Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2019 Sep 11;2(9):e1912622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12622

Error in eFigure 1 in the Supplement

PMCID: PMC6739722  PMID: 31509202

In the Original Investigation titled “Cost-effectiveness of Housing First Intervention With Intensive Case Management Compared With Treatment as Usual for Homeless Adults With Mental Illness: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial,”1 published August 21, 2019, there were 2 incorrect numbers in eFigure 1 in the Supplement. The numbers excluded due to missing all Health, Social, and Justice Service Use data or all Residential Time-Line Follow-Back data should be 9 for the intervention arm and 22 for the TAU arm. This article has been corrected.1

Reference

  • 1.Latimer EA, Rabouin D, Cao Z, et al. ; At Home/Chez Soi Investigators. Cost-effectiveness of Housing First intervention with Intensive Case Management compared with treatment as usual for homeless adults with mental illness: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES