Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019 Mar 5;60:153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.01.012

Why recombinant antibodies — benefits and applications

Koli Basu a,#, Evan M Green b,#, Yifan Cheng b,c, Charles S Craik a
PMCID: PMC6728236  NIHMSID: NIHMS1523214  PMID: 30849700

Abstract

Antibodies (Abs) are ubiquitous reagents for biological and biochemical research and are rapidly expanding into new therapeutic areas. They are one of the most important probes for determining how proteins function under normal and pathophysiological conditions. Abs are required for quantification of targets, detection of temporal and spatial patterns of protein expression in cells and tissues, and identification of interacting partners and their biological activities. Their remarkable specificity and unique binding properties can facilitate three-dimensional structure determination using X-ray crystallography and electron cryomicroscopy. While hybridoma technology that involves animal immunization is often productive, many antigen targets do not generate useful Abs. This is particularly true if unique states of the target or critical non-immunogenic target sequences need to be recognized by the Abs. By using the methods of recombinant antibody generation, identification, and engineering, these ‘hybridoma-refractory’ antigens can be readily targeted. Specific, reproducible, and renewable recombinant Abs are proving to be invaluable reagents in applications ranging from biological discovery to structure determination of challenging macromolecules.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1523214-f0001.jpg

Comparing hybridoma and recombinant antibodies

Monoclonal, target-specific antibodies (Abs) are routinely developed through hybridoma technology1 or by biopanning with recombinant antibody libraries 2,3. For hybridoma antibody development, B-cells from animals are harvested several weeks after they have been inoculated with the antigen. Immortalized hybridoma cells are generated through the fusion of B-cells with a myeloma cell line. Each hybridoma cell normally secretes a single species of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and the secreted IgGs are used in binding assays, such as ELISA or FACS, to select for cell lines producing antigen binders4,5. Since the antibody generation and affinity maturation occurs in vivo through the animals immune response, these Abs can have high specificity and affinity6.

A common theme in any antibody campaign is that the investigator will ‘get what they screen for’. A significant drawback of hybridoma antibody campaigns is that the antigen will undergo proteolytic degradation to initiate the antibody-generating immune response (Fig 1) and the derived Abs may not recognize the native form of the antigen. Another disadvantage is that the Fragment of antigen-binding domain (Fab) (Fig 2) obtained by IgG proteolysis7 may not retain the same antigen-binding properties as the IgG. A polypeptide sequence that does not generate an immune response or three-dimensional epitopes can make antigens particularly hybridoma-refractory. Furthermore, the utility and reliability of numerous commercial Abs, many of which are generated through hybridoma technology, can be limited since the specificity and cross reactivity of Abs vary from vendor-to-vendor and lot-to-lot8.

Figure 1: Antigen presentation in hybridoma antibody generation versus recombinant antibody display.

Figure 1:

Target antigen (red) follows hybridoma immunoglobulin G generation path (top) or recombinant antibody (rAb) generation path (bottom). In top path, the pink cell is a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) presenting cell, the purple cell is a T-cell, the blue cell is a B-cell, the black receptor is a MHC, and the grey receptor is a T-cell receptor (TCR). In bottom path, the grey oval particles are display library members (yeast or phage) with colored displayed rAb and the yellow cell is Escherichia coli.

Figure 2: Different formats and important applications of recombinant antibodies.

Figure 2:

Various antibody formats are shown in the center of the circle: immunoglobulin G (IgG), fragment of antigen-binding domain (Fab), single-chain variable fragment (scFv), and nanobody (Nb). IgGs are composed of two unique polypeptide chains, a heavy chain (H) and a light chain (L) based on their molecular weights. Each chain has one variable region (VH, VL). The light chain has one constant region (CL) and the heavy chain has three constant regions (CH1-3). Two heavy chains and two light chains come together to make an IgG. A Fab is composed of VH, VL, CH1 and CL. An scFv is a single polypeptide chain composed of both VH and VL connected with a flexible linker. A Nb consists of only a VH. Heavy chains are colored in dark blue, light chains are colored in cyan, and antibody targets are colored in red.

Many of the pitfalls of hybridoma antibody generation are resolved through biopanning with recombinant antibody libraries9,10. These libraries are generated by cloning synthetic or naive Fabs, single-chain variable fragments (scFvs), or nanobodies (Nbs) (Fig 2) into phage or yeast display vectors1114. Antigen-binding Abs are enriched through several rounds of selection by solid-phase2 or by flow cytometry15,16 (Fig 1). Biopanning parameters can be selected for the desired antibody-antigen binding conditions. The ability to counter select against non-desired epitopes is a particularly powerful advantage of the biopanning approach. Counter selection can be accomplished using different conformation states, homologues, or specific domains14,17. Since the entire process is done in vitro, temperature, buffer conditions, antigen ligand concentrations, and oligomeric assembly can be readily controlled. With proper selection conditions, the antigen has a much lower chance of being altered through the recombinant biopanning process compared to the hybridoma approach of animal inoculation. Recently, advances in automating the recombinant antibody biopanning process has greatly reduced the effort, time, and cost required18.

Another advantage of using a recombinant antibody library is that binders from the biopanning process can be easily characterized through DNA sequencing. Once the sequence of the antibody is known it is essentially immortalized, renewable, and can be produced in recombinant expression systems. Recombinant expression of Fabs, scFVs, and Nbs in Escherichia coli is a fraction of the cost of hybridoma Abs generation19. Recombinant Abs can be engineered to have additional functionalities including tags for purification or immunoprecipitation, conjugation sites to increase chemical space, or mutagenesis to map the determinants of antigen recognition. The antibody sequence allows for in vitro affinity maturation, mimicking an immune response, to select Abs with higher affinity and lower off-rate20. Abs derived from recombinant affinity maturation campaigns often have affinities 10-50 times higher than their parent21. Engineering of therapeutic antibody candidates can improve their pharmaceutical effects, such as prolongation of half-life to increase their efficacy22. Further efforts to develop therapeutic Abs that take advantage of recombinant technologies have recently been reviewed23.

Functional applications of recombinant antibodies

Since the advent of biopanning by phage and yeast display, recombinant Abs have become invaluable reagents for therapeutics, imaging, and understanding protein-protein mediated mechanisms of action (Fig 2). Therapeutic Abs typically prevent binding of ligands to receptors by either blocking the ligand or the receptor24. Abs against the immune checkpoint protein programmed death (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) are recent examples25. Currently, there are several antibody therapeutics against these two targets for various cancer treatments that are either approved or in clinical trials26, indicating the importance of this growing field. And with this, the development of tools for preclinical assessment of patient responses to immunotherapy is also emerging, such as immunopositron emission tomography (immunoPET)27 where Abs towards the immune checkpoint proteins are conjugated with a radiotracer and used for in vivo imaging.

Recombinant Abs that recognize specific states of a protein can potentially be used as diagnostic tools. An example of this is a recombinant active-site-specific Fab developed for the transmembrane serine protease, matriptase17. Active matriptase is a biomarker for tumorigenesis. The recombinant Fab distinguished cancer from non-cancer cell lines in vitro and in colon cancer sections from human tissue micro arrays. In vivo imaging of colon cancer patient-derived xenograft models showed tumor uptake of the radio-labelled antibody, indicating that this Fab could be used for noninvasive tumorigenesis evalution28.

Abs are also used for exploring the roles of specific intercellular and extracellular proteins. Blocking protein-protein interactions by Abs can help dissect the mechanism of action of the target of interest. By converting Abs to scFvs, intracellular signaling pathways can be probed since scFvs are properly folded in the reducing cytoplasmic environment, whereas IgGs and Fabs are not. An example of this is the intracellular expression of an scFv which was generated against (β-arrestins (βarrs), an important regulator of GPCR (G protein-coupled receptor) signal transduction29. This scFv selectively disrupts βarrs/clatherin interaction and inhibits agonist-induced endocytosis of GPCRs without affecting other molecular pathways. Another such example of Fab-based modulation is of the Vif protein complex, which is an HIV protein complex that counteracts the antiviral effects of the host apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide 3 (APOBEC3) immune proteins30. In vitro experiments with the Fabs, and in vivo experiments with transiently expressed scFvs, showed that Vif uses a multi-pronged approach involving both degradation-dependent and - independent mechanisms to suppress APOBEC3-innate immunity.

Cell classification and profiling, using a technique referred to as phage-antibody next generation sequencing (PhaNGS)31, demonstrated yet another innovative use of recombinant Abs. In this technique, a collection of defined Fabs that bind specifically to previously identified targets of interest are displayed on phage and pooled to make a customized library. Fab-phage bound to cells are identified through next-generation sequencing of a barcode region in the Fab. It is expected that PhaNGS will be useful for observing surface protein changes in disease-state cells and for identification of new combinatorial biomarkers and drug targets.

Recombinant antibodies in X-ray crystallography

Abs are used extensively in structural biology to help determine high-resolution structures of antibody-antigen complexes owing to their ability to facilitate crystal packing of challenging targets, act as a fiducial marker to aid in particle orientation in electron microscopy (EM), and trap specific conformational states (Fig. 2). In the following sections, we highlight the broad utility of Abs for structural studies with a particular emphasis on recombinant Abs.

In order to determine the three-dimensional structure of a protein using X-ray crystallography, it is necessary to generate well-ordered crystals that diffract to high resolution. For this to occur, crystal contacts must be made between individual macromolecules to generate a three-dimensional lattice. Formation of crystal contacts can be impeded by a lack of suitable exposed surface area or by conformational flexibility. This is particularly true of detergent-solubilized membrane proteins as the detergent micelle often precludes crystal contacts between transmembrane helices32. Abs have been used to assist in the crystallization of membrane proteins since it was observed that the lattice contacts of membrane-protein crystal structures are often mediated by polar surfaces33. In the case of the potassium channel KcsA co-crystallization with a Fab was necessary to achieve the resolution required to assign potassium ion coordination in the central pore34.

While early antibody-assisted crystallization studies used hybridoma derived Abs, there are a number of significant advantages for recombinant Abs. Since full length IgGs are typically too flexible to generate well-ordered crystals, Fabs must be generated through proteolytic cleavage, which is not required with recombinant Abs. For most labs, purification of the milligram quantities of recombinant Abs required for a crystallography campaign is more straightforward and reproducible compared to hybridomas-based expression and purification. Conformationally-specific Abs are easier to generate with recombinant approaches given the in vitro nature of the biopanning method making it possible to select for Abs in the presence of ligands or binding-partners. Recombinant Abs have been used extensively in GPRC structural biology making it possible to trap active states and complexes with interaction partners35,36. Use of recombinant Abs is not restricted to membrane proteins as they have been used for co-crystallization of a number of soluble proteins including a module of the polyketide synthetase 6-deoxyethronolide B synthase37 and matriptase38,39. To increase the utility of recombinant Abs for X-ray crystallography, recent work has been done to engineer the scaffold with desired properties, such as the use of ‘elbow locking’ mutations to rigidify the link between the constant and variable domains to increase crystallizability40.

Recombinant antibodies in cryoEM

Recent advances in electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM) have made it possible to solve near-atomic resolution structures of proteins41. While several well-behaved samples have achieved resolutions better than 2 Å, achieving the resolution required to build de novo models for new samples is still challenging42. Before the ‘resolution-revolution’, Abs were used as fiducial markers for EM by immunogold labeling43 but more recently the use of recombinant Fabs as fiducial markers for single-particle cryoEM of small and challenging targets was demonstrated44. This technique has been used to determine a number of high resolution structures that were recalcitrant to high-resolution structure determination without a Fab 45,46. Fabs have a number of advantages for this task. Unlike other methods of increasing molecular weight, such as green fluorescent protein or maltose-binding protein fusions47, Fabs can specifically recognize and bind rigid three-dimensional epitopes thereby facilitating high-resolution refinement44.

The characteristic shape of Fabs in both negative stain and cryoEM provides a means for assessing the quality of medium-low resolution structures in addition to high-resolution alignment44. As is the case with X-ray crystallography, recombinant Abs have also been crucial for the structure determination of several GPCR complexes4851, integrin52, and ABC transporters53 by trapping specific conformations. In addition to conformational selectivity, Fabs can alter the orientation distribution of vitrified samples. In the recent structure of TMEM16A, a calcium-activated chloride channel, the sample in detergent had a significant preferred orientation bias resulting in a structure with anisotropic resolution54. By merging datasets with and without a Fab, it was possible to increase the resolution from 3.8 to 3.4 Å, as the two samples had different orientation distributions resulting in a final structure that was more isotropic and higher-resolution.

The low signal-to-noise ratio of cryoEM data makes refinement of psuedosymmetric complexes particularly challenging as protomers may not align properly if differences between them are small. Fabs have been used to overcome this problem in several systems as a symmetry-breaking fiducial mark. For example, Fabs against the heterodimeric ABC transporter TmrAB were used to increase the molecular weight of the relatively small membrane protein while simultaneously breaking a pseudo two-fold symmetry allowing for the unambiguous assignment of the individual protomers55. In the case of TmrAB, the estimated angular accuracy was significantly higher for the TmrAB-Fab complex relative to the apo sample. This same approach has been applied to several heteromeric ion channels56,57. Future engineering of antibody scaffolds may specifically tailor them to the unique requirements of single particle cryoEM with reduced flexibility and increased desired orientation distributions58. Since the theoretical minimum molecular weight required for high-resolution alignment is estimated to be around 50 kDa, approximately the same molecular weight of a Fab, it is conceivable that any Fab-antigen complex will be suitable for cryoEM in the future59.

Conclusions

The lack of high-quality Abs for many macromolecules and their complexes limits our ability to determine protein structure, to detect proteins in pathology samples, and to image and treat diseases. The availability of potent, specific, reproducible, and readily renewable probes for the entire proteome, including hybridoma-refractory antigens, could transform the study of biology and enable the discovery of new therapeutics. Recombinant antibody technology, in addition to existing hybridoma techniques, provides a robust pipeline for the generation of these essential reagents.

Acknowledgments

K.B is supported by the Simons Foundation SFARI Award. E.M.G. was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship NSF 1144247. C.S.C. was supported by the NCI P41CA196276. C.S.C. and Y.C. were supported by the NIH P01GM111126. Y.C. is an Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kohler G & Milstein C Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256, 495–497 (1975). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clackson T, Hoogenboom HR, Griffiths AD & Winter G Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries. Nature 352, 624–628 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marks JD et al. By-passing immunization. Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage. J. Mol. Biol 222, 581–597 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Debs BE, Utharala R, Balyasnikova IV, Griffiths AD & Merten CA Functional single-cell hybridoma screening using droplet-based microfluidics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 109, 11570–11575 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Suter L, Bruggen J & Sorg C Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) for screening of hybridoma antibodies against cell surface antigens. J Immunol Methods 39, 407–411 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Berek C, Griffiths GM & Milstein C Molecular events during maturation of the immune response to oxazolone. Nature 316, 412–418 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adamczyk M, Gebler JC & Wu J Papain digestion of different mouse IgG subclasses as studied by electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Immunol. Methods 237, 95–104 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Colwill K et al. A roadmap to generate renewable protein binders to the human proteome. Nat. Methods 8, 551–561 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hoogenboom HR et al. Antibody phage display technology and its applications. Immunotechnology 4, 1–20 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chao G et al. Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display. Nat. Protoc 1, 755–768 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pansri P, Jaruseranee N, Rangnoi K, Kristensen P & Yamabhai M A compact phage display human scFv library for selection of antibodies to a wide variety of antigens. BMC Biotechnol. 9, 1–16 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fellouse FA et al. High-throughput Generation of Synthetic Antibodies from Highly Functional Minimalist Phage-displayed Libraries. J. Mol. Biol 373, 924–940 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haard HJ De et al. A Large Non-immunized Human Fab Fragment Phage Library That Permits Rapid Isolation and Kinetic Analysis of High Affinity Antibodies. J. Biol. Chem 274, 18218–18230 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McMahon C et al. Yeast surface display platform for rapid discovery of conformationally selective nanobodies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 25, 289–296 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** The authors generate a synthetic Nb-yeast display library and apply it for FACS-based selection to obtain GPCR active-state stabilizing Nbs.
  • 15.Bowley DR, Labrijn AF, Zwick MB & Burton DR Antigen selection from an HIV-1 immune antibody library displayed on yeast yields many novel antibodies compared to selection from the same library displayed on phage. Protein Eng. Des. Set 20, 81–90 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jones ML et al. Targeting membrane proteins for antibody discovery using phage display. Sci. Rep 6, 26240 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun J, Pons J & Craik CS Potent and selective inhibition of membrane-type serine protease 1 by human single-chain antibodies. Biochemistry 42, 892–900 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hornsby M et al. A High Through-put Platform for Recombinant Antibodies to Folded Proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2833–2847 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Simmons LC et al. Expression of full-length immunoglobulins in Escherichia coli: Rapid and efficient production of aglycosylated antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 263, 133–147 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hawkins RE, Russell SJ & Winter G Selection of phage antibodies by binding affinity. Mimicking affinity maturation. J. Mol. Biol 226, 889–896 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marks JD et al. By-passing immunization: building high affinity human antibodies by chain shuffling. Biotechnology. (TV. Y). 10, 779–783 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chaparro-Riggers J et al. Increasing serum half-life and extending cholesterol lowering in vivo by engineering antibody with pH-sensitive binding to PCSK9. J. Biol. Chem 287, 11090–11097 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mould DR & Meibohm B Drug Development of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies. BioDrugs 30, 275–293 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Redman JM, Hill EM, AIDeghaither D & Weiner LM Mechanisms of action of therapeutic antibodies for cancer. Mol. Immunol 67, 28–45 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin DY et al. The PD-1/PD-L1 complex resembles the antigen-binding Fv domains of antibodies and T cell receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 105, 3011–3016 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Balar AV & Weber JS PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies in cancer: current status and future directions. Cancer Immunol. Immunother 66, 551–564 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moroz A et al. A Preclinical Assessment of (89)Zr-atezolizumab Identifies a Requirement for Carrier Added Formulations Not Observed with (89)Zr-C4. Bioconjug. Chem 29, 3476–3482 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.LeBeau AM et al. Imaging a functional tumorigenic biomarker in the transformed epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110, 93–98 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ghosh E et al. A synthetic intrabody-based selective and generic inhibitor of GPCR endocytosis. Nat. Nanotechnol 12, 1190–1198 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Binning JM et al. Fab-based inhibitors reveal ubiquitin independent functions for HIV Vif neutralization of APOBEC3 restriction factors. PLoS Pathog. 14, el006830 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** Using scFvs that are derived from Fabs, the authors were able to probe intracellular molecular pathways of Vif and APOBEC3 immune proteins in vivo.
  • 31.Pollock SB et al. Highly multiplexed and quantitative cell-surface protein profiling using genetically barcoded antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 115, 2836–2841 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * An innovative application of recombinant Fab-phage display for cell profiling.
  • 32.Carpenter EP, Beis K, Cameron AD & Iwata S Overcoming the challenges of membrane protein crystallography. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol 18, 581–586 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Christian Ostermeier, So Iwata, Bernd M. H. Ludwig, Fv fragment-mediated crystallization of the membrane protein bacterial cytochrome c oxidase. Nature 2, 983–989 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou Y, Morais-Cabral JH, Kaufman A & MacKinnon R Chemistry of ion coordination and hydration revealed by a K+ channel-Fab complex at 2.0 A resolution. Nature 414, 43–48 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rasmussen SG et al. Crystal structure of the human (β2 adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 450, 383–387 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rasmussen SGF et al. Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the (β2adrenoceptor. Nature 469, 175–181 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li X et al. Structure-Function Analysis of the Extended Conformation of a Polyketide Synthase Module. J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 6518–6521 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * An innovative application of recombinant Fab-phage display for cell profiling. *A module of polyketide synthase 6-deoxyethronolide B synthase was Fab-stabilized and crystalized in an extended conformation without disrupting enzyme activity. In addition, the Fab provided crystallographic contacts that facilitated high-resolution structure determination.
  • 38.Schneider EL et al. A reverse binding motif that contributes to specific protease inhibition by antibodies. J. Mol. Biol 415, 699–715 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farady CJ, Egea PF, Schneider EL, Darragh MR & Craik CS Structure of an Fab-Protease Complex Reveals a Highly Specific Non-canonical Mechanism of Inhibition. J. Mol. Biol 380, 351–360 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bailey LJ et al. Locking the Elbow: Improved Antibody Fab Fragments as Chaperones for Structure Determination. J. Mol. Biol 430, 337–347 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * The authors take advantage of the ability to engineer scaffolds for recombinant antibodies specifically tailored for structural biology with decreased flexibility between the variable and constant domains.
  • 41.Cheng Y Single-particle Cryo-EM at crystallographic resolution. Cell 161, 450–457 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bartesaghi A et al. Atomic Resolution Cryo-EM Structure of β-Galactosidase. Structure 26, 848–856.e3 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Faulk WP & Taylor GM An immunocolloid method for the electron microscope. Immunochemistry 8, 1081–1083 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wu S et al. Fabs enable single particle cryoEM studies of small proteins. Structure 20, 582–592 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kintzer AF et al. The structural basis for activation of voltage sensor domains in an ion channel TPC1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, E9095–E9104 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Butterwick JA et al. Cryo-EM structure of the insect olfactory receptor Oreo. Nature 560, 447–452 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Coscia F et al. Fusion to a homo-oligomeric scaffold allows cryo-EM analysis of a small protein. Sci. Rep 6, 1–11 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liang YL et al. Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonistbound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex. Nature 555, 121–125 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liang YL et al. Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR-G-protein complex. Nature 546, 118–123 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** The structure of the calcitonin receptor bound to a heterotrimeric G-protein represents the first high-resolution structure of a GPCR using cryoEM. The authors used a Nb to stabilize the G-protein complex in order to trap a functionally relevant state and to increase the molecular weight of the sample.
  • 50.Zhang Y et al. Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. Nature 546, 248–253 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kang Y et al. Cryo-EM structure of human rhodopsin bound to an inhibitory G protein. Nature 558, 553–558 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cormier A et al. Cryo-EM structure of the αvβ8 integrin reveals a mechanism for stabilizing integrin extension. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 25, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Taylor NMI et al. Structure of the human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nature 546, 504–509 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dang S et al. Cryo-EM structures of the TMEM16A calcium activated chloride channel. Nature 552, 426–429 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; ** The authors show that combining data from datasets collected with and without Fabs can overcome a severe preferred orientation resulting in a high-resolution structure that defined key functional residues of TMEM16A, a calcium-activated chloride channel.
  • 55.Kim J et al. Subnanometre-resolution electron cryomicroscopy structure of a heterodimeric ABC exporter. Nature 517, 396–400 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lü W, Du J, Goehring A & Gouaux E Cryo-EM structures of the triheteromeric NMDA receptor and its allosteric modulation. Science. 355, 1–9 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhu S et al. Structure of a human synaptic GABAA receptor. Nature 559, 67–72 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; * Using Fabs the authors could break the pseudosymmetry of the heteromeric GABAA receptor and achieve near-atomic resolution.
  • 58.Liu Y, Gonen S, Gonen T & Yeates TO Near-atomic cryo-EM imaging of a small protein displayed on a designed scaffolding system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 115, 3362–3367 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rosenthal PB & Henderson R Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol 333, 721–745 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES