Skip to main content
Cardiology Research and Practice logoLink to Cardiology Research and Practice
. 2019 Aug 28;2019:3849547. doi: 10.1155/2019/3849547

Erratum to “Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation”

Helder Pereira 1,2,, Tom A Jackson 1,3, Simon Claridge 1,3, Jonathan M Behar 1,3, Cheng Yao 4, Benjamin Sieniewicz 1,3, Justin Gould 1,3, Bradley Porter 1,3, Baldeep Sidhu 1,3, Jaswinder Gill 3, Steven Niederer 1, Christopher A Rinaldi 3
PMCID: PMC6735176  PMID: 31559094

In the article titled “Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation” [1], there was an error in Figure 1, where Figures 1(a) and 1(b) were duplicated, due to a production error. The corrected figure is shown below.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

VaT10-90 and TVaT values in each patient according to the VVD setting. LVx, intraventricular pacing interval with the left ventricle paced first by x milliseconds; RVx, intraventricular pacing interval with the right ventricle paced first by x milliseconds; SIM, intraventricular pacing interval with the right and left ventricles paced simultaneously; TVaT, total ventricular activation time; VaT10-90, ventricular activation time 10–90.

References

  • 1.Pereira H., Jackson T. A., Claridge S., et al. Comparison of Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Mapping for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Optimisation. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2019;2019:9. doi: 10.1155/2019/4351693.4351693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cardiology Research and Practice are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES