Abstract
Background:
Injury prevalence has been well described among baseball athletes; similarly, a better understanding of injuries in softball athletes is needed.
Purpose:
To examine shoulder and elbow injury epidemiology among high school softball athletes in the United States.
Study Design:
Descriptive epidemiological study.
Methods:
Injury data were obtained from the National High School Sports-Related Injury Surveillance System, which captures data from a large national sample of US high schools. Annually, a random sample of 100 high schools provided a representative sample with respect to the 4 US Census geographic regions and 2 school sizes (cutoff point, 1000 students). Athletic trainers from participating schools reported data for athlete-exposures (AEs; practice or competition) and shoulder and elbow injuries from 2005-2006 through 2016-2017.
Results:
A total of 239 shoulder injuries and 85 elbow injuries occurred within 2,095,329 AEs. The overall shoulder injury rate was 1.14 per 10,000 AEs, whereas the overall elbow injury rate was 0.41 per 10,000 AEs. Injuries to the shoulder were more likely to occur during competition as compared with practice (rate ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.99-1.65). Half of the shoulder (50.4%) and elbow 48.9% injuries were due to an overuse/chronic mechanism. Of the athletes sustaining an injury, 86.8% with shoulder injuries and 93.0% with elbow injuries returned to play within 21 days. Only 16.7% of shoulder injuries and 17.5% of elbow injuries were sustained by pitchers.
Conclusion:
Shoulder and elbow injury rates, time to return, and percentage of injuries among pitchers were far lower in high school softball than previously reported values for high school baseball. There were relatively low incidences of shoulder and elbow injuries in high school softball as compared with baseball, with few injuries requiring lengthy time to return to play.
Keywords: injury epidemiology, overuse, pitching, upper extremity
Softball participation in United States (US) high school athletes during the 2016-2017 school year approached the participation rates reported in baseball.1 Associated with the increase in softball participation is an increase in pain and injury to the shoulder and elbow in these athletes.3,14–17 Two recent epidemiologic studies reported the incidence of injuries in small samples of youth and high school softball pitchers and position players.16,18 Pitchers seem to be most at risk for sustaining shoulder and elbow injury, potentially because of the repetitive nature of the pitching motion. In fact, pitchers are 2.6 times more likely to sustain an injury as compared with position players.16 Injuries to pitchers frequently occur at the shoulder, whereas position players are more likely to injure the lower extremity.16,18 Shoulder and elbow injuries can result in time loss from sports participation, with 50% of shoulder and elbow injuries sustained by pitchers resulting in at least 2 weeks of time loss from softball participation.18 Additionally, there is the financial burden to both families and the health care system to care for these injuries.
Understanding the epidemiology and etiology of injuries in softball is critical for the clinicians who treat these athletes, to counsel patients on injury risk and assist with development of injury prevention protocols. In a previous examination of high school softball athletes from 2005 to 2015, a total of 75 elbow injuries were reported, with an overall injury rate of 0.43 per 10,000 athlete-exposures (AEs).10 With the overall injury rate (of all body parts) significantly higher for softball versus baseball athletes,10 more examination into softball injuries is warranted. Despite the data on elbow injuries in softball athletes and established injury rates among high school baseball athletes, there is currently a lack of scientific evidence regarding shoulder injury rates in high school softball athletes.10,13
An examination of shoulder and elbow injury rates and patterns in high school baseball athletes revealed differences in the type of exposure (practice vs competition) as well as by position (position players vs pitchers).13 Despite the similarities in baseball and softball participation rates,10 shoulder and elbow injury rates and patterns in high school softball athletes remain unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the epidemiology of shoulder and elbow injuries in US high school softball athletes from 2005-2006 through 2016-2017. It was hypothesized that softball pitchers would sustain significantly more shoulder and elbow injuries than position players and that the overall shoulder and elbow injury rates would be similar to previously published injury rates in baseball pitchers.
Methods
Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to beginning this study. Shoulder and elbow data for US high school softball players were obtained from the National High School Sports-Related Injury Surveillance System through High School RIO (Reporting Information Online), an internet-based sports injury surveillance system that has been described previously.7,11 In brief, prior to each academic year, high schools with 1 or more National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA)–affiliated certified athletic trainers (ATs) with a valid email address were invited to participate. Responding high schools were categorized into 8 strata based on school size (enrollment ≤1000 or >1000) and the 4 US census geographic regions.4 Twelve or 13 schools from each of the 8 strata were randomly chosen to participate in the nationally representative sample of 100 schools. If a school withdrew during the study, another school from the same stratum was randomly selected for replacement to maintain the 100-school study population. ATs from participating high schools reported injury and AE information on the High School RIO website weekly throughout the academic year. Injury and exposure data used in this study were collected from school years 2005-2006 through 2016-2017. The methods employed mirrored those of Saper et al13 documenting elbow and shoulder injuries in high school baseball players.
Definition of Injury and Exposure
An AE was defined as 1 athlete participating in 1 school-sanctioned practice or competition. A reportable injury was one that (1) occurred as a result of participation in an organized practice or competition, (2) required medical attention by a physician or an AT, and (3) resulted in a restriction of the athlete’s participation for at least 1 day (except for fractures, concussions, heat illnesses or dental injuries, which were captured regardless of time loss). For each injury, the AT submitted a detailed report on the injured athlete (age, height, weight, etc), the injury (side of body, diagnosis, severity, etc), and the injury event (activity, mechanism, etc). Throughout the study, the ATs had access to all data and updated reports as needed.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed with SAS (v 9.4; SAS Institute). Injury rates were calculated as the number of shoulder or elbow injuries per 10,000 AEs. Subgroup differences were evaluated with rate ratios (RRs) or injury proportion ratios (IPRs) and 95% CIs. The RR calculation for comparing practice and competition shoulder injury rates was as follows:
IPRs compared injury patterns. The IPR calculation comparing the proportion of noncontact shoulder injuries with noncontact elbow injuries was as follows:
Continuous variables (eg, age) were expressed as mean ± SD, and categorical variables (eg, mechanism of injury) were expressed as number and percentage. Statistical differences in demographics between groups were examined with independent t tests. Comparison of categorical data was performed with a Pearson χ2 test. The Fisher exact test was used in cases where the expected cell size count was <5. P values <.05 and 95% CIs not containing 1.00 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Overall Injury Patterns
From 2005-2006 through 2016-2017, High School RIO captured 239 shoulder injuries and 85 elbow injuries in 2,095,329 AEs, resulting in a shoulder injury rate of 1.14 and an elbow injury rate of 0.41 per 10,000 AEs (Table 1). The shoulder injury rate was significantly higher than that of the elbow (RR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.20-3.60). When injury rates were examined over time, shoulder injury rates were higher than elbow injury rates, except for the periods 2007-2008 and 2010-2011, when shoulder and elbow injury rates were fairly similar (Figure 1). Injury rates were higher in competition than in practices for the shoulder (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.99-1.65), whereas rates of elbow injuries were fairly even between competition and practice (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.67-1.56) (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Shoulder and Elbow Injury Rates by Exposure Typea
| Competitions | Practices | Overall | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injuries, n | AEs, n | Rateb | Injuries, n | AEs, n | Rateb | Injuries, n | AEs, n | Rateb | Rate Ratioc (95% CI ) | |
| Shoulder | 96 | 721,983 | 1.33 | 143 | 1,373,346 | 1.04 | 239 | 2,095,329 | 1.14 | 1.28 (0.99-1.65) |
| Elbow | 30 | 721,983 | 0.42 | 55 | 1,373,346 | 0.40 | 85 | 2,095,329 | 0.41 | 1.04 (0.67-1.56) |
aAE, athlete-exposure.
bPer 10,000 AEs.
cCompetitions to practices. Statistically significant if 95% CI does not contain 1.00.
Figure 1.
Overall shoulder and elbow injury rates in US high school softball players from 2005-2006 through 2016-2017.
All shoulder and elbow injury characteristics for high school softball players are presented in Table 2. Most injuries to both the shoulder (82.8%) and the elbow (87.1%) were considered new injuries. For about half of the shoulder injuries (50.4%) and elbow injuries 48.9%, the basic mechanism was overuse/chronic. The most common shoulder injuries were muscle strains (30.6%) and tendinitis (23.5%), while the majority of elbow injuries were tendinitis (32.9%), contusion (23.5%), or ligament sprain (17.7%). Injuries were fairly evenly spread among player positions, with pitchers sustaining 16.7% of the shoulder injuries and 17.5% of the elbow injuries.
TABLE 2.
Characteristics of Shoulder Injuries (n = 239) and Elbow Injuries (n = 85) in All Playersa
| Characteristicb | Shoulder, n (%) | Elbow,c n (%) | IPR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateralityd | |||
| Right | 182 (82.4) | 56 (74.7) | 1.10 (0.95-1.28) |
| Left | 38 (17.2) | 19 (25.3) | 0.68 (0.42-1.10) |
| Bilateral | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| New injury or recurrence | |||
| New injury | 197 (82.8) | 74 (87.1) | 0.95 (0.86-1.05) |
| Recurrence (this academic year) | 15 (6.3) | 3 (3.5) | 1.79 (0.53-6.02) |
| Recurrence (prior academic year) | 25 (10.5) | 7 (8.2) | 1.28 (0.57-2.84) |
| Other | 1 (0.4) | 1 (1.2) | NA |
| Position | |||
| Infielder | 80 (36.0) | 19 (23.8) | 1.52 (0.99-2.33) |
| Outfielder | 54 (24.3) | 22 (27.5) | 0.88 (0.58-1.35) |
| Pitcher | 37 (16.7) | 14 (17.5) | 0.95 (0.54-1.67) |
| Catcher | 27 (12.2) | 13 (16.3) | 0.75 (0.41-1.38) |
| Base runner | 14 (6.3) | 2 (2.5) | NA |
| Batter | 7 (3.2) | 9 (11.3) | 0.28 (0.11-0.73) |
| Other | 3 (1.4) | 1 (1.3) | NA |
| Time loss | |||
| <1 wk | 95 (40.6) | 51 (60.0) | 0.68 (0.54-0.85) |
| 1-3 wk | 95 (40.6) | 26 (30.6) | 1.33 (0.93-1.89) |
| >3 wk | 13 (5.6) | 2 (2.4) | 2.34 (0.54-10.25) |
| Did not returne | 31 (13.2) | 6 (7.0) | 1.88 (0.81-4.34) |
| Basic injury mechanism | |||
| Overuse/chronic | 118 (50.4) | 41 (48.9) | 1.03 (0.80-1.33) |
| Noncontact | 60 (25.6) | 16 (19.0) | 1.35 (0.82-2.20) |
| Contact with playing surface | 30 (12.8) | 3 (3.6) | 3.59 (1.13-11.45) |
| Contact with playing apparatus | 9 (3.8) | 20 (23.8) | 0.16 (0.08-0.34) |
| Contact with another person | 9 (3.8) | 1 (1.2) | NA |
| Otherf | 8 (3.4) | 3 (3.6) | NA |
| Diagnosis | |||
| Tendinitis | 56 (23.5) | 28 (32.9) | 0.71 (0.49-1.04) |
| Muscle strain | 73 (30.6) | 7 (8.2) | 3.72 (1.79-7.77) |
| Ligament sprain | 15 (6.3) | 15 (17.7) | 0.36 (0.18-0.70) |
| Contusion | 9 (3.8) | 20 (23.5) | 0.16 (0.08-0.34) |
| Subluxation | 21 (8.8) | 1 (1.2) | NA |
| Tendon strain | 13 (5.4) | 5 (5.9) | 0.93 (0.34-2.53) |
| Other | 13 (5.4) | 2 (2.4) | 2.32 (0.53-10.08) |
| Dislocation | 11 (4.6) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Torn cartilage | 7 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Nerve injury | 6 (2.5) | 1 (1.2) | NA |
| Inflammation | 5 (2.1) | 2 (2.4) | NA |
| Separation | 4 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Hyperextension | 1 (0.4) | 3 (3.6) | NA |
| Bursitis | 2 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Fracture | 1 (0.4) | 1 (1.2) | NA |
| Internal injuries | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
aIPR, injury proportion ratio; NA, not applicable.
bSome characteristics do not total to the full sample size (239 shoulder injuries or 85 elbow injuries) due to unavailable information. Some percentages do not sum to 100.0% because of rounding.
cThe elbow is the reference for all IPRs. Values in bold are statistically significant (95% CI excludes 1.00) Categories with ≤3 case counts were not evaluated for significance.
dSome injuries were bilateral; therefore, the totals do not add to 100.0%. Laterality was in reference to the injury location, not indicative of hand dominance.
eIncludes medical disqualification, athlete choosing not to continue, season ending, or an unspecified reason.
fIncludes illness, contact with an out-of-bounds object, or an unspecified reason.
Pitchers Versus Position Players
The characteristics of combined shoulder and elbow injuries in pitchers and position players are presented in Table 3. Data for injury reports not including a position were excluded from this analysis. It should be noted that there was a large discrepancy in total number of injured pitchers (n = 51) and position players (n = 247). However, it should also be noted that the number of athletic exposures is likely greater for position players than for pitchers. The majority of pitcher (77.1%) and nonpitcher (65.8%) injuries occurred at the varsity level. The most common mechanism of injury in softball pitchers (60.8%) and position players 49.2% was overuse/chronic, though there was no statistical difference between the groups. For pitchers, the highest proportions of injury diagnoses were tendinitis (29.4%) and muscle strain (27.5%). Similarly, tendinitis (26.0%) and muscle strain (24.8%) were the most common diagnoses for position players. Injuries resulting in more than 3 weeks missed were rare for pitchers (2.0%) and position players (4.9%).
TABLE 3.
Characteristics of Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Pitchers (n = 51) and Position Players (n = 247)a
| Characteristicb | Pitchers, Mean ± SD or n (%) | Position Players,c Mean ± SD or n (%) | P Value or IPRd (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 16.02 ± 1.16 | 15.92 ± 1.25 | .62 |
| Height, in | 65.45 ± 3.11 | 64.85 ± 3.31 | .27 |
| Weight, lb | 149.16 ± 28.75 | 141.84 ± 19.6 | .11 |
| Lateralitye | |||
| Right | 43 (89.6) | 177 (79.4) | 1.15 (1.03-1.29) |
| Left | 4 (8.3) | 46 (20.6) | 0.41 (0.16-1.09) |
| Year in school | |||
| Freshman | 11 (21.6) | 68 (27.9) | .27 |
| Sophomore | 11 (21.6) | 66 (27.0) | |
| Junior | 18 (35.3) | 55 (22.5) | |
| Senior | 11 (21.6) | 55 (22.5) | |
| Play level | |||
| Varsity | 37 (77.1) | 150 (65.8) | .29 |
| Junior varsity | 10 (20.8) | 57 (25.0) | |
| Freshman | 1 (2.1) | 12 (5.3) | |
| Combined | 0 (0.0) | 9 (3.9) | |
| Time loss | |||
| <1 wk | 21 (42.0) | 113 (46.5) | 0.90 (0.63-1.28) |
| 1-3 wk | 22 (44.0) | 89 (36.6) | 1.20 (0.84-1.71) |
| >3 wk | 1 (2.0) | 12 (4.9) | NA |
| Did not return f | 6 (12.0) | 29 (11.9) | 1.01 (0.44-2.29) |
| Basic injury mechanism | |||
| Overuse/chronic | 31 (60.8) | 120 (49.2) | 1.24 (0.96-1.59) |
| Noncontact | 14 (27.5) | 54 (22.1) | 1.24 (0.75-2.05) |
| Contact with playing surface | 3 (5.9) | 27 (11.1) | 0.53 (0.17-1.69) |
| Contact with playing apparatus | 3 (5.9) | 23 (9.4) | 0.62 (0.19-2.00) |
| Contact with another person | 0 (0.0) | 10 (4.1) | NA |
| Otherg | 0 (0.0) | 10 (4.1) | NA |
| Diagnosis | |||
| Tendinitis | 15 (29.4) | 64 (26.0) | 1.13 (0.70-1.82) |
| Muscle strain | 14 (27.5) | 61 (24.8) | 1.11 (0.67-1.82) |
| Ligament sprain | 6 (11.8) | 20 (8.1) | 1.45 (0.61-3.42) |
| Tendon strain | 5 (9.8) | 12 (4.9) | 2.01 (0.74-5.46) |
| Contusion | 3 (5.9) | 23 (9.3) | 0.63 (0.20-2.02) |
| Other | 3 (5.9) | 11 (4.5) | NA |
| Subluxation | 1 (1.9) | 19 (7.7) | NA |
| Torn cartilage | 1 (1.9) | 5 (2.0) | NA |
| Hyperextension | 1 (1.9) | 3 (1.2) | NA |
| Internal injuries | 1 (1.9) | 0 (0.0) | NA |
| Nerve injury | 1 (1.9) | 3 (1.2) | NA |
| Dislocation | 0 (0.0) | 10 (4.1) | NA |
| Separation | 0 (0.0) | 4 (1.6) | NA |
| Fracture | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.8) | NA |
| Inflammation | 0 (0.0) | 7 (2.8) | NA |
| Bursitis | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.8) | NA |
aIPR, injury proportion ratio; NA, not applicable.
bSome characteristics do not total to the full sample size (51 pitcher injuries or 247 position player injuries) due to unavailable information. Some percentages do not sum to 100.0% because of rounding.
cPosition players include outfielders, infielders, batters, catchers, base runners, and other nonpitching positions.
dThe position player is the reference for all IPRs. Values in bold are statistically significant (95% CI excludes 1.00). Categories with ≤1 were not evaluated for significance. P values derived from an independent-samples t test performed for continuous variables.
eSome injuries were bilateral; therefore, the totals do not add to 100.0%. Laterality was in reference to the injury location, not indicative of hand dominance.
fIncludes medical disqualification, athlete choosing not to continue, season ending, or an unspecified reason.
gIncludes illness, contact with an out-of-bounds object, or an unspecified reason.
Discussion
The current study evaluated data from the National High School Sports-Related Injury Surveillance System, High School RIO program, to examine the epidemiology of shoulder and elbow injuries among US high school softball athletes during 12 academic years, from 2005-2006 through 2016-2017. The results indicate that shoulder and elbow injury rates were most frequently related to overuse/chronic mechanism in softball athletes. When high school softball athletes sustained shoulder and elbow injuries, the severity was usually minor, and they were able to return to play quickly. Players were able to return to play in <1 week for about half of all injuries and in 1 to 3 weeks for most of the other injuries. Overall injury rates were significantly greater for the shoulder (1.14 per 10,000 AEs) than the elbow (0.41 per 10,000 AEs). Shoulder injury rates were greater than elbow injury rates for most years except in the years 2007-2008 and 2010-2011, when they were similar. It should be noted that the shoulder injury rates reported in the current study were slightly higher than those reported by Krajnik et al7 (1.0 per 10,000 AEs), while the elbow injury rates were slightly lower than has previously been reported (0.43 per 10,000 AEs) in softball athletes.10
By design, the current study used methods similarly employed for a baseball study by Saper et al13 to allow for direct comparison of results (Table 4). The rate of shoulder injuries was slightly lower in softball than baseball. Similarly, in softball, pitchers sustained 16.7% of all reported shoulder injuries, while in baseball, pitchers sustained 39.6% of all shoulder injuries. Differences between the sports were even more dramatic for the elbow. The rate of elbow injuries in softball (0.41 per 10,000 AEs) was less than half that for baseball (0.86 per 10,000 AEs), and pitchers represented only a small percentage of softball elbow injuries (17.5%) as opposed to more than half of all baseball elbow injuries (56.9%). When softball pitchers were injured, it was rare (2.3%) for the pitcher to require >3 weeks to return to play, in contrast to baseball where 21.0% required >3 weeks. Thus, the current study did not support the hypothesis that shoulder and elbow injury rates among softball pitchers are similar to the high injury rates observed in baseball pitchers.
TABLE 4.
Comparison of Shoulder and Elbow Injuries in Softball and Baseballa
| Characteristicb | High School Softball (Current Study) | High School Baseball (Saper et al)13 |
|---|---|---|
| Academic years studied | 2005-2006 through 2016-2017 | 2005-2006 through 2014-2015 |
| No. of high schools monitored each year | 100 | 100 |
| Shoulder injuries | ||
| Per 10,000 AEs | 1.14 | 1.39 |
| Sustained by pitchers, % | 16.7 | 39.6 |
| Elbow injuries | ||
| Per 10,000 AEs | 0.41 | 0.86 |
| Sustained by pitchers, % | 17.5 | 56.9 |
| Pitcher injuries requiring >3 wk to return to play, % | 2.3 | 21.0 |
aAE, athlete-exposure.
There are several differences between softball and baseball that may be related to the differences in injury rates, including the fact that most high school softball players are female whereas most baseball players are male. Male ballplayers have greater height and weight and produce greater shoulder and elbow forces and torques during overhand throwing.5 While softball windmill pitching and baseball overhand pitching produce similar magnitudes of normalized shoulder and elbow forces and torques, the motions of the arm and body are significantly different.2,12,21 Differences in the physical properties of the balls and bats, the size of the field, and the strength and speed of the athletes may also be injury risk factors beyond the scope of the current study.
In the current study, shoulder and elbow injury rates were higher in competitions than in practices. These results are similar to general findings of softball and baseball injury reporting.10,11,13,16 Our study found that the shoulder had the highest competition injury rate (1.33 per 10,000 AEs). This is in agreement with other reports of higher competition injury rates, as well as greater reported shoulder injury rates.3,16 Bonza et al3 examined the incidence of shoulder injury in high school athletes and found that shoulder injury rates and patterns varied by sport, with large proportions of total injuries reported for football, wrestling, baseball, and softball. Higher injury rates in competition may occur because athletes are exerting greater effort in competition than practice or because practices focus more on skill development and may include many repetitions of specific actions.
With respect to mechanism of injury, noncontact and overuse accounted for a high proportion of shoulder injuries (76.0%) and elbow injuries (67.9%). Unlike injury mechanisms in baseball athletes,13 the contact mechanism of injury in softball athletes (player to player, player to playing surface, player to playing apparatus) did not account for the majority of injuries to the shoulder (20.4%) or the elbow (28.6%). Further examination into the contact injuries revealed that more shoulder injuries (12.8%) occurred from contact with the playing surface, while more elbow injuries (23.8%) were the result of contact with a playing apparatus. These findings agree with what has been previously reported in the baseball literature, which postulated getting hit by a pitch as a possible mechanism of elbow injury.13
For the majority of shoulder (81.2%) and elbow (90.6%) injuries, the softball player returned to sport within 3 weeks. These findings are in agreement with previous examinations of softball injury rates where most injuries were minor and did not require >3 weeks of time loss.9,16,19 Injuries during the high school softball season cause minimal disability, which may be reflective of injury management and recognition. Thus, the financial burden to families and the health care system to care for these minor injuries is subsequently low. The injury rates that were observed should be interpreted with caution, as the high school softball season represents a small portion of a competitive athlete’s softball participation. Competitive softball athletes often place more emphasis on participation on elite travel teams than their high school team. Future studies should aim to examine shoulder and elbow injury rates in softball athletes participating on elite travel teams, as these teams may have more rigorous practice and game schedules, which place an athlete at greater risk of injury.
This study had limitations, most of which were associated with the restrictions of the injury surveillance database. Only high schools with NATA-affiliated certified ATs are eligible to participate in High School RIO, which likely limits the generalizability of our findings in schools without an AT. The ATs were not required to report minor injuries that did not result in time loss; thus, the injuries reported are an underestimate of all sustained injuries and are more likely to exclude minor injuries, such as those resulting in chronic pain but not missed participation. Additionally, injury reporting diagnosis and compliance with the surveillance system methodology were ultimately at the discretion of the individual AT. However, publicly available High School RIO annual summary reports containing detailed information on internal validity checks indicate a high degree of accuracy and completeness of the captured data.6,13,20 Additionally, a study comparing the accuracy of AT and physician diagnoses in sports medicine found high agreement.8 Another limitation of the database is that it does not allow for the investigation of the full spectrum of treatment information that might affect clinical practice. The RIO database does not account for specific measures of exposure, such as number of games or innings played and pitch counts. Despite the limitations, this study provides the most comprehensive epidemiological investigation to date of shoulder and elbow injuries among the largest and most representative sample of US high school softball athletes.
Conclusion
Shoulder injuries in high school softball were more common than elbow injuries, and shoulder injury rates were relatively constant over time while elbow injury rates decreased significantly over time. Injured athletes usually returned to sport within 3 weeks. Approximately 17% of shoulder and elbow injuries were sustained by pitchers. The rates of elbow injury, percentage of shoulder and elbow injuries in pitchers, and percentage of injuries requiring lengthy time to return were much lower for high school softball compared with previously published data for high school baseball. These findings from a large, nationally representative sample of US high schools are clinically relevant both for providing updated epidemiological data on softball injuries for clinicians counseling patients on injury risks and for providing trend-over-time data to clinicians evaluating body site–specific injury prevention efforts.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the many athletic trainers who volunteered their time and efforts to submit data to High School RIO. They have had a tremendously positive effect on the safety of high school student-athletes, and their efforts are greatly appreciated.
Footnotes
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding for the High School Reporting Information Online was provided in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grants R49/CE000674-01 and R49/CE001172-01). M.G.S. has received research support from DJO, educational support from Smith & Nephew, and speaking fees from Arthrex. R.D.C. has received research support from the National Federation State High School Association, National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, and DJO. A.W.A. has received research support from Ceterix Orthopedics; consulting fees from Arthrex, Blue Belt Technologies, Mako Surgical Group, Microaire, and Procedural Orthopedics; and speaking fees from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew. J.R.A. has received consulting fees from Halyard Health and speaking fees from Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the St Vincent’s Health System Institutional Review Board.
References
- 1. 2017-2018 High School Athletics Participation Survey. National Federation of State High School Associations website. http://www.nfhs.org/participationstatistics/pdf/2017-18%20high%20school%20athletics%20participation%20survey.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2019.
- 2. Barrentine SW, Fleisig GS, Whiteside JA, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR. Biomechanics of windmill softball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms at the shoulder and elbow. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(6):405–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bonza JE, Fields SK, Yard EE, Comstock RD. Shoulder injuries among United States high school athletes during the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 school years. J Athl Train. 2009;44(1):76–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Census regions of the United States. US Census Bureau website. https://www.census.gov/const/regionmap.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2016.
- 5. Chu Y, Fleisig G, Simpson K, Andrews J. Biomechanical comparison between elite female and male baseball pitchers. J Appl Biomech. 2009;25:22–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Khodaee M, Currie DW, Asif IM, Comstock RD. Nine-Year study of US high school soccer injuries: data from a national sports injury surveillance programme. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(3):185–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Krajnik S, Fogarty KJ, Yard EE, Comstock RD. Shoulder injuries in US high school baseball and softball athletes, 2005-2008. Pediatrics. 2010;125(3):497–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lombardi NJ, Tucker B, Freedman KB, et al. Accuracy of athletic trainer and physician diagnoses in sports medicine. Orthopedics. 2016;39(5):e944–e949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Powell JW, Barber-Foss KD. Injury patterns in selected high school sports: a review of the 1995-1997 seasons. J Athl Train. 1999;34(3):277–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pytiak AV, Kraeutler MJ, Currie DW, McCarty EC, Comstock RD. An epidemiological comparison of elbow injuries among United States high school baseball and softball players, 2005-2006 through 2014-2015. Sports Health. 2018;10(2):119–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rechel JA, Yard EE, Comstock RD. An epidemiologic comparison of high school sports injuries sustained in practice and competition. J Athl Train. 2008;43(2):197–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rojas IL, Provencher MT, Bhatia S, et al. Biceps activity during windmill softball pitching: injury implications and comparison with overhand throwing. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(3):558–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Saper M, Pierpoint LA, Liu W, Comstock RD, Polousky JD, Andrews J. Epidemiology of shoulder and elbow injuries among United States high school baseball players: school years 2005-2006 through 2014-2015. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(1):37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sauers EL, Dykstra DL, Bay RC, Bliven KH, Snyder AR. Upper extremity injury history, current pain rating, and health-related quality of life in female softball pitchers. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(1):100–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shanley E, Michener LA, Ellenbecker TS, Rauh MJ. Shoulder range of motion, pitch count, and injuries among interscholastic female softball pitchers: a descriptive study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(5):548–557. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shanley E, Rauh MJ, Michener LA, Ellenbecker TS. Incidence of injuries in high school softball and baseball players. J Athl Train. 2011;46(6):648–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Skillington SA, Brophy RH, Wright RW, Smith MV. Effect of pitching consecutive days in youth fast-pitch softball tournaments on objective shoulder strength and subjective shoulder symptoms. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(6):1413–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Smith MV, Davis R, Brophy RH, Prather H, Garbutt J, Wright RW. Prospective player-reported injuries in female youth fast-pitch softball. Sports Health. 2015;7(6):497–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Swenson DM, Yard EE, Fields SK, Comstock RD. Patterns of recurrent injuries among US high school athletes, 2005-2008. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(8):1586–1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tirabassi J, Brou L, Khodaee M, Fields SK, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of high school sports-related injiries resulting in medical disqualification: 2005-2006 through 2013-2014 academic years. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):2925–2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Werner SL, Jones DG, Guido JA, Jr, Brunet ME. Kinematics and kinetics of elite windmill softball pitching. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(4):597–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]