Abstract
The impressive selectivity and efficacy of BH3 mimetics for treating cancer has largely been limited to BCL-2 dependent hematological malignancies. Most solid tumors depend on other anti-apoptotic proteins, including MCL-1, for survival. The recent description of S63845 as the first specific and potent MCL-1 inhibitor represents an important therapeutic advance, since MCL-1 is not targeted by the currently available BH3 mimetics, Navitoclax or Venetoclax, and is commonly associated with chemoresistance. In this study, we confirm a high binding affinity and selectivity of S63845 to induce apoptosis in MCL-1-dependent cancer cell lines. Furthermore, S63845 synergizes with other BH3 mimetics to induce apoptosis in cell lines derived from both hematological and solid tumors. Although the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members in these cell lines interact with a spectrum of pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins to regulate apoptosis, these interactions alone do not explain the relative sensitivities of these cell lines to BH3 mimetic-induced apoptosis. These findings necessitated further investigation into the requirement of BH3-only proteins in BH3 mimetic-mediated apoptosis. Concurrent inhibition of BCL-XL and MCL-1 by BH3 mimetics in colorectal HCT116 cells induced apoptosis in a BAX- but not BAK-dependent manner. Remarkably this apoptosis was independent of all known BH3-only proteins. Although BH3-only proteins were required for apoptosis induced as a result of BCL-XL inhibition, this requirement was overcome when both BCL-XL and MCL-1 were inhibited, implicating distinct mechanisms by which different anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members may regulate apoptosis in cancer.
Subject terms: Cancer, Biochemistry
Introduction
Abnormal cell survival through resistance to apoptosis is a cardinal feature of most malignancies and plays a key role in chemoresistance. [1, 2] As the major regulators of the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis, the pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins (BCL-2, BCL-XL, MCL-1, and BCL2A1) are attractive targets for novel cancer therapeutics. [3, 4] These proteins are proposed to function by binding and sequestering the pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins, which in turn prevents the effector proteins, BAX and BAK, from forming pores in the mitochondrial membrane. The development of inhibitors of the pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins has proven particularly difficult because their inhibition requires disruption of these protein-protein interactions. However, after many years of research, small molecule inhibitors known as BH3 mimetics, which target the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family have now been developed. The first clinically approved BH3 mimetic was ABT-263 (Navitoclax), an orally available form of ABT-737, which inhibits BCL-2, BCL-XL, and BCL-w [3, 5–7] and potently induces apoptosis in several solid and hematological cancers. This was followed by the introduction of a BCL-2-specific inhibitor, ABT-199 (Venetoclax), which has received approval for treating refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where BCL-2 addiction is a key feature in the pathogenesis of the disease. [8–10] Recently, BH3 mimetics specifically targeting BCL-XL (A-1331852) [11–15] and MCL-1 (A-1210477 and S63845) [1, 12, 16] have also been developed.
In this study, we demonstrate that S63845 is a highly potent and selective MCL-1 inhibitor, which can synergize with other BH3 mimetics, including ABT-199 and A-1331852, to induce apoptosis in a wide range of cell lines derived from different hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that BH3-only proteins are required for apoptosis induced following BCL-XL inhibition, whereas dual inhibition of BCL-XL and MCL-1 resulted in a BH3-only protein-independent cell death.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Cell lines derived from mantle cell lymphoma (MAVER-1), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (U-2946), chronic myeloid leukemia (K562), acute myeloid leukemia (MOLM-13, OCI-AML-3, HL-60, MV-4-11, THP-1 and U-937), Jurkat-T-lymphocyte cell lines, wild-type and deficient in caspase-9 (from Prof. J. Borst, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam), caspase-8 and FADD (from Prof. J. Blenis, Weill Cornell Medicine, USA), non-small cell lung carcinoma (H1299), prostate cancer (PC-3, from Prof. Y. Ke, University of Liverpool, UK) and triple negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231 from P. Meier, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium. H929, a multiple myeloma cell line, was cultured in the same medium supplemented with 0.02% 2-mercaptoethanol. The non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line A549 was cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 1% non-essential amino acids. The pancreatic cancer cell line, SUIT-2 (from A. Mielgo, University of Liverpool, UK) was cultured in DMEM. Colon cancer cell lines HT-29 (from J. Parsons, University of Liverpool, UK) and HCT116 (wild-type, DKO and 8KO) [3, 17–22] as well as HCT116 cells deficient in BAX or BAK (from R. J. Youle, National Institute of Health, USA), were cultured in McCoys 5 A Modified media. All cell lines, unless otherwise specified, were either from DMSZ (Braunshweig, Germany) or ATCC (Middlesex, UK) and were validated using short tandem repeat profiling. Peripheral blood samples from CLL patients were obtained with patient consent and local ethics committee approval and cultured as described. [23] All media were supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies Inc., Paisley, UK).
Reagents
A-1331852 and A-1210477 from AbbVie Inc. (North Chicago, IL, USA), S63845 from ActiveBiochem (New Jersey, USA), and ABT-199 and Z-VAD.FMK from Selleck Chemicals Co. (Houston, TX, USA) were used. Antibodies against BCL-XL, BIM and BAD from Cell Signalling Technology (MA, USA), NOXA from Millipore (Watford, UK), BID and tubulin from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), MCL-1, BCL-2 and PUMA from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and BAX and cytochrome c (BD BioSciences, California) were used for immunoblotting. Antibodies used for immunoprecipitation were MCL-1 (Y-37) and BCL-XL from Abcam, BCL-2 from BD Biosciences and BAX (NT) from Merck-Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA). siRNAs specific to BCL-XL (SI03025141), MCL-1 (SI02781205) and a non-targeting control (1027310) from Qiagen (Cambridge, UK) were incubated with Interferin siRNA transfection reagent (Polyplus transfection Inc., NY, USA) and added to cells at a concentration of 10 nM for 72 h.
Differential scanning fluorimetry assay
Thermal shift assays were performed using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR machine (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) with Spyro-Orange dye (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and purified recombinant BCL-2 (Abcam) and MCL-1 protein, as previously described. [3]
Cytochrome c release, BAX translocation and apoptosis measurements
To quantitate cytochrome c release and BAX translocation, cells were grown on coverslips and treated with the specified inhibitors following a 0.5 h pre-treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD.FMK (30 μM), and then fixed with 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS, followed by incubation with primary and fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies prior to visualization under a fluorescent microscope. The extent of cytochrome c released from the mitochondria or BAX translocation to the mitochondria was quantified by counting at least 300 cells from three independent experiments. The extent of apoptosis in cells following different treatments was quantified using an Attune NxT flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK), as previously described. [24]
Gel filtration, immunoprecipitation and Western blotting
Recombinant MCL-1 purification, size exclusion chromatography and immunoprecipitation experiments were carried out as previously described. [3, 25] Western blotting was carried out according to standard protocols. Briefly, 50 μg of total protein lysate was subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Subsequently proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and protein bands visualized with ECL reagents (GE Healthcare).
Clonogenic studies
Cells were seeded in 6 well plates at a density of 2000 cells/well and exposed to the specified inhibitors (100 nM) 24 h post-seeding. Cells were fixed on day 7 using methanol and acetic acid and then stained with crystal violet and colonies counted using the GelCount tumor colony counter (Oxford Optronix, Abbingdon, UK).
Statistics
For time-course studies, a two-way ANOVA was performed using Dunnet’s multiple comparisons analysis and other studies were analyzed for statistical significance with one-way ANOVA using Sidak’s multiple comparisons analysis. The asterisks depicted correspond to the following p values: *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001.
Results
S63845 is a potent MCL-1 inhibitor and weak inducer of apoptosis in BCL-2- but not BCL-XL-dependent cells
Consistent with previous findings, [1] we demonstrated that S63845 is a potent MCL-1 inhibitor when compared with A-1210477, as assessed by a concentration-dependent thermal stabilization of MCL-1 in our in vitro thermal shift assay [3] (Fig. 1a). S63845 also induced rapid apoptosis in two MCL-1-dependent cell lines (H929 and U-2946), [3, 6] with an IC50~100 nM, demonstrating ~100-fold higher potency than A-1210477 (Fig. 1b). To assess the specificity of S63845 to induce apoptosis in a MCL-1 dependent manner, we exposed K562 cells (a BCL-XL-dependent cell line) and MAVER-1 cells (a BCL-2-dependent cell line) to increasing concentrations of S63845 (Fig. 1c, d). As expected, S63845 (as well as A-1210477) failed to induce apoptosis in K562 cells, whereas extensive apoptosis was observed following exposure to A-1331852 (Fig. 1c). However, S63845 (as well as A-1210477) induced a concentration dependent increase in apoptosis in MAVER-1 cells, albeit at higher concentrations than ABT-199 (Fig. 1d), suggesting that S63845 could either induce death in a non-specific manner or that it could also be a weak inhibitor of BCL-2. To test this, we exposed Jurkat cells (wild type as well as deficient in FADD, caspase-8 and caspase-9) to increasing concentrations of S63845. While S63845 induced similar levels of apoptosis in wild type as well as FADD/ caspase-8 deficient Jurkat cells, cells deficient in caspase-9 were completely resistant to S63845-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 1e), thus demonstrating that S63845 both specifically induced the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis and also did not induce non-specific cell death. To identify whether S63845, in addition to binding and inhibiting MCL-1, can also potentially bind and inhibit BCL-2, we exposed primary CLL cells that exclusively depend on BCL-2 for survival, [8] to increasing concentrations of S63845 and A-1210477. While ABT-199 (positive control) induced apoptosis in these cells at low nanomolar concentrations, both S63845 and A-1210477 also induced significant apoptosis at concentrations similar to their IC50 values in MCL-1 dependent cells (Fig. 1f). However, we did not detect any concentration-dependent thermal stabilization of BCL-2 following S63845 in an in vitro thermal shift assay, which was in marked contrast to the thermal stabilization of BCL-2 following ABT-199 in this assay (Fig. 1g). Taken together, our data demonstrates that under these experimental conditions, S63845 does not bind BCL-2 and induces apoptosis in a MCL-1-specific manner.
S63845 is more potent than ABT-199 in inducing apoptosis in AML cell lines
Recent reports indicate that cells derived from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients can be effectively targeted with a BCL-2 and/or MCL-1 inhibitor, [11, 13–15] although other studies suggest that these cells depend primarily on BCL-2 for survival. [16] Indeed, MCL-1 inhibitors are currently entering clinical trials to treat AML and multiple myeloma patients (Clinical trials—NCT02979366; NCT02675452; NCT02992483). Therefore, we investigated whether S63845 alone or in combination with ABT-199 could induce apoptosis in a panel of AML cell lines. Of the six cell lines tested, MV-4-11 cells exhibited high sensitivity to both S63845 (IC50~20 nM) and ABT-199 (IC50 ~ 50-100 nM) individually. THP-1 was much more resistant to ABT-199 but sensitive to S63845 (IC50~50 nM). OCI-AML-3, U937 and MOLM-13 were completely resistant to ABT-199 but somewhat sensitive to S63845 at higher concentrations. In contrast, HL-60 cells were largely resistant to both BH3 mimetics individually (Fig. 2a). In the resistant cell lines, particularly U-937 and HL-60, BCL-2 and BCL-XL appeared to perform redundant functions in cell survival, whereas MOLM-13 cells appeared to depend on BCL-XL for survival, as exposure to A-1331852 alone resulted in significant apoptosis (Supplemental Fig. S1). Nevertheless, all AML cells examined were more sensitive to the combination of S63845 and ABT-199 (Fig. 2a).
Interactions between the pro and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members do not reflect the relative sensitivities of AML cell lines to undergo BH3 mimetic-mediated apoptosis
BH3 mimetic-induced apoptosis is usually attributed to displacement of BH3-only proteins from their anti-apoptotic partners, leading to apoptosis. Since the different AML cell lines exhibited varied responses to BH3 mimetic-mediated apoptosis, we wished to assess if this could be attributed to altered binding and/or displacement of the different BH3-only proteins to their known survival counterparts. Therefore, we immunoprecipitated the anti-apoptotic proteins required for survival and probed for each of the BH3-only proteins (Fig. 2b–d). In MV-4-11 cells, which are sensitive to both ABT-199 and S63845, BIM and PUMA bound to BCL-2 and were slightly displaced following exposure to ABT-199 (Fig. 2b). In contrast, the traces of BIM and NOXA bound to MCL-1 in these cells were readily displaced after S63845 exposure, in-line with the extent of apoptosis observed with S63845 (IC50~20 nM). Neither BID nor BAD interacted with MCL-1 or BCL-2 in these cells (Fig. 2b). In OCI-AML-3, exposure to ABT-199 also resulted in a partial displacement of BIM and PUMA from BCL-2, despite the cells being largely resistant to ABT-199 (Fig. 2c). Similar to MV-4-11, BIM and NOXA bound to MCL-1 were readily displaced with S63845, and BID and BAD failed to interact with either MCL-1 or BCL-2 (Fig. 2c). In the resistant HL-60 cell line, BIM and PUMA bound to BCL-2 was not displaced following ABT-199, compatible with the cells being largely resistant to ABT-199 (Fig. 2d). BID and BAD were not bound to either MCL-1 or BCL-2. Moreover, of all the BH3-only members, only traces of NOXA appeared to interact with MCL-1 and was displaced following S63845 (Fig. 2d). Taken together, these results suggest that interactions between the pro- and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members may not necessarily reflect the relative sensitivities of different AML cell lines to undergo BH3 mimetic-mediated apoptosis.
Interactions of BCL-XL and MCL-1 with different BH3-only members differ in solid tumor cell lines
Unlike several hematological malignancies, cancer cells derived from most solid tumors depend on both BCL-XL and MCL-1 for survival. [3, 17, 19–22] Exposure of cells derived from a panel of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung carcinoma (H1299 and A549), pancreas (SUIT-2), colon (HCT116 and HT-29) and prostate cancer (PC-3) to a combination of S63845 or A-1331852 resulted in a marked induction of apoptosis, confirming that these cell lines depend on both BCL-XL and MCL-1 for survival (Fig. 3a). To corroborate earlier findings in AML cell lines (Fig. 2) in non-hematological cells, we repeated immunoprecipitation studies and assessed interactions between the different BH3-only proteins with their key pro-survival counterparts, namely BCL-XL and MCL-1. In H1299 cells, BIM and PUMA were preferentially bound to MCL-1 and BCL-XL, respectively, and were readily displaced following exposure to the relevant BH3 mimetics (Fig. 3b). This was particularly evident following exposure to S63845, in which the newly released BIM from the MCL-1 complex exhibited enhanced binding to BCL-XL. Similarly, exposure to A-1331852 displaced BIM from BCL-XL, which in turn facilitated its binding to MCL-1 (Fig. 3b). Other BH3-only proteins like NOXA and BAD exhibited selectivity in binding to MCL-1 and BCL-XL, respectively and were also displaced after exposure to the relevant BH3 mimetics. No detectable binding of BID to either BCL-XL or MCL-1 was observed (Fig. 3b). In SUIT-2 cells, BIM was bound to both MCL-1 and BCL-XL and was displaced to differing extents with the specific BH3 mimetics (Fig. 3c). In contrast to H1299, PUMA was not bound to either MCL-1 or BCL-XL (Fig. 3c). However, there were some similarities, especially with NOXA being bound to MCL-1 and displaced with S63845, and BAD bound to BCL-XL, which could be disrupted following A-1331852 (Fig. 3c). Therefore, H1299 and SUIT-2 cells exhibit significant differences in their BCL-2 family interaction profile, despite similar expression levels of the different proteins and cell death responsiveness to the combination of A-1331852 and S63845. This was even more evident in HCT116 cells, in which most of the BH3-only proteins, with the exception of NOXA, interacted exclusively with BCL-XL, and could be readily displaced from their binding partners with A-1331852 (Fig. 3d). Collectively, these results suggest that the preferential sequestration of different BH3-only proteins to distinct anti-apoptotic counterparts does not solely dictate dependency of a cell line on an individual anti-apoptotic protein.
BH3-only proteins are dispensable for BH3 mimetic-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells
Since BH3-only proteins have recently been demonstrated to be dispensable for cell death, [18, 26] we evaluated whether selective inhibitors of BCL-XL and MCL-1 could induce apoptosis in the absence of all known BH3-only proteins. Remarkably, in HCT116 8KO cells, which lack the 8 key BH3-only proteins, BIM, BID, PUMA, NOXA, HRK, BMF, BIK and BAD, [18] a combination of S63845 and A-1331852 induced apoptosis to the same extent as that of wild-type (WT) HCT116 cells (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, this combination of BH3 mimetics resulted in a BAX-dependent but BAK-independent apoptosis in these cells (Fig. 4b), emphasizing a crucial role for BAX in BH3 mimetic-mediated apoptosis. This raised the possibility of BAX directly interacting with BCL-XL and/or MCL-1 to antagonize apoptosis. To test this hypothesis, we immunoprecipitated MCL-1 and BCL-XL complexes from both HCT116 WT and 8KO cells but failed to detect BAX interaction with either anti-apoptotic protein (Fig. 4c). As a positive control, we immunoprecipitated active-BAX in these lysates, which pulled down BAX only following treatment with a combination of S63845 and A-1331852, indicative of BAX activation during apoptosis (Fig. 4c). These findings suggested that the BH3 mimetics could have displaced other protein(s) distinct from the 8 BH3-only proteins from BCL-XL and/or MCL-1, which in turn activated BAX to facilitate mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and apoptosis. Apoptosis induction in the 8KO cells was accompanied by translocation of BAX from the cytosol to the mitochondrial membrane (Fig. 4d), BAX oligomerization into high molecular mass complexes as assessed by gel filtration (Fig. 4e), and MOMP, measured by the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c (Fig. 4f). Together, this negates a role for BH3-only proteins in several critical steps of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway induced by BH3 mimetics.
Inhibition of BCL-XL and MCL-1 results in BH3-independent apoptosis
Although many cell lines derived from solid tumors depend on both BCL-XL and MCL-1 for survival, our studies revealed that inhibition of BCL-XL following exposure to A-1331852 was sufficient to induce significant apoptosis in a panel of cell lines (Fig. 5a). To assess whether A-1331852-mediated apoptosis also occurred in the absence of all known BH3-only proteins, we employed HCT116 WT and 8KO cells to assess several hallmarks of apoptosis following BCL-XL inhibition. Strikingly, exposure to A-1331852, but not S63845, resulted in enhanced apoptosis, as assessed by phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization, MOMP and mitochondrial translocation of BAX in HCT116 WT but not 8KO cells (Fig. 5b–d) suggesting that A-1331852-mediated apoptosis requires the presence of BH3-only proteins. Support for this suggestion was also provided by the enhanced apoptosis observed in WT, but not 8KO, cells following siRNA knockdown of BCL-XL (Fig. 5e). However, this protective effect in 8KO cells was abolished when both BCL-XL and MCL-1 were downregulated, suggesting a requirement of BH3-only proteins in BCL-XL but not when both BCL-XL and MCL-1 were downregulated. Similarly, exposure to A-1331852 significantly reduced the surviving fraction of WT, but not 8KO, cell populations (Fig. 5f). As expected, S63845 had no effect on clonogenic survival in either of the cell types, while a combination of the two BH3 mimetics obliterated clonogenicity in both cell types (Fig. 5f). Taken together, our data convincingly argue against the requirement of BH3-only proteins in apoptosis regulated by a combination of both BCL-XL and MCL-1 (Fig. 6).
Discussion
Prior to the discovery of S63845, putative MCL-1 inhibitors were poorly suited for clinical evaluation because they either lacked potency (high micromolar concentrations were required to inhibit MCL-1) or specificity resulting in undesirable toxicity. [3, 24, 27, 28] However, the development of S63845 potentially strengthens the use of a wide variety of BH3 mimetics in cancer therapy. In our hands, S63845 bound MCL-1 more extensively than A-1210477 and resulted in marked apoptosis in MCL-1-dependent cell lines (Fig. 1), and synergized with ABT-199 and A-1331852 to induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines (Figs. 2 and 3), supporting the concept that a potent MCL-1 inhibitor, such as S63845, could be a valuable addition to the BH3 mimetic armamentarium.
Our finding that BH3-only proteins are dispensable for BH3 mimetic-mediated apoptosis in HCT116 cells is striking, particularly when the proposed mechanism of action of BH3 mimetics is taken into consideration (Fig. 4). Since apoptosis induction in these cells still required BAX and not BAK, [29] it is possible that BH3 mimetics could indirectly activate BAX by disrupting the interaction of BAX with BCL-XL and/or MCL-1. However, we could not detect any BAX interaction with either of these anti-apoptotic proteins, despite efficient mitochondrial translocation and oligomerization of BAX, which resulted in MOMP and PS externalization (Fig. 4). Failure to detect BAX in complex with anti-apoptotic proteins could possibly be due to the dynamic nature of this interaction. Although BAX is generally considered to translocate from the cytosol to the outer mitochondrial membrane following apoptotic stimuli, several reports suggest a role for the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members in the constitutive retrotranslocation of BAX from the mitochondrial outer membrane to the cytosol even under non-apoptotic conditions. [30–35] Neutralization of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members with BH3 mimetics could markedly reduce BAX retrotranslocation to the cytosol, [33, 36] thus retaining it in the outer mitochondrial membrane, which may facilitate direct activation of BAX (Fig. 6). [18] This could explain the apoptosis observed following BH3 mimetics in HCT116 cells, even in the absence of all known BH3-only proteins (Fig. 4).
Our data reveal that the requirement for BH3-only proteins in BCL-XL-regulated apoptosis can clearly be overcome when both MCL-1 and BCL-XL are inhibited simultaneously (Figs. 4 and 5). Recent reports have demonstrated novel interacting partners of MCL-1, such as the BH3 domain-containing SUFU [37] and VLCAD, [38] which regulate distinct cellular functions. Therefore, other BH3-domain containing proteins distinct from the 8 key BH3-only members could interact with MCL-1 and/or BCL-XL and play a role in these events (Fig. 6). In summary, our results demonstrate that BH3 mimetics induce apoptosis even in the absence of the eight best characterized BH3-only proteins, while also identifying differences in the regulation of cell survival by the different anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members.. This highlights the need to understand the fundamental mechanisms of apoptosis in order to improve therapeutic approaches using BH3 mimetics.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank AbbVie for providing A-1331852 and A-1210477. We thank Drs. Youle, Meier, Mielgo, Blenis and Borst for the different cells used in this study. This work was supported by North West Cancer Research Grants CR1040 and CR1127 (to SV and GMC), Science Without Borders, CNPq 233624/2014-7, Ministry of Education, Brazil (to MM) and NIH Grants R03CA205496 and R01GM118437 (to XL).
Funding
This work was supported by North West Cancer Research Grant CR1040, CR1127 (to SV and GMC), Science Without Borders, CNPq 233624/2014-7, Ministry of Education, Brazil (to MM) and NIH Grants R03CA205496 and R01GM118437 (to XL).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by D. Vaux
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41418-018-0183-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Kotschy A, Szlavik Z, Murray J, Davidson J, Maragno AL, Le Toumelin-Braizat G, et al. The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models. Nature. 2016;538:477–82. doi: 10.1038/nature19830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Milani M, Byrne DP, Greaves G, Butterworth M, Cohen GM, Eyers PA, et al. DRP-1 is required for BH3 mimetic-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation and apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2552. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Youle RJ, Strasser A. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:47–59. doi: 10.1038/nrm2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oltersdorf T, Elmore SW, Shoemaker AR, Armstrong RC, Augeri DJ, Belli BA, et al. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Nature. 2005;435:677–81. doi: 10.1038/nature03579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Quentmeier H, Drexler HG, Hauer V, MacLeod RAF, Pommerenke C, Uphoff CC, et al. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma cell line U-2946: model for MCL1 inhibitor testing. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tse C, Shoemaker AR, Adickes J, Anderson MG, Chen J, Jin S, et al. ABT-263: a potent and orally bioavailable Bcl-2 family inhibitor. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3421–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Del Gaizo Moore V, Brown JR, Certo M, Love TM, Novina CD, Letai A. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:112–21. doi: 10.1172/JCI28281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Souers AJ, Leverson JD, Boghaert ER, Ackler SL, Catron ND, Chen J, et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat Med. 2013;19:202–8. doi: 10.1038/nm.3048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, Kahl BS, Puvvada SD, Gerecitano JF, et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;374:311–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luedtke DA, Niu X, Pan Y, Zhao J, Liu S, Edwards H, et al. Inhibition of Mcl-1 enhances cell death induced by the Bcl-2-selective inhibitor ABT-199 in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2:17012. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leverson JD, Zhang H, Chen J, Tahir SK, Phillips DC, Xue J, et al. Potent and selective small-molecule MCL-1 inhibitors demonstrate on-target cancer cell killing activity as single agents and in combination with ABT-263 (navitoclax) Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1590. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lin KH, Winter PS, Xie A, Roth C, Martz CA, Stein EM, et al. Targeting MCL-1/BCL-XL forestalls the acquisition of resistance to ABT-199 in acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27696. doi: 10.1038/srep27696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Teh TC, Nguyen NY, Glaser S, Moujalled D, Pomilio G. Eradication of acute myeloid leukemia is enhanced by combined Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 targeting. Blood. 2014;124:988. doi: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.988.988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pan R, Ruvolo VR, Wei J, Konopleva M, Reed JC, Pellecchia M, et al. Inhibition of Mcl-1 with the pan-Bcl-2 family inhibitor (-)BI97D6 overcomes ABT-737 resistance in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;126:363–72. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-10-604975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pan R, Hogdal LJ, Benito JM, Bucci D, Han L, Borthakur G, et al. Selective BCL-2 inhibition by ABT-199 causes on-target cell death in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:362–75. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Inoue-Yamauchi A, Jeng PS, Kim K, Chen HC, Han S, Ganesan YT, et al. Targeting the differential addiction to anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family for cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16078. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O’Neill KL, Huang K, Zhang J, Chen Y, Luo X. Inactivation of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins activates Bax/Bak through the outer mitochondrial membrane. Genes Dev. 2016;30:973–88. doi: 10.1101/gad.276725.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Takahashi H, Chen MC, Pham H, Matsuo Y, Ishiguro H, Reber HA, et al. Simultaneous knock-down of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 induces apoptosis through Bax activation in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:2980–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang H, Guttikonda S, Roberts L, Uziel T, Semizarov D, Elmore SW, et al. Mcl-1 is critical for survival in a subgroup of non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2010;30:1963–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Delft MF, Wei AH, Mason KD, Vandenberg CJ, Chen L, Czabotar PE, et al. The BH3 mimetic ABT-737 targets selective Bcl-2 proteins and efficiently induces apoptosis via Bak/Bax if Mcl-1 is neutralized. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:389–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.08.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lin X, Morgan-Lappe S, Huang X, Li L, Zakula DM, Vernetti LA, et al. “Seed” analysis of off-target siRNAs reveals an essential role of Mcl-1 in resistance to the small-molecule Bcl-2/Bcl-XL inhibitor ABT-737. Oncogene. 2007;26:3972–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vogler M, Butterworth M, Majid A, Walewska RJ, Sun XM, Dyer MJS, et al. Concurrent up-regulation of BCL-XL and BCL2A1 induces approximately 1000-fold resistance to ABT-737 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009;113:4403–13. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-08-173310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Varadarajan S, Vogler M, Butterworth M, Dinsdale D, Walensky LD, Cohen GM. Evaluation and critical assessment of putative MCL-1 inhibitors. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:1475–84. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lucas CM, Milani M, Butterworth M, Carmell N, Scott LJ, Clark RE, et al. High CIP2A levels correlate with an antiapoptotic phenotype that can be overcome by targeting BCL-XL in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30:1273–81. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Delbridge AR, Aubrey BJ, Hyland C, Bernardini JP, Di Rago L, Garnier JM, et al. The BH3-only proteins BIM and PUMA are not critical for the reticulocyte apoptosis caused by loss of the pro-survival protein BCL-XL. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2914. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Varadarajan S, Poornima P, Milani M, Gowda K, Amin S, Wang HG, et al. Maritoclax and dinaciclib inhibit MCL-1 activity and induce apoptosis in both a MCL-1-dependent and independent manner. Oncotarget. 2015;6:12668–81. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Varadarajan S, Butterworth M, Wei J, Pellecchia M, Dinsdale D, Cohen GM. Sabutoclax (BI97C1) and BI112D1, putative inhibitors of MCL-1, induce mitochondrial fragmentation either upstream of or independent of apoptosis. Neoplasia. 2013;15:568–78. doi: 10.1593/neo.13230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang C, Youle RJ. Predominant requirement of Bax for apoptosis in HCT116 cells is determined by Mcl-1’s inhibitory effect on Bak. Oncogene. 2011;31:3177–89. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hantusch A, Das KK, García-Sáez AJ, Brunner T, Rehm M. Bax retrotranslocation potentiates Bcl-xL’s antiapoptotic activity and is essential for switch-like transitions between MOMP competency and resistance. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:430. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0464-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Edlich F, Banerjee S, Suzuki M, Cleland MM, Arnoult D, Wang C, et al. Bcl-x(L) retrotranslocates Bax from the mitochondria into the cytosol. Cell. 2011;145:104–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Todt F, Cakir Z, Reichenbach F, Emschermann F, Lauterwasser J, Kaiser A, et al. Differential retrotranslocation of mitochondrial Bax and Bak. EMBO J. 2015;34:67–80. doi: 10.15252/embj.201488806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Todt F, Cakir Z, Reichenbach F, Youle RJ, Edlich F. The C-terminal helix of Bcl-x(L) mediates Bax retrotranslocation from the mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:333–42. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lauterwasser J, Todt F, Zerbes RM, Nguyen TN, Craigen W, Lazarou M, et al. The porin VDAC2 is the mitochondrial platform for Bax retrotranslocation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32994. doi: 10.1038/srep32994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schellenberg B, Wang P, Keeble JA, Rodriguez-Enriquez R, Walker S, Owens TW, et al. Bax exists in a dynamic equilibrium between the cytosol and mitochondria to control apoptotic priming. Mol Cell. 2013;49:959–71. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Renault TT, Teijido O, Missire F, Ganesan YT, Velours G, Arokium H, et al. Bcl-xL stimulates Bax relocation to mitochondria and primes cells to ABT-737. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;64:136–46. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu X, Zhang LS, Toombs J, Kuo YC, Piazza JT, Tuladhar R, et al. Extra-mitochondrial prosurvival BCL-2 proteins regulate gene transcription by inhibiting the SUFU tumour suppressor. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:1226–36. doi: 10.1038/ncb3616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Escudero S, Zaganjor E, Lee S, Mill CP, Morgan AM, Crawford EB, et al. Dynamic regulation of long-chain fatty acid oxidation by a noncanonical interaction between the MCL-1 BH3 helix and VLCAD. Mol Cell. 2018;69:729. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.