Skip to main content
The Neuroradiology Journal logoLink to The Neuroradiology Journal
. 2019 May 16;32(5):335–343. doi: 10.1177/1971400919849819

Brain and spine melanotic schwannoma: A rare occurrence and diagnostic dilemma

Ali Alamer 1,2,, Donatella Tampieri 1
PMCID: PMC6728700  PMID: 31094649

Abstract

Purpose

Melanotic schwannoma (MS) was formerly known as a rare variant of schwannoma. The behavior of MS is unpredictable, with a tendency for recurrence and metastasis. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the imaging characteristics of these rare and misdiagnosed tumors. The prognosis of MS is discussed, along with the importance of follow-up exams to assess for recurrence and metastasis. Furthermore, we compare our results with those previously published on MS in order to have a better understanding of this rare entity.

Methods

Three MS cases were encountered between 2008 and 2015 at our institute. All available data were reviewed, including the clinical history, imaging findings, operative notes, and the histopathology results. A follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was also reviewed up to 23 months post surgery to assess for recurrence.

Results

Three cases of MS are included: one in the brain and two in the spine. The brain lesion was in the occipital region. The spine lesions were thoracic intramedullary and sacral intradural. All cases were hypointense on T2-weighted imaging. Gross total resection was achieved for all lesions without adjuvant therapy. To date, the brain lesion recurred 15 months after surgery.

Conclusions

MS is a rare and distinct entity rather than a variant of schwannoma, and it poses both diagnostic and management dilemmas. Although MS has characteristic MRI features, including T1 and T2 shortening, the preoperative diagnosis is always challenging. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for management planning, including long-term follow-up exams to assess for recurrence and metastasis.

Keywords: Melanotic, schwannoma, MRI

Introduction

Melanotic schwannoma (MS), formerly known as a rare variant of schwannoma, is composed of cells having the ultrastructure and immunophenotype of Schwann cells but containing melanosomes in varying stages of maturation.1 Several theories for the etiology and histogensis of MS have been proposed, including that Schwann cells and melanocytes are neuroectodermal in origin and that melanocytes migrate with the Schwann cells.2 Killeen et al.3 found that MS cells are capable of melanogenesis. Mandybur4 suggested a melanomatous transformation of neoplastic Schwann cells.

MS was first described at the thoracic sympathetic ganglion by Millar in 1932.5 Currently, up to 200 cases of MS have been reported in the literature at various locations, including the skin, bone, visceral organs, sinuses, adrenal glands, uterus, bronchus, pancreas, orbit, intracranial, and intramedullary.6 The lesions most frequently arise close to the midline in the paravertebral nerve roots.6 Patients can have various presentations based on tumor location. In 1990, Carney7 noted the frequent (about 50%) association of MS with other stigmata of Carney complex, which consists of myxomas (of the heart, breast, and skin), spotty pigmentation, and endocrinopathy (Cushing syndrome, precocious puberty, and acromegaly). The behavior of MS is unpredictable, and although it is considered benign, it can have malignant clinical potential with a tendency for recurrence and metastasis. The rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis have been reported to be 6–35% and 8–41%, respectively, including patients with histologically benign-appearing tumors.69

The purpose of this study was to illustrate the imaging characteristics of these rare and misdiagnosed tumors, which should be considered in the differential diagnosis of uncommon intradural masses. The prognosis of MS is also discussed compared to conventional schwannoma, with the importance of follow-up exams to assess for possible recurrence and metastasis. Furthermore, we compare our results with those previously published for MS in order to have a better understanding of this rare entity.

Methods

Three cases of MS, one intracranial and two intra-spinal, were encountered between 2008 and 2015 at our institute upon review of the radiology database. All available data for the three cases previously described as “MS” were retrieved and reviewed by the authors (A.A. and D.T.), including the clinical history, imaging findings, operative notes, and histopathology results to date. All three patients were women, ranging in age from 40 to 54 years. The brain lesion presented with a headache and visual deficit. The spinal cases presented with back pain without radicular or sphincteric symptoms. In one of the spinal cases, the patient was also known to have breast carcinoma, which made the preoperative diagnosis even more challenging.

Patients were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T. The MRI brain protocol included: sagittal T1 spin echo, axial FRFSE T2, axial FSE PD, and diffuse-weighted imaging. The MRI spine protocol included: sagittal T1 TSE, sagittal T2 TSE, and axial T2 TSE. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) was also obtained after intravenous injection of 1 cc/10 kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering, Berlin, Germany). MRI scans of the lesions were evaluated, with an emphasis on the location, shape, margin, signal intensity, and pattern of contrast enhancement.

All lesions were removed by open surgery with gross total resection. The final diagnoses were established by histopathology, with diffuse positivity of S-100 in all patients. Based on the final diagnosis, follow-up exams by MRI were also reviewed between 15 months after surgery in one patient and 23 months in other patient to assess for recurrence. A detailed review of the literature was also conducted through PubMed using “melanotic schwannoma” as the search term.

Results

Three cases of MS are included: one in the brain and two in the spine (thoracic and sacral). All cases were solitary lesions. The brain lesion was dural based in the right occipital region (Figure 1). The thoracic spine lesion was intramedullary at the T5–T6 level (Figure 2), and the other spinal case was a sacral intradural lesion (Figure 3). T1WI showed isointensity in the brain lesion and in the intramedullary thoracic lesion. However, the sacral lesion was hypointense, with a peripheral rim of spontaneous T1 hyperintensity. All cases were hypointense on T2WI and showed intense contrast enhancement. The intracranial lesion showed peripheral cystic changes with enhancing wall (Figure 1). All tumors showed well-defined, round, or ovoid masses. The microscopic findings showed spindle or epithelioid cells tumor proliferation with brown pigment depositions. There was a lack of cellular atypia or significant mitotic activity. All cases were positive for S-100, Melan-A, and HMB-45, apart from one lesion that was negative for HMB-45.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A 40-year-old female presented with a history of headache and visual deficit. A dural-based mass was identified in the right occipital region with iso-density on computed tomography, iso-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and low signal intensity on T2WI compared to the cerebral cortex associated with diffusion restriction, intense contrast enhancement, and cystic changes (arrow).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A 45-year-old female presented with a history of back pain. A rounded intramedullary thoracic spine lesion was identified at the T5–T6 level with iso-signal intensity on T1WI and low signal intensity on T2WI associated with intense contrast enhancement (arrow) and adjacent large edema.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A 54-year-old female presented with a history of back pain. An oval intraspinal sacral lesion was identified at the S2–S3 level with predominantly central low signal intensity on both T1WI and T2WI associated with intense contrast enhancement. There was peripheral rim of spontaneous T1 hyperintense signal (arrow).

To date, the brain lesion recurred 15 months after surgery (Figure 4). However, the intramedullary thoracic lesion and the sacral lesion have shown no evidence of recurrence in the last follow-up exams after 23 and 15 months from the date of surgery, respectively (Figures 5 and 6). None of our cases received radiotherapy, although one case refused to continue treatment with radiotherapy. None of the patients had documented skin or other pigmented lesions. There was no evidence of metastasis in any of the three cases.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) Immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows resection of the occipital lesion without residual. (b) A 15-month postoperative MRI shows a new lesion in the operative site with low signal on T2WI (arrow) and contrast enhancement associated with cystic changes.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A 23-month follow-up MRI post gross total resection of the intramedullary thoracic spine lesion shows no evidence of tumor residual or recurrence.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A 15-month follow-up MRI post gross total resection of the sacral lesion shows no evidence of tumor residual or recurrence.

Discussion

The 2016 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors reclassified MS as a distinct entity rather than a variant of schwannoma due to its clinical behavior and genetic difference.10 Two forms of MS were microscopically described: sporadic and psammomatous.9 The psammomatous form is so called due to the fact that some contain psammoma calcifications, and it is often associated with Carney complex in about 50% of cases.7 Isolated cases of non-psammomatous MS have been associated with Carney complex as well.11 MS occur in relatively younger adults (Mage = 35 years), and have no sex predilection compared to usual schwannoma, which occur frequently in the fifth decade (Mage = 48 years) with a slight female predilection.6,9 However, psammomatous MS occurs a decade younger than the sporadic MS.7

The clinical presentation is nonspecific based on tumor location and growth rate.9 The lesions are most frequently extramedullary in location, arising from the posterior spinal roots.6,8 Intracranial and intramedullary MS are extremely rare, with only 22 and 11 cases published in the literature to date, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). The average age of the total 35 patients (one patient excluded due to the lack of clinical data and two patients added from our project) was 42.6 years (range 11–77 years), with a slight female predilection (53%). The majority of the intracranial cases were in Meckel’s cave and the cerebellopontine angle region (70%). The most common location of the intramedullary MS was the thoracic spine (67%). Hoover et al.12 collected some reported and presumed etiologies of intramedullary lesions, including intramedullary nerve fibers displacing Schwann cells during embryogenesis, neoplastic extension of Schwann cells through the insertion site of the dorsal root, neoplastic differentiation of neuroectodermal cells in the pia to form intramedullary MS, and disordered migration of neural crest cells during neural tube closure.

Table 1.

Previously reported intracranial MS cases in the literature including one of our cases.

Author/year Age Sex Location CT T1 signal T2 signal Cystic Treatment Recurrence
Dastur et al.17 1967 38 M CPA NA NA NA NA STR, no AT Recurrence at 8 months
Quencer et al.23 1979 22 F Meckel’s cave into CPA Hyperdense NA NA GTR, no AT No recurrence at 14 months
Miller et al.24 1986 74 M CPA NA NA NA NA GTR, no AT NA
Beck et al.19 1987 12 M Meckel’s cave into CPA NA NA NA NA GTR, no AT Recurrence at 24 months (treated by radiotherapy)
Rowlands et al.25 1987 27 M Cavernous sinus/Meckel’s cave into CPA NA NA NA NA Biopsy, + radiotherapy Detected 10 weeks post resection of MS in the bronchus and recurred at 14 months
Carney7 1990 NA NA Trigeminal nerve NA NA NA NA NA NA
Earls et al.26 1994 77 M CPA Hyperdense Isointense Isointense + NA, no AT NA
Ranjan et al.27 1995 65 F Cerebellum Hyperdense NA NA GTR, no AT No recurrence at 6 months
Buhl et al.28 2004 28 M Meckel’s cave NA NA NA GTR, no AT Detected 2.5 years from resection of spinal MS
Zhang et al.9 2005 11 M CN III NA NA NA NA STR, + radiotherapy No recurrence at 3.5 years
Carrasco et al.11 2006 34 F Meckel’s cave NA Hyperintesne NA STR, no AT Recurrence at 4 months
Er et al.29 2007 54 M Foramen magnum NA NA Hypointense GTR, no AT No recurrence at 24 months
Saint-Blancard et al.30 2008 51 F CPA NA NA Hypointense + STR, no AT NA
Scheithauer et al.31 2009 41 M Posterior fossa NA NA NA NA NA, + radiotherapy NA
Ditz et al.22 2011 12 F Orbit and cavernous sinus Hyperdense NA NA STR, no AT Recurrence at 20 years
Nenashev et al.32 2012 27 F Meckel’s cave NA NA NA NA STR, + radiotherapy No recurrence at 6 months
Torres-Mora et al.6 2014 19 F Meckel’s cave NA NA NA NA NA No recurrence at 49 months
Torres-Mora et al.6 2014 42 M Cerebellum NA NA NA NA NA NA
Spina et al.33 2015 47 F CPA NA NA Hypointense NA STR, + radiotherapy NA
Mahato et al.15 2018 43 F CPA Hyperdense NA Hypointense + STR, + radiotherapy NA
Collart et al.18 2018 64 F Meckel’s cave NA Hyperintesne Hypointense + GTR, no AT Recurrence at 3 months
Moisak et al.20 2018 23 M Meckel’s cave NA Hyperintense Hyperintense GTR, + chemotherapy No recurrence at 3.5 years
Added case 40 F Occipital Isodense isointense Hypointense + GTR, no AT Recurrence at 15 months

MS: melanotic schwannoma; NA: not available; M: male; F: female; CPA: cerebellopontine angle; CN: cranial nerve; +: present; − : absent; GTR: gross total resection; STR: subtotal resection; AT: adjuvant therapy.

Table 2.

Previously reported intramedullary MS cases in the literature, including one of our cases.

Author/year Age Sex Location T1 T2 Cystic Treatment Follow-up
Solomon et al.34 1987 69 M Medulla–C3 NA NA NA GTR, no AT NA
Marchese et al.35 1990 72 F C4–C6 Hyperintense NA NA STR, no AT NA
Sola-Perez et al.36 1994 63 F C7–T1 NA NA NA FNA, no AT NA
Acciarri et al.37 1999 44 F T2–T3 Isointense Hypointense GTR, no AT No recurrence at 4 months
Santaguida et al.21 2004 35 M C4–C5 NA NA GTR, no AT Recurrence at 10 months (treated by radiotherapy)
Mouchaty et al.38 2008 56 F T12–L1 NA NA GTR, no AT No recurrence at 12 months
Hoover et al.12 2012 62 F T11 Hyperintense Hypointense GTR, no AT No recurrence at 10 months
Pan et al.14 2014 23 F T4–T5 Hyperintense Hypointense GTR, no AT No recurrence at 3 years
Mohamed et al.39 2014 43 M T9–T10 Hyperintense Hypointense GTR, no AT No recurrence at 6 months
Cheng et al.40 2017 47 M T4–T5 NA Hypointense + STR, no AT Recurrence at 6 years
Hu et al.41 2018 40 M C1–C2 Hyperintense Hypointense STR, no AT No recurrence at 2 months
Added case 45 F T5–T6 Isointense Hypointense GTR, no AT No recurrence at 23 months

FNA: fine-needle aspiration.

MS is often misdiagnosed as melanoma or conventional schwannoma. The differentiation between MS and other pigmented lesions can be difficult radiologically and pathologically, requiring extensive histopathological and immunohistochemical workup. The preoperative diagnosis is based on MRI, which is the investigation of choice. The radiological diagnosis is very challenging, and cases are usually misdiagnosed as either primary tumor or metastasis such as melanoma. Extramedullary lesions are commonly misdiagnosed as meningioma, conventional schwannoma, or even dermoid. The reason for this is the signal variability of the lesion on MRI due to the distribution and contents of melanin within the tumor and the presence or absence of associated hemorrhage. MS usually exhibits hyperintensity on T1WI and hypointensity on T2WI due to the paramagnetic effect of melanin. However, only lesions comprised of >10% melanin-containing cells exhibit hyperintensity on T1WI and hypointensity on T2WI.13 A review of the available imaging data of the intracranial and intramedullary cases showed hyperintensity on T1WI and hypointensity on T2WI in 67% and 87% cases, respectively. The blood components of the lesion are also variable, depending on the hemorrhage stage, which makes the diagnosis more challenging, and it may be confused with other much more common hemorrhagic lesions such as cavernoma.14 Contrast enhancement after gadolinium administration may be homogenous or heterogeneous based on tumor cellularity, hemorrhage, and cystic changes. Administration of gadolinium can shows nodular enhancement when cystic components are present, but it is mainly useful in differentiating intramedullary lesions from spinal-cord edema. The available data from the reviewed cases demonstrated 33% intralesional cystic changes probably due to an old hemorrhage. Mahato et al.15 questioned the relationship between cystic changes/necrosis and invasive growth of MS that increases the likelihood of subtotal resection. Confident diagnosis of intramedullary schwannoma can also be made preoperatively when there is continuity of the intramedullary lesion with a contrast-enhanced thickened spinal root.16 On computed tomography, MS manifests as an iso- or hyperattenuating lesion (100%), which may have areas of calcifications. Underlying bone remodeling and erosion are also observed.17,18

Surgical resection with tumor-free margins is the treatment of choice for MS if feasible.9 The intracranial and intramedullary MS cases underwent gross total resection in 50% and 67% of cases, respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy remains controversial, with no published clinical series on the effectiveness of radiotherapy or treatment protocol. Vallat-Decouvelaere et al.8 and Zhang et al.9 observed a lower rate of recurrence and metastasis in patients with MS treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. According to these authors, radiotherapy should be considered in case of histologic criteria of malignancy, incomplete surgical resection, tumor recurrence, or metastasis. Patients with intracranial MS received radiotherapy in 35% of cases either after the initial surgery or as treatment of recurrent disease.19 One patient received a course of temozolomide chemotherapy.20 None of the intramedullary spinal cases received adjuvant treatment, apart from one patient21 who received radiotherapy only after tumor recurrence. Following surgery, the diagnosis of MS relies upon histopathology. The most characteristic features of MS are more or less melanin granules found in Schwann cells. This feature raises a diagnostic problem of whether this is a nerve sheath tumor or a melanoma. Immunohistochemical studies can aid the diagnosis, with strong expression of S-100 in addition to typical dumbbell-shaped growth along the nerve roots grossly and the presence of psammomatous bodies microscopically.9 MS stain variably with HMB-45 and Melan-A, as these antibodies are valuable for the diagnosis of malignant melanomas.9

The prognosis of MS is really unpredictable. Although it is considered to be benign, malignant clinical behavior has been documented, along with a tendency for recurrence and metastasis. The prognosis can be much worse in case of Carney’s complex with multiple other associated tumors. In Carney’s7 series of 31 patients, 6% had local recurrence and 10% died of metastatic disease. This was followed by Vallat-Decouvelaere et al.,8 who noted overall local recurrence and metastasis rates of 15% and 26%, respectively. A series of 13 patients reported by Zhang et al. in 20059 showed recurrence in 18.2% and metastasis in 9.1% of cases. Finally, in one of the largest and latest series of MS in the literature, Torres-Mora et al.6 reported local recurrence and distant metastatic rates of 35% and 42%, respectively. The results of the present study extend upon these earlier observations, with 39% of the intracranial and intramedullary MS cases having local recurrence between 3 months and 20 years (56% underwent incomplete resection and 89% not received adjuvant therapy). The difference in rate may be explained by the number of patients and longer follow-up exams. Based on the above-described results, Zhang et al.9 suggested MS to be a unique neoplasm with potential malignancy. Torres-Mora et al.6 suggested reclassification of MS from benign to malignant. The histological criteria for malignancy in MS are not clearly defined, and there is no reliable histological indicator of malignant clinical behavior apart from elevated mitotic activity that may predict malignancy.6 Thus, appropriate long-term follow-up is required for all cases, as MS may recur or metastasize, even after two decades of absence of overt malignant histological features.22

Conclusions

MS is a rare and distinct entity rather than a variant of schwannoma, which poses both diagnostic and management dilemmas. Although MS has characteristic MRI features, including T1 and T2 shortening, the preoperative diagnosis is always challenging due to the rarity of this lesion. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for management planning, including long-term follow-up exams due to the unpredictable prognosis and tendency for recurrence and metastasis.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114: 97–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bird CC, Willis RA. The histogenesis of pigmented neurofibromas. J Pathol 1969; 97: 631–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Killeen RM, Davy CL, Bauserman SC. Melanocytic schwannoma. Cancer 1988; 62: 174–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mandybur TI. Melanotic nerve sheath tumors. J Neurosurg 1974; 41: 187–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Millar WG. A malignant melanotic tumor of ganglion cells arising from thoracic sympathetic ganglion. J Pathol Bacteriol 1932; 35: 351–357. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Torres-Mora J, Dry S, Li X, et al. Malignant melanotic schwannian tumor: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and gene expression profiling study of 40 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of “melanotic schwannoma.”. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38: 94–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carney JA. Psammomatous melanotic schwannoma: a distinctive, heritable tumor with special associations, including cardiac myxoma and the Cushing syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 1990; 14: 206–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vallat-Decouvelaere AV, Wassef M, Lot G, et al. Spinal melanotic schwannoma: a tumour with poor prognosis. Histopathology 1999; 35: 558–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang H, Yang G, Chen H, et al. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of 13 cases of melanotic schwannoma. Chin Med J (Engl) 2005; 118: 1451–1461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131: 803–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carrasco CA, Rojas-Salazar D, Chiorino R, et al. Melanotic nonpsammomatous trigeminal schwannoma as the first manifestation of Carney complex: case report. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 1334–1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoover JM, Kumar R, Bledsoe JM, et al. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma. Rare Tumors 2012; 4: 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Isiklar I, Leeds NE, Fuller GN, et al. Intracranial metastatic melanoma: correlation between MR imaging characteristics and melanin content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1503–1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pan S-Y, Cheng Y-C, Kao T-H. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 16: 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mahato D, Vivas-Buitrago T, Gassie K, et al. Intracranial melanotic schwannomas: a rare variant with unusual adherent features. J Neurooncol 2018; 136: 299–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Colosimo C, Cerase A, Denaro L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intramedullary spinal cord schwannomas. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 114–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dastur DK, Sinh G, Pandya SK. Melanotic tumor of the acoustic nerve. J Neurosurg 1967; 27: 166–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Collart J, Vandeponseele M, Bosschaert P. Intracranial melanotic schwannomas: rare and distinctive tumors to know due to their risk of recurrence and metastases. J Belgian Soc Radiol 2018; 102: 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Beck DW, Menezes AH. Lesions in Meckel’s cave: variable presentation and pathology. J Neurosurg 1987; 67: 684–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moisak GI, Matsko DE, Chernov SV, et al. What tactics should a surgeon choose to treat a black extracerebral tumor? A case report of psammomatous melanotic schwannoma of the Meckel cave and literature review. World Neurosurg 2018; 116: 337–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Santaguida C, Sabbagh AJ, Guiot MC, et al. Aggressive intramedullary melanotic schwannoma: case report. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ditz C, Brunswig K, Meyer C, et al. Intracranial melanotic schwannoma: a case report of recurrence with extra- and intradural manifestation two decades after initial diagnosis and treatment. Cent Eur Neurosurg 2011; 72: 211–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Quencer RM, Stokes NA, Wolfe D, et al. Melanotic nerve sheath tumor of the Gasserian ganglion and trigeminal nerve. Am J Roentgenol 1979; 133: 142–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller RT, Sarikaya H, Sos A. Melanotic schwannoma of the acoustic nerve. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 153–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rowlands D, Edwards C, Collins F. Malignant melanotic schwannoma of the bronchus. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40: 1449–1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Earls JP, Robles HA, McAdams HP, et al. General case of the day. Malignant melanotic schwannoma of the eighth cranial nerve. Radiographics 1994; 14: 1425–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ranjan A, Chacko G, Chandi SM. Intracerebellar melanotic schwannoma: a case report. Br J Neurosurg 1995; 9: 687–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Buhl R, Barth H, Hugo HH, et al. Intracranial and spinal melanotic schwannoma in the same patient. J Neurooncol 2004; 68: 249–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Er U, Kazanci A, Eyriparmak T, et al. Melanotic schwannoma. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14: 676–678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Saint-Blancard P, Goasguen O, Kossowski M, et al. [A rare primary tumor of the cerebellopontine angle: melanotic schwannoma, a pigmented tumor with unpredictable prognosis]. Rev Med Interne 2008; 29: 587–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Scheithauer BW, Erdogan S, Rodriguez FJ, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of cranial nerves and intracranial contents: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2009; 33: 325–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nenashev EA, Rotin DA, Stepanian MA, et al. [Differential diagnosis between melanotic schwannoma of gasserian ganglion and metastatic melanoma of middle cranial fossa]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 2012; 76: 58–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spina A, Gagliardi F, Boari N, et al. Intracranial melanotic schwannomas. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2015; 76: 399–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Solomon RA, Handler MS, Sedelli RV, et al. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma of the cervicomedullary junction. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 36–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Marchese MJ, McDonald JV. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma of the cervical spinal cord: report of a case. Surg Neurol 1990; 33: 353–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sola-Perez J, Perez-Guillermo M, Bas-Bernal A, et al. Melanocytic schwannoma: the cytologic aspect in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): report of a case located in the spinal cord. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11: 291–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Acciarri N, Padovani R, Riccioni L. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma. Report of a case and review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 1999; 13: 322–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mouchaty H, Conti R, Buccoliero AM, et al. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma of the conus medullaris: a case report. Spinal Cord 2008; 46: 703–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mohamed M, Panos S, Baborie A, et al. Atypical benign melanotic thoracic intradural schwannoma. Br J Neurosurg 2014; 28: 411–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cheng X, Liu J, Le J, et al. Invasive intramedullary melanotic schwannoma: case report and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 303–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hu L, Wang C. Intramedullary melanotic schwannoma of the cervical spine: a case report and literature review. Mol Clin Oncol 2018, pp. 567–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Neuroradiology Journal are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES