Abstract
Kabuki Syndrome patients have a spectrum of congenital disorders, including congenital heart defects, the primary determinant of mortality. Seventy percent of Kabuki Syndrome patients have mutations in the histone methyl-transferase KMT2D. However, the underlying mechanisms that drive these congenital disorders are unknown. Here, we generated and characterized zebrafish kmt2d null mutants that recapitulate the cardinal phenotypic features of Kabuki Syndrome, including microcephaly, palate defects, abnormal ear development, and cardiac defects. The cardiac phenotype consists of a previously unknown vasculogenesis defect that affects endocardium patterning and, consequently, heart ventricle lumen formation. Additionally, zebrafish kmt2d null mutants have angiogenesis defects depicted by abnormal aortic arch development, hyperactive ectopic blood vessel sprouting, and aberrant patterning of the brain vascular plexus. We demonstrate that zebrafish kmt2d null mutants have robust Notch signaling hyperactivation in endocardial and endothelial cells, including increased protein levels of the Notch transcription factor Rbpj. Our zebrafish Kabuki Syndrome model reveals a regulatory link between the Notch pathway and Kmt2d during endothelium and endocardium patterning and shows that pharmacological inhibition of Notch signaling rebalances Rbpj protein levels and rescues the cardiovascular phenotype by enhancing endothelial and endocardial cell proliferation and stabilizing endocardial patterning. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Kmt2d regulates vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, provide evidence for interactions between Kmt2d and Notch signaling in Kabuki Syndrome, and suggest future directions for clinical research.
Kabuki Syndrome (KS) is a human congenital disorder with mutations in KMT2D. Zebrafish kmt2d mutants recapitulate human KS phenotypes, have aberrant Notch pathway signaling, and implicate vasculogenesis as a driver of abnormal cardiac development. Pharmacological inhibition of the Notch pathway rescues vasculogenesis in KS zebrafish, with potential therapeutic implications.
Introduction
Kabuki Syndrome type I (KS, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM] number 147920) is a rare multisystemic disorder, manifested by craniofacial anomalies, including cleft lip and/or cleft palate and microcephaly, hearing loss, neurodevelopmental defects, epilepsy, skeletal and skin abnormalities, and congenital heart defects (CHDs) [1,2,11,3–10]. Although there is variable expressivity of the clinical hallmarks [8,12], CHD is present in approximately 70% of KS patients, with a unique predilection for left-sided obstructive lesions, including hypoplastic aortic arch, coarctation of the aorta, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome [13–17]. De novo pathogenic variants in Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D) are causative in up to 76% of KS patients [18,19]. KMT2D, also known as MLL4 and MLL2 in humans and Mll2 in mice, belongs to a family of histone 3 lysine 4 methyltransferases [20], encodes a large protein with multiple domains, and plays critical roles regulating gene expression through epigenetics mechanisms. Despite great progress in genetic diagnosis for KS, our understanding of KS phenotypic variability and the downstream molecular pathways underlying the abnormal development of specific organ systems in KS is limited. Thus, characterizing the molecular mechanisms that drive phenotypic variation of KMT2D-dependent diseases is crucial for designing therapies to ameliorate these disorders.
Germline knockout of Kmt2d in mice is embryonic lethal, limiting the ability to model and study KS [21]. Conditional Kmt2d knockout in murine cardiac precursors and cardiomyocytes indicated that KMT2D is essential for regulating cardiac gene expression during heart development, primarily via di-methylation marks in lysine 4 of histone 3 (H3K4) [22]. The observation that cardiac progenitor-specific Kmt2d deletion mutants manifest more severe forms of CHD compared with myocardium-specific Kmt2d deletion suggests an unexplored critical role for Kmt2d other cardiovascular lineages, in particular in endocardium or endothelial lineages. Understanding the contribution of KMT2D to endocardial and endothelial development is crucial given that the prognosis of KS patients depends on the diagnosis and management of left-sided obstructive cardiovascular lesions [23].
Morpholino knockdown of kmt2d in zebrafish revealed craniofacial abnormalities, gross neurological defects, and anomalies in cardiac looping, suggesting that zebrafish might serve as a model for KS [24]. However, these phenotypes are common in morpholino treatments [25–27]. A recent study revealed a link between retrovirus-associated DNA sequence/Mitogen-activated protein kinase (RAS/MAPK) pathway hyperactivation and the neurological and craniofacial defects in the context of KS using rap1a and rap1b mutants and rap1a, rap1b, raf1, kmt2d, and kmd6a morpholino knockdowns in zebrafish [28]. In line with this, chemical inhibition of a downstream target of this pathway (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 [BRAF] inhibitor), partially rescued the craniofacial and neuroanatomical phenotype of kmt2d-depleted zebrafish larvae in transient knockdown and kmt2d+/− heterozygous crosses [29]. These findings suggest a pathway involved in some aspects of KS neurological defects and establishes the utility of zebrafish for drugs screening in KS. However, modeling cardiovascular developmental defects in KS and their molecular pathways, and possible approaches to reduce cardiovascular defects—the major cause of death in KS—have not been explored.
Although the molecular signatures driving KS phenotype have been reported [21,24,30], it remains unclear how KMT2D impacts cardiovascular patterning. Here, we generated zebrafish germline genetic mutants for kmt2d and validated them as models for KS by analyzing multiple cardinal clinical manifestations of this syndrome, including variable expressivity, short body length, palate defects, abnormal ear development, and heart defects. We identify for the first time a critical role for Kmt2d in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis and demonstrate a regulatory link between Kmt2d and Notch signaling. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of Notch signaling rescues the cardiovascular defects observed in kmt2d mutant zebrafish, providing a platform for small molecule therapies to ameliorate the cardiovascular defects observed in KS patients.
Results
Zebrafish kmt2d null mutants exhibit phenotypes observed in human Kabuki Syndrome patients
Zebrafish kmt2d (ENSDARG00000037060) on Chromosome 23 contains 53 exons, with a 17.6 kb mRNA encoding a 362.7 KDa protein. Although the zebrafish Kmt2d protein (UniProt E7F2F7) only has 44.3% amino acid identity with the human KMT2D (UniProt O14686), BLAST analysis of the individual protein domains showed that the Plant Homeo Domain (PHD) located at the N terminus of the zebrafish Kmt2d has 86.1% identity with the human PHD (UniProt O14686: aa 5030 to 5137 and 126 to 217) and the Su-Enhancer-of-zeste and Trithorax (SET) and Post-SET domains located at the C terminus of the zebrafish protein have 99.1% and 100% identity with the human SET (O14686: aa 5398 to 5513) and Post-Set domains (O14686: aa 5521 to 5537), respectively. Important for functional analysis using reverse genetic approaches, this is the only ortholog for the human Kmt2d gene found in zebrafish, and there are no known paralogues.
To evaluate Kmt2d functional roles in zebrafish, we used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate zebrafish kmt2d null mutants. Exon 8 (ENSDARE00001117370), which contains the coding sequence for a PHD domain of the Kmt2d protein (Fig 1A), was targeted with a single guide RNA (sgRNA). On-target mutagenesis of injected embryos (F0) was confirmed by High Resolution Melt Analysis (HRMA) of the predicted target region for the sgRNA. Germline transmission of mutant alleles was confirmed by F1 genotyping. Genotyping of individual F1 adults revealed multiple kmt2d alleles, 3 of which were selected for propagation and additional analysis: kmt2dzy58 (Fig 1B [panels b, e, h; 1bp deletion]), kmt2dzy59 (Fig 1B [panels a, d, g; 19 bp deletion]), and kmt2dzy60 (Fig 1B [panels c, f, I; 2 bp deletion]). These mutant alleles are predicted to result in a premature stop codon leading to truncation in one of the PHD domain located at the N terminus of the protein. Loss of full-length Kmt2d protein was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (S1A Fig and S1B Fig).
In order to assess the phenotypes of kmt2d mutations and to determine whether any identified phenotypic traits followed expected mendelian ratios, we performed 3 different heterozygous by heterozygous crosses for each of 3 mutant alleles and screened for phenotypes, with an emphasis on organs and systems that are affected in KS patients. Interestingly, embryonic development was grossly normal until 2 days post fertilization (dpf). Starting at 3 dpf, embryos showed signs of cardiac edema (Fig 1B, arrow), microcephaly (Fig 1B, arrowhead), and body axis defects (Fig 1B [panels g, h, i])—attributes similar to KS clinical manifestations. Whole body edema was evident at 3 to 4 dpf (S2A Fig, S2B Fig, S2C Fig), and these phenotypes continued to develop until approximately 7 dpf.
To assess whether these phenotypes segregated with the mutant alleles, we selected 16 embryos with wild-type phenotypes and 32 embryos with KS phenotypes at 3 dpf and processed them individually for DNA extraction and HRMA analysis. All embryos with KS phenotypes were homozygous for the kmt2d mutant alleles, whereas embryos that appeared phenotypically normal were homozygous wild type or heterozygous at the kmt2d locus. Moreover, the percentage of embryos from a het by het cross with an abnormal phenotype was approximately 25% in 3 different clutches for each of the 3 alleles assayed (Fig 1C). These results were verified by performing Chi-square and binomial distribution tests against an expected mendelian ratio of 75% wild-type and heterozygous embryos (no phenotype) and 25% mutant embryos (with phenotype; Fig 1C).
Humans with KS have wide variation in phenotypes [7,31]. Similarly, zebrafish kmt2d mutants had a range of variable expressivity of phenotypic traits. To assess whether the observed variable expressivity occurred for different parental crosses and mutant alleles, we defined 3 phenotypic categories as follow: class I, WT phenotype corresponding to homozygous wild-type and heterozygous siblings (Fig 1B [panels a, b, c]); class II, homozygous mutant embryos exhibiting heart edema and microcephaly (Fig 1B [panels d, e, f]); class III, homozygous mutant embryos exhibiting heart edema, microcephaly, and shorter body axis (Fig 1B [panels g, h, i]). Embryos from 3 different parental crosses for each of 3 mutant alleles were screened for each category. Our results showed that variable expressivity of the phenotypic traits is a consistent characteristic in zebrafish kmt2d homozygous mutants (Fig 1C).
Our protein expression data showed that Kmt2d was strongly and ubiquitously expressed during development (S1C Fig, S1D Fig, S1E Fig, and S1F Fig), consistent with phenotypes in multiple organ systems. In order to discover pathway perturbations that lead to KS phenotypes, we pursued the kmt2d-dependent alterations in transcriptional profiles that immediately precede the onset of the KS phenotypes, reasoning that transcriptome changes that are proximal to the earliest onset of phenotypes would be most informative and not confounded by downstream secondary effects of transcriptomes. RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was performed on single 1 dpf embryos, prior to the appearance of a KS phenotype. The transcriptome was analyzed in 6 individual homozygous kmt2dzy59 mutants and 6 individual homozygous wild-type siblings (total n = 12). For gene differential expression analysis, we performed DESeq2 using Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) [32] at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5%. Our results showed that, at 1 dpf, 276 genes were differentially expressed in kmt2dzy59 mutants when compared with their wild-type siblings (Fig 1D, MA plot pink and colored dots). Text-mining analysis (further described in Methods) revealed that 72.1% of the top 50 genes are associated with neural and/or cardiovascular system, whereas the remaining genes have been associated with reproductive system, muscle, and pharyngeal arches development (Fig 1D, MA plot color-coded dots; S1 Table). Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed a small group of gene sets that were enriched in kmt2dzy59 mutants (S2 Table). Interestingly, all the gene sets with a 5% FDR were exclusively associated with structural extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoproteins (Fig 1E; S2 Table), suggesting essential changes in ECM composition or topography even before phenotype manifestation. In addition, a specific Notch downstream target gene, her4.4, appeared to be up-regulated in kmt2d mutants (Log2 fold change = 044, p = 0.039), consistent with our subsequent analysis of Notch signaling.
Our gross examination of kmt2d mutants at 3 dpf and transcriptome analysis supports the hypothesis of a relatively small group of Kmt2d-dependent genes affected early in development that could explain the molecular etiology of kmt2dzy59 phenotype observed at later stages. Together, these data introduce a zebrafish kmt2d null mutant model and demonstrate its phenotypic and molecular utility as a model for studying Kabuki Syndrome.
kmt2dzy59 mutants exhibit anomalous palate development and middle ear structural defects
Our morphological and transcriptome analyses suggested that abnormal pharyngeal arch development might contribute to the spectrum of cranial defects observed in kmt2dzy59 embryos (Fig 1B and 1D). Additionally, palate and middle ear structures are derived from pharyngeal arches and are affected in KS patients, serving as diagnostic features for the syndrome [2,4–6]. Zebrafish anterior neurocranium and lower jaw structures are well established models for mammal palate and middle ear development, respectively [33]. To assess whether Kmt2d loss affects pharyngeal arch development, we analyzed craniofacial skeleton phenotypes by Alcian Blue/Red Alizarin staining in kmt2dzy59 mutants and wild-type siblings. Craniofacial cartilage architecture was strongly affected in kmt2dzy59 mutants (Fig 2) and in kmt2dzy58 and kmt2dzy60 mutants (S2D Fig, S2E Fig, S2F Fig).
The neurocranium (Fig 2B and 2D; light blue) was underdeveloped, and the ethmoid plate (henceforth palate) failed to grow distally (Fig 2A and 2C, arrow). For wild-type siblings, the average length/width ratio of the palate was 1.03 (Fig 2E; n = 10), whereas kmt2dzy59 mutants exhibited a significantly shorter and wider configuration with an average length/width ratio of 0.85 (Fig 2E; n = 10). These results demonstrate that Kmt2d is essential for normal palate development in zebrafish embryos. Comparably, visceral cartilages were significantly affected in kmt2dzy59 embryos (Fig 2B and 2D; dark blue). The pharyngeal arch–derived structures that contribute to the support of the delicate gill tissues (Fig 2B–2D; cb1-5) were completely absent in kmt2d mutants. The cartilage that patterns the lower jaw was absent (Fig 2C and 2D; Meckel’s cartilage, asterisk) or drastically reduced (Fig 2C and 2D; palatoquadrate, hyomandibula, ceratohyal). This represents mispatterning of the structures that are homologous to the mammalian middle ear (Fig 2D; marked as me* in orange). To evaluate reproducibility of this phenotype, we categorized embryos based on the degree of development of Meckel’s, palatoquadrate, and hyomandibula cartilages and calculated percentage of individuals in each category in wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 embryos (Fig 2F). Our results showed that 90% of kmt2dzy59 embryos had absent or mispatterned cartilages in the lower jaw. Together, these results demonstrate that Kmt2d is required for normal development of palate and lower jaw in zebrafish, consistent with clinical findings in KS patients.
kmt2dzy59 mutants have hypoplastic hearts and occluded lumens because of aberrant endocardial cell morphology
Congenital heart defects (CHD) is diagnosed in 28% to 80% of Kabuki Syndrome patients [34]. The spectrum of CHD is wide, with prevalence of aortic coarctation, hypoplastic left heart, and other left-sided obstructive defects [14,15,34]. Previous studies of a mouse cardiomyocyte conditional kmt2d deletion demonstrated that Kmt2d is required in cardiac precursors and cardiomyocytes [22]. Additionally, zebrafish kmt2d morphants were reported to have heart looping defects and abnormal development of atrium and/or ventricle [35]. Despite the growing body of evidence that Kmt2d functions during myocardium development, it has not yet been possible in mice to assess the effects of Kmt2d loss in all cardiac tissues in a null mutant context. To investigate the effects of Kmt2d loss during heart development, we first asked whether Kmt2d protein was expressed in both myocardial and endocardial tissues in zebrafish hearts. Whole mount immunofluorescence in wild-type zebrafish embryos revealed that Kmt2d was ubiquitously expressed in the nucleus of both myocardium and endocardium at 2 dpf (Fig 3A and 3B). In our kmt2d mutants, the cardiac edema that appears at 3 dpf could be the result of accumulated defects in heart morphogenesis or secondary effects from other altered embryological processes. To address whether heart edema could be the result of impaired cardiac function, the heart beat was recorded at 1, 2, 3, and 4 dpf in kmt2dzy59 embryos and wild-type siblings. We found statistically significant bradycardia in kmt2dzy59 embryos compared with their wild-type siblings (S3C Fig; ANOVA significant p = 0.000264, F (1,76) = 14.647). Interestingly, the mean difference between wild type and mutants was constant throughout this developmental period (ANOVA, interaction effect p = 0.746), suggesting bradycardia was not due to later-onset secondary effects but is a constitutive phenotype of kmt2dzy59 embryos.
Next, we analyzed myocardium and endocardium patterning using tg(kdrl:GFP) crossed into the kmt2dzy59 line to mark endocardium and endothelium. Cardiac morphology was significantly altered in kmt2dzy59 at 5 dpf, with overall heart size reduced and a hypoplastic ventricle (Fig 3C and 3D). To assess whether the hypoplastic ventricle was due to abnormal myocardium development, we analyzed ventricle cardiomyocyte cell numbers at 3 and 4 dpf in wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 mutants. Additionally, myocardial cell architecture was evaluated with the marker Alcama at 3 dpf. The numbers of ventricle myocardial cells in wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 mutants were equivalent (Fig 3H; t tests per time point, p-values as follow: 3 dpf p = 0.129, effect size = 24.6. 4 dpf p = 0.906, effect size = −2. Bonferroni corrected p-values for 2 t tests p adjusted values, 3 dpf = 0.258 and 4 dpf = 1.000.), suggesting that the hypoplastic ventricle phenotype in zebrafish kmt2dzy59 is not due to a reduction in the myocardial cell population.
At 3 dpf, zebrafish heart ventricle undergoes the tightly regulated process of trabeculation [36,37], whereby myocardial cells extrude and expand into the lumen of the ventricle [38] forming a network of luminal projections consisting of myocardial cells lined by endocardial cells [38,39]. After this process, myocardial cells of the outer ventricle curvature have a characteristic elongated shape [40]. In order to assess whether cardiomyocyte cell shape was affected in kmt2dzy59 mutants, we measured outer curvature ventricle myocardial cell area and sphericity in wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 at 3 dpf as previously described by Auman and colleagues [40]. Our results showed that ventricle myocardial cells morphology was equivalent in wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 mutants at 3 dpf (S3A Fig, t test p = 0.583 not significant [n.s.] t = 0.59 dF = 5 for area; S3D Fig t test, p = 0.946 n.s.t = 0.71, dF = 6 for myocardial cells sphericity). Overall these results suggest that the hypoplastic heart ventricle in kmt2dzy59 is not driven by a reduction in size, shape, or absolute numbers of myocardial cells.
In contrast to what we observed in myocardium, the endocardium of kmt2d mutant hearts displayed strikingly abnormal morphology (Fig 3Cʹ and 3Dʹ), with endocardial cells in the ventricle forming discrete aggregates in which some individual cells show protruding borders resembling mesenchyme-like morphology (Fig 3Dʹ; arrowheads). In kmt2dzy59 embryos, endocardial cells lose their tight interaction with the adjacent myocardium and form concentric layers (Fig 3E and 3F; arrows) that ultimately occlude the lumen of the ventricle (Fig 3E and 3F; asterisk). Thus, endocardium mispatterning led to lumen volume reduction in all analyzed mutant samples (Fig 3G; t test p = 0.0001, t = 7.54, dF = 8). Interestingly, quantification of ventricle endocardial cells in wild-type versus kmt2dzy59 mutants at 3 dpf showed a significant reduction in the number of EC cells in kmt2d mutants (Fig 3I, t tests per time point, p-values as follow: 3 dpf p- = 0.0007, effect size = 29. 4 dpf p = 0.4139, effect size = 14.6. Bonferroni corrected p-values for 2 t tests p adjusted values, 3 dpf = 0.0015 and 4 dpf = 0.8278). However, this reduction in endocardial cell number did not appear to be due to cell death, because anti active caspase3 IF did not find significant differences in the number of apoptotic cells in kmt2d mutant hearts in the ventricle (S3B Fig; arrowhead). Additionally, the observed difference in endocardial cell number at 3 dpf was not sustained at 4 dpf (Fig 3I, 4 dpf, not significant; 4 dpf p = 0.4139, effect size = 14.6. Bonferroni corrected p-values for 2 t tests p adjusted values, 3 dpf = 0.0015 and 4 dpf = 0.8278). This result indicates that the overall endocardium phenotype is due to (a) slower cell division rate and (b) an aberrant endocardial cell behavior that results in abnormal endocardial tissue patterning and occlusion of the ventricle lumen. This is consistent with the absence of higher rates of apoptosis (S3B Fig; arrowhead) and the observation that at 4 dpf the endocardial cell number was recovered. Altogether, these results indicate that Kmt2d is required for endocardium pattering during zebrafish cardiogenesis. Loss of kmt2d reduced overall heart size, resulting in hypoplastic ventricle with occluded cavity. These results suggest a previously unknown role of Kmt2d in endocardial patterning might contribute the cardiac phenotype observed in KS patients.
kmt2dzy59 mutants are defective in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis
Although KS patients frequently manifest abnormalities of the aortic arches, including hypoplastic aortic arch or coarctation, a mechanistic understanding between KMT2D mutations and vascular anomalies is lacking. During early development, common progenitor cells (angioblasts) give rise to the cardiac endocardium and to the primary vascular endothelium through vasculogenesis [41–43]. After the primary vascular plexus is formed, a more complex vascular network is established through angiogenesis (production of vessels from preexisting ones) [44,45]. Considering their common developmental origin and our results demonstrating abnormal endocardium patterning, we assessed whether kmt2dzy59 mutants have normal vascular patterning. To do so, we analyzed general vasculature integrity through o-dianisidine staining [46] in wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 embryos at 6 dpf (S4A Fig, S4B Fig, S4C Fig, S4D Fig) and found vasculature mispatterning reflected by aggregates of red blood cells in the head and aortic arches (S4B Fig and S4D Fig; white arrowheads).
To assess whether the vascular phenotype in kmt2dzy59 mutants is driven by defects in vasculogenesis or angiogenesis, we analyzed vascular architecture in kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) mutants and tg(Kdrl:GFP) wild-type siblings by focusing on vasculogenesis of aortic arches (AAs) and angiogenesis of the cranial vessels network at 3, 4, 5, and 7 dpf. AA patterning, thickness, and development of general vasculature was dramatically altered in kmt2dzy59 mutants (Fig 4A and 4D; S4F Fig and S4H Fig) when compared with their wild-type siblings (Fig 4A and 4C; S4E Fig, S4F Fig and S4G Fig). Additionally, kmt2d mutants exhibited a primitive mouth with underdeveloped vasculature that failed to elongate anteriorly (Fig 4B, arrowhead). AAs were reduced or completely absent in kmt2d mutants. Consequently, all the vessels that branch into the gills were missing (Fig 4B; vessels on both sides of the heart). Three-dimensional volume rendering of confocal imaging confirmed that AA1 was fully formed but in a primitive state, whereas AAs 3, 4, 5, and 6 were atrophic on one side of the left-right symmetry axis and missing on its specular side (Fig 4Aʹ and 4Bʹ and S1 and S2 Videos). This result indicates that while the formation of the vascular plexus of the AAs was initiated, the overall vasculogenesis process is markedly abnormal in kmt2dzy59 mutants.
The vascular plexus of the brain in kmt2dzy59 mutants had all the major vessels present but with aberrant patterning. Defects were particularly evident in the central artery (CtA), anterior cephalic vein (ACeV), hypobranchial artery (HA) and ventral artery (VA; Fig 4C and 4D; orange segments indicate altered patterning). These observations suggest that even when blood vessels sprout and form, they fail to establish a normal vascular patterning (S4E Fig, S4F Fig, S4G Fig and S4H Fig).
To address whether the kmt2dzy59 vascular defects were driven by abnormal endothelial cell proliferation, we profile endothelial cell cycle by fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS). In order to assess this, single embryos with distinguishable wild-type or mutant phenotypes were dissociated for FACS, using kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) embryos and tg(Kdrl:GFP) wild-type siblings at 3 dpf and 7 dpf (Fig 4E and 4F; S4 Fig). Strikingly, our results showed no significant difference in endothelial cell cycle profile at 3 dpf (unpaired t test, p = 0.4, t = 0.86 dF = 12 n.s.). In contrast, at 7 dpf, kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) embryos showed a significant reduction in proliferative endothelial cells (Fig 4F; t test, p = 0.0001, t = 5.56 dF = 12; n = 7 per genotype). Endothelial/endocardial cell proliferation was also analyzed by confocal analysis of phospho S10 Histone 3 (pH3) marker at 3dpf and 5dpf (S8 Fig and S7A Fig and S7C Fig). At 3 dpf, kmt2dzy59 mutants did not show statistically significance alterations in the number of endothelial/endocardial mitotic cells (S8 Fig, t test p = 0.076, dF = 7.92, N = 5 embryos per genotype). However, at 5 dpf, the difference in mitotic endothelial and endocardial cells between wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59 mutants was statistically significance (Fig 7G and 7H, p = 0.001 in AA and p = 0.0307 in endocardium and S7A Fig and S7C Fig). These data indicate that the vascular misspatterning in kmt2dzy59 mutants is not driven by reduced cell proliferation at early developmental stages when the cardiovascular system is being established but by a reduction in proliferation at later stages. In contrast to normal proliferation at 3 dpf, there was a strong reduction in EC proliferation at 5 dpf and 7 dpf, particularly evident in the area of the vasculature that irrigates the gills (S7A Fig; white dashed line), which are normally established from 5 dpf to 7 dpf through active cell proliferation from vessels derived from AA3 to AA6 [47]. Overall, these results demonstrate key roles of Kmt2d in zebrafish for vascular patterning, with mutants displaying defects in both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis.
kmt2dzy59 mutants fail to initiate AA3 to AA6 formation
In zebrafish, AA1 forms at 24 hpf, coincident with the time when circulation begins. A vestigial AA2 also forms at this time point, which is immediately replaced by the opercular artery (ORA). AA3 to AA6 emerge later, between 2 dpf and 2.5 dpf [47,48]. As described above, kmt2dzy59 mutants are able to form AA1 and the ORA, but they fail to form the subsequent AAs. Additionally, our data indicate that endothelial cell proliferation is normal in kmt2dzy59 mutants at 3 dpf, the time point at which the gross embryological phenotypes begin to appear. We explored 2 possible mechanisms for the absence of AA3 through AA6 in kmt2dzy59 mutants: (1) arch patterning fails to initiate at 2 dpf, or (2) alternatively, AA3 to AA6 vascular patterniing is initiated normally but at a later stage the arches become atrophic and regress. To test these possibilities, we performed live time-lapse analysis of AA development in wild-type tg(kdrl:GFP) siblings and kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) mutants from 2 dpf to 3 dpf.
At 2 dpf, kmt2dzy59 mutants have normal gross morphology, but time-lapse imaging revealed thinner blood vessels and abnormal AA sprouting when compared with their wild-type siblings (Fig 5A–5D). Interestingly, kmt2dzy59 mutants were not able to form the primary AA sprouts during the duration of data acquisition (Fig 5B–5B‴, 5D and 5Dʹ, S4 Video), whereas wild-type embryos succeeded in developing and extending AA3 through AA6 (Fig 5A–5A‴, 5C and 5Cʹ, S3 Video). This result suggests that kmt2d mutants do not initiate the formation AA3 to AA6 within the same time interval as their wild-type counterpart. On the other hand, the time-lapse videos showed unusually high levels of endothelial cell activity in the area were the AAs should emerge (ventral boundary of the lateral dorsal aorta [LDA]), suggesting that AA could develop at a later time point. To investigate this possibility, embryos subjected to time-lapse analysis were recovered for 5 hours and processed for IF and confocal analysis. At approximately 3 dpf, kmt2d mutants showed primary sprouting of abnormal AA3 to AA6 that were not present at earlier stages (Fig 5E and 5F). This indicates that kmt2d mutants eventually form atretic AAs around 3 dpf that will ultimately become vestigial at later time points (Fig 4A and 4B).
Ectopic endothelial sprouting in kmt2dzy59 mutants
Our superresolution confocal analysis of the 3 dpf embryos found distinctive aberrant sprouting of endothelial cells from AA1 and ORA in kmt2dzy59 embryos (Fig 5F, white arrowheads). This observation led us to test the hypothesis that angiogenesis defects in in kmt2d mutants involve ectopic blood vessels formation. To test this hypothesis, we performed time-lapse analysis of AA development in wild-type tg(kdrl:GFP) siblings and kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) mutants at a later time point, from 3 dpf to 4 dpf. At 3 dpf (72 hpf), aberrant blood vessel phenotypes were apparent in kmt2d mutants, with both decreased vessel lumens and abnormal patterning (Fig 5G and 5H). Strikingly, by 10 hours later (82 hpf), kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) mutants showed ectopic endothelial cell sprouting, emerging from the AA1 and ORA (Fig 5G, 5G", 5H' and 5H"; arrowheads; Fig 5I and 5I", red arrowheads). These cells possessed many long and dynamic filopodia extending towards apposing cells with similar comportment. This aberrant hyperactive sprouting resembles tip cell morphology seen during normal angiogenesis [49]. However, in the context of kmt2dzy59 mutants, the observed tip cell-like behavior occurred in aberrant (ectopic) positions, ultimately producing ectopic blood vessels (Fig 5H‴ and 5I‴, S5 Video, wild-type control; S6 Video kmt2d mutant). This ectopic and abnormal endothelial cell behavior was also observed at the level of AA3 as well as in other regions of the recorded area (S6 Video kmt2d mutant), suggesting that the tip-like phenotype can potentially occur in any endothelial cell of kmt2dzy59 mutants.
Ectopic blood vessel formation is a well described response to hypoxia conditions [50]. Considering the reduced lumen size in kmt2d mutant blood vessels, we asked whether ectopic blood vessel formation was a consequence of hypoxia response mechanisms. To test this, we induced hypoxia by treatment with dimethyloxalylglycineinduced (DMOG), an inhibitor of HIF-prolyl hydroxylases, which thereby stabilizes Hif-1 and triggers hypoxia response even in normoxia conditions [51]. Tg(kdrl:GFP) wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) mutant embryos were treated from 3 dpf to 4 dpf with DMOG and DMSO as control. After treatment, embryos were washed and processed for IF and confocal imaging. At 4 dpf, wild-type embryos treated with DMOG showed ectopic vessel sprouting at the level of the optic vein (OV; S5A Fig and S5B Fig, white arrow). In contrast, AA1 and ORA were not altered by DMOG treatment (S5A Fig and S5B Fig), suggesting that these vessels have a higher resistance threshold to hypoxia. Interestingly, kmt2d mutant embryos treated with DMOG did not show any additional vessel sprouting (S5B Fig and S5D Fig) beyond the ectopic blood vessel sprouting from the AA1 and ORA in normoxia (S5B Fig and S5D Fig; white arrow), indicating that hypoxia does not increase or alter the ectopic blood vessels formed in kmt2d mutants. These results suggest that the aberrant endothelial cell behavior and ectopic blood vessel sprouting seen in kmt2d mutants are not due to hypoxia response and that Kmt2d functions to suppress ectopic or hyperactive angiogenesis. Altogether, these results demonstrate that Kmt2d is required for the timely and normal development of AA3 to AA6 in zebrafish.
Notch signaling is hyperactivated in endocardial and endothelial cells of kmt2d mutants
The ectopic tip cell-like phenotype led us to investigate an iconic molecular mechanism involved in tip-stalk cell identity as well as in endocardium patterning during cardiogenesis: Notch signaling pathway. Multiple studies in mice, zebrafish, cell culture, and tumor models have shown that Notch pathway is a key regulator of vertebrate vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [52–58]. Considering our discovery of ectopic angiogenesis in kmt2d mutants and previous observations that Notch signaling regulates endocardial and endothelial cell growth, differentiation, and patterning, we investigated whether kmt2d mutants have altered Notch signaling activity. We injected kmt2d CRISPR/Cas9 into a Notch signaling reporter line tg(tp1:EGFP)um14 [59] and performed F0 kmt2d mosaic mutants analysis [60] (S6 Fig) to assess Notch signaling activity in kmt2d mutants. At 3 dpf, Notch signaling in the zebrafish heart was strongly active in endocardial cells of the outflow tract and AV canal, with weaker activity in some endocardial cells of the ventricle (Fig 6A; GFP positive cells). Interestingly, in kmt2d mutants, the number of endocardial cells with positive Notch activity was significantly increased in both ventricle and atrium (Fig 6B and 6C t test, p = 0.0001 in ventricle t = 4.95 dF = 36, atrium p = 0.0001, t = 10.99 dF = 36 n = 7 per treatment). These transgene reporter results indicate that Notch signaling is cell autonomously hyperactivated in kmt2d mutant endocardial cells. To validate that endogenous Notch signaling is altered in kmt2d mutants, we assayed endogenous components of the Notch pathway in kmt2dzy59 mutants by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and IF at 3 dpf. Of these components, only transcripts of Notch-specific transcription factor rbpja were increased in kmt2dzy59 mutants, whereas the notch1b receptor and the downstream target hes1 mRNA levels were comparable to the transcripts level found in wild-type siblings (Fig 6D). To investigate whether elevated expression of rbpja mRNA resulted in elevated Rbpj protein expression, we performed immunofluorescence against Rbpj Notch transcription factor and compared protein levels in the heart in wild-type tg(Kdrl:GFP) siblings and kmt2dzy59;tg(Kdrl:GFP) mutants. At 5 dpf, Rbpj protein was present in all heart tissues, with enhanced Rbpj protein accumulation in kmt2dzy59 mutants, with well-defined nuclear localization. To quantify this elevated expression in endothelial/endocardial cells and to determine whether this increased Rbpj protein expression started at earlier stages, we performed single embryo FACS of tg(Kdrl:GFP) wild-type siblings and kmt2dzy59;tg(Kdrl:GFP) mutants at 3dpf. Embryos were processed for immunofluorescence against GFP (driven by Kdrl in endothelial/endocardial cells) and Rbpj. After gating for single cells, samples were gated for GFP to exclusively study the endothelial/endocardial single cell population. Subsequently we measured in EC the percentage of Rbpj positive cells and the Rbpj Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) as an indicative of protein expression levels (Fig 6D). Consistent with our previous cell counting results, we observed that the overall number of Rbpj positive cells in EC from wild-type sibling and kmt2dzy59 mutants is equivalent at 3 dpf (Fig 5A, % of EC Rbpj positive, unpaired t test, p = 0.69, t = 0.42 dF = 6 n.s.). Crucially, the MFI values in kmt2dzy59 mutant ECs were significantly higher, indicating elevated Rbpj protein levels in Kmt2d-deficient endothelial/endocardial cells (Fig 6D, t test p = 0.0015, t = 5.51, dF = 6).
Pharmacological inhibition of Notch signaling rescues cardiovascular development in Kabuki Syndrome zebrafish
Our results showed hyperactivation of Notch activity in endocardial and endothelial cells of kmt2d mutants, suggesting a molecular mechanism for the cardiovascular phenotype in KS. To test whether interference with this mechanism could rescue the cardiovascular phenotype in kmt2dzy59, we inhibited the Notch pathway at the level of the Notch receptor cleavage by blocking y-secretase activity with DAPT (Fig 7E) [58,61]. kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) embryos and wild-type tg(kdrl:GFP) siblings were treated with DAPT or DMSO (control group) from 1 dpf to 2 dpf and were washed and assessed at 5 dpf for cardiovascular development. Wild-type embryos treated with DAPT had other phenotypes predicted from inhibiting Notch as previously described by Arslanova and colleagues [61]: abnormal somite development, heart edema, disrupted vasculature. Confocal images of wild-type DAPT-treated embryos revealed aberrant heart morphology with hypoplastic ventricle and stretched cardiac tube, likely a consequence of pericardic edema (Fig 7A and 7B) evidenced by myosin staining of the sternohyoideus muscle (Fig 7A–7D asterisks, magenta labeling). Strikingly, DAPT treatment partially rescued AA development and heart morphology in kmt2dzy59 mutant embryos (Fig 7D). Heart ventricle volume was significantly increased in kmt2dzy59 DAPT-treated embryos compared with the control groups: DMSO kmt2dzy59 embryos and wild-type DAPT-treated embryos (Fig 7F; two-way ANOVA multiple comparison test, n = 10 per condition, adjusted p-values per group; see figure legend for p-value details).
We then asked whether the rescue of AA and heart development by Notch inhibition was due to a change in the proliferative capability of endothelial/endocardial cells. To test this, we analyzed cell proliferation by pH3 labeling and counted GFP positive cells (endothelial and endocardial cells) co-localizing with pH3 in a delineated area (S7A Fig; white dashed line). Our analysis showed that DAPT treatment of kmt2d mutants induces a significant increase in the number of proliferating endothelial and endocardial cells in the AA area and heart, respectively.
Pharmacological inhibition of Notch signaling reestablishes Rbpj protein levels in kmt2d mutant endothelial and endocardial cells
Since kmt2dzy59 mutants showed increased levels of the Notch transcription factor Rbpj in endocardial and endothelial cells (Fig 6E–6G), we asked whether inhibition of Notch signaling with DAPT could rescue this phenotype. To test this, kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) embryos and wild-type tg(kdrl:GFP) siblings were treated with DAPT (or DMSO as a control) from 1 dpf to 2 dpf and were washed and grown until 3 dpf. Embryos were then fixed and genotyped by tail-clipping followed by DNA extraction and HRMA. Samples were processed for immunofluorescence against Rbpj and GFP (Kdrl:GFP transgenic enhancement) and analyzed by confocal imaging and FACS.
In agreement with our previous confocal imaging analysis in 5 dpf embryos (Fig 6E and 6F), Rbpj protein levels were increased at 3 dpf in kmt2dzy59 mutants when compared with their wild-type siblings (Fig 8A, 8Aʹ, 8C and 8Cʹ). Remarkably, Rbpj protein expression was locally enhanced in the area corresponding to endocardial cells (Fig 8Cʹ, arrow). DAPT-treated kmt2dzy59 embryos showed a substantial general reduction in Rbpj signal (Fig 8D and 8Dʹ) that is particularly distinctive in endocardial cells (Fig 8D and 8Dʹ). In order to quantify this, we proceeded with FACS analysis to measure Rbpj MFI exclusively in endothelial and endocardial cells (GFP positive cells) in individual embryos as described above. Also, to assess the temporal resolution of Rbpj protein levels rescue, we performed this FACS experiment with 2 dpf and 3 dpf embryos.
Our results showed that at 2 dpf, Notch pathway inhibition with DAPT does not affect Rbpj protein levels in any of the analyzed groups, as reflected in similar MFI values (Fig 8E). In contrast, at 3 dpf, Rbpj MFI values were significantly increased in DMSO (control-treated) kmt2dzy59 compared with DMSO-treated wild-type siblings. DAPT treatment resulted in reducing these values to basal Rbpj MFI levels, similar to those observed in wild-type control group (Fig 8F, two-way ANOVA multiple comparison test, n = 4 per condition, adjusted p-values per group; see figure legend for p-value details). These results substantiate our findings that Notch signaling is hyperactivated in kmt2d mutants, resulting in increased Rbpj expression in endocardial/endothelial cells and further support the hypothesis of a regulatory link between the Notch pathway and Kmt2d.
Pharmacological inhibition of Notch signaling rescues endothelial patterning and ectopic blood vessel formation in zebrafish kmt2d mutants
Our endothelial cell analysis in kmt2d mutants revealed an aberrant endothelial cell behavior as early as 2 dpf that precedes disruption of normal AA development (Fig 5A–5C). Moreover, we showed that some endothelial cells located in the region of AA development display tip cell-like phenotypes and generate ectopic blood vessel initiation (Fig 5G–5I). Considering that DAPT treatment was able to partially rescue AA development (Fig 7) and dampen down Notch signaling levels in kmt2dzy59 mutants to wild-type levels (Fig 8), we decided to test whether DAPT would be able to rescue the early endothelial phenotype and reduce ectopic blood vessel sprouting in the AA development area.
We treated kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) embryos and wild-type tg(kdrl:GFP) siblings with DAPT or DMSO from 1 dpf to 2 dpf. At 2 dpf, embryos were washed and immediately processed for in vivo time-lapse confocal microscopy. A total number of 24 embryos (12 DMSO controls and 12 DAPT treated) were assigned unique identifiers and imaged laterally, focusing on the AA development region. Images were taken every 20 minutes for a period of 10 hours. Cohorts were imaged from 2 dpf to 2.5 dpf and from 3 dpf to 3.5 dpf. After imaging period, embryos were recovered and individually genotyped.
Our results indicated that Notch pathway inhibition with DAPT from 1 dpf to 2 dpf was capable of substantially rescuing AA formation in kmt2dzy59 mutants, including early endothelial cell behavior in the ventral border of the lateral dorsal aorta (LDA) where AA structures emerge (S5–S8 Videos, Fig 9A–9D), followed by substantially rescued formation of AA3 through AA6 by 3.5 dpf (S9–S12 Videos, Fig 9H). Interestingly, observed occasional ectopic blood vessel formation in kmt2dzy59 DAPT-treated mutants at 2 dpf but at lower frequencies than untreated mutants. This indicated that Notch signaling inhibition was not able to completely rescue this phenotype at early stages (Fig 9D, arrowhead). However, this lower frequency of ectopic sprouts did not result in ectopic vessels, because 3 dpf kmt2dzy59 DAPT-treated mutants did not show ectopic blood vessels (S9–S12 Videos, Fig 9H). Moreover, the hyperactive endothelial cell behavior that is observable in the junction between LDA and AA1 in kmt2dzy59 mutant from the DMSO control group was not observed in DAPT-treated kmt2dzy59 mutants (S14 Video, Fig 9G, arrowhead and Fig 9H). These results emphasize the utility of this Kabuki Syndrome model in discovering fine details of cardiovascular development and strengthen the hypothesis of a regulatory link between Notch signaling and Kmt2d in vasculogenesis.
Discussion
Kabuki Syndrome is a rare multisystemic developmental disorder mainly characterized by postnatal growth deficit, distinct facial features, hearing defects, abnormal neurologic development, immune dysfunction, and CHD, predominantly left-sided defects and coarctation of the aorta [1,3,62]. These cardinal features contribute to KS phenotypes with variable expressivity and different severity degrees. However, patient prognosis and morbidity mainly depends on early diagnosis and treatment of CHD and immune dysfunction [23]. The mechanisms through which KMT2D mutations affects cardiovascular development remain unclear. Development and validation of a genetic KS animal model that provides a strong platform for high-resolution analysis of cardiovascular phenotypes will allow a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of KMT2D-related CHD in a KS context.
In this study, we developed a genetic zebrafish model for Kabuki Syndrome that not only recapitulated cardinal phenotypic traits of the human pathology but, most importantly, allowed us to uncover previously unknown cardiovascular defects precipitated by abnormal endothelial/endocardial cell patterning. Through a combination of transcriptome analysis, F0 kmt2d mosaic mutants screening, and FACS, we identified Notch signaling in endocardial/endothelial cells as a candidate pathway underlying cardiovascular phenotypes. We also demonstrated that altered Notch pathway signaling was driven at the level of its nuclear transcription factor Rbpj. Importantly, drug inhibition of Notch signaling was able to restore Rbpj levels in endocardial/endothelial cells to normal levels and rescue multiple cardiovascular phenotypes in KS mutants (Fig 10).
Notch pathway is a known regulator of endocardium and vascular patterning during vertebrates’ development [54,63]. Rbpj is the major transcriptional effector of Notch signaling [64]. Recent studies in Drosophila demonstrated that KMT2D binds nuclear Notch co-activator complex [65], establishing a strong precedent of a regulatory link between Notch pathway and KMT2D in invertebrates [66]. This report is consistent with our findings that loss of kmt2d produces a misbalance of Notch signaling at the level of transcription factor regulation. Our results demonstrate that Rbpj is up-regulated at the transcript and protein level in zebrafish kmt2d mutants.
During canonical Notch signaling, ligand-receptor interactions of Notch components drives sequential proteolytic cleavage of the Notch receptor and nuclear translocation of the intracellular domain of Notch (NICD). Once there, NICD binds to the effector protein RBP-J and enables the induction of target genes by recruitment of co-activators in a cell-context dependent manner [67]. However, NICD cleavage also occurs independently of Notch ligand-receptor interaction, thereby providing basal levels of NICD that will bind Rbpj and regulate Notch signaling in a noncanonical fashion [68,69]. In line with this paradigm, our results show that the canonical ligands and receptors of Notch pathway upstream of Rbpj are not affected in kmt2d mutants, suggesting that at least part of the response in kmt2d mutants is due to a misbalance of noncanonical Notch activity. Additionally, manipulating availability of NICD (canonical and noncanonical) by inhibiting its proteolytic cleavage with DAPT allowed us to rescue the kmt2d mutant endocardial phenotype, vascular phenotypes, Rbpj protein levels, and aberrant endothelial cell behavior. Our interpretation is that Kmt2d and Notch signaling operate in cardiovascular development under a stringent Goldilocks principle: hyperactivated Notch signaling (kmt2d mutants) or too little Notch signaling (DAPT treatment in wild-type) is deleterious to normal endocardial and endothelial cell development, and that DAPT treatment of kmt2d mutants resolves a sufficient “just right” balance of Notch signaling to allow partial rescue of mutant phenotypes. Altogether, these data indicate that the regulatory link between Kmt2d and Rbpj during cardiovascular development occurs in part via noncanonical Notch pathway in a ligand-independent manner. However, under the current paradigm, this hypothesis cannot entirely explain the full extent of our results. Even though the observed vascular mispatterning, ectopic angiogenesis and disorganized endocardium in our kmt2d mutants fits with a Notch pathway dysregulation, we do not assume that the underlying molecular mechanisms are the same in each scenario. Further studies are needed in order to fully understand the link of Kmt2d and noncanonical Notch pathway in the context of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis.
Pioneering studies demonstrated the importance of Kmt2d during myocardium development in mammals but did not test a possible role in early endocardium morphogenesis [22]. In this sense, our results in zebrafish kmt2d mutants demonstrate for the first time a strong contribution of the endocardium to the hypoplastic ventricle phenotype described here. In contrast to our finding of a fundamental role of Kmt2d during endocardium patterning during zebrafish heart development, our myocardium analysis does not support a myocardial kmt2d mutant phenotype. Thus, we propose that the hypoplastic ventricle and overall cardiac phenotype in Kabuki Syndrome is mainly driven by endocardium mispatterning.
Current knowledge in Kmt2d function is focused on its roles as a H3K4 methyltrasferase [70]. However, not much is known about Kmt2d gene regulatory networks, and it is not known whether Kmt2d has nonhistone substrates. Our transcriptome data provides evidence for a broader functional spectrum of Kmt2d and offers strong gene candidates that we are pursuing in order to comprehend the multisystemic phenotype in zebrafish KS phenotype. Furthermore, our gene set enrichment analyses suggest that genes coding for core ECM proteins have a strong early contribution in kmt2dzy59 mutant’s phenotype. This result suggests that the observed angiogenesis defect in kmt2dzy59 might be a consequence of an abnormal ECM, as previously demonstrated in other disease scenarios such as cancer development [71]. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the observed endothelial/endocardial phenotypes are not not due to cell identity/specification failure nor hypoxia stress but due to defects in the maintenance of cell behaviors.
Overall, these results indicate a novel regulatory link between Kmt2d and Notch pathway in cardiovascular patterning and suggest a possible therapeutic approach for ameliorating KS phenotypic traits of diseases caused by Kmt2d mutations.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Zebrafish embryos, larvae, and adults were produced, grown, and maintained according to standard protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Utah, protocol number 18–05006. For experiments, zebrafish embryos ranging from 1 dpf to 7 dpf were used. Adults were maintained at approximately 5 fish per liter for all experiments in aquarium with controlled light cycle and water temperature at 28°C. Animals were fed 3 times a day. Published strains used in this study include: wild-type AB, tg(kdrl:EGFP)la116 [72] and Tg(EPV.Tp1-Mmu.Hbb:EGFP)um14 referred in this manuscript as tg(tp1:EGFP)um14 [73].
Method details
Mutants generation and genotyping
Mutants were generated in AB wild-type background. Mutagenesis was induced with CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tools. Guide RNA was designed and synthesized at the University of Utah Mutation Generation and Detection Core Facility (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Uath). Guide RNA was designed using as template kmt2d sequence available in Genome build Z version 9, Ensembl annotation released version 79. Guide RNA target sequence corresponding to exon 8 is as following: 5ʹ-GTATTGACTGTGGCATGCGA-3ʹ. Genotyping was performed through HRMA [74] using CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System. HRMA primer sequences are: forward, 5ʹ-AGT TTT AGC GGT GCC GTG TG-3ʹ; reverse, 5ʹ-CCA CTG TTC AGA GCC AGG AAG-3ʹ. Mutations were confirmed by DNA Sanger sequencing at the DNA Sequencing Core Facility (University of Utah. Salt Lake City, Utah) using the primers: forward, 5ʹ-AGC TTG TAC AGA AGT TTG GCA A-3ʹ; reverse, 5ʹ-GGA AAA GTA CAC TTT AGA AAA CAG C-3ʹ. Multiple alleles were isolated with approximately 5 to 8 independent founders per allele. Mutation was confirmed and phenotypes analyzed in all of them. Lines are maintained as heterozygous in a kdrl:EGFP transgenic background.
RNA extraction for RNA sequencing experiment
RNA was extracted from 50 individual embryos at 1 dpf obtained from a heterozygous by heterozygous(kmt2d+/zy59) cross from 2 parental crosses. We recorded parent ID and order of processing for each embryo to be able to adjust for technical and biological variability. Genomic DNA and total RNA was extracted using Quick-DNA/RNA extraction kit from Zymo (Zymo Research. Irvine, California). After genotyping by HRMA, 6 embryos of each genotype (wild type, heterozygous, and mutant) were selected, with 3 embryos from each of 2 parental crosses. A total of 18 samples were selected, considering processing order and submitted to the High-Throughput Genomics and Bioinformatic Analysis Shared Resource at Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah (University of Utah. Salt Lake City, Utah). RNA concentrations per sample were on average 8 ng-μL and the RNA integrity Numbers (RINs) were 9 or higher. Libraries were built using Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Preparation Kit with polyA selection (Illumina, San Diego, California) and sequencing protocol was HiSeq 125 Cycle Paired-End Sequencing version 4. The 18 samples were multiplexed in 3 sequencing lanes.
Alcian Blue/Red alizarin and O-Dianisidine staining
Staining was performed at 4 dpf as previously described by Walker and colleagues [75]. For O-Dianisidine experiment (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri. Catalog D9143-5G), 6 dpf embryos were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. Fixed embryos were washed in PBS for 3 times and then incubated in the staining buffer (0.6 mg/mL o-dianisidine, 10 mM sodium acetate [pH 5.2], 0.65% hydrogen peroxide, and 40% ethanol) for 15 minutes in the dark.
Immunofluorescence
Embryos were fixed over night in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS with triton 0.4%. Fixed embryos were washed with PBS 1× + triton 0.2% (PBST) 3 times for 15 minutes each in a rotator at room temperature. Pigment was removed, incubating embryos for 15 minutes in a solution containing KOH 0.8%, Tween20 0.1%, H2O2 0.9%, and H2O to final volume, washed 3 times for 15 minutes each with PBST, and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with blocking solution (PBST + 5% goat serum). Primary antibody incubation was performed over night at 4°C. Primary antibody was removed and samples were washed with PBST 3 times for 30 minutes each. Samples were incubated with secondary antibody over night at 4°C.
Antibody dilutions were performed in PBST with 1% goat serum.
After secondary antibody incubation, samples were washed with PBST 3 times for 30 minutes each and rinsed for 15 minutes with increasing concentrations of glycerol (30%, 50%, and 80%) in PBS 1×. Stained samples were mounted in low melt agarose at 1% for confocal imaging.
Primary antibody concentration was established following manufacturer guidelines; secondary antibody concentration was 1:500 in all cases. Antibodies are detailed in the Key Resource Table. Anti-GFP antibody was used to enhance endogenous transgenic fluorescence detection in tg(kdrl:GFP) line. Nuclear staining is not shown in processed images, but it was performed for cell quantification experiments. DAPI was used in a concentration of 1 mg.ml−1 and applied during secondary antibody incubation step.
Single-embryo FACS
Embryos were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence as described in the previous section. After secondary antibody incubation and washes, samples were distributed placing 1 single embryo per 1.5 mL tube. PBST was completely removed and 1 mL of prewarmed TrypLE (1×) solution (ThermoFisher Scientific. Waltham, Massachusetts) was added in each tube. Samples were incubated for 1.5 hours at 37°C. Pipetting every 10 minutes was performed to aid in dissociation. At the end of 1.5 hours, solution was checked for cell aggregates. TrypLE reaction was stopped by adding CaCl2 to a final concentration of 1 mM and fetal bovine serum (ThermoFisher Scientific. Waltham, Massachusetts) to 10%. Each sample was filtered through a 40 μm nylon mesh filter (Fisher 22363547; ThermoFisher Scientific. Waltham, Massachusetts) into a 50 mL tube. Filtered samples were spun down at 2,500 RPM for 10 minutes at 4°C. Supernatant was discarded and cells of each individual embryo were resuspended in 300 μL of PBS 1×.
For cell cycle profiling, cells were resuspended in DAPI staining solution (Triton 0.1%, PBS 1×, DAPI 1 mg.ml−1). For accurate sample gating, controls in each experiment included: samples without fluorescence (for excluding yolk autofluorescence), samples without fluorescence with secondary antibody incubation only (for excluding secondary antibody unspecificity), samples with DAPI, samples with fluorescence of interest, and samples with DAPI and fluorescence of interest. Samples were processed for flow cytometry analysis on a BD FACS Canto and Propel Labs Avalon Cell Sorter at the University of Utah Flow Cytometry Facility. FACS data was analyzed with FlowJo (version 9) software (https://www.flowjo.com/).
Confocal images acquisition, processing, and analysis
Images were acquired in Zeiss LSM880 with Airyscan fast module following optimal parameters for superresolution (SR) mode acquisition. Image acquisition was performed keeping the same laser parameters for the channel of interests (channel to be measured/quantified). Acquisition parameters corresponding to context markers were enhanced as required for image clarity. Output files were processed for Airyscan processing with Zen Black software keeping default parameters. Output files (.czi) were processed with Fiji (ImageJ) to build maximum intensity projections for slides of interests or the complete data set.
Imaris software (version 9.2; Bitplane. https://imaris.oxinst.com/) was used to reconstruct 3D microscopy images, measure heart ventricle volume, cell count, and cell morphology numbers. The Imaris surfaces feature was used to analyze the volume of the ventricle by generating a surface in the lumen of each ventricle. Endocardial cells were used as a limit so the space delimited by them was considered ventricle lumen and measured. Cell numbers were gathered by creating a surface containing the channel corresponding to myocardium, endocardium, or Notch positive cells, and the channel corresponding to DAPI was masked in each tissue/cell specific surface. The measurement points tool was used to count number of nuclei in each surface.
Myocardial cells area and circularity were measured using the surfaces tool in manual mode. Alcama antibody was used a reference marker for myocardial cell limits. The clipping plane feature of Imaris was used to visualize each cell and validate the surface created. Details of this method can be found in S3 Fig legend.
Time-lapse experiments
Time-lapse experiments were performed in embryos from a kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) het by het cross at 2 dpf, 3 dpf, and 4 dpf. In each case, genotype was confirmed at the end of the experiment by phenotype screening and HRMA. Samples were placed in embryo water with N-Phenylthiourea 1× (PTU) for avoiding pigment formation and anaesthetized with MS-222 (150 mg/L−1). Samples were embedded in 0.6% low melt agarose with MS-222 in embryo water.
Acquisition was performed in Zeiss LSM880 with Airyscan fast module using 10× dry objective and default optimum parameters. Parameters of acquired data as follow: 16 bit depth image, 1.8 zoom, 1176 × 1176 pixels image size and minimum z-stack interval for capturing development of AA (approximately 467.56 × 467.56 × 2.88 μm). Images were acquired every 20 minutes for a length of 12 hours. After acquisition period, samples were recovered for genotyping and/or immunofluorescence and SR confocal imaging.
F0 experiment—kmt2d mosaic analysis
For analyzing the effects of kmt2d mutation in a Notch reporter background, the kmt2 guide RNA/Cas9 (described in the section Mutant generation) was injected in tg(tp1:EGFP)um14 embryos. Approximately 100 embryos per clutch were injected, and 40 of them were processed for kmt2d mutation validation though HRMA. Injected embryos showed a range of phenotype from mild to strong effects. A total of 7 embryos per condition (injected–not injected) were selected based on their gross morphology similarity with class II kmt2dzy59 mutants (Fig 1B).
qPCR experiment
A total of 3 dpf wild-type/heterozygous and kmt2zy59 mutant embryos were lysed in TRI Reagent (Zymo) and processed for RNA using a Zymo Quick-RNA kit. The total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with BioRad iScript 5× master mix (BioRad Laboratories. Hercules, California. Catalog 4106228). Subsequent cDNA was used for qPCR reactions (CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System) with the following gene primers: notch1b, rbpja, hes1, and elfα. Primer and probe sequences are listed in the Key Resources table (S3 Table). ΔCt calculations were normalized to elfα expression levels and control sibling expression levels. The number of samples used was N = 4 per genotype with 2 technical replicates per gene and per genotype assessed.
Pharmacological treatment
For Notch pathway inhibition, embryos from a kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) het by het cross were treated with 50 μM DAPT (Selleckchem. Houston, Texas. Catalog S2215) from 1 dpf to 2 dpf. After treatment, embryos were washed with fresh embryo water and immediately processed for time-lapse experiment or maintained until 3 dpf or 5 dpf for immunofluorescence sample processing depending on the experiment. After fixation, DAPT-treated embryos were tail-clipped for DNA extraction and genotypification by HRMA. All treatments, including controls, were as follows: wild-type DMSO, wild-type DAPT, kmt2dzy59 DMSO, and kmt2dzy59 DAPT.
For hypoxia induction, tg(kdrl:GFP) and kmt2dzy59;tg(kdrl:GFP) embryos were treated from 3 dpf to 4 dpf with 100 μM DMOG (HIF-Hydroxylase Inhibitor). After treatment, embryos were washed and processed for IF and confocal imaging. DMSO was used as control for drug solvent in mutant and wild-type genotypes.
Quantification and statistical analysis
General statistical analysis
Sample sizes were chosen based on previous publications and are defined in each figure legend. No sample was excluded from the analysis. Unless explicitly expressed in the text or figure legend (Fig 7F and 7H, S3C Fig), the experiments were not randomized, and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment. All statistical values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation with exception of S3A and S3C Fig were 25th percentile, 50th percentile, and 75th percentile are shown. Sample sizes, statistical test, and p-values are indicated in the figures or figure legends. Statistical significance was assigned at p < 0.05. Statistical tests were performed using Prism 7 software (GraphPad, https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/) and R package.
RNA differential expression analysis
Transcriptome was aligned with STAR [76] to Genome build Z version 9, Ensembl annotation released version 79. In this study, differential expression analysis was performed between 6 wild-type versus 6 mutant samples with DESeq2 [77] using the negative binomial likelihood ratio test. Heterozygous samples were excluded from this analysis. An initial cutoff of 5% false discovery rate was set.
GSEA
To perform GSEA analysis, we used the differential expression analysis gene list ranked by p-values. We then filtered the list to obtain genes that have one-to-one orthology to human genes as specified in the Ensembl Compara database that were retrieved with BiomaRt package [78]. Gene sets obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). The resulting list was additionally filtered using a mean normalized count cutoff of 5. The number of resulting genes identifiers analyzed was 9,128 out of 33,737.
GSEA preranked analysis (10,000,000 permutations, minimum term size of 15, maximum term size of 500) was then performed using fgsea package (https://github.com/ctlab/fgsea/)[79]
The analysis was performed independently with 8 selected gene sets and subsets from MSigDB: H: hallmark gene sets, CP: Canonical pathways, CP: KEGG: KEGG gene sets, CP:REACTOME: Reactome gene sets, BP: GO biological process, CC: GO cellular component, MF: GO molecular function, C7: immunologic signatures. Results cutoff was set at 5% FDR and plotted using R programming interface.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Saulius Sumanas, Dr. Nathan Lawson, and Dr. Neil Chi for providing reagents or transgenic fish lines. We specially thank all lab members from H. J. Yost lab and Dr. R. Dorsky for feedback and results discussion.
Abbreviations
- AA
aortic arch
- AA1
mandibular arch
- AA2
hyoid arch
- AA3
first branchial arch
- AA4
second branchial arch
- AA5
third branchial arch
- AA6
fourth branchial arch
- ACeV
anterior cephalic vein
- ADAM
containing a disintegrin and metalloprotease
- AV
atrioventricular
- avc
atrioventricular canal
- α-ac-tub
alpha acetylated tubulin
- BRAF
v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1
- CHD
congenital heart defect
- Ct
cycle threshold
- ΔΔCt
delta-delta cycle threshold
- CtA
central artery
- DCV
dorsal ciliary vein
- DLV
dorsal longitudinal vein
- DMOG
dimethyloxalyglycineinduced
- dpf
days post fertilization
- EC
endocardial and/or endothelial cells
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- ey
eye
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- F0
filial 0
- FACS
fluorescent activated cell sorting
- FDR
false discovery rate
- G0
generation 0
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- GO
gene ontology
- GSEA
gene set enrichment analysis
- HA
hypobranchial artery
- het
heterozygous
- HRMA
High Resolution Melt Analysis
- HMG
High Mobility Group domain
- H3K4
lysine 4 of histone 3
- ie
inner ear
- IF
immunofluorescence
- IOC
inner optic circle
- kdrl
kinase insert domain receptor like
- KMT2D
Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase 2D
- LDA
lateral dorsal aorta
- LRT
Likelihood Ratio Test
- MAPK
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MFI
Median Fluorescence Intensity
- MF20
Myosin Heavy Chain Antibody
- MIP
maximum intensity projection
- mo
mouth
- MsigDB
Molecular Signatures Database
- MsV
mesencephalic vein
- NCA
nasal ciliary artery
- NES
Normalized Enrichment Score
- NICD
Notch intracellular domain
- n.s.
not significant
- OMIM
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man
- ORA
opercular artery
- OV
optic vein
- oft
outflow tract
- PHD
Plant Homeo Domain
- pH3
phospho Histone 3
- RAS
retrovirus-associated DNA sequence
- RIN
RNA integrity number
- RNA-seq
RNA sequencing
- RT-qPCR
reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- SET
Su-Enhancer-of-zeste and Trithorax
- sgRNA
single-guide RNA
- SR
superresolution
- VA
ventral aorta
- ventr/ven
ventricle
Data Availability
Data Availability RNA sequencing data used for building Fig 1D is available in S1 Table. Complete results from gene set enrichment analysis are available in S2 Table. Raw data is available in the following repository: https://b2b.hci.utah.edu/gnomex/gnomexFlex.jsp?requestNumber=475R Contact for reagent and resource sharing Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, H. Joseph Yost (jyost@genetics.utah.edu).
Funding Statement
Funding Acknowledgments: This study was funded by a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Bench-to-Bassinet Consortium (http://www.benchtobassinet.com) grant to HJY (UM1HL098160) and a core facilities support grant to CCHCM (U01HL131003). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or the National Institutes of Health. Imaging was performed at the Fluorescence Microscopy Core Facility, a part of the Health Sciences Cores at the University of Utah. Microscopy equipment was obtained using a NCRR Shared Equipment Grant # 1S10RR024761-01. FACS was supported by the University of Utah Flow Cytometry Facility in addition to the National Cancer Institute through Award Number 5P30CA042014-24 and by the National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 1S10RR026802-01. MAS supported in part by American Association of Anatomists Postdoctoral Fellowship and American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (18POST34050020). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Niikawa N, Kuroki Y, Kajii T, Matsuura N, Ishikiriyama S, Tonoki H, et al. Kabuki make-up (Niikawa-Kuroki) syndrome: A study of 62 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1988;31: 565–589. 10.1002/ajmg.1320310312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iida T, Park S, Kato K, Kitano I. Cleft Palate in Kabuki Syndrome: A Report of Six Cases. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2006;43: 756–761. 10.1597/05-174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matsumoto N, Niikawa N. Kabuki make-up syndrome: A review. Am J Med Genet. 2003;117C: 57–65. 10.1002/ajmg.c.10020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paik JM, Lim SY. Kabuki syndrome with cleft palate. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43: 474–476. 10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Igawa HH, Nishizawa N, Sugihara T, Inuyama Y. Inner ear abnormalities in Kabuki make-up syndrome: Report of three cases. Am J Med Genet. 2000;92: 87–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tekin M, Fitoz S, Arici S, Cetinkaya E, Incesulu A. Niikawa-Kuroki (Kabuki) syndrome with congenital sensorineural deafness: Evidence for a wide spectrum of inner ear abnormalities. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70: 885–889. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adam M, Hudgins L, Hannibal M. Kabuki Syndrome. Manag Genet Syndr Third Ed. 2010; 469–477. 10.1002/9780470893159.ch32 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paderova J, Drabova J, Holubova A, Vlckova M, Havlovicova M, Gregorova A, et al. Under the mask of Kabuki syndrome: Elucidation of genetic-and phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with Kabuki-like phenotype. Eur J Med Genet. Elsevier; 2018; 0–1. 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Verrotti A, Agostinelli S, Cirillo C, D’Egidio C, Mohn A, Boncimino A, et al. Long-term outcome of epilepsy in Kabuki syndrome. Seizure. BEA Trading Ltd; 2011;20: 650–654. 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurahashi N, Miyake N, Mizuno S, Koshimizu E, Kurahashi H, Yamada K, et al. Characteristics of epilepsy in patients with Kabuki syndrome with KMT2D mutations. Brain Dev. The Japanese Society of Child Neurology; 2017;39: 672–677. 10.1016/j.braindev.2017.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim J, Lee CG. Coinheritance of Novel Mutations in SCN1A Causing GEFS + and in KDM6A Causing Kabuki Syndrome in a Family. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2017;47: 229–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Butcher DT, Cytrynbaum C, Turinsky AL, Siu MT, Inbar-feigenberg M, Mendoza-londono R, et al. CHARGE and Kabuki Syndromes: Gene-Specific DNA Methylation Signatures Identify Epigenetic Mechanisms Linking These Clinically Overlapping Conditions. Am J Hum Genet. ElsevierCompany.; 2017;100: 773–788. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dentici ML, Di Pede A, Lepri FR, Gnazzo M, Lombardi MH, Auriti C, et al. Kabuki syndrome: clinical and molecular diagnosis in the first year of life. Arch Dis Child. 2014; 1–7. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yoon JK, Ahn KJ, Kwon BS, Kim GB, Bae EJ, Noh C Il, et al. The strong association of left-side heart anomalies with Kabuki syndrome. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58: 256–62. 10.3345/kjp.2015.58.7.256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yuan SM. Congenital heart defects in Kabuki syndrome. Cardiol J. 2013;20: 121–124. 10.5603/CJ.2013.0023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shah M, Bogucki B, Mavers M, deMello DE, Knutsen A. Cardiac conduction abnormalities and congenital immunodeficiency in a child with Kabuki syndrome: Case report. BMC Med Genet. 2005;6: 1–8. 10.1186/1471-2350-6-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Digilio MC, Gnazzo M, Lepri F, Lisa M, Elisa D, Anwar P, et al. Congenital heart defects in molecularly proven Kabuki syndrome patients. Am J Med Genet. 2017; 1–11. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ng SB, Bigham AW, Buckingham KJ, Hannibal MC, McMillin MJ, Gildersleeve HI, et al. Exome sequencing identifies MLL2 mutations as a cause of Kabuki syndrome. Nat Genet. 2010;42: 790–793. 10.1038/ng.646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sakata S, Okada S, Aoyama K, Hara K, Tani C, Kagawa R, et al. Individual clinically diagnosed with CHARGE syndrome but with a mutation in KMT2D, a gene associated with Kabuki syndrome: A case report. Front Genet. 2017;8: 1–6. 10.3389/fgene.2017.00001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Froimchuk E, Jang Y, Ge K. Histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferase KMT2D. Gene. Elsevier; 2017;627: 337–342. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.06.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ang S-Y, Uebersohn A, Spencer CI, Huang Y, Lee J-E, Ge K, et al. KMT2D regulates specific programs in heart development via histone H3 lysine 4 di-methylation. Development. 2016;143: 810–821. 10.1242/dev.132688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ang S, Uebersohn A, Spencer CI, Huang Y, Lee J, Ge K. KMT2D regulates specific programs in heart development via histone H3 lysine 4 di-methylation. Co Biol. 2016; 810–821. 10.1242/dev.132688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adam MP, Hudgins L, Hannibal M. Kabuki Syndrome. Gene Rev. 2016; [Google Scholar]
- 24.Laarhoven PM Van, Neitzel LR, Quintana AM,Geiger EA, Zackai EH, Clouthier DE, et al. Kabuki syndrome genes KMT2D and KDM6A: functional analyses demonstrate critical roles in craniofacial, heart and brain development. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24: 4443–4453. 10.1093/hmg/ddv180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kok FO, Shin M, Ni C-W, Gupta A, Grosse AS, van Impel A, et al. Reverse Genetic Screening Reveals Poor Correlation between Morpholino-Induced and Mutant Phenotypes in Zebrafish. Dev Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2015;32: 97–108. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vogan K. Zebrafish mutants versus morphants. Nat Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2015;47: 105–105. 10.1038/ng.3208 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bedell VM, Westcot SE, Ekker SC. Lessons from morpholino-based screening in zebrafish. Brief Funct Genomics. 2011;10: 181–188. 10.1093/bfgp/elr021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bögershausen N, Tsai I, Pohl E, Özlem P, Kiper S, Beleggia F, et al. RAP1-mediated MEK / ERK pathway defects in Kabuki syndrome. 2015;125: 3585–3599. 10.1172/JCI80102DS1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsai I-C, McKnight K, McKinstry SU, Maynard AT, Tan PL, Golzio C, et al. Small molecule inhibition of RAS/MAPK signaling ameliorates developmental pathologies of Kabuki Syndrome. Sci Rep. Springer US; 2018;8: 10779 10.1038/s41598-018-28709-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bögershausen N, Tsai I, Pohl E, Özlem P, Kiper S, Beleggia F, et al. RAP1-mediated MEK / ERK pathway defects in Kabuki syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2015;125: 3585–3599. 10.1172/JCI80102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheon C-K, Ko JM. Kabuki syndrome: clinical and molecular characteristics. Korean J Pediatr. 2015;58: 317–24. 10.3345/kjp.2015.58.9.317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y. RNA-seq: An assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res. 2008; 1509–1517. 10.1101/gr.079558.108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mork L, Crump G. Zebrafish Craniofacial Development: A Window into Early Patterning. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;115: 239–269. 10.1080/10937404.2015.1051611.INHALATION [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Digilio MC, Gnazzo M, Lepri F, Dentici ML, Pisaneschi E, Baban A, et al. Congenital heart defects in molecularly proven Kabuki syndrome patients. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2017;173: 2912–2922. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Van Laarhoven PM, Neitzel LR, Quintana AM, Geiger EA, Zackai EH, Clouthier DE, et al. Kabuki syndrome genes KMT2D and KDM6A: functional analyses demonstrate critical roles in craniofacial, heart and brain development. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24: 4443–4453. 10.1093/hmg/ddv180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leigh Ann Samsa, Betsy Yang and JL. Embryonic Cardiac Chamber Maturation: Trabeculation, Conduction and Cardiomyocyte Proliferation. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;18: 1199–1216. 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.07.011.Innate [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee J, Fei P, Packard RRS, Kang H, Xu H, Baek KI, et al. 4-Dimensional light-sheet microscopy to elucidate shear stress modulation of cardiac trabeculation. 2016;126: 1–12. 10.1172/JCI83496.(LVNC) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu J, Bressan M, Hassel D, Huisken J, Staudt D, Kikuchi K, et al. A dual role for ErbB2 signaling in cardiac trabeculation. Development. 2010;137: 3867–3875. 10.1242/dev.053736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Samsa LA, Yang B, Liu J. Embryonic cardiac chamber maturation: Trabeculation, conduction, and cardiomyocyte proliferation. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163: 157–168. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Auman HJ, Coleman H, Riley HE, Olale F, Tsai HJ, Yelon D. Functional modulation of cardiac form through regionally confined cell shape changes. PLoS Biol. 2007;5: 0604–0615. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wilkinson RN, Jopling C, van Eeden FJM. Zebrafish as a Model of Cardiac Disease. Chapter 4. Vasculogenesis. 2014. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2014;124:65–91. 10.1016/B978-0-12-386930-2.00004-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Asnani A, Peterson RT. The zebrafish as a tool to identify novel therapies for human cardiovascular disease. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7: 763–767. 10.1242/dmm.016170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grochot-Przeczek A. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis Blood vessel formation Lecture. 2014, Department of Medical Biotechnology of the Jagiellonian University. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Potente M, Gerhardt H, Carmeliet P. Review Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Angiogenesis. Cell. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;146: 873–887. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schuermann A, Helker CSM, Herzog W. Angiogenesis in zebrafish. Semin Cell Dev Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2014; 1–9. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zheng PP, Severijnen LA, Willemsen R, Kros JM. Haemoglobin staining for in vivo portraying of functional vasculature in experimental zebrafish embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;380: 823–824. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Isogai S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM. The vascular anatomy of the developing zebrafish: an atlas of embryonic and early larval development. Dev Biol. 2001;230: 278–301. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Anderson MJ, Pham VN, Vogel AM, Weinstein BM, Roman BL. Loss of unc45a precipitates arteriovenous shunting in the aortic arches. Dev Biol. 2008;318: 258–267. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Eilken HM, Adams RH. Dynamics of endothelial cell behavior in sprouting angiogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;22: 617–625. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Elks PM, Renshaw SA, Meijer AH, Walmsley SR, van Eeden FJ. Exploring the HIFs, buts and maybes of hypoxia signalling in disease: lessons from zebrafish models. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8: 1349–1360. 10.1242/dmm.021865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Raghunath M, Sy Wong Y, Farooq M, Ge R. Pharmacologically induced angiogenesis in transgenic zebrafish. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;378: 766–771. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.11.127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Blanco R, Gerhardt H. VEGF and Notch in tip and stalk cell selection. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3: 1–19. 10.1101/cshperspect.a006569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ping Z, Xianchun YAN, Yan C, Ziyan Y, Hua HAN. Notch signaling in blood vessels: from morphogenesis to homeostasis. 2014;57: 774–780. 10.1007/s11427-014-4716-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Roca C, Adams RH. Regulation of vascular morphogenesis by Notch signaling Regulation of vascular morphogenesis by Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 2007;21: 2511–2524. 10.1101/gad.1589207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Garg V. Notch Signaling in Aortic Valve Development and Disease. Etiology and Morphologenesis of Congenital Heart Disease. 2016. pp. 371–376. 10.1007/978-4-431-54628-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pestel J, Ramadass R, Gauvrit S, Helker C, Herzog W, Stainier DYR. Real-time 3D visualization of cellular rearrangements during cardiac valve formation. 2016; 2217–2227. 10.1242/dev.133272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Beis D, Bartman T, Jin S-W, Scott IC, D’Amico L a, Ober E a, et al. Genetic and cellular analyses of zebrafish atrioventricular cushion and valve development. Development. 2005;132: 4193–4204. 10.1242/dev.01970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Han P, Bloomekatz J, Ren J, Zhang R, Grinstein JD, Zhao L, et al. Coordinating cardiomyocyte interactions to direct ventricular chamber morphogenesis. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;534: 700–704. 10.1038/nature18310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Parsons MJ, Pisharath H, Yusuff S, Moore JC, Arndt F, Lawson N, et al. Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech Dev. 2009;126: 898–912. 10.1016/j.mod.2009.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shankaran SS, Dahlem TJ, Bisgrove BW, Yost HJ, Tristani-firouzi M. CRISPR / Cas9-Directed Gene Editing for the Generation of Loss-of-Function Mutants in High-Throughput Zebrafish F 0 Screens. 2017; 1–22. 10.1002/cpmb.42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Arslanova D, Yang T, Xu X, Wong ST, Augelli-Szafran CE, Xia W. Phenotypic analysis of images of zebrafish treated with Alzheimer’s gamma-secretase inhibitors. BMC Biotechnol. 2010;10: 24 10.1186/1472-6750-10-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dugan S. Kabuki Syndrome In: Cassidy S, Battaglia A, Carey J, Viskochil D, editors. Cassidy and Allanson’s Management of Genetic Syndromes Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley& Sons, Inc. In press; 2018. pp. 469–477. 10.1002/9780470893159.ch32 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Luxan G, D’Amato G, MacGrogan D, De La Pompa JL. Endocardial Notch Signaling in Cardiac Development and Disease. Circ Res. 2016;118: e1–e18. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.305350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Borggrefe T, Oswald F. The Notch signaling pathway: Transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66: 1631–1646. 10.1007/s00018-009-8668-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Oswald F, Rodriguez P, Giaimo BD, Antonello ZA, Mira L, Mittler G, et al. A phospho-dependent mechanism involving NCoR and KMT2D controls a permissive chromatin state at Notch target genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44: 4703–4720. 10.1093/nar/gkw105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Giaimo BD, Oswald F, Borggrefe T, Daniele B, Oswald F, Borggrefe T, et al. Dynamic chromatin regulation at Notch target genes. Transcription. Taylor & Francis; 2017;8: 61–66. 10.1080/21541264.2016.1265702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schwanbeck R, Martini S, Bernoth K, Just U. European Journal of Cell Biology The Notch signaling pathway: Molecular basis of cell context dependency. Eur J Cell Biol. Elsevier GmbH.; 2011;90: 572–581. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Díaz-Trelles R, Scimia MC, Bushway P, Tran D, Monosov A, Monosov E, et al. Notch-independent RBPJ controls angiogenesis in the adult heart. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 12088 10.1038/ncomms12088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shang Y, Smith S, Hu X. Role of Notch signaling in regulating innate immunity and inflammation in health and disease. Protein Cell. Higher Education Press; 2016;7: 159–174. 10.1007/s13238-016-0250-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Froimchuk E, Jang Y, Ge K. Histone H3 lysine 4 methyltransferase KMT2D. Gene. Elsevier; 2017;627: 337–342. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.06.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lu P, Weaver VM, Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression. J Cell Biol. 2012;196: 395–406. 10.1083/jcb.201102147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mathias JR, Dodd ME, Walters KB, Yoo SK, Erik A, Huttenlocher A. FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2010;33: 1212–1217. 10.1016/j.dci.2009.07.003.Characterization [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nicoli S, Standley C, Walker P, Hurlstone A, Fogarty KE, Lawson ND. microRNA-mediated integration of haemodynamics and Vegf signaling during angiogenesis. Nature. 2010;464: 1196–1200. 10.1038/nature08889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Parant JM, George S a., Pryor R, Wittwer CT, Yost HJ. A rapid and efficient method of genotyping zebrafish mutants. Dev Dyn. 2009;238: 3168–3174. 10.1002/dvdy.22143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Walker MB, Kimmel CB. A two-color acid-free cartilage and bone stain for zebrafish larvae. Biotech Histochem. 2007;82: 23–28. 10.1080/10520290701333558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15: 1–21. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Durinck S, Spellman PT, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/ Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4: 1184–1191. 10.1038/nprot.2009.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Korotkevich G, Sergushichev A. Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Package ‘fgsea.’ 2018. Version 1.10.1 [software] https://github.com/ctlab/fgsea/. Available from: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/manuals/fgsea/man/fgsea.pdf [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data Availability RNA sequencing data used for building Fig 1D is available in S1 Table. Complete results from gene set enrichment analysis are available in S2 Table. Raw data is available in the following repository: https://b2b.hci.utah.edu/gnomex/gnomexFlex.jsp?requestNumber=475R Contact for reagent and resource sharing Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, H. Joseph Yost (jyost@genetics.utah.edu).