Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2019;20(7):2203–2208. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2203

Somatic Mitochondrial Mutations in Oral Cavity Cancers among Senegalese Patients

Silly Toure 1, Fatimata Mbaye 2,*, Mame Diarra Gueye 2, Malick Fall 3, Ahmadou Dem 4, Mbacké Sembene 2
PMCID: PMC6745208  PMID: 31350985

Abstract

Background:

Somatic mutations affecting the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been frequently observed in human cancers and proposed as important oncological biomarkers. However, the exact mtDNA mutations that is responsible for the pathogenesis of cancer remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate somatic mutations in the MT-CYB and D-Loop regions of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in oral cavity cancers from Senegalese patients.

Methods:

MT-CYB and the D-Loop of mtDNA derived from 45 oral cavity cancer tissues and 21 control blood samples were assessed by PCR and sequencing. The sequences of MT-CYB and the D-Loop from cancerous tissues were compared with control sequences, and sequence differences were recognized as somatic mutations.

Results:

Overall, 389 somatic mtDNA mutations were identified, most of which (79.43%) were located in the D-Loop region. The majority of base substitution mutations were G-to-A (63.93%) and T-to-C (16.39%) transitions. In the protein-coding MT-CYB gene, 29 missense mutations were observed. The pathogenic mutation load of MT-CYB was 3.11%. Pathogenic mutations were carried by 25% of patients. pArg76Pro (pArg282Pro in rCRS) was novel and was the most common pathogenic mutation observed.

Conclusion:

These results strongly indicate that mtDNA mutations are a potential marker of oral cavity cancer.

Key Words: Oral cavity cancers- MT-CYB- D-Loop- mtDNA

Introduction

Oral cancers are malignant neoplasms occurring in the structures or tissues of the mouth. They are potentially fatal and constitute a considerable proportion of tumors of the head and neck. Regardless of the fact that the oral cavity is a prime target for the accumulation of carcinogens, most oral cancers are frequently detected at an advanced stage, leading to a lower survival rate among subjects. Oral cancers are currently a major global health issue: they are reported to be the sixth most common cancer in the world, with an estimated 400,000 newly diagnosed cases and causing 223,000 deaths in 2008 (Wamakulasuriya, 2009; Chaturvedi et al., 2013).

The majority of human cancer types are characterized by genetic instabilities. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the only non-nuclear genetic component of the human genome (Stewart et al., 2008). Mitochondria are intracellular organelles responsible for ATP production via their oxidative phosphorylation system. It is widely accepted that mitochondria play an important role in the aging processes of both cells and individuals. Somatic mutations in mtDNA have been increasingly observed in human cancers and have been proposed as important oncological biomarkers (Jakupciak et al., 2005; Chatterjee et al., 2006). The biological significance of mtDNA mutations in cancer remains unclear (Chatterjee et al., 2006). Nevertheless, evidence is emerging that mtDNA damage has direct effects mediated by reactive oxygen species (Petros et al., 2005; Ishikawa et al., 2008).

In the present study, in order to examine the role of mtDNA mutation in oral cavity cancers, we analyzed the MT-CYB and D-Loop sequences of the mitochondrial genome in 45 oral cavity cancers. We employed a sophisticated visualization technique, rainbow boxes (Lamy et al., 2016; Lamy et al., 2017), for identifying patients that share mutations at the same location and potential co-occurring mutations. This technique was recently proposed and applied to biological data, for example for designing a new schema of amino acids (Lamy, 2018).

Materials and Methods

Tissue samples

Tumor tissue samples were derived from patients with oral cavity cancers. 45 patients treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Affiliated Hospital Aristide Le Dantec (Dakar, Senegal) were recruited for participation in this study. The study was approved by the University Cheikh Anta Diop Research Ethics committee (Reference: 0272/2018/CER/UCAD). The Helsinki Declaration has been read and approved. All cases were histologically confirmed and gave written informed consent for participation before surgery. As controls, peripheral blood samples (N=21) were collected from healthy individuals into EDTA-treated tubes.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Quick-DNATM Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

MT-CYB PCR

To determine the presence of mutations in the MT-CYB gene (encoding the cytochrome b protein), amplification of MT-CYB was performed in a 50-µl reaction using 2 µl of genomic DNA, 2.5 µl of each primer, 5 µl buffer 10×, 1 µl MgCl2, 2 µl dNTPs, 0.2 µl DNA polymerase, and 34.8 µl DNAse-free water. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 52°C for 1 min, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min 30 s; followed by extension at 72°C for 10 min and holding at 10°C. Primers H15915 (TCCCATTTCTGGTTTACAAGAC) and L14723 (ACCAATGACATGAAAAATCATGGTT) were used.

D-Loop PCR

Amplification of the D-Loop region from tissue and blood extracts was performed in a 50-µl reaction using 2 µl of genomic DNA, 2.5 µl of each primer, 5 µl buffer 10×, 1 µl MgCl2, 2 µl dNTPs, 0.1 µl DNA polymerase, and 34.9 µl DNAase-free water. The following program was used initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 62°C for 30 s, and elongation at 72°C for 2 min; followed by extension at 72°C for 10 min. Primers H408 (TGTTAAAAGTGCATACCGCCA) and L16340 (AGCCATTTACCGTACATAGCACA) were used.

DNA sequencing

All PCR products were purified and sequenced with an ABI Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit and an ABIPRISM 3730xl sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

Mutation visualization

Sequences obtained from control and cancerous tissues were aligned using BioEdit software version 7.1.9 (Hall, 1999). In our analysis, each sample could present several mutations, and a given mutation could occur in several samples. Under these conditions, it can be difficult to determine which mutations are shared across samples and to identify possible co-occurring mutations. We used a visualization method based on rainbow boxes (Lamy et al., 2016; Lamy et al., 2017), a recently developed visualization technique for overlapping data sets. Rainbow boxes can be used to visualize up to 100 elements and 250 sets; we applied this technique to the visualization of the set of mutations present in each sample. Here, we considered samples as the elements and mutation locations as the sets. All mutations occurring at the same location were grouped together, for the purpose of visualization, but distinguished by color. Colors corresponded to mutation types for gene sequences and to predicted pathogenicity for protein sequences.

In rainbow boxes, elements (i.e., samples) are presented as columns, and sets (i.e., mutation locations) as rectangular boxes. Each box covers the columns corresponding to the samples that have a mutation at a given location. Whenever the samples carrying a given mutation are not displayed in contiguous columns, a “hole” is present in the box, represented by a thin link that relates the various parts of the box. Samples are ordered in the visualization so as to minimize the number of holes using Artificial Feeding Birds (AFB), a metaheuristic inspired by the behavior of pigeons (Lamy, 2019). As a consequence, similar samples are placed next to each other.

Criteria for defining pathogenic mutations

The D-Loop and MT-CYB regions of mtDNA derived from control and tumor tissues were analyzed, and any DNA sequence differences were regarded as somatic mutations. For MT-CYB, we used the following four in-silico algorithms to predict the putative effect of each nonsynonymous mutation on the cytochrome b protein function: Polyphen-2 (Adzhubei et al., 2013), SIFT (Kumar et al., 2009), mutationAssessor (mutationassessor.org), and Provean (Choi et al., 2012). A mutation was considered pathogenic when at least three methods predicted a deleterious effect. Mutation load was calculated as the percentage of nucleotides altered, considering only coding nonsynonymous mtDNA mutations.

Results

Study population

Using PCR and DNA sequencing, we investigated the occurrence of somatic point mutations in both the MT-CYB and D-Loop regions of the mitochondrial genome in oral cavity cancers from 45 patients and 21 controls. Patient age ranged from 14 to 86. There were 17 male and 28 female patients. Patients were asked their smoking status and were classified according to their responses (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

Variable Case (N=45)
Sex
Male 17 (37.77%)
Female 28 (62.22%)
Age
Std+/- 16.64
Mean 53.3
Range 14-86
Smoking
Tobacco Smoking 4 (8.88%)
Smoking + Alcohol 9 (20%)
Tobacco + Indian hemp + alcohol 1 (2.22%)
Never 31 (68.88%)
Localization
Right 16 (37.20%)
Left 23 (53.48%)
Lower gum 1 (2.32%)
Mandibular gingiva 1 (2.32%)
Tongue 2 (4.65%)

Visualization of mutations using rainbow boxes

Figure 1 shows the mutations observed in MT-CYB and the D-Loop region and shared by oral cavity cancer tissues and controls, using rainbow boxes. Samples are shown in columns and grouped by health status (healthy control or oral cavity cancer patient). Samples are ordered by similarity, i.e. samples presenting similar mutations tend to be placed close to each other. Mutations are represented by rectangular boxes, with each box covering the columns of samples having the mutation. Boxes are organized vertically by sequence region (MT-CYB and D-Loop) and by mutation location. Different substitutions at the same location, e.g. C242T and C242A, are grouped together in the same box but represented with different colors. For mutations in the D-Loop, we used colors to indicate the mutated base. The color hue is determined by the original base in the reference sequence, using the usual colors (A: blue, T: yellow, C: red, G: green). Bright colors correspond to transversions, and pastel colors to transitions. The color key also gives the number of mutations observed for each type.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The Various Locations of the Mutations Observed in the Control and Oral Cavity Cancers Patients, Displayed as Rainbow Boxes

For mutations in MT-CYB, we used a grayscale gradient to represent the predicted pathogenicity of each mutation. Darker boxes correspond to more pathogenic mutations, according to four in-silico methods detailed in the Materials and Methods section. The exact location and details of the various mutations can be obtained in popup bubbles.

In Figure 1, we can see that most mutations occurred in the D-Loop, and many of these were G-to-A transitions. Three patients (labeled CB24, CB10, and CB20) had a very high number of mutations in the second half of the D-Loop, with a high proportion of transversions, compared with mutation patterns observed in other patients. In addition, one patient (CB31) had many transversions in MT-CYB.

Somatic mtDNA mutation spectrum of Senegalese oral cavity cancer patients

The sequencing results for the tumor samples were compared with those obtained from controls. The distributions of mtDNA haplotypes differed between control and cancerous tissues [MT-CYB (control h=7; cancerous h=20); D-Loop (control h=2; cancerous h=23)]. The term “haplotype” can also refer to the inheritance of a cluster of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are variations at single positions in the DNA sequence among individuals. Overall, 39 of the tumor tissues (88.63%) had one or more somatic mtDNA mutations (11.4% had one mutation, 0% tissues had two mutations, and 59.1% had at least three mutations). Twelve (27.3%) patients had mutations in MT-CYB only, 18 (40.9%) had mutations in the D-Loop only, and 9 (20.5%) had mutations in both MT-CYB and the D-Loop. In total, 79.43% (309/389) of the somatic mutations in oral cavity cancer cases occurred in the D-Loop region of the mitochondrial genome, whereas 20.56% (80/389) occurred in the MT-CYB gene. In the D-Loop region, many more cancer patients than controls carried multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (Figure 1). Frequent mutations were reported in oral cavity cancers at positions G229A (8 patients), G232A (10 patients), G245A (10 patients), G275A (10 patients), G277A (15 patients), G281A (15 patients), G641A (7 patients), G477A (14 patients), and T606C (16 patients). The relative mutation frequency (mutations/nucleotides) for the D-Loop was 2.99-fold higher than that for MT-CYB (309/662 versus 80/513). The most frequent mutation types were base substitutions: G-to-A (149) or C-to-T (25) transition mutations (73.10%, 174/238), followed by A-to-G (21) and T-to-C (43) transitions.

Predicted pathogenicity of missense mutations

Mutations in MT-CYB were identified in 27.3% of oral cavity cancer tissues, with 29 missense mutations reported (Table 2). Among the mutations found, 16 (55.17%), including p.Ala53Asp, p.Ala53Ser, p.Asn54Ser, p.Thr58Ile, p.Pro60Thr, p.His61Pro, p.Pro64Arg, p.Glu65Gly, p.Glu65Asp, p.Trp66Leu, p.Leu69Val, p.Phe70Leu, p.Phe70Val, p.Arg76Ala, p.Arg76Pro, and p.Leu86His, were considered pathogenic. These amino acid changes were induced by 32 mutations, including 9 (28.12%) transitions and 23 (71.87%) transversions. The most common pathogenic mutation (7 patients) was an arginine to proline substitution at position 76 (p.Arg76Pro). This mutation is novel and has not been previously reported in the database MITOMAP (www.mitomap.org). The effect of somatic mtDNA mutations in MT-CYB was evaluated in terms of the mutation load. The pathogenic mutation load was 3.11% (16/513), and pathogenic mutations were carried by 11 (25%) patients.

Table 2.

Functional Impact of Amino Acid Substitutions in Cytochrome b Protein Identified in Patients with Oral Cavity Cancer

Mutation rRCS position Functional impact
Codon changes Patients
MutationAssessor Polyphen-2 SIFT Provean
p.Leu52Pro L258P neut pod - neut CTA→CCA CB2, CB11, CB17, CB25, CB27, CB41
p.Leu52Gln L258Q neut benign - neut CTA→CAA CB35
p.Leu52Arg L258R neut benign apf neut CTA→CGA CB21
p.Ala53Asp A259D high pd - del GCC→GAC CB22
p.Ala53Ser A259S high pd apf del GCC→TCC CB39
p.Asn54Ser N260S med pd apf del AAC→AGC CB22, CB35
p.Asn57His N263H low pod - neut AAC→CAC CB31
p.Asn57Thr N263T neut benign tol neut AAC→ACC CB38
p.Thr58Ile T264I high pd apf del ACC→ATC CB31
p.Pro60Thr P266T low pd apf del CCC→ACC CB31
p.His61Pro H267P high pd apf del CAC→CCC CB31
p.Pro64Arg P270R high pd apf del CCC→CGC CB39
p.Glu65Gly E271G high pd - del GAA→GGA CB27
p.Glu65Asp E271D high pd apf neut GAA→GAT CB24, CB31
p.Trp66Leu W272L high pd apf del TGA→TTA CB31
p.Leu69Val L275V high pd apf del CTA→GTA CB31
p.Phe70Leu F276L med pd apf del TTC→CTT CB31
p.Phe70Trp F276W - pd - del TTC→TGG CB
p.Phe70Val F276V high pd - del TTC→GTC CB27
p.Phe73Ser T279S neut benign apf neut ACA→TCA CB31
p.Arg76Ala R282A - pd apf del CGA→GCA CB39
p.Arg76Pro R282P high pd - del CGA→GCA CB21, CB32, CB33, CB34, CB36, CB37, CB44
p.Val78Leu V284L med benign apf neut GTC→CTC CB31
p.Leu82Met L288M - pd apf neut CTA→ATA CB27
p.Leu86His L292H high pd apf del CTT→CAT CB27
p.Ser117Leu S323L neut benign tol neut TCA→TTA CB22
p.Leu118F L324F low pod apf del CTT→TTT CB7
p.Thr162Ile T368I neut benign tol neut ACT→ATT CB21, CB42, CB43, CB45
p.Ile163Val I369V neu benign Tol neut ATC→GTC CB12

Pathogenic mutations are shown in bold; pathogenic mutations not previously described in mitomap database (www.mitomap.org) are shown in bold and italic; neut: neutral; tol, tolerable; pd, probably damaging; del, deleterious; pod, possibly damaging; apf, affect protein function; med, medium; ben, benign

Discussion

In this study, we present for the first time a comprehensive mutation screen of selected regions of the mitochondrial genome in oral cavity cancers in Senegalese patients. Among the oral cavity tumor tissues, 88.63% carried mitochondrial mutations. The frequency of mutation was much higher in the non-coding D-Loop region (79.43%) than in MT-CYB (20.56%), with a relative mutation frequency 2.99-fold higher than that in MT-CYB. Other studies report a 7-fold increase in susceptibility (Zhu et al., 2005). The D-Loop region of mtDNA is crucial for replication and expression of the mitochondrial genome, as it contains essential transcriptional promoters and the leading-strand origin of replication. In contrast to the findings of the present study, a study by Lin et al., (2015) involving direct sequencing reported somatic mutations in the D-Loop in 62.5% of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Tan et al., (2004), in their study of betel quid-related oral cancer patients, observed somatic mutations in the D-Loop region in 66.7% (12/18) of samples (Tan et al., 2004). A recent study on oral squamous cell carcinoma also found a high rate of somatic mutations in the D-Loop region, with mutations in 85% (203/240) of patients (Lai et al., 2013). The high somatic mutation rates observed in the aforementioned studies are comparable with the rate found in our study.

Oral cavity cancers in Senegalese patients revealed high intratumoral heterogeneity. Twelve patients who had mutations in MT-CYB did not have mutations in the D-LoopMT-CYB mutations do not appear to be associated with those of the D-Loop. Cells in the same tumor are therefore not identical. This intratumoral heterogeneity can be a limiting factor in determining appropriate treatment. For example, it is unclear which of the two mitochondrial regions (MT-CYB or the D-Loop) is associated with tumorigenesis, including changes in the cell cycle, apoptosis, and differentiation. It is also unknown which of the mutations in the two regions are responsible for disease dissemination.

The distribution of mutation types may provide some insight into the mechanisms that cause these mutations. The majority of the base substitution mutations were either G-to-A (149) or C-to-T (25) transitions, a spectrum characteristic of oxidative DNA damage (Chatterjee et al., 2006). To investigate the possibility that MT-CYB and D-Loop mitochondrial sequences may be associated with cancer development, we assessed the relative frequency of mutation in each region.

Human mtDNA sequences are highly variable. It is therefore necessary to define functionally important somatic mutations that may be deleterious or pathogenic in terms of tumor progression. A key step in the process of annotating sequencing results is the integration of pathogenicity predictions. This encompasses the use of various tools that aim to predict the effects of substitutions on the structure and/or function of proteins. Several tools are available and use different approaches. Although these methods are useful in practice, their accuracy remains a concern. Therefore, we applied a battery of four tools to determine the pathogenicity of mutations, as described in the Materials and Methods section, and we found that 11 (25%) oral cavity cancers carried nonsynonymous pathogenic mutations. This is similar to the results of another study showing that 23.6% of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma cases derived from a Taiwanese population carried pathogenic mutations in mtDNA sequences (Lai et al., 2013). The cytochrome b protein plays a key role in mitochondria, which convert the energy from food into a form that cells can use. Mutations in the MT-CYB gene can cause mitochondrial complex III deficiency.

Many cancer studies completely ignore synonymous mutations (Sankin et al., 2014), whereas others use them to build neutral background models of mutation clustering for the detection of activating mutations (Tamberero et al., 2013). Apart from their silent effect on the encoded protein, the disregard for such DNA modifications may be rooted in the assumption that synonymous sites are not subject to selection (Kimura, 1977). However, there are many examples of synonymous mutations that have been implicated in various human diseases, including heritable conditions (Sauna and Kimchi Sarfaty, 2011), suggesting parallel functional effects in cancers. Awareness that somatic synonymous mutations may include causal variants, i.e. driver mutations, is beginning to take hold. In this study, the mutations in the gene encoding cytochrome b follow the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Most mutations are selectively neutral and would have occurred at random. The MT-CYB mutations are somatic, and the majority are synonymous substitutions.

We used a new method for visualizing mutations shared by patients, based on rainbow boxes. This is the first application of rainbow boxes in this context. This type of visualization was found to be useful for searching for mutation co-occurrence and could be used on many other datasets.

The discovery of cancer-specific mitochondrial DNA mutations has escalated within recent years. Our findings may provide further evidence for the theory that most oral cavity tumors contain mitochondrial mutations. Future studies should aim to establish the actual causes of intratumoral heterogeneity and the correlation between oral cavity cancers and risk factors (e.g. sex, age, and smoking status).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Affiliated Hospital Aristide Le Dantec for the availability of the samples. The study was approved by the University Cheikh Anta Diop Research Ethics committee (Reference: 0272/2018/CER/UCAD). The Helsinki Declaration has been read and approved. This study was funded by the Population Genetics and Management Team of the Department of Animal Biology of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar.

References

  1. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using polyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2013;7:Unit 7. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chatterjee A, Mambo E, Sidransky D. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:4663–74. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaturvedi AK, Andersonn WF, Lartet-Tieulent J, et al. Worldwide trends in incidence rates for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4550–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;44:211–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ishikawa K, Takenaga K, Akimoto M, et al. ROS-generating mitochondrial DNA mutations can regulate tumor cell metastasis. Science. 2008;320:661–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1156906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jakupciak JP, Wang W, Markowitz ME, et al. Mitochondrial DNA as a cancer biomarker. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7:258–67. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60553-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Nature. 1977;267:275–6. doi: 10.1038/267275a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1073–81. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lai CH, Huang SF, Liao CT, et al. Clinical significance in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma of pathogenic somatic mitochondrial mutations. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lamy JB, Berthelot H, Favre M. Rainbow boxes: a technique for visualizing overlapping sets and an application to the comparison of drugs properties. International Conference on Information Visualisation (iV) 2016: 253–60. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lamy JB, Berthelot H, Capron C, Favre M. Rainbow boxes: a new technique for overlapping set visualization and two applications in the biomedical domain. J Visual Lang Comput. 2017;43:71–82. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lamy JB. A new diagram for amino acids: User study comparing rainbow boxes to Venn/Euler diagram. International Conference on Information Visualisation (iV) 2018 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lamy JB. Artificial Feeding Birds (AFB): a new metaheuristic inspired by the behavior of pigeons. In: Shandilya SK, Shandilya S, Nagar AK, editors. Advances in nature-inspired computing and applications. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lin JC, Wang CC, Jiang RS, Wang WY, Liu SA. Impact of somatic mutations in the D-Loop of mitochondrial DNA on the survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Petros JA, Baumann AK, Ruiz-Pesini E, et al. mtDNA mutations increase tumorigenicity in prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:719–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408894102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sankin A, Hakimi AA, Mikkilineni N, et al. The impact of genetic heterogeneity on biomaker development in Kidney cancer assessed by multiregional sampling. Cancer Med. 2014;3:1485–92. doi: 10.1002/cam4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C. Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:683–91. doi: 10.1038/nrg3051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stewart JB, Freyer C, Elson JL, Larsson NG. Purifying selection of mtDNA and its implications for understanding evolution and mitochondrial disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:657–62. doi: 10.1038/nrg2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tamberero D, Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N. Oncodrive Clust: exploiting the positional clustering of somatic mutations to identify cancer genes. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2238–44. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan DJ, Chang J, Chen WL, et al. Somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in oral cancer of betel quid chewers. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1011:310–16. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-41088-2_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wamakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:309–16. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhu W, Qin W, Bradley P, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in breast cancer tissue and in matched nipple aspirate fluid. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:145–52. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES