Abstract
This article presents magnetic mineral characteristics, trace metals, and REE geochemistry of river sediments that serve as inlets to Lake Limboto, Sulawesi, Indonesia related to article entitled “Lithogenic and anthropogenic components in surface sediments from Lake Limboto as shown by magnetic mineral characteristics, trace metals, and REE geochemistry” [1]. River sediments were obtained from three rivers, namely Alopohu, Bionga, and Talumelito. Sieved sediments were subjected to magnetic susceptibility measurements as well as geochemical analyses that include AAS analyses for trace metals and ICP-OES for REE. Extracted magnetic grains were also subjected to magnetic hysteresis analyses as well as XRD and SEM analyses. These data are invaluable in identifying the contribution of each river (and its catchment area) to the surface sediments of Lake Limboto.
Keywords: Lake limboto, Magnetic properties, Trace metals, REE, River sediments
Specifications Table
| Subject area | Geophysics |
| More specific subject area | Environmental magnetism |
| Type of data | Tables, Graphs, Figures |
| How data was acquired |
|
| Data format | Raw |
| Experimental factors | River sediments were sieved (using 325 mesh-size sieve) and then dried at room temperature to produce bulk samples. These bulk samples were subjected to magnetic susceptibility, trace metals, and REE analyses. Some bulk samples were also subjected to magnetic extraction using magnetic stirrer and then analyzed for magnetic hysteresis parameters as well as SEM and XRD analyses. All measurements and analyses were conducted at room temperature. |
| Experimental features | Magnetic susceptibility measurement was conducted at dual frequencies (470 Hz and 4700 Hz). Measured magnetic hysteresis parameters are Bc (coercive force), Bcr (coercivity of remanence), Ms (saturation magnetization) and Mrs (magnetic saturation remanence). Measured trace metals are Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Hg. Measured REE are La, Ce, Sc, Nd, Pr, and Gd. |
| Data source location | Rivers Alopohu, Bionga, and Talumelito in the vicinity of Lake Limboto in Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. |
| Data accessibility | The data are available with this article. |
| Related research article | Raghel Yunginger, Satria Bijaksana, Darharta Dahrin, Siti Zulaikah, Abd Hafidz, Kartika Hajar Kirana, Sudarningsih Sudarningsih, Mariyanto Mariyanto, and Silvia Jannatul Fajar, Lithogenic and Anthropogenic Components in Surface Sediments from Lake Limboto as Shown by Magnetic Mineral Characteristics, Trace Metals, and REE Geochemistry sediments, Geosciences 2018, 8, 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040116 |
Value of the data
|
1. Data
Fig. 1 shows the research area that include sampling points in the three rivers (Alopohu, Bionga, and Talumelito) around Lake Limboto. Samples were obtained from two different locations along each river. The first locations are the upstream and pristine parts while the second locations are near the lake side. For each river, these two locations are separated by residential areas, markets, and even hospital. Samples are denoted as Alu01 and Alu02 (for those from Alopohu), Bionga01 and Bionga02 (for those from Bionga), and Talumelito01 and Talumelito02 (for those from Talumelito). The mineral characteristics, trace metals, REE geochemistry of surface sediments in Lake Limboto has been reported elsewhere [1]. The properties have been widely used, among others, to distinguish anthropogenic components from the lithogenic components in lake [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] as well in suspended river sediments [7], [8], [9], [10].
Fig. 1.
Locations of sampling points (black triangles) along Alopohu (Alo01 and Alo02), Bionga (Bionga01 and Bionga02), and Talumelito (Talumelito01 and Talumelito02) rivers that serve as inlets to Lake Limboto. Shown also traditional markets, hospital and residential areas around Lake Limboto.
Table 1 shows the results of magnetic susceptibility measurements in terms of χLF (low frequency mass-specific magnetic susceptibility; measured at 470 Hz), χHF (high frequency mass-specific magnetic susceptibility; measured at 4700 Hz), and χFD% (frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility; defined as 100% × (χLF – χHF)/χLF). In general, the mass-specific magnetic susceptibilities of these three river sediments are much higher than that of the surface sediments in Lake Limboto [1]. Except for that of Talumelito River, the sediments near the lake are more magnetic than that from upstream locations implying that the rivers bring more magnetic anthropogenic components to the lake.
Table 1.
Results of magnetic susceptibility measurement for sediments from the three rivers. See text for the explanation.
| River | Location | Sample ID | χLF (10−8 m3/kg) | χHF (10−8 m3/kg) | χFD% (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopohu | upstream | Alo01 | 133.9 | 128.8 | 3.83 |
| lake side | Alo02 | 205.8 | 199.7 | 2.94 | |
| Bionga | upstream | Bionga01 | 162.2 | 158.6 | 2.25 |
| lake side | Bionga02 | 411.9 | 403.7 | 1.98 | |
| Talumelito | upstream | Talumelito01 | 211.4 | 202.9 | 4.04 |
| lake side | Talumelito02 | 168.2 | 159.6 | 5.11 |
Fig. 2 shows the typical magnetic hysteresis curves for the extracted magnetic grains represented that of Bionga01 and Bionga02. The curves in Fig. 2 show that the magnetization M saturates in the field H of less than 0.3T inferring the presence of magnetite (Fe3O4) as the predominant magnetic mineral. Moreover, the presence of magnetite (Fe3O4) in the extracted grains is verified by the X-Rays diffractograms shown in Fig. 3 for that of Bionga01 and Bionga02. Meanwhile, Table 2 shows the measured magnetic hysteresis parameters, i.e., Hc (coercive force), Hcr (coercivity of remanence), Ms (saturation magnetization) and Mrs (magnetic saturation remanence) for all samples.
Fig. 2.
Typical magnetic hysteresis curves of extracted represented by that of Bionga01 (a) and Bionga02 (b).
Fig. 3.
Typical X-Ray diffractograms of extracted grains represented by that of Bionga01 (a) and Bionga02 (b). The predominant mineral in the extracted grains is magnetite.
Table 2.
Shows the measured magnetic hysteresis parameters for sediments from the three rivers. See text for the explanation.
| River | Location | Sample ID | Hc (mT) | Hcr (mT) | Ms (emu/g) | Mrs (emu/g) | Hcr/Hc | Mrs/Ms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopohu | upstream | Alo01 | 15.8 | 17.3 | 16.7 | 3.5 | 1.09 | 0.21 |
| lake side | Alo02 | 5.0 | 19.8 | 24.2 | 5.3 | 3.95 | 0.22 | |
| Bionga | upstream | Bionga01 | 7.7 | 19.0 | 18.6 | 3.8 | 2.47 | 0.20 |
| lake side | Bionga02 | 4.3 | 18.4 | 40.4 | 7.0 | 4.29 | 0.17 | |
| Talumelito | upstream | Talumelito01 | 10.5 | 17.2 | 33.0 | 6.0 | 1.64 | 0.18 |
| lake side | Talumelito02 | 16.5 | 21.6 | 14.9 | 3.2 | 1.31 | 0.22 |
The morphologies of the extracted grains are shown in SEM images in Fig. 4. The grains from upstream area are typical of natural magnetite grains, but the grains from lake side areas (Alu02 and Bionga02) are typical for anthropogenic magnetite, including framboid magnetite caused by high temperature burning. The results of EDX (energy-dispersive X-rays) analyses on grains shown in Fig. 4 are listed in Table 3.
Fig. 4.
Morphologies of extracted grains from Alu01 (a), Alu02 (b), Bionga01 (c), Bionga02 (d), Talumelito01(e) and Talumelito02 (f). See text for further explanation.
Table 3.
Results of EDX analyses on extracted magnetic grains shown in Fig. 4.
| Element | Alopohu |
Bionga |
Talumelito |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alo01 | Alo02 | Bionga01 Mass% | Bionga02 | Talumelito01 | Talumelito02 | |
| C | 5.03 | 5.69 | 8.47 | 8.65 | 7.92 | 8.26 |
| N | 0.60 | 0.04 | 0.78 | |||
| O | 41.72 | 48.95 | 51.68 | 47.40 | 42.16 | 43.94 |
| F | 4.75 | 6.99 | 8.42 | 7.07 | 4.79 | 6.88 |
| Na | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.20 | ||
| Mg | 2.24 | |||||
| Al | 2.41 | 2.38 | 2.31 | 0.76 | 4.11 | 2.21 |
| Si | 0.41 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| P | 0.13 | 0.02 | ||||
| S | 0.07 | 0.02 | ||||
| Cl | 0.07 | 0.04 | ||||
| K | 0.09 | |||||
| Ca | 0.01 | |||||
| Ti | 6.98 | 5.09 | 3.17 | 4.96 | 4.29 | 3.69 |
| Mn | 0.08 | 0.07 | ||||
| Fe | 35.71 | 30.15 | 25.36 | 29.90 | 36.14 | 33.85 |
| Ni | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.19 | |||
| Cu | 0.45 | 0.09 | 0.16 | |||
| Zn | 0.22 | |||||
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Table 4 shows the concentration of trace metals (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Hg) in the sediments from the three rivers. Compared to that of surface sediments of Lake Limboto [1], the concentrations of trace metals in river sediments are much higher. For instance, the average Fe content in surface sediment samples from Lake Limboto is only 100 ppm for residential area and is only 115 ppm for non-residential area [1].
Table 4.
Concentration of trace metals for the sediments from the three rivers.
| River | Location | Sample ID | Fe (%) | Mn (ppm) | Cu (ppm) | Zn (ppm) | Hg (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopohu | upstream | Alo01 | 5.6 | 1543.7 | 67.0 | 95.7 | 47.2 |
| lake side | Alo02 | 5.3 | 1509.0 | 50.7 | 104.7 | 27.8 | |
| Bionga | upstream | Bionga01 | 6.6 | 1428.0 | 78.7 | 99.0 | 66.7 |
| lake side | Bionga02 | 5.8 | 1783.0 | 72.0 | 150.0 | 44.4 | |
| Talumelito | upstream | Talumelito1 | 5.0 | 1277.0 | 61.7 | 96.0 | 28.9 |
| lake side | Talumelito2 | 5.6 | 1264.3 | 57.0 | 97.3 | 36.1 |
Table 5 shows the concentration of and of REE (La, Ce, Sc, Nd, Pr, and Gd) in the sediments from the three rivers. Compared to that of surface sediments from Lake Limboto [1], the concentrations of REE in river sediments are only slightly higher. For instance, the average Nd content in surface sediment samples from Lake Limboto is 22.50 ppm for residential area and is only 29.50 ppm for non-residential area [1]. Compared to that of sediments from Linggi River in Malaysia, the concentrations of REE in this study is about the same level for Nd, and Pr but much lower for La, Ce, and Gd [11].
Table 5.
Concentration of REE for the sediments from the three rivers.
| River | Location | Sample ID | La (ppm) | Ce (ppm) | Sc (ppm) | Nd (ppm) | Pr (ppm) | Gd (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopohu | upstream | Alo01 | 10.1 | 27.2 | 19.8 | 38.9 | 6.5 | 1.4 |
| lake side | Alo02 | 12.9 | 26.8 | 19.4 | 40.4 | 9.8 | 3.2 | |
| Bionga | upstream | Bionga01 | 10.2 | 29.6 | 17.3 | 48.5 | 4.8 | 0.6 |
| lake side | Bionga02 | 11.9 | 27.8 | 18.2 | 43.2 | 9.7 | 16.3 | |
| Talumelito | upstream | Talumelito1 | 16.6 | 32.3 | 13.9 | 36.1 | 7.2 | 2.2 |
| lake side | Talumelito2 | 16.3 | 33.9 | 14.3 | 39.7 | 8.8 | 2.8 |
2. Experimental design, materials, and methods
Sampling of sedimentary samples was conducted in six locations (see Table 6 for the coordinates of the sampling points). Samples were sieved were sieved (using 325 mesh-size sieve) and then dried at room temperature to produce bulk samples. These bulk samples were subjected to magnetic susceptibility, trace metals, and REE analyses. Magnetic susceptibility measurement was carried out using a Bartington MS2 magnetic susceptibility meter with a dual-frequencies (470 Hz and 4700 Hz) MS2B sensor (Bartington Instrument Ltd., Oxford, UK). Analyses of trace metals’ concentrations were carried out by AAS (atomic absorption spectrometer) using a Varian AA280FS (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) while analyses of REE concentrations were by ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma atomic-optical emission spectrometry) using an Agilent 700/725 ICP-OES (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Some bulk samples were then subjected to magnetic extraction using magnetic stirrer [12]. The extracted magnetic grains were then analyzed for their magnetic hysteresis parameters using an Oxford Instrument 1.2H/CT/HT vibration sample magnetometer (VSM) (Oxford Instrument, Oxfordshire, UK). Later, the extracted magnetic grains were also analyzed for their mineral composition by XRD (X-Rays diffraction) analyses using Rigaku SmartLab X-Ray Diffractometer (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The morphologies of these grains were also studied under scanning electron microscope (SEM) using JEOL JSM-6510A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) that is also equipped with EDX (energy-dispersive X-Rays) apparatus. Table 6 lists the geographic locations of sampling points.
Table 6.
Geographic locations of sampling points.
| River | Location | Sample ID | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopohu | upstream | Alo01 | 0° 40′ 57.60″ S | 122° 51′ 13.79″ E |
| lake side | Alo02 | 0° 36′ 47.09″ S | 122° 57′ 14.10″ E | |
| Bionga | upstream | Bionga01 | 0° 41′ 32.20″ S | 122° 59′ 23.89″ E |
| lake side | Bionga02 | 0° 36′ 09.69″ S | 122° 58′ 45.19″ E | |
| Talumelito | upstream | Talumelito1 | 0° 37′ 37.70″ S | 123° 02′ 18.80″ E |
| lake side | Talumelito2 | 0° 36′ 32.60″ S | 123° 01′ 11.70″ E |
Acknowledgments
This study is supported financially by research grant from the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia to SB. Thanks are also due to the governments of Limboto Regency and Gorontalo Province for their permission to conduct research in the vicinity of Lake Limboto.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.Yunginger R., Bijaksana S., Dahrin D., Zulaikah S., Hafidz A., Kirana K.H., Sudarningsih S., Mariyanto M., Fajar S.J. Lithogenic and anthropogenic components in surface sediments from lake Limboto as shown by magnetic mineral characteristics, trace metals, and REE geochemistry. Geosciences. 2018;8:116. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tamuntuan G., Bijaksana S., King J., Russell J., Fauzi U., Maryunani K., Aufa N., Safiuddin L.O. Variation of magnetic properties in sediments from Lake Towuti, Indonesia, and its paleoclimate significance. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2015;420:163–172. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mecray E.L., King J.W., Appleby P.G., Hunt A.S. Historical trace metal accumulation in the sediments of an urbanized region of the Lake Champlain watershed, Burlington, Vermont. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2001;125:201–230. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang T., Liu Q., Chan L., Liu Z. Magnetic signature of heavy metals pollution of sediments: case study from the East Lake in Wuhan, China. Environ. Geol. 2007;52:1639–1650. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zeng L., Ning D., Xu L., Mao X., Chen X. Sedimentary evidence of environmental degradation in sanliqi lake, daye city (A typical mining city, Central China) Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015;95:317–324. doi: 10.1007/s00128-015-1606-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang T., Liu Q., Zeng Q., Chan L. Environmental magnetic responses of urbanization processes: evidence from lake sediments in East Lake, Wuhan, China. Geophys. J. Int. 2009;179:873–886. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Famera M., Babek O., Grygar T.M., Novakova T. Distribution of heavy metal contamination in Regulated River-channel deposits: a magnetic susceptibility and grain-size approach; River Morava, Czech Republic. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013;224:1525. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jordanova D., Hoffmann V., Fehr K.T. Mineral magnetic characterization of anthropogenic magnetic phases in the Danube River sediments (Bulgarian part) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004;221:71–89. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu Y., Sun Q., Yi L., Yin X., Wang A., Li Y., Chen J. The source of natural and anthropogenic heavy metals in the sediments of the Minjiang Rivers Estuary (SE China): implications for historical pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;493:729–736. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aidona E., Grison H., Petrovsky E., Kazakis N., Papadopoulou L. Magnetic characteristics and trace elements concentration in soils from Anthemountas River basin (North Greece): discrimination of different sources of magnetic enhancement. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016;75:1375. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Elias M.S., Ibrahim S., Samuding K., Kantasamy N., Dominic Daung A.J., Ab-Rahman S., Hashim A. Dataset on concentration and enrichment factor of rare earth elements (REEs) in sediments of Linggi River, Malaysia. Data in Brief. 2019;25:103983. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Novala G.C., Sudarningsih, Kirana K.H., Fajar, Mariyanto S.J., Bijaksana S. Testing the effectiveness of mechanical magnetic extraction in riverine and lacustrine sediments. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019;1204 [Google Scholar]




