Abstract
Background:
Many patients undergoing laminoplasty develop postoperative loss of cervical lordosis or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine despite sufficient preoperative lordosis. This results in poor surgical outcomes.
Methods:
Here, we reviewed the relationship between multiple radiological parameters of cervical alignment that correlated with postoperative loss of cervical lordosis in patients undergoing laminoplasty.
Results:
Patient with a high T1 slope (T1S) has more lordotic alignment of the cervical spine preoperatively and is at increased risk for the loss of cervical lordosis postlaminoplasty. Those with lower values of difference between T1S and Cobb’s angle (T1S-CL) and CL-T1S ratio have higher risks of developing a loss of the cervical lordosis postoperatively. Alternatively, C2-C7 lordosis, neck tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis had no role in predicting the postlaminoplasty kyphosis.
Conclusion:
Among various radiological parameters, the preoperative T1S is the most important factor in predicting the postoperative loss of the cervical lordosis/alignment following laminoplasty.
Keywords: Cervical laminoplasty, Loss of cervical lordosis, T1 slope, C2-C7 lordosis, C2-C7 Cobb’s angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, C2-C3 disc angle
INTRODUCTION
Although laminectomy has better long-term clinical and radiological outcomes, laminoplasty is still favored for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy as it preserves the cervical range of motion (ROM) with a lower risk of postoperative kyphosis.[3,14-17]. Despite an adequate preoperative cervical lordosis, increases in the T1 slope (T1S) may result in postlaminoplasty kyphosis.[1,2,4-6] Here, we highlight the relationship between T1S and other radiological indicators of cervical alignment and correlate these with postlaminoplasty kyphosis/loss of lordosis.
METHODS
Measures of cervical alignment
Multiple studies have described various indices that help predict the risk of loss of cervical lordosis in postlaminoplasty patients [Table 1, Figure 1].[9,11-13]
Table 1:
Description of indices affecting cervical alignment.
Figure 1:
The lateral X-ray of cervical spine showing various radiological measurements.
RESULTS
T1S
The T1S is one of the most important indices that can help predict the postlaminoplasty loss of cervical lordosis. Notably, the preoperative cervical lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb’s angle) was greater in patients with higher T1S versus those with lower T1S; these patients have a higher risk of kyphosis postlaminoplasty.[2,5-7,18] Lee et al.[10] concluded that patients with a T1S of >29° are more likely to exhibit postlaminoplasty kyphosis/loss of lordosis of more than 5° versus those with T1S of <29°.
C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA)
Several studies have shown that the preoperative C2-C7 SVA had no significant correlation with the postlaminoplasty loss of cervical lordosis.[2,5,6,18] Alternatively, Zhang et al.[18] concluded that C2-C7 SVA was positively correlated with loss of cervical lordosis following laminoplasty.[2,5,6,18] Lin et al.[13] showed the combined effect of T1S and C2-C7 SVA on predicting loss of cervical lordosis. Patient with low T1S (≤20°) and large C2-C7 SVA (>22 mm) surprisingly had an increased cervical lordosis postlaminoplasty.
Other factors are predictive of postlaminoplasty kyphosis
There are multiple other factors that predict postlaminoplasty kyphosis. Li et al.[11] concluded that patients with high Cobb’s angle-T1S ratio (CL/T1S) have a higher risk of kyphosis versus those with low CL/T1S. Kim et al.[5] and Zhang et al.[18] showed no relationship between cervical ROM and the risk for postoperative kyphosis. Similar to cervical ROM, neck tilt (NT) a measure of cervical spine tilt with respect to sternum, also does not predict the loss of cervical lordosis following laminoplasty.[6] Thoracic kyphosis (TK) is, however, directly related to cervical lordosis.[8] Cephalad vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty has also emerged as a new risk factor for loss of cervical lordosis following laminoplasty.
CONCLUSION
A high T1S and C2-C7 SVA are the most predictive factors for postlaminoplasty kyphosis. Those risk factors that do not contribute to this include; (1) the preoperative C2-C7 lordosis, NT, cervical ROM, and TK.
Footnotes
How to cite this article: Sharma R, Borkar SA, Goda R, Kale SS. Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications. Surg Neurol Int 2019;10:147.
Contributor Information
Ravi Sharma, Email: aiims.ravisharma@gmail.com.
Sachin A. Borkar, Email: sachin.aiims@gmail.com.
Revanth Goda, Email: revanth2k7@gmail.com.
Shashank S. Kale, Email: skale67@gmail.com.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Azuchi M, Imura S, et al. Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: A magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol. 1996;243:626–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00878657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cho JH, Ha JK, Kim DG, Song KY, Kim YT, Hwang CJ, et al. Does preoperative T1 slope affect radiological and functional outcomes after cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E1575–81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Ohmori K, Nakamura H, Kimura T, et al. Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:129–39. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069889.31220.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim P, Murata H, Kurokawa R, Takaishi Y, Asakuno K, Kawamoto T, et al. Myoarchitectonic spinolaminoplasty: Efficacy in reconstituting the cervical musculature and preserving biomechanical function. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:293–304. doi: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim TH, Lee SY, Kim YC, Park MS, Kim SW. T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E992–7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182972e1b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim B, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Yi S, Shin DA, Lee CK, et al. Relationship between T1 slope and loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2016;16:219–25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kretzer RM, Hsu W, Hu N, Umekoji H, Jallo GI, McAfee PC, et al. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: An in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E778–85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824780b8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee SH, Son ES, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kim KT. Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: Correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J. 2015;15:705–12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee SH, Lee JS, Sung SK, Son DW, Lee SW, Song GS, et al. A lower T1 slope as a predictor of subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60:567–76. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0404.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee BS, Walsh KM, Lubelski D, Knusel KD, Steinmetz MP, Mroz TE, et al. The effect of C2-3 disc angle on postoperative adverse events in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;30:38–45. doi: 10.3171/2018.6.SPINE1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li XY, Kong C, Sun XY, Guo MC, Ding JZ, Yang YM, et al. Influence of the ratio of C2-C7 cobb angle to T1 slope on cervical alignment after laminoplasty. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e659–66. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lin S, Zhou F, Sun Y, Chen Z, Zhang F, Pan S, et al. The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:127–35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3605-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lin BJ, Hong KT, Lin C, Chung TT, Tang CT, Hueng DY, et al. Impact of global spine balance and cervical regional alignment on determination of postoperative cervical alignment after laminoplasty. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e13111. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nakanisi K. Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy. Spinal Cord. 1999;37:20–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ratliff JK, Cooper PR. Cervical laminoplasty: A critical review. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:230–8. doi: 10.3171/spi.2003.98.3.0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, Kawaguchi H, Akune T, Anamizu Y, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:479–87. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Geest S, de Vormer AM, Arts MP, Peul WC, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL. Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(Suppl 2):229–35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang JT, Li JQ, Niu RJ, Liu Z, Tong T, Shen Y, et al. Predictors of cervical lordosis loss after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1205–10. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-4971-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]