Abstract
Wingless and shorter winged stick insects are very common today, but most known extinct stick insects had fully developed wings, leading to contentious affinities among the extinct winged and extant groups. We report herein three male winged stick insects, assigned to Pterophasmatidae fam. nov., from mid-Cretaceous Myanmar (Burmese) amber. Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. are regarded as transitional taxa from extinct winged to modern wingless and shorter winged stick insects based on their similar tegmina venation with extinct Susumanioidea and some body features the same as extant Phasmatodea. However, their symmetric phallic organs comprising two consistent phallomeres are different from those of all living groups. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the extinct winged taxa, including the new family, are the stem groups of modern stick and leaf insects, and all of them constitute the clade of Phasmatodea. New findings indicate winged and wingless stick insects' morphologies diversified significantly during or before the mid-Cretaceous.
Keywords: Pterophasmatidae, morphology, phylogeny, synapomorphy, male genitalia
1. Introduction
Phasmatodea, a rather small order of stick and leaf insects, comprise more than 3000 described extant species which are different from extinct winged groups. Just like their common names, they are remarkable mimics of the stems, twigs and leaves on which they live and feed [1–3]. At present, the classification system of Phasmatodea still remains questionable [4–7]. However, modern Phasmatodea comprise the Timematodea and the remaining Phasmatodea (= Euphasmatodea), which have been confirmed by many phylogenetic studies based on morphological characters or DNA sequence data [8–12].
The stick insects have a fairly poor fossil record [4,13,14], and the taxonomic positions of most fossil taxa remain uncertain because of the lack of informative characters visible or preserved. However, the extinct Susumanioidea Gorochov, 1988 have been interpreted to be true stem-group Phasmatodea and are probably paraphyletic with respect to the Euphasmatodea [13,14]. Nel & Delfosse [15] described Renphasma of Susumaniidae, which has a typical vomer of extant stick insects, supporting the hypothesis that these winged fossil taxa and modern stick insects belong to the same clade, but the exact relationship among these extinct winged and extant wingless and shorter winged stick insects still remains unclear.
Stick insects have been documented in Dominican amber [16–18], Mexican amber [19], Baltic amber [20], Oise amber [21] and Myanmar (Burmese) amber [4,22–24]. Most of these described amber species are wingless. Only two families, Archipseudophasmatidae and Gallophasmatidae, with fully developed wings have been reported from Baltic and Oise amber, respectively. Zompro [20] erected the family Archipseudophasmatidae based on some Eocene Baltic amber and described only two features of wing venation: radius vein branched in tegmina and ‘shoulder’ (same as ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’, a pronounced hump in the area between the radius and media (M) that could be correlated with the presence of a particular folding of the hind wing, described by Nel et al. [21]) of tegmina acute and projecting. Nel et al. [21] described another winged stick insect, Gallophasma longipalpis (Gallophasmatidae), from the earliest Oise amber in France, which has the same wing venation of tegmina as Archaeorthoptera. However, Bradler et al. [25] argued that Gallophasma longipalpis does not belong to the stem lineage of recent Phasmatodea.
Herein, we describe three winged stick insects, which have similar tegmina venation as some Susumanioidea and share some synapomorphies with extant groups, but male genitalia are different from all stick insects previously documented. Therefore, these new species provide morphological evidence for us to clarify the early evolution of Phasmatodea and the relationship among Phasmatodea, Embioptera and Orthoptera.
2. Results
(a). Systematic palaeontology
Order Phasmatodea Jacobson & Bianchi, 1902
Family Pterophasmatidae Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao fam. nov.
Type genus. Pterophasma Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao gen. nov.
Diagnosis. Fully winged in male; tegmina with ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’, without ‘procostal’ area, the branch location of radial posterior (RP) in distal of RP origin or RP unbranched, anal area narrow. Labrum emarginated; antennifer well-defined; antenna longer than profemora, with a prominence on the surface of pedicel base; third antennomere not especially elongate. Pronotum without lateral extension, with a distinctly transverse furrow on anterior part; metasternum and abdominal sternum I fused. Area apicalis present; five-segmented tarsi and with arolia. Abdominal tergum X divided; vomer absent; phallic organ symmetric and with two phallomeres; male with thorn pads in tergum X; cerci unsegmented and bipartite.
Included genera. Pterophasma gen. nov., Leptophasma gen. nov., Meniscophasma gen. nov.
Remarks. Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. are different from Archipseudophasmatidae which have the third antennomere at least twice as long as scapus and pedicellus combined, median segment longer than half length of metanotum and ocelli absent [20]. Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. are also different from Gallophasmatidae which have a pattern of tegmina venation typical of Archaeorthoptera, tegmina without ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’, area apicalis of tibia absent and maxillary palps very elongate (six-segmented) and much longer than head and cerci with four apparent ‘segments’ [21]. Although the tegmina venations of extinct Susumanioidea (e.g. Adjacivena rasnitsyni Shang, Béthoux & Ren, 2011, Hagiphasma paradoxa Ren, 1997, Cretophasmomima melanogramma Wang, Béthoux & Ren, 2014) are similar to those of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. (figure 5), the male genitalia of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. are different from those of Susumanioidea and living groups [13,26–28]. In addition, the phylogenetic analyses (figure 1) suggest that Susumanioidea are non-monophyletic, and Renphasma Nel & Delfosse, 2011 probably is not a genus of Susumanioidea. Furthermore, Gallophasma of Gallophasmatidae has a closer relationship with Orthoptera than with Phasmatodea, and Archipseudophasma of Archipseudophasmatidae has a closer relationship with Susumanioidea. Therefore, the internal relationships of these winged stick insects are still contentious, more well-preserved specimens are needed for future studies.
Figure 5.
Comparisons for line drawings of tegmina venation. (a) Adjacivena rasnitsyni Shang, Béthoux & Ren, 2011. (b) Hagiphasma paradoxa Ren, 1997. (c) Renphasma sinica Nel & Delfosse, 2011. (d) Cretophasmomima melanogramma Wang, Béthoux & Ren, 2014. (e) Leptophasma physematosa gen. et sp. nov. (f) Pterophasma erromera gen. et sp. nov. (g) Meniscophasma erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. (h) Heteropteryx dilatata Parkinson, 1798. AA1, anterior anal vein; Cu, cubitus; CuA, cubital anterior; CuP, cubital posterior; CuPa, anterior branch of CuP; CuPaα, anterior branch of CuPa; CuPaβ, posterior branch of CuPa; CuPb, posterior branch of CuP; M, media; MA, medial anterior; MP, medial posterior; R, radius; RA, radial anterior; RP, radial posterior; ScP, subcostal posterior. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 1.
Phylogeny of Phasmatodea based on morphological characters. The strict consensus tree, tree length = 187 steps, consistency index (CI) = 0.44, retention index (RI) = 0.66. The numbers under the branch nodes are bootstrap support values (data in blue) and the numbers on the branch nodes are Bremer support values (data in purple). The large black dots show the age of the genera, and the branch nodes of this strict consensus tree do not represent any time. Small black dots, unambiguous unique characters; small white dots, homoplasious characters. (Online version in colour.)
Genus Pterophasma Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao gen. nov.
Type species. Pterophasma erromera Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao sp. nov.
Etymology. The new generic name is a combination of the Greek ‘ptero-’ meaning ‘wing’, and ‘phasma’, stem of the ordinal name of Phasmatodea. The name refers to the fully winged stick insects. The gender is feminine.
Diagnosis. Tegmina with RP two branches, CuA + CuPaα (see figure 5 caption for definitions of venation) two distal branches, two anal veins and anal area with cross-veins. Three ocelli present. Metafemur thickened and with a spine at the base of hind tibiae; all area apicalis without spines; all tarsi with euplantulae. Subgenital plate with two large lobes at the terminal; abdominal tergum X with only two teeth on both sides; phallic organ with broad phallomeres and cerci bifurcated in a basal position, one straight and the other curved inward.
Pterophasma erromera Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao sp. nov. (figure 2 and figure 5f)
Figure 2.
Photographs of Pterophasma erromera gen. et sp. nov. (BU-001438) (a) Lateral view as preserved. (b) Line drawing of lateral view. (c) Right antenna, a tubercle on surface of pedicel base (black arrows). (d) The ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’ of tegmina (black arrows). (e) Head in lateral view, three ocelli (white arrows). (f) Male genital photograph in posterior view, thorn pad (white arrows), under green fluorescent protein (GFP) mode. (g) Head in dorsal view, showing labrum (white wireframe). (h) Right metatarsus in lateral view, showing the area apicalis (white arrows) of right metatibia. Scale bars: (a,b,d), 2 mm; (c), 0.1 mm; (e,g–h), 0.5 mm; (f), 0.4 mm. af, antennal field; ar, arolium; ce, cercus; cx, coxa; ep, epiproct; eu, euplantula; fla1, flagellomere I; fm, femur; pa, paraproct; pd, pedicellus; pha, phallomeres; pmx, maxillary palpus; prt, pronotum; sc, scape; ta1–ta5, tarsomeres I–V; tr, trochanter; un, claw. (Online version in colour.)
Etymology. The epithet is from the Latin word ‘erromerus’, referring to the tibia of hind leg which is thick and strong.
Diagnosis. As for the genus.
Holotype. An adult male, no. BU-001438.
Type locality and horizon. The amber specimen was collected from Kachin (Hukawng Valley) of northern Myanmar, which was dated at 98.79 ± 0.62 Ma [29,30].
Description. See the electronic supplementary material, data S1 for a complete description.
Genus Leptophasma Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao gen. nov.
Type species. Leptophasma physematosa Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao sp. nov.
Etymology. The new generic name is a combination of the Greek ‘lepto-’ meaning ‘slender’, and ‘phasma’, stem of the ordinal name of Phasmatodea. The name refers to the slender legs, thorax and abdomen. The gender is feminine.
Diagnosis. Tegmina with radial anterior (RA) subbranch, RP two short branches, CuA + CuPaα two long branches, an anal vein and anal area without cross-veins. Ocelli absent; scape of antenna large and swollen at terminal. Prothorax elongate, length twice the width. All legs slender, profemora slightly curved near base. The terminal part of abdomen not preserved.
Leptophasma physematosa Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao sp. nov. (figure 3 and figure 5e)
Figure 3.
Photographs of Leptophasma physematosa gen. et sp. nov. (CNU-PHA-MA2018005) (a) Dorsal view as preserved. (b) Line drawing of dorsal view. (c) Head in dorsal view, profemora curved (black arrows). (d) Right middle leg, showing area apicalis (black arrows) of right mesotibia. (e) Left protarsus in ventral view. Scale bars: (a–c), 5 mm; (d–e), 0.5 mm. af, antennal field; ar, arolium; cx, coxa; fla1, flagellomere I; fm, femur; pd, pedicellus; pmx, maxillary palpus; prt, pronotum; sc, scape; ta1–ta5, tarsomeres I–V; tb, tibia; tr, trochanter; un, claw. (Online version in colour.)
Etymology. The epithet is from the Latin word ‘physematosus’, referring to the scape of antenna which is swollen.
Diagnosis. As for the genus.
Holotype. An adult male, no. CNU-PHA-MA2018005.
Type locality and horizon. The amber specimen was collected from Kachin (Hukawng Valley) of northern Myanmar, which was dated at 98.79 ± 0.62 Ma [29,30].
Description. See the electronic supplementary material, data S2 for a complete description.
Genus Meniscophasma Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao gen. nov.
Type species. Meniscophasma erythrosticta Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao sp. nov.
Etymology. The new generic name is a combination of the Greek ‘menisco-’, meaning ‘crescent-shaped’, and ‘phasma’, stem of the ordinal name of Phasmatodea. The name refers to the crescent-shaped abdominal tergum X. The gender is feminine.
Diagnosis. Tegmina with RP unbranched, CuA + CuPaα two long branches; one anal vein and anal area without cross-veins. With a protuberance on head; three ocelli present and antenna much longer than profemur but shorter than body. Femora of hind legs apparently slightly curved. Subgenital plate with two small lobes at terminal; abdominal tergum X elongate and crescent-shaped, respectively; phallic organ with elongated phallomeres and cerci bifurcated nearly at the middle.
Meniscophasma erythrosticta Yang, Shih, Ren & Gao sp. nov. (figures 4 and 5g)
Figure 4.
Photographs of Meniscophasma erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. (BU-001967) (a) Dorsal view as preserved. (b) Line drawing of dorsal view. (c) Head in dorsal view, three ocelli (white arrows). (d) Right protarsus in dorsal view. (e) Three-dimensional ecological reconstruction of Meniscophasma erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. (f) Right meso- and metatarsus in lateral view, showing area apicalis (white arrows) of right mesotibia. (g) Right mesofemur, showing red spots (arrows). (h) Right metafemur, showing red spots (arrows). Scale bars: (a,b), 2 mm; (c), 0.5 mm; (d,f–g), 0.2 mm; (h), 0.5 mm. af, antennal field; ar, arolium; cx, coxa; fla1, flagellomere I; fm, femur; pd, pedicellus; plb, labial palpus; pmx, maxillary palpus; prt, pronotum; sc, scape; ta1–ta5, tarsomeres I–V; tb, tibia; tr, trochanter; un, claw. (Online version in colour.)
Etymology. The epithet is from the Latin word ‘erythrostictus’, referring to the regular red spots of all the femora.
Diagnosis. As for the genus.
Holotype. An adult male, no. BU-001967.
Type locality and horizon. The amber specimen was collected from Kachin (Hukawng Valley) of northern Myanmar, which was dated at 98.79 ± 0.62 Ma [29,30].
Description. See the electronic supplementary material, data S3 for a complete description.
(b). Phylogenetic analyses
Our phylogenetic analyses, based on morphological characters, produced a strict consensus tree (figure 1) and two most parsimonious trees (electronic supplementary material, figure S1 using WinClada and electronic supplementary material, figure S2 using TNT). Although the support values (bootstrap and Bremer support, electronic supplementary material, figure S3) are low probably owing to the absence of many detailed features in fossils and wing venation features in extant stick insects, the following unquestionable results can be obtained.
The strict consensus tree (figure 1) indicates the extinct winged Susumanioidea, Archipseudophasmatidae and Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. belong to Phasmatodea, together with Timematodea and Euphasmatodea form the clade Phasmatodea. The monophyly of Phasmatodea is supported by five synapomorphies: ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’ of tegmina present (character 34: 1), cubitus (Cu) of hind wing unbranched or without Cu (character 52: 1), 2–7A of hind wing with a common origin at the wing base (character 55: 1), cerci unsegmented (character 57: 1), males with thorn pads in tergum X (character 69: 1) and a homoplasious character, tarsus with five articles (character 29: 1). Although Timematodea have a trimerous tarsus, it is formed by the first three tarsomeres of the originally five-segmented tarsus fused, so the five-segmented tarsus is a plesiomorphy of Phasmatodea [5,8,9,12].
The monophyly of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. is supported by a synapomorphy and two homoplasious characters: cerci bipartite (character 56: 1), genitalia (phallic organ of abdominal segment IX) symmetric (character 67: 0) and the abdominal tergum X of male split (character 68: 1). Furthermore, Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. share some apomorphies with living groups: labrum emarginated [5,9,31], antennifer well-defined [5,8,9], metasternum and abdominal sternum I fused [5,23–25], male with thorn pads in tergum X [5,14] and cerci unsegmented [5,8,32]. Therefore, Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. is definitely a stem-group of Phasmatodea.
Based on the results of our phylogenetic analyses (figure 1), Phasmatodea are corroborated to have a closer relationship with Embioptera than with Orthoptera, the apomorphies of Phasmatodea with Embioptera are as follows: antennifer well-defined (character 2: 1), prothorax without lateral extension (character 9: 1), trochanter fused with the femur (character 22: 1), media (M) of tegmina with two branches (character 43: 1), the branch location of M in behind of RP origin (character 44: 1), RP of hind wings unbranched (character 49: 1) and M of hind wings with two branches (character 51: 1).
3. Discussion
(a). Phylogenetic position of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov
To date, stick insects from Myanmar (Burmese) amber have been described based on apterous adults and nymphs, and they are all recognized as true stick insects [4,22–24]. Here, we described three winged adults for the first time, Pterophasma erromera gen. et sp. nov., Meniscophasma erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. and Leptophasma physematosa gen. et sp. nov. from the same deposit. They have fully developed wings and a pattern of tegmina venation similar to those of the species of Susumanioidea from the Middle Jurassic to Eocene [28,33], such as the tegmina not abbreviated and slightly shorter than hind wings at rest, without the ‘precostal’ area, proximal origin of RP, M with two branches and Cu with several branches (figure 5). Therefore, these three new genera are much more similar to Susumanioidea than living groups, which is consistent with our phylogenetic analyses (figure 1). However, Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. have well-developed antennifer of their antennae exhibited by Embioptera and Timematodea, which suggests that Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. is a stem-group of Phasmatodea and different from Euphasmatodea with antennifer largely reduced [5,9]. The scape of L. physematosa gen. et sp. nov. is large and swollen at the apex as also found in Timematodea [8]. In addition, labrum emarginated and metasternum fused with the abdominal sternum I are the synapomorphies exhibited by all extant Phasmatodea but absent in Embioptera and most of Orthoptera, which also suggest Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. should be a stem-group of Phasmatodea. Moreover, there are many other body characters present in Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. and some living groups, such as three ocelli, area apicalis, arolia, euplantulae and ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’ of tegmina (figure 2d). All extant male winged Euphasmatodea have a more or less pronounced ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’ in tegmina [21], also present in Archipseudophasmatidae [20] and Cretophasmomima melanogramma Wang, Béthoux and Ren, 2014 (interpreted as ‘shoulder pad’) of Susumanioidea [13]. Therefore, we think that the ‘knob-like dorsal eversion’ of tegmina probably constitutes a synapomorphy of winged stick insects. In summary, we suggest that Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. are the transitional taxa from Susumanioidea to modern Phasmatodea.
(b). Wing evolution in stick insects
Many known groups of Susumanioidea were identified based on wings only, resulting in the questionable systematic position of Susumanioidea. Our phylogenetic results indicate that the supposed ‘Susumanioidea’ group should be assigned to Phasmatodea, though their internal relationship has not been adequately addressed here. Heteropteryx dilatata Parkinson, 1798, as the representative of extant winged stick insects, also have the tegmina not shortened and RP with two branches (figure 5h and the electronic supplementary material, figure S4) [12,21], but tegmina much shorter than hind wings at rest. Based on the tegmina of Adjacivena (the earliest fossil records of Susumanioidea from the Middle Jurassic, figure 5a) having multi-branched RP, which are in contrast to one to three branches in other Susumanioidea, Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. and Heteropteryx dilatata, it is suggested that the RP of tegmina have a tendency to decrease in number of branches within winged stick insects. Furthermore, the anal areas of Adjacivena and Hagiphasma (figure 5a,b) being wider than those of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. (figure 5e–g) and Heteropteryx dilatata (figure 5h) also suggest that the anal areas of tegmina probably gradually shrank in the evolutionary process. All extinct winged stick insects have well-developed tegmina, but the tegmina of extant stick insects are shorter or absent. Although Heteropteryx dilatata has similar venation, the tegmina has a clear shortening trend compared with extinct winged stick insects. There are no documented fossils of stick insects with shorter wings except for Eophyllium Wedmann, Bradler & Rust, 2007 from Eocene [34]. All the known specimens of winged stick insects found before the mid-Cretaceous possessed long tegmina, such as Susumanioidea. Therefore, we suppose that the forewing shortening within stick insects might have occurred between the mid-Cretaceous and Eocene (99 ∼ 47 Ma). However, many wingless stick insects in mid-Cretaceous Myanmar amber have been reported recently, showing a variety of body shapes [4,22,23,24]. Whiting [11] documented that the loss and recovery of wings in stick insects should have happened many times during the course of evolution based on abundant molecular data. In addition, the new findings and the phylogenetic analyses including fossil, extant, winged and wingless stick insects based on morphological features also corroborate that independent transitions from a winged form to winglessness have occurred more than once.
For a long time, the exact phylogenetic relationship of Phasmatodea with other polyneopteran lineages, especially Orthoptera and Embioptera, have always been contentious [4,10,11,24]. Our results of the phylogenetic analyses including some wing venation characters corroborate that Phasmatodea, including fossils, have a closer relationship with Embioptera than with Orthoptera. The closer relationship of Phasmatodea with Embioptera have also been confirmed by many other phylogenetic studies based on morphological characters or DNA sequence data [5,9–11,35,36].
(c). Evolution of the male genitalia within Phasmatodea
In males of living groups, distinctive morphological features mainly concern the abdominal sternum IX (subgenital plate) and the abdominal segment X, especially the venter X is particularly modified with specialized clasping organs involved in copulation [37]. In general, the abdominal subgenital plate of Timema and most Euphasmatodea is transversally divided into an anterior sternite and a posterior sternite (the poculum) and covered the phallic organ (e.g. Sipyloidea amica Bei-Bienko, 1959, figure 6d,h and electronic supplementary material, figure S5) [5,37]. A similar character also occurs in P. erromera gen. et sp. nov. and M. erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. (figure 6a,b,e,f, denoted in blue and purple). The difference is the apical part of the subgenital plate splitting into two lobes (figure 6b,f, denoted in purple) rather than the poculum. We conjecture that these two lobes might have been used to enhance the male's control ability during copulation. Relatively, in most extant stick insects, the vomer is a hook-shaped, sclerotized derivative of the tenth sternum (e.g. Sipyloidea amica Bei-Bienko, 1959, figure 6h) that clasps the posterior margin of female sternum 7 to enhance the male's control [38,39]. Furthermore, the incurved and rather elongated cerci also play an important role in the mating [37]. The male of P. erromera gen. et sp. nov. has a incurved cerci (figures 2f and 6a–c), which is also present in extant and fossil stick insects Renphasma sinica Nel & Delfosse, 2011 [15]. Nevertheless, the tergum X of M. erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. forms a pair of curved claspers behind the cerci (figure 6e–g), the claspers contain a pair of thorn pads (figure 6e,f, arrows), which might be used to enhance the male's control during copulation (similar to most extant Euphasmatodea) [5,40]. The presence of thorn pads on the hind margin of abdominal tergum X is one of the diagnostic characteristics of Euphasmatodea [5], and also present in P. erromera gen. et sp. nov. (figures 2f, 6a,b).
Figure 6.
Male genitalia compared with modern stick insects. (a) Photograph of male genitalia of Pterophasma erromera gen. et sp. nov. in lateral view, thorn pads (black arrows). (b) Line drawing of male genitalia of P. erromera gen. et sp. nov., thorn pads (black arrows). (c) Photograph of male genitalia of P. erromera gen. et sp. nov. in posterior view. (d) Photograph of male genitalia of Sipyloidea amica (Bei-Bienko, 1959) in lateral view, thorn pads (black arrow). (e) Photograph of male genitalia of Meniscophasma erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. in ventral view, thorn pads (black arrows). (f) Line drawing of male genitalia of M. erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov., thorn pads (black arrows). (g) Photograph of male genitalia of M. erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. in dorsal view. (h) Photograph of male genitalia of S. amica (Bei-Bienko, 1959) in ventral view, thorn pads (black arrows). Scale bars: (a–c,e–g), 0.5 mm; (d,h), 1 mm. ce, cercus; ep, epiproct; pa, paraproct; pha, phallomeres; poc, poculum; s7–s9, sternum VII–IX; s9a, the anterior sternite of sternum IX; t7–t10, terga VII–X; vo, vomer. (Online version in colour.)
The male genital structures of stick insects frequently show greater divergence than female structures [41,42]. In many groups of Polyneoptera, the true male genitalia (phallic organs of abdominal segment IX) have highly complicated structures. In some Plecoptera, Blattaria, Mantodea, Phasmatodea and Orthoptera, the primary phallic organ comprises two to nine phallomeres located around the ejaculatory duct opening [43]. The male phallic organ of Grylloblatta (Grylloblattidae, Notoptera) comprises essentially two phallomeres, with the gonopore between them, or on the base of the right one [38]. Similarly, P. erromera gen. et sp. nov. and M. erythrosticta gen. et sp. nov. have symmetric phallic organs that contain two consistent phallomeres (figure 6a,b,e,f, denoted in yellow); however, the phallic organs of living groups are asymmetric. In Embioptera, the phallic organs are usually absent or little-developed. In Dictyoptera, Grylloblattodea and Mantophasmatodea, the phallic organs are also asymmetric and distinctly different between the left and right parts. Orthoptera usually have very complicated but symmetric phallic organs (though minor asymmetries may occur) [44]. It is supposed that a symmetric phallic organ might be a plesiomorphy for Phasmatodea.
(d). Diversified evolution of stick insects in the Cretaceous
Stick insects already have a broad diversity of morphological characters in mid-Cretaceous Myanmar amber (shown in figure 1), for example, winged Pterophasmatidae fam. nov., robust and compressed Echinosomiscus primoticus Engel, Wang & Alqarni, 2016 bearing abundant acanthae over the body [4], Elasmophasma stictum Chen, Yin, Shih & Ren, 2018 with well-preserved, thin, lateral lamellae on the thorax, the terga of abdomen and the ventrolateral margins of all femora [23], Pseudoperla leptoclada Chen, Zhang, Shih & Ren, 2017 with antenna slender and long [22], robust Tumefactipes prolongates Chen, Shih, Ren & Gao, 2018 and Granosicorpes lirates Chen, Shih, Ren & Gao, 2018 similar to Timema [24]. These specimens provide a minimal age for the origin and diversification of Timematidae and Euphasmatodea, and indicate the differentiation of winged and wingless stick insects occurred during or before the mid-Cretaceous. Therefore, the mid-Cretaceous is an important period of radiation and evolution for stick insects, which might be related to the extensive radiation of angiospermous diversity during this period [45].
4. Material and methods
(a). Specimens imaging and terminology
All amber type specimens described here are housed in the Key Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China (CNUB; Dong Ren, Curator). However, BU-001438 and BU-001967 will eventually be deposited in the Three Gorges Entomological Museum, Chongqing (specimens to be available for study by contacting D.R. or W.W.Z.).
The amber specimens were examined under a Leica M205C dissecting microscope. All yellow and white background photographs were taken with a Nikon SMZ 25 microscope with an attached Nikon DS-Ri2 digital camera system and a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni microscope with an attached Nikon DS-Ri2 digital camera system. The green background photograph was taken with the Zeiss ApoTome.2 with an AXIO Zoom.V16 digital camera system under green fluorescent protein (GFP) mode. Line drawings were prepared by using Adobe Illustrator CC and Adobe Photoshop CC graphics software.
The wing venation nomenclature follows Wang et al. [13]. The following abbreviations have been used throughout: AA1, anterior anal vein; Cu, cubitus; CuA, cubital anterior; CuP, cubital posterior; CuPa, anterior branch of CuP; CuPaα, anterior branch of CuPa; CuPaβ, posterior branch of CuPa; CuPb, posterior branch of CuP; M, media; MA, medial anterior; MP, medial posterior; R, radius; RA, radial anterior; RP, radial posterior; ScP, subcostal posterior.
(b). Phylogenetic analyses
We carried out phylogenetic analyses by using morphological characters to confirm the taxonomic position of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. and to clarify phylogenetic relationships among Susumanioidea, Pterophasmatidae fam. nov., Timematodea and Euphasmatodea. Seventeen extant genera and 16 fossil genera are used in this analysis. For most extant genera, we chose the type genera as representatives, such as Aschiphasma Westwood, 1834, and for those groups without well-preserved type genera, we chose other representative genera instead, but all extant genera are attributable to Bradler's study in 2009 [5]. We added 13 fossil genera (Renphasma Nel & Delfosse, 2011 [15]; Hagiphasma Ren, 1997 [27]; Adjacivena Shang, Béthoux & Ren, 2011 [26]; Cretophasmomima Kuzmina, 1985 [13]; Archipseudophasma Zompro, 2001 [20]; Gallophasma Nel, Delfosse & Robillard, 2010 [21]; Tumefactipes Chen, Shih, Ren & Gao, 2018 [24]; Granosicorpes Chen, Shih, Ren & Gao, 2018 [24]; Pseudoperla Berendt & Pictet, 1854 [22]; Clonistria Stal, 1875 [17]; Elasmophasma Chen, Yin, Shih & Ren, 2018 [23]; Eophyllium Wedmann, Bradler & Rust, 2007 [34]; Echinosomiscus Engel, Wang & Alqarni, 2016 [4]) which have a relatively complete body, and three new genera of Pterophasmatidae fam. nov. (Pterophasma gen. nov., Meniscophasma gen. nov. and Leptophasma gen. nov.). To sum up, the phylogenetic analyses include 33 taxa with 30 ingroups and three outgroups of Nemoura Latreille, 1796 (Plecoptera), Tettigonia Linnaeus, 1758 (Ensifera), and Embioptera spec. indet., based on the study of Bradler, 2009 [5]. Meanwhile, we made some changes of the character states to enhance our analyses, most of the body characters are attributable to Bradler's study in 2009 and added some wing venation characters. A total of 73 morphological characters are shown in the electronic supplementary material, table S1, some are clearly present in three new genera, and others are important features of representative ingroups. The character-state matrix consisting of 33 taxa and 73 morphological characters is shown in the electronic supplementary material, table S2.
Parsimony analyses were performed by using WinClada (version 1.00.08) [46] and NONA (version 2.0) [47]. Tree search implemented a heuristic search method and the options were set to hold 10 000 trees, 1000 replications, 100 starting tree replications and a multiple TBR + TBR search strategy. All characters were considered unordered and weighted equally. Bootstrap supporting values were determined by using NONA with 1000 replications and are represented as numbers under the branch nodes (figure 1 and electronic supplementary material, figure S3a, data in blue). An analysis was run again in TNT (version 1.5) [48] with traditional search and the minimum length was set to be found 1000 times, an identical strict consensus tree was obtained. Bremer supporting values were calculated through the script ‘bremer.run’ of the program and are represented as numbers above the branch nodes (figure 1 and electronic supplementary material, figure S3b, data in purple).
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Sven Bradler (Georg-August-University Göttingen) for guidance and advice regarding morphological analysis of the male genitalia. We thank the Editorial Board of Proceedings B, and in particular, Dr Victoria Braithwaite. We express our gratitude to three anonymous reviewers for their critical but valuable reviews of the manuscript. We are grateful to Dr Yongjie Wang and Sha Chen (Capital Normal University) for providing helpful comments and discussions. We are grateful to Yun Chen for providing the extant specimen (Heteropteryx dilatata Parkinson, 1798). We appreciate Qingqing Lin, Zhipeng Zhao, Lifang Xiao, Yimo Wang and He Tian (Capital Normal University) for their helpful advice.
Data accessibility
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article, and electronic supplementary material, figures S1–S5, description of three species, primary data of phylogenetic analyses, character matrix in nexus format is available in the electronic supplementary material.
Authors' contributions
T.P.G. and D.R. conceived and designed the experiments; H.R.Y., X.C.Y., X.D.L., C.W., C.K.S., W.W.Z., D.R. and T.P.G. performed the analyses and experiments; H.R.Y. prepared photographs and line drawings; C.W. prepared the three-dimensional ecological reconstruction artwork. H.R.Y., X.D.L., C.K.S., D.R. and T.P.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
D.R. was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos 31730087 and 41688103), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT-17R75) and Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the Period of 13th Five-year Plan (no. IDHT20180518). T.P.G. was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872277) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (no. 5182004).
References
- 1.Bragg PE. 1995. The phasmid database version 1.5. Phasmid Stud. 3, 41–42. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brock PD, Hasenpusch JW. 2009. Complete field guide to stick and leaf insects of Australia. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Robertson JA, Bradler S, Whiting MF. 2018. Evolution of oviposition techniques in stick and leaf insects (Phasmatodea). Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 216 ( 10.3389/fevo.2018.00216) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Engel MS, Wang B, Alqarni AS. 2016. A thorny, ‘anareolate’ stick-insect (Phasmatidae s.l.) in Upper Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, with remarks on diversification times among Phasmatodea. Cretac. Res. 63, 45–53. ( 10.1016/j.cretres.2016.02.015) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bradler S. 2009. Phylogenie der Stab- und Gespenstschrecken (Phasmatodea) [Phylogeny of the stick and leaf insects (Phasmatodea)]. Species Phyl. Evol. 2, 3–139. ( 10.17875/gup2009-710) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bradler S, Robertson JA, Whiting MF. 2014. A molecular phylogeny of Phasmatodea with emphasis on Necrosciinae, the most species-rich subfamily of stick insects. Syst. Entomol. 39, 205–222. ( 10.1111/syen.12055) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buckley TR, Attanayake D, Bradler S. 2009. Extreme convergence in stick insect evolution: phylogenetic placement of the Lord Howe Island tree lobster. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1055–1062. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.1552) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tilgner EH, Kiselyova TG, Mchugh JV. 1999. A morphological study of Timema cristinae Vickery with implications for the phylogenetics of Phasmida. Dtsch Entomol. Z. 46, 149–162. ( 10.1002/mmnd.19990460203) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tilgner EH. 2002. Systematics of Phasmida. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wheeler WC, Whiting M, Wheeler QD, Carpenter JM. 2001. The phylogeny of the extant hexapod orders. Cladistics 17, 113–169. ( 10.1006/clad.2000.0147) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Whiting MF, Bradler S, Maxwell T. 2003. Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature 421, 264–267. ( 10.1038/nature01313) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bradler S, Whiting MF, Klug R. 2003. Basal diversification and the evolution of wings within stick insects (Phasmatodea). Entomol. Abh. 61, 132–133. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang MM, Béthoux O, Bradler S, Jacques FMB, Cui YY, Ren D. 2014. Under cover at pre-angiosperm times: a cloaked phasmatodean insect from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota. PLoS ONE 9, e91290 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0091290) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bradler S, Buckley TR. 2018. Biodiversity of Phasmatodea. Insect Biodivers. Sci. Soc. 2, 281–313. ( 10.1002/9781118945582.ch11) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nel A, Delfosse E. 2011. A new Chinese Mesozoic stick insect. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 56, 429–432. ( 10.4202/app.2009.1108) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Poinar G., Jr 1992. Life in amber, p. 350 Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Poinar G., Jr 2011. A walking stick, Clonistria dominicana n. sp. (Phasmatodea: Diapheromeridae) in Dominican amber. Hist. Biol. 23, 223–226. ( 10.1080/08912963.2010.522405) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tilgner EH. 2000. The fossil record of Phasmida (Insecta: Neoptera). Insect Syst. Evol. 31, 473–480. ( 10.1163/187631200X00507) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Solórzano KMM. 2010. Mexican amber. In Biodiversity of fossils in amber from the major world deposits (ed. Penney D.), pp. 42–56. Manchester, UK: Siri Scientific Press. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zompro O. 2001. The Phasmatodea and Raptophasma n. gen. Orthoptera incertae sedis, in Baltic amber (Insecta: Orthoptera). Mitt. Geol-Pal. Inst. Hamburg. 85, 229–261. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nel A, Delfosse E, Robillard T. 2010. An early winged crown group stick insect from the Early Eocene amber of France (Insecta, Phasmatodea). Syst. Entomol. 35, 340–346. ( 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00515.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen S, Zhang WW, Shih CK, Ren D. 2017. Two new species of Archipseudophasmatidae (Insecta: Phasmatodea) from Upper Cretaceous Myanmar amber. Cretac. Res. 73, 65–70. ( 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.01.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen S, Yin XC, Lin XD, Shih CK, Zhang RZ, Gao TP, Ren D. 2018. Stick insect in Burmese amber reveals an early evolution of lateral lamellae in the Mesozoic. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180425 ( 10.1098/rspb.2018.0425) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen S, Deng SW, Shih CK, Zhang WW, Zhang P, Ren D, Zhu YN, Gao TP. 2018. The earliest Timematids in Burmese amber reveal diverse tarsal pads of stick insects in the mid-Cretaceous. Insect Sci. 26, 945–957. ( 10.1111/1744-7917.12601) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bradler S, Buckley TR. 2011. Stick insect on unsafe ground: does a fossil from the early Eocene of France really link Mesozoic taxa with the extant crown group of Phasmatodea? Syst. Entomol. 36, 218–222. ( 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00564.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shang LJ, Béthoux O, Ren D. 2011. New stem-Phasmatodea from the Middle Jurassic of China. Eur. J. Entomol. 108, 677–685. ( 10.14411/eje.2011.086) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ren D. 1997. First record of fossil stick-insects from China with analyses of some paleobiological features (Phasmatodea: Hagiphasmatidae fam. nov.). Acta Zootaxon. Sin. 22, 268–282 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gorochov AV. 2000. Phasmomimidae: are they Orthoptera or Phasmatoptera? Paleontol. J. 34, 295–300. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cruickshank RD, Ko K. 2003. Geology of an amber locality in the Hukawng Valley, northern Myanmar. J. Asian Earth Sci. 21, 441–455. ( 10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00044-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shi GH, Grimaldi DA, Harlow GE, Wang J, Wang J, Yang MC, Lei WY, Li QL, Li XH. 2012. Age constraint on Burmese amber based on U-Pb dating of zircons. Cretac Res. 37, 155–163. ( 10.1016/j.cretres.2012.03.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gottardo M, Vallotto D. 2014. External macro-and micromorphology of the male of the stick insect Hermarchus leytensis (Insecta: Phasmatodea) with phylogenetic considerations. C. R. Biol. 337, 258–268. ( 10.1016/j.crvi.2014.02.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grimaldi D, Engel MS. 2005. Evolution of the insects. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Archibald SB, Bradler S. 2015. Stem-group stick insects (Phasmatodea) in the early Eocene at McAbee, British Columbia, Canada, and Republic, Washington, United States of America. Can. Entomol. 147, 744–753. ( 10.4039/tce.2015.2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wedmann S, Bradler S, Rust J. 2007. The first fossil leaf insect: 47 million years of specialized cryptic morphology and behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 565–569. ( 10.1073/pnas.0606937104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Friedemann K, Wipfler B, Bradler S, Beutel RG. 2012. On the head morphology of Phyllium and the phylogenetic relationships of Phasmatodea (Insecta). Acta Zool. 93, 184–199. ( 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00497.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wipfler B, et al. 2019. Evolutionary history of Polyneoptera and its implications for our understanding of early winged insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1–6. ( 10.1073/pnas.1817794116) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vallotto D, Bresseel J, Constant J, Gottardo M. 2016. Morphology of the terminalia of the stick insect Dajaca napolovi from Vietnam (Insecta: Phasmatodea). Entomol. Sci. 19, 376–382. ( 10.1111/ens.12209) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Snodgrass RE. 1937. The male genitalia of Orthopteroid insects. Smithsonian Misc. Collect. 96, 1–107. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bradler S. 1999. The vomer of Timema Scudder, 1895 (Insecta: Phasmatodea) and its significance for phasmatodean phylogeny. Courier Forschungs-Inst Senckenberg 215, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Myers SS, Buckley TR, Holwell GI. 2016. Male genital claspers influence female mate acceptance in the stick insect Clitarchus hookeri. Behavior. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 1547–1556. ( 10.1007/s00265-016-2163-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eberhard WG. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ah-King M, Barron AB, Herberstein ME. 2014. Genital evolution: why are females still understudied? PLoS Biol. 12, e1001851 ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001851) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Matsuda R. 1976. Morphology and evolution of the insect abdomen. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Helm C, Treulieb S, Werler K, Bradler S, Klass KD. 2011. The male genitalia of Oxyartes lamellatus – phasmatodeans do have complex phallic organs (Insecta: Phasmatodea). Zool. Anz. 250, 223–245. ( 10.1016/j.jcz.2011.04.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Peris D, Pérezde LFR, Peñalver E, Delclòs X, Barrón E, Labandeira CC. 2017. False blister beetles and the expansion of gymnosperm-insect pollination modes before angiosperm dominance. Curr. Biol. 27, 897–904. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nixon KC. 2002. Winclada, version 1.00.08. Program and documentation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Goloboff PA. 1997. Noname (NONA), version 2.0. Program and documentation. Tucumán, Argentina: Fundación Instituto Miguel Lillo. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Goloboff PA, Catalano SA. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics. 32, 221–238. ( 10.1111/cla.12160) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article, and electronic supplementary material, figures S1–S5, description of three species, primary data of phylogenetic analyses, character matrix in nexus format is available in the electronic supplementary material.






