Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 11;11(8):1869. doi: 10.3390/nu11081869

Table 6.

Differences in Food Consumption and Waste between Intervention and Control Groups at Pre-Intervention, Post-Intervention, and Five Month Follow-Up.

Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention Five Month Follow-Up
Intervention Mean Control Mean p Intervention Mean Control Mean p Intervention Mean Control Mean p
Food Consumption (% consumed)
 Vegetables 47.1% 71.8% 0.006 69.4% 68.1% 0.848 63.8% 64.8% 0.905
 Fruit 44.0% 57.9% 0.009 51.1% 56.3% 0.365 52.5% 56.4% 0.454
 Entrée * 79.1% 83.5% 0.207 87.7% 86.8% 0.821 83.1% 88.1% 0.143
 Milk 64.9% 71.0% 0.265 61.0% 62.4% 0.815 61.0% 60.3% 0.891
Food Waste (grams wasted)
 Hot Vegetable 26.4 6.1 0.015 15.4 19.2 0.384 9.5 9.8 0.965
 Salad Bar Vegetable 26.6 19.0 0.466 15.1 18.5 0.756 24.2 50.1 0.029
 Whole Fruit 79.9 68.9 0.241 61.2 52.4 0.384 62.0 67.1 0.577
 Salad Bar Fruit 51.6 55.7 0.737 49.1 69.9 0.110 46.1 70.8 0.036
 Entrée * 38.8 28.4 0.088 19.6 20.6 0.876 33.8 25.0 0.142
 A La Carte 0.8 0.2 0.648 2.2 0.2 0.091 0.0 0.1 0.918
 Milk † 2.9 2.3 0.219 3.3 3.1 0.782 3.2 3.2 0.940

Note. Estimated marginal means (controlling for gender, school, and entrée consumption) are displayed. The p-values presented are for differences between conditions (intervention vs. control) on food consumption and waste outcomes at each time point. The mean difference is significant at α = 0.05 for H0: The population mean difference is zero. Consumption means for vegetables and fruit include vegetables and fruit from the salad bar. Hot vegetable, salad bar vegetable, whole fruit, and salad bar fruit food waste outcomes are mutually exclusive. Consumption (n = 76–250) and waste (n = 52–245) depending upon time point and reimbursable meal component. * Entrée analyses did not control for entrée consumption. Entrées include combined protein and grain meal components. † Milk waste is displayed in fluid ounces.