Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: WMJ. 2018 Oct;117(4):149–155.

Table 3.

Barriers Affecting Routine LARC Provision “Quite a Bit” or “a Great Deal,” Among Wisconsin Providers Who Report Providing Contraceptive Carea

Ob-gyn
(n = 438)
Midwifery
(n = 119)
Family Medicine
(n = 277)
Pediatrics
(n = 122)
P-valueb
Lack of skill in insertion 1.8% 10.9% 31.1% 72.1% <.0001
Lack of familiarity with 2.5% 7.6% 9.4% 17.2% <.0001
insurance policies
Cost of device 5.0% 14.3% 10.8% 10.7% .002
Challenges with reimbursement 4.1% 16.0% 8.7% 10.7% <.0001
Personal or religious beliefs 0.7% 3.4% 2.5% 3.3% .08
Low patient interest 5.3% 10.1% 13.4% 27.1% <.0001
Lack of eligible patients 3.4% 1.7% 7.9% 12.3% <.0001
Lack of time for counseling 0.9% 0.8% 2.2% 9.0% <.0001
Lack of time for procedure 0.9% 0.8% 4.3% 13.9% <.0001
Devices not available on-site 4.8% 17.7% 12.3% 29.5% <.0001
Separate visit required for insertion 3.0% 10.1% 9.8% 21.3% <.0001

Abbreviations: LARC, Long-acting reversible contraceptive; Ob-gyn, includes obstetrician-gynecologists and advanced practice providers working in Ob-gyn or women’s health.

a

Providers who answered zero LARC barriers (n = 36) were excluded from this analysis.

b

Chi-square test of difference by specialty.