detection of acute kidney injury in humans. Clinical and translational science. 2008;1(3):200–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
NIHMS1525860-supplement-1.docx (12.9KB, docx)
2
NIHMS1525860-supplement-2.tif (759KB, tif)
3
NIHMS1525860-supplement-3.tif (372.5KB, tif)
4
NIHMS1525860-supplement-4.docx (13.1KB, docx)

RESOURCES