Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2018 Mar 1;26(6):1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.01.014

Phragmites australis — a helophytic grass — can establish successful partnership with phenol-degrading bacteria in a floating treatment wetland

Hamna Saleem a,b, Muhammad Arslan b,c,⁎, Khadeeja Rehman b, Razia Tahseen b, Muhammad Afzal b
PMCID: PMC6733312  PMID: 31516347

Abstract

Helophytic plants contribute significantly in phytoremediation of a variety of pollutants due to their physiological or biochemical mechanisms. Phenol, which is reported to have negative/deleterious effects on plant metabolism at concentrations higher than 500 mg/L, remains hard to be removed from the environmental compartments using conventional phytoremediation procedures. The present study aims to investigate the feasibility of using P. australis (a helophytic grass) in combination with three bacterial strains namely Acinetobacter lwofii ACRH76, Bacillus cereus LORH97, and Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90, in a floating treatment wetland (FTW) for the removal of phenol from contaminated water. The strains were screened based on their phenol degrading and plant growth promoting activities. We found that inoculated bacteria were able to colonize in the roots and shoots of P. australis, suggesting their potential role in the successful removal of phenol from the contaminated water. Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 dominated the bacterial community structure followed by A. lowfii ACRH76 and B. cereus LORH97. The removal rate was significantly high when compared with the individual partners, i.e., plants and bacteria separately. The plant biomass, which was drastically reduced in the presence of phenol, recovered significantly with the inoculation of bacterial consortia. Likewise, highest reduction in chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and total organic carbon (TOC) is achieved when both plants and bacteria were employed. The study, therefore, suggests that P. australis in combination with efficient bacteria can be a suitable choice to FTWs for phenol-degradation in water.

Keywords: Floating treatment wetlands, P. australis, Phenol, Plant-bacteria partnership, Rhizospheric, Endophytic bacteria

1. Introduction

Phenol (or hydroxybenzene) is a commonly found pollutant in industrial wastewaters. The compound is produced both synthetically and naturally; nevertheless, synthetic production has been increased multi-fold recently. It has been reported that in 2015, world’s annual production of the phenolic compounds exceeded 10 million tons, which is expected to increase up to 11.6 million tons in 2020 (Plotkin, 2017). Almost every industry viz a viz petrochemical, pharmaceutical, agriculture, tanning, paper and pulp, iron smelting, food, resin, etc. depends heavily on phenolic compounds for its manufacturing processes (Herouvim et al., 2011, Tatoulis et al., 2015). Many of these phenol-containing wastes are discharged directly into the wastewaters causing further contaminations of surface and groundwater (Huang et al., 2012, Stefanakis and Thullner, 2016). Some of the phenolic compounds have been detected up to 10,000 mg/L of concentration (van Schie and Young, 2000); whose genotoxic, immunotoxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects are also reported accordingly, Cf., list of priority pollutants (USEPA, 1979, Wu et al., 2012). The persistence nature also allows their bioaccumulation in the biotic elements, rendering them as a pollutant of concerns (Liu et al., 2011, Liu et al., 2012).

Recent advances in ecological engineering have helped establish innovative phytoremediation systems for the treatment of wastewaters (Chen et al., 2016, Ijaz et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2015). These include floating treatment wetlands (FTW) that harbor rooted and/or emergent plants of aquatic or terrestrial origin, grown on self-buoyant mats being fixed on wastewater reservoirs (Keizer-Vlek et al., 2014, Lynch et al., 2015, Yeh et al., 2015). These mats allow plants to extend their roots deep into the contaminated waters; allowing development of a large biologically active area in the form of biofilms for the physical entrapment, biochemical transformation, and degradation of the organic pollutants (Kyambadde et al., 2005, Weragoda et al., 2012). The success of such a system purely relies on microbial community in the biofilm as well as on the plant species (Arslan et al., 2017b, Glick, 2010, Weyens et al., 2009). Some of the pollutants are, however, toxic enough to downgrade the overall cleaning process by reducing the plant growth and inhibiting bacterial degradation (Alkio et al., 2005). Phenol is among these pollutants, and can affect both of the processes due to its bactericidal properties and plant metabolic malfunctioning potential (Adeboye et al., 2014, Kottuparambil et al., 2014, Phenrat et al., 2017, Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). To overcome such a situation, artificial augmentation of rhizobacteria and/or endophytic bacteria, having antagonistic activities for the specific pollution type, have been proposed in a variety of phytoremediation experiments (Afzal et al., 2014, Khan et al., 2013, Weyens et al., 2009). The successful partnership allows plants to provide nutrients and residency to the inoculated bacteria while bacteria in return improve the plant health by reducing stress, producing phytohormones and nutrients, and by providing pollutant degradation services (Glick, 2010, Glick, 2014, Weyens et al., 2009).

The common reed Phragmites australis (Cav.), a helophytic grass, is reported to withstand harsh environmental conditions including contaminant stress (Davies et al., 2005, Hechmi et al., 2014, Schröder et al., 2008). The species grows in marshes, swamps, and wet waste areas and therefore can be exploited in FTWs for the remediation of wastewaters. In principle, the species allows adsorption of the organic contaminants to the roots, without being translocated to aboveground plant parts, rendering it suitable for the removal of organic volatile compounds (Van der Werff, 1991). Moreover, members of the helophytic grasses are able to transport atmospheric oxygen to the rhizosphere hence helping them survive in waterlogged conditions. This oxygen flow from leaves to roots further helps the microbial respiration by creating gradients of redox conditions ultimately supporting the biofilm functioning (Syranidou et al., 2016).

Keeping in mind these facts, we established FTW microcosms by employing P. australis as a model plant, in partnership with the two rhizospheric bacterial strains (Bacillus cereus LORH97 and Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90) and one endophytic bacterial strain (Acinetobacter lwofii ACRH76). This study aims to elucidate (1) the potential of employing P. australis in a bacterial assisted FTW, and (2) the success of established FTWs for remediation of phenol-contaminated water. Moreover, bacterial persistence in the rhizosphere and endosphere of the plant is evaluated.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bacterial strains

Three bacterial strains namely Acinetobacter lwofii ACRH76 (NCBI accession number KF478224), Bacillus cereus LORH97 (NCBI accession number KF478239), and Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 (NCBI accession number KF478222) were used in the current study (Fatima et al., 2015). The strains A. lwofii ACRH76 and B. cereus LORH97 were isolated from the rhizosphere of Acacia ampliceps and Lolium perenne, respectively, whereas Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 was isolated from the shoot interior of Lecucaena leucocephala. The strains were selected based on their ability to utilize phenol as a sole carbon source, i.e., carrying clusters of alk and cyp genes; metabolic functioning was tested on minimal salt medium containing 100 mg l−1 of phenol. Moreover, B. cereus LORH97 and Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 possessed 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activities, a stress alleviation trait of plant growth promoting bacteria, tested on 0.7 g of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) l−1 (Kuffner et al., 2008). The strains were then cultivated in 10% Luria–Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C, previously amended with 50 mg l−1 of phenol. Cells were harvested by centrifugation followed by re-suspension in 0.9% (w/v) of NaCl solution. Finally, the optical density of each bacterial strain was adjusted to get 107 cells ml−1, the suspension was mixed in 1:1:1 ratio and 150 ml of the consortium was inoculated in each reactor, where required.

2.2. Construction of FTW microcosms

The experiment was conducted in March 2017 at National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan for two months. Fifteen FTW phytoreactors were established using Diamond Jumbolon sheet (Diamond Foam Company, Pvt. Ltd. Pakistan) and polyethylene tanks (20-liter capacity). The sheet was used to make floating mat after cutting it into 20 (length) × 15 (width) × 3 (thickness) inches; and five holes were drilled at equal distance to insert healthy seedlings of P. australis in the mat, i.e., 40–50 seedlings for each reactor (Fig. 1) (Patil et al., 1994, Mehmood et al., 2013). The seedlings were then allowed to develop roots for a month in the tap water while Hoagland solution was applied fortnightly to augment the process of root-establishment. After 30 days of acclimatization, tanks and plant roots were surface-sterilized with 5% NaOCl solution and the water of the tank was spiked with phenol (500 mg l−1). The concentration was selected based on earlier observations that of phenol (500 mg l−1) in water can decrease 50% of evapotranspiration in willow trees (Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). The observations were made in triplicates and different treatments were:

  • •

    T1: vegetated reactor containing tap water – control

  • •

    T2: un-vegetated reactor containing phenol-contaminated water – control

  • •

    T3: un-vegetated reactor containing phenol-contaminated water and bacterial consortium

  • •

    T4: vegetated reactor containing phenol-contaminated water

  • •

    T5: vegetated reactor containing phenol-contaminated water and bacterial consortium

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic representation of floating mat with holes for plantation of healthy seedlings of P. australis (A); construction of phytoreactors with container and floating mat (B-C); experimental setup showing plant biomass (C). The tanks were covered to avoid sunlight penetration.

2.3. Plant biomass

Plant tissues were cut 2 cm above the mat surface after 15 days experimental period. The fresh and dry biomass of both roots and shoots was then measured to reveal the effect of bacterial inoculation and phenol contamination on plant growth and development. Dry biomass was determined after three days in an oven at 50 °C (Arslan et al., 2014).

2.4. Phenol estimation

APHA standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater were used to estimate the residual phenol concentration in water samples (APHA, 2005).

2.5. Water quality parameters analyses

The water quality parameters were evaluated using established protocols (APHA, 2005). These included BOD, COD, TOC, and pH as they define the quality of water (Eaton et al., 2005). Additionally, dissolved oxygen (DO) was measured temporally to evaluate wetland performance over time.

2.6. Survival/colonization of inoculated bacteria

The survival of the inoculated bacteria was determined in the treated water, rhizospheric water, and plant endosphere at the end of the experiment. The endophytic bacteria were isolated from the shoots and roots interior was performed after surface sterilization as per established protocols (Yusuf et al. 2010). Briefly, roots and shoots were washed for 2 min in sterile distilled water followed by treatment with 70% ethanol for 10 min (for roots) and 5 min (for shoots). Subsequently, the tissues were rinsed for 1 min in 1% NaOCl amended with 0.01% Tween 20 solution. Finally, the surface sterilized roots and shoot were washed thrice with sterile distilled water and the surface sterility of the last rinse was checked by spreading 100 µl aliquot on nutrient enriched LB medium. Afterwards, 5 g of the surface sterilized roots and shoots were grounded with a pestle and mortar in 10 ml NaCl solution (0.9%, w/v) to make the suspension. Thereon, 100 μl of the suspension and rhizospheric water were plated on M9 media (up to 10−6) containing phenol as a sole energy source (50 mg l−1). The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 48 h, followed by counting of colony forming units (CFU) using OpenCFU software (Geissmann, 2013). A statistically significant number of colonies were picked and subjected to IGS-PCR and RFLP analyses (Ijaz et al., 2015). Each RFLP reaction constituted 7 µL PCR product, 1 µL HindIII enzyme, 1.5 µL R-buffer, and 5.5 µL deionized water, to make a total of 15 µL reaction.

2.7. Statistical analysis

The plant biomass, residual phenol, pollution parameters, CFU counts, and mutagenicity levels were subjected to statistical analysis in R statistical language. One-way ANOVA was used to test the significant differences among different treatments, considering Tukey's test, after testing the homogeneity of variance. We also performed nMDS analysis (Bray-Curtis similarity) to compare the distribution of inoculated bacteria based on their RFLP profile.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Plant biomass and growth

The fresh and dry biomass of plant tissues (root and shoot) was measured to elucidate the influence of phenol toxicity and respective bacterial inoculation on growth of P. australis (Table 1). It can be seen that the phenol contamination (T4) inhibited plant biomass development, whereas bacterial inoculation (T5) improved the biomass production. The reduction in biomass can be attributed to the presence of phenol in water since its toxic nature can drastically affect the plant health parameters such evapotranspiration, photosynthesis rate, etc. (Kottuparambil et al., 2014, Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). It has been reported that, in willow plants, 50% of the evapotranspiration was dropped after its exposure to water containing phenol 500 mg l−1 whereas complete plant death occurred at 1000 mg l−1 of phenol exposure (Ucisik and Trapp, 2006). The molecular mechanisms behind this drop in evapotranspiration have remained least investigated; however, in our other studies of antibiotics exposure (100 µg l−1), we have seen direct damages to plant vascular bundles, increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), necrosis of plant roots, and dysbiosis in indigenous endophytic bacteria, ultimately leading to weakening of plant basal defense mechanisms (Arslan et al., 2017a). In the present study, we also observed that the root network of P. australis turned necrotic in the presence of phenol (T4) without bacterial inoculation. This investigation is in agreement with Phenrat et al., (2017), which also reported severe degradation of plant roots at 500 mg l−1 concentration of phenol in water in the first few days of exposure. Another reason for decreased biomass is the overloading of the plant detoxification system after continuous uptake/accumulation of phenol in plant tissues. This is because of the optimal octanol/water partition coefficient (log Kow = 1.46) of phenol. Nevertheless, indigenous bacteria and plants cannot increase the enzymatic efficiency significantly to cope with the external pressures and therefore can lead to severe toxic effects, i.e., the concept of internal exposure concentration (Escher et al., 2004).

Table 1.

Reed root and shoot biomass measured after 15 days of the experiment period.

Treatments Root biomass (g) Shoot biomass (g)
Fresh Dry Fresh Dry
Vegetated (-phenol) 181.1a (21.9) 57.4a (4.1) 963a (98) 268a (34)
Vegetated and un-inoculated (+phenol) 76.5b (7.2) 22.9b (2.4) 593b (53) 124b (26)
Vegetated and inoculated (+phenol) 159.7a (27.8) 51.1ab (9.9) 815ab (46) 256a (39)
Open in a new tab

Each value is a mean of three replicates; means in the same column followed by different letter are statistically different at 5% level of significance; standard deviations are presented in parentheses.

On the other hand, bacterial inoculation increased the biomass of P. australis in the presence of phenol in water (T5); this could be linked to the ACC deaminase activities of the two inoculated strains, i.e., B. cereus LORH97 and Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90. It is an established fact that the bacteria possessing ACC deaminase capabilities are able to reduce the contaminant induced stress for the developing plant, ultimately improving the plant health even in the presence of contamination (Compant et al., 2010, Glick, 2010, Saleem, 2016, Saravanakumar et al., 2011). This improved biomass is further confirmed by ANOVA since less significant differences (p < .05) were observed between control (T1) and inoculated plants (T5).

3.2. Phenol removal

The phenol removal by different FTWs is presented in Table 2. Lowest phenol removal was observed in the reactors with bacterial consortium only (T3), whereas vegetated reactors were able to remove a higher amount of phenol (T4). This could be due to the fact that the phenolic compounds, when present in the environment at high concentrations, are toxic for bacterial communities and can inhibit/reduce the overall metabolic efficiency (Adeboye et al., 2014). However, higher phenol removal by plants, as compared to bacteria, can be associated with the optimal octanol–water partition coefficient leading to successful uptake/removal of phenol by plants. This is more evident in the initial 5-day exposure phase since most of the phenol was removed in this period and, thereafter, only a smaller fraction was removed suggesting the effect of physiological damages as explained earlier. (Riaz et al., 2017) reported that the accumulation of organic pollutants within plant tissues could trigger high ROS production, ending up into plant anatomical damages. Nevertheless, vegetated reactors in combination with bacterial consortia (T5) were able to remove the highest concentration of phenol; which is verified at statistical inference of p < .01. This is in agreement with the earlier studies describing the usefulness of bacterial augmentation in classical phytoremediation systems (Afzal et al., 2013). Such partnership systems have been widely adopted around the world with engineered modifications, aiming to accelerate the natural phytoremediation process with designed objectives (Chen et al., 2016, Ijaz et al., 2016, Newman and Reynolds, 2005, White and Cousins, 2013).

Table 2.

Effect of inoculum and vegetation on phenol removal.

Treatments Initial 5 days 10 days 15 days
Control 500 389.4a (26.6) 347.7a (34.4) 333.5a (23.8)
Inoculated 500 327.7ab (24.2) 293.3ab (23.1) 194.6b (19.3)
Vegetated 500 202.3b (29.3) 188.1b (17.4) 167bc (21.3)
Vegetated and Inoculated 500 149.4bc (15.6) 45.3c (11.3) 19.3c (3.1)
Open in a new tab

Each value is a mean of three replicates; means in the same column followed by different letter are statistically different at 5% level of significance; standard deviations are presented in parentheses.

3.3. Water quality parameters

Established FTWs were able to improve the quality of water by lowering their respective COD, BOD, and TOC values (Table 3). The pollution load was highest in the un-vegetated reactors (T2); while a slight reduction was observed in un-vegetated reactors containing only bacterial consortium (T3) followed by vegetated contaminated reactors (T4). Anyhow, significantly highest reduction of COD, BOD, and TOC was observed in the bacterially assisted vegetated reactors (T5), i.e., COD reduced from 1057 to 122 mg l−1, BOD from 423 to 78 mg l−1, and TOC from 359 to 53 mg l−1, after 15 days of the treatment. The high oxygen concentration in water is one of the fundamental parameters of water quality and high concentration of organic matter in water can decrease oxygen concentration, and affect metabolic functioning of the indigenous microbial community (Trivedy and Goel, 1984). The inoculation of phenol-degrading bacteria (T3), however, would have decreased the contaminant level but at the expense of oxygen (Chen et al., 2010, Demoling and Bååth, 2008). While in vegetated reactors (T4), comparatively high removal can be attributed to the continuous uptake of the pollutant as well the potential of transporting atmospheric oxygen to the rhizosphere of P. australis (Van der Werff, 1991). In the bacterial assisted vegetated reactors (T5), successful interactions between plant-roots and rhizospheric bacteria are obvious to be established causing diffusion of surrounding oxygen into the plant rhizosphere as well as removal of contaminant load with the passage of time (Morris and Monier, 2003, Vymazal, 2010, Vymazal, 2013). This was revealed during temporal measurement of dissolved oxygen, where bacterially assisted reactors were able to recover while all other reactors suffered from oxygen depletion (Fig. 2). The pH of the treated water was also improved (acidic to neutral conditions), which is also attributed to the combined action of phenol transformations by bacteria as well as the use of organic acids by the plants (Ijaz et al., 2015).

Table 3.

Water quality parameters for the treated water at the end of experiment.

Treatments COD BOD pH TOC
Control 1057a (45) 423a (34) 5.8b (0.0) 359a (34)
Inoculated 514b (25) 281b (14) 6.6ab (0.01) 165b (15)
Vegetated 476b (29) 223b (22) 6.7ab (0.01) 172b (11)
Vegetated & Inoculated 122c (7) 78c (6) 7.2a (0.01) 53c (5)
Open in a new tab

Each value is a mean of three replicates; means in the same column followed by different letter are statistically different at 5% level of significance; standard deviations are presented in parentheses.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Temporal assessment of dissolved oxygen for evaluating system’s performance.

3.4. Survival/colonization of inoculated bacteria

The survival of inoculated bacteria was determined in the rhizospheric water, roots interior, and shoots interior of the plant (Fig. 3). Comparatively, bacterial persistence was less commonly observed in the un-vegetated reactors (T3) as compared to the vegetated reactors (T5). This could have been caused by the absence of plant roots (symbiotic partner) resulting in reduced survival of inoculated bacteria (Arslan et al., 2014). Moreover, as all of the inoculated bacteria were previously isolated from the plant rhizosphere and/or endosphere; they may have developed necessary mechanisms of proliferation in the presence of host only (Afzal et al., 2014). This is the reason that persistence of inoculated bacteria was more evident in the vegetated reactors (T5). In the vegetated reactors (T5), 38% of the total population was appeared to be A. lwofii ACRH76, followed by 24% of B. cereus LORH97. The endophytic species Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 dominated the plant endosphere as it was recorded to be 68% of the total bacterial endophytes. Many of the earlier studies have reported the similar findings that the rhizospheric bacteria acclimatize and proliferate the rhizosphere whereas, endophytic bacteria colonize plant interior (Ho et al., 2013, Ho et al., 2012, Ijaz et al., 2016, Ijaz et al., 2015, Li et al., 2011, Li et al., 2010, Vacca et al., 2005). The colonization potential of endophytic bacteria appeared to be highly significant for P. australis, which support its suitability as wetland plant in addition to its helophytic properties. The parallel experiments on phenol degradation using Typha domingensis also achieved successful removal; nevertheless, bacterial persistence was limited to only Pseudomonas sp. LCRH90 (Saleem et al., In Press). The present study therefore presents not only an effective solution to overall phytoremediation success but also elucidate the nature P. australis as potential niche provider to endophytic and rhizospheric bacterial communities. This finding is further confirmed by nMDS analysis that distinctly separates the communities of endophytic bacteria from rhizospheric bacteria (Fig. 4); which was previously observed to be valid for the medium only (Cf. Saleem et al., In Press).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Persistence of inoculated bacteria in the treated water, root interior, and shoot interior of T. domingensis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

The nMDS ordination of inoculated bacterial consortium based on RFLP profile.

Based on these facts, it can be argued that efficient bacterial colonization can help develop an efficient system for the cleanup phenol especially at higher concentration, which remained difficult in classical phytoremediation experiments. A number of studies have reported potential key species of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria which can be employed in combination with plants for efficient removal of phenol (Krastanov et al., 2013, Liu et al., 2016, Gu et al., 2016). Iqbal et al., (2017) reported such a partnership in which phenol and benzene were removed by endophytic bacterial strains namely Achromobacter sp. (AIEB-7), Pseudomonas sp. (AIEB-4), and Alcaligenes sp. (AIEB-6) when inoculated with Cannabis sativa. Nevertheless, studies employing plant-bacteria partnerships are relatively few and most of them rely only to the bacterial potential of phenol degradation in classical lab experiments. Therefore, there is a need to validate if these key species can be used for bacterial assisted phytoremediation studies. Moreover, to find plant species that can serve as appropriate host for these bacteria is equally crucial.

4. Conclusions

Helophytic plants can be a suitable choice in FTW for phytoremediation of phenolic compounds. The technology is an innovative product of ecological engineering and can be engineered to harness phytological and microbiological remediation at all levels. The current study is an example of such a system that was engineered in a way to restore contaminated water with phenolic compounds. The system performance was up to the mark as successful removal of phenol was observed in the established FTWs with reduced COD, BOD, and TOC levels. Although the study was conducted in microcosm, we observed successful interaction of inoculated bacteria with P. australis suggesting the potential role of helophytic grasses in plant-bacteria partnership. Therefore, engineering the potential of helophytic plants with pollutant-degrading bacteria could be a promising area in the wastewater treatment. Last but not least, the technology relies on near-natural means of remediation and comparable little energy is needed for its operation, this makes it particularly attractive for the countries with more economic constraints such as Pakistan.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by International Foundation of Science, Sweden, and Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (research grant number W/5104-2), and Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan (research grant number 20-3854/R&D/HEC/14).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Adeboye P.T., Bettiga M., Olsson L. The chemical nature of phenolic compounds determines their toxicity and induces distinct physiological responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in lignocellulose hydrolysates. AMB Exp. 2014;4:46. doi: 10.1186/s13568-014-0046-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afzal M., Khan Q.M., Sessitsch A. Endophytic bacteria: prospects and applications for the phytoremediation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere. 2014;117:232–242. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Afzal M., Khan S., Iqbal S., Mirza M.S., Khan Q.M. Inoculation method affects colonization and activity of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN during phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013;85:331–336. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alkio M., Tabuchi T.M., Wang X., Colón-Carmona A. Stress responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Arabidopsis include growth inhibition and hypersensitive response-like symptoms. J. Exp. Bot. 2005;56:2983–2994. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. APHA, 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  6. Arslan M., Afzal M., Amin I., Iqbal S., Khan Q.M. Nutrients can enhance the abundance and expression of alkane hydroxylase CYP153 gene in the rhizosphere of ryegrass planted in hydrocarbon-polluted soil. PloS One. 2014;9:e111208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arslan, M., Marcello, S., Wiessner, A., Neu, T., Pieper, D., Müller, J.A., 2017a. Dysbiosis in plant-endophyte partnership: repeated short exposures of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim at micro-concentrations can disturb the microbial community in soft rush, Juncus effusus. In: The first International Conference on Microbial Ecotoxicology. Frontiers, Lyon (France).
  8. Arslan, M., Ullah, I., Müller, J.A., Shahid, N., Afzal, M., 2017. Organic micropollutants in the environment: ecotoxicity potential and methods for remediation. In: Enhancing Cleanup of Environmental Pollutants Springer, pp. 65–99.
  9. Chen H., Yao J., Wang F., Zhou Y., Chen K., Zhuang R. Toxicity of three phenolic compounds and their mixtures on the gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis in the aquatic environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2010;408:1043–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen Z., Cuervo D.P., Müller J.A., Wiessner A., Köser H., Vymazal J. Hydroponic root mats for wastewater treatment—a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23:15911–15928. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6801-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Compant S., Clément C., Sessitsch A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010;42:669–678. [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies L.C., Carias C.C., Novais J.M., Martins-Dias S. Phytoremediation of textile effluents containing azo dye by using Phragmites australis in a vertical flow intermittent feeding constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2005;25:594–605. [Google Scholar]
  13. Demoling L.A., Bååth E. Use of pollution-induced community tolerance of the bacterial community to detect phenol toxicity in soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2008;27:334–340. doi: 10.1897/07-289R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eaton, A.D., Franson, M.A.H., 2005. American Public Health A, American Water Works A, Water Environment F. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater: American Public Health Association.
  15. Escher B., Hermens J., Schwarzenbach R. Internal exposure: linking bioavailability to effects. International workshop, 27 August 2004, Monte Verità, Switzerland. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. August 2004;2005(12):57–60. doi: 10.1065/espr2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fatima K., Afzal M., Imran A., Khan Q.M. Bacterial rhizosphere and endosphere populations associated with grasses and trees to be used for phytoremediation of crude oil contaminated soil. Bull. Environ. Contaminat. Toxicol. 2015;94:314–320. doi: 10.1007/s00128-015-1489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Geissmann Q. OpenCFU, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects. PloS One. 2013;8:e54072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Glick B.R. Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010;28:367–374. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Glick B.R. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol. Res. 2014;169:30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gu Q., Wu Q., Zhang J., Guo W., Wu H., Sun M. Community analysis and recovery of phenol-degrading bacteria from drinking water biofilters. Front. Microbiol. 2016:7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hechmi N., Aissa N.B., Abdenaceur H., Jedidi N. Evaluating the phytoremediation potential of Phragmites australis grown in pentachlorophenol and cadmium co-contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:1304–1313. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1997-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Herouvim E., Akratos C.S., Tekerlekopoulou A., Vayenas D.V. Treatment of olive mill wastewater in pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2011;37:931–939. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ho Y.-N., Hsieh J.-L., Huang C.-C. Construction of a plant-microbe phytoremediation system: Combination of vetiver grass with a functional endophytic bacterium, Achromobacter xylosoxidans F3B, for aromatic pollutants removal. Bioresource Technol. 2013;145:43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ho Y.-N., Mathew D.C., Hsiao S.-C., Shih C.-H., Chien M.-F., Chiang H.-M. Selection and application of endophytic bacterium Achromobacter xylosoxidans strain F3B for improving phytoremediation of phenolic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;219:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Huang Y.Q., Wong C.K.C., Zheng J.S., Bouwman H., Barra R., Wahlström B. Bisphenol A (BPA) in China: a review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environ. Int. 2012;42:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ijaz A., Iqbal Z., Afzal M. Remediation of sewage and industrial effluent using bacterially assisted floating treatment wetlands vegetated with Typha domingensis. Water Sci. Technol. 2016;74:2192–2201. doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ijaz A., Shabir G., Khan Q.M., Afzal M. Enhanced remediation of sewage effluent by endophyte-assisted floating treatment wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2015;84:58–66. [Google Scholar]
  28. Keizer-Vlek H.E., Verdonschot P.F.M., Verdonschot R.C.M., Dekkers D. The contribution of plant uptake to nutrient removal by floating treatment wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2014;73:684–690. [Google Scholar]
  29. Khan S., Afzal M., Iqbal S., Mirza M.S., Khan Q.M. Inoculum pretreatment affects bacterial survival, activity and catabolic gene expression during phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2013;91:663–668. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kottuparambil S., Kim Y.-J., Choi H., Kim M.-S., Park A., Park J. A rapid phenol toxicity test based on photosynthesis and movement of the freshwater flagellate, Euglena agilis Carter. Aquatic Toxicol. 2014;155:9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krastanov A., Alexieva Z., Yemendzhiev H. Microbial degradation of phenol and phenolic derivatives. Eng. Life Sci. 2013;13(1):76–87. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuffner M., Puschenreiter M., Wieshammer G., Gorfer M., Sessitsch A. Rhizosphere bacteria affect growth and metal uptake of heavy metal accumulating willows. Plant Soil. 2008;304:35–44. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kyambadde J., Kansiime F., Dalhammar G. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal in substrate-free pilot constructed wetlands with horizontal surface flow in Uganda. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005;165:37–59. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li Y.H., Liu Q.F., Liu Y., Zhu J.N., Zhang Q. Endophytic bacterial diversity in roots of Typha angustifolia L. in the constructed Beijing Cuihu Wetland (China) Res. Microbiol. 2011;162:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li Y.H., Zhu J.N., Zhai Z.H., Zhang Q. Endophytic bacterial diversity in roots of Phragmites australis in constructed Beijing Cuihu Wetland (China) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010;309:84–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu J., Wang R., Huang B., Lin C., Wang Y., Pan X. Distribution and bioaccumulation of steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in wild fish species from Dianchi Lake. China. Environmen. Pollut. 2011;159:2815–2822. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu J., Wang R., Huang B., Lin C., Zhou J., Pan X. Biological effects and bioaccumulation of steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in high-back crucian carp exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ. Pollut. 2012;162:325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu Z., Xie W., Li D., Peng Y., Li Z., Liu S. Biodegradation of phenol by bacteria strain Acinetobacter calcoaceticus PA isolated from phenolic wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2016;13(3):300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lynch J., Fox L.J., Owen J.S., Jr, Sample D.J. Evaluation of commercial floating treatment wetland technologies for nutrient remediation of stormwater. Ecol. Eng. 2015;75:61–69. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mehmood R., Riaz M., Does R.J. Control charts for location based on different sampling schemes. J. Appl. Statist. 2013;40(3):483–494. [Google Scholar]
  41. Morris C.E., Monier J.-M. The ecological significance of biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003;41:429–453. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.022103.134521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Newman L.A., Reynolds C.M. Bacteria and phytoremediation: new uses for endophytic bacteria in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:6–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Patil G.P., Sinha A.K., Taillie C. 5 Ranked set sampling. Handbook Statis. 1994;12:167–200. [Google Scholar]
  44. Phenrat T., Teeratitayangkul P., Prasertsung I., Parichatprecha R., Jitsangiam P., Chomchalow N. Vetiver plantlets in aerated system degrade phenol in illegally dumped industrial wastewater by phytochemical and rhizomicrobial degradation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:13235–13246. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7707-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Plotkin, J.S., 2016. What's New in Phenol Production? Industrial Chemistry and Engineering. 2017. American Chemical Society, American Chemical Society, 2016.
  46. Riaz L., Mahmood T., Coyne M.S., Khalid A., Rashid A., Hayat M.T. Physiological and antioxidant response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Chemosphere. 2017;177:250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saleem H. Plant-bacteria partnership: phytoremediation of hydrocarbons contaminated soil and expression of catabolic genes. Bull. Environ. Stud. 2016;1(Jan):19. [Google Scholar]
  48. Saleem H., Rehman K., Arslan M., Afzal M., (In Press). Enhanced degradation of phenol in floating treatment wetlands by plant-bacterial synergism, Int. J. Phytorem. [DOI] [PubMed]
  49. Saravanakumar D., Kavino M., Raguchander T., Subbian P., Samiyappan R. Plant growth promoting bacteria enhance water stress resistance in green gram plants. Acta Physiol. Plantarum. 2011;33:203–209. [Google Scholar]
  50. Schröder P., Daubner D., Maier H., Neustifter J., Debus R. Phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics–Glutathione dependent detoxification in Phragmites plants from European treatment sites. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99:7183–7191. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stefanakis A.I., Thullner M. Fate of Phenolic Compounds in Constructed Wetlands Treating Contaminated Water. In: Ansari A.A., Gill S.S., Gill R., Lanza G.R., Newman L., editors. Volume 4. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2016. pp. 311–325. (Phytoremediation: Management of Environmental Contaminants). [Google Scholar]
  52. Syranidou, E., Christofilopoulos, S., Kalogerakis, N., 2016. Juncus spp.—The helophyte for all (phyto) remediation purposes? New biotechnology. [DOI] [PubMed]
  53. Tatoulis, T., Stefanakis, A.I., Akratos, C.S., Terkerlekopoulou, A., Gianni, A., Zacharias, I., et al., 2015. Treatment of agro-industrial wastewaters using novel horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands. In: 6th International Symposium on Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control, York, UK. pp. 13–18.
  54. Trivedy, R.K., Goel, P.K., 1984. Chemical and Biological Methods for Water Pollution Studies. Environmental Publications.
  55. Ucisik A.S., Trapp S. Uptake, removal, accumulation, and phytotoxicity of phenol in willow trees (Salix viminalis) Environm. Toxicol. Chem. 2006;25:2455–2460. doi: 10.1897/05-457r.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. USEPA, 1979. Phenol ambient water quality criteria. Office of the planning and standards. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. pp. 296–386.
  57. Vacca G., Wand H., Nikolausz M., Kuschk P., Kästner M. Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water Res. 2005;39:1361–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Van der Werff M. Common reed. Ecolog. Responses Environ. Stresses. 1991:172–182. [Google Scholar]
  59. van Schie P.M., Young L.Y. Biodegradation of phenol: mechanisms and applications. Biorem. J. 2000;4:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;45:61–69. doi: 10.1021/es101403q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vymazal J. The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen removal: a review of a recent development. Water Res. 2013;47:4795–4811. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang C.-Y., Sample D.J., Day S.D., Grizzard T.J. Floating treatment wetland nutrient removal through vegetation harvest and observations from a field study. Ecol. Eng. 2015;78:15–26. [Google Scholar]
  63. Weragoda S.K., Jinadasa K., Zhang D.Q., Gersberg R.M., Tan S.K., Tanaka N. Tropical application of floating treatment wetlands. Wetlands. 2012;32:955–961. [Google Scholar]
  64. Weyens N., van der Lelie D., Taghavi S., Vangronsveld J. Phytoremediation: plant–endophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009;20:248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. White S.A., Cousins M.M. Floating treatment wetland aided remediation of nitrogen and phosphorus from simulated stormwater runoff. Ecol. Eng. 2013;61:207–215. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wu Y., Li T., Yang L. Mechanisms of removing pollutants from aqueous solutions by microorganisms and their aggregates: a review. Bioresource Technol. 2012;107:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yeh N., Yeh P., Chang Y.-H. Artificial floating islands for environmental improvement. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015;47:616–622. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES