Abstract
Generally, sub-Saharan countries possess abundant energy resources including renewables and fossil sources, with natural gas potentially being among the more abundant resource second only to solar power. For conventional electrical energy generation, gas turbines are one of the most prominent technologies being adopted in producing electricity from natural gas. Nigeria, for instance has the largest natural gas reserves in Africa, and the 9th largest in the World. Thus, more than 80% of her electricity generation utilizes gas turbines. To effectively monitor the state of these gas turbines, several sensors are located on the turbines to acquire data in real time. In this data article, we present the acquired data from a 5.68-MW gas turbine installed as an independent power producing unit in a community in Ogun State, Nigeria over a period of six months. Performing various descriptive analysis on the dataset, the real power measurements were taken as the target parameters, and based on a threshold correlation co-efficient of 0.5, only sixteen (16) parameters were shown to be more closely positively correlated with the real power measurements. Thus, any variation in the real power supplied by the gas turbine would have a commensurate effect on any of the other 16 parameters identified, and could thus help in troubleshooting or scheduling maintenance.
Keywords: Gas turbines, Electrical energy, Energy efficiency, Data analytics
Specifications Table
| Subject | Energy |
| Specific subject area | Energy Engineering and Power Technology |
| Type of data | Table Chart Figure |
| How data were acquired | Turbomach Turbotronic 4 Control System. Made by Solar Turbines Incorporated. |
| Data format | Raw Analyzed Filtered |
| Parameters for data collection | Over a period of 24 hours, recorded from H1 to H24, all fifty (50) features/parameters of the gas turbine were recorded only when the turbine was operational. No reading was obtained when the turbine was shut-down due to maintenance. |
| Description of data collection | The Turbomach Turbotronic 4 monitors remotely the readings of all sensors on the gas turbine. It compiles all records in a comma separated file format (CSV) and categorizes them by Day and Night. Due approval was obtained prior to the usage of this data. |
| Data source location | Ota, Ogun State Nigeria 6.6778° N, 3.1654° E |
| Data accessibility | Mendeley Data, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17632/6w3vy3ybhg.3 Direct URL to data: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/6w3vy3ybhg/3 |
Value of the Data
|
1. Data
Descriptive findings from the correlation matrix of the entire dataset [1] reveal nineteen features of the total fifty features which portray significant positive correlation metrics with the real power produced by the gas turbine. The real power produced by the gas turbine is taken as the target feature or parameter in this data investigation. Prior studies on the effects of ambient temperature on gas powered plants were performed by Refs. [2], [3]. Results obtained indicates significant reductions in turbine's efficiency and electricity production capacities when ambient temperature increases. Thus, other researchers such as [4], [5], [5], [6] proposed novel cooling strategies for natural gas combined cycle power plants (NGCPP). Although natural gas being used in gas turbines denotes a form of fossil-based energy resource, another way through which these sorts of conventional energy resource are being utilized is in hybrid energy systems in terms of micro/mini grids where the conventional source (in this case gas turbines) combined with other renewable energy resources could be harnessed to consistently supply consumer energy demands [7], [8]. In this dataset, the sample space size for every hour of the six months period (July 1st, 2017 till December 31st, 2017) in which this data was recorded is 4416 [1]. However, due to the data clean-ups conducted on the raw data to remove outliers and eliminate null values (when the turbine was shut-down due to scheduled maintenance or gas constraints), the sample space size became 2946. Hence, each of the 19 related parameters had a total of 2946 observations, and have been divided into five different sets as seen in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5. Each of these 19 related parameters considered for the analysis are briefly explained below:
-
1)
Compressor T5 average: Air Compressor Average Temperature
-
2)
Compressor inlet air temperature (T1): Temperature of the air entering the compressor
-
3)
Lube oil temperature: Temperature of the Turbine lubricating oil.
-
4)
Ceiling temperature: Temperature of the turbine compartment ceiling.
-
5)
Turbine vibration 2X: Turbine vibration of the X-axis
-
6)
Turbine temperature T5 #1: Thermocouple 1- Exhaust Temperature
-
7)
Turbine temperature T5 #2: Thermocouple 2-Exhaust Temperature
-
8)
Turbine temperature T5 #3: Thermocouple 3- Exhaust Temperature
-
9)
Turbine temperature T5 #4: Thermocouple 4- Exhaust Temperature
-
10)
Turbine temperature T5 #5: Thermocouple 5- Exhaust Temperature
-
11)
Turbine temperature T5 #6: Thermocouple 6- Exhaust Temperature
-
12)
Turbine exhaust temperature T7 (Average): Average Exhaust Temperature
-
13)
Gas fuel flow: Flow rate of the gas consumption
-
14)
Generator L1 winding temperature: Temperature of the phase A winding
-
15)
Generator L2 winding temperature: Temperature of the phase B winding
-
16)
Generator L3 winding temperature: Temperature of the phase C winding
-
17)
Current A: Load Current on Phase A
-
18)
Current B: Load Current on Phase B
-
19)
Current C: Load Current on Phase C
Table 1.
First set of related parameters.
| Features | Mean | SD | Median | MAD | Min | Max | Skew | Kurtosis | SE | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current A | 128.0783 | 50.45164 | 124 | 45.9606 | 0 | 284 | 0.157364 | −0.2871033 | 0.9295205 | 63 |
| Current B | 125.9355 | 50.57952 | 121 | 45.9606 | 0 | 288 | 0.2090694 | −0.2641368 | 0.9318764 | 63 |
| Current C | 127.6718 | 51.44078 | 122 | 47.4432 | 0 | 281 | 0.2248668 | −0.3214426 | 0.9477442 | 64 |
| Gas fuel flow | 696.1174 | 259.7163 | 717 | 155.673 | 0 | 1258 | −1.248423 | 1.9464801 | 4.7850098 | 212 |
Table 2.
Second set of related parameters.
| Features | Mean | SD | Median | MAD | Min | Max | Skew | Kurtosis | SE | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbine temperature T5 #1 | 420.9838 | 91.99611 | 420 | 72.6474 | 2.9 | 644 | −0.5440941 | 1.211722 | 1.694935 | 98 |
| Turbine temperature T5 #2 | 438.3489 | 79.62829 | 426 | 69.6822 | 24 | 893 | 0.5374985 | 0.7281078 | 1.467071 | 98.75 |
| Turbine temperature T5 #3 | 439.8568 | 67.41285 | 432 | 62.2692 | 5.9 | 682 | −0.0500536 | 1.4635095 | 1.242013 | 86 |
| Turbine temperature T5 #4 | 436.4335 | 86.69454 | 423 | 80.0604 | 24 | 840 | 0.5172683 | 0.0776127 | 1.597259 | 110 |
Table 3.
Third set of related parameters.
| Features | Mean | SD | Median | MAD | Min | Max | Skew | Kurtosis | SE | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbine temperature T5 #5 | 418.8993 | 83.106816 | 407 | 74.13 | 0.35 | 872 | 0.2118989 | 0.6158988 | 1.5311589 | 107.75 |
| Turbine temperature T5 #6 | 417.9124 | 76.906636 | 406 | 69.6822 | 24 | 646 | 0.4615251 | 0.0591773 | 1.4169269 | 97 |
| Turbine Exhaust temperature T7 (Average) | 350.9756 | 56.906193 | 339 | 45.9606 | 3.2 | 875 | 0.9048409 | 4.6714972 | 1.048439 | 67 |
| Turbine vibration 2 X | 17.1721 | 2.718093 | 17 | 2.9652 | 8 | 33 | 0.0096114 | 0.4602953 | 0.0500781 | 4 |
Table 4.
Fourth set of related parameters.
| Features | Mean | SD | Median | MAD | Min | Max | Skew | Kurtosis | SE | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceiling temperature | 43.96592 | 3.970685 | 43 | 2.9652 | 4.7 | 80 | 0.1536982 | 10.319183 | 0.0731559 | 5 |
| Lube oil temperature | 72.46368 | 4.159743 | 72 | 1.4826 | 4 | 98 | −5.5524509 | 100.0401 | 0.0766391 | 3 |
| Compressor inlet air temp. (T1) | 982.08687 | 435.98801 | 1169 | 88.956 | 0.25 | 1669 | −1.6895842 | 0.9674669 | 8.0326377 | 134 |
| Compressor T5 average | 431.52507 | 79.294473 | 419.5 | 70.4235 | 0.98 | 1215 | 0.5272685 | 3.838034 | 1.4609204 | 98.75 |
Table 5.
Fifth set of related parameters.
| Features | Mean | SD | Median | MAD | Min | Max | Skew | Kurtosis | SE | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generator L1 winding temperature | 57.71154 | 7.963957 | 56 | 5.9304 | 3.2 | 84 | 0.3360594 | 2.7138029 | 0.1467278 | 9 |
| Generator L2 winding temperature | 58.48167 | 7.747578 | 57 | 5.9304 | 24 | 85 | 0.7741502 | 0.5158233 | 0.1427413 | 10 |
| Generator L3 winding temperature | 58.58239 | 7.765308 | 57 | 5.9304 | 6.13 | 84 | 0.3145802 | 2.8790363 | 0.1430679 | 9 |
Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 present the descriptive statistics of the first four sets of related parameters for the real power produced by the gas turbine, where each set had four independent features respectively. Table 5, however, presented similar descriptive statistics but had only three features. The descriptive statistics considered were the mean, median, median absolute deviation (MAD), skewness, kurtosis, standard error (SE), Interquartile range (IQR), and standard deviation (SD).
Fig. 1, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, Fig. 15, Fig. 18show the graphical correlation matrix of the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth related parameters respectively. A threshold correlation co-efficient of 0.5 was selected in this data investigation. Hence, from the graphical correlation matrix obtained, only correlation co-efficient above 0.5 was selected as having strong correlation with the real power produced. Thus, from Fig. 1, since the correlation co-efficients of all features were greater than 0.5, a boxplot of each feature against the time duration of operation of the gas turbine (H1 to H24) was graphed as shown in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5. In Fig. 6, all four features also had correlation co-efficients greater than 0.5, hence, Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10 show the boxplot of each of these features against the hour time variable (H1 to H24). Considering the third set of related parameters, from Fig. 11, only three out of the four features considered had correlation co-efficients greater than the threshold value. Hence, Fig. 12, Fig. 13, Fig. 14 show a boxplot of the features against the 24-h time duration of the gas turbine. In the fourth set of related parameters, out of all four features as shown in Fig. 15, only the compressor T5 average parameter and that of the ceiling temperature had a correlation co-efficient greater than 0.5. Hence, Fig. 16, Fig. 17 reveal the boxplots of these parameters against the 24-h time duration of the gas turbine's operation. Lastly, Fig. 18 shows the graphical correlation matrix of the fifth set of related parameters. All three features considered had correlation co-efficients above the threshold value of 0.5. Hence, Fig. 19, Fig. 20, Fig. 21 depict the boxplots of these features against the hour time variable (H1 to H24). As these data was provided by an Independent Gas Turbine Power Plant in Ogun State, the dataset is more representative of most South-Western States in Nigeria due to the relatively similar atmospheric climatic conditions at these locations. It may also prove representative of some regions in sub-Saharan countries like Benin Republic and Togo which possess similar climatic conditions as those experienced in south-western states of Nigeria.
Fig. 1.
Correlation matrix of first set of related parameters with real power as target.
Fig. 6.
Correlation matrix of second set of related parameters with real power as target.
Fig. 11.
Correlation matrix of third set of related parameters with real power as target.
Fig. 15.
Correlation matrix of fourth set of related parameters with real power as target.
Fig. 18.
Correlation matrix of fifth set of related parameters with real power as target.
Fig. 2.
Current in line A by hour time.
Fig. 3.
Current in line B by hour time.
Fig. 4.
Current in line C by hour time.
Fig. 5.
Gas fuel flow by hour time.
Fig. 7.
Turbine temperature T5 #1 by hour time.
Fig. 8.
Turbine temperature T5 #2 by hour time.
Fig. 9.
Turbine temperature T5 #3 by hour time.
Fig. 10.
Turbine temperature T5 #4 by hour time.
Fig. 12.
Turbine temperature T5 #5 by hour time.
Fig. 13.
Turbine temperature T5 #6 by hour time.
Fig. 14.
Turbine Exhaust temperature T7 (Average) by hour time.
Fig. 16.
Ceiling temperature by hour time.
Fig. 17.
Compressor T5 average by hour time.
Fig. 19.
Generator L1 winding temperature by hour time.
Fig. 20.
Generator L2 winding temperature by hour time.
Fig. 21.
Generator L3 winding temperature by hour time.
2. Experimental design, materials, and methods
The relationships existing between other system parameters/features and the real power measured from the 5.68-MW gas turbine was ascertained using the R statistical programming software (version 3.5.3). A total of 50 features were recorded by the Turbomach Turbotronic 4 SCADA application running on a core i5 2.40 GHz workstation with 1TB of hard-disk space and 4GB RAM. The Turbomach Turbotronic 4 application monitored the gas turbine in real time over a 24-h time period (H1 to H24) and at times when the turbine was shut down due to gas constraints or scheduled maintenance, no values were recorded for the total 50 parameters monitored. The data was recorded by various temperature and pressure sensors installed at various points on the turbine during operation. The data recorded by each sensor changed with every change in load demand and ambient temperature. A transmitter transfers the measured data to a remote Human-Machine Interface (HMI) in the control room via an ethernet cable and the displayed data is collated hourly from the HMI. The complete R markdown code utilized in running the descriptive analysis on the raw turbine dataset is shown in Ref. [9]. Among the library packages used in this code are ‘ggplot2’ which was used for all the plots in this data article. The ‘psych’ library provided the descriptive statistics for each set of related parameters considered. In filtering the dataset to remove all ‘not available (na)’ values and all non-significant features, the ‘dplyr’ library was utilized. The ‘readxl’ library read in the excel spreadsheet, and the ‘writexl’ library were used to write data-frames into excel spreadsheets. From the descriptive analysis performed on the raw dataset obtained, a total of nineteen (19) features were deduced. Of all 19 related parameters considered, only 16 parameters had a correlation co-efficient greater than 0.5 with respect to the target variable (real power).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Centre for Research, Innovation and Discovery (CUCRID) of Landmark and Covenant University.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.Ayodele Benjamin Esan, Vincent Ehiaguina. Data-set for independent gas turbine for electricity generation. Mendeley Data. 2019 doi: 10.17632/6w3vy3ybhg.3. v3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sen Gunnur, Nil Mustafa, Mamur Hayati, Dogan Halit, Karamolla Mustafa, Karacor Mevlut, Kuyucuoglu Fadil, Yorukeren Nuran, Ruhul Mohammad, Amin Bhuiyan. The effect of ambient temperature on electric power generation in natural gas combined cycle power plant—a case study. Energy Rep. 2018;4:682–690. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gonzalez-Diaz Abigail, Alcaraz-Calderon Agustin M., Gonzalez-Diaz Maria Ortencia, Mendez-Aranda Angel, Lucquiaud Mathieu, Gonzalez-Santalo Jose Miguel. Effect of the ambient conditions on gas turbine combined cycle power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture. Energy. 2017;134:221–233. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu Zuming, Karimi Iftekhar A., He Tianbiao. A novel inlet air cooling system based on liquefied natural gas cold energy utilization for improving power plant performance. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019;187:41–52. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farzaneh-Gord Mahmood, Deymi-Dashtebayaz Mahdi. Effect of various inlet air cooling methods on gas turbine performance. Energy. 2011;36:1196–1205. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kwon Hyun Min, Kim Tong Seop, Sohn Jeong Lak, Kang Do Won. Performance improvement of gas turbine combined cycle power plant by dual cooling of the inlet air and turbine coolant using an absorption chiller. Energy. 2018;163:1050–1061. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ayodele Esan, Misra Sanjay, Damasevicius Robertas, Maskeliunas Rytis. Hybrid microgrid for microfinance institutions in rural areas – a field demonstration in west Africa. Sustainable energy technology and assessments. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2019;35:89–97. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ayodele Benjamin Esan, Ayoade Felix Agbetuyi, Oghorada Oghenevogaga, Ogbeide Kingsley, Awelewa Ayokunle A., Esan Afolabi A. Reliability assessments of an islanded hybrid PV-diesel-battery system for a typical rural community in Nigeria. Heliyon. 2019;5 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ayodele Benjamin Esan. Code for data-set investigation of a gas turbine for electricity generation. Mendeley Data. 2019 doi: 10.17632/br38t938c2.3. v3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]





















