Abstract
A non-planned pregnancy in a patient with type 1 diabetes with ocular complications, was treated with degludec from pre-conception stages until the postpartum is reported. The newborn was healthy without any congenital abnormalities; however, due to respiratory distress required neonatal intensive care unit.
Keywords: pregnancy, insulin, degludec, glargine, detemir
Introduction
Pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes might be a hazardous state, due to the difficulties concerning adequate metabolic control, which result in adverse outcomes for the mother and the fetus [1]. Known complications of diabetes during pregnancy have been described, including increased risk for hypoglycemia, preeclampsia, fetal macrosomia, and respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn, among other prenatal and perinatal complications [2]. The rationale for adequate glycemic control is clear; nevertheless, some patients have difficulties keeping up with glucose goals while on treatment with intermediate-acting neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin or the long-acting insulin analogs such as detemir, which are approved for use during pregnancy. Although insulin degludec is not approved for use in pregnant women, this extra-long-acting insulin analog could be a potential alternative for those women with complicated glycemic control during pregnancy. However, the safety of insulin degludec during pregnancy is unknown and the reported data are limited to case reports. We report an unplanned pregnancy in a patient with type 1 diabetes with complications treated with degludec from preconception stages until postpartum.
Case presentation
A 33-year-old patient with type 1 diabetes associated with high-risk proliferative retinopathy and A2 albuminuria (diagnosed at the age of 16) switched to insulin degludec two years prior to her last pregnancy. The patient was treated with insulin degludec (27 units) and fixed-dose insulin glulisine (10 units) with each meal. The patient became pregnant despite medical advice, the HbA1c during the first trimester was 6.1% (43 mmol/mol) without reported hypoglycemia. The medical team ordered her to change from degludec to insulin detemir; however, the patient was reluctant considering that insulin degludec provided better metabolic control compared to previous insulin regimens. Despite several explanations of the unknown risk of insulin degludec during pregnancy, the patient decided to continue the pregnancy with this insulin. The first trimester went through without complications, as well as the second trimester. The total insulin dose at the end of the third trimester was 30 IU of degludec daily and 18 IU of glulisine before each meal. Ultrasound at 34 weeks of pregnancy showed an anterior placenta, and the fetus presented in podalic version. The fetus’ weight was 2281 g (40th percentile). During week 35, the patient developed preeclampsia and underwent an emergency C-section. The child was born with a bodyweight of 2500 g (50th percentile), 43 cm in length (percentile 10-50th), had a low Apgar score at 1 min and 5 min (5/10 points), and required non-invasive ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit for two days but did not present with any congenital defects. Currently, the baby is 10 months old and healthy.
Discussion
Insulin degludec is not approved during pregnancy, and safety is currently unknown. The use of new insulin analogs may be associated with potential maternal or fetal complications due to their strength or to its potential binding to the IGF-1 receptor [3]. For example, insulin glargine is not currently approved during pregnancy, and only detemir may be used due to the known safety profile during pregnancy [4]. On the other hand, hypoglycemia and poor diabetes control are associated with pregnancy complications and worse neonatal outcomes as well as fetal deformities. The better pharmacokinetic control and the low hypoglycemic rates of insulin degludec compared with other insulins suggest that degludec could be a potential and safe insulin during pregnancy [5]. Degludec use during pregnancy is being investigated in the EXPECT trial (Clinical Trials NCT03377699). In this clinical trial, degludec will be compared to insulin detemir with a primary outcome of last planned HbA1c prior to delivery. Secondary outcomes will evaluate maternal and neonatal safety issues, including preeclampsia, worsening of retinopathy, and hypoglycemia rates. This study began in November 2017, and the expected date of completion will be in 2021. Until the data of the EXPECT trial are available, the only source of clinical evidence of degludec use and safety during pregnancy will be case reports and retrospective studies. To our knowledge, there are only seven published cases including our case using degludec during pregnancy (Table 1) [6-8]
Table 1. Table 1. Reported cases of insulin degludec use during pregnancy.
Case 1 [7] | Case 2 [7] | Case 3 [7] | Case 4 [6] | Case 5 [6] | Case 6 [8] | Case 7 | |
Mothers | |||||||
Age, years | 37 | 26 | 22 | 34 | 22 | 31 | 33 |
Type of diabetes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Diabetes duration, years | 10 | 19 | 13 | 8 | 16 | 3 | 17 |
Pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m2 | 21.5 | 25 | 21.6 | 22.7 | 36.1 | 33.9 | 27 |
HbA1c (mmol/mol) | |||||||
Pre-conception | 8.5 (69) | 9.4 (79) | 9.2 (77) | 6.3 (45) | 7.7 (61) | 6.6 (49) | 8.9 (74) |
First trimester | 7.2 (55) | 7.4 (57) | 9.9 (85) | 6.0 (42) | 6.6 (49) | 6.6 (49) | 6.1 (43) |
Second trimester | 6.8 (51) | 7.3 (56) | 7.6 (60) | 5.8 (40) | 5.7 (39) | 5.6 (38) | 7.1 (54) |
Third trimester | 6.7 (50) | 6.3 (45) | 8.2 (66) | 5.2 (33) | 5.0 (31) | 6.1 (43) | Not done |
Micro-/macrovascular complications | |||||||
Before pregnancy | NPDR | No | No | No | No | No | PDR |
During pregnancy | No | No | No | No | No | No | Pre-eclampsia |
Degludec treatment during pregnancy, in weeks | 29 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 8 | 38 | 34 |
Weight gain at the end of pregnancy, kg | 6 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 14 |
Time of delivery, weeks | 29 | 35 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 38 | 34 |
Delivery | Caesarean | Caesarean | Caesarean | Caesarean | Induced | Caesarean | Caesarean |
Newborn | |||||||
Birth weight, g | 1730 | 2900 | 3930 | 3330 | 3300 | 3280 | 2500 |
Length, cm | 41 | -- | 50 | 54.5 | 50 | 49 | 43 |
Congenital malformations | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
APGAR score at 1 and 5 min | 7/10, 8/10 | 10/10, 10/10 | 9/10, 10/10 | 8/10, 9/10 | 9/10, 10/10 | 8/10, 9/10 | 6/10, 8/10 |
Neonatal hypoglycemia | No | No | No | Yes, mild | Yes, moderate | No | No |
NICU admission | Yes (bilirubin increase and episodes of apnea) | No | No | Yes (respiratory distress) | Yes (bilirubin increase) | No | Yes (respiratory distress) |
Almost all cases involved type 1 diabetes with variable glycemic control before pregnancy [6-8]. Interestingly, most cases had a delivery with a cesarean section. There were no reported cases of congenital abnormalities. However, 2 newborns had hypoglycemia and more than 50% of the population of newborns required neonatal ICU. These findings may be related to mother diabetic status and related complications.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we present the case of a type 1 diabetic patient who was treated during pregnancy with insulin degludec. The use of insulin degludec is not currently approved during pregnancy. Evidence of its safety during pregnancy is limited to case reports, and clearly, the safety and use of this insulin during pregnancy need to be clarified in a randomized clinical trial and in large cohort studies.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.
Alejandro Roman-Gonzalez declare(s) personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis, Shire, Amgen and Boehringer Ingelheim.. Carlos Alfonso Builes-Barrera declare(s) personal fees from Merck, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Laboratorio Investigación Hormonal, Merck, Abbott and Dinámica IPS.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Comité de Ética de la investigación issued approval ACTA 33-2018. Buenos días, Doctores Alejandro Roman Carlos Alfonso Builes Alejandra Aristizabal. El Comité de Ética de la investigación evaluó y aprobó el reporte de caso "Exposure to degludec during pregnancy. A case report" En el archivo adjunto encontrará los oficios correspondientes
References
- 1.Management of diabetes in pregnancy. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:137–143. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. Duckitt K, Harrington D. BMJ. 2005;330:565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Insulin analogues in pregnancy and specific congenital anomalies: a literature review. de Jong J, Garne E, Wender-Ozegowska E, Morgan M, de Jong-van den Berg LT, Wang H. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:366–375. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Mathiesen ER, Hod M, Ivanisevic M, et al. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:2012–2017. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifteen clinical trials. Liu W, Yang X, Huang J. Int J Endocrinol. 2018;2018:8726046. doi: 10.1155/2018/8726046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Insulin degludec in the first trimester of pregnancy: report of two cases. Milluzzo A, Tumminia A, Scalisi NM, Frittitta L, Vigneri R, Sciacca L. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:629–631. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Exposure to insulin degludec during pregnancy: report of a small series and review of the literature. Bonora BM, Avogaro A, Fadini GP. J Endocrinol Invest. 2019;42:345–349. doi: 10.1007/s40618-018-0926-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Empagliflozin, metformin and insulin degludec, during pregnancy: a case report. Formoso G, Ginestra F, Di Dalmazi G, Consoli A. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55:759–761. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1134-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]