Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Sep 2;9:12639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49076-2

Performance of novel MgS doped cellulose nanofibres for Cd(II) removal from industrial effluent – mechanism and optimization

Nalini Sankararamakrishnan 1,, Rishabh Singh 1,2, Ila Srivastava 1
PMCID: PMC6718681  PMID: 31477772

Abstract

Green environment friendly and novel nano MgS decorated cellulose nanofibres (MgS@CNF) were prepared, characterized and evaluated towards the removal of heavy metal namely, cadmium from aqueous solutions. Cellulose nanofibres acted as a template for effective dispersion of MgS nanoparticles and also aid in the complexation of cadmium ions. In depth X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infra red spectroscopy (FTIR) studies revealed that doped MgS on mild acidification yields insitu production of H2S which effectively complexes cadmium ion to form cadmium sulfide. The reaction followed pseudo first order kinetics with regression coefficient in the order of 0.98. A very high Langmuir adsorption capacity in the order of 333.33 mg/g was obtained for MgS@CNF. Finally, MgS@CNF was applied towards the removal of cadmium from organic and TDS rich tannery waste water. MgS@CNF was effective in bringing down the concentration from ppm to ppb levels.

Subject terms: Environmental chemistry, Environmental sciences, Pollution remediation

Introduction

Heavy metal pollution by industrial wastewater is one of the indispensable environmental challenges worldwide. Among various heavy metals, non-biodegradability and bioaccumulation makes Cadmium (Cd) as one of the most toxic heavy metals1. Cadmium primarily finds use in plastics and steel production and it has been listed as Group-B1 and category-I carcinogen by the US EPA and International Agency for Research on Cancer respectively2. Mainly Cd accumulates in bones, pancreas, livers and kidneys, and, which causes various ailments like nephritis, neuralgia, hypertension, secretion disorder and anemia3. Various methods have been reported for removal including chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, adsorption, and ion-exchange4. Among these methods, removal of heavy metal contamination by adsorption process is considered as economic, reliable, and effective method5,6. Various adsorbents like activated carbon7, zeolites8, nanozerovalent iron9,10, carbon nano tubes11,12, graphene13, functionalized chitosan14,15, low cost agricultural wastes16,17 have been found useful for its removal. It is to be noted among these, adsorbents modified with sulfur containing ligands exhibited excellent adsorption capacity owing to soft-soft interaction effective complexation of Cd and sulphur ligands15,18,19. Further it was also observed that nanocomposites with increased surface area provided efficient metal ion binding20,21. Thus in this work green biodegradable cellulose nanofibers were extracted from low cost agricultural waste sugarcane bagasse and nano MgS were effectively doped on this nanofiber and evaluated for its capacity towards cadmium. This is the first time we have reported a novel MgS doped bio-nanocomposite. Cellulose nanofiber provides a template for effective dispersion of MgS and also helps in preventing the agglomeration of the nano MgS. Characterization with various analytical techniques, optimization, mechanism of interaction and its application towards cadmium removal from tannery waste water are detailed in the following sections.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of MgS@CNF and mechanism of interaction

The scanning electroscopy images of MgS@CNF and Cd loaded MgS@CNF are shown in Fig. 1a,b respectively. It is evident MgS is uniformly loaded on nanofibers and adsorption of Cd on the surface of the fibers is also clear. Further EDX spectra revealed the presence of Mg, S and Cd on Cd loaded MgS@CNF (Fig. 1c). The FTIR spectra MgS@CNF are shown in Fig. 2a. Broad band around 3700 cm−1 in both MgS@CNF and Cd- MgS@CNF could be attributed to –OH stretching vibrations of hydrogen bonded cellulose moeity whereas the sharp peak around 3427 cm−1 is due to the free –OH stretching vibrations. The stretching bands of O-CH3 are observed at 2930 cm−1 which arises from the trace lignin of cellulose fibres22,23. The S-O group gave rise symmetric and asymmetric vibrations at 1109 and 1023 cm−1 respectively24. Very sharp and strong bands are observed in both the spectra at 1642 cm−1 which could be attributed to non dissociated water molecules25. In MgS@CNF anchoring of sulfur molecules on cellulose nanofibers is proved by the presence of vibrations at 435 cm−1 and 590 cm−1 which is due to presence of polysulfide and disulfide respectively24. After Cd(II) adsorption, appearance of Cd-S stretching vibrations were observed at 664 and 720 cm−126 confirming the formation of CdS on the surface of MgS@CNF. The XRD pattern of MgS@CNF and Cd(II) loaded MgS@CNF were recorded and the diffraction pattern is shown in Fig. 2b. Sharp peaks were absent in MgS@CNF due to the amorphous nature of MgS. However, cadmium loaded MgS@CNF exhibited peaks indexed to Cd(OH)2 with strong (101), (200) and (321) reflections (JCPDS card No. 31-0118) and hexagonal CdS with strong reflections of miller indices (100), (110), (103) and (112) which are consistent with the literature values(JCPDS card No. 41-1049).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) SEM image of CNF (b). SEM image of Cd(II) loaded MgS@CNF inset TEM image of MgS (c). SAED pattern of MgS@CNF (d). EDAX plot of Cd-MgS@CNF.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) FTIR spectra of MgS@CNF and Cd-MgS@CNF (b). XRD spectra of MgS@CNF and Cd-MgS@CNF.

XPS survey spectra of cadmium loaded MgS@CNF exhibited peaks corresponding to sulfur, Mg and Cd indicating effective loading of magnesium and complexing of cadmium with sulfur ions (Fig. S1, Supporting Information). Furthermore the deconvoluted core level XPS spectra of S 2p before and after loading with Cd are shown in Fig. 3a,b respectively. As expected, before Cd loading all the sulfur ions were either as monosulfides27 or polysulfides28 corresponding to binding energies 161.01 and 167.31 eV respectively. However after Cadmium loading the binding energies of S2p3/2 are shifted to lower binding energy values. The peak at binding energy value 160.68 ev correspond to CdS29 and the strong peak at 166.0 ev corresponds to polysulfides of Cd/Mg ions. Figure (3c) depicts Cd-3d spectra, and the details are given in Table 1. It is evident that peaks were observed at 405.6 eV and 412.3 eV corresponding to 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 respectively. The binding energies obtained were consistent with that of CdS30,31 and in addition to these peaks, additional peaks of at 405.5 eV for 3d5/2 and 411.8 eV for 3d3/2 were obtained. These peak positions corresponds to cadmium hydroxide32,33. Thus from the afore mentioned discussions, following mechanism is postulated

2MgS+4H2O+2H+2Mg(OH)2+2H2S 1
2MgS2+4H2O+4H+2Mg(OH)2+4H2S 2
Cd(II)+H2SCdS 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3

XPS molecular level spectra of S 2p in MgS@CNF (a). before and (b). after Cd(II) loading (c). Molecular level spectra of Cd 3d in Cd-MgS@CNF.

Table 1.

Molecular level XPS analysis of MgS@CNF before and after Cd(II) loading.

Before/After Cd(II) Loading Element B.E. (eV) Fraction (%) Species Reference
Before Sp3/2

161.10

167.31

70.3

29.7

S2−

Polysulfides of Mg

27, 28
After Sp3/2

160.68

166.00

53.5

46.5

CdS

Polysulfides of Mg/Cd

29, 28
After Cd d5/2

412.3

411.6

19.8

18.3

CdS

Cd(OH)2

3033
Cd d1/2

405.6

404.8

31.9

30.0

CdS

Cd(OH)2

3033

Apart from CdS, it is evident from XPS study that hydroxide salts of Cadmium are also observed which could be attributed to the interaction between the hydroxide groups of cellulose moiety with Cd(II) ions. Further, it is worth mentioning that EDX studies around 2.1 weight % of Sulfur is present on the adsorbent. Since we use low amount of adsorbent, the amount of hydrogen sulfide gas released is sufficient enough to remove the pollutant and will not pose a secondary pollution.

Effect of Initial pH on adsorption of Cd by MgS@CNF

Initial solution pH plays a significant role in the adsorption of Cd by MgS@CNF and CNF. There are two processes involved in the adsorption of Cd by MgS@CNF. Initially, MgS/MgS2 undergoes acid hydrolysis to yield insitu H2S gas as depicted in equation 1 and 2. Later, produced H2S gas reacts with Cd(II) ions to form CdS as shown in equation 3. Thus at low pH though formation of H2S is favorable it is ineffective in complexing with Cd ions. At very high pH values though formation of CdS is favorable, however, formation of H2S is insignificant. Hence between pH 5.5 to 6.0 both the processes namely evolution of H2S and formation of CdS is favorable.

Thus from the Fig. 4a it is evident that adsorption is negligible at pH values less than 3 and then slowly it increases with increase in pH. Cadmium removal increased from 77.5% to 94.5% with increase of pH from 5 to 5.5 and remained constant till pH 6 and further increase in pH to 8 resulted in decreased adsorption of around 40%. In the case of CNF, it is evident that adsorption of Cd increases with pH and reaches a maximum of 10.72% at pH 7.5 and subsequent increase in pH resulted in decreased adsorption of Cd ions by CNF. This could be attributed to the complexing of OH ions of cellulose and cadmium ions to form cadmium hydroxide. At higher pH values, cadmium exists as Cd(OH)2 and precipitation occurs and free Cd ions are unavailable for complexation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of Initial pH on Cd(II) Adsorption by (a). MgS@CNF (b). CNF (c). Kinetics of Cd(II) Adsorption on CNF and MgS@CNF (d). Pseudo First order kinetics plot and (e). Web-morris plot of CNF and MgS@CNF and cadmium systems.

Reaction kinetics of Cd with CNF and MgS@CNF

The reaction kinetics Cd removal by CNF and MgS@CNF indicated a rapid binding of Cd ions by the nanocomposite during the initial minutes followed by a gradual increase until a steady state of equilibrium was reached. Steady state was achieved after 1 h and 16 h of equilibration for CNF and MgS@CNF respectively (Fig. 4b). In the case of MgS@CNF slow release of H2S took place and hence it took longer time to achieve equilibrium compared of plain CNF. Similar to this study longer equilibration times have been reported on the removal of Cd by chitin34, xanthated chitosan35. Obtained data was modeled by pseudo first order equation given below:

log(qeqt)=log(qe)k12.303T 4

where qe and qt are the amount of Cd ions adsorbed by MgS@CNF in mg/g at given time “T” and equilibrium respectively and k1 is the pseudo first order constant in h−1. Various constants obtained are detailed in Table 2 and the plot is depicted in Fig. 4c. Adsorption of pollutants onto onto solid surface is also governed by intraparticle diffusion. Thus intraparticle diffusion rates of Cd ions onto CNF and MgS@CNF could be modeled using Weber and Morris model given by equation (5)

qt=Kintt 5

where “qt” is the amount of Cd adsorbed by CNF/MgS@CNF at a given time “t” and “Kint” is the intraparticle diffusion constant. Both CNF and MgS@CNF plots of qt Vs T yielded straight line with a high correlation coefficient and intercept Fig. (4d). Thus it could be concluded that the intraparticle diffusion of Cd ions onto CNF/MgS@CNF is not the sole rate determining step governing sorption.

Table 2.

Kinetic and isotherm parameters on adsorption of Cadmium by CNF and Mgs@CNF.

Adsorbent (pH) Isotherm Constants Kinetics Constants
Langmuir Freundlich Pseudo First Order Web Morris
Q(max) (mg/g) b R2 1/n Kf R2 kL (h−1) qe (mg/g) R2 kint (g/mg/h0.5) R2
CNF (7.5) 7.81 ± 0.56 0.2415 0.99 3.559 2.576 0.911 0.0322 1.51 0.97 0.970 0.98
MgS@CNF (5.5) 333.33 ± 2.02 0.1071 0.99 1.280 29.785 0.989 0.0875 17.02 0.98 3.801 0.99

Adsorption isotherms of Cd with CNF and MgS@CNF systems

Cadmium adsorption equilibrium isotherms for CNF and MgS@CNF are shown in Fig. 5a. Obtained adsorption data using CNF and MgS@CNF were modeled using widely used Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Unlike Freundlich model, Langmuir model is based on the assumption of monolayer and the both the models are represented by equations 6 and 7 respectively.

logqe=1nlogce+logkf 6
1qe=1ceqmaxb+1qmax 7

where qe and ce are the amount of cadmium adsorbed (mg/g) and concentration of cadmium at equilibrium (mg/l) respectively. “Kf” and “n” are freundlich adsorption and affinity constants. “qmax” and “b” are Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacity (mg/g) and equilibrium constant (ml/mg) respectively. Langmuir and Freundlich plots are presented in Fig. 5b,c respectively and obtained adsorption constants are listed in Table 2. A comparison on the adsorption capacities of various sorbents recently reported in literature is listed in Table S1 of supporting information. Adsorbents anchored with sulfur containing groups are given for comparison purposes. It is evident from the data thatadsorption capacity of the MgS@CNF towards Cd(II) is higher than the ones reported in the literature. This could be attributed to the insitu generation of hydrogen sulfide gas which effectively complexes with Cd(II).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Equilibrium Adsorption isotherm (a) CNF (b). MgS@CNF, (c). Langmuir Plot and (d). Freundlich Plots of CNF and MgS@CNF and cadmium systems.

Thermodynamic studies

Thermodynamic parameters including change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG°), enthalpy (ΔH°) and entropy (ΔS°)were calculated by conducting the adsorption experiments of MgS@CNF and Cd(II) systems at three different temperatures namely 25, 35 and 45 °C. From adsorption data, thermodynamic parameters were determined. Initially, Kc, the equilibrium constant for MgS@CNF and Cd(II) was determined using equation (8)

KC=CACe 8

where, CA(g/L) is the concentration of Cd(II) in the aqueous phase and Ce is the equilibrium concentration of Cd(II) (g/l). Then, equation (9) was used calculate Gibbs free energy change change.

ΔG=RTlnKc 9

where R is the gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin. Further, Van’t Hoff equation (10) was used to calculate entropy (ΔS) and enthalpy change (ΔH) was determined:

logKc=ΔS2.303ΔH2.303RT 10

A linear plot was constructed between ln Kc vs. 1/T of Cd(II) and MgS@CNF, and ΔS° and ΔH° were determined from the intercept and slope, respectively. The results obtained are presented in Table S2 of the supporting information. The spontaneity and feasibility of the adsorption process between MgS@CNF and Cd(II) ions is indicated by negative free energy values, while the positive ΔH° values indicate the endothermic nature of the sorption process. Entropy (ΔS°) of adsorption yielded positive values which could be attributed to Cd(II) ion dehydration during surface sorption onto MgS@CNF.

Application to real industrial effluent

Industrial effluent from local tanneries was collected and the characteristics of the same are listed in Table S2 of the supporting information. Tannery effluents were treated with 0.1 g of MgS@CNF after 10 times dilution and adjusting the pH 5.5. The solutions were equilibrated for 16 h and the concentration of cadmium and other heavy metal ions were determined by ICPMS. It is evident from the data (Table 3) that MgS@CNF is effective in removing the cadmium concentration from ppm to ppb levels. Apart from cadmium, it is also evident that it is efficient in bringing down the concentration other metal ions including Cr, Pb, As, Zn and COD as well. Insitu generation of H2S during adsorption promotes the precipitation of other soft metals like Zn, Pb, As and Zn onto the surface of the adsorbent and thus we observe the reduction in concentration of these metal ions. Tannery effluent comprises both Cr(VI) and Cr(III) species. During adsorption, Cr(VI) could be reduced to Cr(III) by the sulfide ions. Reduced Cr(III) and Cr(III) already present in tannery effluent could be immobilized as hydroxides/sulfides onto the adsorbent surface. Because of this redox reaction a decreased value of chemical oxygen demand is observed after adsorption. Hence the prepared adsorbent could be applicable to treat other wastewaters as well.

Table 3.

Application of MgS@CNF to Industrial effluent.

Effluent Before Adsorption (mg/l) After Adsorption (mg/l)
Cd Total Cr Pb Zn As COD Cd Total Cr Pb Zn As COD
1 1.758 110.71 0.0015 0.0595 0.001 6857 0.003 12.521 0.0005 0.001 0.0005 3200
2 2.516 121.91 0.0022 0.0785 0.002 6857 0.019 16.524 0.0007 0.002 0.0003 3550
3 5.948 157.59 0.0031 0.0975 0.0014 20571 0.105 20.520 0.0006 0.003 0.0002 7360

Materials and Methods

Materials required

Various chemicals including, sodium/Potassium hydroxide (NaOH/KOH), bleach (NaOCl), nitric acid (HNO3), Sodium Sulfide (Na2S), Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), Cadmium nitrate (Cd(NO3)2 .4H2O) and other reagents used were of AR grade. All the reagents and standards were prepared with Milli-Q water with a resistivity > 18.2 MΩ cm.

Preparation of MgS@CNF

Agrowaste namely dried and powdered sugarcane bagasse was used to prepare cellulose nanofibers by the procedure reported elsewhere23. Briefly soxhlet extraction was initially performed on raw sugarcane bagasse for 6 h using organic mixture consisting of toluene and ethanol to remove the organic contaminants. Further, degradation of lignin was carried out using combination of bleach and acetic acid. Washing the product with distilled water and further treatment with KOH resulted in the removal of hemicelluloses moiety. This was followed by acid wash to remove residual alkali and air dried to obtain cellulose nanofibers (CNF).

Initially 2 g CNF was placed in a two neck Erlenmeyer flask with 200 mL of Milli Q water. This was followed by addition of 40 ml 0.2 M MgSO4.7H2O and the resultant mixture was stirred for 15 min. Further, around 20 ml of 0.4 M Na2S was added gradually using a syringe. The whole setup was kept in nitrogen atmosphere to avoid air oxidation. Continuous stirring for 30 min. ensured successful completion of the reaction and obtained product was washed and further heated for 200 °C in inert (N2) atmosphere for 2 h to obtain MgS@CNF. Obtained MgS@CNF was stored in dessicator until further use.

Characterization of MgS@CNF

FEI Quanta 200 microscope was used for Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) and Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images and after gold coating. Fourier Transform Infra-red (FTIR) spectra of Virgin and cadmium loaded MgS@CNF was obtained using Tensor 27 (Bruker, Germany). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic measurements (XPS) were recorded with PHI 5000 Versa ProbII, FEI Inc. using a monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). Deconvoluted spectra of Cd and Sulfur were produced using XPS PEAK 4.1 software with a Gaussian–Lorentzian sum function.

Equilibrium adsorption experiments with CNF and MgS@CNF

Equilibrium adsorption experiments with both CNF and MgS@CNF in batch reactors. Equilibrations with both nanomaterials were performed for 16 h, maintaining the temperature at 25 °C in shaking incubator set to an rpm of 110. Filtration of samples were carried out after equilibration and analyzed for Cd(II) after suitable dilutions using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICPMS). The experimental conditions performed were: dose of adsorbent: 0.5 g/l, pH: 5.5 for MgS@CNF and pH: 7.5 for CNF, equilibration time: 16 h, initial concentration of Cd(II): 10 mg/l, total aqueous volume: 20 ml. Equilibrium isotherm experiments were performed by varying initial Cd(II) concentrations (10 to 200 mg/l) for MgS@CNF and 10 to 100 mg/l for CNF. The amount of Cd(II) adsorbed by CNF and MgS@CNF were obtained from eqn (11):

qe=(CiCe)XVW 11

where qe is the quantity of Cd(II) adsorbed by both the prepared adsorbents (mg/1), Ci and Ce are the initial and equilibrium Cd(II) concentration (mg/1), W is the mass of the sorbent used (g) V is final aqueous volume. For kinetic studies, determination of Cd(II) uptake was carried at defined time intervals.

Conclusions

In the present study MgS doped cellulose nanofibres were prepared characterized and applied towards the removal of Cadmium from industrial wastewater. Cellulose nanofibers acted as a template for the effective dispersion of MgS. MgS acted as source of sulfide ions for complexing cadmium. The Langmuir monolayer adsorption capacity towards Cd(II) for MgS@CNF (333.3 mg/g) was found to be higher than virgin CNF (7.81 mg/g). Effective anchoring of MgS was evident from XPS and XRD studies. Detailed spectroscopic investigations revealed the formation of CdS which accounts for the very high adsorption capacity. Furthermore, the ability of MgS@CNF to remove Cd ions from industrial waste water is demonstrated. Finally, it could be postulated that similar to Cd, prepared adsorbent can find application in the removal of other heavy metal ions like Cr(VI), Hg(II), Pb(II), Cu(II) as well.

Supplementary information

41598_2019_49076_MOESM1_ESM.docx (72.4KB, docx)

Performance of novel MgS doped cellulose nanofibres for Cd(II) removal from industrial effluent – mechanism and optimization

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India (ref No. SR/WOS-A/CS-10/2016) for the research funding. The fellowship for NS by DST is gratefully acknowledged. Advanced centre for material sciences, Advanced Imaging Centre and Thematic Unit of Excellence on Soft Nanofabrication, at IIT Kanpur are acknowledged for various characterization studies.

Author Contributions

N.S. and R.S. designed and conceived the experiment. R.S. and I.S. carried out the experiment. N.S. wrote the manuscript. All the authors took part in the discussion throughout the study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-49076-2.

References

  • 1.Kumar R, Chawla J, Kaur I. Removal of cadmium ion from wastewater by carbon-based nanosorbents: a review. Journal of Water and Health. 2015;13(1):18–33. doi: 10.2166/wh.2014.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Purkayastha D, Mishra U, Biswas S. A comprehensive review on Cd(II) removal from aqueous solution. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2014;2:105–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang K, Tao X, Xu J, Yin N. Novel chitosan-MOF composite adsorbent for the removal of heavy metal ions. Chemistry letters. 2016;45:1365–1368. doi: 10.1246/cl.160718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dhanarani S, Viswanathan E, Piruthiviraj P, Arivalagan P, Kaliannan T. Comparative study on the biosorption of aluminum by free and immobilized cells of Bacillus safensis KTSMBNL 26 isolated from explosive contaminated soil. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2016;000:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sud D, Mahajan G, Kaur MP. Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions-A review. Bioresource technology. 2008;99(14):6017–6027. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lo SF, Wang SY, Tsai MJ, Lin LD. Adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of heavy metal ions by Moso and Ma bamboo activated carbons. Chemical Engineering Research & Design. 2012;90(9):1397–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.11.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eeshwarasinghe D, Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S. Simultaneous removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals from water using granular activated carbon. Chemosphere. 2019;223:616–627. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ugrina M, Medvidovic NV, Trgo M, Nuic I. Optimization of removal efficiency and minimum contact time for cadmium and zinc removal onto iron-modified zeolite in a two-stage batch sorption reactor. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly. 2018;31(4):425–435. doi: 10.15255/CABEQ.2017.1119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Soto Hidalgo KT, et al. Photoelectrochemical Solar Cells Prepared From NanoscaleZerovalent Iron Used for Aqueous Cd2+ Removal. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering. 2016;4:738–745. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guo X, et al. Simple combination of oxidants with zero-alent-iron (ZVI) achieved very rapid and highly efficient removal of heavy metals from water. Water Research. 2016;88:671–680. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sankararamakrishnan N, Jaiswal M, Verma N. Composite nanofloral clusters of carbon nanotubes and activated alumina: An efficient sorbent for heavy metal removal. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2014;235:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oyetade OA, Nyamori VO, Jonnalagadda SB, Martincigh BS. Removal of Cd 2+ and Hg 2+ from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto nitrogen-functionalized carbon nanotubes. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2018;108:253–267. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2018.21955. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mudila H, et al. An insight into Cadmium poisoning and its removal from aqueous sources by Graphene Adsorbents. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2019;29(1):1–21. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1506568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pal P, Pal A. Modifications of chitosan for cadmium removal: A short review. Journal of Polymer Materials. 2017;34(1):331–341. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chauhan D, Jaiswal M, Sankararamakrishnan N. Removal of cadmium and hexavalent chromium from electroplating waste water using thiocarbamoyl chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;88(2):670–675. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dai Y, Sun Q, Wang W, Gao F, Zhang Y. Utilizations of agricultural waste as adsorbent for the removal of contaminants. A review: Chemosphere. 2018;211:235–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pyrzynska, K. Removal of cadmium from wastewaters with low cost adsorbents. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 102795 (2019).
  • 18.Shang Z, Zhang L, Zhao X, Liu S, Li D. Removal of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) from aqueous solution by mercapto-modified coal gangue. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;231:391–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Venkateswarlu, S. & Yoon, M. Rapid removal of cadmium ions using green-synthesized Fe3 O4 nanoparticles capped with diethyl-4-(4 amino-5-mercapto-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)phenyl phosphonate. RSC Advances. 5(80), 65444–65453 (2015).
  • 20.Gong J, et al. Adsorption of heavy metal ions by hierarchically structured magnetite-carbonaceous spheres. Talanta. 2012;101:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gupta A, Vidyarthi SR, Sankararamakrishnan N. Enhanced sorption of mercury from compact fluorescent bulbs and contaminated water streams using functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2014;274:132–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nada AAMA, El-Sakhawy M, Kamel SM. Infra-red spectroscopic study of lignins. Polymer degradation and stability. 1998;60:247–251. doi: 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00072-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sankararamakrishan N, Shankwar AK, Chauhan D. Mechanistic insights on immobilization and decontamination of hexavalent chromium onto nanoMgS/FeS doped cellulose nanofibres. Chemosphere. 2019;228:390–397. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mikhlin Y, et al. Reactivity of Pyrrhotite (Fe9S10) Surfaces: Spectroscopic Studies. Physical chemistry chemical physics. 2000;2:4393–4398. doi: 10.1039/b005372o. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Babou F, Coudurier G, Vedrine JC. Acidic properties of sulfated zirconia: An infrared spectroscopic study. Journal of Catalysis. 1995;152:341–349. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1995.1088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Devi R, Purkayastha P, Kalita PK, Sharma BK. Synthesis of nanocrystallineCdS thin films in PVA matrix. Bulletin of Materials Science. 2007;30:123. doi: 10.1007/s12034-007-0022-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pratt AR, Muir IJ, Nesbitt HW. X-ray photoelectron and Auger electron studies of pyrrhotiteand mechanism of air oxidation. GeochimicaetCosmochimicaActa. 1994;8:5147–5159. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim HS, et al. Structure and compatibility of a magnesium electrolyte with a sulphur cathode.Nature. Communications. 2011;2:427. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kolhe S, Kuljarni SK, Nigavekar AS, Sharma SK. Effects of air annealing on chemically deposited CdS films examined by XPS and XRD. Solar Energy materials. 1984;10:47–54. doi: 10.1016/0165-1633(84)90007-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gaarenstroom, S. W. & Winograd, N. J. Journal of Chemical Physics 67, 3500 (1977).
  • 31.Bhide, V. G., Salkalachen, S., Rastog, A.C. C., Rao, N. R. & Hegde, M. S. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 14, 1647 (1981).
  • 32.Hammond JS, Gaarenstroom SW, Winograd N. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Studies of Cadmium- and Silver-Oxygen Surfaces. Analytical Chemistry. 1975;47:2194. doi: 10.1021/ac60363a019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wagner, C. D., Riggs, W. M., Davis, L. E., Moulder, J. F. & Muilenberg, G. E. Handbook X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Ed Perkin-Elmer, (1979).
  • 34.Benguella B, Benaissa H. Cadmium removal from aqueous solutions by chitin: Kinetic equilibrium studies. Water research. 2002;36:2463–2474. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00459-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sankararamakrishnan N, Sharma AK, Sanghi R. Novel chitosan derivative for the removal of cadmium in the presence of cyanide from electroplating wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007;148(1–2):353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41598_2019_49076_MOESM1_ESM.docx (72.4KB, docx)

Performance of novel MgS doped cellulose nanofibres for Cd(II) removal from industrial effluent – mechanism and optimization


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES