Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Sep 4;9:12727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49138-5

Heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods arrays on Ni foam with high utilization rate and excellent structure stability for high-performance supercapacitor

Shaojie Zhou 1, Wutao Wei 1, Yingying Zhang 1, Shizhong Cui 1, Weihua Chen 2,, Liwei Mi 1,
PMCID: PMC6726609  PMID: 31484933

Abstract

The practical implementation of supercapacitors is hindered by low utilization and poor structural stability of electrode materials. Herein, to surmount these critical challenges, a three-dimensional hierarchical α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods are built in situ on Ni foam through a mild two-step growth reaction. The unique lamellar crystal structure and abundant intercalated anions of α-M(OH)2 (M = Co or Ni) and the ideal electronic conductivity of α-Co(OH)2 construct numerous cross-linked ion and electron transport paths in heterojunction nanorods. The deformation stresses exerted by α-Co(OH)2 and α-Ni(OH)2 on each other guarantee the excellent structural stability of this heterojunction nanorods. Using nickel foam with a three-dimensional network conductive framework as the template ensures the rapidly transfer of electrons between this heterojunction nanorods and current collector. Three-dimensional hierarchical structure of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods provides a large liquid interface area. These result together in the high utilization rate and excellent structure stability of the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods. And the capacitance retention rate is up to 93.4% at 1 A g−1 from three-electrode system to two-electrode system. The α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC device also present a long cycle life (the capacitance retention rate is 123.6% at 5 A g−1 for 10000 cycles), a high specific capacitance (207.2 F g−1 at 1 A g−1), and high energy density and power density (72.6 Wh kg−1 at 196.4 W kg−1 and 40.9 Wh kg−1 at 3491.8 W kg−1), exhibiting a fascinating potential for supercapacitor in large-scale applications.

Subject terms: Two-dimensional materials, Nanowires

Introduction

The rapid consumption of non-renewable energy resources and the booming development of mobile electronics and hybrid electric vehicle have aroused intensive attention on green and safe energy storage devices with high specific capacitance and excellent working life15. Supercapacitors as emerging energy storage devices combine the advantages of conventional capacitors and batteries and possess the high-power density, long cycle life, fast charge/discharge performance, safe reliability and environmentally friendly at the same time, resulting in the explosive-growth attention of researchers610. Electrode material is recognized as the core component of supercapacitors, which determines the comprehensive performance of supercapacitors4,1113. Therefore, novel electrode materials for supercapacitors emerge in an endless stream in recent years. However, most of the reported electrode materials present poor ionic conductivity, weak electronic conductivity or unstable crystal structure. The first two factors lead to the reversible redox reaction occurring only on the surface of electrode materials, further determining the low utilization rate of the electrode material. The third factor results in a short cycle life14,15. These have forced the researchers to improve the utilization rate and structure stability of electrode materials, which is also an enormous challenge.

In recent years, the heterojunction composites have been widely studied in photocatalysis and solar cells1618. It is owing to the construction of heterojunction realizing the advantages complementary and synergistic effects of two different materials14,19,20. Inspired by this innovation, the researchers also try to improve the comprehensive performance of electrode materials by building rich heterojunctions inside electrode materials and successfully prepared a series of heterojunction composites for supercapacitors (such as Ni3S2/Ni(OH)22123, NiS/Ni(OH)224,25, NiCo2S4/Ni(OH)22628 and CoS/Ni(OH)229), which combine the high ionic conductivity of Ni(OH)2 electrode attributing to its two-dimensional layered crystal structure and the excellent electronic conductivity of nickel sulfide owing to its compact crystal structure and high metallicity of sulfur atoms. These reports provide effective strategies for building novel electrode materials for supercapacitors. However, there arises another puzzle that the specific capacitance of electrode materials in two-electrode system is much lower than that in three-electrode system. This may be due to the fact that high ion and electron conductivity can only be achieved at heterojunctions and β-Ni(OH)2 without abundant intercalated anions as steady state Ni(OH)2 exhibits no satisfactory ionic conductivity. Therefore, the preparation of electrode materials with both high utilization rate and excellent stability still needs to be further studied, which is also of great significance. Based on previous research, α-Ni(OH)2 with abundant intercalated anions between two-dimensional layered crystal structure exhibits much better ionic conductivity than β-Ni(OH)230. α-Co(OH)2 with the similar crystal structure of α-Ni(OH)2 also exhibits excellent ionic conductivity. Besides, α-Co(OH)2 possesses ideal electronic conductivity31,32. But the anions between layered crystal structures can easily escape, especially in alkaline aqueous environment, which causes the unstable crystal structure of α-Ni(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2 and the reduction in the interlamellar spacing30,33,34. Meanwhile, the deformation stress is produced by the change of interlamellar spacing. The construction of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunctions can realize the complementarity of their advantages and further improve the utilization of electrode materials. In addition, their deformation stress may achieve synergistic effect and increase the structural stability of each other. So designing a mild strategy to construct the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction composite is expected to realize an electrode material with high utilization rate and stable structure.

In addition to the ionic and electronic conductivity and structural stability of the electrode material itself, the electronic transmission rate between electrode material and current collector and the ionic diffusion rate between electrode material and electrolyte also have a great influence on the performance of supercapacitor. The former can be achieved by combining electrode materials with highly conductive materials (such as active carbon, carbon nanotube, graphene, metal foam)6,13,35,36, especially nickel foam with three-dimensional (3D) conductive framework, light weight, strong mechanical properties, flexibility, which is often used as a template to prepare an integrated electrode material and as the conductive bridge between current collector and electrode material to improve electronic transmission performance5. The latter is usually achieved by using micro-nano fabrication techniques to obtain electrode materials with 3D hierarchical structure, which can improve the liquid-connection area between electrode material and electrolyte and further reduce concentration polarization37. Therefore, it is of great significance and much anticipated research to fabricate α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction composite with 3D hierarchical structure and assemble it on the surface of nickel foam to obtain integrated electrode materials without binder.

In this work, the α-Co(OH)2 nanowires and α-Ni(OH)2 nanosheets were assembled successively in situ on the surface of nickel foam by the two-step low temperature oscillation method, resulting in the successful preparation of 3D hierarchical α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods. The complementary advantages of conduction features and synergistic effect of deformation stress between α-Co(OH)2 and α-Ni(OH)2 endow the as-constructed heterojunction nanorods with high utilization rate and structural stability. The 3D highly conductive performance of nickel foam and 3D hierarchical structure of heterojunction composites construct an efficient electronic and ion transport network around the electrode materials. This ingenious design ensures α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods with a high capacitance retention rate of single electrode between three-electrode system and two-electrode system (the capacitance retention rate is 93.4% at 1 A g−1) and long cycle life (the capacitance retention rate is 123.6% at 5 A g−1 for 10000 cycles). In addition, the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC device also exhibits excellent rate performance (the capacitance retention rate is 70.2% from 1 to 20 A g−1) and idea energy density and power density (72.6 Wh kg−1 at 196.4 W kg−1 and 40.9 Wh kg−1 at 3491.8 W kg−1). The synthesis procedure is relatively very simple yet allows the formation of heterojunction nanorods with excellent comprehensive performance, which is interesting for large-scale production and utilization in supercapacitors.

Experimental Section

Synthesis of the α-Co(OH)2 nanowires

0.0436 g of cobalt nitrate and 1 g of urea were put into a mixture of ethanol and distilled water with a ratio of 2:3 and the solution was stirred to mix well. Then, the solution was moved into a test tube of 20 mL and nickel foam was placed in the solution under water bath equipment with vibration at 80 °C for 90 min. After that, surface of the reacted Ni foam was washed many times using distilled water and ethanol, respectively, and dried overnight in a 60 °C oven. The weight of Co(OH)2 nanowire was about 1 mg by comparing the weight before Ni foam.

Preparation of α-Ni(OH)2/α-Co(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods

The amount of nickel nitrate and urea used in the synthesis of heterojunction nanorods is the same as that of cobalt nitrate and urea, and the reaction temperature and solvent conditions are also similar to that used in the synthesis of cobalt hydroxide. The difference is that the second reaction takes less time than the first, which consume only 30 min. After the same operation and drying as the previous experiment, the weight of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods was about 1.4 mg by subtracting the weight of Ni foam.

Preparation of activated carbon (AC) electrode and device

Firstly, AC and polyvinylidene fluoride according to the mass ratio of 9:1 were put into a solution of ethanol and isopropyl alcohol with volume ratio of 1:1. Then, the blended liquid was ultrasonic for 30 min in the ultrasonic device so that the solution is distributed evenly. Next, the solution is trickled onto surface of 3D Ni foam by dropwise addition. After dropping the slurry, the Ni foam was dried by blowing in the oven of 60 °C. Next, by subtracting the weight before and after the Ni foam, the mass of the supported activated carbon is about 30 mg. Last, a self-assembling routine is used to design a device from AC and the active materials to test its application.

Material characterizations

Morphology of the sample were taken using Zeiss Merlin Compact scanning electron microscope (SEM) with own an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). TEM were verified by a JEOL JEM-2010 transmission electron microscope. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray powder diffractometer with Cu-Kα irradiation (10°–90°, a scan rate of 0.1° s−1 (2θ)). FTIR spectrums of the sample were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectrometer equipment (NicoletiS50, Thermo fisher scientific). The chemical feature on the surface of heterojunction was identified by XPS (Producer: Thermo Fisher, model number: K-Alpha).

Electrochemical characterization

The active material, Hg/HgO electrode and platinum electrode act as working electrode, reference electrode and counter electrode for three-electrode system respectively. AC, membrane and the active materials are blended into a sandwich-like device to evaluate its performance. The Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analyses of the all sample were tested using the 660E electrochemical workstation produced by shanghai Chenhua, china. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements were assessed by using the CT2001A LAND battery test equipment. The above all tests are performed in 2 M KOH solution.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1a offers schematic illustration of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods preparation. The α-Co(OH)2 nanowires as precursors were first fabricated via a mild (water and ethanol) and low-temperature (80 °C) water bath shaking method. Then the α-Ni(OH)2 nanosheet is based on the α-Co(OH)2 nanowire, the whole covers its surface and further forms α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods. Compared with smooth nanowires, heterojunction structure with the pleated sheet surface expands the contact between the material and electrolyte, further promoting the ion transport. The diffraction patterns of X-ray diffraction (XRD) are displayed in Fig. 1b. For nanowires sample, the critical position of the peak at about 12.3°, 33.58° and 39.5° are match with (003), (012) and (015) facets of α-Co(OH)2 respectively38. After the nickel hydroxide coating process, a strengthened peak appeared at 59.4°, which corresponds to (300) crystal plane of α-Ni(OH)239. This result confirms the α-Ni(OH)2 is successfully bonded to the surface of α-Co(OH)2. To fully prove the coexistence of α-Co(OH)2 and α-Ni(OH)2, the complex was further investigate by XPS test (the specific details are shown in Fig. S1)40,41. In addition, the presence of peaks at 44.6°, 51.9° and 76.4° are caused by introducing a small amount of nickel foam due to ultrasonic treatment for samples. The XRD data indicates that the as- fabricated Co(OH)2 and Ni(OH)2 all demonstrate alike structure with α phase. To further verify the internal structure of the synthesized materials, the FTIR spectrum of pure α-Co(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction hybrid are present in Fig. 1c. The bands located at 2924 cm−1 and 2852 cm−1, which belongs to the asymmetric and symmetric CH2 stretching of alkyl amine42. The bands at 3445 cm−1 and 640 cm−1 are due to the O-H stretching modes of interlayer water molecules and H-bound of OH groups, and the band at 1628 cm−1 is proved to the bending vibration mode of the water molecules43,44. The band appears at 1382 cm−1 is attributed to the existence of interlayer nitrate anion43. The 2220 cm−1 corresponds to the vibration of interlayer OCN−1 anions, which further confirm the presence of α-Ni(OH)2 because it only occurs in the example of nickel hydroxide45. The strong peaks at 2025 cm−1 corresponds to the absorption peak of carbonyl group46, and relative intensity of the peak in the heterojunction structure is much weaker, which illustrates that amount of NH2COO anions have been reduced after second reaction. A small loss of anions may help the heterogeneous material with a two-dimensional layered crystal structure opens up more space to facilitate ion of dissociation, leading to high ion transport rate. As can be seen from the schematic diagram of crystal structure of materials (Fig. 1d), the large space between layers obviously facilitates the shuttling and movement of ions, which fully confirms the advantages of layered materials. The TEM images verified α-Co(OH)2 nanowires existed within the flake structure of α-Ni(OH)2 (Fig. 1e–g), indicating the successful construction of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Abridged general view of preparation of α-Co(OH)2 nanowire and heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2, (b) corresponding XRD, (c) their FTIR spectrum, (d) lattice diagram of the intercalated structure, (eg) TEM images of heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods.

From the SEM images of α-Co(OH)2 (Fig. 2a), we can distinctly observe the ultrafine nanowires (about 50 nm in diameter). Figure 2b shows the low-magnification SEM image, which indicates that the α-Co(OH)2 nanowires are attached to the surface of Ni foam. As exhibited in Fig. 1c, the length of nanowires on nickel foam was approximately 1.2 um. Figure 2d shows that energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) image of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires. The appearance of characteristic peaks of elements confirms the existence of corresponding elements (Ni, Au, Co, N, C and O). In addition to Au and Ni elements (they come from the gold target and nickel foam, respectively), C and N elements arrives from the anions of the intercalated structure of α-Co(OH)2 material, which is consistent with the FTIR spectrum analysis. The Co:C:N:O elements ratio of the as-fabricated α-Co(OH)2 nanowires is 12.3: 23.4:9.3:54.9. The molar ratio of C element is higher than that of Co, which indicates that there are abundant anions in the two-dimensional spacing of α-Co(OH)2. In addition, the sample α-Co(OH)2 and Ni foam can be clearly recognized by SEM and mapping distribution in Fig. 2(e–g), which further indicates that the synthesized cobalt material grows uniformly on the nickel foam. The mapping measurements (Fig. 2h) show that the distribution of the Co, C, N and O elements. The skeleton structure formed by the distribution of the uniform color representing different elements are similar, which illustrates the α-Co(OH)2 present uniform distribution on the surface of nickel foam.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Morphology and elemental characterization of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires. (ac,e) SEM, (d) EDS, (fh) Mapping.

After the second reaction, the morphology of the nanowire turned into nanorods which was covered by nickel hydroxide nanoflakes (Fig. 3a). The diameter of nanorods is about 170 nm, which shows significant overall increases in diameter than the nanowires. In addition, surface of the nanorods possesses a plicate morphology, leading to rich ions contact between the surface and electrolyte. To further observe growth and distribution of the material, lower SEM image is displayed in Fig. 3b. Clearly, the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods are uniformly supported on the surface of Ni foam. This α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods material indicated a thickness of approximately 1 um (Fig. 3c), and the length is analogical to that of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires. EDX line scanning based nanorods was also detected. The distribution of higher Co and lower nickel element in the center section and lower Co and higher Ni in the edge area further confirms the heterojunction formed by cladding (Fig. 3d). The material that grows on the edge of Ni foam are further analyzed by EDX in Fig. 2e and quantity of the Ni, Co, C, N and O elemental are 18.7:4.9:19.1:8.2:49.2. The constituent of C and N are relatively high and the cause is the same as α-Co(OH)2. From Fig. 3g,h we can obtain the element include Co and Ni display similar layout, thus proving uniform arrangement of Ni and Co elements. Furthermore, by analyzing the element scanning results of the nickel-foam skeleton with α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction, which further confirms homogeneity of the growth of heterojunction materials (Fig. 3i,j).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The SEM images, EDX and Mapping of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods, (ac,e) SEM, (d) EDX line scanning, (e) EDX, (gj) Mapping.

All electrochemical behaviors of the sample as electrode materials are assessed in 2.0 M KOH aqueous electrolyte. The CV curves of α-Co(OH)2 (Fig. 4a,d) and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 (Fig. 4b,e) heterojunction with different scanning velocities (5 to 100 mVs−1) were performed to study the corresponding electrochemical behavior on the surface of the electrode material in three-electrode system and two-electrode system, respectively. All CV curves reveal well peaks shapes, which indicate a behavior with the reversible pseudo-capacitance on the surface of the electrode material (The detailed analysis can be seen in Fig. S2). The process can be proposed as follows15,30:

Co(OH)2+OHCoOOH+H2O+e 1
CoOOH+OHCoO2+H2O+e 2
Ni(OH)2+OHNiOOH+H2O+e 3

When increasing the scanning speed, an obvious phenomenon is that the position of anode peak and cathode peak move a small deviation towards the direction of positive pole and negative pole, respectively, which indicates only a small polarization of surface of the electrode materials occurs during the reversible reaction. Moreover, comparing the peak shapes of their CV curves, The α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction materials provided greater peak area, indicating that heterojunction materials contained higher specific value than α-Co(OH)2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a,b) The CV curves of Co(OH)2 nanowires and heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods at various scanning speed in three-electrode system, respectively, (c) the corresponding CV curves at 10 mV s−1 in three-electrode system, (d,e) the curves with various scanning speed of Co(OH)2 nanowires and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction in two-electrode system, respectively, (f) the CV curves at 10 mV s−1 in two-electrode system.

On the other hand, the two oxidation peaks of the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction finally converge into one peak (Fig. 4b,e) under three-electrode system and two-electrode system, this may due to the enhanced synergy between α-Co(OH)2 and α-Ni(OH)2 materials. To contrast the change further, the CV curves at sweep rate with 10 mV s−1 of α-Co(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction electrode materials in three-electrode system and two-electrode system are exhibited in Fig. 4c,f, respectively. Obviously, the coordinates of the oxidation peak and the reduction peak in their CV are shifted to the left, which can be considered as the result of the coordination between the two materials. Different from α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction, there are two pairs of clear redox peaks for α-Co(OH)2 in three-electrode system (Fig. 4c). The first pair peaks are present at 0.21 V and the second pair peaks are located at 0.47 V and 0.38 V, which are corresponding to the processes of the reaction Eqs (1 and 2), respectively. However, α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction electrode materials only display a pair peaks, which due to internal α-Co(OH)2 material is not activated and the corresponding current is low. When the scanning speed is increased, the two oxidation peaks can be observed (Fig. 4c), which may be attributed to excitation of α-Co(OH)2.

The electrochemical performances are further proved by Galvanostatic discharge-charge (GDC), rate performance test and cycle test. Figure (5a,b) display the discharge curves of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods from a potential of 0–0.5 V at 0.1 to 2 A g−1 of current densities in three-electrode system. The curves of the α-Co(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction all show the characteristics of the battery-like discharge platform during the discharge process, which further indicates that the charge storage of two materials mainly comes from the reversible redox reaction on surface of the electrode material. Comparing the discharge time of α-Co(OH)2 with that of the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction further, it is found that advantage of heterojunction materials is that they can release higher charges, which could be due to the complementary advantages of high ions transport in two-dimensional layered crystal structure and fast electron transport in α-Co(OH)2. According to GDC curves, the equation which is applied to calculate the mass specific capacitances of electrode is as follows47,48:

C=IΔt/mΔV 4

where C is the specific capacitance of single electrode, I (A) is the discharge current, Δt (s) is discharge time, m (g) is the mass of active material, and ΔV (V) is the potential window of measurement.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

GDC, rate performance test and cycle test of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods, respectively. (a,b) Discharge curves in three-electrode system (c) their rate performance in three-electrode system, (d,e) the discharge curves in two-electrode system, (f), rate performance in two-electrode system, (g) rate performance of single electrode of two materials in two-electrode system, (h) cycling stability and coulombic efficiency of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods.

The specific capacitances at different current density are show in Fig. 5c. The specific capacitance of α-Co(OH)2 nanowires are calculated by formula (4). The value of specific capacitance is 648.3, 597.6, 567.1, 536.0, 496.7, 475.3 and 469.8 F g−1 at current density of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 A g−1, respectively, and which retains 72.5% of its initial specific capacitance. When the current density returns to 0.1 A g−1, the specific capacitance still holds high initial capacitance retention with 90%. For heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 nanorods, which show a specific capacitance with 981.5, 979.2, 964.7, 950.3, 887.3, 872.85 and 854.3 F g−1 at same current density with α-Co(OH)2, respectively, yielding a 87% of initial capacitance-retention ratio, 95.2% capacitance retention is still kept when the material undergo rate cycle from high current density. The α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction exhibit much higher specific capacitance, rate performance and stability than that of pure α-Co(OH)2.

In addition, in order to assess the performance of electrode material in practical applications, the α-Co(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction were used as positive materials and AC were chosen as negative materials to assembled to two-electrode device (ASC). The GDC curves of α-Co(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 are shown in Fig. 5d,e, respectively, and two discharge voltage plateaus can be observed in the voltage window of 0–1.6 V, which indicate the discharge behavior mainly comes from pseudocapacitances. Moreover, discharge time of the heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC device is significantly higher than single α-Co(OH)2. The capacitance of heterojunctionα-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC and α-Co(OH)2//AC device can be computed to be 207.2, 175.8, 151.1, 150.9, 147.8, 145.6 (70.2% of capacity retention) and 124.4, 102.4, 84.2, 77.8, 74.1, 71.8 F g−1 (57.7% of capacity retention) at current density of 1, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 A g−1 by GCD cures, respectively. The heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC devices display much higher specific capacitance and rate performance, which are attributed to the complementary advantages of large ions contact in intercalated structure and high electron rate of α-Co(OH)2 electrode, well contact between material and current collector and the unique surface morphology with plicated structure, leading to a high utilization. For a comparison, the Fig. 5g provide the rate capacitance of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction single electrode and α-Co(OH)2 single electrode in device. The values in heterojunction are 828.8, 703.2, 604.4, 603.6, 591.2, 582.4 F g−1 and 609.6, 527.2, 452.5, 422.8, 410.4, 404.8 F g−1 from 1 to 20 A g−1, respectively. The value (828.8) is close to capacitance of three-electrode system at 1 A g−1 current density, further indicating the heterojunction achieve a high utilization because of construction of the high-efficiency ion and speedy electron transmission.

In order to prove that the electrode exhibit excellent performance. Table 1 lists the comparison between this work and some Ni(OH)2-based or Co(OH)2-based in previous literature, which can be reflected that the values in three-electrode system are lower than those reported, but a highest specific capacitance is displayed in two-electrode system, implying a enough utilization of the electrode.

Table 1.

Comparison of the capacitance between this work and some reported Ni(OH)2-based or Co(OH)2 based.

Electrode material Capacitance retention rate of single electrode@Current density (From three-electrode system to two-electrode system) Reference
Ni(OH)2-Co(OH)2 31.2%@1 A g−1 11
Co-Ni(OH)2/Ni3S2 18.0%@1 A g−1 22
NiCo2S3@Ni(OH)2@ppy 14.3%@1.56 A g−1 26
Ni(OH)2 18.4%@1 A g−1 52
Co3O4/CoS/Ni(OH)2@Co 26.19%@10 mA cm−2 53
Ni(OH)2/Mn2O3 20.6%@1 A g−1 54
Ni3S2@ Co(OH)2@Ni 20.5%@0.33 A g−1 58
Ni(OH)2 32.0%@1 A g−1 59
NiCoP @C@Ni(OH)2 22.4%@1 A g−1 55
(Ni-Co-S)/Co(OH)2 35.2%@1 A g−1 56
CoMoO4@Ni(OH)2 61.7%@1 A g−1 60
RGO/α-Ni(OH)2 22.5%@1 A g−1 61
Ni-Co-S/G 32.7%@1 A g−1 57
FeOF/Ni(OH)2 27.7%@1 A g−1 62
Mg(OH)2/Ni(OH)2 35.1%@1 A g−1 63
Co-α-Ni(OH)2/RGO 17.1%@1 A g−1 64
MWCNT/amor-Ni(OH)2/PEDOT:PSS 22.0%@5 mV s−1 65
α-Co(OH)2@α-Ni(OH)2 93.4%@1 A g−1 This work

In the cycling test work, specific capacitance of α-Co(OH)2//AC device display decaying trend as the number of cycles increases at 5 A g−1 (Fig. 5h). This unsatisfactory phenomenon may be caused by the strain induced due to the anions breaking away from the interlayer, which leads to the collapse of the structure. In order to further verify hypothesis, morphology of the electrode material was tested after 7200 cycles of charge/discharge and the structure of the nanowires have been transformed to compacted bulk (Fig. S3). In order to better understand the change of two-dimensional layered structure of α-Co(OH)2 in charging and discharging process, The diagram is shown in Fig. 6a. Encouragingly, the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction complexes achieve an outstanding cycle stability after 10000 cycles at 5 A g−1 and a capacitance retention was up to 123.6%. An improvement of capacitance for hybrid material can be regard as activation of the active sites. This stable structure can be attributed to the mutual-support deformation stress between the layered structures of α-Ni(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2 effectively organized a stable heterojunction (Fig. 6b). The morphology of the heterojunction after 10000 cycles is further analyzed by SEM (Fig. S4), demonstrating well initial structure of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction material, which confirm the above conclusion. In addition, the heterojunction also delivers a high coulombic efficiency of 85.3%. The illustration diagram in Fig. 6c shows excellent performance which could be attributed to the synergistic complementarity of the microstructure in two aspects. Firstly, it realizes high concentration ion transport within interlaminar structures and rapid electron transport of α-Co(OH)2. Besides, fast transport channels by α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction and Ni foam of 3D conductive network are constructed with large numbers of ions contacting with electrode materials.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Explanation of poor cycle life of α-Co(OH)2. (b) The illustration diagram of excellent stability of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction, (c) abridged general view of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction with high performance.

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the α- Co(OH)2//AC and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC device were analyzed (0.01 to 105 Hz), as shown in Fig. 7a. The intersecting point with the real axis region can be regarded as conjunct resistance (Rs) in the high-frequency, including inherent resistance of the active materials, ionic resistance of electrolyte, and contact resistance between active material and current collector4951. The Rs values of the α-Co(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction are about 0.35 Ω and 0.36 Ω, respectively, illustrating high conductivity and small contact impedance. The high-frequency semi-circle (Rct) is attributed to the charge-transfer process of Faradic reactions locating at the electrode-electrolyte. The half-ring radius of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction material at high frequencies is smaller than that of α-Co(OH)2 itself, which indicate the rapid electronic transfer within the material. The slope of straight in low-frequency presents Warburg resistance (Zw), which can be interpreted as the result of diffusion of OH−1 ion in the electrolyte. The Angle between the straight lines of low-frequency region of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction material and the X-axis is close to 90°, which testifies the higher ion transfer rate on the surface of the electrode material. The reason for the low transmission impedance is that the construction of α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction enhances the complementary advantages of ion and electron transport in material each other, as well as the construction of continuous conductive skeleton between heterojunction material and collecting fluid, and the large ion contact between material and electrolyte. The energy density (E) and power density (P) as crucial parameters are used to judge its practical application. The calculation formulas are listed below:

E=0.5C(ΔV)2/3.6 5
P=3600E/ΔV 6

where C represents the specific capacitance (F g−1), ΔV is the potential window in two-electrode system (1.6 V), Δt is the discharging duration (s) of the device.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) EIS of the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 and α-Co(OH)2. (b) Their Ragone plot.

The energy density and power density can be calculated by the formula listed above (Eqs 5 and 6), which are delivered in Fig. 7b. The Ragone plot of heterojunction α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2//AC device reflects a high energy density values of 72.6 Wh kg−1 at power density of 196.4 W kg−1 and energy density of 40.9 Wh kg−1 at power density of 3491.8 W kg−1, which are obviously higher than Ni(OH)2//AC (40.9 Wh kg−1 at 405 W kg−1)52, Co3O4/CoS/Ni(OH)2//AC (25.4 Wh kg−1 at 81.8 W kg−1)53, Ni(OH)2/Mn2O3//AC (41.6 Wh kg−1 at 799.4 W kg−1)54, NiCoP@C/Ni(OH)2//AC (49.5 Wh kg−1 at 399.8 W kg−1)55, Ni1-Co2-S/Co(OH)2//AC (48.8 Wh kg−1 at 800 W kg−1)56 and Ni-Co-S//G (43.3 Wh kg−1 at 800 W kg−1)57. All these results prove an enormous potential to apply the heterojunction material for low cost energy storage device.

Conclusion

In summary, the α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods arrays on Ni foam is successfully synthesized by a facile and mild nanotechnology in large-scaled industrialization. The α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction structure with two-dimensional crystal intercalation structure expands the complementary advantages of ion transport and electron transport between the two materials. Meanwhile, the heterojunction material also integrates the fluid-collecting device with high electron transport and utilizes the own advantages of nanomaterials, so that the heterojunction material can achieve a high utilization rate with a capacitance retention rate of 93.4% at 1 A g−1 for single electrode (based two-electrode system and three-electrode system) and long cycle life (the capacitance retention rate is 123.6% at 5 A g−1 for 10000 cycles). In addition, a good rate performance (70.2% of capacitance retention from 1 to 20 A g−1), a high energy density (72.6 Wh kg−1 at 196.4 W kg−1 and 40.9 Wh kg−1 at 3491.8 W kg−1) and cycling stability can be came down to the following ways: (1) The complementary advantages between abundant ion supply of α-Ni(OH)2 and ideal conductance of α-Co(OH)2 further enhance ions and electron transport rate. (2) The materials reveal plicate morphology with a large surface and a large intercalated structure from each material, which deepen utilization of active sites. (3) Ni foam as conductive substrates combine the steadily heterojunction structure constructs a continuous conductive frame, which further guarantees the rapid electron transport. (4) The α-Ni(OH)2 is compactly fixed to the surface of α-Co(OH)2, the mutual deformation stress ensures that the layered structure of the two materials can be stable to each other. The α-Co(OH)2/α-Ni(OH)2 heterojunction nanorods arrays on Ni foam open up a fascinating prospect for designing supercapacitor with excellent performance using a simple and mild method in larger-scale preparation.

Supplementary information

Surpporting Imformation (7.3MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1804126, U1804129, 21671205, 21771164 and U1407103), the Collaborative Innovation Centre of Henan Textile and Clothing Industry, the Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province (Grant No. 164100510007 and CXTD2015018).

Author Contributions

Shao-jie Zhou finished all the experiments and manuscript. Wu-tao Wei, Ying-ying Zhang and Shi-Zhong Cui revised the manuscript. Wei-hua Chen and Li-Wei Mi designed the whole plan.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Weihua Chen, Email: chenweih@zzu.edu.cn.

Liwei Mi, Email: mlwzzu@163.com.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-49138-5.

References

  • 1.Martínez-Periñán E, et al. Antimonene: a novel 2D nanomaterial for supercapacitor applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;8:1702606. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen Z, et al. Confined assembly of hollow carbon spheres in carbonaceous nanotube: a spheres-in-tube Carbon nanostructure with hierarchical porosity for high-performance supercapacitor. Small. 2018;14:1704015. doi: 10.1002/smll.201704015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fan L, Lin K, Wang J, Ma R, Lu B. A nonaqueous potassium-based battery–supercapacitor hybrid device. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1800804. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krishnamoorthy K, Pazhamalai P, Kim SJ. Two-dimensional siloxene nanosheets: Novel high-performance supercapacitor electrode materials. Energy Environ. 2018;11:1595–1602. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00160J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun H, Ma Z, Qiu Y, Liu H, Gao G-G. Ni@NiO nanowires on nickel foam prepared via “acid hungry”strategy: high supercapacitor performance and robust electrocatalysts for Water Splitting Reaction. Small. 2018;14:1800294. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wei W, et al. α-Ni(OH)2/NiS1.97 heterojunction composites with excellent ion and electron transport properties for advanced supercapacitors. Nanoscale. 2019;11:6243–6253. doi: 10.1039/C9NR00962K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhao J, et al. A high-energy density asymmetric supercapacitor Based on Fe2O3 nanoneedle arrays and NiCo2O4/Ni(OH)2 hybrid nanosheet arrays grown on SiC nanowire networks as free-standing advanced electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018;8:1702787. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liao Y, Wang H, Zhu M, Thomas A. efficient supercapacitor energy storage using conjugated microporous polymer networks synthesized from buchwald-hartwig coupling. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1705710. doi: 10.1002/adma.201705710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang R, Xu C, Lee J-M. High performance asymmetric supercapacitors: new NiOOH nanosheet/graphene hydrogels and pure graphene hydrogels. Nano Energy. 2016;19:210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.10.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhu S, et al. Rational design of octahedron and nanowire CeO2@MnO2 core-shell heterostructures with outstanding rate capability for asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:14840–14843. doi: 10.1039/C5CC03976B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu J, et al. Microwave-incorporated hydrothermal synthesis of urchin-like Ni(OH)2–Co(OH)2 hollow microspheres and their supercapacitor applications. Electrochim. Acta. 2013;114:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pang H, et al. One-pot synthesis of heterogeneous Co3O4-nanocube/Co(OH)2-nanosheet hybrids for high-performance flexible asymmetric all-solid-state supercapacitors. Nano Energy. 2017;35:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang J, et al. Electroactive edge site-enriched nickel-cobalt Sulfide into graphene frameworks for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:1299–1307. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03633J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li J, Yang M, Wei J, Zhou Z. Preparation and electrochemical performances of doughnut-like Ni(OH)2–Co(OH)2 composites as pseudocapacitor materials. Nanoscale. 2012;4:4498–4503. doi: 10.1039/c2nr30936j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li M, et al. Heterostructured Ni(OH)2–Co(OH)2 composites on 3D ordered Ni-Co nanoparticles fabricated on microchannel plates for advanced miniature supercapacitor. J. Alloy Compd. 2014;589:364–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang R, et al. Quasi-Polymeric Metal-organic framework UiO-66/g-C3N4 heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light irradiation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;2:1500037. doi: 10.1002/admi.201500037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wei X, et al. Facile in situ synthesis of plasmonic nanoparticles-decorated g-C3N4/TiO2 heterojunction nanofibers and comparison study of their photosynergistic effect for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution. Nanoscale. 2016;8:11034–11043. doi: 10.1039/C6NR01491G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xing Y, et al. New fullerene design enables efficient passivation of surface traps in high performance p-i-n hetero junction perovskite solar Cells. Nano Energy. 2016;26:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei W, et al. Urchin-like Ni1/3Co2/3(CO3)1/2(OH)·0.11H2O for Ultrahigh-rate electrochemical supercapacitors: structural evolution from solid to hollow. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:40655–40670. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b12392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu J, et al. Co3 O4 nanowire@MnO2 ultrathin nanosheet core/shell srrays: a new vlass of high-performance pseudocapacitive Materials. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:2076–2081. doi: 10.1002/adma.201100058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou W, et al. One-step synthesis of Ni3S2 nanorod@Ni(OH)2 nanosheet core–shell nanostructures on a three dimensional graphene network for high-performance supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:2216–2221. doi: 10.1039/C3EE40155C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ye L, et al. Serpent-cactus-like Co-doped Ni(OH)2/Ni3S2 hierarchical structure composed of ultrathin nanosheets for use in efficient asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5:1603–1613. doi: 10.1039/C6TA09547J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cao Y-Q, et al. Self-formed porous Ni(OH)2 on Ni3S2/Ni foam during electrochemical cycling for high performance supercapacitor with ultrahigh areal capacitance. Electrochim. Acta. 2019;303:148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Patil AM, Lokhande AC, Shinde PA, Kim JH, Lokhande CD. Vertically aligned NiS nano-flakes derived from hydrothermally prepared Ni(OH)2 for high performance supercapacitor. J. Energ. Chem. 2018;27:791–800. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hou L, et al. Electrochemically induced transformation of NiS nanoparticles into Ni(OH)2 in KOH aqueous solution toward electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim. Acta. 2011;56:7454–7459. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liang M, Zhao M, Wang H, Shen J, Song X. Enhanced cycling stability of hierarchical NiCo2S4@Ni(OH)2@PPy core-cell nanotube arrays for aqueous asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018;6:2482–2493. doi: 10.1039/C7TA10413H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nguyen VH, Lamiel C, Shim J-J. 3D hierarchical mesoporous NiCo2S4@Ni(OH)2 core-shell nanosheet arrays for high performance supercapacitors. New J. Chem. 2016;40:4810–4817. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ00267F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wan H, et al. NiCo2S4 porous nanotubes synthesis via sacrificial templates: high-performance electrode martials of supercapacitors. ErystEngComm. 2013;15:7649–7651. doi: 10.1039/c3ce41243a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li S, et al. In situ synthesis of 3D CoS nanoflake/Ni(OH)2 nanosheet nanocomposite structure as a candidate supercapacitor electrode. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:145401. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/14/145401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Du H, Jiao L, Cao K, Wang Y, Yuan H. Polyol-mediated synthesis of mesoporous α-Ni(OH)2 with enhanced supercapacitance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface. 2013;5:6643–6648. doi: 10.1021/am401341h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mehrabad JT, Aghazadeh M, Maragheh MG, Ganjal MR, Norouzi P. α-Co(OH)2 nanoplates with excellent supercapacitive performance: Electrochemical preparation and Characterization. Mater. Lett. 2016;184:223–226. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qu L, et al. Interwoven three-dimensional architecture of cobalt oxide nanobrush-graphene@NixCo2x(OH)6x for high-performance supercapacitors. Nano Lett. 2015;15:2037–2044. doi: 10.1021/nl504901p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jin H, et al. Fe incorporated α-Co(OH)2 nanosheet with remarkably improved activity towards oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5:1078–1084. doi: 10.1039/C6TA09959A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Du Y, Ok KM, O’Hare D. A kinetic study of the phase conversion of layered cobalt hydroxides. J. Mater. Chem. 2008;18:4450–4459. doi: 10.1039/b809085h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang P, et al. Fractal (NixCo1−x)9Se8 nanodendrite arrays with highly exposed (oıī) surface for wearable, all-solid-state supercapacitor. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018;26:1801392. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang JT, Liu S, Pan GL, Li GR, Gao XP. A 3D hierarchical porous α-Ni(OH)2/graphite nanosheet composite as an electrode material for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:1524–1529. doi: 10.1039/C3TA13578K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cao BL, Xu F, Liang Y-Y, Li H-L. Preparation of the novel nanocomposite Co(OH)2/ultra-stable Y zeolite and its application as a supercapacitor with high energy density. Adv. Mater. 2004;16:1853–1857. doi: 10.1002/adma.200400183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang R, Yan X, Lang J, Zheng Z, Zhang P. A hybrid supercapacitor based on flower-like Co(OH)2 and urchin-like VN electrode materials. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:12724–12732. doi: 10.1039/C4TA01296H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu J, Chen S, Zhou H, Wang X. Fabrication of a low defect density graphene–nickel hydroxide nanosheet hybrid with enhanced electrochemical performance. Nano Res. 2012;5:11–19. doi: 10.1007/s12274-011-0179-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guo X, et al. Core/shell design of efficient electrocatalysts based on NiCo2O4 nanowires and NiMn LDH Nanosheets for rechargeable Zinc-Air Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018;6:10243–10252. doi: 10.1039/C8TA02608D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Han M, et al. Fabricating 3D macroscopic graphene-based architectures with outstanding flexibility by the novel liquid drop/colloid flocculation approach for energy storage applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:21991–22001. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b02942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang L, et al. Layered α-Co(OH)2 nanocones as electrode materials for pseudocapacitors: Understanding the effect of interlayer space on electrochemical activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:2758–2764. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201202786. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xiao T, et al. Ni(OH)2 nanosheets grown on graphene-coated nickel foam for high-performance pseudocapacitors. J. Alloy Compd. 2013;549:147–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gund GS, Dubal DP, Jambure SB, Shinde SS, lokhande CD. Temperature influence on morphological progress of Ni(OH)2 thin films and its subsequent effect on electrochemical supercapacitive properties. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:4793–4803. doi: 10.1039/c3ta00024a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Soler-Illia GJAA, Joobbágy M, Regazzoni AE, Blesa MA. Synthesis of nickel hydroxide by homogeneous alkalinization. precipitation mechanism. Chem. Mater. 1999;11:3140–3146. doi: 10.1021/cm9902220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Magnuson RH, Zulu S, T’sai W-M, Ciering WP. Detection and characterization of radical cations resulting from the oxidation of methyl and acetyl iron complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980;102:6887–6888. doi: 10.1021/ja00542a056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhu S, et al. Structural directed growth of ultrathin parallel birnessite on β-MnO2 for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2018;12:1033–1042. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xu C, et al. Graphene-based electrodes for electrochemical energy storage. Energy Envviron. Sci. 2013;6:1388–1414. doi: 10.1039/c3ee23870a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhu Y, et al. Ultrathin nickel hydroxide and oxide nanosheets: synthesis, characterizations and excellent supercapacitor performances. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:5787. doi: 10.1038/srep05787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhu S, et al. Low charge-carriers Scattering 3-Dimensional alpha-MnO2/beta-MnO2 networks for ultrahigh-rate asymmetrical supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019;2:1051–1059. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhu S, Zhang J, Ma J, Zhang Y, Yao K. Rational design of coaxial mesoporous birnessite manganese dioxide/amorphous-carbon nanotubes arrays for advanced asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Power Sources. 2015;278:555–561. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.liu F, et al. Synthesis of self-assembly 3D porous Ni(OH)2 with high capacitance for hybrid supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;269:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhu Z, et al. Ni counterpart-assisted synthesis of nanoarchitectured Co3O4/CoS/Ni(OH)2@Co electrode for supercapacitor. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;284:444–453. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Feng L, et al. 3D sponge-like porous structure of Mn2O3 tiny nanosheets coated on Ni(OH)2/Mn2O3 nanosheet arrays for quasi-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors with high performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;339:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zong Q, et al. Three-dimensional coral-like NiCoP@C@Ni(OH)2 core-shell nanoarrays as battery-type electrodes to enhance cycle stability and energy density for hybrid supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;361:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xu T, Li G, Zhao L. Ni–Co–S/Co(OH)2 nanocomposite for high energy density all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;336:602–611. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yang J, et al. Electroactive edge site-enriched nickel–cobalt sulfide into graphene frameworks for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:1299–1307. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03633J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen F, Wang H, Ji S, Linkov V, Wang R. Core-shell structured Ni3S2@Co(OH)2 nano-wires grown on Ni Foam as binder-free Electrode for asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;345:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang D, et al. Morphology-controlled synthesis of hierarchical mesoporous α-Ni(OH)2 microspheres for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Alloy Compd. 2018;737:238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang X, et al. Facile synthesis of hierarchical CoMoO4@Ni(OH)2 core-shell nanotubes for bifunctional supercapacitors and oxygen electrocatalysts. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019;789:684–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bag S, Raj CR. Layered Inorganic-organic hybrid material based on reduced graphene oxide and α-Ni(OH)2 for high performance supercapacitor Electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:17848–17856. doi: 10.1039/C4TA02937B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang M, et al. Novel core-shell FeOF/Ni(OH)2 hierarchical nanostructure for all-solid-state flexible supercapacitors with enhanced performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27:1701014. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201701014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xie M, et al. In situ grown Mg(OH)2-derived hybrid α-Ni(OH)2 for highly stable supercapacitor. ACS Energy Lett. 2016;1:814–819. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang L, Song S, Shi H. One-pot methanol-mediated solvothermal synthesis of 3D porous Co-doped α-Ni(OH)2/RGO nanosheets as a high-performance pseudo-capacitance electrode. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018;751:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jiang W, et al. Ternary hybrids of amorphous nickel hydroxide-carbon nanotube-conducting polymer for supercapacitors with high energy density, excellent rate capability, and long cycle life. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015;25:1063–1073. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201403354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Surpporting Imformation (7.3MB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES