Abstract
Purpose
Based on prior reports demonstrating that neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitors increase sperm motility, the goal of our studies was to identify endogenous seminal peptides that inhibit NEP and investigate their potential effect on sperm motility.
Methods
Peptidomic analysis was performed on human seminal fluid, identifying 22 novel peptides. One peptide, named RSIY-11, derived from semenogelin-1, was predicted through sequence analysis to be a substrate and/or potential inhibitor of NEP. Enzymatic analysis was conducted to determine the inhibitory constant (Ki) of RSIY-11 as an inhibitor of NEP. Total and progressive sperm motility was determined at baseline and 30 and 60 min following addition of RSIY-11 to seminal fluid in 59 patients undergoing an infertility workup at an urban medical center. Additionally, the effects of RSIY-11 on sperm motility were evaluated in 15 of the 59 patients that met criteria for asthenospermia.
Results
RSIY-11 was shown to act as a competitive inhibitor of NEP with a Ki of 18.4 ± 1.6 μM. Addition of RSIY-11 at concentrations of 0.75 μM, 7.5 μM, and 75 μM significantly increased sperm motility at all time points investigated, with increases of 6.1%, 6.9%, and 9.2% at 60 min, respectively. Additionally, within the subgroup of patients with asthenospermia, RSIY-11 at concentrations of 0.75 μM, 7.5 μM, and 75 μM significantly increased sperm motility at all time points investigated, with increases of 7.6%, 8.8%, and 10.6% at 60 min, respectively.
Conclusions
RSIY-11 is a newly identified semenogelin-1-derived peptide present in seminal fluid. RSIY-11 acts as a potent competitive inhibitor of NEP, which when added to seminal fluid significantly increases sperm motility. RSIY-11 could play a potential role in the treatment for male factor infertility related to asthenospermia and improve intrauterine insemination outcomes.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s10815-019-01524-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Semenogelin, Asthenospermia, Sperm motility, Neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, RSIY-11
Introduction
Infertility affects approximately 1 in 8 couples, with male factor infertility increasingly recognized as a significant contributing factor to the overall incidence rate of infertility. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control reported that male factor infertility was the leading single diagnosis for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, accounting for 32% of cases [1]. Although male factor infertility is multi-factorial, sperm motility is one of the most significant factors in predicting male fertility [2–4]. After ejaculation, semen forms a semisolid coagulum that entraps immotile spermatozoa [5]. Sperm motility is initiated upon the proteolytic cleavage of the coagulum and the release of sperm into the female reproductive tract where it develops progressive motility and hyperactive motility upon reaching the oviduct and oocyte [6]. Asthenospermia, reduced sperm motility, is defined by the World Health Organization as < 40% motile sperm or < 32% of sperm with progressive motility [7].
Numerous proteins and peptides are present in seminal fluid [8, 9], and several peptides such as enkephalins and tachykinins [10–12] are implicated in maintaining sperm motility. The major seminal fluid protein is semenogelin-1, which forms the coagulum. A well-characterized breakdown product of semenogelin-1 is seminal plasma motility inhibitor (SPMI), which, as its name suggests, functions as an inhibitor of sperm motility [5, 13, 14]. Cleavage of semenogelin-1 into peptides is primarily mediated by prostate-specific antigen (PSA, also known as kallikrein 3); this enzyme is also able to degrade SPMI [15]. Although the prevailing view is that the primary biological function of semenogelin-1 and semenogelin-derived peptides is to inhibit sperm motility, it was proposed ~ 30 years ago that semenogelin-1 is processed into a “motility-activating peptide” [16]. However, this peptide has not previously been identified.
The activity of peptides in mediating sperm motility is likely regulated through the action of peptidases, in particularly neutral endopeptidase (NEP), which determines the stability and duration by which peptide signaling molecules act on receptors located on the sperm membrane surface. NEP is detectable in the seminal plasma, where its activity is primarily localized to prostasomes and sperm cells [11]. Previous reports have demonstrated inhibition of NEP by synthetic inhibitors, such as thiorphan or phosphoramidon, results in improved sperm motility [10, 12]. Opiorphin, an endogenous peptide which acts as a potent NEP inhibitor, is found in human seminal fluid, and we have previously reported that supplementation of opiorphin to seminal fluid has a positive effect on sperm motility [17–19].
Recognizing the potential role that endogenous peptides present in seminal fluid may have on sperm motility, we evaluated the peptidome of human semen. Unlike proteomic studies that have previously been performed on seminal fluid [8, 9], peptidomics studies focus exclusively on the endogenous peptides present in a biological sample [20, 21]. Peptidomic screening identified 22 peptides in seminal fluid that were derived from semenogelin-1 and semenogelin-2. We performed a detailed evaluation of a novel peptide that we named RSIY-11. Amino acid sequence analysis predicted RSIY-11 acts as a substrate and/or competitive inhibitor of NEP. In the current report, we demonstrated that RSIY-11 is an NEP inhibitor and a positive regulator of sperm motility.
Materials and methods
All studies involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
Peptidomic analysis of seminal plasma
Semen from two donors, both with normal sperm motility parameters, was analyzed separately by peptidomics analysis. Freshly collected semen was immediately centrifuged at 13 krpm for 5 min at 4 °C to remove sperm from the seminal plasma. Approximately 0.6 ml of the supernatant (seminal plasma), from 1 ml of semen, was added to 2.4 ml of cold acidified acetone (HCl/H20/acetone; 1:5:40, v/v). The samples were incubated for 10 min at − 70 °C to precipitate proteins and centrifuged at 13 krpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and dried under vacuum for approximately 4 h at ambient temperature.
To separate peptides from proteins, samples were resuspended in 1 ml of H2O and applied to centrifugal filter units with a 10-kDa molecular weight cut-off cellulose membrane (Amicon Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Unit with Ultracel-10 membrane; Millipore, Sigma, USA). Samples were centrifuged at 2300×g for 30 min, and the flow-through containing the peptides was recovered. To remove salts, the samples were loaded onto a C18 reverse phase spin column (Pierce, Thermo Fisher, USA), washed with dilute trifluoroacetic acid in water, and the peptides eluted with 70% acetonitrile. The C18 eluate was dried in a vacuum centrifuge and stored frozen until analysis on liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS).
LC-MS/MS analyses were performed on a Synapt G2 mass spectrometer coupled to a nanoAcquity capillary liquid nano-chromatography (LC) system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The peptide mixture (5 μl) was desalted online for 5 min at a flow rate of 8 μl/min of phase A (0.1% formic acid) using a Symmetry C18 trapping column (5-μm particles, 180-μm inner diameters, 20-mm length; Waters). The mixture of trapped peptides was subsequently separated by elution with a gradient of 7–65% of phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) through a BEH 130 C18 column (1.7-μm particles, 75-μm inner diameter, 200-mm length; Waters) in 60 min. The data were acquired in the data-dependent mode, and the MS spectra of multiple-charged protonated peptides generated by electrospray ionization were acquired for 0.3 s from m/z 300–1600. The three most intense ions exceeding base peak intensity threshold of 2500 counts were automatically selected and dissociated in MS/MS by 15- to 60-eV collisions with argon for 0.3 s. The typical LC and electrospray ionization conditions consisted of a flow rate of 250 nl/min, a capillary voltage of 3.0 kV, a block temperature of 70 °C, and a cone voltage of 50 V. The dynamic peak exclusion window was set to 90 s.
MS spectra were analyzed using the MassLynx 4.1 software (Waters). To identify peptides, MS/MS data were analyzed using the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science Ltd., UK) and the NCBI human database (310106 sequences). No cleavage site was specified. Modifications included N-terminal protein acetylation, methionine oxidation, and deamination of Asn/Gln (which was initially detected in the present study from de novo sequencing and then included in the Mascot search parameters). All search results were manually interpreted to eliminate false positives, as described [22, 23].
Prediction of peptides with NEP inhibitor function and synthesis of RSIY-11
Peptides identified by LC-MS were screened as potential substrates/inhibitors of NEP through use of the MEROPS database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/merops/ [24]). This screen identified a peptide VQKDVSQRSIY (referred to as RSIY-11, a peptide of 11 amino acids with a C-terminal amino acid sequence of RSIY). RSIY-11 was synthesized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA).
Enzymatic characterization
Michaelis-Menten Constant
A fluorometric assay was performed using recombinant human NEP enzyme at 0.1 μg/ml (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) and fluorogenic NEP peptide substrate ((7-methoxycoumarin-4-yl)-acetyl-R-P-P-G-F-S-A-F-K-(2, 4-dinitrophenyl)-OH, R&D Systems). In a 96-well format plate, 50 μl of NEP enzyme was added to 50 μl of 50 mM of Tris 0.05%, Brij-35 buffer (R&D Systems) and 50 μl of fluorogenic NEP peptide substrate at concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 33 μM for a total volume of 150 μl. Fluorescence was recorded at 1-min intervals for 15 min using a 96-well plate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 320 and 405 nm, respectively. The assay was run in triplicate and the Michaelis-Menten equation was used to calculate the Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) of the substrate.
Inhibitory constant and inhibitory nature of RSIY-11 and opiorphin
The inhibitory nature and inhibitory constant (Ki) of RSIY-11 were determined using the fluorometric assay described above. Fifty microliters of substrate (10 μM, 3.3 μM, 1.1 μM, or 0.37 μM) was added to 50 μl of NEP enzyme (0.1 μg/ml) followed by 50 μl of synthetic RSIY-11 or opiorphin at a range of concentrations from 2 mM to 0.31 μM. A Dixon plot was generated to obtain the Ki of RSIY-11 and opiorphin, and a Lineweaver-Burk plot was generated to evaluate the inhibitory nature of RSIY-11 (using GraphPad Prism, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Pre-incubation of RSIY-11
The level of NEP inhibition by RSIY-11 was compared between assays that included or did not include pre-incubation of NEP with RSIY-11 (8.2 μM). The fluorometric assay (as described above) was prepared with 50 μl of recombinant human NEP enzyme (0.1 μg/ml) and 50 μl of synthetic RSIY-11 followed by pre-incubation for 3 or 24 h at 37 °C prior to the addition of fluorogenic NEP peptide substrate to determine enzymatic activity. A negative control was also performed with addition of 50 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in place of RSIY-11. Following the addition of substrate, the fluorescence was recorded in 1-min intervals over a 15-min period, as described above. The assays were run in triplicate.
Semen and motility analysis
Following IRB approval, semen samples were collected from men who were seen at the Montefiore’s Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Health. Inclusion criteria were men presenting for a routine semen analysis for an infertility workup > 18 years old with at least 2 days of sexual abstinence. Exclusion criteria were men < 18 years old, azoospermia, or any known history of HIV, prostate surgery, benign prostatic hyperplasia, exogenous androgen use, untreated thyroid disease, hyperprolactinemia, marijuana or opioid use, clomiphene or human chorionic gonadotropin use within the previous 90 days, kidney failure, cirrhosis, history of gonadotoxic chemotherapy, history of testicular or prostate cancer, cystic fibrosis, abnormal karyotype, and history of cryptorchidism.
Specimens from 59 patients were collected and allowed to liquefy at 37 °C for 30 min. Ninety-nine microliters of raw semen was divided into 6 aliquots and subsequently analyzed prior to and after addition of one of the following five treatments: PBS, opiorphin (200 μM), or RSIY-11 (0.75 μM, 7.5 μM, or 75 μM). The sixth aliquot was not treated. The two peptides (opiorphin and RSIY-11) were synthetic to avoid the possibility that biological effects were due to a contaminating peptide. An aliquot (5 μl) of each of the samples was then counted in a 4-chamber Microcell disposable counting chamber slide (Vitrolife, Goteborg, Sweden). Total motility (TM) including progressive motility (PM) and non-progressive motility (NP), as well as immotile sperm (IM), was evaluated in duplicate immediately (zero time point) and at 30 and 60 min following the addition of peptides. TM, PM, NP, IM, and sperm concentration were evaluated under a phase-contrast microscope at × 200 magnification. An eyepiece with a 10 × 10 grid was used to count the sperm in all 10 chambers. Concentration was reported as million/milliliter. PM was defined as spermatozoa moving linearly or in a large circle, whereas NP was defined as movement not meeting the criteria for progressive movement. TM was calculated by PM + NP/PM + NP + IM. PM was calculated by PM/PM + NP + IM. All readings were performed in duplicate by one or two trained examiners. If there was a > 20% discrepancy between the first and second reading, a third evaluation was performed and all values were averaged.
The last 14 semen samples of the 59 evaluated were tested with a broader range of concentrations of RSIY-11 and opiorphin using the following additional concentrations: RSIY-11 diluted to 0.075 μM, 0.0075 μM, or 0.00075 μM and opiorphin diluted to 20 μM, 2 μM, or 0.2 μM. Additionally, a separate analysis on the effects of RSIY-11 and opiorphin was performed on patients that met the criteria for asthenospermia (< 40% motility or < 32% progressive motility).
Statistical analysis
We used a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model to compare TM and PM at baseline with all other experimental conditions: i.e., PBS (negative control), opiorphin at 200 μM (positive control), and RSIY-11 at 0.75 μM, 7.5 μM, and 75 μM concentrations (a similar comparison was performed for the lower test doses, data shown in Supplementary Fig. 2A–C). We also compared TM and PM for three time points 0, 30, and 60 min within each condition. A p < 0.05 (2-sided) was considered to represent a statistically significant difference compared with baseline with lower p values of < 0.01 and < 0.001 denoting more statistically significant results (represented in figures with ** and ***, respectively). We also carried out a sub-analysis to determine if RSIY-11 and opiorphin increased sperm motility in patients with asthenospermia. These data were also analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA model, with a p value < 0.05 considered to represent a statistically significant difference compared with baseline. All data analysis was carried out in Stata version 14.
Results
Identification of semen peptides and prediction of RSIY-11 as a potential NEP inhibitor
Peptidomic analysis of human seminal fluid from two healthy male donors detected over 100 peptides of which 22 were identified by MS/MS sequence analysis (Table 1). The remainder of the peptides could not be conclusively identified because there was no high-quality MS/MS data, a common occurrence with peptidomics [25]. These 22 peptides represent 18 distinct peptides, with 4 of the peptides identical in sequence to other identified peptides but with post-translational modifications that altered their masses. These modifications include deamidation of Asn, which was converted into Asp, and loss of water (18 Da) from the C-terminal region of the peptide (Table 1). All of the identified peptides were derived from two proteins, semenogelin-1 and semenogelin-2, which are known to be secreted into seminal fluid [26]. Six of the 14 distinct peptides identified from semenogelin-1 were related to each other, with three ending in –RSIY and another three ending in –SSIY (Table 1). In addition, three peptides were found that were similar to these peptides, but which lacked two C-terminal amino acids, ending in –RS (two peptides) or –SS (one peptide).
Table 1.
Peptide sequence | Observed | Theoretical | Diff | |
---|---|---|---|---|
z | Mass | Mass | (ppm) | |
Semenogelin-1 (SEMG1) | ||||
VQKDVSQRSIY | 3 | 1321.694 | 1321.699 | − 4 |
ENGVQKDVSQRS | 2 | 1345.650 | 1345.659 | − 6 |
SSSTEERRLHY | 2 | 1363.644 | 1363.648 | − 3 |
GENGVQKDVSQRS | 3 | 1402.687 | 1402.680 | 5 |
GENGVQKDVSQSSIY | 2 | 1609.728 | 1609.758 | − 19 |
GEDGVQKDVSQSSIY deamidation of Asn3 | 2 | 1610.752 | 1610.742 | 6 |
YGENGVQKDVSQSSIY | 2 | 1772.820 | 1772.822 | − 1 |
YGEDGVQKDVSQSSIY deamidation of Asn4 | 2 | 1773.815 | 1773.806 | 5 |
SQTEKLVAGKSQIQAPN | 2 | 1797.963 | 1797.958 | 2 |
PSQDQGNSPSGKGISSQY | 2 | 1835.838 | 1835.829 | 5 |
YGENGVQKDVSQRSIY | 3 | 1841.897 | 1841.891 | 3 |
YGEDGVQKDVSQRSIY deamidation of Asn4 | 3 | 1842.868 | 1842.875 | − 4 |
ITIPSQEQEHSQKANKISYQ | 4 | 2328.181 | 2328.171 | 4 |
SSSTEERRLHYGENGVQKDVSQSS -18 Da from Cterm region | 4 | 2661.277 | 2661.248 | 11 |
SSSTEERRLHYGENGVQKDVSQSS | 3 | 2679.249 | 2679.248 | 0 |
SQKQITIPSQEQEHSQKANKISYQ | 3, 4 | 2799.416 | 2799.415 | 0 |
SSSTEERRLHYGENGVQKDVSQSSIY | 3 | 2955.404 | 2955.396 | 3 |
SSSTEERRLHYGENGVQKDVSQRSIY | 5 | 3024.449 | 3024.465 | − 5 |
Semenogelin-2 (SEMG2) | ||||
STEERRLNY | 2 | 1166.581 | 1166.568 | 11 |
SSSTEERRLNY | 2 | 1340.645 | 1340.632 | 10 |
YQSSSTEERRLNY | 3 | 1631.753 | 1631.754 | − 1 |
NVVDVREEHSSKLQ | 2 | 1638.832 | 1638.833 | − 1 |
z, charge; mass, monoisotopic mass of uncharged peptide; diff, difference between observed and theoretical mass in parts per million (ppm). Deamination of Asn (N) converts this residue into Asp (D)
Based on the sequence of semenogelin-1, the cleavage site required to generate the –RSIY and –SSIY peptides is Y-S, which is a favored cleavage site for the enzyme kallikrein 3, also known as prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The peptides ending in –RS and –SS are not likely to be products of direct PSA cleavage of semenogelin-1, but these shorter peptides could be formed by the action of NEP on the –RSIY and –SSIY peptides; NEP typically cleaves 2 residues from the C-terminus of peptides. Based on the data for NEP compiled in the MEROPS database, this enzyme was predicted to cleave the C-terminal –IY from either –RSIY or –SSIY peptides, generating the observed shorter peptides (Table 1). However, the residues within the –RSIY and –SSIY sequence are not the optimal residues for NEP cleavage, as indicated in the MEROPS database, suggesting that these would be weak substrates for NEP. With other peptidases, weak substrates can be good inhibitors, and therefore, it was predicted that these peptides would be competitive NEP inhibitors. Therefore, the 11-residue –RSIY peptide was chosen for further studies and named RSIY-11 based on its length (Table 1).
RSIY-11 is a competitive inhibitor of NEP with a lower Ki than opiorphin
A fluorogenic substrate was used to assay NEP; this substrate was found to have a Km of 1.1 μM in our assays (Supplementary Fig. 1). The Lineweaver-Burk plot demonstrated that RSIY-11 acts as a competitive inhibitor of NEP, and a Dixon plot revealed the Ki of RSIY-11 to be 18.4 ± 1.6 μM (Fig. 1a, b). In comparison, the Ki of opiorphin (a well-document endogenous NEP inhibitor) was found to be 265 ± 62 μM (data not shown).
Pre-incubation of RSIY-11 with NEP reduces the level by which RSIY-11 inhibits NEP
To test if incubation of RSIY-11 with NEP influenced the degree of NEP inhibition, the peptide was incubated with enzyme for either 0, 3, or 24 h before adding substrate and measuring enzyme activity. After pre-incubation of RSIY-11 with NEP for 3 h, inhibition of NEP was 26% (p < 0.05), compared with NEP incubated and assayed in the absence of RSIY-11 (Fig. 2). Pre-incubation of RSIY-11 with NEP for 24 h led to a comparable inhibition of NEP of 29% (p < 0.05), relative to NEP incubated and assayed in the absence of RSIY-11 (Fig. 2). Under identical conditions but without the pre-incubation step, the same concentration of RSIY-11 resulted in a 47% reduction in NEP activity (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2). This result strongly suggests that RSIY-11 is both an inhibitor and a substrate of NEP. Because NEP was still active after 24 h incubation and the degree of inhibition did not change between 3 and 24 h incubation; this result implies that RSIY-11 is cleaved to a product that is also an inhibitor of NEP, although less potent than the 11-residue peptide.
Addition of RSIY-11 or opiorphin to semen samples increases sperm motility
Patient and baseline semen parameters are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The average age of the patients (n = 59) included in this study was 38.5 ± 1.1 years old. The average BMI was 29.3 ± 5.9 kg/m2, which is in the overweight range. The average time from semen sample collection to evaluation was 3 h and 28 min. The average number of days since the last ejaculation was 4.3 ± 2.0 days. The average volume, concentration, pH, and morphology (Kruger scale) were 3.1 ± 1.6 cc, 47.3 ± 32.9 million/ml, 7.8 ± 0.27 pH, and 8.6 ± 3.1, respectively.
Following addition of opiorphin (200 μM) or RSIY-11 (0.75 μM, 7.5 μM, or 75 μM) to semen samples, there was a significant increase in sperm motility (both TM and PM), compared with baseline (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). An increase in motility was observed immediately following addition of opiorphin or RSIY-11 and was sustained when motility was determined after 30 and 60 min (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3a–c). The average increase in total motility with opiorphin (200 μM) immediately and at 30 and 60 min following addition was 9.1%, 6.9%, and 8.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). The average increase in total motility with RSIY-11 at 0.75 μM immediately and at 30 and 60 following addition was 9.8%, 7.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. The average increase in total motility with RSIY-11 at 7.5 μM immediately and at 30 and 60 following addition was 8.6%, 7.6%, and 6.9%, respectively. The average increase in total motility with RSIY-11 at 75 μM immediately and at 30 and 60 following addition was 8.2%, 6.6%, and 9.2%, respectively. A significant difference in TM and PM was not seen between baseline and addition of PBS at any time point (Fig. 3a–c).
In the case of patients meeting the definition of asthenospermia (n = 15), a significant increase in TM and PM was seen following addition of opiorphin and RSIY-11 at all concentrations and time points tested (Fig. 4a–c).
The effect of RSIY-11 and opiorphin on sperm motility is dose dependent
In 14 patient samples, the effect of adding lower concentrations of opiorphin and RSIY-11 on sperm motility was investigated. Highly significant increases (p < 0.001) in PM were seen at 0, 30, and 60 min after addition of 20 μM opiorphin to semen samples with an average increase of 11.3 ± 2.5%, 7.7% ± 2.4%, and 7.8% ± 2.3%, respectively, and a highly significant increase (p < 0.001) was seen in TM at the 0-min time point (average increase of 11.5% ± 2.3%, Supplementary Fig. 2). The 2 μM or 0.2 μM concentration of opiorphin did not result in highly significant improvements of TM or PM at any of the time points tested, although the 0.2 μM concentration did show some changes with significance of p < 0.05 or < 0.01 (Supplementary Fig. 2). After addition of RSIY-11 at lower concentrations (0.075 μM, 0.0075 μM, or 0.00075 μM) no significant increase in TM or PM was observed at any of these test concentrations or at any time point (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Discussion
NEP is a ubiquitous enzyme present in human sperm cells and prostasomes, where it degrades peptides thereby reducing their biological activity. Endogenous opioids and bradykinins are amongst the substrates of NEP and have been shown to play a positive role in sperm motility [27–29]. Several previous studies have demonstrated that both synthetic NEP inhibitors and opiorphin (an endogenous NEP inhibitor) can increase sperm motility [10, 12, 18]. To gain insight into the peptides present in semen and if they might play a role in sperm motility, we performed a peptidomic analysis. Whereas proteomic analysis has been extensively applied to studies on semen [8, 9, 30–34], our use of peptidomic analysis is unique to the field. Proteomic analysis is focused on identifying proteins, usually after digestion with trypsin, and therefore cannot distinguish between those peptides that are present in semen from those that are generated artificially during sample preparation. In contrast, peptidomics determines the native forms of peptides in a sample, thereby providing information about the biologically active forms.
Our peptidomic analysis of seminal fluid identified 18 distinct peptides, all of which were derived from semenogelin-1 and semenogelin-2, which are major proteins present in seminal fluid. Several of these novel peptides terminated in RSIY, and some were further truncated by 2 residues from the C-terminus, which is a hallmark of NEP cleavage. Because the RSIY sequence was predicted to be a weak substrate of NEP, based on the cleavage site preferences of NEP, it was a logical candidate to test as an NEP inhibitor. We confirmed that RSIY-11 acts in vitro as a competitive inhibitor of NEP. As with other NEP inhibitors which act as positive modulators of sperm motility, RSIY-11 increased both total and progressive sperm motility [10, 12, 18].
Determining the Ki demonstrated that RSIY-11 inhibits NEP with approximately 15-fold greater potency than opiorphin. Although the ability of opiorphin and RSIY-11 to improve sperm motility was comparable, this is likely due to the differences in peptide concentrations used in the sperm motility assays. Opiorphin was tested at 200 μM, whereas RSIY-11 was effective at much lower concentrations, consistent with its greater potency for NEP. The 200 μM opiorphin concentration was based on a previous study from our laboratory where this concentration demonstrated significant improvement in sperm motility, albeit with a smaller patient sample size [18]. It is also possible that the peptides are inhibitors of other enzymes; for example, opiorphin is known to inhibit aminopeptidase N (APN) which is present on sperm cells and prostasomes [11, 29, 35]. Serial dilution of RSIY-11 to concentrations of 0.75 μM, 7.5 μM, and 75 μM did not generate a graded decrease in sperm motility, but instead showed the same improvement in sperm motility as the higher concentration, although further dilution to 0.075 μM was without effect. It is possible that the effect of RSIY-11 on sperm motility is binary; a certain level of NEP inhibition improves sperm motility beyond which there is no further improvement.
Pre-incubation of RSIY-11 with NEP enzyme for 3 and 24 h resulted in significantly less inhibition compared with no pre-incubation; however, compared with our negative control (no addition of RSIY-11 or opiorphin), it still resulted in a significant level of inhibition. These results are consistent with the competitive inhibitory nature of RSIY-11 to NEP, suggesting that RSIY-11 is a substrate for NEP and undergoes proteolysis. However, it remains to be determined if the remaining inhibitory action of RSIY-11 is due to its incomplete breakdown or if products of its breakdown are also NEP inhibitors, albeit with reduced efficacy.
It is interesting to note that although addition of RSIY-11 and opiorphin to semen on average resulted in improved sperm motility, this was not universal and varied greatly between patients. A possible explanation is that semen from different patients expresses different levels of proteolytic activity. For example, it has been reported that patients with asthenospermia have different levels of APN activity in semen compared with control patients [36]. Further studies are necessary to determine if improvement in sperm motility with addition of RSIY-11 is correlated to levels of RSIY-11 and/or opiorphin and activity levels of NEP and/or APN enzymes.
Our results reveal that sperm motility in patients with asthenospermia improved following the addition of RSIY-11 and opiorphin to semen. Therefore, potential clinical applications of RSIY-11 may be in treatment strategies for male factor infertility related to asthenospermia. For example, addition of RSIY-11 to sperm prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI) may be of benefit to patients with asthenospermia as positive effects on sperm motility persist up to 60 min following addition. In contrast to the sperm samples used for IUIs which undergo washing procedures, the sperm used in the present studies were in unprocessed seminal fluid. Although present on sperm, NEP is found at higher concentrations in prostasomes [11, 29] which are known to play a key role in modulating sperm motility [37, 38]. Washing sperm samples may therefore remove a significant proportion of NEP activity, which may mute the benefit of supplementing sperm with RSIY-11 for IUI.
NEP is widely expressed throughout the body, being found in the brain, intestinal and kidney epithelial cells, neutrophils, thymocytes, and lung, and plays a role in several physiological processes [39–43]. Systemic application of RSIY-11 to treat male factor infertility in its present form is therefore unlikely.
Based on its amino acid sequence, RSIY-11 is clearly a semenogelin-1-derived peptide. Semenogelin-1 is the most abundant protein in human semen, is involved in keeping human semen in a coagulative gelatinous form upon ejaculation, and functions as an anti-motility factor [5]. Liquefaction is associated with sperm motility and occurs upon degradation of semenogelin-1 by PSA [15]. PSA is known to cleave the Tyr-Ser bond within semenogelin-1 that is located on the C-terminus of RSIY-11 [15]. The enzyme responsible for the N-terminal cleavage necessary to produce RSIY-11 is not yet known. A number of peptidases have been identified from proteomic analysis of seminal fluid [8, 9], and further studies are necessary to identify the one responsible for the N-terminal cleavage needed to produce RSIY-11.
The prevailing view is that the primary biological function of semenogelin-1 and semenogelin-derived peptides is to inhibit sperm motility. However, 30 years ago, there was speculation that semenogelin-1 could be processed into a “motility-activating peptide” [16]. Our studies on RSIY-11 have validated the existence of such a peptide; future studies may identify additional peptides that are also able to activate sperm motility.
The generation of RSIY-11 and SPMI likely occurs through the action of proteases responsible for the initial liquefaction and breakdown of semenogelin-1. The presence in semen of both positive and negative peptide regulators of sperm motility suggests an environment of checks and balances to motility determined by the ratios of different peptides. Given that the variation in activity and rates by which different proteases generate peptides, the ratios of positive and negative peptide regulators of motility would likely change over time, providing a mechanism for the progressive changes observed in sperm motility that follows ejaculation.
In conclusion, RSIY-11 is a peptide present in seminal fluid generated from the breakdown of semenogelin-1. It functions as a relatively potent competitive inhibitor of NEP and when added to human semen, increases sperm motility. Further studies are needed to evaluate the concentration of RSIY-11 in human semen, the relation of asthenospermia to levels of RSIY-11, and its evaluation as a therapeutic option for couples suffering from infertility due to male factor infertility.
Electronic supplementary material
Funding information
Funding for these studies were provided by NIH R01 DK107807 (PI: Kelvin P. Davies) and by FINEP and FAPESP 2017/20106-9 (to A. K. Tashima).
Compliance with ethical standards
All studies involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lloyd D. Fricker and Kelvin P. Davies are co-senior authors.
References
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. vol. 2017, 2016.
- 2.Larsen L, Scheike T, Jensen TK, Bonde JP, Ernst E, Hjollund NH, et al. Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1562–1567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.7.1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jouannet P, Ducot B, Feneux D, Spira A. Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl. 1988;11:379–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1988.tb01011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zinaman MJ, Brown CC, Selevan SG, Clegg ED. Semen quality and human fertility: a prospective study with healthy couples. J Androl. 2000;21:145–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Lamirande E. Semenogelin, the main protein of the human semen coagulum, regulates sperm function. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;33:60–68. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turner RM. Moving to the beat: a review of mammalian sperm motility regulation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18:25–38. doi: 10.1071/RD05120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–245. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pilch B, Mann M. Large-scale and high-confidence proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R40. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-r40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fung KY, Glode LM, Green S, Duncan MW. A comprehensive characterization of the peptide and protein constituents of human seminal fluid. Prostate. 2004;61:171–181. doi: 10.1002/pros.20089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pinto FM, Ravina CG, Subiran N, Cejudo-Roman A, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Irazusta J, et al. Autocrine regulation of human sperm motility by tachykinins. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Subiran N, Agirregoitia E, Valdivia A, Ochoa C, Casis L, Irazusta J. Expression of enkephalin-degrading enzymes in human semen and implications for sperm motility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1571–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Subiran N, Pinto FM, Agirregoitia E, Candenas L, Irazusta J. Control of APN/CD13 and NEP/CD10 on sperm motility. Asian J Androl. 2010;12:899–902. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Iwamoto T, Gagnon C. Purification and characterization of a sperm motility inhibitor in human seminal plasma. J Androl. 1988;9:377–383. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1988.tb01069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Iwamoto T, Gagnon C. A human seminal plasma protein blocks the motility of human spermatozoa. J Urol. 1988;140:1045–1048. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)41923-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Robert M, Gibbs BF, Jacobson E, Gagnon C. Characterization of prostate-specific antigen proteolytic activity on its major physiological substrate, the sperm motility inhibitor precursor/semenogelin I. Biochemistry. 1997;36:3811–3819. doi: 10.1021/bi9626158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lilja H, Abrahamsson PA, Lundwall A. Semenogelin, the predominant protein in human semen. Primary structure and identification of closely related proteins in the male accessory sex glands and on the spermatozoa. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:1894–1900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rougeot C, Messaoudi M, Hermitte V, Rigault AG, Blisnick T, Dugave C, Desor D, Rougeon F. Sialorphin, a natural inhibitor of rat membrane-bound neutral endopeptidase that displays analgesic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8549–8554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1431850100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bosler JS, Davies KP, Neal-Perry GS. Peptides in seminal fluid and their role in infertility: a potential role for opiorphin inhibition of neutral endopeptidase activity as a clinically relevant modulator of sperm motility: a review. Reprod Sci. 2014;21:1334–1340. doi: 10.1177/1933719114536473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wisner A, Dufour E, Messaoudi M, Nejdi A, Marcel A, Ungeheuer MN, Rougeot C. Human opiorphin, a natural antinociceptive modulator of opioid-dependent pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17979–17984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605865103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fricker L. Quantitative peptidomics: general considerations. Methods Mol Biol. 1719;2018:121–140. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7537-2_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fricker LD, Lim J, Pan H, Che FY. Peptidomics: identification and quantification of endogenous peptides in neuroendocrine tissues. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2006;25:327–344. doi: 10.1002/mas.20079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morano C, Zhang X, Fricker LD. Multiple isotopic labels for quantitative mass spectrometry. AnalChem. 2008;80:9298–9309. doi: 10.1021/ac801654h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wardman J, Fricker LD. Quantitative peptidomics of mice lacking peptide-processing enzymes. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;768:307–323. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-204-5_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Thomas PD, Huang X, Bateman A, Finn RD. The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D624–DD32. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fricker LD. Limitations of mass spectrometry-based peptidomic approaches. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2015;26:1981–1991. doi: 10.1007/s13361-015-1231-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ulvsback M, Lazure C, Lilja H, Spurr NK, Rao VV, Loffler C, et al. Gene structure of semenogelin I and II. The predominant proteins in human semen are encoded by two homologous genes on chromosome 20. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:18080–18084. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fujisawa M, Kanzaki M, Okada H, Arakawa S, Kamidono S. Metenkephalin in seminal plasma of infertile men. Int J Urol. 1996;3:297–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1996.tb00538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Siems WE, Maul B, Wiesner B, Becker M, Walther T, Rothe L, Winkler A. Effects of kinins on mammalian spermatozoa and the impact of peptidolytic enzymes. Andrologia. 2003;35:44–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.2003.00536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fernandez D, Valdivia A, Irazusta J, Ochoa C, Casis L. Peptidase activities in human semen. Peptides. 2002;23:461–468. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00622-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barazani Y, Agarwal A, Sabanegh ES., Jr Functional sperm testing and the role of proteomics in the evaluation of male infertility. Urology. 2014;84:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Legare C, Droit A, Fournier F, Bourassa S, Force A, Cloutier F, et al. Investigation of male infertility using quantitative comparative proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:5403–5414. doi: 10.1021/pr501031x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gilany K, Minai-Tehrani A, Amini M, Agharezaee N, Arjmand B. The challenge of human spermatozoa proteome: a systematic review. J Reprod Infertil. 2017;18:267–279. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jodar M, Soler-Ventura A, Oliva R, Molecular Biology of R, Development Research G Semen proteomics and male infertility. J Proteome. 2017;162:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Samanta L, Parida R, Dias TR, Agarwal A. The enigmatic seminal plasma: a proteomics insight from ejaculation to fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0358-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pinto M, Rougeot C, Gracia L, Rosa M, Garcia A, Arsequell G, et al. Proposed bioactive conformations of opiorphin, an endogenous dual APN/NEP inhibitor. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3:20–24. doi: 10.1021/ml200182v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Irazusta J, Valdivia A, Fernandez D, Agirregoitia E, Ochoa C, Casis L. Enkephalin-degrading enzymes in normal and subfertile human semen. J Androl. 2004;25:733–739. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Carlsson L, Ronquist G, Stridsberg M, Johansson L. Motility stimulant effects of prostasome inclusion in swim-up medium on cryopreserved human spermatozoa. Arch Androl. 1997;38:215–221. doi: 10.3109/01485019708994880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ronquist G, Brody I. The prostasome: its secretion and function in man. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985;822:203–218. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(85)90008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Erdos EG, Skidgel RA. Human neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP, enkephalinase); function, distribution and release. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;240:13–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1057-0_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Erdos EG, Skidgel RA. Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (enkephalinase) and related regulators of peptide hormones. FASEB J. 1989;3:145–151. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.3.2.2521610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Connelly JC, Skidgel RA, Schulz WW, Johnson AR, Erdos EG. Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 in human neutrophils: cleavage of chemotactic peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:8737–8741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pierart ME, Najdovski T, Appelboom TE, Deschodt-Lanckman MM. Effect of human endopeptidase 24.11 (“enkephalinase”) on IL-1-induced thymocyte proliferation activity. J Immunol. 1988;140:3808–3811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Akiyama H, Kondo H, Ikeda K, Kato M, McGeer PL. Immunohistochemical localization of neprilysin in the human cerebral cortex: inverse association with vulnerability to amyloid beta-protein (Abeta) deposition. Brain Res. 2001;902:277–281. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02390-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.