Abstract
Early phase clinical trials have demonstrated good therapeutic index for oncolytic adenoviruses in patients with solid tumours when administered intratumorally, resulting in local tumour elimination. Entrapment and binding of adenovirus to erythrocytes, blood factors, and neutralising antibodies have prevented efficient systemic delivery and targeting of distant lesions in the clinic. We previously generated the novel replication-selective Ad-3∆-A20T to improve tumour targeting by increasing the viral dose at distant sites. Here, we developed a protocol to directly radiolabel the virus for rapid and sensitive detection by single-photon emitted computed tomography (SPECT/CT) providing a convenient method for determining biodistribution following intravenous administration in murine models. Longitudinal whole-body scans, demonstrated efficient viral uptake in pancreatic Suit-2 and Panc04.03 xenografts with trace amounts of 125I-Ad-3∆-A20T up to 48 h after tail vein delivery. Hepatic and splenic radioactivity decreased over time. Analysis of tissues harvested at the end of the study, confirmed potency and selectivity of mutant viruses. Ad-3∆-A20T-treated animals showed higher viral genome copy numbers and E1A gene expression in tumors than in liver and spleen compared to Ad5wt. Our direct radiolabeling approach, allows for immediate screening of novel oncolytic adenoviruses and selection of optimal viral genome alterations to generate improved mutants.
Subject terms: Cancer imaging, Targeted therapies
Introduction
A promising novel strategy to eliminate solid tumors is the development of cancer-selective, replicating (oncolytic) adenoviral mutants. To date, several adenoviral mutants have been evaluated in clinical trials with demonstrated safety, tumor selectivity and efficacy in conjunction with standard of care interventions1–3. In most trials, viruses were administered intratumorally. However, there is a need to further develop the viruses for efficient systemic delivery in order to reach deep and distant metastatic lesions. Major obstacles include the high-affinity binding to erythrocytes and blood factors, in addition to rapid elimination by hepatic Kupffer cells that greatly decrease the available dose at tumour sites4–7. Much research is aimed at overcoming these hurdles by developing novel mutants with prolonged circulatory half-life to maximise viral concentrations at the tumour sites1,8–10. Biodistribution is usually determined in preclinical in vivo models by harvesting tissues from numerous animals at multiple time points to quantify tumour and tissue uptake. In the current study, we developed a novel strategy to select for optimal mutants by rapid monitoring of viral distribution in individual live animals over time without the need for tissue harvesting at every time point.
We recently modified our potent replication-selective oncolytic adenovirus Ad∆∆11, to generate a novel mutant, Ad-3∆-A20T with attenuated erythrocyte and blood factor binding and specific targeting to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC)12. The de-targeting modifications reduced viral association to human erythrocytes and complement through ablation of viral fibre-binding to the Coxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor (CAR) and Complement Receptor 1 (CR-1)13. To further increase tumour-specific uptake, a 20-amino acid integrin-binding peptide (A20; A20FMDV2) was expressed in the viral fibre-knob12. This peptide, derived from the foot-and-mouth-disease-virus (FMDV), selectively binds to αvß6-integrins with high affinity (KD = 0.2nM) via the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-domain14,15. The αvß6-integrins are frequently overexpressed in pancreatic, breast and colorectal tumours with negligible expression in normal cells16–18. Both Ad-3∆-A20T and the αvß6-integrin targeted wild type virus Ad5A2019,20 preferentially infect αvß6-integrin expressing cells while uptake via the typical Ad5-pathway through αvß3- or αvß5-integrins, is significantly less12. The deletions in the highly cancer-selective and efficacious Ad∆∆ virus in combination with de- and re-targeting modifications resulted in the generation of the PDAC-selective oncolytic mutant Ad-3∆-A20T, an improved clinical candidate for systemic delivery12.
In the current study, we took advantage of the high levels of αvß6-integrins in human PDAC cell lines, and determined viral distribution in xenograft tumours after systemic delivery of the re-targeted and 125I-labelled mutants using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT). Three key areas were investigated in the murine models: (1) the feasibility of radiolabelling adenoviral mutants; (2) the suitability of 125I-labelled viruses for imaging and biodistribution studies; and (3) whether this is achievable without the need to conduct any further genetic alterations to the virus. A common, fast and easy method for radiolabelling of proteins involves incorporating 125I into Tyr-residues which allow for sensitive imaging detection21. However, this method is typically incompatible with biologically active viruses because it is usually performed under non-physiological reaction conditions which include optimal pH and buffer compositions that greatly reduce viral potency22. We hypothesised that small animal live imaging technology, SPECT/CT and MRI would rapidly inform on biodistribution and tissue uptake of virus. Imaging in combination with positive detection of viral protein expression and replication/spread at tissue sites would allow for quicker identification of optimal viral mutations. Once identified, these can be further developed into clinically safe and potent therapies. Longitudinal distribution studies often require the sacrifice of multiple animals to analyse harvested tissues at specific time-points and our strategy could potentially provide an economical solution by shortening the time required for screening viral mutants in addition to reducing the number of animals per study. Imaging technology and quantification of radioactively labelled compounds have frequently been used in the discovery and development phases of peptides for example, [18F]fluorobenzoyl-A20FMDV2 for αvß6-integrins17, 18F-, 11C- and 123I-labelled ligands for the serotonin transporter23 and the somatostatin analogue 111In-octreotide24. Our findings suggest that this strategy can be extended to actively replicating viruses.
The sequential steps described in this study demonstrate a novel approach for allowing the efficient screening of novel replication-selective adenoviral mutants during the preclinical phase of biotherapeutics development in vivo. We highlight the positive practicalities of directly labelling adenoviral mutants with 125I with retained activity for subsequent SPECT/CT image analysis in small animals. We propose a method that can swiftly inform on whole-body distribution, the location of experimental tumours and potential off-target infection sites. In combination with additional biodistribution and mechanistic studies, this method can provide essential data for safe clinical translation.
Results
Optimised 125I radiolabelling conditions retains adenoviral functions
To efficiently radiolabel adenovirus with 125I, we considered the optimal conditions required for the reaction when combining the virus, oxidising agent, and radioisotope. The optimal performance of each of these is dependent on specific buffering conditions at certain pH levels. For example, the activity of Ad5 is optimal under physiological conditions, pH7.2-7.825–27. Outside this range the bioactivity of Ad5 is reduced, primarily due to virion aggregation when pH level is lowered from pH8 to pH428. The radioisotope, Na125I is commercially available in the form of NaI/0.04 M NaOH and is stored at pH10-12 to preserve stability whereas the oxidising reagent (Iodogen) operates most efficiently at pH6.5 and is less efficient at higher pH29,30. It was therefore necessary to identify the optimal pH at which all three reagents were most compatible to perform the radiolabelling process. An overview of the labelling procedure is summarised in Fig. 1A, which include details of the experimental tests used at the earlier stages of protocol development for optimisation purposes.
We tested various reaction conditions in the absence of radioactivity by replacing Na125I in 0.04 M NaOH with non-radioactive NaI in 0.04 M NaOH, to determine the preservation of viral infectivity and replication. The infectivity of I-labelled Ad5A20 (expressing EGFP) in the αvß6-integrin expressing Panc04.03 cells was analysed by flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Viral infection decreased from 42% (positive control) to 15% as a direct consequence of Iodogen exposure, an essential step in the protocol, used to oxidise the NaI prior to virus labelling. A further reduction in infectivity was observed upon addition of NaI/NaOH, due to the alkalinity of NaOH (pH10-12). The addition of 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH6.8 or pH4.0; dependent on batch of Na125I) lowered the final pH to 7.2-7.8 during the oxidation step and thereby partially restored viral infectivity (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Moreover, direct exposure of the virus to Iodogen greatly decreased the viral activity. However, transferral of the oxidised Na125I from the Iodogen tube to a tube containing only the virus and buffer eliminated viral oxidation. We applied the established optimal conditions (pH7.4-7.8 and 100 mM Tris pH4.0) to evaluate infection and replication of our cancer-selective Ad-3∆-A20T labelled with non-radioactive NaI in cultured Suit-2 cells. Infection with I-Ad-3∆-A20T at 100ppc, resulted in 42 ± 3% of infected cells compared to 58 ± 4% for the non-labelled mock control at 24 h (Fig. 1B; left panel). Comparable levels of replication were observed at 24 h, 2.1 × 107 ± 3.5 × 106 pfu/ml (non-labelled) and 2.2 × 107 ± 0.9 × 107 pfu/ml (labelled) which increased to 1.6 × 108 ± 0.8 × 108 pfu/ml and 6.3 × 107 ± 1.1 × 107 pfu/ml, respectively by 48 h (Fig. 1B; right panel).
Next, we used Na125I under the same conditions to evaluate the efficiency of the labelling reaction. The specific activity of free 125I versus virus-bound 125I was determined by thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Fig. 1C). The three viruses used in this study, Ad5A20, Ad-3∆-A20T, and Ad5wt showed labelling efficiencies of 14.2–71.3% with the lowest specific activity for Ad5A20 (Fig. 1C). We observed a dependency on high virus concentrations for higher levels of radiolabelling, explaining the lower specific activity for Ad5A20 that had the lowest viral stock concentration. The sample was electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE to verify that the labelled material was indeed 125I-virus (Fig. 1D). Three discrete radioactive bands were identified with two corresponding to the major adenoviral capsid proteins; hexon (108 kDa), penton (63.3 kDa) and fibre (61.5 kDa) and a third band of ≤10 kDa representing the remaining free 125I in the sample and 125I-Tyr. To separate labelled virus from non-incorporated 125I, column purification was performed. Although pure 125I-labelled virus was successfully isolated, the yield was poor (<25% of functional virus) and its use was subsequently discontinued (Fig. 1D; right panel).
In conclusion, the adapted labelling protocol had minimal effects on viral function; infection and replication rates remained largely unaffected. Although, the modified protocol is not optimal for the iodination reaction, sufficient 125I for imaging analysis was incorporated in the viral capsid proteins (see below).
Detection of 125I-Ad5A20 in pancreatic αvß6-integrin-expressing Panc04.03 xenografts after systemic delivery
We previously determined αvß6-integrin expression in 15 human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines and the highest levels were detected in Panc04.03 cells12. Subcutaneous inoculation of Panc04.03 cells in immune-deficient mice formed small tumours (18–50 µl) after ≥3 weeks with the support of Matrigel. Three mice with bilateral tumours were selected for systemic administration of 125I-Ad5A20 (8.2 × 109 vp/animal; 10.8 MBq/animal) via tail vein injection and were imaged by SPECT/CT (one representative mouse; Fig. 2A, additional images in Supplementary Fig. 2A). The viral particles of 125I-Ad5A20 were detected in tumours at all tested time points (30 min, 2 h, and 4 h after injection), indicating that sufficient amounts had reached the tumour tissue in vivo. High uptake of radioactivity was also observed in the liver and gastrointestinal tract that decreased from 2 h onwards, and likely reflected the presence of free 125I in the injection mixture (<60% of free 125I) in addition to non-specific hepatic elimination of virus and label (Supplementary Fig. 2B). Subsequent image quantification was performed at later time points (24–48 h) to circumvent the initial non-specific abdominal (mainly hepatic) accumulation/clearance of free 125I and 125I-Ad5A20 allowing for more accurate measurement of tumour-associated radioactivity after imaging.
Accumulation of 125I-Ad5A20 in Suit-2 pancreatic tumour xenografts up to 24h after systemic delivery
We have previously established in vivo subcutaneous xenograft models using the human pancreatic αvß6- and αvß5- integrin expressing cancer cell line, Suit-212,31. All subsequent in vivo studies were performed using this model since they rapidly and consistently generate reproducible subcutaneous tumours; 100–200 µl in 2–3 weeks (Fig. 2B left; MRI image). 125I-Ad5A20 was prepared to 2.5 mBq/vp whereby 39% of 125I in the reaction mixture was incorporated into the virus. A total of 7 × 109 vp of 125I-Ad5A20 was injected via the tail vein in each mouse (n = 3). The majority of radioactivity was detected in liver and spleen 4 h after administration (Supplementary Fig. 2C) that markedly decreased after 24 h when radioactivity levels were higher in tumours than in hepatic tissue (one representative animal in coronal and transverse views, SPECT/CT images; Fig. 2B right). Whilst the radioactivity associated with the liver, spleen and gastrointestinal tract decreased over time (4–24 h), levels in urine increased (Fig. 2B, additional images in Supplementary Fig. 3A).
Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the retargeted Ad5A20 quickly reached the tumours after systemic delivery and was maintained up to 24 h. Additionally, tumour volumes estimated by the MRI survey scan correlated with end point volume (tumour weight) (160 µl in Fig. 2B), and was similar to calliper measurements (140 µl). Combining calliper measurements with MRI and SPECT/CT imaging is therefore a valuable strategy for determining viral efficacy, internal tumour growth and tissue distribution, respectively, over time.
Rapid uptake of the 125I-labelled oncolytic mutant Ad-3∆-A20T and Adwt in Suit-2 pancreatic tumour xenografts followed by efficient elimination by liver and spleen
Direct intratumoral administration of Adwt or our novel, retargeted replication-selective Ad-3∆-A20T mutant caused significant inhibition of tumour growth in Suit-2 xenograft models (18d; Fig. 3A)12. The feasibility of intravenous delivery of Ad-3∆-A20T was investigated using 125I-labelled virus in conjunction with SPECT/CT imaging. 125I-Ad5wt or 125I-Ad-3∆-A20T were administered via the tail vein (7 × 109 vp) in animals with Suit-2 xenografts (n = 4/group). Radioactivity was detected in tumours, liver and spleen from 4 to 48 h (125I-Ad-3∆-A20T, 24 and 48 h and 125I-Adwt, 48 h; Fig. 3B, additional images Supplementary Fig. 3B). After correcting for injected dose (% radioactivity incorporated into virus and total amount administered) and tissue weight at the end of the study, quantification of the SPECT/CT images showed no significant differences in tumour uptake between treatment groups (Fig. 4A; left panel) (Liver; Supplementary Fig. 4). Tumour to liver ratios of radioactivity were also similar at these early time points (Fig. 4A; right panel). These observations were verified by direct measurements of radioactivity in tissues harvested at the end of the study (48 h) (Fig. 4B).
More potent viral E1A-expression in Suit-2 tumours after systemic delivery of the oncolytic mutant Ad-3∆-A20T than with Adwt
To investigate whether tissue-associated radioactivity correspond to the presence of virus, expression of the early viral gene E1A was determined in tumour and spleen tissues at the end of the study. Interestingly, animals treated with 125I-Ad-3∆-A20T presented with higher levels of the E1A protein in tumours, and lower levels in spleen compared to tissues harvested from animals treated with 125I-Ad5wt (Fig. 5A, complete immunoblot Supplementary Fig. 6). Contrastingly, the radioactivity levels in both treatment groups was similar (Fig. 4A,B). These findings suggest that the initial tumour-associated radioactivity is a result of virus distribution in the tumour microenvironment by the “leaky” vasculature often associated with tumours. Following the accumulation of virus in the tumours, cellular uptake of both 125I-Adwt and 125I-Ad-3∆-A20T rapidly proceeds which is dependent on multiple integrins. In the case of 125I-Ad-3∆-A20T, the virus can enter the cell via specific binding to the αvβ6-integrin receptor, whereas αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins which are highly expressed on Suit-2 cells, provide additional routes for cellular entry while 125I-Adwt enter only through αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins. However, the higher levels of E1A-expression in tumours infected with 125I-Ad-3∆-A20T at 48 h after administration suggest that αvβ6-targeting play more important roles in viral spread after subsequent rounds of viral replication and cell lysis within the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, viral replication of Ad-3∆-A20T in Suit-2 cells grown in monocultures peaked after 96 h, compared to Ad5wt which peaked at 48–72 h, producing more viral particles over a longer duration (Fig. 5B). These results verify that after the initial distribution of radioactively labelled virus, at the later stage, higher amounts of functional Ad5-3∆-A20T accumulated in tumours compared to Ad5wt. As could be expected radioactivity rapidly declined in all tissues over time, reflecting the elimination of labelled capsid proteins once the virus is de-coated and initiates new rounds of replication while the tumour-specific targeting and cell lysis is essential for efficient intra-tumoral spread over time.
Replication of the oncolytic retargeted Ad-3∆-A20T mutant proceeds at higher levels than Ad5wt after systemic delivery
To further validate the biodistribution of radiolabelled viruses, native non-labelled Ad-3∆-A20T and Ad5wt were administered via the tail vein in Suit-2 xenografted animals at identical viral doses. Quantitative PCR revealed that both viruses reached the tumour, spleen and liver tissues at 24–48 h after systemic administration (Fig. 5C; Supplementary Fig. 5). Relative viral genome amplification was determined as fold change obtained by normalising the E1A DNA levels in tumour and spleen to the liver per animal. We detected higher levels of viral amplification in tumour tissue compared to liver at both 24 h and 48 h time points for Ad-3∆-A20T (Fig. 5D). The retargeted virus was indeed directed more towards the tumour than the liver. Conversely, higher viral amplification was detected in liver tissues in animals treated with Ad5wt than Ad-3∆-A20T. Upon comparison between both viruses, no significant differences in viral genome quantities were detected in the splenic tissues at these low doses reflecting mainly receptor-independent macrophage-mediated clearance of virus in this organ7,32. To conclude, Ad-3∆-A20T readily infected tumours at sufficient levels to promote viral genome amplification while Ad5wt infected hepatic tissue more readily.
Discussion
To date, clinical efficacy with oncolytic adenoviral mutants have been reported following intratumoral administration however, the major challenge of targeting and eliminating metastatic lesions remains to be addressed. The short half-life of adenoviruses in the human circulation is attributable to rapid blood factor binding leading to immediate hepatic and macrophage mediated elimination, unfavourably decreasing the dose at distal lesions4,6,7. Several strategies have been used to overcome these obstacles including, capsid modifications, polymer-coating33,34 and delivery by mesenchymal stem cells35 to attenuate Factor X-binding, hepatic elimination and ablation of erythrocyte- and neutralising antibody-binding10,19,36. Our approach was to retarget our selective and potent oncolytic adenovirus Ad∆∆, to αvß6-expressing pancreatic cancers by introducing the high affinity A20FMDV integrin-ligand and ablate the CAR and CR-1 binding to erythrocytes, by generating Ad-3∆-A20T12. To investigate Ad-3∆-A20T tumor targeting efficiency and biodistribution in longitudinal imaging studies in live animals, and to avoid further genetic alterations of the highly modified virus, we established a novel protocol for radioactive labelling followed by SPECT/CT analysis. We adapted the Iodogen method for labelling of virus with Na125I and demonstrated the feasibility of this approach by monitoring the initial virus uptake in tumor and normal tissue in real time.
Several radioactive labeling techniques of proteins and peptides with 125I have been established that are routinely used to generate trace compounds with high specific activity including the Chloramine T, Iodogen and Bolton-Hunter methods21,29,30. While these labeling techniques rarely cause alterations of structure and function of proteins and peptides, application of the same conditions to biologically active viruses frequently result in detrimental effects to the viral life cycle with greatly reduced viral activity22. To date and to our knowledge, imaging of adenoviruses that have been directly radiolabeled have not been feasible. This is largely due to the irreversible modifications of the capsid proteins ensued by non-physiological reaction conditions that drastically decrease or prevent viral infection, genome amplification and gene expression. In addition, the high protein concentrations that promote efficient iodination are not achievable for adenoviruses due to the tendency of virions to aggregate at high concentrations25,27. Step-by step modifications of the standard Iodogen iodination conditions enabled sufficient incorporation of 125I into adenoviral mutants for preclinical SPECT/CT imaging while preserving viral bioactivity. The standard conditions for Iodogen-mediated oxidation of NaI (e.g. basic pH and low salt concentrations), significantly reduced viral activity, an outcome most likely caused by structural changes in the fibre and other capsid proteins preventing receptor binding and/or cellular internalization. Increasing the buffer capacity, avoiding direct exposure of virus to the oxidizing agent and prolonging the reaction time overcame these challenges resulting in functional virus. Despite lower efficiency of radioisotope incorporation with this adapted protocol, we were able to determine the initial distribution of several labeled adenoviruses in real time by SPECT/CT imaging in two PDAC xenograft models. In contrast to genetically engineered viruses such as those that express the human Na/I symporter (hNIS), requiring the modification of each mutant and delivery of 125I or 131I at high doses (e.g.37,38), our simpler direct labeling method does not require any genetic engineering and therefore enables for quicker results. Similarly, viral mutants expressing EGFP or RFP fluorescent proteins or Luciferase enzymes also require genetic modifications and the methods used for detection are generally less sensitive.
Our novel Ad-3∆-A20T mutant was designed to specifically target αvß6-integrin expressing PDAC tumours via systemic delivery not only to reach the deep anatomical location of the pancreas within the abdominal cavity but also to reach the widespread metastatic sites12,39. Interestingly, both the αvß6-integrin targeted Ad-3∆-A20T and the non-targeted Ad5wt viruses reached pancreatic subcutaneous tumours after systemic delivery in mice. It is well documented that elimination of adenoviruses takes place at hepatic Kupffer cells in a receptor-independent manner which is largely responsible for its short circulatory half-life in mice but also in humans. Human blood factors such as Factor X (FX) and IX (FIX) mediate hepatic adenovirus infection by bridging the virus to heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) mainly on hepatocytes5,6. However more importantly, Ad5 hepatotoxicity is less severe in humans than in mice possibly due to the entrapping of human erythrocytes by the virus, decreasing the rate of hepatocyte uptake and Kupffer cell clearance4. The high affinity binding of Ad5 to CAR and CR-1 on erythrocytes in humans does not occur in the murine circulation. In our study, it is therefore likely that the apparent similar uptake-rates of Ad5wt and Ad-3∆-A20T in tumours were due to the lack of Ad5wt erythrocyte-binding since the ablation of CAR- and CR-1-binding, a “design feature” of the Ad-3∆-A20T could not be demonstrated in our murine model as such binding is obsolete in mice. Another reason for the similar immediate distribution of radioactivity to the xenografted tumours may be due to the “leaky” vasculature often present in tumours. The actions of enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) may have disguised any differences in initial receptor-mediated cellular uptake of Adwt and Ad-3∆-A20T, whilst also supporting the accumulation of both viruses to the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, endocytosis of virus within tumour cells may not be solely dependent on αvß6-integrin binding, since Suit-2 cells express other receptors important for adenoviral binding and internalisation including CAR, αvß3- and αvß5-integrins12. Overall, our findings demonstrate that in mice, the initial tumour uptake of both 125I-labelled and non-labelled Adwt and Ad-3∆-A20T was rapid after systemic delivery. The maximum amount of the tumour-associated radiolabelled virus was reached at 4–24 h post-administration, but more importantly by 48 h, Ad-3∆-A20T replication proceeded at higher levels than Adwt. Presumably, the improved intra-tumoural spread and replication for Ad-3∆-A20T was caused by additional rounds of replication in the tumour microenvironment. In support of this assumption, Ad-3∆-A20T genomes and E1A expression were present at higher levels than Adwt by 48 h in tumours. In parallel, a decreased accumulation of Ad-3∆-A20T, reflecting the reduced genome amplification and replication compared to Adwt in liver tissue was observed. Taken together, we demonstrate that systemic delivery of the αvß6-integrin retargeted Ad-3∆-A20T virus reached subcutaneous tumour xenografts in athymic mice and propagated more efficiently within the tumours than the native Ad5wt virus.
Unfortunately, one limitation of studying adenoviruses in murine models is the lack of viral binding to murine erythrocytes and blood factors, which is a major obstacle for delivery in humans. However, we and others previously demonstrated that the modifications incorporated in Ad-3∆-A20T decreased binding to human erythrocytes and Factor IX/complement-4 binding protein (C4BP) which could result in higher circulating levels of virus in patients6,20,40. We expect that additional modifications of the virus may be required prior to clinical evaluation specifically, modifications of hexon to prevent the binding of neutralising antibodies and/or binding to FX8,10. The combination of CAR-binding ablation and specific tumour targeting are effective design strategies that can be included in future oncolytic mutants to improve delivery and efficacy in patients with metastatic solid tumours.
To conclude, our findings suggest that radioactive labelling of replicating oncolytic adenoviral mutants is an effective approach for studying adenoviruses in a preclinical setting without the need for time-consuming genetic modifications nor significantly compromising viral bioactivity. Combined with the SPECT/CT imaging vital information such as viral biodistribution, viral elimination rate and any off-target effects over time, all this can be recorded in a cost-effective, time-saving manner without affecting data quality. The imaging platform is a sensitive tool for studying experimental tumour lesions and may be useful for determining viral uptake in orthotopic tumours and otherwise inaccessible tumours in live animals. Further refinements to the method will be necessary to enable improved detection. For example, removal of unincorporated label or conjugation of virus to prelabelled prosthetic groups for higher in vivo stability and labelling efficiency. The strategy holds promise for efficient selection of viral modifications and mutants prior to more extensive preclinical and clinical applications.
Materials and Methods
Tissue culture
Human Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines Suit-2 (Cell Services, Cancer Research UK) and Panc04.03 (ATCC, LGC Standards, UK) were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)/1% penicillin and streptomycin (Penicillin 10000 units/ml, Streptomycin 10 mg/ml; P/S) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO). Cells were regularly monitored for mycoplasma, and were STR-profiled (LGC Standards and Cancer Research UK) to confirm identical profiles to those reported by the suppliers and to the original vial.
Viruses and infections
The viruses used in the study include the previously described modified EGFP-expressing mutants generated from species C wild-type adenovirus type 5 (Ad5wt) and Ad5A20 also expressing the 20 amino acid FMDV peptide in the fibre11,19. Generation of Ad∆∆ (deleted in E1ACR2 and E1B19K) and Ad5-3∆-A20T (Ad∆∆; deleted in E3gp19K, ablated in CAR and CR-1 binding, and expressing the FMDV peptide) were previously described11,12. The viruses were produced, purified and characterised according to standard protocols11,41. The viral particle (vp) to infectious unit (plaque-forming units; pfu) was 10–50 vp/pfu for all viruses. All infections were performed in serum-free DMEM and 2 h later the infection-media was replaced with 10% FBS/1% P/S in DMEM.
Radiolabelling of virus
The optimised reaction conditions were as described below. Tris-HCl buffer 200 mM pH6.8 (1 ml) was added to a precoated Iodogen (1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3α,6α-diphenyl glycoluril) tube (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) and removed, followed by the addition of 20–27 µl of Tris-HCl buffer (200 mM, pH6.8) and 25–33.3 µl of Na125I (85–123 MBq) in 0.04 M NaOH (Hartmann GmbH, Germany). After 2 min, the reaction mixture was transferred to an aliquot of 200–267 µl of virus (1.23 × 108–2.62 × 1010 vp; 7.2 µg–7.65 µg protein) and incubated for another 2 min, 24 °C. The final reaction mixture was pH7.4-7.8. The radiolabelling efficiency was measured using iTLC-SG (Agilent, CA) with a mobile phase of 85% MeOH, and exposed on phosphor screens, detected by Cyclone (Perkin Elmer, CT) and analysed by the OptiQuant software. The percentage of free Na125I and virus-bound 125I was determined. The reaction mixture was diluted with PBS containing 0.01% BSA. Aliquots were analysed for viral integrity and function by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and radioactive viral proteins were detected on phosphor screens (Cyclone). In some studies, free 125I was removed by column purification (Virabind™) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cell Biolabs, CA) for further analysis of 125I-labelled virus. In these experiments, 10 µg of Tyrosine (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the labelled sample before column purification. Identical reaction protocols using non-radioactive NaI were applied to evaluate viral infectivity and replication by flow cytometry, immunoblotting, qPCR and replication assays.
Immunoblotting
Tumours and spleens were collected from mice and homogenised by sonication in ice-cold RIPA Buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail and PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland). The protein concentration of each lysate sample was determined using the BCA assay as per manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific). To each 20 µg of lysate sample, 2 × Laemmli buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl pH6.8, 20% glycerol, 4% SDS, 0.01% bromophenol blue, 10% β-mercaptoethanol) was added and incubated at 95 °C for 5 min. Protein lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE using the Bio-Rad system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd, UK) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (ThermoFisher Scientific). Membranes were incubated with mouse anti-E1A (1:400; M58, GeneTex, TX), and mouse anti-vinculin (1:2000; Abcam, UK) overnight at 4 °C in PBS containing 5% non-fat milk and 0.1% Tween (PBS-T). After washing with PBS-T, membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with anti-mouse HRP conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000; Dako, UK). Protein bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (ECL; PerkinElmer) and visualised using digital capture (iChemi-XT imaging system; Syngene, UK). Densitometric analysis was performed using the NIH Image J software.
Flow cytometry
Cellular infectivity was quantified by monitoring the percentage of EGFP positive cells using flow cytometry. Cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1 × 105cells/well), incubated at 37 °C for 24 h prior to infection with EGFP-expressing viruses (Adwt, Ad5A20) for 2 h at 37 °C. The infection media was replaced with DMEM/10% FBS, cells were incubated for 24 or 48 h and detached with Trypsin. Detached cells were washed twice and resuspended in DMEM/0.1%BSA in preparation for flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, UK). The percentages of cells detected in the FL1 setting were compared to non-infected cells, acquiring 10,000 events per sample and analyzed using the FlowJo software 8.8.6 (Tree Star Inc.).
In vivo studies
All in vivo experiments were performed under the approved UK Home Office Project Licence P1EE3ECB4 at Barts Cancer Institute in accordance with the Animals Scientific Procedures Act 1986.
In vivo tumour growth and viral tissue distribution
Tumour cells were inoculated subcutaneously in one or both flanks of CDnu/nuathymic mice (Charles River, UK) with Suit-2 cells in sterile PBS (1 × 106cells/200 µl) and Panc04.03 cells in PBS:Matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:1) (1 × 106cells/200 µl). Tumour volumes were estimated twice weekly by calliper measurements: volume = (length × width2 × π)/6, and animals were monitored and treated according to UK Home Office Regulations. When tumours were 110 ± 30 µl animals were randomised to treatment groups and administrated the respective virus.
For viral distribution studies of non-radioactive mutants, purified viruses (Adwt, Ad-3∆-A20T) were administered via the tail vein with a single injection of 3 × 109 vp in 100 µl. Tumours, spleen and liver were harvested 24, 48 and 72 h later, homogenised, and protein expression determined by immunoblotting and/or viral DNA determined by qPCR.
In vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
In addition to calliper measurements of subcutaneous tumours, MRI was used to monitor subcutaneous and internal tumour spread. Mice were imaged by MRI (Bruker Icon 1T) on a heated bed to preserve body temperature (36.5–37.5 °C) and were subjected to isoflurane anaesthesia (flow rate of 1.5l/min, maintenance level of 1.5–2%). The anaesthetic level was adjusted so that the respiratory rate was approximately 30–60 breaths per minute as measured by a pressure sensitive pad. Respiratory gating was also employed to minimise movement artefacts; images were recorded between breaths. Eyes were kept hydrated with eye-gel (lubrithal 321/00/12/PUVPT, Dechra). A T2 survey scan was carried out using Paravision 6.0.1 software with a repetition time (TR) of 3377 ms and echo time (TE) of 84 ms. For each scan (4 min), 14 slices were obtained with a thickness of 1.25 mm and a slice gap of 0.25 mm. Each slice contains 110 × 110 pixels, with a resolution of 0.273 × 0.273 mm, corresponding to a field of view of 30 × 30 mm. An estimate of the tumour volume and potential internal spread was obtained by drawing 3D regions of interest (ROI) using VivoQuant software (version 3.5, InviCRO LLC, MA).
In vivo Nano-SPECT/CT imaging
For viral distribution studies using radioactive viruses and SPECT/CT imaging, viral particles (Ad5wt, Ad5A20T and Ad-3∆-A20T, typically 3–8.2 × 109 vp in 100 µl of iodination reaction mixture (20 MBq) were administered via the tail vein with a single injection. Thirty minutes prior to viral administration, 5 mg NaClO4 in 500 µl PBS was delivered intraperitoneally to each animal to block uptake of free iodine via the Na/I symporter (NIS). Animals were anesthetized with 2% Isoflurane gas in air/O2 (1 l/min) for whole body imaging at 0.5, 1, 4, 24, and 48 h after virus administration. All studies were performed according to UK Home Office Regulations. SPECT-imaging was performed using a NanoSPECT/CT four-head camera (Bioscan Inc, Washington D.C.) fitted with 1.4 mm pinhole collimators in helical scanning mode (24 projections, 40 min acquisition). CT images were acquired with a 45-kVP X-ray source (1500 ms exposure, 180 projections). In some studies, a multiple bed system was used to allow three mice to be imaged simultaneously with body temperatures maintained at 36.5–37.5 °C via a warm air heating system. Reconstructed images were merged (CT recon; InVivoScope Invicro LLC and SPECT recon; HiSPECT, Scivis GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) and the region of interest (ROI) was analysed using VivoQuant software (Invicro LLC). 125I activity in tumour, liver and spleen was quantified with 3D ROI analysis. Radioactivity in tumours, liver and spleen was corrected for % labelled virus injected in each animal and normalized to the weight of the tumour at the end of the study. For liver tissues representative fixed liver volumes were used for the 3D ROI analysis. After completion of the 48 h imaging time-points tumours, liver and spleens were collected, weighed and processed for immunoblotting, and radioactivity was quantified using a Compugamma CS counter (LKB Instruments, Australia).
Quantitative PCR
Whole tumour, spleen and liver tissues were removed and collected from mice at 24–72 h after tail vein administration of Adwt or Ad5–3∆-A20T. Serum free media (500 µl) were added to tissue specimens and were mechanically dispersed in cell strainers (70 µM, Falcon). Samples were lysed in 200 µl lysis buffer (ATL buffer) provided in the DNA extraction kit (DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, Qiagen). Double-stranded DNA extraction proceeded according to the manufacturer’s instructions after determining quality and quantity of harvested DNA (Nanodrop; ThermoFisher, Scientific, UK). Quantitative PCR was performed using 20 µg of extracted DNA in 20 µl reaction mixture containing Power SYBR Green Mastermix (ThermoFisher). Relative changes in viral DNA amplification was determined by the ∆∆CT method relating the DNA levels in tumour and spleen to the liver levels in each animal. The following primers were used: E2A F (5′-GGA TAC AGC GCC TGC ATA AAA G-3′); E2A R (5′-CCA ATC AGT TTT CCG GCA AGT-3′); GAPDH F (5′ TGG GCT ACA CTG AGC ACC AG-3′) and GAPDH R (5′ GGG TGT CGC TGT TGA AGT CA-3′). For absolute quantification of viral genomes in the same tissue specimens, a standard curve was generated using pure genomic Ad5wt DNA as template. The following primers were used: E1A F 5′ TGT ACC GGA GGT GAT CGA TCT 3′; E1A R′ TCG TCA CTG GGT GGA AAG C 3′. The thermal cycling profile were: 2 min at 50 °C, 10 min at 95 °C and 40 cycles of 15s at 95 °C and 1 min of 60 °C. Assays were performed in MicroAmp Optical 96-Well plates and Real-Time PCR system 7500 (Applied Biosystems, CA).
Viral replication by the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay
Suit-2 cells were seeded into 6 well plates at 1 × 105 cells/well and after 24 h, cells were infected with 100 particles per cell (ppc) of Ad5-3∆-A20T. Cell culture media and cells containing virus were collected and freeze-thawed three times in liquid nitrogen at 24 h–192 h post infection. Viral samples were serially diluted in 96-well plates containing A549 cells (1 × 104/well) as detector cells. Viral replication was determined as previously described for TCID50 assays11,12.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleagues at the Centers for Molecular Oncology and Imaging for helpful discussions and advice. We want to thank Dr Lynda Coughlan for generation of the FMDV-expressing wild type mutant. We greatly appreciate the excellent assistance by Julie Andow, Tracy Chaplin-Perkins and Hagen Schmidt. This study was supported by a generous grant from the UK Charity Pancreatic Cancer UK (PCUK; RIF 2015) and by the BCI CRUK Centre Grant [grant number C16420/A18066].
Author Contributions
G.H., J.S. and S.M. conceived of the study and designed all experiments. S.M. and E.C. conducted all cell- and virus-based experiments and analysed the data. JF performed the SPECT/CT imaging and together with G.H. analysed the imaging data, and JS directed the radiolabelling studies. GH performed and analysed all in vivo data. A.L.P. and J.A.D. engineered the Ad-3∆-A20T virus. S.M. and G.H. wrote the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-49150-9.
References
- 1.Koski A, et al. Biodistribution Analysis of Oncolytic Adenoviruses in Patient Autopsy Samples Reveals Vascular Transduction of Noninjected Tumors and Tissues. Molecular therapy: the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2015;23:1641–1652. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fukuhara H, Ino Y, Todo T. Oncolytic virus therapy: A new era of cancer treatment at dawn. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1373–1379. doi: 10.1111/cas.13027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nattress CB, Hallden G. Advances in oncolytic adenovirus therapy for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018;434:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carlisle RC, et al. Human erythrocytes bind and inactivate type 5 adenovirus by presenting Coxsackie virus-adenovirus receptor and complement receptor 1. Blood. 2009;113:1909–1918. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-178459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jonsson MI, et al. Coagulation factors IX and X enhance binding and infection of adenovirus types 5 and 31 in human epithelial cells. J Virol. 2009;83:3816–3825. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02562-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shayakhmetov DM, Gaggar A, Ni S, Li ZY, Lieber A. Adenovirus binding to blood factors results in liver cell infection and hepatotoxicity. J Virol. 2005;79:7478–7491. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7478-7491.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alba R, et al. Biodistribution and retargeting of FX-binding ablated adenovirus serotype 5 vectors. Blood. 2010;116:2656–2664. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-12-260026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alemany R. Oncolytic Adenoviruses in Cancer Treatment. Biomedicines. 2014;2:36–49. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines2010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hemminki O, et al. Immunological data from cancer patients treated with Ad5/3-E2F-Delta24-GMCSF suggests utility for tumor immunotherapy. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4467–4481.. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Uusi-Kerttula, H. et al. Ad5NULL-A20: A Tropism-Modified, alphavbeta6 Integrin-Selective Oncolytic Adenovirus for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Therapies. Clin Cancer Res (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Öberg, D et al. Improved potency and selectivity of an oncolytic E1ACR2 and E1B19K deleted adenoviral mutant (Ad∆∆) in prostate and pancreatic cancers. Clin Canc Res: 541–553 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Man YKS, et al. The Novel Oncolytic Adenoviral Mutant Ad5-3Delta-A20T Retargeted to alphavbeta6 Integrins Efficiently Eliminates Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:575–587. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coughlan L, et al. Tropism-modification strategies for targeted gene delivery using adenoviral vectors. Viruses. 2010;2:2290–2355. doi: 10.3390/v2102290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dicara D, et al. Foot-and-mouth disease virus forms a highly stable, EDTA-resistant complex with its principal receptor, integrin alphavbeta6: implications for infectiousness. J Virol. 2008;82:1537–1546. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01480-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Slack RJ, et al. Pharmacological Characterization of the alphavbeta6 Integrin Binding and Internalization Kinetics of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Derived Peptide A20FMDV2. Pharmacology. 2016;97:114–125. doi: 10.1159/000443180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bates RC, et al. Transcriptional activation of integrin beta6 during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition defines a novel prognostic indicator of aggressive colon carcinoma. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2005;115:339–347. doi: 10.1172/JCI200523183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hausner SH, et al. Targeted in vivo imaging of integrin alphavbeta6 with an improved radiotracer and its relevance in a pancreatic tumor model. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5843–5850. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Allen MD, et al. Altered microenvironment promotes progression of preinvasive breast cancer: myoepithelial expression of alphavbeta6 integrin in DCIS identifies high-risk patients and predicts recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:344–357. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coughlan L, et al. In vivo retargeting of adenovirus type 5 to alphavbeta6 integrin results in reduced hepatotoxicity and improved tumor uptake following systemic delivery. J Virol. 2009;83:6416–6428. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00445-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coughlan L, et al. Combined fiber modifications both to target alpha(v)beta(6) and detarget the coxsackievirus-adenovirus receptor improve virus toxicity profiles in vivo but fail to improve antitumoral efficacy relative to adenovirus serotype 5. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23:960–979. doi: 10.1089/hum.2011.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Macias MT. Use of radionuclides in cancer research and treatment. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009;11:143–153. doi: 10.1007/S12094-009-0330-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frost EH. Radioactive labelling of viruses: an iodination technique preserving biological properties. J Gen Virol. 1977;35:181–185. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-35-1-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang Y, et al. [(18)F]Diphenyl sulfide derivatives for imaging serotonin transporter (SERT) in the brain. Nucl Med Biol. 2018;66:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Laverman P, Sosabowski JK, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ. Radiolabelled peptides for oncological diagnosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(Suppl 1):S78–92. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2014-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Croyle MA, Roessler BJ, Davidson BL, Hilfinger JM, Amidon GL. Factors that influence stability of recombinant adenoviral preparations for human gene therapy. Pharmaceutical development and technology. 1998;3:373–383. doi: 10.3109/10837459809009865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rexroad J, Evans RK, Middaugh CR. Effect of pH and ionic strength on the physical stability of adenovirus type 5. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2006;95:237–247. doi: 10.1002/jps.20496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lusky M. Good manufacturing practice production of adenoviral vectors for clinical trials. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16:281–291. doi: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Galdiero F. Adenovirus aggregation and preservation in extracellular environment. Arch Virol. 1979;59:99–105. doi: 10.1007/BF01317899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Woltanski KP, Besch W, Keilacker H, Ziegler M, Kohnert KD. Radioiodination of peptide hormones and immunoglobulin preparations: comparison of the chloramine T and iodogen method. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1990;95:39–46. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1210932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fraker PJ, Speck JC., Jr. Protein and cell membrane iodinations with a sparingly soluble chloroamide, 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-3a,6a-diphrenylglycoluril. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978;80:849–857. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(78)91322-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bhattacharyya M, Francis J, Eddouadi A, Lemoine NR, Hallden G. An oncolytic adenovirus defective in pRb-binding (dl922-947) can efficiently eliminate pancreatic cancer cells and tumors in vivo in combination with 5-FU or gemcitabine. Cancer gene therapy. 2011;18:734–743. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2011.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bradshaw AC, et al. Biodistribution and inflammatory profiles of novel penton and hexon double-mutant serotype 5 adenoviruses. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2012;164:394–402. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nguyen, T. V. et al. Comparison of Liver Detargeting Strategies for Systemic Therapy with Oncolytic Adenovirus Serotype 5. Biomedicines5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Fan G, et al. Bio-inspired polymer envelopes around adenoviral vectors to reduce immunogenicity and improve in vivo kinetics. Acta Biomater. 2016;30:94–105. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Morales-Molina, A et al. (2018). Antitumor virotherapy using syngeneic or allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell carriers induces systemic immune response and intratumoral leukocyte infiltration in mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Ma J, et al. Manipulating adenovirus hexon hypervariable loops dictates immune neutralisation and coagulation factor X-dependent cell interaction in vitro and in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004673. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yuan MH, et al. Therapeutic effects of adenovirus-mediated CD and NIS expression combined with Na(131)I/5-FC on human thyroid cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:7431–7436. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rajecki M, et al. SPECT/CT imaging of hNIS-expression after intravenous delivery of an oncolytic adenovirus and 131I. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oettle H. Progress in the knowledge and treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: from benchside to bedside. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:1039–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bradshaw AC, et al. Requirements for receptor engagement during infection by adenovirus complexed with blood coagulation factor X. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001142. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leitner S, et al. Oncolytic adenoviral mutants with E1B19K gene deletions enhance gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in pancreatic carcinoma cells and anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1730–1740. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.