Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
. 2019 Jun 3;104(10):4600–4606. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00530

Association Between Statin Use and Sex Hormone in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Cohort

Oludamilola W Oluleye 1, Richard A Kronmal 2, Aaron R Folsom 3, Dhananjay M Vaidya 4, Pamela Ouyang 4, Daniel A Duprez 5, Adrian S Dobs 4, Hirad Yarmohammadi 6, Suma H Konety 5,
PMCID: PMC6736052  PMID: 31157875

Abstract

Purpose

Based on the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines, the number of individuals eligible for statin therapy to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk has greatly expanded. Statins inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis, which can impair gonadal steroidogenesis. We evaluated the effect of statins on endogenous sex hormones in a large epidemiological study.

Methods

A total of 6814 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) participants underwent the baseline examination. Of these, 6171 had measurements of serum sex hormones available: dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), SHBG, estradiol, and total and bioavailable testosterone. Multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the relationship of statin use with each sex hormone.

Results

A total of 345 women (17.4%) and 464 men (14.7%) were statin users (mean age, 67 years; 41% white, 29% black, 11% Chinese, and 19% Hispanic). Among the users vs nonusers of statins, the mean SHBG was 3.54 nmol/L (P < 0.01) lower in women and 3.37 nmol/L (P < 0.001) lower in men; the mean DHEA was 1.06 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower in women and 0.70 nmol/L (P < 0.01) lower in men, after adjustment for potential confounders. With further propensity score adjustment, the mean DHEA and SHBG levels were 0.67 nmol/L (P < 0.05) and 3.49 nmol/L (P < 0.001) lower, respectively, for statin users vs nonusers. No statistically significant association was noted between estradiol, total testosterone, and bioavailable testosterone and statin use.

Conclusion

Statin users have lower levels of SHBG and DHEA. This is especially relevant owing to the increasing use of statin therapy.


The use of statins for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease can impair gonadal steroidogenesis.


The 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol guidelines recommend statin therapy to reduce risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (1). Using these guidelines, many older subjects have qualified for the initiation and continuation of statin therapy (2–4). A recent Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study showed that the number of participants eligible for statin therapy doubled using the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines compared with the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Program III guidelines (5). Once initiated, statins are generally indicated throughout an individual’s life until we have data to indicate a more appropriate length of treatment. Cholesterol is a required intermediate in sex steroid synthesis. With the increased use of statins, especially moderate- and high-intensity statin therapy, concern has been raised regarding impaired gonadal steroidogenesis. This might be related to inhibition of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase enzymes in the steroid pathway or due to reduced circulating cholesterol.

The effect of statins on endogenous sex hormones has been studied in some small clinical trials but with inconsistent results (6–11). Similarly, observational studies have provided heterogeneous results on sex hormone levels with the use of statin therapy (12–14). The characteristics of both experimental and observational studies of statins and sex hormones are summarized in Table 1. These studies were limited by small sample sizes and did not thoroughly accounted for potential confounders.

Table 1.

Summary of Studies on Sex Hormone Concentrations Stratified by Statin Use

Sex Hormone Statin Men Women References
Overall Experimental Observational
DHEA Atorvastatin 13
Pravastatin 12, 31, 32 12, 31 32
Pravastatin 9 9
Simvastatin NA 29 29
Statin use NA 14 14
SHBG Pravastatin 29 29
Simvastatin NA 10, 31, 32 10, 31,32
Statin use NA 14 14
Total testosterone Atorvastatin NA 13 13
Pravastatin 9, 12, 29, 31,32 9,12, 29, 31 32
Simvastatin NA 10, 31 10 31
Lovastatin NA 11, 13 11, 13
Statin use NA 14, 15 14, 15
Bioavailable testosterone Simvastatin NA 31 31
Simvastatin NA 10 10
E2 Pravastatin 31, 32 31 32
Simvastatin NA 29, 31 29 31
Statin use 15, 16 15, 16

Abbreviations: ↓, a decrease in the hormone; ↔, no change in the hormone; NA, not available.

Therefore, to better characterize the association of statin therapy with serum sex hormone levels, we undertook the present cross-sectional study in the population-based MESA cohort.

Methods

Study population

The MESA design has been described previously (15). In brief, MESA was a population-based study of 6814 white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese participants, aged 45 to 84 years without clinical cardiovascular disease, who had been recruited from 2000 to 2002. The participants lived in six US communities: Baltimore, MD; Chicago, IL; Forsyth County, NC; Los Angeles County, CA; northern Manhattan, NY; and St. Paul, MN. Each participant had provided informed consent, and the institutional review board of the individual institutions had approved the study.

Study variables

Serum sex hormones

A total of 6814 MESA participants had undergone the baseline examination. Of these, 6171 had measurements of the serum sex hormones available: dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), SHBG, estradiol (E2), and total and bioavailable testosterone. Excluded from the analyses were 1021 women receiving hormone replacement therapy, for a resulting analysis data set of 1987 women and 3163 men.

Fasting blood samples taken between 7:30 am and 10:30 am were used for the assays. Serum samples were extracted by centrifugation at 2000g for 15 minutes or 3000g for 10 minutes and stored at −70°C. The serum hormone concentrations were measured at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center (Worcester, MA).

SHBG was measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay using Immulite kits (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). The RIA kit was used to measure DHEA and total testosterone directly. E2 was measured using an ultrasensitive RIA kit (Beckman Coulter, Webster, TX). Bioavailable testosterone was calculated using the method reported by Vermeulen et al. (16) The intra-assay coefficients of variation for SHBG, DHEA, total testosterone, and E2 were 9.0%, 11.2%, 12.3%, and 10.5%, respectively.

Statin therapy

Statin medication type, frequency, and dosages during the 2-week period before the baseline visit were determined by participant self-report and a review of the pharmacy containers the participants had brought to the examinations. Statin use was defined as having brought in a container indicating the use of a statin drug.

Covariates

The following self-reported covariates were evaluated: age, sex, and race/ethnicity (i.e., white, black, Hispanic, Chinese). The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride measurements were performed at the Collaborative Studies Clinical Laboratory at Fairview University Medical Center (Minneapolis, MN) from blood samples obtained after the participants had fasted for 12 hours. Diabetes was defined as fasting blood glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL), self-reported diabetes, or the use of hypoglycemic drugs. Hypertension was defined as untreated diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, or the use of antihypertensive medication. Smoking was defined as the current use of cigarettes.

Statistical analysis

We have reported the mean for the continuous variables and counts with percentages for the categorical variables. Sex-specific multivariable linear regression models were used to assess the association of statin use with the serum concentrations of each sex hormone. Although the recent ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines have recommended the use of statins for patients with diabetes, this was not a guideline indication for statin use in 2000 to 2002 when the MESA participants were recruited (17). However, the overall metabolic picture associated with diabetes might be the sort of background in which clinicians could have been motivated to prescribe statins on their own. Therefore, to reduce confounding by indication, regression analyses were performed with inclusion of an estimate of the propensity for statin use (18). Three regression models were performed. Model 1 was adjusted for age and race. Model 2 was also adjusted for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, BMI, and diabetes. Because no significant interaction use was found between sex and statin use, for both DHEA and SHBG levels, the women and men were pooled into a single sample for the regression analyses adjusting for the propensity score. The models for total testosterone and bioavailable testosterone were for men only and the model for estradiol was for women only, adjusting for the propensity score. Additional regression models were performed stratified by statin type to explore the association of SHBG with glucose and insulin levels in those without diabetes (19). The natural log insulin and glucose levels were used, because the data were skewed. Patients with diabetes were excluded from this analysis, because the treatment of diabetes has major effects on both glucose and insulin levels. P values < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. All analyses were performed using Stata, version 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Results

The mean age of the participants receiving statin therapy was 67 years; 57% were men, 26% had diabetes, 41% were white, 29% were black, 11% were Chinese, and 19% were Hispanic (Table 2). The total testosterone levels in men and the SHBG and DHEA levels in both men and postmenopausal women were inversely associated with statin use, even after multivariate adjustment (P < 0.05; Table 3). For the statin users compared with the nonusers of statins, the mean SHBG was 3.54 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower in women and 3.37 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower in men, or approximately one fifth of 1 SD less. Similarly, the mean DHEA was 1.06 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower in the women and 0.70 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower in the men, or approximately one tenth of 1 SD less, among the statin users compared with the nonusers of statins. In addition, total testosterone was 0.81 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower in the male statin users compared with the nonusers. No significant association was noted between statin use and E2 or bioavailable testosterone among either women or men. Although the propensity score analysis to some degree attenuated the association of DHEA with statin use, the inverse association of SHBG levels with statin use remained strong. The DHEA level was 0.67 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower and the mean SHBG level was 3.47 nmol/L (P < 0.05) lower, no significant association was found for total testosterone in men among statin users compared with nonusers (Table 4).

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of MESA Participants According to Statin Use

Characteristic Statin Use
Yes (n = 809) No (n = 4329)
Age, y 66.7 ± 9 62.9 ± 11
Men, n (%) 464 (57) 2692 (62)
Race, n (%)
 White 331 (41) 1498 (35)
 Black 232 (29) 1198 (28)
 Hispanic 154 (19) 1060 (25)
 Chinese 92 (11) 573 (13)
BMI, kg/m2 29 ± 5 28 ± 5
Diabetes classification, n (%)
 Normal 321 (40) 2401 (56)
 Impaired glucose intolerance 278 (34) 1325 (31)
 Untreated diabetes 35 (4) 211 (5)
 Treated diabetes 175 (22) 386 (9)
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 180 ± 34 196 ± 36
HDL-C, mg/dL 49 ± 13 49 ± 15
DHEA, nmol/L
 Women 10.5 ± 5.5 12.5 ± 6.4
 Men 12.1 ± 6 14.4 ± 7.9
SHBG, nmol/L
 Women 55.3 ± 28 56.5 ± 30
 Men 43.2 ± 16 44.6 ± 20
Bioavailable testosterone, nmol/L
 Women 0.33 ± 0.4 0.33 ± 0.3
 Men 5.23 ± 3.0 5.48 ± 4.9
E2, nmol/L
 Women 0.10 ± 0.06 0.10 ± 0.06
 Men 0.12 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.05

Data presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables.

Abbreviation: HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 3.

Linear Regression for Sex-Specific Estimated Mean Concentration Differences of Endogenous Sex Hormones Stratified by Statin Use

Hormone Women Men
Coefficient 95% CI P Value Coefficient 95% CI P Value
DHEA, nmol/L
 Model 1 −1.33 −2.04 to −0.61 < 0.0001 −1.13 −1.82 to −0.44 0.001
 Model 2 −1.06 −1.80 to −0.32 0.005 −0.70 −1.41 to 0.01 0.05
SHBG to nmol/L
 Model 1 −4.00 −7.22 to −0.79 0.01 −3.54 −5.36 to −1.72 < 0.0001
 Model 2 −3.54 −6.58 to −0.49 0.02 −3.37 −5.14 to −1.60 < 0.0001
Total testosterone, nmol/L
 Model 1 −0.01 −0.13 to 0.10 0.80 −0.81 −1.36 to −0.26 < 0.005
 Model 2 −0.02 −0.14 to 0.09 0.73 −0.52 −1.06 to 0.02 0.06
Bioavailable testosterone, nmol/L
 Model 1 0.01 −0.03 to 0.05 0.52 0.03 −0.23 to 0.17 0.76
 Model 2 0.01 −0.03 to 0.05 0.80 0.08 −0.12 to 0.28 0.45
E2, nmol/L
 Model 1 −0.00 −0.01 to 0.01 0.62 0.00 −0.00 to 0.01 0.76
 Model 2 −0.01 −0.01 to 0.00 0.12 0.00 −0.00 to 0.01 0.71

Model 1, race and age adjusted; Model 2: model 1 adjustments plus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, BMI, diabetes, cigarette use, hypertension medication use, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Table 4.

Linear Regression for Estimated Mean Concentration Differences of Endogenous Sex Hormones Stratified by Statin Use and Adjusted for Model 2 Variables and Propensity Score

Hormone Coefficient 95% CI P Value
DHEA, nmol/L −0.67 −1.31 to −0.02 0.04
SHBG, nmol/L −3.49 −6.14 to −2.21 < 0.0001
Total testosterone, nmol/L (men) 0.58 −1.24 to 0.07 0.08
Bioavailable testosterone, nmol/L (men) 0.07 −0.18 to 0.32 0.58
E2, nmol/L (women) −0.01 −0.02 to 0.00 0.20

The models for total testosterone and bioavailable testosterone were for men only and the model for E2 was for women only; the models for DHEA and SHBG were for the entire sample, with sex included in the adjustment variables.

Among the statin users, 7.5% were taking atorvastatin, 4.8% were taking simvastatin, and 2% were taking pravastatin (19). After adjustment, no statistically significant evidence was found that a specific statin drug was consistently related to any of the sex hormones (19). Furthermore, a strong negative association was found between the glucose and SHBG levels in men and women and insulin levels in women (19).

Discussion

The key finding of our cross-sectional epidemiological study was the lower levels of serum sex hormone concentrations in statin users compared with nonusers of statins. A significant inverse association of statin use was found with SHBG levels among statin users compared with nonusers of statin. In both men and women, this inverse association remained statistically significant even after controlling for BMI, diabetes, and other covariates. To eliminate confounding by indication, we also conducted a propensity score analysis but did not find meaningful changes to the SHBG results.

In a clinical trial of men with hyperlipidemia who had been randomized to receive simvastatin 80 mg or placebo, Dobs et al. (7) concluded that statin therapy had no effect on SHBG levels. A reduction of −0.08% of SHBG was found in the simvastatin group at 12 weeks compared with baseline but the difference did not meet statistical significance. This likely resulted from the small sample size (n = 37), which provided little power to detect a difference; thus, these results were inconclusive (7). Our findings concur with the findings from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of men with hypercholesterolemia in which the investigators noted a small, but significant, reduction in SHBG for the simvastatin 20-mg group compared with placebo after 24 weeks of treatment (8). Our findings are also consistent with the results from the BACH (Boston Area Community Health) survey, an epidemiological study, which showed 11% lower SHBG levels among statin users compared with nonusers of statins (12).

Moreover, endogenous sex hormones might differentially modulate glycemic status and the risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. High testosterone levels have been associated with a greater risk of type 2 diabetes in women but a lower risk in men. The risk of type 2 diabetes is lower with greater levels of SHBG, with this inverse association stronger in women than in men (20). Our data showing a strong negative association of glucose with SHBG in men and women is consistent with this finding. Genetic studies have strengthened the evidence that SHBG and sex hormones are involved in the etiology of type 2 diabetes (21, 22). This is of particular interest given the data from both observational studies and randomized statin trials that incident diabetes increased with statin use (23–25).

Statin use was also associated with lower levels of DHEA, in both men and women, in our study. DHEA is one of the major hormones secreted by the adrenal gland, and it declines linearly with age (26). Our finding is consistent with a previous study by Dobs et al. (6), which showed lower levels of DHEA with pravastatin use. A study by Hall et al. (12) demonstrated lower levels of DHEA with statin use in older men but not in younger individuals. A meta-analysis by Yang et al. (27) also indicated that statins significantly reduced the levels of DHEA compared with placebo in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. A study evaluating testicular function in men with hypercholesterolemia after simvastatin therapy did not reveal any variations in the DHEA levels (28). DHEA has been associated with an increased risk of impaired fasting glucose in postmenopausal women (29), although no such association has been noted in men.

Statin use was associated with lower total testosterone levels in men. However, after propensity score analysis, the association was not statistically significant. Changes in bioavailable testosterone correlated highly with changes in total testosterone (30). Cholesterol is the main substrate for androgen synthesis of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and a reduction in cholesterol might ultimately affect these levels (12). However, a number of studies have evaluated the association of statin use and testosterone levels and yielded null results. Our findings concur with observational studies, including the BACH survey and the NHANES III (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), which found no cross-sectional association between statin use and total testosterone levels in men (12, 13). Similarly, clinical trials have shown that statin use had no significant effect on total testosterone levels (8, 9, 11).

We observed no association between statin use and E2 levels, consistent with the results from previous studies. The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study enrolled 453 women in the pre, peri-, and postmenopausal stages and assessed the reproductive hormone levels after the initiation of statins (14). They found no significant differences in the E2 levels with statin use (14). Another study of peri- and postmenopausal women revealed no changes in E2 levels after 5 years of pravastatin treatment compared with nonusers of statin (31).

The strengths of the present study included the large population-based, ethnically and racially diverse cohort without clinical cardiovascular disease at baseline and the use of a central research laboratory for the hormone measurements. In addition, we were able to reduce confounding by indication by including in our regression models an estimate of the probability (propensity) that a participant would have been prescribed a statin. Another limitation of our study was that the sex hormones were only measured at a single time point, which might not reflect usual levels, given the significant biological variability in serum hormone concentrations over time. However, this type of variability has typically tended to weaken observed associations. The sex hormone levels could also vary by statin type or dose, which was not adjusted for. In our study, the number of participants using specific statins was inadequate to investigate these effects. In addition, the present study was a cross-sectional study with the usual limitations of all epidemiological studies and the inability to determine the time effects of statin use (e.g., when the participant had started taking the statin was not known).

Conclusion

In the present cross-sectional study, the SHBG and DHEA levels in both men and women were inversely associated with statin use. These changes give insight into other pathways affected by statins and might necessitate monitoring of sex hormone levels during statin therapy. Further prospective studies or clinical trials will be relevant to elucidate this.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the other investigators, staff, and participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of the participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org.

Financial Support: Measurement of the hormone concentrations was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grants R01-HL-074406 and R01-HL-074338), and MESA was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Contracts HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, and N01-HC-95169).

Glossary

Abbreviations:

ACC

American College of Cardiology

AHA

American Heart Association

BMI

body mass index

DHEA

dehydroepiandrosterone

E2

estradiol

MESA

Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Additional Information

Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Data Availability:

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed in the present study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References and Notes

  • 1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC Jr, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines [published online ahead of print 3 November 2018]. Circulation. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ridker PM, Cook NR. Statins: new American guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2013;382(9907):1762–1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Muntner P, Safford MM, Cushman M, Howard G. Comment on the reports of over-estimation of ASCVD risk using the 2013 AHA/ACC risk equation. Circulation. 2014;129(2):266–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lenzer J. Majority of panelists on controversial new cholesterol guideline have current or recent ties to drug manufacturers. BMJ. 2013:347:f6989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB Sr, Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O’Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PWF. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2935–2959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dobs AS, Sarma PS, Schteingart D. Long-term endocrine function in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with pravastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. Metabolism. 1993;42(9):1146–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dobs AS, Schrott H, Davidson MH, Bays H, Stein EA, Kush D, Wu M, Mitchel Y, Illingworth RD. Effects of high-dose simvastatin on adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis in men with hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 2000;49(9):1234–1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dobs AS, Miller S, Neri G, Weiss S, Tate AC, Shapiro DR, Musliner TA. Effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on gonadal function in male hypercholesterolemic patients. Metabolism. 2000;49(1):115–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mastroberardino G, Costa C, Gavelli MS, Vitaliano E, Rossi F, Catalano A, Barletta R, Guarini G. Plasma cortisol and testosterone in hypercholesterolaemia treated with clofibrate and lovastatin. J Int Med Res. 1989;17(4):388–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Böhm M, Herrmann W, Wassmann S, Laufs U, Nickenig G. Does statin therapy influence steroid hormone synthesis? Z Kardiol. 2004;93(1):43–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Farnsworth WH, Hoeg JM, Maher M, Brittain EH, Sherins RJ, Brewer HB Jr. Testicular function in type II hyperlipoproteinemic patients treated with lovastatin (mevinolin) or neomycin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;65(3):546–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hall SA, Page ST, Travison TG, Montgomery RB, Link CL, McKinlay JB. Do statins affect androgen levels in men? Results from the Boston Area Community Health survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(8):1587–1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mondul AM, Selvin E, Rohrmann S, Menke A, Feinleib M, Kanarek N, Rifai N, Dobs AS, Platz EA. Association of serum cholesterol and cholesterol-lowering drug use with serum sex steroid hormones in men in NHANES III. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(10):1575–1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bairey Merz CN, Olson MB, Johnson BD, Bittner V, Hodgson TK, Berga SL, Braunstein GD, Pepine CJ, Reis SE, Sopko G, Kelsey SF; Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Cholesterol-lowering medication, cholesterol level, and reproductive hormones in women: the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Am J Med. 2002;113(9):723–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob DR Jr, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O’Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(9):871–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM. A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(10):3666–3672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. National Cholesterol Education Program. Report of the Expert Panel on Population Strategies for Blood Cholesterol Reduction: executive summary. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(6):1071–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jorgensen NW, Sibley CT, McClelland RL. Using imputed pre-treatment cholesterol in a propensity score model to reduce confounding by indication: results from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Oluleye OW, Kronmal RA, Folsom AR, Vaidya DM, Ouyang P, Duprez DA, Dobs AS, Yarmohammadi H, Konety SH. Data from: Association between statin use and sex hormone in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. figshare 2019. Deposited 17 May 2019. https://figshare.com/s/5203cde2d90140d6d4fe. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20. Ding EL, Song Y, Malik VS, Liu S. Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(11):1288–1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Perry JRB, Weedon MN, Langenberg C, Jackson AU, Lyssenko V, Sparsø T, Thorleifsson G, Grallert H, Ferrucci L, Maggio M, Paolisso G, Walker M, Palmer CNA, Payne F, Young E, Herder C, Narisu N, Morken MA, Bonnycastle LL, Owen KR, Shields B, Knight B, Bennett A, Groves CJ, Ruokonen A, Jarvelin MR, Pearson E, Pascoe L, Ferrannini E, Bornstein SR, Stringham HM, Scott LJ, Kuusisto J, Nilsson P, Neptin M, Gjesing AP, Pisinger C, Lauritzen T, Sandbaek A, Sampson M, Zeggini E, Lindgren CM, Steinthorsdottir V, Thorsteinsdottir U, Hansen T, Schwarz P, Illig T, Laakso M, Stefansson K, Morris AD, Groop L, Pedersen O, Boehnke M, Barroso I, Wareham NJ, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI, Frayling TM; MAGIC. Genetic evidence that raised sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(3):535–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ding EL, Song Y, Manson JE, Hunter DJ, Lee CC, Rifai N, Buring JE, Gaziano JM, Liu S. Sex hormone-binding globulin and risk of type 2 diabetes in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1152–1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Glynn RJ; JUPITER Study Group. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195–2207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, de Craen AJ, Seshasai SR, McMurray JJ, Freeman DJ, Jukema JW, Macfarlane PW, Packard CJ, Stott DJ, Westendorp RG, Shepherd J, Davis BR, Pressel SL, Marchioli R, Marfisi RM, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, Tognoni G, Kjekshus J, Pedersen TR, Cook TJ, Gotto AM, Clearfield MB, Downs JR, Nakamura H, Ohashi Y, Mizuno K, Ray KK, Ford I. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375(9716):735–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kohli P, Waters DD, Nemr R, Arsenault BJ, Messig M, DeMicco DA, Laskey R, Kastelein JJP. Risk of new-onset diabetes and cardiovascular risk reduction from high-dose statin therapy in pre-diabetics and non-pre-diabetics: an analysis from TNT and IDEAL. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(4):402–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Orentreich N, Brind JL, Rizer RL, Vogelman JH. Age changes and sex differences in serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations throughout adulthood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;59(3):551–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yang S, Gu YY, Jing F, Yu CX, Guan QB. The effect of statins on levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:590–597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Azzarito C, Boiardi L, Vergoni W, Zini M, Portioli I. Testicular function in hypercholesterolemic male patients during prolonged simvastatin treatment. Horm Metab Res. 1996;28:193–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Golden SH, Dobs AS, Vaidya D, Szklo M, Gapstur S, Kopp P, Liu K, Ouyang P. Endogenous sex hormones and glucose tolerance status in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(4):1289–1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kapoor D, Aldred H, Clark S, Channer KS, Jones TH. Clinical and biochemical assessment of hypogonadism in men with type 2 diabetes: correlations with bioavailable testosterone and visceral adiposity. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(4):911–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ushiroyama T, Ikeda A, Ueki M. Beneficial effects of pravastatin in peri- and postmenopausal hyperlipidemic women: a 5-year study on serum lipid and sex hormone levels. Maturitas. 2001;37(3):201–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed in the present study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES