Abstract
In this report, we present familial cases of urothelial carcinoma. To investigate the possibility of hereditary urothelial cancer, we performed semiconductor-based next-generation DNA sequencing. A woman in her 80s who had bladder and left ureteral cancer was hospitalized in Sapporo Shirakaba-dai Hospital due to consciousness disturbance. Radiographic evaluation revealed multiple liver metastases and she died 38 days later. Needle necropsy was done for a left ureteral tumor that continued to her bladder tumor and for liver metastases. At the same time, her son in his 60s, who also had muscle-invasive bladder cancer, was admitted to Sapporo Medical University Hospital and underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by laparoscopic radical cystectomy. DNA was isolated from both cancers and normal controls in each case and analyzed by massive parallel sequencing of 409 cancer-related genes using a targeted, multiplex PCR approach followed by semiconductor sequencing. Somatic mutations of KMT2C and KMT2D were detected in the mother’s tumor. Copy number gains of FGFR1, IkBKB, NFkB2, FGFR2, and FLT3 and copy number losses of IGF2R and TP53 were also found in her cancer. In her son’s tumor, somatic mutations of FGFR3 and EP300 were identified. Copy number gains of IkBKE/MAPK1/PARP1, EGFR, BRAF, IRS2, MAPK2K1, IGF1R, and ERBB2 and copy number loss of TP53 were also found in his cancer. There were no germline gene mutations related to familial urothelial carcinoma. Although somatic mutation of TP53 was a common feature, these cases with urothelial carcinoma might not be the result of a heredity syndrome.
Keywords: Urothelial cancer, Familial cancer, Next-generation sequencing
Introduction
More than four hundred thousand bladder cancers (BCas) were newly diagnosed worldwide in 2012 [1]. Although numerous BCas are diagnosed, hereditary BCas are rarely reported. On the other hand, several hereditary diseases that may cause upper urinary tract cancer (UUTCa) have been reported. Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutations in one or more DNA mismatch repair genes that predispose patients to not only colorectal cancers but also UUTCas [2, 3]. The lifetime risk of UUTCa in patients diagnosed with LS is 14–22 times higher than in the general population [4]. The spectrum of LS is well reported in colon cancer, endometrial cancer and UUTCas. Moreover, recent studies have reported the possibility that the LS spectrum may include bladder cancer [5–7], although this remains controversial.
Costello syndrome (CS) is also known as a hereditary disease that may result in bladder cancers. CS is a rare hereditary disease, with only around 400 cases reported worldwide. In CS, there are germline mutations in the HRAS gene that cause several disorders, including BCas [8].
Since general urologists encounter hereditary diseases relatively rarely, genetic examinations in familial cases are not routinely conducted. We report two familial bladder cancer cases simultaneously treated in two different hospitals for which we conducted genetic characterization to explore the possibility of inherited disease.
Case 1 (mother)
An 87-year-old woman without a history of smoking visited Sanjukai hospital presenting asymptomatic gross hematuria. Cystoscopy was performed to investigate the possibility of bladder tumors. A papillary sessile bladder tumor was found at the left ureteral orifice. In computed tomography, a left atrophic kidney with severe hydronephrosis was observed. Since the woman was elderly and had poor performance status and severe dementia, the clinician decided not to perform transurethral resection of the bladder tumor. Finally, best supportive care for the symptoms was decided. Five months after the initial hospital visit, anemia progressed and blood transfusion was performed. Approximately a year after the initial visit, the patient lost consciousness and was hospitalized in Shirakaba-dai Hospital. At that time, multiple liver metastases and a left ureteral tumor (previously observed at the left ureteral orifice) that extended to the bladder tumor were seen in CT evaluation and she finally died from urothelial cancer. Needle necropsy of the left ureteral tumor connected to the bladder tumor and liver metastases was performed. Based on hematoxylin and eosin staining, urothelial carcinoma and neuroendocrine cancer were suspected. Additional immunohistochemical staining was p63 positive and GATA3 positive. Thus, the final pathological conclusion was high-grade urothelial carcinoma in the bladder, left ureter, and liver.
Case 2 (son)
A 67-year-old man with a smoking history who had asymptomatic gross hematuria visited a general hospital and was referred to Sapporo Medical University Hospital. Cystoscopic and CT evaluations showed a 55 mm papillary sessile bladder tumor. No hydronephrosis or ureteral malignancy was observed in radiographic examinations. Because of a large intravesical tumor and severe gross hematuria, the ureteral orifices could not be detected by cystoscopy. To confirm the tumor pathology, TUR-BT was performed. Histopathological examination revealed that the tumors were high-grade urothelial carcinomas. According to preoperative enhanced MRI, the clinical T stage of the bladder cancer was cT3b, without metastases in CT evaluation. Therefore, he underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) for four cycles and received laparoscopic radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy and construction of an ileal conduit. Three weeks after surgery, he left the hospital without any trouble. In the final pathological report, the tumor was pT1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma without lymph node metastasis (none of 65 lymph nodes). No obvious pathological effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was detected. The patient is alive with no evidence of disease 18 months after the radical surgery. Since we confirmed that his mother died from invasive bladder cancer, we decided to perform semiconductor-based next-generation DNA sequencing for these cases to explore the possibility of inherited bladder cancer.
Genomic DNA extraction
Paraffin blocks from the mother were cut as 8 mm sections on plain glass slides. Targeted regions for sampling were marked on adjacent hematoxylin and eosin sections by the study pathologist and recovered by scrape macrodissection. DNA was then extracted using a QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA, catalog number 56404) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA from frozen samples and normal blood of the son were extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, catalog number 51304) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Normal tissue (mother) and peripheral blood (son) were used to remove germline mutations.
Genetic testing
Barcoded libraries were generated from 40 ng of DNA per sample using the Ion AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel and Ion AmpliSeq Library Kit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, catalog number 4475345) following the manufacturer’s protocol. This panel contains 15,992 primer pairs in four tubes and targets almost all coding regions of 409 genes known to be related to cancer. Sequencing of templates after emulsion PCR was performed as previously described [9, 10].
Signal processing, mapping to the reference genome (hg19), and quality control were performed in Torrent Suite version 5.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Somatic variants (point mutations, insertions, and deletions) were called using the Ion Reporter software 5.0 AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel tumor-normal pair workflow (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number 4477685) and default settings. A sequencing coverage of 20 × and a minimum variant frequency of 10% of the total number of distinct tags were used as cutoffs. Mutations were called if they occurred in < 0.1% of reads in the normal control. Germline variants were also analyzed using the Ion Reporter software 5.0 AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel single sample workflow (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Alignment was visually inspected with Integrative Genomics Viewer software (http://www.broadinstitute.org/igv). Copy number variation (CNV) detection was also performed with the Ion Reporter software using an algorithm based on a hidden Markov model. Recurrent genomic regions with CNVs were identified using copy numbers greater than 3 and less than 1 for gains and losses, respectively.
Results
Somatic mutations of KMT2C and KMT2D were detected in the tumors from both the mother and son, and somatic mutations of FGFR3 and EP300 were identified (Table 1). Copy number gains of FGFR1, IkBKB, NFkB2, FGFR2, and FLT3 and copy number losses of IGF2R and TP53 were also observed in the mother’s cancer (Fig. 1). Copy number gains of IkBKE/MAPK1/PARP1, EGFR, BRAF, IRS2, MAPK2K1, IGF1R, and ERBB2 and copy number loss of TP53 were found in the son’s cancer (Fig. 2). No inherited germline mutations related to familial urothelial carcinomas were observed.
Table 1.
Somatic mutations detected in this report
| Sample | Gene | Mutation type | Protein change | Coding | SIFT | PolyPhen-2 | Grantham | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Son | FGFR3 | chr4:1806092 | Missense | p.Ser371Cys | c.1111A>T | 0 | 0.97 | 112 |
| EP300 | chr22:41553299 | Nonsense | p.Tyr1131Ter | c.3393_3394delTA | NA | NA | NA | |
| RNF213 | chr17:78311659 | Missense | p.Leu1565Phe | c.4695G>C | 0 | 0.563 | 22 | |
| Mother | KMT2C | chr7:151945007 | Missense | p.Gly838Ser | c.2512G>A | 0 | 1 | 56 |
| KMT2D | chr12:49427282 | Nonsense | p.Gln3736Ter | c.11206C>T | NA | NA | NA | |
| KMT2D | chr12:49445202 | Frameshift insertion | p.Arg755fs | c.2263_2264insC | NA | NA | NA | |
| PIK3CG | chr7:106508260 | Missense | p.Ala85Val | c.254C>T | 0.1 | 0.063 | 64 |
NA not available
Fig. 1.
Copy number alterations in son
Fig. 2.
Copy number alterations in mother
Discussion
Lynch syndrome is well known to predispose patients to the risk of UUTCa, as well as colon cancer. However, whether to include bladder cancer in the LS spectrum is under discussion [11]. Since the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) in bladder cancer is low (3–5%) [4], the relationship between LS and bladder cancer has been considered slight. Conversely, a correlation between LS and an increased risk of bladder cancer was reported. Van der Post et al. investigated 19 LS families and found 21 bladder cancers. Moreover, 87.5% of the bladder cancer tissue was MSI positive, which indicates LS etiology [12]. Exploration of the possibility of a hereditary aspect in these urothelial cancers may benefit patients not only with regard to the screening for other malignancies but also the treatment decision. Hollande et al. reported the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy in patients having “hereditary-like” UUTCa such as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-associated tumors [13]. Thus, investigating germline mutations in familial urothelial cancers may be an option in familial cases.
In our report, the mother (case 1) had bladder and ureteral cancer in her 80s and the son (case 2) at his 60s. Considering her age at diagnosis, it was not a typical situation for inherited cancer. However, it is of great interest that these cases had a hereditary-like aspect. Though no germline mutation was detected in these cases, somatic mutations were observed. In the son’s tumor, FGFR3 mutation was observed. Sung et al. reported the correlation of FGFR3 somatic mutation and sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy [14]. In their study, for bladder cancer patients having FGFR3 mutation, poor overall survival was confirmed among those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, FGFR3 mutation could be a guide for the use of anti-FGFR3 therapy [15]. EP300 is one of the most mutated genes in bladder cancer [16] and there is a clinical trial evaluating the use of the histone deacetylase inhibitor mocetinostat for patients having EP300 mutation (NCT02236195). A previous study reported the potential aggressiveness of urothelial cancers having both EP300 and FGFR3 mutations [16]. Moreover, a case of a bladder cancer patient having RNF213 mutation that resulted in rapid tumor growth has been reported [17]. Thus, we should be aware of possible recurrence in case 2. Moreover, in case 2, the patient had copy number gains in the ERBB2 and EGFR genes. Interestingly, overexpression of these two genes has been reported to have a correlation with a higher tumor grade and recurrence rate [18]. Thus, both gene mutation and CNVs may be clinically implicated in bladder cancers. Although we could not demonstrate germline mutations in these patients, exploring gene mutations in urothelial cancers may be useful for precision medicine in the future.
Abbreviations
- BCa
Bladder cancer
- NMIBC
Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
- MIBC
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
- CDDP
Cisplatin
Funding
None.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hampel H, Frankel WL, Martin E, et al. Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barrow P, Khan M, Lalloo F, et al. Systematic review of the impact of registration and screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1719. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rouprêt M, Yates DR, Comperat E, et al. Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas and other urological malignancies involved in the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) tumor spectrum. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1226–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Joost P, Therkildsen C, Dominguez-Valentin M, Jonsson M, Nilbert M. Urinary tract cancer in Lynch syndrome; increased risk in carriers of MSH2 mutations. Urology. 2015;86(6):1212–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Skeldon SC, Semotiuk K, Aronson M, Holter S, Gallinger S, Pollett A, et al. Patients with Lynch syndrome mismatch repair gene mutations are at higher risk for not only upper tract urothelial cancer but also bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;63(2):379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Win A, Young J, Lindor N, Tucker K, Ahnen D, Young G, et al. Colorectal and other cancer risks for carriers and noncarriers from families with a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(9):958–964. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beukers W, Hercegovac A, Zwarthoff EC. HRAS mutations in bladder cancer at an early age and the possible association with the Costello syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(6):837–839. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nakagaki T, Tamura M, Kobashi K, Omori A, Koyama R, Idogawa M, Ogi K, Hiratsuka H, Tokino T, Sasaki Y. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 50 cancer-related genes in Japanese patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2018;40(9):1010428318800180. doi: 10.1177/1010428318800180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakagaki T, Tamura M, Kobashi K, Koyama R, Fukushima H, Ohashi T, Idogawa M, Ogi K, Hiratsuka H, Tokino T, Sasaki Y. Profiling cancer-related gene mutations in oral squamous cell carcinoma from Japanese patients by targeted amplicon sequencing. Oncotarget. 2017;15(35):59113–59122. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang D, Matin SF, Lawrentschuk N, Roupret M. Systematic review: an update on the spectrum of urological malignancies in Lynch Syndrome. Bladder Cancer. 2018;3:261–268. doi: 10.3233/BLC-180180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Van der Post RS, Kiemeney LA, Ligtenberg MJL, Witjes JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Bodmer D, Schaap L, Kets CM, van Krieken JH, Hoogerbrugge N. Risk of urothelial bladder cancer in Lynch syndrome is increased, in particular among msh2 mutation carriers. J Med Genet. 2010;47:464–470. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.076992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hollande C, Colin P, de La Motte Rouge T, Audenet F, Yates DR, Phé V, Ouzzane A, Droupy S, Ruffion A, de La Taille A, Guy L, Cussenot O, Rozet F, Xylinas E, Zerbib M, Spano JP, Khayat D, Bitker MO, Rouprêt M. Hereditary-like urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract benefit more from adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy than do sporadic tumours. BJU Int. 2014;113:574–580. doi: 10.1111/bju.12308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sung JY, Sun JM, Chang Jeong B, Seo S, Soo Jeon S, Moo Lee H, Yong Choi H, Young Kang S, Choi YL, Young Kwon G. FGFR3 overexpression is prognostic of adverse outcome for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Urol Oncol. 2014;1:e23–e31. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pouessel D, Neuzillet Y, Mertens LS, van der Heijden MS, de Jong J, Sanders J, Peters D, Leroy K, Manceau A, Maille P, Soyeux P, Moktefi A, Semprez F, Vordos D, de la Taille A, Hurst CD, Tomlinson DC, Harnden P, Bostrom PJ, Mirtti T, Horenblas S, Loriot Y, Houédé N, Chevreau C, Beuzeboc P, Shariat SF, Sagalowsky AI, Ashfaq R, Burger M, Jewett MA, Zlotta AR, Broeks A, Bapat B, Knowles MA, Lotan Y, van der Kwast TH, Culine S, Allory Y, van Rhijn BW. Tumor heterogeneity of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations in invasive bladder cancer: implications for perioperative anti-FGFR3 treatment. Ann Oncol. 2016;7:1311–1316. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duex JE, Swain KE, Dancik GM, Paucek RD, Owens C, Churchill MEA, Theodorescu D. Functional impact of chromatin remodeling gene mutations and predictive signature for therapeutic response in bladder cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2018;1:69–77. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Olanoa AR, Bellmunta J, Rodrigob A, Álvarezb L, Terrádezb A, García-Foncillasb J, Laesc JF. A case report demonstrating the potential clinical benefit of exhaustive molecular profiling in an aggressive muscle-invasive high-grade metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Case Rep Oncol. 2017 doi: 10.1159/000477337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wei L, Youquan W, Shubo T, Qishuo R, Tian Z, Guo H, Zhuo L, Guowen L. Overexpression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and HER-2 in bladder carcinoma and its association with patients’ clinical features. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7178–7185. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


