Abstract
Despite recent advances in the treatment of medulloblastoma, patients in high-risk categories still face very poor outcomes. Evidence indicates that a subpopulation of cancer stem cells contributes to therapy resistance and tumour relapse in these patients. To prevent resistance and relapse, the development of treatment strategies tailored to target subgroup specific signalling circuits in high-risk medulloblastomas might be similarly important as targeting the cancer stem cell population. We have previously demonstrated potent antineoplastic effects for the PI3Kα selective inhibitor alpelisib in medulloblastoma. Here, we performed studies aimed to enhance the anti-medulloblastoma effects of alpelisib by simultaneous catalytic targeting of the mTOR kinase. Pharmacological mTOR inhibition potently enhanced the suppressive effects of alpelisib on cancer cell proliferation, colony formation and apoptosis and additionally blocked sphere-forming ability of medulloblastoma stem-like cancer cells in vitro. We identified the HH effector GLI1 as a target for dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition in SHH-type medulloblastoma and confirmed these results in HH-driven Ewing sarcoma cells. Importantly, pharmacologic mTOR inhibition greatly enhanced the inhibitory effects of alpelisib on medulloblastoma tumour growth in vivo. In summary, these findings highlight a key role for PI3K/mTOR signalling in GLI1 regulation in HH-driven cancers and suggest that combined PI3Kα/mTOR inhibition may be particularly interesting for the development of effective treatment strategies in high-risk medulloblastomas.
Subject terms: Paediatric cancer, Preclinical research, CNS cancer, Cancer stem cells
Introduction
Medulloblastoma is one of the most common malignant brain tumours in paediatric patients accounting for approximately 20% of all paediatric brain tumours1. Though overall survival has improved with multimodal therapy including maximal surgical resection, radiation therapy, and multi-agent chemotherapy, this disease remains a significant cause of brain cancer morbidity and mortality2. Genomic studies have revealed four molecular subgroups; Wingless/Integrated (WNT), Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 43. These subgroups are biologically distinct and show differences in demographics, patterns of dissemination, and outcomes4. Of the 4 subtypes, SHH medulloblastoma is the most frequent in infants and adults5,6. Due to the very poor clinical outcome of some SHH medulloblastoma patients, the WHO has recently revised this classification, with new subclasses distinguishing between SHH, TP53 wild-type and SHH, TP53 mutant medulloblastoma7. Patients with SHH-driven medulloblastoma frequently exhibit either germline or somatic mutations and copy-number alterations in genes that regulate the Hedgehog (HH) signalling pathway such as PTCH1, SUFU, SMO, GLI1, GLI2 and MYCN8. As a consequence, these genetic changes result in constitutive transcriptional activation of HH target genes, such as glioma-associated oncogene (GLI) transcription factors, that can promote cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Aberrant HH signalling in cancer has led to the development of smoothened (SMO) inhibitors that target HH upstream components, thereby blocking target gene transcription9. However, SMO inhibitors in younger patients may result in complications due to the essential role of HH signalling during development10,11. Additionally, in humans and mice, SHH-type medulloblastomas acquire resistance to SMO inhibitors9,12,13. The aforementioned challenges outline major impediments for the utility of SMO inhibitors in paediatric cancers and have encouraged the search for alternative routes to target HH downstream effectors in SHH-driven paediatric cancers.
There is extensive crosstalk between the HH pathway and other pathways that can trigger GLI transcription factor activation in the absence of canonical HH signalling14. This has driven development of research seeking to identify putative oncogenic targets that are not part of the canonical HH pathway but stimulate GLI transcription factor activity through non-canonical routes. One such pathway is triggered by mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR)/S6K1 mediated phosphorylation of GLI1, resulting in GLI1 nuclear translocation and activation of HH target genes15. Additionally, crosstalk between the mTOR and HH pathways cooperates to promote mRNA translation through inhibition of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) and stimulation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) expression16,17. Consistent with this, dual inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR and HH pathways has been shown to suppress tumour growth and increase survival in a medulloblastoma flank xenograft mouse model18. Importantly, upregulation of components of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway has been reported in SMO resistant medulloblastomas and concurrent combination of SMO antagonists with PI3K/mTOR inhibitors blocks tumour growth and prevents the development of resistance to SMO inhibitors19,20. This key role for mTOR has recently been corroborated by another study, reporting that loss of mTORC1 function blocks development of SHH-driven medulloblastoma17. Remarkably, pharmacologic mTOR inhibition was found to reduce tumour growth and increase survival in a SMO inhibitor resistant medulloblastoma transgenic mouse model17. Thus, accumulating evidence indicates that blocking components of the PI3K/mTOR pathway may be a promising approach for HH driven cancers.
Activation of PI3K signalling has been reported in medulloblastoma and may contribute to development and progression of this cancer21–23. Importantly, strategies targeting PI3K are not limited to SHH-driven medulloblastoma because pharmacological PI3K inhibition has also shown promise in MYC-driven Group 3 mouse models of medulloblastoma23. Elevated PI3K/AKT activity in glioma stem cells suggests generally important roles for this pathway in brain cancer stem cells (CSCs)24. Additionally, the PI3K/AKT pathway is activated after irradiation in nestin-positive cells in medulloblastoma mouse models, likely to promote survival and resistance of CSCs21. Accordingly, inhibition of PI3K signalling was shown to inhibit proliferation and promote differentiation of stem-like cancer cells in medulloblastoma25. Further, our own studies have demonstrated a key role for the PI3Kα catalytic isoform (p110α) in sphere forming medulloblastoma cells and showed disruption of cancer stem cell frequencies after PIK3CA knockdown26. Taken together, the PI3K pathway is attracting increasing recognition as a potential target to eradicate brain CSCs regardless of medulloblastoma subtype.
While the important contributions of PI3K/AKT activation for medulloblastoma development suggest that PI3K inhibitors might show promise for the treatment of this tumour, the narrow therapeutic window of pan-PI3K inhibitors has been discouraging27. Efforts to determine the discrete roles of PI3K isoforms and the clinical utility of isoform-selective inhibitors for PI3Ks indicate improved target selectivity, with lower toxicity28. Recent advances in the development of inhibitors of the alpha catalytic isoform suggest PI3Kα may be of particular interest for therapeutic approaches29. However, several studies have found that selective PI3Kα inhibition results in activation of the mTOR pathway to promote survival and resistance30–33.
Here, we sought to investigate the therapeutic effects of combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition in medulloblastoma and in particular the effects on the CSC population. We report evidence for a discrete role of the PI3Kα/mTOR pathway in SHH subtype medulloblastoma. We found dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition strongly reduced the amount of nuclear GLI1 protein in HH-driven medulloblastoma and similar results were observed in Ewing sarcoma, another HH-driven paediatric cancer. Finally, combined PI3Kα and mTOR targeting disrupted cancer stem cell frequencies in vitro and significantly inhibited tumour growth in a flank tumour xenograft mouse model in vivo. These results suggest that selective PI3Kα targeting combined with mTOR inhibition has a therapeutic effect in medulloblastoma and potentially other HH-driven paediatric cancers.
Results
Alpelisib and OSI-027 inhibit PI3K/mTOR signalling and exhibit antineoplastic effects in medulloblastoma cells
Alpelisib is a PI3Kα-specific inhibitor with a tolerable safety profile34. However, several independent studies reported activation of resistance pathways, including mTORC1 signalling, that confer resistance to alpelisib in several solid tumours30–33. Thus, we sought to investigate the effects of simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kα and mTOR in DAOY and D556 medulloblastoma cells. We chose two cell lines that represent the highest risk category with very poor prognosis; DAOY representing the SHH, TP53 mutated and D556 representing the Group 3 MYC amplified category8,35,36. Combined treatment with alpelisib and the catalytic mTOR inhibitor OSI-027 decreased phosphorylation of AKT (Ser473), S6K1 (Thr389), and 4E-BP1 (Thr37/46) (Fig. 1A,B). These results suggest that combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition potently blocks signalling of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis in medulloblastoma. This prompted us to study the biological effects of combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition. Initial experiments examined the dose response curves for inhibition of cell viability by alpelisib and OSI-027. In DAOY and D556 cells, combination of alpelisib with OSI-027 resulted in stronger suppression of cell viability as compared to either agent alone (Fig. 1C,D). In DAOY cells, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) decreased from 12.31 μM (alpelisib) and 1.703 μM (OSI-027) to 0.59 μM for the combination treatment (alpelisib and OSI-027) (Fig. 1C). In D556 cells, the IC50 decreased from 21.2 μM (alpelisib) and 5.889 μM (OSI-027) to 3.035 μM for the combination of alpelisib and OSI-027 (Fig. 1D). We next calculated the combination index (CI) for this drug combination. The CI defines additive effects (CI = 1), synergism (CI < 1) or antagonism (CI > 1)37. The combination of alpelisib with OSI-027 resulted in synergistic effects in both cell lines with CI values of 0.393 for DAOY and 0.636 in D556 cells, respectively. These findings are consistent with potent synergistic inhibitory effects in both cell lines, with such synergism being more potent in SHH-driven DAOY cells as compared to D556 cells that represent Group 3 medulloblastoma. In further studies, we found growth of colonies in soft agar was also potently inhibited by the combination of alpelisib and OSI-027 (Fig. 1E,F). Additionally, the combination of the two agents increased the rate of apoptosis substantially more than either agent alone (Fig. 1G,H). Together, these results suggest that catalytic mTOR inhibition strongly enhances the antineoplastic effects of selective PI3Kα inhibition in medulloblastoma cells.
PIK3CA expression is elevated in the SHH-subgroup and correlates with GLI1 expression in medulloblastoma
Recently, at least four major subtypes of medulloblastoma have been described3,38. We next sought to investigate whether distinct subgroups may show different dependencies on the PI3Kα signalling axis. Analysis using the Northcott dataset39 revealed that PIK3CA was most highly expressed in SHH subtype medulloblastoma (Fig. 2A). PIK3CA expression was also found to positively correlate with expression of the HH effector transcription factor glioma-associated oncogene 1 (GLI1) (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, pathway enrichment analysis indicates that GLI1 expression is significantly associated with the “PI3K-AKT signalling pathway” in medulloblastoma (Fig. 2C). Together, these data indicate a correlation between PIK3CA expression and GLI1 in medulloblastoma and raise the possibility of a functional relationship between PI3Kα signalling and the GLI1 transcription factor in HH driven cancers.
Dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition decrease the amount of nuclear GLI1 and exhibit potent antineoplastic effects in Ewing sarcoma cells
GLI1 phosphorylation by the mTOR/S6K1 pathway promotes GLI1 nuclear localization and transcriptional activity, providing a mechanism for smoothened (SMO)-independent GLI1 activation15. We examined the effects of PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition on GLI1 nuclear accumulation in SHH-driven medulloblastoma using nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation of DAOY cells with Lamin A/C and tubulin as nuclear and cytoplasmic loading controls, respectively. Combination of alpelisib and OSI-027 resulted in a decrease of nuclear GLI1 protein amounts, which was more pronounced as compared to single agent treatment (Fig. 3A). Next, we sought to investigate whether this GLI1 regulation by PI3Kα/mTOR is also evident in other HH-driven paediatric cancers. GLI1 transcription is directly induced by Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1-Friend leukemia virus integration 1 (EWS-FLI1), which promotes carcinogenesis of Ewing sarcoma Family of Tumors (ESFT)40. Therefore, we employed two Ewing sarcoma cell lines (TC71 and RDES) to examine GLI1 cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution in this cancer. Importantly, in TC71 and RDES Ewing sarcoma cells, combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition resulted in reduced nuclear GLI1 (Fig. 3B,C). The reduction of GLI1 protein in the nucleus after dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition indicates a requirement for PI3Kα and mTOR activities to sustain nuclear GLI1 in HH-driven cancers. HH-driven cancers strongly depend on nuclear GLIs for transcriptional activation of GLI target genes to promote proliferation and tumorigenesis41. Therefore, reduced nuclear GLI protein may contribute to suppression of tumour cell proliferation. In line with this, TC71 and RDES Ewing sarcoma cells exhibited high sensitivity to alpelisib and OSI-027 with IC50 values in the nanomolar range for the alpelisib/OSI-027 combination (TC71: 74 nM; RDES: 189 nM) (Fig. 3D,E). Additionally, dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition significantly reduced anchorage-independent growth of TC71 and RDES cells in soft agar as compared to either drug alone (Fig. 3F,G). These data support a role for PI3Kα and mTOR activities in maintaining nuclear GLI1 protein and inhibition of PI3Kα and mTOR disrupts the accumulation of GLI1 in the nucleus which may, at least in part, contribute to greatly reduced cell viability and colony formation in HH-driven paediatric cancers.
Inhibition of PI3Kα or PIK3CA knockdown reduces sphere formation and disrupts medulloblastoma stem cell frequencies when combined with pharmacologic mTOR inhibition
Next we sought to test the effects of combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition on stem-like cancer cells grown in 3-D. Ewing sarcoma spheroids may not represent a reliable system to study stem-like cancer cell biology42. By contrast, we and others have shown that medulloblastoma cells grown under cancer stem cell conditions form 3-D neurospheres that adopt cancer stem cell characteristics26,43–45. We have also demonstrated a key role for the alpha catalytic PI3K isoform in medulloblastoma sphere-forming cells26. Therefore, we used medulloblastoma neurospheres grown in 3-D to study sphere-forming ability of stem-like cancer cells. Neurosphere growth was potently inhibited by alpelisib and OSI-027 and combination of both inhibitors resulted in significantly stronger blockade of neurosphere growth than either drug alone (Fig. 4A,B). These results indicate greatly reduced sphere-forming ability of medulloblastoma neurospheres after dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition.
We have previously investigated distinct roles for Class IA PI3K isoforms and reported that expression of PIK3CA correlates with the expression of pluripotency/stem cell markers in medulloblastoma suggesting an important role for PI3Kα in the biology of medulloblastoma CSCs26. In line with this, we demonstrated an essential role for PIK3CA but not PIK3CB or PIK3CD in maintaining self-renewal capacities of stem-like cancer cells as judged by disruption of stem cell frequencies after knockdown of Class IA catalytic isoforms in extreme limiting dilution analysis (ELDA)26. However, evidence from breast cancer suggests a role for mTORC1 in resistance to selective PI3Kα inhibition and thus a requirement for mTORC1 blockade to enhance efficacy of PI3Kα inhibition30,32. Also, our previous work has demonstrated that the effects of PIK3CA knockdown or pharmacological PI3Kα inhibition can be enhanced by concomitant inhibition of pro-survival pathways in medulloblastoma26. Therefore, we used RNA interference (RNAi) to determine a possible role for mTOR activity in maintaining CSC frequencies after PIK3CA knockdown. PIK3CA knockdown strongly reduced the proportion of cells with self-renewal capacity in both DAOY (Fig. 4C) and D556 (Fig. 4D) cells. Importantly, the combination of OSI-027 with PIK3CA knockdown significantly reduced stem cell frequencies over either PIK3CA knockdown or OSI-027 single agent alone. Specifically, stem cell frequencies in DAOY dropped from 1 in 394.2 cells for PIK3CA knockdown or 1 in 544 for OSI-027 to 1 in 1526.8 for the combination PIK3CA knockdown and OSI-027 (Fig. 4E). Similar results were observed for D556 where stem cell frequencies decreased from 1 in 221.1 for PIK3CA knockdown or 1 in 123.4 for OSI-027 to 1 in 1366.4 for the combination (Fig. 4F). Chi-square analysis revealed these changes in stem cell frequencies were highly significant (Fig. 4G,H left panels). Knockdown of p110α protein was monitored by western blot analysis (Fig. 4G,H right panels). These results indicate that pharmacologic mTOR inhibition enhances the disruptive effects of PIK3CA knockdown on stem cell frequencies and suggest dual inhibition of PI3Kα and mTOR is required to efficiently block self-renewal capabilities of medulloblastoma CSCs.
Dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition reduces tumour growth in a medulloblastoma flank tumour xenograft
Given the potent antineoplastic effects of alpelisib and OSI-027 in vitro, we next sought to investigate the effects of dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition in vivo. As DAOY cells are representatives of high-risk SHH-driven medulloblastoma35, we used a DAOY medulloblastoma flank tumour xenograft mouse model to study the antitumor activity of combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition. DAOY cells in matrigel were injected subcutaneously in the flanks of nude mice and when tumours were palpable, mice were treated with vehicle controls (VC), alpelisib, OSI-027 or the alpelisib/OSI-027 combination (5 days treatment, 2 days rest followed by another 4 days treatment). While each drug moderately reduced the rate of tumour growth relative to vehicle control treated mice, the alpelisib/OSI-027 combination significantly reduced tumour growth as compared to either drug alone (Fig. 5A). The absence of obvious changes in body weight suggests that the combination of alpelisib with OSI-027 at these concentrations was well tolerated while still reducing tumour growth (Fig. 5B).
Discussion
Current treatments have produced promising results for many patients diagnosed with medulloblastoma, but not for patients with high-risk tumours. Due to the poor prognosis of some SHH medulloblastomas, the 2016 WHO consensus conference has reclassified subgroups into: WNT, SHH and TP53 wild-type, SHH and TP53 mutant, and non-WNT/non-SHH (encompassing Group 3 and Group 4 within this subgroup)7. Together with Group 3, metastatic and Group 3 MYC amplified medulloblastoma, SHH, TP53 mutant medulloblastoma has been identified as the highest risk category with very poor prognosis, as evident from 5-year overall survival rates of only 41%8,36. This very poor prognosis resulted in listing these patients with SHH, TP53 mutations as their own category by the WHO7,46.
In the current study, we investigated the effects of combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition in two of the highest risk category medulloblastoma cells, with DAOY cells representing the SHH, TP53 mutant and D556 cells representing the Group 3 MYC amplified categories35. The p110α isoform is highly expressed or activated among medulloblastoma patient samples47, and several investigations have been reporting promising results for targeting PI3K signalling in the SHH-driven subgroup17–19 and the MYC-driven Group 323,48. We utilized the PI3Kα selective inhibitor alpelisib, because the alpha catalytic isoform p110α exerts important roles in medulloblastoma47,49 and is the only Class IA PI3K essential for sphere-forming ability and stem cell frequencies in medulloblastoma stem-like cancer cells26. Isoform-selective PI3Kα inhibitors are now extensively exploited because of higher efficacy and lower toxicity as compared to pan-PI3K inhibitors29. Alpelisib is one such PI3Kα selective inhibitor with encouraging results in early phase clinical trials and has a suitable safety profile34. However, it has been reported that tumours develop resistance to alpelisib by activation of the mTOR pathway30,31,33. Therefore, we reasoned that alpelisib should be tested in combination with pharmacological mTOR inhibitors. We found that the combination of alpelisib with the catalytic mTOR inhibitor OSI-027 efficiently blocked signalling of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, exhibited potent antineoplastic effects, induced apoptosis and inhibited sphere formation. Additionally, knockdown of PIK3CA (encoding p110α) in combination with OSI-027 disrupted stem cell frequencies. Thus, dual PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition is a comprehensive strategy that includes targeting the CSC population and therefore shows promise for treatment of high-risk category medulloblastoma in different subgroups.
Interestingly, PIK3CA expression is highest in the SHH subgroup (see Fig. 2A). Also, expression of the HH effector GLI1 correlates with PIK3CA expression and is associated with enrichment of the PI3K-AKT pathway (see Fig. 2B,C). GLI transcription factors are the main downstream effectors of the canonical and the non-canonical HH cascade and are involved in the stimulation of multiple oncogenic signalling pathways41. We found nuclear GLI1 protein amounts were reduced in DAOY cells after combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition, indicating a role for PI3K/mTOR signalling in the regulation of GLI1 in the SHH subgroup. This observation prompted us to further investigate the mechanistic role of PI3Kα and mTOR in additional HH-driven paediatric cancers.
Survival and tumorigenesis of Ewing sarcoma is dependent on EWS-FLI1, a constitutively active chimeric transcription factor50. The HH effector GLI1 is a direct transcriptional target of EWS-FLI1 and exerts key roles in Ewing sarcoma tumorigenesis40. We chose Ewing sarcoma because this tumour type was shown to directly dependent on GLI1 and knockdown or inhibition of GLI1 exerts antineoplastic effects in this cancer40,51,52. We found that combination of alpelisib and OSI-027 resulted in substantial reduction of GLI1 nuclear protein. This suggests that continuous activity of the PI3K/mTOR axis is required to maintain high levels of GLI1 in the nucleus and inhibition of this pathway results in a reduction of nuclear GLI1 protein amounts. This is in agreement with the finding that the mTOR downstream effector S6K1 directly phosphorylates GLI1, resulting in nuclear translocation and activation of GLI1 independent of SMO15. Significantly, Ewing sarcoma cells were highly sensitive to PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition with IC50 values in the nanomolar range for the combination of both inhibitors. These findings suggest that PI3K/mTOR signalling contributes to tumorigenesis in HH-driven paediatric cancers through non-canonical activation of HH downstream effectors independently of canonical HH signalling through SMO. They further raise the possibility of targeting the PI3K/mTOR axis as a promising therapeutic approach in HH driven cancers that are resistant to SMO inhibitors. This notion is supported by the finding of the TC71 Ewing Sarcoma cell line showing resistance to the SMO inhibitor cyclopamine40, while being highly susceptible to combined PI3Kα and mTOR inhibition in the nanomolar range. This is of particular interest because medulloblastomas resistant to SMO inhibitors have been shown to activate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway19,20. Thus it is possible that increased PI3K and mTOR activities contribute to SMO inhibitor resistance by sustaining high nuclear GLI1 levels. In line with this, PI3K/mTOR inhibitors interfere with the development of resistance to SMO inhibitors in medulloblastoma19. Hence, PI3Kα/mTOR targeting might be a promising strategy for HH-driven cancers that are resistant to SMO inhibitors.
Here, we demonstrate potent anti-tumor effects after dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition that may be mediated, at least in part, by disrupting nuclear GLI1. Still, given the complexity of the crosstalk between the HH and PI3K/mTOR pathways, it is possible that inhibitory effects on additional pathway components contribute to these antineoplastic effects. Further mechanistic studies will be required to elucidate to which extent the disruption of stem cell frequencies, the inhibition of mTOR mediated mRNA translation and the inhibitory effects on nuclear GLI1 protein contribute to this phenotype. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that HH-driven paediatric cancers can be targeted by inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway and raise the interesting possibility that this strategy might be exceptionally efficient in cancers that are highly dependent on non-canonical HH signalling and that are resistant to SMO inhibitors.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and reagents
DAOY and D556 medulloblastoma cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and gentamycin (0.1 mg/ml). TC71 and RDES Ewing sarcoma cells were grown in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin (100 ng/ml). 3-D stem-like cancer cell cultures were described in detail previously26,53,54. The identity of established cell lines was authenticated by short-tandem repeat (STR) analysis (Genetica DNA Laboratories) in December 2017 (medulloblastoma lines) and August 2016 (Ewing sarcoma lines). All cells were grown at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Aleplisib (BYL-719) and OSI-027 were purchased from ChemieTek and dissolved in DMSO as vehicle for in vitro studies.
Immunoblotting and antibodies
Cells were lysed in phosphorylation lysis buffer (pH 7.9) containing 50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitors (Roche). For cell fractionation, the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher) was used according the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein concentration was quantified by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) with the Synergy HT plate reader and Gen5 software (Biotek). Equal amounts of protein lysate were subjected to SDS–PAGE (Bio-Rad) followed by transfer to Low Fluorescent PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA or 5% milk and cut horizontally to allow for incubation with different primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then incubated in secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody for 1 hour, and analysed using the WesternBright ECL substrate (GE Healthcare) and either autoradiography film (Denville Scientific) or the ChemiDoc MP Imaging System and Image Lab 5.0 software (Bio-Rad) as described26. Antibodies were removed, where indicated, using Restore PLUS Western Blot Stripping Buffer (Thermo Fisher) to allow for incubation with additional antibodies. A comprehensive list of antibodies used in this study can be found in Supplemental Table 1. Uncropped blots are presented in the supplement.
Cell viability and apoptosis assays
Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1 (Roche) as described previously26. Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1,500 cells per well (for medulloblastoma cell lines) or 5,000 cells per well (Ewing sarcoma cell lines) with the indicated drugs. After incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 5 days, the WST-1 reagent (10% v/v) was added and cell viability was assessed using the Synergy HT plate reader and Gen5 software (BioTek) as described55. Apoptosis assay was done as described before56.
Soft agar assays
For investigation of anchorage-independent cell growth, soft-agar assays were performed using the CytoSelect 96-Well Cell Transformation Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, medulloblastoma and Ewing sarcoma cells were seeded in soft-agar in a 96-well plate and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 with the indicated inhibitors for 7 days (medulloblastoma cell lines) or 10 days (Ewing sarcoma cell lines) before agar was solubilized and cells were lysed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Colony formation was assessed as previously described55.
Bioinformatics and statistical analysis
For gene expression analysis, the GlioVis portal57 was employed to obtain data of the Northcott_2012 dataset39. These data were subjected to analysis in GraphPad Prism 7.0 as described before26. Also, statistical analyses were performed using Prism Graphpad 7.0, including calculation of IC50 values. For comparison of more than two groups one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used followed by Tukey’s test. For comparison of more than two groups and multiple time points, two-way ANOVA was used followed by Tukey’s test. Comparison of stem cell frequencies of different groups for ELDA was done by Chi square (χ2) test. CI values were calculated for the IC50 values using Compusyn as described before58.
siRNA-mediated knockdown of gene expression
PIK3CA and control siRNA were from Dharmacon (GE Healthcare) and used with the Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent and the Opti-MEM medium (Thermo Fisher) as described previously26.
Neurosphere assay and extreme limiting dilution analysis (ELDA)
DAOY and D556 cells were seeded at indicated cell concentrations in round-bottom 96-well plates (Costar) containing serum free media and the indicated drugs and incubated for one week at 37 C in 5% CO2. After 1 week, spheres were stained with acridine orange as previously described54. Spheres for neurosphere assay were imaged as described in26 and spheres for ELDA were imaged as described previously54. Extreme limiting dilution analysis (ELDA) was carried out as previously described26 using the ELDA online software (http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/software/elda/).
DAOY flank tumour xenograft study
Mouse studies were carried out in accordance with approved protocols by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Northwestern University. Five to 6-week-old athymic nude female mice (NU/NU strain 088; Crl:NU-Fox1nu) were purchased from Charles River and housed under aseptic conditions. Flank tumours were established by subcutaneous injection of 5 × 106 cells in Matrigel (Corning). Mice were monitored and tumours were measured by calliper as described before26. For in vivo studies, alpelisib was dissolved in Ora-Plus and OSI-027 was dissolved in 20% Trappsol in water and both drugs were administered by oral gavage. Mice were treated with (i) vehicle control (VC); (ii) alpelisib (50 mg/kg); (iii) OSI-027 (25 mg/kg); or (iv) the combination of alpelisib (50 mg/kg), and OSI-027 (25 mg/kg).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Northwestern University’s Center for Advanced Microscopy and the Flow Cytometry Core Facility for assistance. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01-CA121192, R01-CA77816, and by grant I01CX000916 from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: F.E., J.C., J.B.B., L.C.P. Development of methodology: F.E., J.C., J.B.B., E.M.B. Acquisition of data: F.E., J.C., J.B.B., G.T.B. Analysis and interpretation of data: F.E., J.C., J.B.B., E.M.B., L.C.P. Oversight of project development: F.E., S.G., L.C.P. Writing of the manuscript: F.E., L.C.P. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data Availability
Datasets and analysis tools used in this study can be accessed from the GlioVis portal (http://gliovis.bioinfo.cnio.es/).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Frank Eckerdt and Jessica Clymer contributed equally.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-49299-3.
References
- 1.Ostrom QT, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010-2014. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:v1–v88. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Massimino M, et al. Childhood medulloblastoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;105:35–51. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Northcott PA, et al. Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1408–1414. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taylor MD, et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123:465–472. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ng JM, Curran T. The Hedgehog’s tale: developing strategies for targeting cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:493–501. doi: 10.1038/nrc3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang SY, Yang JY. Targeting the Hedgehog Pathway in Pediatric Medulloblastoma. Cancers (Basel). 2015;7:2110–2123. doi: 10.3390/cancers7040880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Louis DN, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–820. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Northcott PA, et al. Medulloblastoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:11. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Girardi, D., Barrichello, A., Fernandes, G. & Pereira, A. Targeting the Hedgehog Pathway in Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Cells. 8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Robinson GW, et al. Irreversible growth plate fusions in children with medulloblastoma treated with a targeted hedgehog pathway inhibitor. Oncotarget. 2017;8:69295–69302. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rodon J, et al. A phase I, multicenter, open-label, first-in-human, dose-escalation study of the oral smoothened inhibitor Sonidegib (LDE225) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1900–1909. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robinson GW, et al. Vismodegib Exerts Targeted Efficacy Against Recurrent Sonic Hedgehog-Subgroup Medulloblastoma: Results From Phase II Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Studies PBTC-025B and PBTC-032. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2646–2654. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yauch RL, et al. Smoothened mutation confers resistance to a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor in medulloblastoma. Science. 2009;326:572–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1179386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Carballo GB, Honorato JR, de Lopes GPF, Spohr T. A highlight on Sonic hedgehog pathway. Cell Commun Signal. 2018;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12964-018-0220-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Y, et al. The crosstalk of mTOR/S6K1 and Hedgehog pathways. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:374–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mainwaring LA, Kenney AM. Divergent functions for eIF4E and S6 kinase by sonic hedgehog mitogenic signaling in the developing cerebellum. Oncogene. 2011;30:1784–1797. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu CC, et al. mTORC1-Mediated Inhibition of 4EBP1 Is Essential for Hedgehog Signaling-Driven Translation and Medulloblastoma. Dev Cell. 2017;43:673–688 e675. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chaturvedi NK, et al. Improved therapy for medulloblastoma: targeting hedgehog and PI3K-mTOR signaling pathways in combination with chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2018;9:16619–16633. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Buonamici S, et al. Interfering with resistance to smoothened antagonists by inhibition of the PI3K pathway in medulloblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:51ra70. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Metcalfe C, et al. PTEN loss mitigates the response of medulloblastoma to Hedgehog pathway inhibition. Cancer Res. 2013;73:7034–7042. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hambardzumyan D, et al. PI3K pathway regulates survival of cancer stem cells residing in the perivascular niche following radiation in medulloblastoma in vivo. Genes Dev. 2008;22:436–448. doi: 10.1101/gad.1627008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hartmann W, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/AKT signaling is activated in medulloblastoma cell proliferation and is associated with reduced expression of PTEN. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3019–3027. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pei Y, et al. HDAC and PI3K Antagonists Cooperate to Inhibit Growth of MYC-Driven Medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hambardzumyan D, Squatrito M, Carbajal E, Holland EC. Glioma formation, cancer stem cells, and akt signaling. Stem Cell Rev. 2008;4:203–210. doi: 10.1007/s12015-008-9021-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frasson C, et al. Inhibition of PI3K Signalling Selectively Affects Medulloblastoma Cancer Stem Cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:973912. doi: 10.1155/2015/973912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Eckerdt, F. et al. Potent Antineoplastic Effects of Combined PI3Kalpha-MNK Inhibition in Medulloblastoma. Mol Cancer Res (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Fruman DA, Rommel C. PI3K and cancer: lessons, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:140–156. doi: 10.1038/nrd4204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thorpe LM, Yuzugullu H, Zhao JJ. PI3K in cancer: divergent roles of isoforms, modes of activation and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:7–24. doi: 10.1038/nrc3860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Denny WA. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase alpha inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2013;23:789–799. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2013.779673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Elkabets M, et al. mTORC1 inhibition is required for sensitivity to PI3K p110alpha inhibitors in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:196ra199. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Le X, et al. Systematic Functional Characterization of Resistance to PI3K Inhibition in Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1134–1147. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Leroy C, et al. Activation of IGF1R/p110beta/AKT/mTOR confers resistance to alpha-specific PI3K inhibition. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:41. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0697-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vora SR, et al. CDK 4/6 inhibitors sensitize PIK3CA mutant breast cancer to PI3K inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:136–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Juric D, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase alpha-Selective Inhibition With Alpelisib (BYL719) in PIK3CA-Altered Solid Tumors: Results From the First-in-Human Study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1291–1299. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu J, Margol A, Asgharzadeh S, Erdreich-Epstein A. Pediatric brain tumor cell lines. J Cell Biochem. 2015;116:218–224. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhukova N, et al. Subgroup-specific prognostic implications of TP53 mutation in medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2927–2935. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chou TC. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:621–681. doi: 10.1124/pr.58.3.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho YJ, et al. Integrative genomic analysis of medulloblastoma identifies a molecular subgroup that drives poor clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1424–1430. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.5148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Northcott PA, et al. Subgroup-specific structural variation across 1,000 medulloblastoma genomes. Nature. 2012;488:49–56. doi: 10.1038/nature11327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Beauchamp E, et al. GLI1 is a direct transcriptional target of EWS-FLI1 oncoprotein. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:9074–9082. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806233200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Didiasova, M., Schaefer, L. & Wygrecka, M. Targeting GLI Transcription Factors in Cancer. Molecules. 23 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Leuchte K, et al. Anchorage-independent growth of Ewing sarcoma cells under serum-free conditions is not associated with stem-cell like phenotype and function. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:845–852. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nor C, et al. The histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate promotes cell death and differentiation and reduces neurosphere formation in human medulloblastoma cells. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;48:533–543. doi: 10.1007/s12035-013-8441-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pastrana E, Silva-Vargas V, Doetsch F. Eyes wide open: a critical review of sphere-formation as an assay for stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:486–498. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zanini C, et al. Medullospheres from DAOY, UW228 and ONS-76 cells: increased stem cell population and proteomic modifications. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ramaswamy V, et al. Risk stratification of childhood medulloblastoma in the molecular era: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:821–831. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1569-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guerreiro AS, et al. Targeting the PI3K p110alpha isoform inhibits medulloblastoma proliferation, chemoresistance, and migration. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6761–6769. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ehrhardt M, et al. The PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 displays promising in vitro and in vivo efficacy for targeted medulloblastoma therapy. Oncotarget. 2015;6:802–813. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Salm F, et al. The Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase p110alpha Isoform Regulates Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor Expression via c-Myc and miR-125b to Promote Cell Proliferation in Medulloblastoma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: Ewing sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2000;123:1–26. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4608(00)00295-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zwerner JP, et al. The EWS/FLI1 oncogenic transcription factor deregulates GLI1. Oncogene. 2008;27:3282–3291. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Joo J, et al. GLI1 is a central mediator of EWS/FLI1 signaling in Ewing tumors. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bell JB, et al. HDL nanoparticles targeting sonic hedgehog subtype medulloblastoma. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18100-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Eckerdt F, et al. A simple, low-cost staining method for rapid-throughput analysis of tumor spheroids. Biotechniques. 2016;60:43–46. doi: 10.2144/000114372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Eckerdt F, et al. Regulatory effects of a Mnk2-eIF4E feedback loop during mTORC1 targeting of human medulloblastoma cells. Oncotarget. 2014;5:8442–8451. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bell JB, et al. MNK Inhibition Disrupts Mesenchymal Glioma Stem Cells and Prolongs Survival in a Mouse Model of Glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2016;14:984–993. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bowman RL, et al. GlioVis data portal for visualization and analysis of brain tumor expression datasets. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:139–141. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Iqbal A, et al. Targeting of glioblastoma cell lines and glioma stem cells by combined PIM kinase and PI3K-p110alpha inhibition. Oncotarget. 2016;7:33192–33201. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Datasets and analysis tools used in this study can be accessed from the GlioVis portal (http://gliovis.bioinfo.cnio.es/).