Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Sep 10;9:13032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49623-x

Down-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 attenuates p53-dependent apoptosis of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons following transient cerebral ischemia

Bich Na Shin 1,#, Dae Won Kim 2,#, In Hye Kim 3, Joon Ha Park 4, Ji Hyeon Ahn 5, Il Jun Kang 6, Yun Lyul Lee 7, Choong-Hyun Lee 8, In Koo Hwang 9, Young-Myeong Kim 10, Sungwoo Ryoo 11, Tae-Kyeong Lee 12, Moo-Ho Won 12,, Jae-Chul Lee 12,
PMCID: PMC6737192  PMID: 31506563

Abstract

Abnormal activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) is associated with pathophysiological conditions. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) can provide neuroprotective effects against subsequent lethal ischemic insult. The objective of this study was to determine how Cdk5 and related molecules could affect neuroprotection in the hippocampus of gerbils after with IPC [a 2-min transient cerebral ischemia (TCI)] followed by 5-min subsequent TCI. Hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons were dead at 5 days post-TCI. However, treatment with roscovitine (a potent inhibitor of Cdk5) and IPC protected CA1 pyramidal neurons from TCI. Expression levels of Cdk5, p25, phospho (p)-Rb and p-p53 were increased in nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons at 1 and 2 days after TCI. However, these expressions were attenuated by roscovitine treatment and IPC. In particular, Cdk5, p-Rb and p-p53 immunoreactivities in their nuclei were decreased. Furthermore, TUNEL-positive CA1 pyramidal neurons were found at 5 days after TCI with increased expression levels of Bax, PUMA, and activated caspase-3. These TUNEL-positive cells and increased molecules were decreased by roscovitine treatment and IPC. Thus, roscovitine treatment and IPC could protect CA1 pyramidal neurons from TCI through down-regulating Cdk5, p25, and p-p53 in their nuclei. These findings indicate that down-regulating Cdk5 might be a key strategy to attenuate p53-dependent apoptosis of CA1 pyramidal neurons following TCI.

Subject terms: Stroke, Cell death in the nervous system

Introduction

TCI occurs when blood flow to the brain is disrupted, resulting in oxygen and glucose deprivation of the tissues that can lead to “delayed neuronal death” in selectively vulnerable brain areas including the CA1 area of the hippocampus1. Clinically, brief ischemic events can induce ischemic tolerance by evoking the threshold of cerebral vulnerability, which is critical for neuroprotection2. It has been reported that transient ischemic damage can be prevented by ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in humans suffering transient ischemic attacks3 without leading to neuronal death4,5. Kitagawa et al. firstly introduced IPC as a strategy to attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury in the brain using a gerbil model of TCI. Further studies have widely demonstrated IPC in other animal models of transient focal cerebral ischemia6. This phenomenon is called cerebral “ischemic tolerance”7, although mechanisms underlying brain ischemic tolerance have not been fully understood yet.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5), a proline-directed serine/threonine cyclin-dependent kinase family member, plays an important role in neuronal differentiation, axonal outgrowth, synaptogenesis, and memory formation8. Activation of Cdk5 can lead to translocation of Cdk5 from membrane to cytoplasm or nucleus9. Studies using rodents have also demonstrated that aberrant activity of Cdk5 primarily induces neuronal cell death during stroke10,11. To have normal function, Cdk5 has to bind to neuron-specific regulatory subunit protein p35 that is beneficial for neuronal development12. However, p35 is cleaved into p25 under a variety of pathological conditions13. Overexpression of p25 essentially activates Cdk5 and accesses various pathological substrates that trigger a cascade of neurotoxic pathways and culminate in neuronal death. For example, cerebral ischemic insults promote Ca2+ influx via calpain activation, which cleaves p35 to p25. The accumulation of p25 evokes a prolonged activation of Cdk5 in the brain. These alterations are responsible for neuronal death14,15. Furthermore, inhibition of the interaction between Cdk5 and p25 could decrease spinal injury in rats induced by acute spinal ischemia-reperfusion injury16. Therefore, inhibiting cleavage of p35 to p25 would be therapeutically beneficial against ischemic insults. In addition, up-regulation of Cdk5 is related to apoptosis in certain cell types17,18. However, mechanisms by which active Cdk5 can facilitate apoptosis are currently unclear, although it has been suggested that Cdk5 and its activators play important roles in the regulation of neuronal apoptosis following ischemic insults.

p53 (a tumor suppressor) plays an important role in regulating neuronal survival in the central nervous system19. However, in response to cellular stresses including DNA damage and hypoxia, p53 is a major inducer of apoptosis via up-regulation of many target genes in various cell types including neurons20. Moreover, biochemical hallmarks of apoptosis include caspase activation in animal models of ischemic insults21, and caspases have been identified as critical components in p53-induced cell death pathway22. Importantly, Cdk5 activity is related to increased p53 expression and activation23. However, whether this process occurs in IPC-induced neurons suffering from a subsequent TCI is currently unclear. Various possible explanations of neuroprotective effects of IPC against a subsequent ischemic damage have been proposed.

To the best of our knowledge, expression patterns of Cdk5, p53, and apoptosis-related proteins in IPC-induced brain following a subsequent TCI have not been reported yet. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate effects of inhibiting Cdk5 and IPC on a subsequent ischemic insult. Changes in expressions of Cdk5, p35/p25, phospho (p)-p53, Bax, Bcl-2, PUMA, and caspase-3 in the hippocampus after roscovitine (a potent inhibitor of Cdk5) treatment and IPC following a subsequent TCI were determined using gerbil as a good animal model of TCI24.

Results

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated neuroprotection against TCI

Cresyl violet-positive (CV+) cells

Roscovitine- and IPC-induced neuronal survival by using CV staining in the gerbil hippocampal CA1 area after TCI is shown in Fig. 1A. In the sham group, CV+ cells in the stratum pyramidale of the CA1 area, which are named CA1 pyramidal neurons, were large in size, pyramidal or round in shape (Fig. 1A). In the TCI group, the morphology and numbers of CV+ CA1 pyramidal cells were not changed until 3 days after TCI (data not shown). At 5 days after TCI, CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were significantly damaged and hardly shown; however, pyramidal neurons in the CA2/3 area were intact (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated neuroprotection against TCI. (A) CV staining in the hippocampus of the TCI (1st and 2nd columns), roscovitine + TCI (3rd and 4th columns) and IPC + TCI (5th and 6th columns) groups. CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons (arrows) are damaged 5 days after TCI; however, CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons (asterisks) in the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups are similar to those in the sham group. Scale bar = 800 µm (1st, 3rd and 5th columns), 50 µm (2nd, 4th and 6th columns). (B) NeuN immunohistochemistry (1st, 3rd and 5th columns) and F-J B histofluorescence staining (2nd, 4th and 6th columns) in the CA1 area of the TCI (1st and 2nd columns), roscovitine + TCI (3rd and 4th columns) and IPC + TCI (5th and 6th columns) groups. In the TCI group, a few NeuN+ (arrows) and many F-J B+ (asterisk) CA1 pyramidal neurons are detected 5 days after TCI. In the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups, many NeuN+ pyramidal neurons are observed in the CA1 area; F-J B-positive cells are lower than those in the TCI group. SO, stratum oriens; SP, stratum pyramidale; SR, stratum radiatum. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative graphs for numbers of NeuN+ (left) and F-J B+ (right) CA1 pyramidal neurons. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group).

In the roscovitine + sham group, the distribution pattern and morphology of CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were not different from the sham group (Fig. 1A). In the roscovitine + TCI groups, the distribution pattern and morphology of CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were similar to those in the sham groups (Fig. 1A).

In the IPC + sham group, the distribution pattern and morphology of CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were also not different from those in the sham group (Fig. 1A). In the IPC + TCI groups, the distribution pattern and morphology of CV+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were also like those in the sham group (Fig. 1A).

Neuronal nuclei+ (NeuN+) and Fluoro-Jade B+ (F-J B+) cells

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated neuroprotection in the CA1 area was examined by NeuN immunohistochemistry and F-J B histofluorescence staining (Fig. 1B,C). In the sham group, CA1 pyramidal neurons were easily stained with NeuN, and no F-J B+ neurons were found in the CA1 area (Fig. 1B). In the TCI group, NeuN+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were significantly reduced (8.9 ± 4.3% of the sham group) and abundant F-J B+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were shown 5 days after TCI (Fig. 1B).

In the roscovitine + sham group, the distribution of NeuN+ CA1 pyramidal neurons was not different from that in the sham group, and any F-J B+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were not detected (Fig. 1B). In the roscovitine + TCI group, NeuN+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were well protected by roscovitine treatment (83.5 ± 5.2% of the sham group), and the number of F-J B+ cells was 20.7 ± 5.1% % lower than that in the 5 days after TCI (Fig. 1B).

In the IPC + sham and IPC + TCI groups, findings from NeuN immunohistochemistry and F-J B histofluorescence staining were not different from those in the sham group (Fig. 1B).

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated suppression of Cdk5 expression and its translocation after TCI

Cdk5 levels

To identify whether Cdk5 activation is required for delayed neuronal death in the CA1 area after TCI, we examined levels of Cdk5 proteins in the CA1 area with or without roscovitine treatment and IPC after TCI (Fig. 2A). Cdk5 was immunoprecipitated from nucleus and cytosol extracts of the CA1 area (Fig. 2A). Cdk5 protein in the CA1 area of the sham group appeared throughout the nucleus and cytosol fractions, and the cdk5 protein level was significantly increased in the cytosol fraction compared with that in the nucleus fraction (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of roscovitine and IPC on Cdk5 expression and its translocation after TCI. (A) Western blots of Cdk5 levels in the CA1 area of the TCI, roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. α-Tubulin, lamin B and β-actin densitometric values are used to standardize for cytosol and nucleus protein loading, respectively. Relative band intensity of total cytosol and nucleus Cdk5 level is measured by densitometer. Molecular weight is indicated as kDa on the right side of the immunoblots. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group). (B) Immunohistochemistry of Cdk5 in the CA1 area of the TCI (left column), roscovitine + TCI (middle column), and IPC + TCI (right column) groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. Cdk5 immunoreactivity is translocated into nuclei (arrows) in CA1 pyramidal neurons of the TCI group 1 and 2 days after TCI and hardly detected 5 days after TCI. In the roscovitine + sham, IPC + sham, roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups, Cdk5 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons is similar to that in the sham group. SO, stratum oriens; SP, stratum pyramidale; SR, stratum radiatum. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative graph of Cdk5 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons. A ratio of the ROD was calibrated as %, with the sham group designated as 100%. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group). (C) Double immunofluorescence staining for Cdk5 (red), DAPI (blue) and merged images at 1 day after TCI. Cdk5+ immunofluorescence in the SP are colocalized with DAPI+ nuclei (white arrows). Scale bar = 50 μm.

In the TCI groups, Cdk5 protein levels increased significantly in the nucleus fraction with a concomitant reduction in the cytosol fraction 1 and 2 days after TCI, and Cdk5 protein levels in both fractions were significantly decreased 5 days after TCI compared with those in the sham group (Fig. 2A).

Cdk5 protein levels in the roscovitine + TCI group were not altered compared with that in the roscovitine + sham group (Fig. 2A).

In the IPC + TCI group, levels of Cdk5 protein were similar to that in the sham group (Fig. 2A).

Cdk5 immunoreactivity

We examined change in Cdk5 immunoreactivity in the CA1 area in all experimental groups (Fig. 2B). Cdk5 immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of the CA1 pyramidal neurons in the sham group (Fig. 2B). One and 2 days after TCI, Cdk5 immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of CA1 pyramidal neurons was not shown, instead, Cdk5 immunoreactivity was observed only in nuclei of the CA1 pyramidal neurons (Fig. 2B). Five days after TCI, Cdk5 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was barely observed (Fig. 2B).

In the roscovitine + sham group, Cdk5 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was similar to that in the sham group. In the roscovitine + TCI group, the pattern of Cdk5 immunoreactivity did not change at any time after TCI compared with that in the roscovitine + sham group (Fig. 2B).

In the IPC + sham and IPC + TCI groups, Cdk5 immunoreactivity was also like that in the roscovitine + sham and roscovitine + TCI groups (Fig. 2B).

In addition, one day after TCI, we confirmed that the Cdk5 immunoreactivity was found in DAPI stained nuclei of the CA1 pyramidal neurons (Fig. 2C).

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated expressions of p35 and p25 levels after TCI

Subsequently, western blots were performed to investigate temporal expression patterns of relevant proteins such as p35 and p25 with roscovitine- and IPC-mediated neuroprotection in tissues of the CA1 area (Fig. 3). High level of p35 protein was detected in the CA1 area of the sham group (Fig. 3). In the TCI group, the level of p35 protein was slightly decreased 1 day and 2 days after TCI compared to those in the sham group, and intensely decreased 5 days after TCI (Fig. 3). On the contrary, p25 protein level was low in the sham group, and the level markedly increased 1 and 2 days after TCI (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of roscovitine and IPC on levels of p35/p25 proteins in the TCI, roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. β-actin is used as a protein loading control. Relative band intensity of p35/p25 levels was measured by densitometer. Levels of p25 protein in the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups are significantly low compared with those in the TCI group. Molecular weight is indicated as kDa on the right side of the immunoblots. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group).

In the roscovitine + TCI group, p35 protein levels were not changed at any times after TCI compared with those in the roscovitine + sham group (Fig. 3). The level of p25 in the roscovitine + sham group was similar to that in the sham group (data not shown). In the roscovitine + TCI group, p25 levels were also not changed at any times after TCI compared with that in the roscovitine + sham group (Fig. 3).

In the IPC + TCI group, change pattern of p35 protein levels was like that in the roscovitine + TCI group (Fig. 3). In the IPC + TCI group, levels of p25 protein were higher than those in the roscovitine + TCI group from 1 day to 5 days after TCI (Fig. 3).

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated suppressions of Rb phosphorylation after TCI

Rb levels

Previous some data have suggested that the phosphorylation of Rb protein could be mediated through Cdk5 pathway. Therefore, we carried out Rb and p-Rb western blotting to demonstrate the p25-Cdk5 activity (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of roscovitine and IPC on Rb expression after TCI. (A) Western blots of total Rb and p-Rb in the CA1 area of the TCI, roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. β-actin is used as a protein loading control. Relative band intensity of Rb and p-Rb level is measured by densitometer. p-Rb level is significantly low in the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups compared with the TCI group. Molecular weight is indicated as kDa on the right side of the immunoblots. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group). (B) p-Rb immunoreactivity in the CA1 area of the TCI (left column), roscovitine + TCI (middle column) and IPC + TCI (right column) groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. p-Rb immunoreactivity in the TCI group is very strong in nuclei (arrows) of CA1 pyramidal neurons 1 and 2 days after TCI. In the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups, the pattern of p-Rb immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was similar to that in the sham group. SO, stratum oriens; SP, stratum pyramidale; SR, stratum radiatum. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative graph of p-Rb immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons. A ratio of the ROD was calibrated as %, with the sham group designated as 100%. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group).

The level of p-Rb protein was weakly observed in the CA1 area of the sham group, significantly enhanced 1 and 2 days after TCI and markedly decreased 5 days after TCI (Fig. 4A), which coincides with Cdk5/p25 protein activity after TCI.

In the roscovitine + TCI group, the level of p-Rb protein was not changed at any times after TCI compared with that in the sham group (Fig. 4A).

In the IPC IPC + TCI group, levels of p-Rb protein were similar to that in the sham group (Fig. 4A).

p-Rb immunoreactivity

We examined cellular distribution of p-Rb protein in CA1 pyramidal neurons with or without roscovitine treatment and IPC, respectively, after TCI (Fig. 4B).

p-Rb immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons of the sham group was very weak (Fig. 5B). In the TCI group, many CA1 pyramidal neurons showed strong p-Rb immunoreactivity in their nuclei 1 and 2 days after TCI; however, p-Rb immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was markedly decreased at 5 days after TCI (Fig. 4B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of roscovitine and IPC on p53 phosphorylation and its translocation after TCI. (A) Western blots of p53 and p-p53 in the CA1 area of the TCI, roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. β-actin is used as a protein loading control. Relative band intensity of total p53 and p-p53 level is measured by densitometer. p-p53 levels are significantly low in the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups compared with the TCI group. Molecular weight is indicated as kDa on the right side of the immunoblots. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group). (B) p-p53 immunoreactivity in the CA1 area of the TCI (left column), roscovitine + TCI (middle column) and IPC + TCI (right column) groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. p-p53 immunoreactivity in the TCI group is very strong in nuclei (arrows) of CA1 pyramidal neurons 1 and 2 days after TCI. In the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups, p-p53 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons is moderated 1 and 2 days after TCI, and the immunoreactivity is shown in both nuclei and cytoplasm. SO, stratum oriens; SP, stratum pyramidale; SR, stratum radiatum. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative graph of p-p53 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons. A ratio of the ROD was calibrated as %, with the sham group designated as 100%. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group).

In the roscovitine + sham and roscovitine + TCI groups, p-Rb immunoreactivity weakly appeared in nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons and was similar to that in the sham group (Fig. 4B).

In the IPC + sham and IPC + TCI groups, the pattern of p-Rb immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was similar to that in the roscovitine + sham and roscovitine + TCI groups (Fig. 4B).

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated suppression of p-p53 expression and its translocation after TCI

p-p53 levels

As described in above, Cdk5 was upregulated in nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons after TCI. This finding needed to investigate whether Cdk5 was relevant to the phosphorylation of p53 protein after TCI. Based on this hypothesis, we examined the phosphorylation of p53 protein in CA1 pyramidal neurons with or without roscovitine and IPC, respectively, after TCI (Fig. 5A).

Western blot showed that the level of p-p53 protein in the sham group was weak, significantly enhanced 1 and 2 days after TCI and markedly decreased 5 days after TCI (Fig. 5A). This coincided with Cdk5 protein level/kinase activity after TCI.

In the roscovitine + TCI group, the level of p-p53 protein was significantly lower at all times after TCI compared with that in the TCI group (Fig. 5A).

In the IPC + TCI group, the change pattern of p-p53 protein was similar to that in the roscovitine + TCI group; however, the level of p-p53 protein was lower compared with that in the roscovitine + TCI group (Fig. 5A).

p-p53 immunoreactivity

Subsequently, we examined cellular distribution of p-p53 protein in CA1 pyramidal neurons with or without roscovitine and IPC, respectively, after TCI (Fig. 5B).

p-p53 immunoreactivity was very weak in CA1 pyramidal neurons of the sham group (Fig. 5B). In the TCI group, many CA1 pyramidal neurons showed strong p-p53 immunoreactivity in their nuclei 1 day after TCI, and similar p-p53 immunoreactivity was maintained 2 days after TCI; however, p-p53 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was very weak at 5 days after TCI (Fig. 5B).

In the roscovitine + sham group, weak p-p53 immunoreactivity was shown in nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons (Fig. 5B). In the roscovitine + TCI group, increased p-p53 immunoreactivity was observed in both cytoplasm and nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons 1 day after TCI, and the pattern was similar 2 days after TCI (Fig. 5B). Five days after TCI, p-p53 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons area was also not changed compared with that at 2 days after TCI (Fig. 5B).

In the IPC + sham group, p-p53 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was not different from that in the roscovitine + sham group (Fig. 5B). In the IPC + TCI group, the pattern of p-p53 immunoreactivity in CA1 pyramidal neurons was similar to that in the roscovitine + TCI group; however, the immunoreactivity was lower compared with that in the roscovitine + TCI group (Fig. 5B).

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated suppression of Bax, PUMA and active caspase-3 levels after TCI

To explore a possible pattern of the death of CA1 pyramidal neurons after TCI, we examined levels of Bax, Bcl-2, PUMA and caspase-3 proteins in the CA1 area with or without roscovitine and IPC after TCI (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effects of roscovitine and IPC on Bax, Bcl-2, PUMA and caspase-3 (inactive and active form) levels in the TCI, roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups at sham, 1, 2 and 5 days after TCI. β-actin is used as a protein loading control. Relative band intensity of Bax, Bcl-2, PUMA and caspase-3 (inactive and active form) levels is measured by densitometer. Molecular weight is indicated as kDa on the right side of the immunoblots. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group).

Western blot analyses showed that levels of Bax, PUMA and active caspase-3 proteins were significantly increased 1 day and 2 days after TCI (Fig. 6). This coincided with the pattern of p53 levels at the same point in time after TCI. On the other hand, Bcl-2 level was significantly increased 1 day after TCI and gradually decreased with time after TCI (Fig. 6).

In the roscovitine + TCI group, levels of Bax, PUMA and caspase-3 proteins were significantly decreased, and Bcl-2 levels were markedly increased compared to the TCI group from 1 day to 5 days after TCI (Fig. 6).

In the IPC + TCI group, the pattern of levels of Bax, Bcl-2, PUMA and caspase 3 proteins was similar to that in the roscovitine + TCI group; however, levels of Bax, PUMA and caspase 3 proteins were higher than those in the roscovitine + TCI group from 1 day to 5 days after TCI, but, Bcl-2 levels were not changed compared with that in the roscovitine + TCI group (Fig. 6).

Roscovitine- and IPC-mediated suppression of apoptosis following TCI

To investigate whether Cdk5 was relevant to neuronal apoptosis after TCI, we carried out TUNEL staining in the CA1 area with or without roscovitine and IPC after TCI (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effect of roscovitine and IPC on apoptosis of CA1 pyramidal neuroins using TUNEL staining in the TCI (left column), roscovitine + TCI (middle column), and IPC + TCI (right column) groups at sham and 5 days after TCI. Many TUNEL+ CA1 pyramidal neurons (arrows) are found in the stratum pyramidale (SP) of the TCI group 5 days after TCI. However, TUNEL+ cells are significantly low in the roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups compared with the TCI group, respectively. SO, stratum oriens; SR, stratum radiatum. Scale bar = 50 µm. The quantitative graph is shown the percentage of TUNEL+ cells in the SP. The bars are reported as means ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 7, *P < 0.05 vs. sham group; #P < 0.05 vs TCI group; P < 0.05 vs roscovitine + TCI group).

In the sham group, no TUNEL+ cells were found in the CA1 area; however, a significant increase of TUNEL+ CA1 pyramidal neurons was observed in the stratum pyramidale 5 days after TCI (Fig. 7).

In the roscovitine + sham group, no TUNEL+ CA1 pyramidal neurons cells were found, and, in the roscovitine + TCI group, TUNEL+ cells (31.4 ± 2.35% of the TCI group) were found 5 days after TCI (Fig. 7).

In the IPC + sham group, also, TUNEL+ CA1 pyramidal neurons were not shown in the CA1 stratum pyramidale, and few TUNEL+ CA1 pyramidal neurons (3.76 ± 1.2% of the TCI group) were found in the IPC + TCI group 5 days after TCI (Fig. 7).

Discussion

IPC cannot lead to neuronal damage/death in ischemic brains because it can induce neuronal tolerance to a longer and/or severer subsequent transient ischemia25. In the present study, IPC was induced by subjecting gerbils to a 2 min of transient brain ischemia. We found that CA1 pyramidal neurons were not killed in the hippocampus following TCI. This means that IPC effectively protected neurons from TCI. In this regard, remarkable protection induced by IPC might be an attractive strategy to develop potential therapeutics26.

Neuronal death in the brain following cerebral ischemia or stoke is associated with inappropriate activation of Cdk527. For instance, Cdk5 activity is increased rat brain following focal and global cerebral ischemia10,11. In stroke-affected patients, the expression of phosphorylated Cdk5 is substantially increased in damaged neurons, but not in healthy brain neurons28. On the other hand, in a rat model of hypoxia/ischemia injury, inhibition of Cdk5 activity after hypoxia/ischemic insult can dramatically reduce infarction and displays functional recovery29. It has been reported that roscovitine, a potent inhibitor of Cdk5 in neurons, can decrease transient ischemia-induced Tau hyperphosphorylation30, microglia proliferation, and excessive production of various inflammatory cytokines31 in ischemic brain regions. In addition, roscovitine has been suggested as a neuroprotective agent in rodent models of focal cerebral ischemia30,32. Moreover, systemic administration of roscovitine can significantly decrease total infarct volume when it is administered either before or after ischemia onset32. In present study, treatment with roscovitine effectively protected CA1 pyramidal neurons from TCI. However, little is known about the change of Cdk5 expression after TCI. O’Hare et al. have reporetd that activation of Cdk5 can lead to translocation of Cdk5 from intracellular membrane to cytoplasm or nucleus33. In the present study, Cdk5 immunoreactivity was localized predominantly to the periphery of the cytoplasm of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the sham group, meaning that Cdk5 was localized to the intracellular membrane of CA1 pyramidal neurons, based on the report of O’Hare et al.33. In the TCI group, Cdk5 was found only within the nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons at 1–2 days after TCI while its protein level in the nuclear fraction was significantly increased. However, Cdk5 expression in the nuclei of neurons was abolished by treatment with roscovitine or IPC. Instead, Cdk5 was shown throughout the cytoplasm. Our present finding strongly suggests that neuronal cell death after cerebral ischemia might be associated with Cdk5 activation.

For neuronal death, it has been reported that nuclear Cdk5 activity can enhance neuronal cell death in in vitro models of excitotoxicity33 and in a Parkinson’s disease model induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl 1,2,3,6 tetrahydropyridine34. It is clear that nuclear Cdk5 activity can facilitate neuronal cell death in cerebral ischemia35,36. However, Cdk5 in the cytoplasm must play dual roles in death/survival of cells. For instance, it has been reported that Cdk5 within cytoplasm can mediate excitotoxicity by phosphorylating peroxiredoxin 2 under ischemic conditions37. In contrast, O’Hare et al. have reported that cytoplasmic Cdk5 can promote survival following DNA damage and suggested that cytoplasmic Cdk5 displays a pro-survival role under normal conditions33. In this regard, our present finding of Cdk5 immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of CA1 pyramidal neurons in both roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups indicates that the roscovitine- and IPC-mediated cytoplasmic localization of Cdk5 following TCI might play a role in neuronal survival. Our results strongly suggest that cytoplasmic activity of Cdk5 might be normal or pathogenic while nuclear activity of Cdk5 might be pathogenic.

It is well known that Cdk5 must bind to p35 to perform its function12. However, p35 is cleaved into p25 under a variety of pathological conditions13. Hayashi et al. have reported that immunoreactivities of both Cdk5 and p35 are increased in penumbra region following transient focal cerebral ischemia and that p25 expression is increased in infarcted region in rats38. In particular, some researchers have demonstrated that accumulation of p25 after transient cerebral ischemia can activate Cdk5 which induces hippocampal CA1 cell death by directly phosphorylating NMDA receptors15. In the present study, p25 was increased while p35 was down-regulated in CA1 pyramidal neurons following TCI. In detail, p25 level of the nuclear fraction was significantly increased at 1–2 days after TCI while its level was significantly down-regulated at 1–2 days after TCI by roscovitine treatment and IPC. It is reasonable to understand that upregulation of p25 is relevant to abnormal activation of Cdk5 which might be associated with neuronal death following ischemia-reperfusion injury. On the other hand, in this study, roscovitine treatment and IPC significantly decreased the elevation of p25 expression and simultaneously inhibited the down-regulation of p35 following TCI. Taken together, our present findings suggest that TCI can cause up-regulation of p25 by increasing the cleavage of p35, resulting in over-activation of Cdk5 which might be a key process that leads to neuronal cell death following TCI.

Some researchers have reported that roscovitine can protect neurons in models of spinal ischemic damage, stroke, and traumatic brain injury, showing that roscovitine can significantly decrease the expression of Cdk5/p25 complex36,37. In addition, Menn et al. have reporetd that permanent focal cerebral ischemia can induce an increase in Cdk5/p25 activity that leads to irreversible cell damage and cell death while systemic administration of roscovitine can prevent such increase of Cdk5/p25 activity32. This provides direct evidence linking roscovitine-mediated neuroprotection to Cdk5-dependent mechanisms. Therefore, inhibiting cleavage of p35 to p25 might have potential as a therapeutic strategy for cerebral ischemia injury36. Some data have suggested that phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein could be mediated through Cdk5 pathway. Rb phosphorylation at Ser807/811 has been reported as a substrate of aberrant Cdk5/p25 in injured neurons39. Phosphorylation of Rb protein is an early event in p25/Cdk5-induced neurotoxicity40. In addition, p25/Cdk5 is detected in nuclei of degenerating neurons41. It can interact with nuclear substrates17,23. In agreement with these findings, our experiments showed nuclear localization of p25 and Cdk5. Moreover, pRb level was significantly increased at 1–2 days after TCI while Rb phosphorylation disappeared after roscovitine treatment and IPC. These data suggest that TCI can induce aberrant Cdk5/p25 activation which then leads to increased phosphorylation of Rb protein.

In cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, p53 has been identified as one of critical inducers of neuronal death. For instance, compounds that can cause DNA damage are known to induce p53 activation in cultured neurons whereas NF-κB activity is decreased significantly42. In addition, pifithrin-α, a p53 inhibitor, can preserve NF-κB activity and protect neurons from transient brain ischemic injury43. Furthermore, neuroprotection and functional recovery after ischemia-reperfusion insults have been demonstrated via knockout or inhibition of p53 in animal models of ischemia-reperfusion44,45. In our present study, immunohistochemical analysis showed strong p53 immunoreactivity in nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons at 1 and 2 days after TCI while roscovitine treatment and IPC significantly decreased p-p53 expression in the nuclei and protected CA1 pyramidal neurons from TCI. This finding is supported by studies showing that IPC can lead to a decrease of p53 level and neuronal resistance to subsequent ischemia46. Our present results strongly suggest that the detrimental effect of p53 following TCI is associated with p53 expression in nuclei of damaged neurons.

Here, we will discuss the relationship between Cdk5 and p53 in cell damage. Zhang et al. have reporetd that p53 and Cdk5 levels are increased concomitantly in apoptotic PC12 cells and that Cdk5/p25 can effectively phosphorylates recombinant p53. In addition, transient transfection of Cdk5/p25 into cells can increase p53 level that is functionally active23. Lee and Kim have reported that increased Cdk5 activity can induce neuronal death by regulating p53 expression in cerebral cortical neurons in a mouse model of DNA damage and that inhibition of Cdk5 activity by roscovitine treatment can dramatically block p53 phosphorylation in damaged neurons47. Leker et al. have reporetd that, although p53 has a short half-life and its activity maintains at low level under no stress, resident p53 translocation into nuclei and binding to its specific DNA sites are early events in p53-induced apoptosis in neurons following ischemic insults. They have suggested that prevention of p53 translocation could reduce brain damage48.

Accumulating evidence has suggested that phosphorylation pattern of p53 at various sites is critical for the regulation of cell death which depends on cell type and extracellular stimuli. p53 protein can be phosphorylated at a minimum of 20 Ser/Thr residues within its N- and C-terminal regions4951. DNA damage can induce phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and Ser20, leading to reduced interaction of p53 with its negative regulator HDM2 which consequently leads to p53 accumulation52,53. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 (HIPK2) can phosphorylate Ser46 in response to UV radiation and drive an apoptotic response54. Dual specificity protein phosphatase 26 (DUSP26) can regulate p53-mediated apoptosis in high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) and contributes to chemoresistance by inhibiting p53 function. Shi et al.55 have demonstrated that DUSP26 can physically bind to p53, dephosphorylate p53 at Ser37, and cause inhibition of downstream p53 signaling. In addition, Lee et al.56 have reported that Cdk5 can phosphorylate p53 on Ser15, Ser33 and Ser46 in vitro and that increased Cdk5 activity in the nucleus can mediate phosphorylation events in response to genotoxic and oxidative stresses. In the present study, we showed that p53 phosphorylation at Ser37 was significantly enhanced in nuclei of CA1 pyramidal neurons at 1 and 2 days after TCI, coinciding with changes in Cdk5 level and immunoreactivity. Thus, the change of p-p53 expression at Ser37 in cellular nucleus might occur as a consequence of Cdk5 kinase activity. Although there are many studies on phosphorylation of p53, physiological roles of p53 phosphorylation at specific sites remain unclear. Furthermore, in vivo studies on protein kinases that can modulate the phosphorylation state and function of p53 have not been reported yet. Our findings strongly suggest that p53 is a direct substrate for Cdk5, although expression patterns of Cdk5 and p53 in IPC-induced brain following a subsequent TCI remain unclear.

p53 can mediate apoptosis through transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic genes including Bax and PUMA57. PUMA can inhibit the function of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and induce the release of pro-apoptotic Bax58. Niizuma et al. have shown that PUMA is up-regulated to bound to Bax in CA1 pyramidal neurons after global brain ischemia and that PUMA upregulation is inhibited by pifithrin-α. They have suggested that PUMA is controlled by p53 transcriptional pathway after global cerebral ischemia59. In addition, Ren et al. have reporeted that PUMA can initiate apoptosis via Bax after neutralizing all members of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 like molecules60. In the present study, Bax and PUMA levels were increased while Bcl-2 level was decreased in the CA1 area after TCI. These changes were inhibited by roscovitine treatment or IPC. Moreover, in the present study, proteolytic activation of the caspase-3 was significantly increased in the CA1 area at 1–2 days after TCI while the increase of caspase-3 was inhibited by roscovitine treatment or IPC. It has been reported that caspase-3 is an important component in p53-induced apoptosis61 and that caspase-3 activation is involved in apoptotic neuronal death in the brain following cerebral ischemia62,63. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that genetic deletion and pharmacological inhibition of caspases can exert neuroprotective effects against cerebral ischemic insults64. Taken together, our results suggest that IPC can prevent TCI-mediated apoptosis in CA1 pyramidal neurons through p53-mediated PUMA signaling pathway.

In the present study, TUNEL+ cells were found in CA1 pyramidal neurons at 5 days after TCI. However, TUNEL+ cells were significantly decreased in roscovitine + TCI and IPC + TCI groups compared to those in the TCI group. Sandal et al. have reported that Cdk5 activation can occur by activation of upstream caspase-3. They argued that Cdk5 activity needed cleavage of pro-enzyme caspase-3 to its active form in cAMP-induced apoptosis of leukemia cells65. Taken together, our present finding suggests that Cdk5-dependent p53 regulation can promote apoptosis via caspase-3. This encourages us to speculate that Cdk5 is one of key factors that facilitate neuronal apoptosis via p53 activation after ischemic insults.

In summary, our present findings showed that roscovitine treatment and IPC clearly protected CA1 pyramidal neurons from a subsequent severer TCI and that roscovitine- and IPC-mediated neuroprotection were closely associated with down-regulation of Cdk5 and p25. In addition, down-regulation of Cdk5 by roscovitine treatment and IPC might be a key factor in attenuating p53-dependent apoptosis after TCI. Our results strongly suggest that down-regulation of Cdk5 is critical in neuroprotection as well as IPC-mediated tolerance against various ischemic insults.

Methods

Experimental groups

Male Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea. They were 6-month old and 65–75 g in body weight. Animal handling and care went after the guidelines of current international laws and policies from the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (The National Academies Press, 8th Ed., 2011). The experimental protocols were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Kangwon National University (approval no. KW-160802-1). As previously described66, gerbils were divided into 6 groups (n = 14 at each point in time in each group): (1) sham TCI-operated group (sham group) was given no ischemia; (2) TCI-operated group (TCI group) was given a 5 min of TCI; (3) Roscovitine (a potent inhibitor of Cdk5)-treated and sham TCI-operated group (roscovitine + sham group) was intraperitoneally injected roscovitine; (4) Roscovitine-treated and TCI-operated group (roscovitine + TCI group) was subjected to TCI after roscovitine treatment; (5) IPC-treated and sham TCI-operated group (IPC + sham group) was subjected to IPC, which was induced by a 2 min of transient ischemia, and given no TCI; and (6) IPC + TCI group was subjected to TCI following IPC.

Treatment of roscovitine

To examine whether roscovitine inhibited Cdk5 in the hippocampus induced by TCI, roscovitine (40 mg/kg; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, R7772) was intraperitoneally injected 60 min prior to sham or TCI operation.

Surgery of IPC and TCI

Transient ischemia was developed according to our published procedure67. In brief, the experimental animals were anesthetized with a mixture of 2.5% isoflurane in 33% oxygen and 67% nitrous oxide. Ischemic insults were induced by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion. A 2 min and a 5 min of occlusion were carried out for IPC and TCI, respectively. Normothermic (37 ± 0.5 °C) condition was maintained before, during and after the ischemic surgery until the animals completely recovered from anesthesia.

Sacrifice of animals

IPC paradigm has been proven to be very effective at protection of neurons from transient ischemic injury in this ischemic model67. The gerbils in all groups were given recovery times of 1, 2 and 5 days after ischemia, because pyramidal neurons in the hippocampal CA1 area do not die until about 3 days and begin to die at about 4 days after a 5 min of TCI68.

Western blot analyses

The nuclear and cytosolic fractions were prepared as previously described69, and western blot analyses for Cdk5, p35/25, p-Rb, p-p53, Bax, Bcl-2, PUMA and caspase-3 (inactive and active form) in the ischemic CA1 area (n = 7/group) were done according to our previous method33. Briefly, the tissues were homogenized, and protein levels in the supernatants were determined using a Micro BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). The membranes were incubated with rabbit anti-Cdk5 (1:1,000 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), rabbit anti-p35/25 (1:1,000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), rabbit anti-Rb (1:1,000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-Rb (phospho Ser807/811) (1:1,000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-p53 (1:1,000 dilution, Abcam), rabbit anti-p53 (phospho Ser37) (1:1,000 dilution, Abcam), rabbit anti-Bax (1:1,500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), mouse anti-Bcl-2 (1:1,500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), mouse anti-PUMA (1:1,500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), rabbit anti-caspase-3 (1:1,000 dilution, Abcam), rabbit anti-active caspase-3 (1:1,000 dilution, Abcam), rabbit anti-lamin B (1:1,500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), mouse anti-α-tubulin (1:1,000 dilution, Abcam), and mouse anti-β-actin (1:2,000 dilution, Sigma-Aldrich). Finally, the immunoreactive bands were visualized by an ECL kit (Pierce Biotechnology).

Tissue processing for histology

According to our published procedure for histology66, in brief, animals (n = 7 in each group) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg; JW Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) and perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde and their hippocampal tissues were serially cut into 30-μm coronal sections.

CV staining

To examine cellular distribution and damage, CV staining was performed by our published procedure66. In brief, cresyl violet acetate (Sigma–Aldrich) was dissolved at 1.0% (w/v), and glacial acetic acid (0.28%) was added to this solution. The sections were stained and dehydrated.

F-J B histofluorescence staining

To examine neuronal degeneration, F-J B (a high affinity fluorescent marker for the localization of neurodegeneration) staining was performed according to our published procedure70. Briefly, the sections were immersed in a solution containing 1% sodium hydroxide, transferred to a solution of 0.06% potassium permanganate and then a 0.0004% Fluoro-Jade B (Histochem, Jefferson, AR, USA) solution. After washing, the sections were placed on a slide warmer (approximately 50 °C), and examined using an epifluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) with blue (450–490 nm) excitation light and a barrier filter.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was carried out according to our published procedure66. In short, the sections were incubated with primary mouse anti-neuronal nuclei (NeuN, a neuron-specific soluble nuclear antigen) (diluted 1:1,000, Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA), rabbit anti-Cdk5 (diluted 1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit anti-Rb (phospho Ser807/811) (1:100 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology), and rabbit anti-p53 (phospho Ser37) (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Theses sections were next incubated with secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA) and developed using Vectastain ABC (Vector Laboratories Inc.). And they were visualized with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine.

Double immunofluorescence staining

To confirm whether Cdk5 immunoreactivity is translocated to nuclei or not following TCI, the sections were assessed via DAPI staining at 1 day after the ischemic surgery. Cdk5 immunofluorescence staining was performed using rabbit anti-Cdk5 (diluted 1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.). The sections were incubated in the primary antibody overnight at room temperature. After washing 3 times for 10 min with PBS, these sections were then incubated in Cy3-conjugated horse anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.) for 2 h at room temperature. They were then stained with DAPI (10 μM) for 10 min at room temperature in the dark, and then rinsed thoroughly in PBS. The immunoreactions were observed under the confocal MS (LSM510 META NLO, Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).

TUNEL staining

TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl dUTP nick-end labeling) staining was carried out according to our published procedure71. In brief, frozen 8-μm coronal sections of the CA1 area were incubated in TUNEL reaction mixture according to kit instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and The TUNEL reaction incubated in converter-POD (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Finally, they were treated with DAB-substrate solution.

Data analysis

To count cells according to our published method66, in short, digital images from 15 sections per animal were taken using light microscope (AxioM1, Carl Zeiss) equipped with digital camera (Axiocam, Carl Zeiss) connected to a PC monitor. Cells were counted in a 200 × 200 µm square including the stratum pyramidale at the center of the CA1 area using an image analyzing system (software: Optimas 6.5, CyberMetrics, Scottsdale, AZ). Cell counts were obtained by averaging the counts from each animal. To analyze immunoreactivity, according to our previous method66, briefly, images of the immunoreactive structures were captured like the above-described method. The density of the immunoreactive structures was evaluated based on optical density (OD), which was obtained after the transformation of the mean gray level using the formula: OD = log (256/mean gray level). Background density in images was subtracted, and brightness and contrast were calibrated as % (relative optical density, ROD) using Adobe Photoshop version 8.0 and then analyzed using NIH Image J software. A ratio of the ROD was calibrated as %, with sham group designated as 100%. According to our published method66, results of western blot analyses were scanned and densitometric analyses for the quantification of the bands was done using Scion Image software (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD, USA). The expression rates of the target proteins were normalized through the corresponding expression rates of β-actin.

Statistical analysis

Sample size was at least seven rats per group with an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of >80%, and the sample size was calculated with power calculator. All data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. A multiple-sample comparison was applied to test the differences between groups (ANOVA and the Tukey multiple range test as post hoc test using the criterion of the least significant differences). Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Seung Uk Lee for their technical help in this study. This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF funded by the Korean government, MSIP (NRF-2015M3A9B6066835), by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT &Future Planning (NRF-2017R1A2B4009079), by the Bio-Synergy Research Project (NRF-2015M3A9C4076322) of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning through the National Research Foundation, and supported by the Bio-Synergy Research Project (NRF-2018M3A9C4076478) of the Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation.

Author Contributions

M.H.W. and J.C.L. were responsible for experimental design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing. B.N.S., D.W.K., I.H.K., T.K.L., J.H.P. and J.H.A. performed the experiments. Y.M.K., I.J.K., Y.L.L., C.H.L., I.K.H. and S.R. performed data analysis and critical comments on the whole process of this study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Bich Na Shin and Dae Won Kim contributed equally.

Contributor Information

Moo-Ho Won, Email: mhwon@kangwon.ac.kr.

Jae-Chul Lee, Email: anajclee@kangwon.ac.kr.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-49623-x.

References

  • 1.Pulsinelli WA, Brierley JB, Plum F. Temporal profile of neuronal damage in a model of transient forebrain ischemia. Ann Neurol. 1982;11:491–498. doi: 10.1002/ana.410110509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wegener S, et al. Transient ischemic attacks before ischemic stroke: preconditioning the human brain? A multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2004;35:616–621. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000115767.17923.6A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moncayo J, de Freitas GR, Bogousslavsky J, Altieri M, van Melle G. Do transient ischemic attacks have a neuroprotective effect? Neurology. 2000;54:2089–2094. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.10.1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dhodda VK, Sailor KA, Bowen KK, Vemuganti R. Putative endogenous mediators of preconditioning-induced ischemic tolerance in rat brain identified by genomic and proteomic analysis. J Neurochem. 2004;89:73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stenzel-Poore MP, Stevens SL, King JS, Simon RP. Preconditioning reprograms the response to ischemic injury and primes the emergence of unique endogenous neuroprotective phenotypes: a speculative synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:680–685. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000251444.56487.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stagliano NE, Perez-Pinzon MA, Moskowitz MA, Huang PL. Focal ischemic preconditioning induces rapid tolerance to middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:757–761. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199907000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kardesoglu E, Isilak Z, Uz O, Yiginer O. Ischemic conditioning: a current concept in reducing reperfusion injury. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:480. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199907000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dhavan R, Tsai LH. A decade of CDK5. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:749–759. doi: 10.1038/35096019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Asada A, et al. Myristoylation of p39 and p35 is a determinant of cytoplasmic or nuclear localization of active cyclin-dependent kinase 5 complexes. J Neurochem. 2008;106:1325–1336. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meyer DA, et al. Ischemic stroke injury is mediated by aberrant Cdk5. J Neurosci. 2014;34:8259–8267. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4368-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Green SL, Kulp KS, Vulliet R. Cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5 activity increases in rat brain following ischemia. Neurochem Int. 1997;31:617–623. doi: 10.1016/S0197-0186(97)00012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tsai LH, Delalle I, Caviness VS, Jr., Chae T, Harlow E. p35 is a neural-specific regulatory subunit of cyclin-dependent kinase 5. Nature. 1994;371:419–423. doi: 10.1038/371419a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopes JP, Agostinho P. Cdk5: multitasking between physiological and pathological conditions. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;94:49–63. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee MS, et al. Neurotoxicity induces cleavage of p35 to p25 by calpain. Nature. 2000;405:360–364. doi: 10.1038/35012636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang J, Liu S, Fu Y, Wang JH, Lu Y. Cdk5 activation induces hippocampal CA1 cell death by directly phosphorylating NMDA receptors. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1039–1047. doi: 10.1038/nn1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tian F, Xu LH, Wang B, Tian LJ, Ji XL. The neuroprotective mechanism of puerarin in the treatment of acute spinal ischemia-reperfusion injury is linked to cyclin-dependent kinase 5. Neurosci Lett. 2015;584:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gong X, et al. Cdk5-mediated inhibition of the protective effects of transcription factor MEF2 in neurotoxicity-induced apoptosis. Neuron. 2003;38:33–46. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ahuja HS, Zhu Y, Zakeri Z. Association of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and its activator p35 with apoptotic cell death. Dev Genet. 1997;21:258–267. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morrison RS, Kinoshita Y. The role of p53 in neuronal cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2000;7:868–879. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choisy-Rossi C, Yonish-Rouach E. Apoptosis and the cell cycle: the p53 connection. Cell Death Differ. 1998;5:129–131. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Prunell GF, Arboleda VA, Troy CM. Caspase function in neuronal death: delineation of the role of caspases in ischemia. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2005;4:51–61. doi: 10.2174/1568007053005082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cregan SP, et al. Bax-dependent caspase-3 activation is a key determinant in p53-induced apoptosis in neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7860–7869. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-07860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang J, Krishnamurthy PK, Johnson GV. Cdk5 phosphorylates p53 and regulates its activity. J Neurochem. 2002;81:307–313. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim JY, Park J, Chang JY, Kim SH, Lee JE. Inflammation after Ischemic Stroke: The Role of Leukocytes and Glial Cells. Exp Neurobiol. 2016;25:241–251. doi: 10.5607/en.2016.25.5.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lehotsky J, et al. Ischemic tolerance: the mechanisms of neuroprotective strategy. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2009;292:2002–2012. doi: 10.1002/ar.20970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gidday JM. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:437–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rashidian J, Iyirhiaro GO, Park DS. Cell cycle machinery and stroke. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1772:484–493. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mitsios N, et al. Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 mRNA and protein in the human brain following acute ischemic stroke. Brain Pathol. 2007;17:11–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.00031.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tan X, et al. The inhibition of Cdk5 activity after hypoxia/ischemia injury reduces infarct size and promotes functional recovery in neonatal rats. Neuroscience. 2015;290:552–560. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wen Y, et al. Cdk5 is involved in NFT-like tauopathy induced by transient cerebral ischemia in female rats. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1772:473–483. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2006.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang Q, et al. Cell cycle inhibition attenuates microglial proliferation and production of IL-1beta, MIP-1alpha, and NO after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Glia. 2009;57:908–920. doi: 10.1002/glia.20816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Menn B, et al. Delayed treatment with systemic (S)-roscovitine provides neuroprotection and inhibits in vivo CDK5 activity increase in animal stroke models. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.O’Hare MJ, et al. Differential roles of nuclear and cytoplasmic cyclin-dependent kinase 5 in apoptotic and excitotoxic neuronal death. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8954–8966. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith PD, et al. Calpain-regulated p35/cdk5 plays a central role in dopaminergic neuron death through modulation of the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2. J Neurosci. 2006;26:440–447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2875-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Timsit S, Menn B. Cerebral ischemia, cell cycle elements and Cdk5. Biotechnol J. 2007;2:958–966. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Slevin M, Krupinski J. Cyclin-dependent kinase-5 targeting for ischaemic stroke. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rashidian J, et al. Essential role of cytoplasmic cdk5 and Prx2 in multiple ischemic injury models, in vivo. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12497–12505. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3892-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hayashi T, Warita H, Abe K, Itoyama Y. Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and its activator p35 in rat brain after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neurosci Lett. 1999;265:37–40. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Panickar KS, Nonner D, White MG, Barrett JN. Overexpression of Cdk5 or non-phosphorylatable retinoblastoma protein protects septal neurons from oxygen-glucose deprivation. Neurochem Res. 2008;33:1852–1858. doi: 10.1007/s11064-008-9647-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hamdane M, et al. p25/Cdk5-mediated retinoblastoma phosphorylation is an early event in neuronal cell death. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1291–1298. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Patrick GN, et al. Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration. Nature. 1999;402:615–622. doi: 10.1038/45159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Culmsee C, et al. Reciprocal inhibition of p53 and nuclear factor-kappaB transcriptional activities determines cell survival or death in neurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8586–8595. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-24-08586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cui DR, et al. Propofol prevents cerebral ischemia-triggered autophagy activation and cell death in the rat hippocampus through the NF-kappaB/p53 signaling pathway. Neuroscience. 2013;246:117–132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Luo Y, et al. Delayed treatment with a p53 inhibitor enhances recovery in stroke brain. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:520–530. doi: 10.1002/ana.21592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yonekura I, Takai K, Asai A, Kawahara N, Kirino T. p53 potentiates hippocampal neuronal death caused by global ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1332–1340. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Racay P, Tatarkova Z, Drgova A, Kaplan P, Dobrota D. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial p53 translocation after transient global cerebral ischemia in rats. Neurochem Res. 2007;32:1823–1832. doi: 10.1007/s11064-007-9437-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lee JH, Kim KT. Regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and p53 by ERK1/2 pathway in the DNA damage-induced neuronal death. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210:784–797. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Leker RR, Aharonowiz M, Greig NH, Ovadia H. The role of p53-induced apoptosis in cerebral ischemia: effects of the p53 inhibitor pifithrin alpha. Exp Neurol. 2004;187:478–486. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Culmsee C, Mattson MP. p53 in neuronal apoptosis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2005;331:761–777. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee SJ, Kim DC, Choi BH, Ha H, Kim KT. Regulation of p53 by activated protein kinase C-delta during nitric oxide-induced dopaminergic cell death. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281:2215–2224. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509509200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vega FM, Sevilla A, Lazo PA. p53 Stabilization and accumulation induced by human vaccinia-related kinase 1. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004;24:10366–10380. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.23.10366-10380.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shieh SY, Taya Y, Prives C. DNA damage-inducible phosphorylation of p53 at N-terminal sites including a novel site, Ser20, requires tetramerization. The EMBO journal. 1999;18:1815–1823. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.7.1815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xu Y. Regulation of p53 responses by post-translational modifications. Cell death and differentiation. 2003;10:400–403. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.D’Orazi G, et al. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis. Nature cell biology. 2002;4:11–19. doi: 10.1038/ncb714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shi Y, et al. NSC-87877 inhibits DUSP26 function in neuroblastoma resulting in p53-mediated apoptosis. Cell death & disease. 2015;6:e1841. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lee JH, Kim HS, Lee SJ, Kim KT. Stabilization and activation of p53 induced by Cdk5 contributes to neuronal cell death. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2259–2271. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Green DR, Kroemer G. Cytoplasmic functions of the tumour suppressor p53. Nature. 2009;458:1127–1130. doi: 10.1038/nature07986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Steckley D, et al. Puma is a dominant regulator of oxidative stress induced Bax activation and neuronal apoptosis. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12989–12999. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3400-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Niizuma K, Endo H, Nito C, Myer DJ, Chan PH. Potential role of PUMA in delayed death of hippocampal CA1 neurons after transient global cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2009;40:618–625. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ren D, et al. BID, BIM, and PUMA are essential for activation of the BAX- and BAK-dependent cell death program. Science. 2010;330:1390–1393. doi: 10.1126/science.1190217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Inamura N, Enokido Y, Hatanaka H. Involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and caspase 3-like protease in DNA damage-induced, p53-mediated apoptosis of cultured mouse cerebellar granule neurons. Brain Res. 2001;904:270–278. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02472-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Namura S, et al. Activation and cleavage of caspase-3 in apoptosis induced by experimental cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3659–3668. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Le DA, et al. Caspase activation and neuroprotection in caspase-3- deficient mice after in vivo cerebral ischemia and in vitro oxygen glucose deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15188–15193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232473399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Endres M, et al. Attenuation of delayed neuronal death after mild focal ischemia in mice by inhibition of the caspase family. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18:238–247. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199803000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sandal T, Stapnes C, Kleivdal H, Hedin L, Doskeland SO. A novel, extraneuronal role for cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5 (CDK5): modulation of cAMP-induced apoptosis in rat leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:20783–20793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112248200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lee JC, et al. Ischemic preconditioning protects hippocampal pyramidal neurons from transient ischemic injury via the attenuation of oxidative damage through upregulating heme oxygenase-1. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;79:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nakamura H, et al. Effect of ischemic preconditioning on cerebral blood flow after subsequent lethal ischemia in gerbils. Life Sci. 2006;78:1713–1719. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kirino T, Sano K. Selective vulnerability in the gerbil hippocampus following transient ischemia. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;62:201–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00691853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Stanojlovic M, et al. Effects of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and low-dose progesterone treatment on apoptotic processes, expression and subcellular localization of key elements within Akt and Erk signaling pathways in rat hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2015;311:308–321. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Schmued LC, Hopkins KJ. Fluoro-Jade B: a high affinity fluorescent marker for the localization of neuronal degeneration. Brain Res. 2000;874:123–130. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02513-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hwang IK, et al. Changes in the expression of mitochondrial peroxiredoxin and thioredoxin in neurons and glia and their protective effects in experimental cerebral ischemic damage. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:1242–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES