Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2019 Aug 30;75(Pt 9):1379–1382. doi: 10.1107/S2056989019011289

Crystal structure of (E)-3-(2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phen­yl)-1-(2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one

Maadh Jumaah a, Huey Chong Kwong b, Melati Khairuddean a,*
PMCID: PMC6727044  PMID: 31523470

The title compound consists of a 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phenyl ring, a 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl ring and a prop-2-en-1-one connecting bridge. The overall conformations of the title compound are discussed and compared with those of related structures. In the crystal, mol­ecules are consolidated by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H⋯O inter­actions.

Keywords: crystal structure, chalcone, enone bridge, O—H⋯O inter­action, data survey

Abstract

The title chalcone derivative, C19H20O5, adopts a trans configuration with respect to the olefinic C=C double bond. The 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phenyl ring is coplanar with the attached enone bridge [torsion angle = −179.96 (14)°], where this plane is nearly perpendicular to the 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl ring [dihedral angle = 75.81 (8)°]. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked into chains propagating along [010] by an O—H⋯O hydrogen bond. These chains are further connected into centrosymmetric dimer chains via weak C—H⋯O inter­actions. The conformations of related chalcone derivatives are surveyed and all of these structures adopt a skeleton with two almost orthogonal aromatic rings.

Chemical context  

Chalcones (1,3-di­aryl­prop-2-en-1-ones) are precursors of flavonoids and isoflavonoids in the plant kingdom (Ni et al., 2004; Sahu et al., 2012). Structurally, they consist of two aryl groups linked by an α, β-unsaturated ketone system (Ibrahim et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2013), whereby the aryl groups can carry a variety of substituents such as hydroxyl, meth­oxy and alkenyl groups, which are by far the most commonly encountered ones in nature. With their structural simplicity and the associated ease of synthesis, chalcone compounds have attracted a considerable amount of attention because of their important pharmacological properties such as anti-oxidative (Aoki et al., 2008), anti-inflammatory (Israf et al., 2007), anti-gout (Jang et al., 2014), anti-histaminic (Yamamoto et al., 2004), anti-obesity (Birari et al., 2011), anti-protozoal (Chen et al., 1993), hypnotic (Cho et al., 2011) and anti-spasmodic (Sato et al., 2007) effects. In a continuation of our ongoing research on the properties of various chalcone derivatives (Sim et al., 2017, Kwong et al., 2018), we report herein the synthesis and crystal structure determination of the title compound, C19H20O5, (I).graphic file with name e-75-01379-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The title chalcone derivative (I), crystallizes in the centrosymmetric triclinic space group P Inline graphic and its asymmetric unit consists of a single unique mol­ecule (Fig. 1). This mol­ecule is constructed of two substituted aromatic rings (2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phenyl and 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl) and an enone (–CH=CH—(C=O)–) connecting bridge. In the enone bridge, the C6—C7, C8—C9 and C9—C10 bond lengths of 1.446 (2), 1.441 (2) and 1.504 (2) Å, respectively, confirm their single-bond character, whereas the C7=C8 and C9=O2 bond lengths of 1.340 (2) and 1.2255 (17) Å, respectively, confirm the presence of a double bond. In addition, the C6—C7—C8 and C8—C9—C10 bond angles of 128.71 (13) and 119.47 (11)°, respectively, are consistent with the sp 2 hybridization of atoms C7, C8 and C9 (Kerr et al., 2001; Loghmani-Khouzani et al., 2009; Grealis et al., 2013). As the olefinic double bond C7=C8 adopts a trans configuration [C6—C7—C8—C9 torsion angle = −179.96 (14)°], the structural conformation of (I) can be defined by three torsion angles. The torsion angles between the 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phenyl ring and the olefinic double bond (C5—C6—C7—C8, τ 1), between the olefinic double bond and the carbonyl group (C7—C8—C9—C10, τ 2) and between the carbonyl group and the 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl ring (C8—C9—C10—C11, τ 3) are shown in Fig. 2. The torsion angles τ 1 and τ 2 are approximately ±180° or 0° [τ 1 = −179.15 (14)° and τ 2 = −0.8 (2)°], indicating that the 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phenyl ring and the enone bridge are coplanar. In contrast, the carbonyl group is nearly perpendicular to the attached 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl ring, as τ 3 is 76.87 (19)°. In general, the mol­ecule of (I) can be considered as two individual planes, the first comprising the 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phenyl ring and the enone bridge [maximum deviation of 0.0021 (2) Å for atom C19], and the second the 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl ring [maximum deviation of 0.0059 (2) Å for atom C18]. These two mean planes form a dihedral angle of 75.84 (4)°, hence the mol­ecule of (I) possesses a skeleton with two almost orthogonal aromatic rings.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The title mol­ecule with the atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% ellipsoid probability level.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

General chemical diagram showing torsion angles, τ 1, τ 2 and τ 3.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal, the mol­ecules are linked into chains parallel to the b axis via classical O1—H1B⋯O2i hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3 a). These chains are further connected into inversion-related dimeric chains by weak C17—H17A⋯O1ii inter­molecular inter­actions (Fig. 3 b, Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Views of (a) a chain of mol­ecules linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (shown as cyan dotted lines) and (b) a dimeric chain formed by weak C—H⋯O inter­actions (shown as magenta dotted lines). Symmetry code: (i) x, −1 + y, z; (ii) 1 − x, −y, −z. Hydrogen atoms not involved in these inter­actions are omitted for clarity.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1B⋯O2i 0.82 1.88 2.6653 (15) 161
C17—H17A⋯O1ii 0.96 2.70 3.520 (2) 144

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD version 5.40, last update May 2019; Groom et al., 2016) using (E)-3-phenyl-1-(2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one as the reference moiety resulted in three chalcone structures containing 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl with different substituents. They include (E)-3-(R 1)-1-(2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one, where R 1 = 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl (BAGXEN; Kerr et al., 2001), 6-nitro­benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl (BUFMOF; Loghmani-Khouzani et al., 2009) and 4-meth­oxy­phenyl (GESRAZ; Grealis et al., 2013). As in (I), the mol­ecules of all these structures adopt a trans configuration with respect to C=C double bond (C6—C7—C8—C9 torsion angles = 175.5–179.1°). Although, τ 1 for all of the structures indicates an anti-periplanar conformation (Table 2), in BUFMOF it deviates slightly from planarity (τ 1 = 152.7°) whereas τ 1 for the other mol­ecules is approximately 180° (τ 1 = 174.1–176.0°, Table 2). Regarding the enone bridge, the torsion angle τ 2 indicates that all of the structures are relatively planar (τ 2 = −4.8–7.6°). The torsion angles τ 3 always almost indicate a perpendicular arrangement (τ 3 = 67.6–88.6°). This might arise from the steric repulsion between the carbonyl group and the attached 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phenyl ring. This results in an overall L-shape for all of the structures, with the dihedral angle between the mean planes of the two aromatic rings being 61.6–80.4°.

Table 2. Selected torsion and dihedral angles (°).

The dihedral angle is that between the mean planes of the aromatic rings.

Compound R1 τ 1 (C5—C6—C7—C8) τ 2 (C7—C8—C9—C10) τ 3 (C8—C9—C10—C11) Dihedral angle
(I) 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phen­yl −179.2 (1) −0.8 (2) 76.9 (2) 75.8 (1)
BAGXEN 2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl 174.1 −4.8 88.6 80.4
BUFMOF 6-nitro­benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl 153.7 6.8 67.6 61.6
GESRAZ 4-meth­oxy­phen­yl 176.0 7.6 −82.2 79.0

Note: values for the minor occupancy component of GESRAZ are not given.

Synthesis and crystallization  

A reaction scheme for the synthesis of the title compound is given in Fig. 4. A solution of tri­meth­oxy­aceto­phenone (2 mmol) in 20 mL MeOH, LiOH (2.4 mmol) and 2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­benzaldehyde (1.6 mmol) was stirred at 368 K and the reaction progress was monitored by TLC. The reaction was quenched with diluted hydro­chloric acid to pH = 6 and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with aqueous NaHCO3, water, and brine, successively. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and then concentrated to provide the product as a brown powder. The residue was purified by column chromatography with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (10:1) as an eluent to afford the target compound (Yan et al., 2016). Slow evaporation from an aceto­nitrile–water mixture provided X-ray quality crystals for the target chalcone compound.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Reaction scheme for the synthesis of the title chalcone.

( E )-3-(2-hy­droxy-4-methyl­phen­yl)-1-(2,4,6-tri­meth­oxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (I)

Brown powder, yield 84.1%. m.p. 503–506 K. IR (cm−1): 3283 (O—H), 2929 and 2842 (Csp 3—H), 1603 (C=O), 1586 and 1457 (C=C). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6) δ, ppm: 10.02 (s, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.30 (s, 2H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.70 (s, 6H), 2.23 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d 6) δ, ppm: 194.3, 162.2, 158.4, 157.1, 142.5, 140.2, 128.8, 127.9, 121.1, 118.9, 117.0, 111.9, 91.6, 56.2, 55.9, 21.6. CHN Elemental analysis: Calculated for C19H20O5: C, 69.50; H, 6.14; N. Found: C, 67.81; H, 5.72; N, 0.00.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 . C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) or 1.5U eq(C–meth­yl). The O-bound hydrogen was located from difference-Fourier maps and refined freely with O—H = 0.82 Å.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C19H20O5
M r 328.35
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P Inline graphic
Temperature (K) 296
a, b, c (Å) 6.8072 (3), 8.5792 (4), 15.8010 (7)
α, β, γ (°) 100.365 (1), 99.433 (1), 104.984 (1)
V3) 855.09 (7)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.09
Crystal size (mm) 0.57 × 0.25 × 0.21
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII DUO CCD area-detector
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2012)
T min, T max 0.908, 0.950
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 33448, 5018, 3199
R int 0.030
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.706
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.052, 0.171, 1.05
No. of reflections 5018
No. of parameters 217
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.27, −0.19

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2012), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2015), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019011289/jj2214sup1.cif

e-75-01379-sup1.cif (1.1MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019011289/jj2214Isup2.hkl

e-75-01379-Isup2.hkl (399.3KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019011289/jj2214Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1946810

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C19H20O5 Z = 2
Mr = 328.35 F(000) = 348
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.275 Mg m3
a = 6.8072 (3) Å Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.5792 (4) Å Cell parameters from 6606 reflections
c = 15.8010 (7) Å θ = 2.5–25.7°
α = 100.365 (1)° µ = 0.09 mm1
β = 99.433 (1)° T = 296 K
γ = 104.984 (1)° Block, brown
V = 855.09 (7) Å3 0.57 × 0.25 × 0.21 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII DUO CCD area-detector diffractometer 5018 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 3199 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.030
φ and ω scans θmax = 30.1°, θmin = 1.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2012) h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.908, Tmax = 0.950 k = −12→12
33448 measured reflections l = −22→22

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.171 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0776P)2 + 0.1331P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
5018 reflections Δρmax = 0.27 e Å3
217 parameters Δρmin = −0.19 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O1 0.64130 (18) 0.04792 (12) 0.33273 (7) 0.0582 (3)
H1B 0.622234 −0.051206 0.330607 0.087*
O2 0.5594 (2) 0.71937 (13) 0.28620 (9) 0.0750 (4)
O3 0.82818 (19) 0.58546 (15) 0.17162 (8) 0.0718 (4)
O4 0.3336 (2) 0.11733 (16) −0.04471 (7) 0.0741 (4)
O5 0.18978 (18) 0.33623 (15) 0.22860 (8) 0.0653 (3)
C1 0.7621 (3) 0.3898 (2) 0.52362 (11) 0.0587 (4)
H1A 0.765072 0.500561 0.536913 0.070*
C2 0.8168 (3) 0.3175 (2) 0.59089 (11) 0.0636 (4)
H2A 0.856694 0.379893 0.648810 0.076*
C3 0.8134 (2) 0.1518 (2) 0.57349 (10) 0.0576 (4)
C4 0.7548 (2) 0.0621 (2) 0.48690 (10) 0.0536 (4)
H4A 0.752792 −0.048531 0.474238 0.064*
C5 0.6988 (2) 0.13422 (17) 0.41849 (9) 0.0462 (3)
C6 0.7017 (2) 0.30075 (17) 0.43524 (9) 0.0461 (3)
C7 0.6399 (2) 0.37021 (17) 0.36199 (9) 0.0462 (3)
H7A 0.600214 0.297697 0.306638 0.055*
C8 0.6322 (2) 0.52507 (17) 0.36314 (10) 0.0530 (4)
H8A 0.670606 0.601882 0.417082 0.064*
C9 0.5668 (2) 0.57758 (17) 0.28428 (10) 0.0506 (3)
C10 0.5066 (2) 0.45590 (17) 0.19626 (10) 0.0474 (3)
C11 0.3145 (2) 0.33383 (18) 0.16927 (10) 0.0496 (3)
C12 0.2590 (2) 0.2222 (2) 0.08827 (10) 0.0553 (4)
H12A 0.130137 0.141133 0.070877 0.066*
C13 0.3996 (3) 0.23348 (19) 0.03331 (10) 0.0539 (4)
C14 0.5911 (2) 0.35440 (19) 0.05781 (10) 0.0528 (4)
H14A 0.683280 0.361673 0.020255 0.063*
C15 0.6426 (2) 0.46422 (18) 0.13936 (10) 0.0502 (3)
C16 0.9764 (3) 0.6078 (3) 0.11824 (14) 0.0747 (5)
H16A 1.098130 0.697163 0.149806 0.112*
H16B 1.014327 0.507669 0.103655 0.112*
H16C 0.917128 0.633866 0.065061 0.112*
C17 0.4721 (4) 0.1217 (3) −0.10396 (12) 0.0798 (6)
H17A 0.408006 0.034279 −0.156077 0.120*
H17B 0.501338 0.226820 −0.119882 0.120*
H17C 0.599756 0.106887 −0.075655 0.120*
C18 −0.0021 (3) 0.2085 (3) 0.21029 (14) 0.0741 (5)
H18A −0.072792 0.225952 0.257352 0.111*
H18B −0.087708 0.210054 0.155938 0.111*
H18C 0.024368 0.102923 0.205183 0.111*
C19 0.8715 (3) 0.0699 (3) 0.64692 (12) 0.0785 (6)
H19A 0.908022 0.148913 0.702583 0.118*
H19B 0.755129 −0.021899 0.646508 0.118*
H19C 0.988302 0.030616 0.638320 0.118*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O1 0.0834 (8) 0.0397 (5) 0.0461 (6) 0.0191 (5) 0.0077 (5) 0.0007 (4)
O2 0.1156 (11) 0.0394 (6) 0.0798 (8) 0.0294 (6) 0.0388 (8) 0.0135 (5)
O3 0.0660 (7) 0.0665 (7) 0.0692 (8) −0.0007 (6) 0.0305 (6) −0.0029 (6)
O4 0.0803 (9) 0.0796 (8) 0.0461 (6) 0.0084 (7) 0.0123 (6) −0.0022 (6)
O5 0.0577 (7) 0.0702 (7) 0.0659 (7) 0.0118 (5) 0.0271 (6) 0.0090 (6)
C1 0.0631 (9) 0.0534 (8) 0.0508 (8) 0.0140 (7) 0.0116 (7) −0.0047 (7)
C2 0.0594 (9) 0.0766 (11) 0.0441 (8) 0.0141 (8) 0.0094 (7) −0.0018 (7)
C3 0.0434 (8) 0.0790 (11) 0.0486 (8) 0.0153 (7) 0.0102 (6) 0.0146 (7)
C4 0.0527 (8) 0.0538 (8) 0.0543 (8) 0.0169 (7) 0.0119 (7) 0.0113 (7)
C5 0.0454 (7) 0.0463 (7) 0.0431 (7) 0.0118 (6) 0.0099 (6) 0.0030 (6)
C6 0.0432 (7) 0.0440 (7) 0.0464 (7) 0.0097 (5) 0.0117 (6) 0.0018 (6)
C7 0.0476 (7) 0.0406 (7) 0.0466 (7) 0.0112 (5) 0.0130 (6) 0.0009 (5)
C8 0.0607 (9) 0.0413 (7) 0.0523 (8) 0.0129 (6) 0.0163 (7) −0.0009 (6)
C9 0.0586 (8) 0.0357 (6) 0.0600 (9) 0.0137 (6) 0.0246 (7) 0.0074 (6)
C10 0.0557 (8) 0.0403 (7) 0.0507 (8) 0.0185 (6) 0.0173 (6) 0.0108 (6)
C11 0.0525 (8) 0.0491 (8) 0.0530 (8) 0.0198 (6) 0.0169 (6) 0.0152 (6)
C12 0.0529 (8) 0.0563 (9) 0.0522 (8) 0.0117 (7) 0.0082 (7) 0.0113 (7)
C13 0.0638 (9) 0.0550 (8) 0.0426 (7) 0.0206 (7) 0.0073 (7) 0.0103 (6)
C14 0.0597 (9) 0.0568 (8) 0.0475 (8) 0.0214 (7) 0.0192 (7) 0.0136 (7)
C15 0.0539 (8) 0.0446 (7) 0.0543 (8) 0.0156 (6) 0.0169 (7) 0.0113 (6)
C16 0.0663 (11) 0.0762 (12) 0.0799 (13) 0.0099 (9) 0.0345 (10) 0.0137 (10)
C17 0.1025 (15) 0.0791 (12) 0.0497 (10) 0.0168 (11) 0.0256 (10) 0.0018 (8)
C18 0.0613 (10) 0.0826 (13) 0.0820 (13) 0.0132 (9) 0.0271 (9) 0.0297 (10)
C19 0.0684 (11) 0.1119 (16) 0.0570 (11) 0.0267 (11) 0.0087 (9) 0.0291 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C5 1.3613 (16) C8—H8A 0.9300
O1—H1B 0.8200 C9—C10 1.504 (2)
O2—C9 1.2255 (17) C10—C15 1.390 (2)
O3—C15 1.3626 (19) C10—C11 1.392 (2)
O3—C16 1.4151 (19) C11—C12 1.383 (2)
O4—C13 1.3636 (18) C12—C13 1.391 (2)
O4—C17 1.432 (2) C12—H12A 0.9300
O5—C11 1.3651 (18) C13—C14 1.385 (2)
O5—C18 1.419 (2) C14—C15 1.384 (2)
C1—C2 1.371 (2) C14—H14A 0.9300
C1—C6 1.403 (2) C16—H16A 0.9600
C1—H1A 0.9300 C16—H16B 0.9600
C2—C3 1.392 (3) C16—H16C 0.9600
C2—H2A 0.9300 C17—H17A 0.9600
C3—C4 1.381 (2) C17—H17B 0.9600
C3—C19 1.511 (2) C17—H17C 0.9600
C4—C5 1.387 (2) C18—H18A 0.9600
C4—H4A 0.9300 C18—H18B 0.9600
C5—C6 1.3998 (19) C18—H18C 0.9600
C6—C7 1.446 (2) C19—H19A 0.9600
C7—C8 1.340 (2) C19—H19B 0.9600
C7—H7A 0.9300 C19—H19C 0.9600
C8—C9 1.441 (2)
C5—O1—H1B 109.5 C11—C12—C13 118.68 (15)
C15—O3—C16 119.21 (13) C11—C12—H12A 120.7
C13—O4—C17 117.54 (14) C13—C12—H12A 120.7
C11—O5—C18 118.63 (14) O4—C13—C14 123.74 (14)
C2—C1—C6 121.65 (15) O4—C13—C12 114.86 (14)
C2—C1—H1A 119.2 C14—C13—C12 121.39 (14)
C6—C1—H1A 119.2 C15—C14—C13 118.62 (14)
C1—C2—C3 120.75 (15) C15—C14—H14A 120.7
C1—C2—H2A 119.6 C13—C14—H14A 120.7
C3—C2—H2A 119.6 O3—C15—C14 123.97 (13)
C4—C3—C2 118.51 (15) O3—C15—C10 114.45 (13)
C4—C3—C19 120.07 (17) C14—C15—C10 121.57 (14)
C2—C3—C19 121.41 (16) O3—C16—H16A 109.5
C3—C4—C5 121.08 (15) O3—C16—H16B 109.5
C3—C4—H4A 119.5 H16A—C16—H16B 109.5
C5—C4—H4A 119.5 O3—C16—H16C 109.5
O1—C5—C4 121.92 (13) H16A—C16—H16C 109.5
O1—C5—C6 117.19 (12) H16B—C16—H16C 109.5
C4—C5—C6 120.89 (13) O4—C17—H17A 109.5
C5—C6—C1 117.12 (14) O4—C17—H17B 109.5
C5—C6—C7 118.98 (12) H17A—C17—H17B 109.5
C1—C6—C7 123.89 (13) O4—C17—H17C 109.5
C8—C7—C6 128.71 (13) H17A—C17—H17C 109.5
C8—C7—H7A 115.6 H17B—C17—H17C 109.5
C6—C7—H7A 115.6 O5—C18—H18A 109.5
C7—C8—C9 122.77 (13) O5—C18—H18B 109.5
C7—C8—H8A 118.6 H18A—C18—H18B 109.5
C9—C8—H8A 118.6 O5—C18—H18C 109.5
O2—C9—C8 122.17 (14) H18A—C18—H18C 109.5
O2—C9—C10 118.36 (14) H18B—C18—H18C 109.5
C8—C9—C10 119.47 (12) C3—C19—H19A 109.5
C15—C10—C11 118.35 (13) C3—C19—H19B 109.5
C15—C10—C9 120.27 (13) H19A—C19—H19B 109.5
C11—C10—C9 121.37 (13) C3—C19—H19C 109.5
O5—C11—C12 124.18 (14) H19A—C19—H19C 109.5
O5—C11—C10 114.43 (13) H19B—C19—H19C 109.5
C12—C11—C10 121.39 (14)
C6—C1—C2—C3 −0.3 (3) C18—O5—C11—C12 5.6 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.4 (2) C18—O5—C11—C10 −174.96 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C19 −179.49 (16) C15—C10—C11—O5 −179.09 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.5 (2) C9—C10—C11—O5 0.4 (2)
C19—C3—C4—C5 179.37 (14) C15—C10—C11—C12 0.4 (2)
C3—C4—C5—O1 179.78 (14) C9—C10—C11—C12 179.85 (13)
C3—C4—C5—C6 0.5 (2) O5—C11—C12—C13 179.48 (13)
O1—C5—C6—C1 −179.66 (13) C10—C11—C12—C13 0.1 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C1 −0.3 (2) C17—O4—C13—C14 0.2 (2)
O1—C5—C6—C7 1.36 (19) C17—O4—C13—C12 −179.57 (15)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −179.32 (13) C11—C12—C13—O4 179.14 (13)
C2—C1—C6—C5 0.2 (2) C11—C12—C13—C14 −0.6 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C7 179.15 (14) O4—C13—C14—C15 −178.99 (14)
C5—C6—C7—C8 −179.68 (14) C12—C13—C14—C15 0.8 (2)
C1—C6—C7—C8 1.4 (2) C16—O3—C15—C14 3.0 (2)
C6—C7—C8—C9 −179.96 (14) C16—O3—C15—C10 −178.38 (15)
C7—C8—C9—O2 179.67 (15) C13—C14—C15—O3 178.26 (14)
C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.8 (2) C13—C14—C15—C10 −0.3 (2)
O2—C9—C10—C15 75.90 (19) C11—C10—C15—O3 −178.96 (13)
C8—C9—C10—C15 −103.68 (16) C9—C10—C15—O3 1.6 (2)
O2—C9—C10—C11 −103.56 (17) C11—C10—C15—C14 −0.3 (2)
C8—C9—C10—C11 76.87 (19) C9—C10—C15—C14 −179.73 (13)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1B···O2i 0.82 1.88 2.6653 (15) 161
C17—H17A···O1ii 0.96 2.70 3.520 (2) 144

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by Universiti Sains Malaysia grant 304.PKIMIA.6316171.

References

  1. Aoki, N., Muko, M., Ohta, E. & Ohta, S. (2008). J. Nat. Prod. 71, 1308–1310. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Birari, R. B., Gupta, S., Mohan, C. G. & Bhutani, K. K. (2011). Phytomedicine, 18, 795–801. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Bruker (2012). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Chen, M., Christensen, S. B., Blom, J., Lemmich, E., Nadelmann, L., Fich, K., Theander, T. G. & Kharazmi, A. (1993). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37, 2550–2556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Cho, S., Kim, S., Jin, Z., Yang, H., Han, D., Baek, N. I., Jo, J., Cho, C. W., Park, J. H., Shimizu, M. & Jin, Y. H. (2011). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 413, 637–642. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Grealis, J. P., Müller-Bunz, H., Ortin, Y., Casey, M. & McGlinchey, M. J. (2013). Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 332–347.
  7. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Ibrahim, M., AlRefai, M., Abu-El-Halawa, R., Tashtoush, H., Alsohaili, S. & Masad, M. (2012). Jordan. J. Chem. 7, 115–123.
  9. Israf, D. A., Khaizurin, T. A., Syahida, A., Lajis, N. H. & Khozirah, S. (2007). Mol. Immunol. 44, 673–679. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Jang, I. T., Hyun, S. H., Shin, J. W., Lee, Y. H., Ji, J. H. & Lee, J. S. (2014). Mycobiology. 42, 296–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Kerr, P. J., Pyke, S. M., Ward, A. D. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2001). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 216, 601.
  12. Kumar, C. S., Loh, W. S., Ooi, C. W., Quah, C. K. & Fun, H. K. (2013). Molecules, 18, 11996–12011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Kwong, H. C., Rakesh, M. S., Chidan Kumar, C. S., Maidur Shivaraj, R., Patil Parutagouda, S., Quah Ching, K., Win, Y.-F., Parlak, C. & Chandraju, S. (2018). Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 233, 349–360.
  14. Loghmani-Khouzani, H., Abdul Rahman, N., Robinson, W. T., Yaeghoobi, M. & Kia, R. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.
  16. Ni, L., Meng, C. Q. & Sikorski, J. A. (2004). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 14, 1669–1691.
  17. Sahu, N. K., Balbhadra, S. S., Choudhary, J. & Kohli, D. V. (2012). Curr. Med. Chem. 19, 209–225. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Sato, Y., He, J. X., Nagai, H., Tani, T. & Akao, T. (2007). Biol. Pharm. Bull. 30, 145–149. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  21. Sim, A., Chidan Kumar, C. S., Kwong, H. C., Then, L. Y., Win, Y.-F., Quah, C. K., Naveen, S., Chandraju, S., Lokanath, N. K. & Warad, I. (2017). Acta Cryst. E73, 896–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Yamamoto, T., Yoshimura, M., Yamaguchi, F., Kouchi, T., Tsuji, R., Saito, M., Obata, A. & Kikuchi, M. (2004). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 68, 1706–1711. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Yan, J., Chen, J., Zhang, S., Hu, J., Huang, L. & Li, X. (2016). J. Med. Chem. 59, 5264–5283. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019011289/jj2214sup1.cif

e-75-01379-sup1.cif (1.1MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019011289/jj2214Isup2.hkl

e-75-01379-Isup2.hkl (399.3KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019011289/jj2214Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1946810

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES