Abstract
Background:
This study was carried out to evaluate the epidemiological studies of trichinellosis in five states of North East India from Apr 2016 to Dec 2017.
Methods:
Overall, 865 different meat samples for detection of Trichinella larvae and 1580 sera samples for detection of anti-Trichinella antibody were collected. Intensity of infection with Trichinella larvae in meat was determined by HCL: Pepsin digestion procedure and anti-Trichinella IgG in serum were detected using excretory/secretory antigens, according to validated ELISA.
Results:
No Trichinella larva was detected by HCL: Pepsin digestion method. However, four (0.25%) samples were seropositive for Trichinella IgG and four inconclusive results as per cut off value. The highest seroprevalence was observed in Meghalaya (0.41%) followed by Assam (0.27%) whereas no seropositive cases were recorded in Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Tripura.
Conclusion:
Trichinellosis is common in North East, India. However, it is suspected in communities where more than 75% of the population relish pork. Finally, there is a need for more research to establish the facts of trichinellosis in this region. Thus, public awareness, food hygiene, monitoring, and surveillance programme are suggested to implement for prevention of trichinellosis in this region.
Keywords: Trichinellosis, Porcine, Sero-prevalence, India
Introduction
Trichinellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by nematode worms of the genus Trichinella (1) and occurs worldwide and infects all vertebrates including humans (2). Although infection with Trichinella is globally distributed (3), it has been documented rarely in India (4).
To date, nine species and three genotypes have been recognized within the Trichinella genus (5). The parasite has a direct life cycle with wide host range, which includes humans, pigs, wild boar (6), rats, horses, bear, walruses, some birds and reptiles (1). Several factors like socioeconomic background, cultural habits, political factors, geographic location, migration of humans and animals have a serious bearing on the epidemiology of trichinellosis in humans and animals (1,7, 8). Infection in pigs is perpetuated by swill feeding, eating infected rodent carcasses, tail-biting, infestation by faces from freshly infected animals or feeding on nonsterilized human food residuals (9). Farm management practices play an important role in the outbreak of trichinellosis in pig farms (10, 11).
The consumption of Trichinella spp. infected pork and wild boar meat are primarily responsible for human infections (12). To a lesser extent, human trichinellosis could result from the consumption of other domestic animals (e.g. horses, dogs, and sheep) and wild animals (e.g. walrus, bear, deer, etc.) (2). Synanthropic animals such as rats are regarded as an important reservoir of infection to the scavenging pigs.
Ingestion of the infected meat is known to be the sole route of transmission between infected and susceptible animals (13). Therefore, meat of domestic and wild animals must always be considered as a potential source of Trichinella infection to humans (14).
In India, human trichinellosis remained a neglected zoonosis (15) with sporadic cases until 2012 (16, 17). However, the presence of Trichinella has been conclusively shown by the different works of another investigator, who isolated Trichinella from cats, rodents and domestic pigs, respectively (18, 19).
However, there is a dearth of report regarding the epidemiological studies of porcine trichinellosis in northeast India. Hence, the present study was carried out to investigate the epidemiological status of trichinellosis in pigs in Assam, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Tripura, five northeastern states of India.
Materials and Methods
Study design
This study was carried out on the pig population in five states of North East India from Apr 2016 to Dec 2017, which comprised of eight states. This region covers an area of 38076 km2 with the pig population of nearly 30 lakhs as per 19th livestock census-2012 all India report (20).
Sample collection
Overall, 865 samples of lower jaw (masseter muscles), diaphragm (lumbar and coastal parts), tongue and filet (musculus longissimus dorsi) for detection of Trichinella larvae in meat and 1580 blood samples for detection of anti-Trichinella antibody were collected aseptically from Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura (Fig. 1). The blood samples were collected in an evacuated tube, allowed to clot at room temperature and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10–15 min at room temperature. The serum was then transferred to 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and stored at −20 °C until analysis.
Fig. 1:
Map showing Assam, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Tripura in North East India (Map not to scale)
Detection of Trichinella larvae in meat
The intensity of infection with Trichinella spp. larvae in meat were determined by pepsin digestion procedure as per OIE recommendation (21). In brief, 100 g minced muscle sample (20 g per pig) was digested using an artificial digestive fluid consisting of 1% pepsin–HCl solution. If the larvae were detected, then individual pig tissue samples were to be separately digested. The larvae were further separated using the double separatory funnel method. Overall, 10 ml of sediment fluid was transferred into a gridded petri dish and examined under a stereomicroscope.
Detection of anti-Trichinella antibodies in porcine sera
Porcine serum samples were tested to detect anti-Trichinella IgG using excretory/secretory antigens, according to validated in-house ELISA (22). The lyophilized T. spiralis excretory/secretory antigen gifted from International Trichinella Reference Centre, Rome, Italy was used as positive and negative controls.
Results
Trichinella larvae in different meat samples
Different meat market and slaughterhouse survey were carried out for the collection of samples (tongue and diaphragm) (Fig. 2). No Trichinella larva was detected by HCL: Pepsin digestion method. For confirmation samples were again revalidated in Bombay Veterinary College, Mumbai, Maharastra and result were found similar.
Fig. 2:

Tongue and diaphragm of pig collected from different meat markets and slaughterhouses
Seroprevalence of anti-Trichinella antibodies in porcine sera
Totally, 1580 pig serum samples were analyzed by ELISA for Trichinella. Overall seroprevalence was 0.25% and four inconclusive results as per cut off value (Table 1). The highest prevalence was observed in Meghalaya (0.41%) followed by Assam (0.27%). In Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram and Tripura no seropositive cases were recorded. These samples were again revalidated in Bombay Veterinary College, Mumbai, Maharastra, and result were found similar.
Table 1:
Sero-Prevalence rate of Trichinellosis in pigs of different stated/districts of North East India
| State | District | no. of pig serum | Sero Positive (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kamrup | 203 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Baska | 77 | 1 (1.30) | |
| Nagaon | 96 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Morigaon | 78 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Assam | Jorhat | 88 | 0 (0.00) |
| Sivsagar | 53 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Dibrugarh | 166 | 1 (0.60) | |
| Tinsukia | 172 | 0 (0.00) | |
| North Lakhimpur | 81 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Dhemaji | 112 | 1 (0.89) | |
| Total | 1126 | 3 (0.27) | |
| Jayantia Hills Division | 124 | 1 (0.81) | |
| Meghalaya | Khasi Hills Division (Ribhoi, East & West KH) | 118 | 0 (0.00) |
| Total | 242 | 1 (0.41) | |
| Subansiri | 61 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Arunachal Pradesh | Papum pare | 54 | 0 (0.00) |
| Total | 115 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Aizawl | 30 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Mizoram | Kolasib | 25 | 0 (0.00) |
| Total | 55 | 0 (0.00) | |
| West Tripura | 30 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Tripura | Khowai | 12 | 0 (0.00) |
| Total | 42 | 0 (0.00) | |
| Total | 1580 | 4 (0.25) |
Discussion
The seroprevalence of trichinellosis in North East States of India was observed as 0.25%, whereas Trichinella larvae were not detected using pepsin–HCl digestion method. This might be due to fact that specificity of excretory-secretory (ES) antigen-based indirect ELISA has been reported to vary from 90.6% to 99.6% (23) or it may be due to low level of infection in seropositive pigs.
Moreover, the highest prevalence was observed in Meghalaya (0.41%) followed by Assam (0.27%). Findings of this study were different than that of the previous study where 38 pig serum samples were collected from Assam but none of the samples were found positive for Trichinella (4).
Many authors have used indirect ELISA for estimating sero-prevalence of trichinellosis (24, 25). The previous study reported a prevalence of 0.47% with western blot (26) and 1% with antibody ELISA on pig’s sera in Kathmandu, Nepal (27). Both studies suggest serological evidence of trichinellosis.
Previous studies indicate a low prevalence of swine trichinellosis in India. Studies conducted on slaughtered pig carcasses to isolate Trichinella spp. have revealed prevalence rate ranging from 0.4%–0.6% (18, 19). There are no reports of Trichinellosis from states like Bombay and Madras associated with swine carcasses (28, 29). In contrast, examination of pig diaphragm samples from Deonar abattoir, Mumbai by PCR assay revealed the prevalence of trichinellosis as 0.69% (30). Similarly, in another study, the prevalence of Trichinellosis using acid-pepsin digestion, PCR and ELISA were recorded to be 0.27%, 0.27% and 2.69% respectively (31).
The parasite is still a health and food safety problem for countries worldwide (32). As per Chapter 8.16 of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code for the importation of meat or meat products of domestic pigs, pork must be tested negative for Trichinella larvae or has to be processed to ensure the inactivation of Trichinella larvae in accordance with the recommendations of the Codex Alimentarius.
Human trichinellosis outbreaks following consumption of raw or undercooked wild boar meat were reported from the Uttarakhand state of India, where 11 deaths occurred from 70-suspected cases (33). Epidemiological studies in pigs in north India are required and the infection is likely to be under-diagnosed, and it is necessary to explore the existence of the parasite among domestic and wildlife reservoirs.
Conclusion
This study will be useful to cover the missing epidemiologic gaps related to porcine trichinellosis in North East India where more than 75% population relish pork as a protein supplement in cheaper rate. Trichinellosis remains a rare zoonosis in North East India. However, we recommend strict monitoring and surveillance programme to generate scientific baseline data to support pig industry of this region. Furthermore, this research will also help in capacity building workshop for detection of trichinellosis in large pig consumer. Widespread studies must be carried out in wild animals like walrus, bear, deer, wild hog, etc. to recognize the reservoir hosts in this part of the country.
Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi for funding the project “Outreach project on zoonotic diseases”. We thank Maria Angeles Gomez-Morales, International Trichinella Reference Centre, Rome, Italy for gifted us lyophilized Trichinella spiralis excretory/secretory antigen, Bombay Veterinary College, Mumbai, Maharastra for revalidated the samples and Director of Research (Veterinary), Assam Agricultural University for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work.
Footnotes
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
References
- 1.Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nöckler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009; 22(1):127–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rostami A, Gamble HR, Dupouy-Camet J, et al. Meat sources of infection for outbreaks of human trichinellosis. Food Microbiol. 2017; 64:65–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.FAO/WHO/OIE (2007) Management and diagnosis of human trichinellosis. In: Dupouy-Camet J, Murrell KD. (eds) FAO/WHO/OIE 2007 guidelines for surveillance, management, prevention and control of trichinellosis. FAO, WHO, OIE, Paris, France, pp 1–105. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Konwar P, Singh BB, Gill JPS. Epidemiological studies on trichinellosis in pigs (Sus scofa) in India. J Parasit Dis. 2017; 41(2): 487–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Korhonen PK, Pozio E, La Rosa G, et al. Phylogenomic and biogeographic reconstruction of the Trichinella complex. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rostami A, Khazan H, Kazemi B, et al. Prevalence of Trichinella spp. infections in hunted wild boars in northern Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2017; 46(12):1712–1719. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Djordjevic M, Bacic M, Petricevic M, Murrell KD, et al. Social, political and economic factors responsible for the re-emergence of trichinellosis in Serbia: a case study. J Parasitol. 2003; 89(2):226–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dupouy-Camet J, Murrell KD. Guidelines for the surveillance, management, prevention and control of trichinellosis. World Organization for Animal Health Press, Paris, France. Vet J. 2008; 177: 300–302. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Urquhart GM, Armour J, Duncan JL, et al. Veterinary parasitology, 2nd ed London: Blackwell Science; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gamble HR, Bush E. Seroprevalence of Trichinella infection in domestic swine based on the National Animal Health Monitoring System 1990 and 1995 swine surveys. Vet Parasitol. 1999; 80(4):303–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gamble HR, Brady RC, Bulaga LL, et al. Prevalence and risk association for Trichinella infection in domestic pigs in the northeastern United States. Vet Parasitol. 1999; 82(1):59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rostami A, Khazan H, Kia EB, et al. Molecular identification of Trichinella spp. in wild boar, and serological survey of high-risk populations in Iran. Food Control. 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pozio E, Darwin Murrell K. Systematics and epidemiology of Trichinella. Adv Parasitol. 2006; 63:367–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.OIE Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals, vol 2008. World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris: 2008; pp 344–352. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singh BB, Sharma R, Sharma JK, Juyal PD. Parasitic zoonoses in India—an overview. Rev Sci Tech. 2010; 29(3):629–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dubey ML, Khurana S, Singhal L, et al. Atypical trichinellosis without eosinophilia associated with osteomyelitis. Trop Doct. 2011; 41(4):244–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pebam S, Goni V, Patel S, et al. A 12-year-old child with trichinellosis, pyomyositis and secondary osteomyelitis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2012; 4(1):84–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Niphadkar SM, Pardhan MH, Deshpande VS. Rediscovery of Trichinella spiralis (Cox, 2002) in domestic pigs in India. Current Sci. 1979; 48(8): 372–373. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pethe RS. Observations of haematology, immune response and treatment of Trichinella spiralis in experimental animals. M.V.Sc. thesis approved by Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli. 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 20.19th livestock census-2012 all India report. Ministry of Agriculture Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi: http://dahd.nic.in/sites/default/filess/Livesto ck%20%205_0.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 21.OIE (2012) Trichinellosis. In: Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals 2012, Chapter 2.1.16. World Organization for Animal Health, Paris, pp 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gómez-Morales MA, Ludovisi A, Amati M, et al. Indirect versus direct detection methods of Trichinella spp. infection in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7:171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yang Y, Cai YN, Tong MW, et al. Serological tools for detection of Trichinella infection in animals and humans. One Health. 2016;2:25–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nockler K, Voigt WP, Protz D, et al. Intravitale Diagnostik der Trichinellose beim Schwein mit dem indirekten ELISA (indirect ELISA for the diagnosis of trichinellosis in living pigs). Berliner Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift. 1995; 108: 167–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gamble HR. Detection of trichinellosis in pigs by artificial digestion and enzyme immunoassay. J Food Prot. 1996; 59(3):295–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Joshi DD, Moller LN, Maharjan M, Kapel CM. Serological evidence of trichinellosis in local pigs of Nepal. Vet Parasitol. 2005; 132(1–2):155–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sapkotal, Hörchner F, Srikitjakarn L, et al. Seroprevalence of Trichinella in slaughter pigs in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006; 37(6):1078–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shastri UV. Helminth parasites of the domestic pig (Sus Scrofa Domestica) in Bombay (Maharashtra state). M.V.Sc. thesis approved by Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli; 1966. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ramamurthi R, Ranganathan M. A survey of incidence of trichinosis in pigs in Madras city. Indian Vet J. 1968; 45(9):740–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chethan kumar HB. Studies on incidence and molecular characterization of Trichinella spp. in pigs slaughtered at Deonar abattoir. M.V.Sc. thesis submitted to Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jundale DV. Prevalence of Trichinella spp. in Pigs Slaughtered in Maharashtra state. Thesis submitted to Maharashtra Anima and Fishery Sciences University (MAFSU), Nagpur; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gajadhar AA, Gamble HR. Historical perspectives and current global challenges of Trichinella and trichinellosis. Vet Parasitol. 2000; 93(3–4):183–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sethi B, Butola KS, Kumar Y, Mishra JP. Multiple outbreaks of trichinellosis with high mortality rate. Trop Doct. 2012; 42: 243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

