Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Sep 10;9:12991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49417-1

Endemic diversity and distribution of the Iranian vascular flora across phytogeographical regions, biodiversity hotspots and areas of endemism

Jalil Noroozi 1,✉, Amir Talebi 2, Moslem Doostmohammadi 2, Sara Manafzadeh 1, Zahra Asgarpour 1, Gerald M Schneeweiss 1
PMCID: PMC6737179  PMID: 31506504

Abstract

Endemism is one of the most important concepts in biogeography and is of high relevance for conservation biology. Nevertheless, our understanding of patterns of endemism is still limited in many regions of high biodiversity. This is also the case for Iran, which is rich in biodiversity and endemism, but there is no up-to-date account of diversity and distribution of its endemic species. In this study, a comprehensive list of all endemic vascular plant species of Iran, their taxonomic composition and their geographical distribution are presented. To this end, a total of 2,597 (sub)endemic vascular plant species of Iran were documented and their distribution in three phytogeographical regions, two biodiversity hotspots and five areas of endemism were analysed. The Irano-Turanian phytogeographical region harbours 88% of the Iranian endemics, the majority of which are restricted to the Irano-Anatolian biodiversity hotspot (84%). Nearly three quarters of the endemic species are restricted to mountain ranges. The rate of endemism increases along an elevational gradient, causing the alpine zone to harbour a disproportionally high number of endemics. With increasing pastoralism, urbanization, road construction and ongoing climate change, the risk of biodiversity loss in the Iranian mountains is very high, and these habitats need to be more effectively protected.

Subject terms: Biodiversity, Conservation biology, Plant ecology, Biogeography

Introduction

The concept of endemism, which describes that a taxon is restricted in its distribution to a distinct area, is central in biogeography1. It is also considered a significant criterion for biodiversity conservation at the global, national and local scales2–4. Biodiversity is unevenly distributed both around the Earth and among the different lineages of the tree of life5,6. Areas with high concentration of narrowly distributed species are of high priority to preserve biodiversity3,7, and identification of areas with high priority for conservation is a fundamental task of conservation biogeography8,9. The number of endemic species in a biogeographic region is a first step for assessing the conservation situation of that region10. Documenting endemic richness in a biodiversity hotspot or area of endemism is important not only for setting their conservation priorities11, but also for understanding the evolutionary and ecological processes that have shaped the biodiversity hotspots in general and areas of endemism in particular12,13.

This study focuses on Iran, a vast country in Southwest Asia (Fig. 1a) with very diverse landscapes14–16 comprising a large number of arid to semi-arid mountain ranges. It is home to a high plant and animal diversity with more than 8,000 vascular plant taxa, approximately 30% of which are endemics17, and more than 1,000 species of mainland vertebrates14. Moreover, Iran is at the crossroads of three major phytogeographic regions (the Irano-Turanian, the Saharo-Sindian and the Euro-Siberian regions sensu White and Léonard18), covers parts of two global biodiversity hotspots, i.e. Irano-Anatolian and Caucasus7, and harbours five areas of endemism19. These areas of endemism are clearly associated with the major mountain ranges of the Iranian Plateau, harbouring the majority of the Iranian endemic flora19. The Iranian Plateau is one of the hotspots of evolutionary and biological diversity of the Old World and serves as a bridge for migration of many plants, connecting the eastern and western floras of Eurasia20. Despite its outstanding species richness, geographic extent, and evolutionary importance, and although it has been the object of several studies on endemism, diversity and chorology of plants17,21–32, there is no updated and comprehensive work available summarizing the diversity and distribution of endemic vascular flora in Iran as a whole, in its phytogeographical regions, in biodiversity hotspots and also in areas of endemism.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Global biodiversity hotspots, phytogeographic regions and areas of endemism in Iran. (a) Topographic map of Iran and adjacent regions showing the Irano-Anatolian and the Caucasus biodiversity hotspots. (b) Topographic map of Iran indicating phytogeographical regions (Irano-Turanian region indicated as yellow shaded area, the Saharo-Sindian region and the Euro-Siberian region indicated as unshaded areas south and north, respectively, of the Irano-Turanian region) and areas of endemism, well associated with high mountain ranges of Iran (indicated by outlines and their names).

In this study, we provide a complete and updated list of all endemic vascular plant species of Iran with their geographical distributions. Documenting all vascular plant species endemic to Iran, we can (1) uncover the taxonomic composition of the Iranian endemic flora, (2) estimate the number of Iranian endemics per phytogeographic region, biodiversity hotspot and area of endemism, (3) assess the floristic connections between areas of endemism, (4) quantify the contribution of large taxonomic groups to each area of endemism, (5) record the elevational distribution of endemic species, and finally (6) construct life form spectra in the biogeographical regions of Iran.

Results and Discussion

Taxonomic distribution of endemic diversity

The Iranian vascular flora includes a total of 2,597 endemic or subendemic species (32% of all native species), belonging to 359 genera within 65 families. There are no endemic families, but 26 endemic and subendemic genera (Table 1). Of those (sub)endemic genera, 19 are monotypic, two are ditypic and the remaining five multitypic. The highest number of (sub-)endemic genera is found in Apiaceae and Brassicaceae with 13 and 7 genera, respectively. However, data on endemic genera need to be viewed with caution because of uncertainty in taxonomic circumscription, for example generic re-alignments in Brassicaceae33–36 or addition of species to Parrotia37. Dicots contain 2,421 endemic species in Iran (93% of all vascular plant endemics) out of 6,889 species, monocots contain 175 endemics (7% of all vascular plant endemics) out of 1,164 species, and gymnosperms have only one endemic out of 10 species. None of the 53 pteridophyte species occurring in Iran is endemic. The percentage of endemism in dicots (35%) is much higher than in monocots (15%) and gymnosperms (10%). This likely is due to the high number of endemic species in a few eudicot genera, such as Astragalus (Fabaceae) and Cousinia (Astercaeae). The 10 largest families in terms of number of endemic species comprise 82% of the total Iranian endemic vascular flora (Fig. 2). Fabaceae is the number one in terms of endemic species (687 endemic species), which is due to the hyperdiverse genus Astragalus with ca. 800 species (70% endemics; Fig. 3), thus covering ca. 21% of the Iranian endemic vascular flora. The second largest family in terms of endemics is Asteraceae (Fig. 2), comprising 618 endemic species (48% of Asteraceae species). Cousinia is by far the largest genus of this family in Iran with 294 species (81% endemics; Fig. 3), encompassing 9% of the Iranian endemic species. Further families with high numbers of endemics are Lamiaceae (155), Apiaceae (127), Caryophyllaceae (127), Scrophulariaceae (96), Brassicaceae (88), Alliaceae (84), Boraginaceae (70), Rosaceae (69), and Plumbaginaceae (65; Fig. 2). Whereas these are all large families with respect to number of species present in Iran, Poaceae, which is the third biggest family in terms of total number of species (comprising 519 species) has only 28 endemic species (5%; Fig. 2). Although these numbers may decrease due to taxonomic revision27,38, new endemic species continue to be described17, rendering it unlikely that the overall pattern will change in the future.

Table 1.

Endemic genera of Iran. See text for details.

Genera Family Distribution AEa El. (m)b Phyto. regionc
Alococarpum Riedl & Kuber Apiaceae W/C Iran lod 1000–1500 ITe
Azilia Hedge & Lamond Apiaceae W Iran zaf 1800–2300 IT
Brossardia Boiss. Brassicaceae N Iraq, Iran za 1700–2500 IT
Clastopus Boiss. Brassicaceae W/N Iran alg, azh, za 2500–3700 IT
Demavendia Pimenov Apiaceae W/N/E/S Iran, S Turkmenistan al, za, kej, kok 1000–2500 IT
Dicyclophora Boiss. Apiaceae W/S Iran lo 50–1800 SSl
Diplotaenia Boiss. Apiaceae E Turkey, NW/N Iran, al, az 2500–3500 IT
Elburzia Hedge Brassicaceae N Iran al 2000–3000 IT
Ergocarpon C.C. Towns. Apiaceae E Iraq, Iran lo 200–700 SS
Haussknechtia Boiss. Apiaceae W Iran za 1700–2500 IT
Hymenocephalus Jaub. & Spach Asteraceae W Iran za ? IT
Jurinella Jaub. & Spach Asteraceae NE Iraq, E Turkey, S Transcaucasia, Caucasus, NW/N/NE Iran, al, az, ko 2500–4000 IT
Kalakia Alava Apiaceae NW/N Iran al, az 1000–2500 IT
Mozaffariania Pimenov & Maassoumi Apiaceae SE Iran lo 300–600 SS
Myopordon Boiss. Asteraceae W/N/S Iran al, za, ke, ko 3500–4000 IT
Opoidia Lindl. Apiaceae NE Iran ko 1500 IT
Opsicarpium Mozaff. Apiaceae W/NW Iran az, za 500–2300 IT
Phuopsis (Griseb.) Hook. f. Rubiaceae Talish, NW/N Iran al, az 500–2700 ESm
Physoptychis Boiss. Brassicaceae E Turkey, Transcaucasia, Iran al, az, za 2500–4500 IT
Pseudocamelina (Boiss.) N. Busch Brassicaceae W/NW/N/S Iran al, az, za, ke 1500–2500 IT
Pseudofortuynia Hedge Brassicaceae W/S Iran za, ke 1500–2500 IT
Sclerochorton Boiss. Apiaceae W Iran za 3000–3500 IT
Stenotaenia Boiss. Apiaceae W/NW/N Iran al, az, za 1800–3200 IT
Zerdana Boiss. Brassicaceae W/S Iran za, ke 3000–4000 IT
Zeugandra P.H. Davis Campanulaceae W Iran za 1500–2200 IT
Zhumeria Rech.f. & Wendelbo Lamiaceae S Iran lo 200–1500 SS
Open in a new tab

aArea of endemism; bElevation ranges (meter above sea level); cPhytogeographical regions; dLowland; eIrano-Turanian; fZagros; gAlborz; hAzerbaijan Plateau; jYazd-Kerman; kKopet Dagh-Khorassan; lShaharo-Sindian; mEuro-Siberian.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Number of endemic and non-endemic species in the 30 most endemic-rich families of the Iranian vascular flora (sorted by number of endemic species).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Number of endemic and non-endemic species of the 30 most endemic-rich genera of the Iranian vascular flora (sorted by number of endemic species).

The number of endemic species and the degree of endemism in the Iranian vascular flora is similar to Turkey, but twice that of Greece and the Iberian Peninsula (Table 2). Considering the smaller size of Turkey (about half of Iran), Turkey is proportionally richer than Iran. Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Caryophyllaceae and Brassicaceae are among the ten richest families in the Mediterranean countries and in Iran, but differ in their order (Table 3). In all five Mediterranean regions, Asteraceae contains the highest number of endemic species (Table 3), as is typical for non-tropical regions39, but in Iran the high diversity of Astragalus renders Fabaceae the most endemic-rich family.

Table 2.

Comparison of area size, total species richness and degree of endemism in the vascular flora of Iran versus other Mediterranean regions (Turkey, Greece, Italy, Iberian Peninsula, Morocco; data from Buira, et al.40).

Family Iran Turkey Greece Italy Iberian Peninsula Morocco
Area (km2) 1,648,195 783,562 131,957 301,338 588,824 446,550
Endemic genera 26 15 8 7 27 14
Total native species 8112 8575 5502 5935 5537 3913
Endemic species 2597(32%) 2651(31%) 1278(24%) 1050(18%) 1328(24%) 640(16%)
   No of families 65 63 53 52 63 54
   No. of genera 359 371 239 260 321 255
   Species/Genus 5.3 7.1 5.3 4 4.1 2.5
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

The eleven most endemic-rich families in the vascular flora of Iran and other Mediterranean regions (Turkey, Greece, Italy, Iberian Peninsula, Morocco; data from Buira, et al.40).

Family Iran Turkey Greece Italy Iberian Peninsula Morocco
Fabaceae 687 375 35 53 104 78
Asteraceae 618 430 204 221 203 131
Lamiaceae 155 240 68 20 108 80
Caryophyllaceae 127 187 96 72 92 35
Apiaceae 127 117 52 24 43 30
Scrophulariaceae 96 207 26 8 19 12
Brassicaceae 88 194 68 47 78 42
Alliaceae 84 50 47 18 8 2
Boraginaceae 70 108 35 21 22 12
Rosaceae 69 46 9 34 47 8
Plumbaginaceae 65 21 86 100 129 15
Open in a new tab

The ten richest genera in terms of endemic species account for 47% of the total number of endemics of Iran (Fig. 3). The largest genera of the vascular flora usually also comprise the largest number of endemic species (e.g., Astragalus, Cousinia, Allium). Exceptions are smaller genera with high proportion of endemics, such as Dionysia (Primulaceae) with 39 species and about 90% endemism (Fig. 3), and species-rich genera with few endemics, such as Carex, Trifolium, and Vicia, whose species tend to be widespread rendering those genera species-rich but endemic-poor also in other Mediterranean areas such as the Iberian Peninsula40.

Richness across the territories

The majority of the endemic vascular plant species of Iran (88%) are restricted to the Irano-Turanian region, whereas only 5% and 4% are restricted to the Saharo-Sindian and the Euro-Siberian regions, respectively; 3% is shared between the regions (Table 4). The Irano-Turanian region is richer than the two others, which is due to the size of this region as well as its topography, as it contains numerous mountain ranges, which generally are rich in endemics41,42. Some of the species-rich genera more strongly represented in this region are Astragalus (Fabaceae), Cousinia (Asteraceae), Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae) and Allium (Alliaceae; Fig. 4a). A typical representative of the Euro-Siberian region is Alchemilla (Rosaceae), with nearly 90% of its endemics being found in this region. Akhani, et al.43 suggests for the Hyrcanian forests (within the Euro-Siberian region) a number of ca. 280 endemic and subendemic species, which is almost three times more than we found (Table 4). As they do not provide any species list, we cannot assess the source for this discrepancy, but contributing factors may include the geographic coverage of the study by Akhani, et al.43 also including areas outside of Iran (southeastern Azerbaijan) or taxonomic differences, but still the discrepancy is remarkable. In the Saharo-Sindian region, the proportion of Echinops (Asteraceae) species is high compared to other regions (Fig. 4a).

Table 4.

Vascular plant endemism in the phytogeographical regions of Iran.

Phytogeographical region Region size (km2) Iranian endemic species Range-restricted endemic species Iranian endemic genera
Irano-Turanian 1,769,457 2289(88%) 1239(89%) 21
Saharo-Sindian 451,052 133(5%) 88(6%) 4
Euro-Siberian 80,317 101(4%) 56(4%) 1
Shared — 73(3%) — —
Open in a new tab

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Distribution of endemic vascular plant species (total and in the 10 most endemic-rich genera) across (a) phytogeographical regions and (b) areas of endemism.

Patterns of endemism in global biodiversity hotspots present in Iran reflect those observed for biogeographic regions. Specifically, 84% of the Iranian vascular plant endemics are restricted to the Irano-Anatolian hotspot, which is inside the Irano-Turanian region, whereas only 4% of the Iranian vascular plant endemics are restricted to the Caucasian hotspot inside the Euro-Siberian region.

With respect to areas of endemism, Zagros is the richest, harbouring 45% of the Iranian vascular plant endemics, the majority of which is restricted to this region (Figs 5, 6 and Table 5). Zagros is a continuous mountain range connecting the Azerbaijan Plateau and Alborz in the north to the Yazd-Kerman massifs in the south (Fig. 1). However, the connectivity is more contiguous in the montane zone and diminishes and eventually ceases with increasing elevation (Fig. 1). This increased isolation coincides with increased endemism, resulting in high endemic richness in areas with high elevational range (Noroozi et al. 2018), and an overall uneven distribution of endemic richness across Zagros. All of the ten most endemic-rich genera of Iran except Oxytropis (Fabaceae) are well-represented in Zagros (Fig. 4b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Distribution of endemic vascular plant species in general and of range-restricted endemic vascular plant species in Iran and its areas of endemism.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Endemic vascular plant species of Iran in areas of endemism. Endemic vascular plant species restricted to an area of endemism are indicated in dark grey, whereas those shared with other areas of endemism are indicated in light grey, their numbers being given in the bars connecting pie charts corresponding to areas of endemism.

Table 5.

Vascular plant endemism in the areas of endemism in Iran.

AE AE size (km2) Iranian endemic species AE endemic species Range-restricted endemic species Iranian endemic genera AE endemic genera
Zagros 393,799 1,167(45%) 746(29%) 490(35%) 15 6
Alborz 62,571 758(29%) 401(15%) 260(19%) 11 1
Azerbaijan Plateau 179,693 535(21%) 286(11%) 204(15%) 8 0
Kopet Dagh-Khorassan 64,698 328(13%) 202(8%) 150(11%) 4 1
Yazd-Kerman 154,123 307(12%) 101(4%) 69(5%) 5 0
Open in a new tab

The second-richest area is Alborz, which harbours 29% of all Iranian vascular plant endemics nearly half of them being restricted to Alborz (Figs 5, 6 and Table 5). If taking area size into account, Alborz is richer than other regions. This is particularly evident for range-restricted endemics (here species which are only in maximally three grid cells of 0.5° × 0.5°), where, compared to Zagros, Alborz has half the number of endemics on one fifth the area (Fig. 5; Table 5). Generally, Central Alborz has the highest concentration of endemics in the Iranian Plateau (Noroozi et al. 2018). Alborz is a narrow, but very high and contiguous east-west oriented mountain range (Fig. 1) that borders on lowland deserts in the south and on the Caspian Sea in the north. A wide elevational range, high topographic complexity and strong environmental heterogeneity explain its high plant diversity and great richness of endemics19. Alborz connects Kopet Dagh-Khorassan mountains in the east with the Azerbaijan Plateau and Zagros in the west (evident also in the high numbers of endemic species shared between Alborz and at least one of these regions; Fig. 6), thus acting as a corridor between Central Asia and Caucasus plus Anatolian mountains. Therefore, Alborz not only harbours a high number of local endemics, but also many elements showing biogeographic connections east- and/or westwards.

In the Azerbaijan Plateau, 21% of Iranian vascular plant endemics are found, half of which are endemic to this area (Figs 5, 6 and Table 5). The Azerbaijan Plateau has a fragmented orography caused by different tectonic and volcanic activities44. Although three times larger than Alborz, the Azerbaijan Plateau contains fewer endemics and range-restricted endemics (Fig. 5; Table 5). This area is close to the border of Iran and is connected to eastern Turkey and the Armenian mountains. Consequently, there are many species in this area shared with eastern Turkey, Transcaucasus and Caucasus22,45. Moreover, it is floristically linked to Alborz in the east and to Zagros in the south (Fig. 6). Nevertheless, it is diverse in local endemics, especially at higher elevations, which likely is due to the strong level of geographic isolation of single high summits (e.g., Sahand, Sabalan, Kiamaki). The Azerbaijan Plateau is the centre of diversification of Astragalus (Fabaceae; Fig. 4b)25,26.

The Kopet Dagh-Khorassan harbours 13% of Iranian vascular plant endemics, two thirds of which are restricted to this area (Figs 5, 6 and Table 5). Although of similar size to Alborz, Kopet Dagh-Khorassan harbours only about half as many endemics. This might be due to the lower topographic complexity and the smaller elevational range. Most of the endemic species of Kopet Dagh-Khorassan are range-restricted and rare. A high proportion of those endemics is from Cousinia (Asteraceae; Fig. 4b), which has its centre of diversification in these mountains38,46,47. Floristically, Kopet Dagh-Khorassan is most closely linked to Alborz among Iranian areas of endemism (Fig. 6).

The smallest proportion of vascular plant endemics is found in the Yazd-Kerman comprising 12% of Iranian vascular plant endemics, only one third of which is restricted to this area (Figs 5, 6 and Table 5). This area comprises several high elevation areas in southern Iran, topographically and thereupon floristically well connected to southern Zagros (Fig. 6). This spatial proximity to Zagros probably explains the relatively low proportion of endemics restricted to this region. At high elevations, the number of local endemics increases considerably, especially in Hezar and Lalezar Mts.48,49 and Shirkuh Mts. (Noroozi et al., unpublished data). A typical representative of the local endemic flora is Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae; Fig. 4b), which is highly diverse in this area50,51. Additionally, the Yazd-Kerman harbours isolated occurrences of species otherwise distributed in Hindukush and Central Asian mountains, especially in alpine regions30,49,52,53.

Considerable differences can be observed among areas of endemism with respect to the richness of the 10 largest genera of the Iranian endemic vascular flora (Fig. 4b), as shall be illustrated with the following examples. Astragalus (Fabaceae), Allium (Alliaceae) and Centaurea (Asteraceae) are well represented in the Azerbaijan Plateau, but Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae), Cousinia (Asteraceae) and Echinops (Asteraceae) are underrepresented in this area. Acantholimon, Echinops and Nepeta (Lamiaceae) are very well represented in Yazd-Kerman and Cousinia is very diverse in Kopet Dagh-Khorassan. Oxytropis (Fabaceae) is diverse in both Alborz and Kopet Dagh-Khorassan, but very poor in Zagros. The proportion of Silene (Caryophyllaceae) is high in Zagros, and Dionysia (Primulaceae) is a Zagros element with 29 endemic species in this mountain range, three species in Yazd-Kerman and only one species in Alborz.

Elevational distribution of endemics

The elevational distributions of surface area, non-endemic and endemic vascular plant species of Iran are displaced and peak at different elevations, as has already been found before on a taxonomically much smaller data set19. Despite a high proportion of surface area in lowlands (−26 to 1400 m), the proportions of non-endemics and especially of endemics in this elevation zone are low (Fig. 7). At mid elevations (1400 to 2800 m a.s.l.), the proportion of both non-endemics and endemics are high. At high elevations (2800 to 5671 m a.s.l.), although comprising only 1% of the surface area, the proportion of endemics becomes higher at the expense of the proportion of non-endemics. This confirms the importance of alpine habitats as endemism centres for vascular plants17.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Elevational distribution of total endemic compared to non-endemic vascular flora of Iran. (a) Proportion of surface area, non-endemic and endemic species richness along the elevational gradient. (b) Percentage of surface area, non-endemic and endemic richness in different elevational zones.

Life forms

Hemicryptophytes are the most dominant life form (60%) among the endemic vascular plant species, followed by chamaephytes (26%), geophytes (6%), therophytes (5%) and phanerophytes (3%). There are considerable differences in the proportion of life forms in the three phytogeographical regions (Fig. 8a). Hemicryptophytes are dominant to almost equal extents in all three regions, whereas chamaephytes are very poor in the Euro-Siberian region. The Euro-Siberian region with its high precipitation and temperate climate is covered by Hyrcanian forests, resulting in an overrepresentation of phanerophytes and an underrepresentation of chamaephytes, geophytes and therophytes compared to the other two regions. The majority of chamaephytes of the Iranian vascular flora are thorn-cushions, a life form adapted to windswept slopes in the regions with Mediterranean precipitation regimes54; such chamaephytes are dominant in the mountains of the Irano-Turanian region54–58. Geophytes are underrepresented and therophytes are prominent in the Saharo-Sindian region.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Life form spectra of the Iranian vascular flora in (a) phytogeographical regions and (b) areas of endemism.

In areas of endemism, the life form spectra are roughly similar among the areas (Fig. 8b). Exceptions are the Yazd-Kerman area with a high proportion of therophytes, Kopet Dagh-Khorassan with a low proportion of therophytes, and the Azerbaijan Plateau with a low proportion of phanerophytes compared to the other areas or to the average for Iran (Fig. 8b). The higher proportion of therophytes in Yazd-Kerman might be due to the longer warm and dry season on these mountains, which allows penetration by elements from the Saharo-Sindian region, whose flora is rich in therophytes.

Conclusion

Mountains influence the distribution and diversification of species and also maintain biodiversity over time59. Half of all the biodiversity hotspots are situated in mountains3, and our results indicate that 74% of all endemic vascular plant species of Iran are restricted to its mountains, which represent only about 42% of the country’s surface (elevations above 1400 m a.s.l.; Fig. 7). Generally, mountains with diverse micro-climates and topographic complexity promote high biodiversity and endemism60,61, which appears also to be the case for Iranian mountains19. The environmental heterogeneity provides diverse niche space allowing more species to coexist62, acts as trigger for diversification, resulting from isolation or adaptation to diverse environmental conditions63, and also enables the existence of particular habitats through longer time periods supporting relics64. The complex topography and the large elevational range potentially allowed Iranian plants to survive the Quaternary glaciations, as only the high elevations were covered with ice65 and lowlands could act as refugia for many relict elements such as Parrotia in the Hyrcanian Forests66. Additionally, Quaternary climatic fluctuations and associated shifts in habitats and vegetation zones may have triggered species diversification as, for instance, suggested for a group of steppe species within the hyperdiverse genus Astragalus67. However, understanding the origin of the biodiversity of the mountains of Iran requires molecular phylogenetic studies of their characteristic mega-genera. Until then, the evolutionary history of the taxa inhabiting these mountains remains one of the least understood fields of global biogeography, even though it is crucial for explaining the origin of plant diversity in mountains of Eurasia.

In Mediterranean mountain ranges, species richness has decreased during the past decade68. As the overall climate conditions in Iran are similar to those from Mediterranean regions, a decline of high-altitude habitats in the course of climate warming and reduced water availability can be expected in this region. Furthermore, pastoralism causes dramatic disturbance of mountain habitats of Iran. Pastoralism dates back to the Neolithic period69,70, since when it was extreme in several phases71. Pastoralism has already reduced the habitats of tree species like Quercus macranthera (Fagaceae) at the upper limit of the Hyrcanian forests and Juniperus excelsa (Cupressaceae) in the treeline zone of the southern slopes of Alborz72. Thus, with increasing anthropogenic pressure via pastoralism, urbanization, and road construction as well as ongoing global warming, mountain species are under increasing threat and need to be more strongly protected. According to the IUCN Red List, about one hundred species of the vertebrate fauna in Iran are considered vulnerable or already endangered73. For plants, nearly 60% of endemic vascular plant species of Iran are range-restricted and can be categorized as IUCN threatened species. Our knowledge about the centres of endemism in the Iranian Plateau is, however, still limited and future efforts will be needed to identify hotspots at a finer scale, “hotspots-within-hotspots”8,74,75, to aid practical conservation management.

Materials and Methods

Study area

Iran, with a surface area of c. 1.6 million km², is located between Central Asia and Himalaya in the east and Caucasus and Anatolia in the west. Iran displays considerable geologic and lithospheric heterogeneity, owing to its complex tectonic history76. One of the main tectonic events that influenced the geology and topography of Iran is the Arabia-Eurasia collision, which caused the uplift of numerous mountain ranges in the region, especially between the middle Miocene and the Pliocene77. The five major mountainous areas of Iran are the Azerbaijan Plateau, Alborz, Kopet Dagh-Khorassan, Zagros and the Yazd-Kerman massifs which are well associated with five areas of endemism (Fig. 1b). The elevation in Iran ranges from 26 m b.s.l. along the shore of the Caspian Sea up to 5,671 m a.s.l. at Damavand Mt. in Central Alborz. The climate is diverse and ranges from hot and dry deserts with precipitation of less than 25 mm/yr in central Iran to sub-tropical humid climates at the southern shore of the Caspian Sea with precipitation exceeding 1,800 mm/yr78. Nevertheless, major parts of Iran are characterised by continental climate with hot and dry summers, cold and harsh winters, and low precipitation66,79. Based on the Global Bioclimatic Classification System80,81 Iran is at the crossroad of three macrobioclimates (i.e. Mediterranean, tropical and temperate), correlating with the Irano-Turanian, Saharo-Sindian and Euro-Siberian biogeographical regions, respectively79,82.

Diverse climate and topography are paralleled by a multitude of vegetation types including desert and semidesert steppes, montane grasslands, wetlands, subalpine, alpine and subnival habitats, different types of shrublands and woodlands, deciduous temperate to subtropical forests, halophyte and even mangrove vegetation types66. These vegetation types are distributed in different elevational zones from 26 m b.s.l. up to 4,850 m a.s.l.72. Most of the biodiversity of Iran is centred within the two global biodiversity hotspots, i.e. the Irano-Anatolian and Caucasus hotspots (Fig. 1a), on five groups of mountain ranges (Fig. 1b). Iran covers 54% of the Irano-Anatolian hotspot and around 10% of the Caucasus hotspot (Fig. 1a). The species richness is not evenly distributed over the country and five areas of endemism have been identified, all of which are located in the Irano-Anatolian hotspot, and are well associated with major mountain ranges Fig. 1b;19. Azerbaijan Plateau, Alborz, Central Alborz, Zagros, the and Kopet Dagh-Khorassan were identified as areas of endemism in the Iranian Plateau based on data from Asteraceae19. Using the same approach (endemicity analysis) on the entire endemic vascular flora of Iran and a finer grid cell size, Yazd-Kerman is identified as an additional area of endemism (Noroozi et al., unpublished data), and is considered as such in this study. The Talysh mountains, which are located between Alborz and Azerbaijan, have a transitional situation, but their vascular flora is more linked to the Azerbaijan Plateau than to Alborz (Noroozi et al., unpublished data).

Species distribution data

All endemic and subendemic vascular plant species of Iran were documented. A species was considered endemic if its range is restricted to Iran, and considered subendemic if its main distribution (>80% of the known range or occurrences) lies within this country. We considered only taxa at the species level, but not subspecies or varieties. The documentation of species and the characterization of their geographical and altitudinal ranges were based on Flora Iranica83, Flora of Iran84 and monographs published after these floras until the end of 2016 (see Appendix S1, S2). The Flora Iranica taxonomic system is followed for family and genus level. The localities of all species were geo-referenced with a precision of at least 0.25° using Google Earth. Presence of species was then recorded on the basis of a grid with cell size of 0.5° × 0.5°. Species present in maximally three grid cells were considered as range-restricted endemics even if the grid cells were non-adjacent. We compared area size of Iran, number of total vascular plant species, number of vascular plant endemic species and the ten largest vascular plant families of Iran with those from other countries and regions in the west with similar climate, i.e. Mediterranean (Turkey, Greece, Italy, Morocco and Iberian Peninsula). The number of endemic vascular plant species of Iran and their restriction to the three phytogeographical regions18, two biodiversity hotspots7, and five areas of endemism19 (but not distinguishing Central Alborz, as it is geographically nested within Alborz, but additionally recognizing Yazd-Kerman) were analysed. Using the life form system of Raunkiaer85, the following five categories were used: chamaephytes, geophytes, hemicryptophytes, phanerophytes, and therophytes.

Supplementary information

Supplementary file (623.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous colleagues for contributing to the data set of the flora of Iran. Financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, P28489-B29 to G.M.S.) is acknowledged.

Author Contributions

J.N. conceived the ideas; J.N., A.T., M.D. and Z.A. collected the data; J.N. analyzed the data, and led the writing with all co-authors contributing.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-49417-1.

References

  • 1.Anderson S. Area and endemism. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1994;69:451–471. doi: 10.1086/418743. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lamoreux JF, et al. Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature. 2006;440:212–214. doi: 10.1038/nature04291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Riemann H, Ezcurra E. Plant endemism and natural protected areas in the peninsula of Baja California, Mexico. Biological Conservation. 2005;122:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gotelli NJ, et al. Patterns and causes of species richness: a general simulation model for macroecology. Ecology Letters. 2009;12:873–886. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lévêque, C. & Mounolou, J.-C. Biodiversity (Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007).
  • 7.Mittermeier, R. A. et al. Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions (Conservation International, 2005).
  • 8.Cañadas EM, et al. Hotspots within hotspots: Endemic plant richness, environmental drivers, and implications for conservation. Biological Conservation. 2014;170:282–291. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morrone JJ. The spectre of biogeographical regionalization. Journal of Biogeography. 2018;45:282–288. doi: 10.1111/jbi.13135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Treurnicht M, Colville JF, Joppa LN, Huyser O, Manning J. Counting complete? Finalising the plant inventory of a global biodiversity hotspot. PeerJ. 2017;5:e2984. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marshall CAM, Wieringa JJ, Hawthorne WD. Bioquality hotspots in the tropical African flora. Current Biology. 2016;26:3214–3219. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harold AS, Mooi RD. Areas of endemism: definition and recognition criteria. Systematic Biology. 1994;43:261–266. doi: 10.2307/2413466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morrone, J. J. Evolutionary Biogeography: An Integrative Approach with CaseStudies (Columbia University Press, 2008).
  • 14.Firouz, E. The Complete Fauna of Iran (Tauris, I. B., 2005).
  • 15.Frey, W., Kürschner, H. & Probst, W. In Encyclopaedia Iranica (ed Yarshater, E.) 43–63 (Mazda Publishers, Costa Mesa, 1999).
  • 16.Zohary, M. In Plant Life of South-West Asia (eds Davis, P. H., Harper. P. C., & Hedge, I. C.) 43–52 (Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 1971).
  • 17.Noroozi J, Moser D, Essl F. Diversity, distribution, ecology and description rates of alpine endemic plant species from Iranian mountains. Alpine Botany. 2016;126:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00035-015-0160-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.White F, Léonard J. Phytogeographical links between Africa and Southwest Asia. Flora et Vegetatio Mundi. 1991;9:229–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Noroozi J, et al. Hotspots within a global biodiversity hotspot - areas of endemism are associated with high mountain ranges. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:10345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28504-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Manafzadeh S, Salvo G, Conti E. A tale of migrations from east to west: the Irano-Turanian floristic region as a source of Mediterranean xerophytes. Journal of Biogeography. 2014;41:366–379. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akhani H. A new spiny, cushion-like Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) from south-west Iran with special reference to the phytogeographic importance of local endemic species. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004;146:107–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00310.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Akhani H. Diversity, biogeography, and photosynthetic pathways of Argusia and Heliotropium (Boraginaceae) in South-West Asia with an analysis of phytogeographical units. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2007;155:401–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00707.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Freitag H. Notes on the distribution, climate and flora of the sand deserts of Iran and Afghanistan. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences. 1986;89:135–146. doi: 10.1017/S0269727000008976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hedge IC, Wendelbo P. Patterns of distribution and endemism in Iran. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. 1978;36:441–464. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mahmoodi M, Maassoumi AA, Hamzeh’ee B. Geographical distribution of Astragalus (Fabaceae) in Iran. Rostaniha. 2009;10:112–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mahmoodi M, Maassoumi AA, Jalili A. Distribution patterns of Astragalus in the Old World based on some selected sections. Rostaniha. 2012;13:39–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Memariani F, Akhani H, Joharchi MR. Endemic plants of Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province in Irano-Turanian region: diversity, distribution patterns and conservation status. Phytotaxa. 2016;249:31–117. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.249.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Memariani F, Zarrinpour V, Akhani H. A review of plant diversity, vegetation, and phytogeography of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province in the Irano-Turanian region (northeastern Iran–southern Turkmenistan) Phytotaxa. 2016;249:8–30. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.249.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Noroozi J, Akhani H, Breckle S-W. Biodiversity and phytogeography of the alpine flora of Iran. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2008;17:493–521. doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9246-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Noroozi J, Pauli H, Grabherr G, Breckle S-W. The subnival–nival vascular plant species of Iran: a unique high-mountain flora and its threat from climate warming. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2011;20:1319–1338. doi: 10.1007/s10531-011-0029-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sales F, Hedge IC. Generic endemism in South-West Asia: an overview. Rostaniha. 2013;14:22–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wendelbo, P. In Plant Life of South-West Asia (eds Davis, P. H., Harper, P. C., & Hedge, I. C.) 29–41 (Botanical Society of Edinburgh., 1971).
  • 33.Al-Shehbaz IA. A generic and tribal synopsis of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) Taxon. 2012;61:931–954. doi: 10.1002/tax.615002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hedge, I. C. In The Biology and Chemistry of the Cruciferae (eds J.G. Vaughan, A. J. Mac Leod, & B. M. G. Jones) 1–45 (Academic Press, 1976).
  • 35.Moazzeni H, Zarre S, Al-Shehbaz IA, Mummenhoff K. Seed-coat microsculpturing and its systematic application in Isatis (Brassicaceae) and allied genera in Iran. Flora. 2007;202:447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2006.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mummenhoff K, Al-Shehbaz IA, Bakker FT, Linder HP, Mühlhausen A. Phylogeny, morphological evolution, and speciation of endemic Brassicaceae genera in the Cape flora of southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 2005;92:400–424. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li J, Del Tredici P. The Chinese Parrotia: a sibling species of the Persian Parrotia. Arnoldia. 2008;66:2–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mehregan I, Kadereit JW. Taxonomic revision of Cousinia sect. Cynaroideae (Asteraceae, Cardueae) Willdenowia. 2008;38:293–362. doi: 10.3372/wi.38.38201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hobohm, C. Endemism in VascularPlants. (Springer, 2014).
  • 40.Buira A, Aedo C, Medina L. Spatial patterns of the Iberian and Balearic endemic vascular flora. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2017;26:479–508. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1254-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hobohm, C. & Tucker, C. M. In Endemism in Vascular Plants (ed Carsten Hobohm) 3–9 (Springer, 2014).
  • 42.Spehn EM, Rudmann-Maurer K, Körner C. Mountain biodiversity. Plant Ecology & Diversity. 2011;4:301–302. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2012.698660. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Akhani H, Djamali M, Ghorbanalizadeh A, Ramezani E. Plant biodiversity of Hyrcanian relict forests, N Iran: An overview of the flora, vegetation, palaeoecology and conservation. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010;42:231–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Innocenti, F., Manetti, P., Mazzuoli, R., Pasquaré, G. & Villari, L. In Andesites: Orogenic Andesites and Related Rocks (ed. Thorpe, R. S.) 327–349 (John Wiley & Sons, 1982).
  • 45.Noroozi J, Willner W, Pauli H, Grabherr G. Phytosociology and ecology of the high-alpine to subnival scree vegetation of N and NW Iran (Alborz and Azerbaijan Mts.) Applied Vegetation Science. 2014;17:142–161. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Knapp HD. On the distribution of the genus Cousinia (Compositae) Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1987;155:15–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00936283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.López-Vinyallonga S, Mehregan I, Garcia-Jacas N, Kadereit JW. Phylogeny and evolution of the Arctium-Cousinia complex (Compositae,Cardueae-Carduinae) Taxon. 2009;58:153–171. doi: 10.1002/tax.581016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Noroozi J, Ajani Y, Nordenstam B. A new annual species of Senecio (Compositae-Senecioneae) from subnival zone of southern Iran with comments on phytogeographical aspects of the area. Compositae Newsletter. 2010;48:43–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rajaei P, Maassoumi AA, Mozaffarian V, Nejad Sattari T, Pourmirzaei A. Alpine flora of Hezar mountain (SE Iran) Rostaniha. 2011;12:111–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Assadi M. Distribution patterns of the genus Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae) in Iran. Iranian Journal of Botany. 2006;12:114–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moharrek F, Kazempour-Osaloo S, Assadi M, Feliner GN. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a wide circumscription of a characteristic Irano-Turanian element: Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae: Limonioideae) Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2017;184:366–386. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/box033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ajani Y, Noroozi J, Levichev IG. Gagea alexii (Liliaceae), a new record from subnival zone of southern Iran with key and notes on sect. Incrustatae. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010;42:67–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Doostmohammadi M, Kilian N. Lactuca pumila (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) revisited—additional evidence for a phytogeographical link between SE Zagros and Hindu Kush. Phytotaxa. 2017;307:133–140. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.307.2.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kürschner H. The subalpine thorn-cushion formations of western South-West Asia: ecology, structure and zonation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section B. Biological Sciences. 1986;89:169–179. doi: 10.1017/S0269727000009003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Klein JC. Les pelouses xérophiles d’‏altitude du flanc sud de l’Alborz central (Iran) Phytocoenologia. 1987;15:253–280. doi: 10.1127/phyto/15/1987/253. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Klein JC. Les groupements à grandes ombellifères et à xérophytes orophiles: Essai de synthèse à l’échelle de la région irano-touranienne. Phytocoenologia. 1988;16:1–36. doi: 10.1127/phyto/16/1988/1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Noroozi J, Akhani H, Wıllner W. Phytosociological and ecological study of the high alpine vegetation of Tuchal Mountains (Central Alborz, Iran) Phytocoenologia. 2010;40:293–321. doi: 10.1127/0340-269X/2010/0040-0478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Noroozi J, Hülber K, Willner W. Phytosociological and ecological description of the high alpine vegetation of NW Iran. Phytocoenologia. 2017;47:233–259. doi: 10.1127/phyto/2017/0108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hoorn, C., Perrigo, A. & Antonelli, A. Mountains, Climate and Biodiversity (Wiley-Blackwell, 2018).
  • 60.Irl SDH, et al. Climate vs. topography – spatial patterns of plant species diversity and endemism on a high-elevation island. Journal of Ecology. 2015;103:1621–1633. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Steinbauer MJ, et al. Topography-driven isolation, speciation and a global increase of endemism with elevation (Forthcoming) Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2016;25:1097–1107. doi: 10.1111/geb.12469. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tews J, et al. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography. 2004;31:79–92. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hughes C, Eastwood R. Island radiation on a continental scale: Exceptional rates of plant diversification after uplift of the Andes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103:10334–10339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601928103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fjeldså J, Bowie RCK, Rahbek C. The role of mountain ranges in the diversification of birds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2012;43:249–265. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Becker, D., Verheul, J., Zickel, M. & Willmes, C. LGM paleoenvironment of Europe - Map. CRC806-Database, 10.5880/SFB806.15 (2015).
  • 66.Zohary, M. Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle East 2. (Gustav Fischer, 1973).
  • 67.Bagheri A, Maassoumi AA, Rahiminejad MR, Brassac J, Blattner FR. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Astragalus section Hymenostegis: An analysis of a rapidly diversifying species group in Fabaceae. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:14033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14614-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pauli H, et al. Recent plant diversity changes on Europe’s mountain summits. Science. 2012;336:353–355. doi: 10.1126/science.1219033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature. 2002;418:700–707. doi: 10.1038/nature01019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zeder MA, Hesse B. The initial domestication of goats (Capra hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 years ago. Science. 2000;287:2254–2257. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5461.2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Djamali M, et al. A late Holocene pollen record from Lake Almalou in NW Iran: evidence for changing land-use in relation to some historical events during the last 3700 years. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009;36:1364–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.01.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Noroozi J, Körner C. A bioclimatic characterization of high elevation habitats in the Alborz mountains of Iran. Alpine Botany. 2018;128:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00035-018-0202-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jowkar H, Ostrowski S, Tahbaz M, Zahler P. The conservation of biodiversity in Iran: threats, challenges and hopes. Iranian Studies. 2016;49:1065–1077. doi: 10.1080/00210862.2016.1241602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Harris GM, Jenkins CN, Pimm SL. Refining biodiversity conservation priorities. Conservation Biology. 2005;19:1957–1968. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00307.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Murray-Smith C, et al. Plant diversity hotspots in the Atlantic coastal forests of Brazil. Conservation Biology. 2009;23:151–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Stöcklin J. Structural history and tectonics of Iran; a review. AAPG Bulletin. 1968;52:1229–1258. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Berberian M, King GCP. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 1981;18:210–265. doi: 10.1139/e81-019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Djamali, M. Palaeoenvironmental Changes in Iran During the Last Two Climatic Cycles (Vegetation-Climate-Anthropisation). Unpublished PhD thesis. (Aix-Marseille, 2008).
  • 79.Djamali M, Brewer S, Breckle SW, Jackson ST. Climatic determinism in phytogeographic regionalization: A test from the Irano-Turanian region, SW and Central. Asia. Flora. 2012;207:237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2012.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rivas-Martínez S. Syntaxonomical synopsis of the potential natural plant communities of North America, I:(Compedio sintaxonómico de la vegetación natural potencial de Norteamérica, I) Itinera Geobotanica. 1997;10:5–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rivas-Martínez S, Sánchez-Mata D, Costa M. Boreal and western Temperate forest vegetation (syntaxonomical synopsis of the potential natural plant communities of North America II) Itinera Geobotanica. 1999;12:3–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Djamali M, et al. Application of the Global Bioclimatic Classification to Iran: implications for understanding the modern vegetation and biogeography. Ecologia Mediterranea. 2011;37:91–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rechinger, K. H. Flora Iranica. Vol. 1–181 (Akad. Druck- Verlagsanstalt. & Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 1963–2015).
  • 84.Assadi, M., Khatamsaz, M., Maassoumi, A. A. & Mozaffarian, V. Flora of Iran. (Research Institute of Forests & Rangelands, 1989–2018).
  • 85.Raunkiaer, C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical PlantGeography. (Clarendon Press, 1934).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary file (623.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES