Skip to main content
Archives of Neuropsychiatry logoLink to Archives of Neuropsychiatry
. 2019 Jul 16;56(3):186–190. doi: 10.29399/npa.23505

HBsAg, Anti-HCV and Anti-HIV Seroprevalance Among Drug Users: a Retrospective Assessment

Imre Altuğlu 1,, Selin Tanyeri 2, Ayşın Zeytinoğlu 1, Ayşe Ender Altintoprak 2
PMCID: PMC6732810  PMID: 31523144

Abstract

Introduction:

Drug abuse and co-occurring infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In regions with high rates of drug usage, infections like hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are highly prevalent. Epidemiological studies on HBV, HCV and HIV infections among users of illicit drugs are scarce in Turkey. The primary aim of this cross-sectional and retrospective study was to determine the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and anti-HIV antibody (anti-HIV) seroprevalences in drug users who applied to a psychiatric outpatient clinic of drug addiction of a university hospital. Secondarily, the assessment of HBsAg, anti-HCV and anti-HIV parameters among intravenous drug users was aimed.

Methods:

Serum samples of all patients on probation who applied to a psychiatric outpatient clinic of drug addiction of a university hospital between 2013–2017 and sent to the department of medical microbiology for routine serologic testing were included in the study. The serologic results were obtained retrospectively from laboratory records. For the statistical analysis of the data IBM SPSS 20.0 program was used.

Results:

Among the studied individuals, the ELISA results demonstrated the existence of HBsAg, anti-HCV and anti-HIV in 94 out of 4357 patients (2.2%), 27 out of 4451 patients (0.6%) and 10 (0.2%) out of 4464 patients, respectively. According to the records, 17 of the patients reported intravenous drug usage. Among this patient group, three patients were found to be anti-HCV positive and one patient was found to be anti-HIV positive.

Conclusion:

In our study, the prevalence of HCV and HIV was increased in patients with intravenous drug usage, whereas in non-intravenous drug users the prevalence is similar to the normal population. In order to plan prevention and harm reduction services for this high-risk population, more national data is needed on HBV, HCV and HIV rates among this group.

Keywords: Drug abuse, intravenous, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV

INTRODUCTION

Drug usage and addiction is one of the major health problems with serious negative outcomes. According to the data from World Health Organization (WHO); one of each 20 adults or 250 million people between ages 15-64 worldwide have at least one drug usage history and approximately 12 million people use drugs intravenously (1). Drug usage in Turkey appears to be a serious problem which should be addressed with its medical outcomes. Considering the results of “Research on Attitude and Behaviour Towards Tobacco, Alcohol and Drug Usage in the General Population of Turkey” in 2011 which is conducted by TUBIM for the first time in national population, the prevalence of at least one drug usage once including marijuana between ages 15-65 is 2.7% while between ages 15-16 it is 1.5% (2). According to the 2018 National Drug Report of Turkey, the drugs which are detected nationwide can be aligned in decreasing order according to the amount and number of people arrested with the drug as marijuana, synthetic cannabinoids, heroin, metamphetamine and ecstasy (3).

Drug usage is considered an important risk factor for the contamination of some infectious diseases and it increases the global burden of these infections. Especially the prevalence of blood-borne viral infectious diseases is higher among intravenous drug users compared to the general population (4,5). WHO estimates a prevalence of 14% for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), 52% for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and 9% for Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infections among intravenous drug users in 2014 (1). In addition to the high prevalence among intravenous drug users, there are some studies showing increased prevalence of HCV and HBV infections among non-intravenous drug users (6,7,8,9).

In the countries where illegal drug usage is common, it’s obligatory to take legal precautions because of the increasing rate of both individual and social problems of drug addicts. In this context, drug addicts who use, sell, produce drugs; act criminal while under the effect of drugs or while supplying drugs are scheduled in probation and connectedly, obligatory treatment. The main idea of this application is that community based treatment sanctions would be more effective than imprisonment for drug addiction and the ones who are punished would adapt easier to the society with this kind of programmes of protection (10).

Probation Application which is applied as an important step about the concept of punishment and security precautions, was initiated by the government of Turkey on July 20 2005 issued by the number 25881 of the National Newspaper through the research on criminology and progression in scientific methodology (11). According to the “Treatment of Cases on Probation” notice which was released on 22 December 2009 by the Ministry of Health, probation cases are directed to the state hospitals which employ psychiatrists and psychologists. A urine test once in every two weeks for three times, a clinical assessment for addiction and at least three months of follow up by a psychiatrist and an educational programme for probation with a duration of six weeks by a psychologist are implemented for the cases on probation. By the end of the follow up, a report is drawn up for each case and delivered to the probation offices. Ege University School of Medicine Psychiatry Department Outpatient Clinic of Addiction is tasked with being a center for probation follow-up and continues the surveillance of the cases.

In the initial psychiatric interview of the cases during the probation process, infectious comorbidities related to drug abuse are screened via routine laboratory tests of serologic markers. With this routine application, both the assessment of the prevalence of the infectious comorbidites among drug users and the recommendation and implementation of preventive care as a public health service is aimed.

Although studies on prevention of drug addiction are being conducted, epidemiological studies about infectious diseases among drug users are scarce in Turkey. In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C antibody (Anti-HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus antibody (Anti-HIV) among cases on probation who applied to Ege University School of Medicine Psychiatry Department Outpatient Clinic for Addiction with a history of drug usage and routine screening for infectious markers, was targeted.

METHOD

Study Sample

In this study, the records of psychiatric interview of 4483 cases on probation who applied to Ege University School of Medicine Psychiatry Department Outpatient Clinic for Addiction between January 2013 and December 2017 were investigated, drug usage data and drug usage methods of these cases were recorded.

Material and Application

Clinical data were assessed in accordance with the test results of viral parameters of probation cases which were sent to the serology laboratory retrospectively. From the serum samples, HBsAg was examined in 4357 cases aging between 14-71 (mean+SD 30±9), anti-HCV was examined in 4451 cases aging between 17-74 (mean+SD 30.01±9) and anti-HIV was examined in 4464 cases aging between 17-74 (mean+SD 29.9±9). Peripheral serum samples were analyzed by Architect i20000SR (Abbott, USA) using Architect HBsAg Qualitative Reactive Kit for HBsAg, Architect Ag/Ab Combo Reactive Kit for anti-HIV and Architect Anti-HCV Reactive Kit for anti-HCV. Positive samples for anti-HIV were verified by Anti-HIV Line Immunoassay Test (INNO-LIA™ HIV I/II Score Fujirebio).

Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Version 20.0 was used during the data analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.001.

Ethical Issues

For the execution of this research, an approval from the local Ethics Committee of Ege University School of Medicine was obtained.

RESULTS

Among all the cases included in the study, 94 (2.2%) out of 4357 cases were HBsAg positive, 27 (0.6%) out of 4451 cases were anti-HCV positive and 10 (0.2%) out of 4464 cases were anti-HIV positive (Table 1). 10 cases which were positive for anti-HIV enzyme immunoassay were verified as HIV-1 by HIV line immunoassay. 17 cases were detected as positive for the history of intravenous drug usage from the medical records of the psychiatric interviews. The ages of these cases were between 21-40 (mean+ SD29.84±5.7) and all of these cases were male. Three out of 17 cases were detected positive for anti-HCV (17.6%) and one was detected positive for anti-HIV (5.8%). No positivity was detected for HBsAg.

Table 1.

HBsAg, Anti HIV-1/2, Anti-HCV Results in the studied population

HBsAg (%) Anti-HCV (%) Anti-HIV (%)
Positive 4263 (97.8) 4423 (99.4) 4454 (99.8)
Negative 94 (2.2) 27 (0.6) 10 (0.2)
Total 4357 4451 4464

HBsAg, Hepatitis B surface antigen; Anti-HCV, Hepatitis C antibody; Anti-HIV, HIV antibody.

The cases were categorized in six groups according to age (17-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, 41-45, 46≤). Seropositivity distribution by age was summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Distribution of Infectious markers by age

HBsAg (%) Anti-HCV (%) Anti-HIV (%)
Age groups Negative Positive Total Negative Positive Total Negative Positive Total
17–25 1650 (98.5) 25 (1.5) 1675 1704 (99.5) 8 (0.5) 1712 1720 (99.9) 2 (0.1) 1722
26–30 1038 (98.3) 18 (1.7) 1056 1070 (99.5) 5 (0.5) 1075 1071 (99.6) 4 (0.4) 1075
31–35 671 (97.5) 17 (2.5) 688 704 (99.7) 2 (0.3) 706 709  - 709
36–41 416 (97.9) 9 (2.1) 425 432 (99.3) 3 (0.7) 435 433 (99.5) 2 (0.5) 435
41–45 208 (95.4) 10 (4.6) 218 215 (98.2) 4 (1.8) 219 219 (99.5) 1 (0.5) 220
46≤ 280 (94.9) 15 (5.1) 295 300 (98.7) 4 (1.3) 304 302 (99.7) 1 (0.3) 303
Toplam 4263 (97.8) 94 (2.2) 4357 4425 (99.4) 26 (0.6) 4451 4454 10 (0.2) 4464

HBsAg, Hepatitis B surface antigen; Anti-HCV, Hepatitis C antibody; Anti-HIV, HIV antibody.

HBsAg positivity significantly increased by age (p<0.001). Due to the limited numbers of anti-HCV and anti-HIV positive cases, age-related statistical analysis could not be performed. Similarly, due to the limited numbers of the cases with a history of intravenous drug usage, statictical analysis for the comparison of intravenous drug users and non-intravenous drug users for anti-HCV and anti-HIV positivities could not be performed.

DISCUSSION

Drug usage and the concomitant infections are important for morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that in European Union, over 93 millions of adults or one quarter of the population aging between 15-64 had tried illegal drugs at one point in their lifetime. Drug usage is reported higher for men (56.8 million) than women (36.8 million) (12). In regions where drug addiction prevalence is high, viral infections such as HIV and HCV are more prevalent. Most of the infections detected among drug users are blood-borne viral infections transmitted during intravenous drug usage by unsafe injections. It is recorded that most of the new HCV infections worldwide are due to drug use, mainly by intravenous route. Each year 60 percent of new HCV infections are detected among cases who use drugs intravenously (13, 14). Many studies on intravenous drug users, HBV and HIV prevalences are recorded higher compared to the general population (8).

Although there are programmes for the prevention of drug addiction in Turkey, studies investigating infectious diseases transmitted with drug usage are limited. In 2012, 1821 out of 2007 cases of intravenous drug users who received inpatient treatment in Turkey were assessed for markers of viral hepatitis. Nine hundred twelve (50.1%) of them were anti-HCV positive and 156 (8.57%) were HBsAg positive. In addition, according to the data of Turkish Public Health Organization, 170 anti-HIV positive cases out of 6215 which were reported between 1985-2012 were intravenous drug users. Mode of transmission in six of 1068 new HIV cases detected in 2012 was reported as intravenous drug usage (2).

In a study conducted in Turkey in 1993, HBsAg and anti-HCV prevalences among drug users were found to be 7.3% and 54.8%, respectively (15). In another study from Van, Turkey with a small sized sample of non-intravenous drug users between 2010-2011; one (1.8%) out of 55 cases was found to be positive for HBsAg and one (1.9%) out of 53 cases was found to be anti-HCV positive while there were no positive cases for anti-HIV (16). In another study conducted in Elazığ, Turkey, 235 cases of drug users were assessed and among these cases 2.6% were positive for HBsAg, 9.4% were positive for anti-HCV and there were no anti-HIV positive cases (17). In our study, most of the cases were non-intravenous drug users and 94 (2.2%) out of 4357 were HBsAg, 27 (0.6%) cases out of 4451 were anti-HCV and 10 (0.2%) out of 4464 were anti-HIV positive.

In a review which analyzed 129 studies about seroprevalences in general population in Turkey between 1999-2009; HBsAg positivity in general population was reported as 4.57% (18). Another population based epidemiologic study in 2015 HBsAg positivity rate was 4%. Other studies reported that, in general population, HBsAg positivity had decreased from 4-5% to 2% in Turkey recently (19,20). Results of our study have indicated that HBsAg seroprevalence among drug users is not different than the general population. This finding may be due to increase in HBV vaccination rates and low number of intravenous drug users in the study group. Still, the significant increase by age may be the indicator for the unvaccinated population being at risk.

HCV infection is common in Europe among drug-injecting population, therefore this population is presented as a target group for the HCV testing and treatment in order to prevent the progression of the liver disease (12). There are also studies which demonstrate higher prevalences of HCV infection among non-intravenous drug users compared to the general population (21, 22). The equipment being used during the preparation of the drug as well as the HCV presence in the nasal secretions are considered to be the mode of transmission for HCV (23). In three other Turkish studies, anti-HCV positivity rates were found to be 1.9% (among non-intravenous drug users), 9.4% (1.8% among cannabis users, 15.7% among opiate users) and 54.8% (among intravenous drug users) respectively. On the other hand, in our study, seroprevalence of anti-HCV was found as 0.6% which is not different from the seroprevalence rates in the general population that ranges between 0.4-1.5% (20, 24, 25, 26) but when the limited number of intravenous drug users were considered (n=17), the rate of anti-HCV increases to 17.6%.

In Turkey, cases of HIV/AIDS infection have been reported since 1985. In a research which was conducted in five cities in 2007 within high risk groups (Research on the Services Related to Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV in Turkey), the HIV prevalences among illegal sex workers, men who have sex with men and intravenous drug users were found to be 0.8%, 3.5% and 1.2% respectively (27). According to the data of the Ministry of Health, Public Health General Directorate, Infectious Diseases Department; there were a total number of 17884 cases (16201 cases positive for HIV and 1651 cases of AIDS) reported since the detection of the first case in 1985 until 31 December 2017 (28). There are many studies showing the increasing risk of HIV among intravenous drug users. Intravenous drug usage is being held responsable for 10% of the HIV cases and this rate goes up to 30% in Africa (29). In countries like Greece, Bulgaria and Iran which are neighbours of Turkey, anti-HIV positivity among intravenous drug users are found to be 20.4%, 8.9% and 18.4% respectively (30,31,32). In our study, ten anti-HIV positivite samples were detected in the total number of 4464 cases being mostly non-intravenous drug users. Anti-HIV positivity was detected in one of the 17 cases using drugs by intravenous route. Due to the highly risky behaviours such as unprotected sexual intercourse and multiple sexual partners, a high prevalence of HIV is being reported among non-intravenous drug users (33,34).

Intravenous drug users are under risk of infectious diseases, especially like HBV, HCV and HIV. Some of the studies indicate that among non-intravenous drug users, the prevalence for these infections also increases. Besides, drug users are considered to be sources for these infections. Compared to similar studies, the presented study has quite a larger sample size. The prevalences of these infections were not significantly different from the general population. Still a careful follow-up of this group and attaining national data by investigating the rates in different regions are essential for developing preventive programmes. The effective treatment of HCV infection by new generation antiviral agents in this group might be beneficial for reducing the number of cases which could transmit the infection. European clinical guidelines recommend the assessment of all cases with chronic liver disease due to HCV infection for treatment. Likewise treatment of the cases infected with HIV with highly active retroviral agents, risk counselling about infectious diseases, supplying HBV vaccination for those who are seronegative for hepatitis B are main approaches for the reduction of infections in this population.

In our study HBV, HCV and HIV prevalences among drug users assessed as part of probation application were similar to the general population. This finding is important to underline the significance of followup and close monitoring of serologic comorbidities for early guiding towards treatment and taking protective precautions in this group especially when the lifestyles and risky behaviour under the effect of drugs are considered. The increased prevalences of HCV and HIV among intravenous drug users are open to discussion about causality since there is only a correlation, considering the study design. The main limitation of this research is the possible data loss about the drug usage methods and risky behaviours of the cases which weren’t noted in the case files. Bearing in mind that there is no possible causality methodologically, assuming the possibly increased intravenous drug usage prevalence, the rise of seroprevalences of infections might be higher.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Ege University.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author contributions: Concept – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Design – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Supervision – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Resource – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Materials – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Data Collection &/or Processing – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Analysis&/or Interpretation – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Literature Search – İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Writing Manuscript– İA, ST, AZ, AEA; Critical Review – İA, ST, AZ, AEA.

Conflict of Interest: There is no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure: No financial support was received for the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bussink C, Carpentier C, Davalos LM, Davis P, Duran-Martinez A, Eichinger N, Flanders J, Korenblik A, Laenen FV, Lemohieu JL, Levissianos S, Macdonald D, Me A, Niaz K, Pietschmann T, Raithelhuber M, Saloga CW, Tettey J, Vella A. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report. New York. 2016, Report No:E 16. XI.7 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ay B, Toklu MK, Sarıkamıılı M, Deniz F Türkiye Uyuıturucu ve Uyuıturucu Bağımlılığıİzleme Merkezi, Türkiye Uyuşturucu Raporu. 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Türkiye Uyuşturucu Raporu Ankara. 2018:16–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Camoni L, Regine V, Salfa MC, Nicoletti G, Canuzzi P, Magliocchetti N, Rezza G, Suligoi B. Continued high prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among injecting and noninjecting drug users in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010;46:59–65. doi: 10.4415/ANN_10_01_08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu J, Huang J, Xu D, Lu C, Deng X, Zhou X. Infection status and risk factors of HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis among drug users in Guangdong, China—a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:657. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oliveira-Filho AB, Sawada L, Pinto LC, Locks D, Bahia SL, Brasil-Costa I, Lemos JA. HCV infection among cocaine users in the state of Para, Brazilian Amazon. Arch Virol. 2013;158:1555–1560. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1627-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Armstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virüs infection in the United States 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:705–714. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferreira RC, Rodrigues FP, Teles SA, Lopes CL, Motta-Castro AR, Novais AC, Souto FJ, Martins RM. Prevalence of hepatitis B virüs and risk factors in Brazilian non-injecting drug users. J Med Virol. 2009;81:602–609. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tortu S, Neaigus A, McMahon J, Hagen D. Hepatitis C among noninjecting drug users:a report. Subst Use Misuse. 2001;36:523–534. doi: 10.1081/ja-100102640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bean P. Drug Treatment Courts, British style:the drug treatment court movement in Britain. Subst Use Misuse. 2002;37:1595–1614. doi: 10.1081/ja-120014423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Akgür SA. Şencan I, editor. Madde Kullanım Bozukluklarında Toksikolojik Analizler. Madde BağımlılığıTanıve Tedavi Kılavuzu El Kitabı. T. C. Sağlık BakanlığıYayın No: 879. 2012:57–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.D'Arrigo L, Goosdeel A. Avrupa Uyuşturucu ve Uyuşturucu Bağımlılığınıİzleme Merkezi. Lüksemburg: Avrupa Uyuşturucu Raporu:trendler ve gelişmeler, Avrupa TopluluklarıResmi Yayınlar Bürosu; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2436–2441. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i17.2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amon JJ, Garfein RS, Ahdieh-Grant L, Armstrong GL, Ouellet LJ, Latka MH, Vlahov D, Strathdee SA, Hudson SM, Kerndt P, Des Jarlais D, Williams IT. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users in the United States 1994–2004. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1852–1858. doi: 10.1086/588297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yenen OŞ, Beyazyürek M, Keskin K, Çavuşlu Ş, Sakarya S, Altunay H, Kalyoncu A, Badur S. Prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HCV, anti-HTLV-1, anti-HIV1–2 in intravenous drug abusers. Klimik Dergisi. 1993;6:35–36. Erişim: http://www.klimikdergisi.org/sayilar/57/buyuk/35-361.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mutlu EA, Altıntoprak AE, Tokucoglu L. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV and syphilis infections among non-injecting drug users. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2015;16:65–68. Erişim: https://www.ejmanager.com/mnstemps/91/apd_16_01_10.pdf?t=1556543229 . [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Karabulut N, Bulut Y, Telo S. Frequency of hepatitis B and C viruses, and HIV among drug addicts in the Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8:e19698. doi: 10.5812/jjm.19698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Toy M, Onder FO, Wormann T, Bozdayi AM, Schalm SW, Borsboom GJ, van Rosmalen J, Richardus JH, Yurdaydin C. Age and region-specific hepatitis B prevalence in Turkey estimated using generalized linear mixed models:a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:337. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ozkan H. Epidemiology of chronic hepatitis B in Turkey. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2018;8:73–74. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tozun N, Ozdogan O, Cakaloglu Y, Idilman R, Karasu Z, Akarca U, Kaymakoglu S, Ergonul O. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections and risk factors in Turkey:a fieldwork TURHEP study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:1020–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Allison RD, Conry-Cantilena C, Koziol D, Schechterly C, Ness P, Gibble J, Kleiner DE, Ghany MG, Alter HJ. A 25-year study of the clinical and histologic outcomes of hepatitis C virus infection and its modes of transmission in a cohort of initially asymptomatic blood donors. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:654–661. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scheinmann R, Hagan H, Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Stern R, Des Jarlais DC, Flom PL, Strauss S. Non-injection drug use and hepatitis C virus:a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;89:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aaron S, McMahon JM, Milano D, Torres L, Clatts M, Tortu S, Mildvan D, Simm M. Intranasal transmission of hepatitis C virus:virological and clinical evidence. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:931–934. doi: 10.1086/591699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mıstık R. Epidemiology of hepatitis C in Turkey. In: Tabak F, Tosun S, editors. Viral Hepatitis. Istanbul: Istanbul Tıp; 2013. pp. 83–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thomas DL, Mahley RW, Badur S, Palaoglu E, Quinn TC. The epidemiology of hepatitis C in Turkey. Infection. 1994;22:411–414. doi: 10.1007/BF01715499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tosun S. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis in Turkey:a meta-analysis of all published papers. In: Tabak F, Tosun S, editors. Viral Hepatitis. Istanbul: Istanbul Tıp; 2013. pp. 27–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gokengin D. Türkiye'de HIV enfeksiyonu: hedefe ne kadar yakınız? Klimik Dergisi. 2018;31:4–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.T. C. Sağlık BakanlığıHIV/AIDS TanıKılavuzu, Ankara. 2018:5–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, Wodak A, Panda S, Tyndall M, Toufik A, Mattick RP. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs:a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372:1733–1745. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61311-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Paraskevis D, Nikolopoulos G, Tsiara C, Paraskeva D, Antoniadou A, Lazanas M, Gargalianos P, Psychogiou M, Malliori M, Kremastinou J, Hatzakis A. HIV-1 outbreak among injecting drug users in Greece. 2011: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill. 2011:16. doi: 10.2807/ese.16.36.19962-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pharris A, Wiessing L, Sfetou O, Hedrich D, Botescu A, Fotiou A, Nikolopoulos GK, Malliori M, Salminen M, Suk JE, Griffiths P, van de Laar MJ. Human immunodeficiency virus in injecting drug users in Europe following a reported increase of cases in Greece and Romania. Euro Surveill. 2011;16:8–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rahimi-Movaghar A, Amin-Esmaeili M, Haghdoost AA, Sadeghirad B, Mohraz M. HIV prevalence amongst injecting drug users in Iran:a systematic review of studies conducted during the decade 1998–2007. Int J Drug Policy. 2012;23:271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Duff P, Tyndall M, Buxton J, Zhang R, Kerr T, Shannon K. Sex-for-Crack exchanges:associations with risky sexual and drug use niches in an urban Canadian city. Harm Reduc J. 2013;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-10-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Strathdee SA, Stockman JK. Epidemiology of HIV among injecting and non-injecting drug users:current trends and implications for interventions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010;7:99–106. doi: 10.1007/s11904-010-0043-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Neuropsychiatry are provided here courtesy of Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society

RESOURCES