Abstract
Clinically relevant inhibitors of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), a rate-limiting enzyme in mammalian de novo pyrimidine synthesis, have strong antiviral and anticancer activity in vitro. However, they are ineffective in vivo due to efficient uridine salvage by infected or rapidly dividing cells. The pyrimidine salvage enzyme uridine-cytidine kinase 2 (UCK2), a ~29 kDa protein that forms a tetramer in its active state, is necessary for uridine salvage. Notwithstanding the pharmacological potential of this target, no medicinally tractable inhibitors of the human enzyme have been reported to date. We therefore established and miniaturized an in vitro assay for UCK2 activity and undertook a high-throughput screen against a ~ 40,000-compound library to generate drug-like leads. The structures, activities, and modes of inhibition of the most promising hits are described. Notably, our screen yielded non-competitive UCK2 inhibitors which were able to suppress nucleoside salvage in cells both in the presence and absence of DHODH inhibitors.
Keywords: de novo pyrimidine synthesis, pyrimidine salvage, uridine-cytidine kinase, uridine, high-throughput screening, pyrimidine processing inhibitors, DHODH inhibitor, GSK983
Graphical Abstract

In mammalian cells, the biosynthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides is complex, and tightly regulated by multiple mechanisms1. Briefly, pyrimidine nucleotides are synthesized by a de novo or a salvage pathway, which converge at uridine/cytidine monophosphate (UMP, CMP) (Figure 1). In the de novo biosynthesis pathway, a multifunctional enzyme, CAD, harboring carbamoyl phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase activities, converts L-glutamine, aspartate, and bicarbonate into dihydroorotate (DHO) through a series of reactions. The following enzyme, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), resides on the mitochondrial membrane and coverts DHO into orotic acid while shuttling two electrons into the electron transport chain via Coenzyme Q (CoQ). The remaining steps of de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis involve conversion of orotic acid into UMP by a bifunctional protein, uridine monophosphate synthetase (UMPS) in two steps. Alternatively, UMP can be synthesized by the salvage pathway where extracellular pyrimidines are absorbed from the bloodstream via plasma membrane transporters. In the cytosol, uridine/cytidine kinase (UCK) phosphorylates uridine and cytidine in an ATP-dependent manner. The resulting UMP and CMP from either source is further phosphorylated into UTP and CTP, respectively, through successive action of cytidine monophosphate kinase 1 (CMPK1) and nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK). The nucleotide diphosphate intermediates in these final steps are also utilized by dividing cells for deoxynucleotide biosynthesis.
Figure 1.
Biosynthesis of pyrimidines.
A number of inhibitors of the de novo pyrimidine pathway have been studied in the laboratory and clinic. For example, N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate blocks CAD2, the first enzyme of the pyrimidine synthesis pathway. Similarly, the FDA-approved drug, teriflunomide, inhibits DHODH, and is used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and arthritis3. In vitro, DHODH inhibitors have broad-range anti-viral and anti-cancer properties. However, this effect does not translate to in vivo systems, presumably because inhibition of pyrimidine biosynthesis is compensated by the salvage pathway4–5. Plasma uridine levels are tightly regulated in the low micromolar concentration range through a mechanism that is not fully understood1, but involves both adipocytes and the bile6–7.
Our genome-wide functional analysis of GSK983, a potent small-molecule antiviral agent, identified its mode of action as a DHODH inhibitor8. The same unbiased growth-based genetic screen revealed that GSK983 activity was synergistic with knock-down of pyrimidine salvage enzyme UCK2 in K562 cells9. UCK2 is differentially expressed in many cancer tissues and in cells subjected to viral infection and is the predominant UCK isozyme expressed in K562 cells10–12. Together, these facts led us to prioritize UCK2 over UCK1 for this study. Although broad-range nucleoside transport inhibitors, such as the FDA-approved drug diypyridamole (DP), are sometimes used to block nucleoside salvage13, the few published UCK2 inhibitors have not been sufficiently characterized for drug development14–15. We therefore sought to discover lead UCK2 inhibitors by high-throughput screening of a publicly available (PubChem) small molecule library.
As a first step, we confirmed the biological significance of UCK2. To do so, uridine salvage was measured by incorporating exogenous 5-ethynyl-uridine (5-EU) specifically into cellular RNA. A fluorescent probe was used to quantify 5-EU in RNA via click chemistry16 (Figure 2A). To validate UCK2 as a target for uridine salvage, gene expression was down-regulated using two different shRNA constructs in K562 cells. The resulting cell lines showed a decrease in uridine incorporation into cellular RNA (Figure 2B). The same assay also validated dipyridamole as a control uridine salvage inhibitor (Figure 2C).
Figure 2.
[A] Assay for quantifying uridine salvage into cellular RNA using 5-ethynyl-uridine (5-EU) and a fluorescent probe. [B] Uridine salvage when UCK2 expression was down-regulated using two different shRNA constructs in K562 cells. [C] Dipyridamole inhibits 5-EU uptake in a dose-dependent manner in A549 cells.
We also investigated the effect of DHODH inhibition on the uridine salvage pathway using 5-EU. After K562 cells were treated with GSK983, the 5-EU assay was performed in comparison with untreated K562 cells. Interestingly, GSK983 treatment significantly increased uridine salvage (Figure S1). Thus, when cells were unable to convert L-glutamine into pyrimidines, the salvage pathway was able to compensate for the loss. This finding is consistent with the findings from animal experiments, where DHODH inhibitors were ineffective due to uridine salvage4–5.
We next conducted enzymatic high-throughput screening (HTS) to enable the discovery of small molecule modulators of UCK2. UCK2 was expressed as a C-terminally His6-tagged protein. The protein was purified using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography followed by ion-exchange chromatography. Based on the ability of this enzyme to catalyze phosphoryl transfer from ATP to uridine or cytidine, the luciferase-based ADP-Glo™ kinase assay was adopted for HTS. The ADP-Glo™ kinase assay measures ADP formed in the enzymatic reaction by first eliminating all of the unused ATP in the solution. The ADP is then converted into ATP, which is used to generate light in a luciferase reaction. Under conditions where the luminescence generated is proportional to the kinase activity (Figure S2), the assay is well suited for measuring compound activity with reasonable Z`-factors with linear response over 30 min (Figure S3A).
We first optimized the ADP-Glo™ kinase assay for a 1536-well plate format by adjusting the conditions of the ATP removal step (see Experimental Procedures for details). Under these conditions, UCK2 was stable up to 6 h on ice in the presence of 0.5 mg/mL BSA (Figure S3B); activity decreased over 9 h, but a linear dose-response was preserved (Figure S3C). The enzyme was unaffected by DMSO up to 3% (Figure S3D). Under steady state conditions, the following kinetic parameters were measured by varying uridine: KM = 62 ± 5 µM and kcat / KM = 2.0 × 105 s−1·M−1. When ATP was varied, the analogous kinetic parameters were KM = 61 ± 1 µM and kcat/KM = 2.5 × 105 s−1·M−1, consistent with values reported previously17 (Figure S4).
Using the above 1536-well assay format, a library of 40,000 small molecules (the “PubChem set”) was screened at 33 μM and showed acceptable performance (average Z´ = 0.6). Using 3 standard deviations of the negative control as a cut-off for hit selection, 128 inhibitory hits were identified in the primary screen and 21 compounds showed apparent activation with up to 10-fold higher signal than DMSO controls. These compounds were retested at 8 different concentrations with half-log dilutions ranging from 0.05–167 µM, which validated 59 inhibitors and 6 activators of UCK2. All activators had AC50 values higher than 166 µM and were therefore not followed up in this study (data not shown).
A continuous UCK2 enzyme assay was developed for detailed analysis of some promising inhibitors and their analogs identified via HTS. In this assay, UCK2 activity was coupled to the pyruvate kinase (PK) reaction, which in turn was coupled to lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Overall reaction progress could be followed in a continuous assay mode by monitoring the consumption of NADH via UV spectroscopy at 340 nm.
The inhibitors were grouped into three sets based on structural similarity (Figure 3). The first set (represented by compounds 135546734 and 135416439) contained a pyrazolo[3,4-d]- or triazolo[4,5-d]-pyrimidine core (Figure 3A). Compound 135416439, which had an IC50 of 16.4 µM upon retesting in the ADP-Glo assay, was non-competitive with uridine (Ki = 13 ±3 µM) and ATP (Ki = 12 ±2 µM) (Figure S5, Table 1). The structurally-related compound 135546734 had an IC50 of 48.0 µM in the ADP-Glo assay when retested (Figure S5). Compound 135546734 showed no inhibition in an analogous ADP-Glo screen for CMPK1.
Figure 3.
Selected UCK2 inhibitors from high-throughput validation screen, grouped according to structures.
Table 1.
Activities of compounds identified from the HTS screen and structurally-related analogs
| PubChem ID (for primary hits) | Qualified IC50 obtained from the HTS (µM) | IC50 obtained from validation experiments | Ki (Uridine) (µM) | Ki (ATP) (µM) | %Inhibition at highest tested concentration (EU assay) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135416439 | 9.2 | 16.6 | 13 ±3 | 12 ± 2 | 31.3%, 50 µM |
| 135546734 | 18.9 | 48.0 | 50 ± 7 | 31 ± 10 | 41.5%, 50 µM |
| 135546734–1 | -- | 137.2 | -- | -- | 26.3%, 50 µM |
| 135546734–2 | -- | inactive | -- | -- | 19.3%, 50 µM |
| 135546734–3 | inactive | -- | -- | No inhibition | |
| 20874830 | 52 | 3.8 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 51.7%, 50 µM |
| 20874830–1 | -- | 26.8 | -- | -- | No inhibition |
| 20874830–2 | -- | 4.7 | -- | -- | 49.6%, 50 µM |
| 20874830–3 | -- | 11.8 | -- | -- | 14.9%, 50 µM |
Kinetic analysis revealed that it was similarly non-competitive with both uridine (Ki = 50 ± 7 µM) and ATP (Ki = 31 ± 10 µM) (Table 1). To verify its ability to inhibit uridine salvage in intact cells, the 5-EU uptake assay was performed on K562 cells using 20 µM dipyridamole as a control. At 50 µM, compound 135546734 inhibited 5-EU salvage by ~40%. At a concentration of 50 µM, this compound inhibited 5-EU salvage by K562 cells by ~30% (Table 1). Encouraged by these results, we tested three commercially available analogs of 135546734, as 135416439 analogs were not commercially available (Figure S6). While methyl-shifted 135546734–1 had an IC50 value of 137.2 µM, both fluoro-135546734–2 and methoxy-135546734–3 were completely inactive highlighting the importance of the fine structural details of this class of leads to their recognition by UCK2 (Figure S6). The EU assay confirmed that these analogs were largely ineffective at inhibiting uridine salvage (Figure S6, Table 1).
The second set of inhibitors had a tricyclic chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidine core with three distinct substituents (Figure 3B). Modification of the 2-phenyl substituent by methyl, hydroxy, or fluoro groups at the para position resulted in IC50 values of 52 µM, 166 µM, and 166 µM, respectively, in the ADP-Glo assay. Upon retesting, the most active compound (20874830) had an IC50 value of 3.8 µM and was also primarily non-competitive with both ATP and uridine, with Ki values of 1.0 ± 0.1 µM and 3.5 ± 0.3 µM, respectively (Figure S7, Figure 4). This compound showed 52% inhibition of uridine salvage in K562 cells at a concentration of 50 µM (Figure S7). Four commercially available analogs of 20874830 were retested in our kinetic assay to enable higher throughput at multiple time points (Figure 4); however, none showed improved activity (Table 1). Promisingly, we observed that 20874830 successfully prevented the increase in EU uptake normally observed upon co-administration of GSK983 (Figure 4E).
Figure 4.
Kinetic and biological characterization of 20874830 and analogs. [A]Uridine titration of UCK2 activity with 20874830 at a concentration of 0 µM (blue), 0.5 µM (red), 1.5 µM (green) or 4.5 µM (purple). [B]ATP titration with 20874830 at a concentration of 0 µM (blue), 0.5 µM (red), 1.5 µM (green) or 4.5 µM (purple). [C] Compound 20874830 analogs. [D] Kinetic analysis yielded IC50 values of 3.8 µM (20874830), 26.8 µM (20874830–1), 4.7 µM (20874830–2) and 11.8 µM (20874830–3) [E] EU uptake assay conducted in K562 cells using 50 µM compound and 50 µM EU. [F] EU uptake assay conducted in K562 cells using 50 µM compound and 50 µM EU in the presence of DHODH inhibitor GSK983.
The third group of inhibitors, represented by compounds 135546812 and 135546817 had a [(5-Cyano-6-oxo-4-phenyl-1,6-dihydropyrimidin-2-yl)thio]acetamide core. Compounds 135546812 and 135546817 were both relatively weak inhibitors of UCK2, with IC50 values of 80 µM and 138 µM, respectively. Therefore, we elected to not investigate the kinetic properties of this group of compounds any further. Interestingly, this group of inhibitors has a nitrile group that may be a potential site for covalent inhibition.
In summary, a high-throughput screen against a publicly available small molecule library of ~ 40,000 small molecules was undertaken with human UCK2, an enzyme that plays a critical role in uridine salvage from the extracellular environment. Three structurally distinct sets of inhibitors were identified, and their mechanism of inhibition were analyzed. The biological activities of some of these inhibitors were also investigated using an exogenously added alkynyl-tagged uridine analog, 5-EU, in K562 cells. Notwithstanding the availability of a crystal structure of human UCK218, we were unable to reliably predict the precise binding site of either family of inhibitors. Nonetheless based on kinetic observations, the two most promising inhibitor classes were non-competitive with both substrates of this bisubstrate enzyme. Due to the large number of kinases that utilize ATP as a phosphate donor, finding selective inhibitors targeted at the active sites of individual kinases has been a major challenge. Non-competitive inhibitors bind to more structurally diverse sites on kinases, and thus have inherent value as drug leads.
The first class of inhibitors has a pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine core with fused heterocyclic ring, and can be considered as bioisosteres of purines. This class of compounds has been extensively investigated as adenosine receptor antagonists and also in anti-viral, anti-cancer, tuberculostatic, anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular assays19–22. Some of these molecules have inhibitory activity toward certain protein kinases23–25. Compound 135546734 was identified as a hit in an HTS against DNA polymerase beta, eta, and iota at IC50 values of 40, 79, and 79 µM, respectively, while compound 135416439 was active in assays of DNA polymerase eta and kappa at IC50 values of 56 µM and 16 µM, respectively (PubChem). These DNA polymerases replicate through unrepaired DNA lesions by a mechanism called translesion synthesis (TLS)26. The synthesis of pyrazolopyrimidines is well established23, 27–28. Therefore, this structure offers unexplored potential to discover more potent and selective UCK2 inhibitors. The second class of inhibitors has a chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidine core. Here too, alternative synthesis schemes are available29–33, and analogs have been studied as antibacterial and antifungal reagents31, 34–35.
Uridine plays a crucial role in RNA/DNA building, protein glycosylation, central nervous system, lipid metabolism, and glycogen synthesis36. A recent study suggested that the plasma uridine affects glucose and insulin sensitivity by controlling dietary responses and modulating leptin signaling6–7. Tools that interfere with uridine processing will help us to understand its physiological role and potentially treat metabolic diseases that arise due to adiposity, impaired glucose tolerance, and hypercholesterolemia6–7.
In preliminary experiments, we have shown that inhibition of DHODH increases uridine salvage (Figure S1). We have also demonstrated that UCK2 inhibitor 20874830 can suppress this increase (Figure 4E). Understanding the dynamic between these two pathways and how they affect uridine plasma levels could be critical for use of this strategy as therapy.
As a result of our screen we identified compounds that inhibit UCK2 in the micromolar range. Ideally, in vivo studies require inhibitory compounds that are in the nanomolar range for clear pharmacological activity with minimal toxicity. Therefore, the inhibition profile of the three classes of UCK2 inhibitors identified herein can be further improved using different chemical modifications with careful examination of drug-enzyme crystal structure. In the future, in vivo studies could be performed using clinically useful DHODH inhibitors such as teriflunomide or brequinar and the UCK2 inhibitors identified from this screen. The findings of this study will form the basis for examining the dynamics between de novo synthesis and salvage pathway for pyrimidine synthesis.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Catherine Liou and Donovan Ruiz for assistance with this work.
Funding Sources
National Institute of Health (NIH), U19 Grant, project number 1U19AI109662, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and ChEM-H Chemical Biology Interface Training Program Fellowship
Abbreviations
- UCK2
uridine-cytidine kinase 2
- DP
dipyridamole
- DHODH
dihydroorotate dehydrogenase
- CMPK1
cytidine monophosphate kinase 1
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Supporting Information
Supporting information is available and includes Experimental Procedures and SI figures (file type, PDF).
References
- 1.Okesli A; Khosla C; Bassik MC, Human pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis as a target for antiviral chemotherapy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 2017, 48, 127–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Swyryd EA; Seaver SS; Stark GR, N-(Phosphonacetyl)-l-Aspartate, a Potent Transition State Analog Inhibitor of Aspartate Transcarbamylase, Blocks Proliferation of Mammalian Cells in Culture. J. Biol. Chem 1974, 249 (21), 6945–6950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu S; Neidhardt EA; Grossman TH; Ocain T; Clardy J, Structures of human dihydroorotate dehydrogenase in complex with antiproliferative agents. Structure (London, England : 1993) 2000, 8 (1), 25–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang QY; Bushell S; Qing M; Xu HY; Bonavia A; Nunes S; Zhou J; Poh MK; Sessions P. Florez de; Niyomrattanakit P; Dong H; Hoffmaster K; Goh A; Nilar S; Schul W; Jones S; Kramer L; Compton T; Shi PY, Inhibition of dengue virus through suppression of host pyrimidine biosynthesis. J. Virol 2011, 85 (13), 6548–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bonavia A; Franti M; Keaney E. Pusateri; Kuhen K; Seepersaud M; Radetich B; Shao J; Honda A; Dewhurst J; Balabanis K; Monroe J; Wolff K; Osborne C; Lanieri L; Hoffmaster K; Amin J; Markovits J; Broome M; Skuba E; Cornella-Taracido I; Joberty G; Bouwmeester T; Hamann L; Tallarico JA; Tommasi R; Compton T; Bushell SM, Identification of broad-spectrum antiviral compounds and assessment of the druggability of their target for efficacy against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (17), 6739–6744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kizaki H; Williams JC; Morris HP; Weber G, Increased Cytidine 5′-Triphosphate Synthetase Activity in Rat and Human Tumors. Cancer Res 1980, 40 (11), 3921–3927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jastroch M; Tschöp MH, controls U. Fat Science 2017, 355 (6330), 1124–1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harvey R; Brown K; Zhang Q; Gartland M; Walton L; Talarico C; Lawrence W; Selleseth D; Coffield N; Leary J; Moniri K; Singer S; Strum J; Gudmundsson K; Biron K; Romines KR; Sethna P, GSK983: A novel compound with broad-spectrum antiviral activity. Antiviral Res 2009, 82 (1), 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Deans RM; Morgens DW; Okesli A; Pillay S; Horlbeck MA; Kampmann M; Gilbert LA; Li A; Mateo R; Smith M; Glenn JS; Carette JE; Khosla C; Bassik MC, Parallel shRNA and CRISPR-Cas9 screens enable antiviral drug target identification. Nat. Chem. Biol 2016, 12 (5), 361–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shimamoto Y; Koizumi K; Okabe H; Kazuno H; Murakami Y; Nakagawa F; Matsuda A; Sasaki T; Fukushima M, Sensitivity of human cancer cells to the new anticancer ribo-nucleoside TAS-106 is correlated with expression of uridine-cytidine kinase 2. “Jpn. J. Cancer Res 2002, 93 (7), 825–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shen G; He P; Mao Y; Li P; Luh F; Ding G; Liu X; Yen Y, Overexpression of Uridine-Cytidine Kinase 2 Correlates with Breast Cancer Progression and Poor Prognosis. J. breast cancer 2017, 20 (2), 132–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang H; Hu H; Zhang Q; Yang Y; Li Y; Hu Y; Ruan X; Yang Y; Zhang Z; Shu C; Yan J; Wakeland EK; Li Q; Hu S; Fang X, Dynamic transcriptomes of human myeloid leukemia cells. Genomics 2013, 102 (4), 250–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Köse M; Schiedel AC, Nucleoside/nucleobase transporters: drug targets of the future? Future Med. Chem 2009, 1 (2), 303–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moyer JD; Karle JM; Malinowski N; Marquez VE; Salam MA; Malspeis L; Cysyk RL, Inhibition of uridine kinase and the salvage of uridine by modified pyrimidine nucleosides. Mol. Pharmacol 1985, 28 (5), 454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Malami I; Abdul AB; Abdullah R; Kassim NKB; Rosli R; Yeap SK; Waziri P; Etti IC; Bello MB, Crude Extracts, Flavokawain B and Alpinetin Compounds from the Rhizome of Alpinia mutica Induce Cell Death via UCK2 Enzyme Inhibition and in Turn Reduce 18S rRNA Biosynthesis in HT-29 Cells. PLoS One 2017, 12 (1), e0170233–e0170233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jao CY; Salic A, Exploring RNA transcription and turnover in vivo by using click chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105 (41), 15779–15784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Van Rompay AR; Norda A; Lindén K; Johansson M; Karlsson A, Phosphorylation of Uridine and Cytidine Nucleoside Analogs by Two Human Uridine-Cytidine Kinases. Mol. Pharmacol 2001, 59 (5), 1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Suzuki NN; Koizumi K; Fukushima M; Matsuda A; Inagaki F, Structural Basis for the Specificity, Catalysis, and Regulation of Human Uridine-Cytidine Kinase. Structure (London, England : 1993) 2004, 12 (5), 751–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chauhan M; Kumar R, Medicinal attributes of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines: A review. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2013, 21 (18), 5657–5668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smee DF; McKernan PA; Nord LD; Willis RC; Petrie CR; Riley TM; Revankar GR; Robins RK; Smith RA, Novel pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine nucleoside analog with broad-spectrum antiviral activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 1987, 31 (10), 1535–1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tageldin GN; Fahmy SM; Ashour HM; Khalil MA; Nassra RA; Labouta IM, Design, synthesis and evaluation of some pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines as anti-inflammatory agents. Bioorg. Chem 2018, 78, 358–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ismail NSM; Ali EMH; Ibrahim DA; Serya RAT; Ella D. A. Abou El, Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine based scaffold derivatives targeting kinases as anticancer agents. Future J. Pharm. Sci 2016, 2 (1), 20–30. [Google Scholar]
- 23.El Sayed MT; Hussein HAR; Elebiary NM; Hassan GS; Elmessery SM; Elsheakh AR; Nayel M; Abdel-Aziz HA, Tyrosine kinase inhibition effects of novel Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines and Pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidines ligand: Synthesis, biological screening and molecular modeling studies. Bioorg. Chem 2018, 78, 312–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zheng N; Hao Q; Lin K; Pan J; Li Y; Zhou W, Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1-substituted 3-(3-phenoxyprop-1-yn-1-yl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amines as potent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2019, 29 (2), 225–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang C; Liu H; Song Z; Ji Y; Xing L; Peng X; Wang X; Ai J; Geng M; Zhang A, Synthesis and structure–activity relationship study of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines as tyrosine kinase RET inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2017, 27 (11), 2544–2548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bétous R; Rey L; Wang G; Pillaire M-J; Puget N; Selves J; Biard DSF; Shin-ya K; Vasquez KM; Cazaux C; Hoffmann J-S, Role of TLS DNA polymerases eta and kappa in processing naturally occurring structured DNA in human cells. Mol. Carcinog 2009, 48 (4), 369–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cherukupalli S; Hampannavar GA; Chinnam S; Chandrasekaran B; Sayyad N; Kayamba F; Aleti R. Reddy; Karpoormath R, An appraisal on synthetic and pharmaceutical perspectives of pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidine scaffold. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2018, 26 (2), 309–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dai L; Mao K; Pan Z; Rong L, Green metal-free synthesis of spiro-fused 3,4′-pyrazolo[4′,3′:5,6]pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives via deamination cyclization reactions in aqueous medium. Res. Chem. Intermed 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rai P; Sagir H; Kumar A; Yadav B, V.; Siddiqui R, I., Organocatalyzed Synthesis of Medicinally Important Chromeno[2, 3-d]pyrimidine-triones in Biodegradable Reaction Medium. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3 (9), 2565–2570. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Soleimani E; Ghanbarian M; Saei P; Taran M, Synthesis of new derivatives of pyrazol-chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-ones by a one-pot three-component reaction. J. Iran. Chem. Soc 2015, 12 (12), 2227–2232. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aly HM; Kamal MM, Efficient one-pot preparation of novel fused chromeno[2,3-d]pyrimidine and pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2012, 47, 18–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cao D; Leffert JJ; McCabe J; Kim B; Pizzorno G, Abnormalities in uridine homeostatic regulation and pyrimidine nucleotide metabolism as a consequence of the deletion of the uridine phosphorylase gene. J. Biol. Chem 2005, 280 (22), 21169–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ziarani G. Mohammadi; Nasab N. Hosseini; Rahimifard M; Soorki A. Abolhasani, One-pot synthesis of pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives using sulfonic acid functionalized SBA-15 and the study on their antimicrobial activities. J. Saudi Chem. Soc 2015, 19 (6), 676–681. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rai U. Sankappa; Isloor AM; shetty P; Vijesh AM; Prabhu N; Isloor S; Thiageeswaran M; Fun H-K, Novel chromeno [2,3-b]-pyrimidine derivatives as potential anti-microbial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2010, 45 (6), 2695–2699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ramiz MMM; Hafiz ISA; Reheim MAMA; Gaber HM, Pyrazolones as Building Blocks in Heterocyclic Synthesis: Synthesis of New Pyrazolopyran, Pyrazolopyridazine and Pyrazole Derivatives of Expected Antifungicidal Activity. J. Chin. Chem. Soc 2012, 59 (1), 72–80. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Connolly GP; Duley JA, Uridine and its nucleotides: biological actions, therapeutic potentials. Trends Pharmacol. Sci 1999, 20 (5), 218–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




