Abstract
In Taiwan, men who have sex with men (MSM) are at disproportionate risk of HIV infection. We examined awareness and acceptability of future HIV vaccines. From July to August 2014, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with MSM recruited through community-based organizations (CBOs) in 2 cities. Among 200 participants (mean age, 27.6 years), half reported multiple partners and one-third condomless anal sex (past 3 months); 12% were HIV-positive. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) use was reported by 42.7%. Over two-thirds (69.0%) were aware of HIV vaccine research, but less than half (43.8%) would accept an HIV vaccine if available. In multivariable analysis, higher educational attainment, >5 sex partners, and TCM use were positively associated with HIV vaccine awareness. Culturally informed HIV vaccine preparedness in Taiwan may be supported by a complementary approach to TCM and HIV prevention technologies, tailoring information for MSM with lower education and targeting those at high risk through gay-identified CBOs.
Keywords: HIV prevention, HIV vaccines, men who have sex with men, traditional Chinese medicine, Taiwan
Introduction
In Taiwan, men who have sex with men (MSM) account for 60.4% of the over 33 000 people living with HIV, and the proportion of MSM among new HIV infections is increasing—from 65.5% in 2010 to 77.4% in 2015.1 HIV vaccines and other new prevention technologies are sorely needed to control epidemics among MSM in Asia2 including Taiwan. Ultimately, an HIV vaccine represents the best strategy for controlling the AIDS epidemic.3
Several trials underway globally build on incremental progress in HIV vaccine development. These include a phase III trial with 5400 HIV-uninfected adults in southern Africa (HVTN 702),4,5 which tests a newer version of the vaccine regimen deemed moderately efficacious in the earlier RV144 phase III trial in Thailand.6 A phase IIb trial with 2600 HIV-uninfected women in sub-Saharan Africa (HVTN 705; “Imbokodo”) is testing a new type of investigational “mosaic” HIV vaccine that aims to offer protection across various HIV subtypes that predominate in different geographical regions globally.5 Nevertheless, widespread research-to-practice gaps across innovations in HIV and other preventive technologies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), indicate the importance of sociocultural and behavioral factors in product effectiveness.7–9 HIV vaccine preparedness efforts, including sociobehavioral research and educational initiatives, are needed in different geographical settings and cultural milieus to support the successful introduction of HIV vaccines in development.
HIV vaccine awareness is a first step in promoting preparedness for a future vaccine. In the Asian context, studies in India identified high HIV vaccine awareness (82.2%) in a general population sample,10 but most low-socioeconomic status Indian MSM had never heard of HIV vaccine research.11 Investigations in the United States showed a range of HIV vaccine awareness from 47.6% to 55.1% in the general population, with 36.5% to 73.8% HIV vaccine awareness among vulnerable populations, including MSM.12 Factors associated with HIV vaccine awareness included educational attainment10 and sexual risk behaviors, with some data suggesting possible increases in condomless sex (ie, risk compensation) among MSM in the wake of an HIV vaccine.13,14
What Do We Already Know about This Topic?
Despite extensive progress in HIV prevention and treatment, enduring disparities in HIV infections and access to care globally indicate that an HIV vaccine is needed to end the epidemic. Substantial research-to-practice gaps in the implementation of new HIV prevention technologies suggest the importance of location population-specific HIV vaccine preparedness efforts to support the successful introduction of HIV vaccines in development.
How Does Your Research Contribute to the Field?
This study examined HIV vaccine awareness and acceptability among MSM in Taiwan, who are vastly overrepresented in new HIV infections. We identified sociodemographic, sexual risk, and sociocultural factors, including HIV stigma and traditional Chinese medicine use, and their impact on HIV vaccine preparedness.
What Are Your Research’s Implications Toward Theory, Practice, or Policy?
HIV vaccine preparedness efforts in Taiwan should adopt a complementary approach to traditional Chinese medicine and HIV prevention technologies, tailor information for MSM and transgender people, particularly those with lower education, and target MSM at high risk through partnerships with community-based organizations (CBOs) serving gay communities.
HIV vaccine acceptability, another element of HIV vaccine preparedness, also varies widely across populations and contexts; a systematic review identified acceptability from 37.2 to 94.0 (100-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability; mean = 65.6).7 Limited investigations with MSM in Thailand found moderate (58.3/100) HIV vaccine acceptability.13 Factors associated with HIV vaccine acceptability have included vaccine efficacy, perceived HIV risk, and safety concerns.8,15 Although we are not aware of previous research on HIV vaccine acceptability in Taiwan or other Chinese cultures, moderate levels of PrEP acceptability have been identified among MSM in China16 and Taiwan17–19; correlates of PrEP acceptability included older age, higher income, and engaging in higher risk sexual practices.16–19
In addition to sociodemographic factors and sexual risk behaviors, HIV vaccine preparedness is likely to be influenced by “local vaccination cultures,” including traditional health care practices and related concerns about vaccine safety.20–22 In Chinese societies, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used as a preventive measure for more than 5000 years.23,24 Perceived conflicts between Western and traditional medicine may give rise to discomfort and suspicion about HIV vaccines.20,25 In some Asian contexts, TCM has been seen as complementary to Western medicine,26 while in others it has been understood as obviating the need for Western medicine.27 In Taiwan and China, TCM use by people living with HIV was associated with reduced side effects from antiretroviral treatment28 and improved immune functioning,29,30 suggesting evidence for complementary usage. Despite high levels of TCM use (28% past year) in Taiwan,31,32 as in many other Chinese societies, the implications of TCM use for HIV vaccines have not been reported.
HIV stigma may also be a barrier to HIV vaccine preparedness as reported in qualitative studies conducted with MSM in India,11 Thailand,13,33 South Africa,34 and Canada.20 In some Asian cultures, HIV stigma may be a key element in decisions about HIV vaccination.33 In China and Taiwan, for instance, HIV stigma has been documented as a barrier in access to HIV prevention and care services among MSM35 and to engagement in HIV-related community events.36
In order to prepare for the introduction of future HIV vaccines and other new biomedical prevention technologies amidst marked disparities in HIV prevalence, the aim of this study was to investigate sociocultural and behavioral factors that may influence HIV vaccine awareness and acceptability among MSM in Taiwan.
Methods
Study Design and Recruitment
Taiwan is an island (pop. est. 23.5 million) located approximately 100 miles from Mainland China. While attitudes toward human rights for sexual minorities in Taiwan are gradually improving, persistent stigma renders MSM a “hard-to-reach” population using traditional random sampling.37,38 We conducted a cross-sectional survey among participants recruited using convenience sampling through community-based organizations (CBOs) serving MSM in Taipei and Taichung, 2 large metropolitan areas. A recruitment letter describing the study was given to all clients who visited the 2 collaborating CBOs from July to August 2014. Inclusion criteria were: (1) self-identified as gay, bisexual, MSM, or transgender; (2) at least 18 years of age; (3) not an employee of the recruitment site; (4) able to read and write Chinese, and understand Mandarin; and (5) living in Taiwan. Those who indicated interest and met the eligibility criteria were invited to complete the survey questionnaire.
Data Collection
All study materials, including the recruitment letter, consent form, and self-administered paper-and-pencil survey questionnaire, were written in English, translated into Chinese language, back-translated into English, and revised in Chinese. Participants completed the 25- to 30-minute questionnaire in a private room at one of the CBOs or in a mutually agreed upon public space nearby for those MSM who chose not to enter the premises of a gay-identified CBO. Participants returned the questionnaire to the research coordinator in an unmarked, sealed envelope and were provided with 300 TWD (∼10 USD) compensation.
Measures
Two questions, adapted from studies in Thailand13,39 and the United States,12 assessed HIV vaccine awareness (“Have you ever heard about HIV vaccine research?”) and acceptability (“If an HIV vaccine became available in the future, do you think you would use it?”). Responses were indicated on a 4-point Likert-type scale with higher scores indicating higher awareness or acceptability. Responses to both questions were dichotomized: awareness (1 = yes, a lot/somewhat; 0 = no, a little bit/no) and acceptability (1 = yes, definitely; 0 = all other responses).
Sociodemographic items included age, gender (male/transgender), sexual orientation (gay/bisexual or heterosexual/straight), education (less than college/college or above), employment status (full time/not full time), relationship status (single, monogamous or open relationship), and monthly income (<30 000 TWD [∼ $950 USD] or ≥30 000 TWD). Median monthly income in Taiwan is 20 000 to 29 999 TWD (∼ $633-$950 USD).
HIV risk items included number of male (and female) sexual partners (past 3 months), self-reported sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis by a physician (past year; yes/no), self-reported HIV test result (positive/negative/untested), sexual role (top/bottom/versatile), transactional sex (past 3 months; yes/no), and condomless anal (and vaginal) sex (past 3 months; yes/no).13 The number of female sex partners (n = 3), transactional sex (n = 7), and condom use for vaginal sex (n = 4) were excluded from analysis due to few applicable responses. The number of male sex partners (past 3 months) was grouped into 3 categories (0-1, 2-5, and >5), based on HIV prevention research conducted among MSM in Taiwan18 and China.16 In a study with MSM in Taiwan, >5 sex partners was associated with high-risk behaviors (ie, recreational drug use and condomless sex).40
Two dichotomous questions were developed to assess TCM use: “Have you used TCM for treatment instead of medicine prescribed by a Western medical doctor?” (1 = yes; 0 = no) and, “Do you currently use TCM?” (1 = yes; 0 = no).
We used an HIV stigma scale that demonstrated high reliability and validity among MSM in China41 and India.42,43 Felt-normative stigma measures perceptions about HIV stigma in participants’ communities; vicarious stigma measures indirect experiences of discrimination in health care settings, family, and community. These items were assessed on a 4-point Likert-type scale (0 to 3), with higher scores indicating higher HIV stigma. For the current study, Cronbach α was .94 for the felt-normative and .87 for the vicarious stigma scale.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24.0 (International Business Machines Corp, New York). Descriptive analyses were conducted to report frequencies, proportions, means, and standard deviations (SD) of sample characteristics. Bivariate analyses were then conducted using χ2 or Fisher exact tests to measure the association of HIV vaccine awareness and acceptability with sociodemographic and sexual behaviors. Independent sample t tests examined continuous independent variables (eg, age), and mean differences between HIV vaccine awareness and acceptability. The normality of the distribution was tested prior to applying independent sample t tests.
Two multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify characteristics independently associated with HIV vaccine awareness and acceptability. The MSM who indicated being HIV-positive (n = 24) were retained in the analyses of HIV vaccine awareness, in accordance with the principle of Greater Involvement of People Living with HIV,44 given their important role in promoting awareness about HIV prevention and related research; but they were excluded from the analyses of acceptability, given the study focus on a preventive HIV vaccine. Variables with a bivariate association with the outcome at P < .25 were selected for inclusion in the full model. Nonsignificant variables were then removed and a second, reduced version was retained as the final model. Model fit of each final model was assessed with Hosmer, Lemeshow, and Sturdivant45 goodness-of-fit test by using predicted value groups.
Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of the University of Toronto (Reference number: 30370), with administrative approvals from Taiwan Tongzhi (LGBT) Hotline Association and Taiwan GDi Association. All participants provided written informed consent. At the time of the study, the institution of ethical review was not yet thoroughly established in Taiwan, particularly for social sciences research46; thus, adherence to ethical guidelines was ensured by the University of Toronto in collaboration with the 2 research partner organizations.
Results
A total of 221 MSM were invited to participate in the study when they visited or contacted 1 of the 2 collaborating CBOs. Among 21 of those invited to participate, 8 declined, 5 withdrew, and 8 were ineligible (<18-years-old or not self-identified gay/MSM). Two hundred MSM completed the questionnaire, for a response rate of 90.5%.
Sample Characteristics and Descriptive Analysis
Table 1 indicates the sample characteristics. Participants’ mean age was 27.6 years (SD = 6.8; range, 18-50 years). The majority identified as male (96.5%), gay (88.0%), single (57.5%), had college or postgraduate degrees (67.0%), full-time jobs (58.0%), and monthly income <$30,000 TWD (62.5%). The mean number of male sex partners in the past 3 months was 2.5 (median = 1; range, 0-15). Nearly one-third (32.0%) reported condomless anal sex (past 3 months). Eleven percent of the participants reported a physician-diagnosed STI in the past year; 12.0% self-reported being HIV positive, with 14.0% never tested or of unknown status.
Table 1.
Demographics, Sexual Risk and Sociocultural Factors, and HIV Vaccine Awareness among MSM in Taiwan.a
| Characteristic | Total, N (%) | Bivariate Analysis | Multivariable Analysis (Final Model) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No, n (%) | Yes, n (%) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 27.6 (6.8) | 28.2 (6.8) | 26.3 (6.2) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 193 (96.5) | 61 (98.4) | 132 (95.7) | |
| Transgender | 7 (3.5) | 1 (1.6) | 6 (4.3) | |
| Sexual orientation | ||||
| Gay | 176 (88.0) | 55 (88.7) | 121 (87.7) | |
| Bisexual/heterosexual | 24 (12.0) | 7 (11.3) | 17 (12.3) | |
| Education | ||||
| Less than college | 66 (33.0) | 28 (45.2) | 38 (27.5)b | Ref. |
| College or above | 134 (67.0) | 34 (54.8) | 100 (72.5) | 2.08 (1.07-4.07)b |
| Employment status | ||||
| Full-time | 115 (57.5) | 32 (51.6) | 55 (60.1) | |
| Not full-time | 85 (42.5) | 30 (48.4) | 83 (39.9) | |
| Monthly income | ||||
| < $30 000 | 125 (62.5) | 47 (75.8) | 78 (56.5)c | |
| ≥ $30 000 | 75 (37.5) | 15 (24.2) | 60 (43.5) | |
| Current relationship status | ||||
| Monogamous relationship | 71 (35.5) | 16 (25.8) | 55 (39.9) | Ref. |
| Single | 115 (57.5) | 40 (64.5) | 75 (54.3) | 0.57 (0.29-1.17) |
| Open relationship | 14 (7.0) | 6 (9.7) | 8 (5.8) | 0.34 (0.10-1.19) |
| Sexual risk indicators | ||||
| Number of male sex partners, past 3 months (missing = 2) | ||||
| 0-1 | 103 (52.0) | 39 (62.9) | 64 (47.1) | Ref. |
| 2-5 | 71 (35.9) | 20 (32.3) | 51 (37.5) | 1.69 (0.85-3.35) |
| > 5 | 24 (12.1) | 3 (4.8) | 21 (15.4) | 4.24 (1.15-15.60)b |
| Sexual role | ||||
| Always bottom | 38 (20.2) | 11 (19.0) | 27 (20.8) | |
| Versatile/both | 120 (63.8) | 37 (63.8) | 83 (63.8) | |
| Always top | 30 (16.0) | 10 (17.2) | 20 (15.4) | |
| Condomless anal sex | ||||
| No | 64 (32.0) | 18 (29.0) | 46 (33.3) | |
| Yes | 136 (68.0) | 44 (71.0) | 92 (66.7) | |
| Sexually transmitted infection, past year | ||||
| No | 178 (89.0) | 4 (6.5) | 18 (13.0) | |
| Yes | 9 (11.0) | 58 (93.5) | 120 (87.0) | |
| HIV serostatus | ||||
| HIV positive | 24 (12.0) | 5 (8.1) | 19 (13.8) | |
| HIV negative | 148 (74.0) | 47 (75.8) | 101 (73.2) | |
| Untested | 28 (14.0) | 10 (16.1) | 18 (13.0) | |
| Sociocultural factors | ||||
| Ever used TCM for treatment (missing = 1) | ||||
| No | 114 (57.3) | 27 (43.5) | 58 (42.3) | |
| Yes | 85 (42.7) | 35 (56.5) | 79 (57.7) | |
| Current TCM use (missing = 1) | ||||
| No | 177 (88.9) | 3 (4.8) | 19 (13.9) | Ref. |
| Yes | 22 (11.1) | 59 (95.2) | 118 (86.1) | 3.79 (1.03-13.96)b |
| HIV stigma, mean (SD) | ||||
| Felt-normative stigma | 1.6 (0.8) | 1.7 (0.7) | 1.6 (0.8) | |
| Vicarious stigma | 1.5 (0.7) | 1.3 (0.6) | 1.5 (0.7) | |
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; SD, standard deviation.
an = 200.
b P < .05.
c P < .01.
Ever having used TCM for treatment instead of medications prescribed by a Western medical doctor was reported by 42.7%; 11.1% reported current TCM use. The mean of felt-normative HIV stigma was 1.6 (SD = 0.8) and of vicarious HIV stigma was 1.5 (SD = 0.7) on the 0-3 scale, indicating moderate levels of stigma.
HIV Vaccine Awareness
Over two-thirds (69.0%) of participants indicated being aware of HIV vaccine research or development efforts (see Table 1). In bivariate analyses, greater HIV vaccine awareness was associated with higher education (χ2 = 6.01, P < .05), income >30 000 TWD (χ2 = 6.79, P < .01), and >1 male sex partner (χ2 = 6.33, P < .05). Older MSM (t = −1.89, P = .06), and those who currently use TCM (χ2 = 3.54, P = .06) were marginally more aware of HIV vaccines. HIV stigma showed no statistically significant differences in HIV vaccine awareness.
HIV Vaccine Acceptability
Less than half of participants (43.8%; excluding people living with HIV, n = 24) reported willingness to use an HIV vaccine if it became available in the future. Demographics, sexual behaviors, TCM use, and HIV stigma showed no significant differences on HIV vaccine acceptability in bivariate analyses (Table 1).
Correlates of HIV Vaccine Awareness and Acceptability
For HIV vaccine awareness, 8 variables were included in the full model (P < .25); 4 variables (age, STI, felt-normative, and vicarious stigma) were removed as they did not contribute meaningfully to the outcome. Due to the high association between education and monthly income (χ2 = 13.32, P < 0.001), we retained only education in the model. The reduced version modeled HIV vaccine awareness as a function of education, current relationship status, number of male sex partners, and current use of TCM (Table 2).
Table 2.
Demographics, Sexual Risk and Sociocultural Factors, and HIV Vaccine Acceptability among MSM in Taiwan.a
| Bivariate Analysis | Multivariable Analysis (Final Model) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Total | No | Yes | |
| N (%) | n (%) | n (%) | AOR (95% CI) | |
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 27.6 (6.8) | 27.5 (7.0) | 27.2 (6.3) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 193 (96.5) | 108 (95.6) | 85 (97.7) | |
| Transgender | 7 (3.5) | 5 (4.4) | 2 (2.3) | |
| Sexual orientation | ||||
| Gay | 176 (88.0) | 84 (84.4) | 70 (90.9) | 0.59 (0.23-1.56) |
| Bisexual/heterosexual | 24 (12.0) | 15 (15.2) | 7 (9.1) | Ref. |
| Education | ||||
| Less than college | 66 (33.0) | 34 (34.3) | 26 (33.8) | |
| College or above | 134 (67.0) | 65 (65.7) | 51 (66.2) | |
| Employment status | ||||
| Full-time | 115 (57.5) | 52 (52.5) | 47 (61.0) | |
| Not full-time | 85 (42.5) | 47 (47.5) | 30 (39.0) | |
| Monthly income | ||||
| < $30 000 | 125 (62.5) | 62 (62.6) | 44 (57.1) | |
| ≥ $30 000 | 75 (37.5) | 37 (37.4) | 33 (42.9) | |
| Current relationship status | ||||
| Monogamous relationship | 71 (35.5) | 35 (35.4) | 26 (33.8) | |
| Single | 115 (57.5) | 56 (56.6) | 46 (59.7) | |
| Open relationship | 14 (7.0) | 8 (8.1) | 5 (6.5) | |
| Sexual risk indicators | ||||
| Number of male sex partners, past 3 months (missing = 2) | ||||
| 0-1 | 103 (52.0) | 56 (57.1) | 36 (46.8) | Ref. |
| 2-5 | 71 (35.9) | 32 (32.7) | 35 (45.5) | 0.59 (0.31-1.12) |
| > 5 | 24 (12.1) | 10 (10.2) | 6 (7.8) | 1.11 (0.37-3.33) |
| Sexual role | ||||
| Always bottom | 38 (20.2) | 19 (20.7) | 13 (17.8) | |
| Versatile/both | 120 (63.8) | 59 (64.1) | 45 (61.6) | |
| Always top | 30 (16.0) | 14 (15.2) | 15 (20.5) | |
| Condomless anal sex | ||||
| No | 64 (32.0) | 29 (29.3) | 26 (33.8) | |
| Yes | 136 (68.0) | 70 (70.7) | 51 (66.2) | |
| Sexually transmitted infection, past year | ||||
| No | 178 (89.0) | 95 (96.0) | 72 (93.5) | |
| Yes | 9 (11.0) | 4 (4.0) | 5 (6.5) | |
| Sociocultural factors | ||||
| Ever used TCM for treatment (missing = 1) | ||||
| No | 114 (57.3) | 54 (55.1) | 41 (53.2) | |
| Yes | 85 (42.7) | 44 (44.9) | 36 (46.8) | |
| Current TCM use (missing = 1) | ||||
| No | 177 (88.9) | 86 (87.7) | 70 (90.9) | |
| Yes | 22 (11.1) | 12 (12.2) | 7 (9.1) | |
| HIV stigma, mean (SD) | ||||
| Felt-normative stigma | 1.6 (0.8) | 1.6 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.8) | |
| Vicarious stigma | 1.5 (0.7) | 1.6 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.8) | |
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine; SD, standard deviation.
an = 176.
Men who have sex with men with college degrees or higher had greater than 2-fold higher odds of HIV vaccine awareness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.08, confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-4.07, P < .05). Participants with >5 sex partners had 4-fold higher odds of HIV vaccine awareness (AOR = 4.24, CI = 1.15-15.60, P < .05). Those who currently use TCM had nearly 4-fold higher odds of HIV vaccine awareness (AOR = 3.79, CI = 1.03-13.96, P < .05). The model successfully predicted 66.5% of cases, with 87.4% sensitivity and 21.0% specificity (Nagelkerke R2 = .14).
HIV vaccine acceptability was modeled as a function of sexual orientation and number of male sex partners; the model (not shown) explained little of the outcome variance (χ2 = 4.45, df = 4, P = .35), with Nagelkerke R2 = .03.
Discussion
In this study of community-recruited MSM in 2 major metropolitan areas in Taiwan, the majority of participants were aware of HIV vaccines; this suggests a starting point for educational efforts to support HIV vaccine preparedness. The 12.0% HIV-positive and 11.0% with a physician-diagnosed STI in the past year among this community sample, with nearly half overall reporting multiple partners and one-third condomless anal sex (past 3 months), is indicative of high risk of HIV acquisition and transmission. Nevertheless, a future HIV vaccine was acceptable to less than half of those surveyed.
The positive association observed between HIV vaccine awareness and educational attainment, controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics, is consistent with findings from India in which formal educational attainment predicts increased knowledge about HIV and HIV vaccines.10 Tailoring HIV vaccine educational efforts to communicate about HIV vaccines with MSM with lower levels of education may help to broaden awareness.
The more than 4-fold higher odds of HIV vaccine awareness among MSM with more than 5 sex partners (past 3 months) versus 1 or no sex partners may be explained by their higher risk for HIV infection—an encouraging sign for HIV prevention efforts. HIV vaccine education and awareness initiatives for MSM in Taiwan might benefit from supporting accurate perceptions of the disproportionate HIV risk among MSM and by emphasizing the potential role of HIV vaccines and other new prevention technologies as part of combination prevention.
The over 3-fold higher odds of HIV vaccine awareness among MSM who are current TCM users is a potentially counterintuitive finding—if one understands TCM and Western medicine as in opposition to one another. However, this finding is corroborated by evidence from other East Asian contexts in which health care institution acceptance of TCM was associated with patients’ concurrent use of TCM and Western medicine.26 Thus, these 2 approaches need not be seen in opposition. A study of persons living with HIV in China similarly indicates complementary use of antiretroviral treatment and TCM, depending on individuals’ particular symptoms.28
Nearly half of MSM in the present study reported ever using TCM, on par with general population data on TCM use in Taiwan.31 This suggests that building partnerships between Western medical and TCM practitioners and institutions may be a viable strategy for reaching out to the many TCM users to increase awareness about new HIV prevention technologies, including future HIV vaccines.47 A similar model of working with TCM practitioners was successfully implemented in the United States to promote hepatitis B vaccine awareness and prevention for Asian TCM users.23 However, traditional medicine practitioners in Taiwan, as in other contexts,48 may lack relevant training in HIV; and both TCM and Western medical practitioners may lack competencies in working with sexual minority populations, requiring further training in order to effectively support HIV vaccine awareness.
Finally, the mean felt-normative stigma score indicates that most MSM reported at least some people in their community held negative beliefs and attitudes toward people living with HIV (eg, that they are shameful). The mean vicarious stigma score indicates that many MSM reported hearing stories about mistreatment and social exclusion of people living with HIV. Although HIV stigma was not significantly associated with HIV vaccine awareness or acceptability, the prevalence of HIV stigma among this predominantly HIV-negative sample of MSM is concerning. HIV stigma was negatively associated with HIV testing (a necessary step in HIV vaccine uptake) and with acceptability of a future rectal microbicide among HIV-negative MSM in Thailand.49
Limitations to this study include the use of convenience sampling through CBOs, which limits generalizability to other MSM in Taiwan, particularly those who are not affiliated with gay-identified organizations. However, our partnerships with gay-identified CBOs facilitated successful recruitment of MSM, including HIV-positive MSM, who remain a population that is challenging to recruit amidst enduring sexual stigma and HIV stigma in Taiwan. In general, MSM who do not attend CBOs may indicate lower awareness and acceptability of HIV vaccines, and higher levels of HIV stigma. Additionally, we did not assess the acceptability of possible characteristics of future HIV vaccines (eg, based on percent efficacy and duration of protection) or other possible reasons for acceptability, which might provide additional information for interventions to increase future uptake.13,50,51 However, HIV vaccine awareness and acceptability may shift as research progresses and the results of clinical trials of candidate HIV vaccines become available.
With disproportionate HIV prevalence among MSM in Taiwan, as is characteristic across the Asia-Pacific region,52 the present findings suggest cultural opportunities and challenges for supporting HIV vaccine preparedness, including the pivotal role of CBOs serving MSM amidst high levels of HIV stigma, and the importance of building on complementary use of TCM and Western medicine.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Taiwan Tongzhi (LGBT) Hotline Association and Taiwan GDi Association, and all study participants. The funding organization had no role in any of the following: the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported in part by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team Grant (THA-118570; PI: Newman) and the Canada Research Chairs Program.
ORCID iD: Peter A. Newman, Ph.D.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0444-5915
References
- 1. Taiwanese Center for Disease Control (TCDC). (2018). Statistics & Analysis. 2018. http://www.cdc.gov.tw/english/submenu.aspx?treeid=00ED75D6C887BB27&nowtreeid=00ED75D6C887BB27. Accessed January 25, 2019.
- 2. Phanuphak N, Lo YR, Shao Y, et al. HIV epidemic in Asia: implications for HIV vaccine and other prevention trials. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015;31(11):1060–1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fauci AS, Marston HD. Ending AIDS—is an HIV vaccine necessary? New Eng J Med. 2014;370(6):495–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bekker LG, Gray GE. Hope for HIV control in Southern Africa: the continued quest for a vaccine. PLoS Med. 2017;14(2):e1002241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. National Institutes of Health. NIH and Partners Launch HIV Vaccine Efficacy Study: Public-private Partnership Begins Clinical Trial in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2018. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-partners-launch-hiv-vaccine-efficacy-study. Accessed January 25, 2019.
- 6. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. New Eng J Med. 2009;361(23):2209–2220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Newman PA, Duan N, Rudy ET, Anton PA. Challenges for HIV vaccine dissemination and clinical trial recruitment: if we build it, will they come? AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2004;18(12):691–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Newman PA, Logie C. HIV vaccine acceptability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2010;24(11):1749–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299(2):211–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sahay S, Mehendale S, Sane S, et al. Correlates of HIV vaccine trial participation: an Indian perspective. Vaccine. 2005;23(11):1351–1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Singhal N, Jerajani J, Shunmugam M. Willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials among men who have sex with men in Chennai and Mumbai, India: a social ecological approach. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Allen MA, Liang TS, La Salvia T, Tjugum B, Gulakowski RJ, Murguía M. Assessing the attitudes, knowledge, and awareness of HIV vaccine research among adults in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40(5):617–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Newman PA, Roungprakhon S, Tepjan S, Yim S. Preventive HIV vaccine acceptability and behavioral risk compensation among high-risk men who have sex with men and transgenders in Thailand. Vaccine. 2010;28(4):958–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tully S, Cojocaru M, Bauch CT. Sexual behavior, risk perception, and HIV transmission can respond to HIV antiviral drugs and vaccines through multiple pathways. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Newman PA, Seiden DS, Roberts KJ, Kakinami L, Duan N. A small dose of HIV? HIV vaccine mental models and risk communication. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36(2):321–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ding Y, Yan H, Ning Z, et al. Low willingness and actual uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China. Biosci Trends. 2016;10(2):113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chuang DM, Newman PA. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and acceptability among men who have sex with men in Taiwan. AIDS Educ Prev. 30(6):490–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ko NY, Chen BJ, Li CW, Ku WW Hsu ST. Willingness to self-pay for pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men: a national online survey in Taiwan. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(2):128–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ko NY, Wu HJ, Strong C, Li CW, Ku WW, Hsu ST. Differences in awareness of and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis and anticipated condom use among serodiscordant couples in Taiwan. AIDS Care. 2018;30(10):1306–1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Newman PA, Woodford MR, Logie C. HIV vaccine acceptability and culturally appropriate dissemination among sexually diverse Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(1):87–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rubincam C, Lacombe-Duncan A, Newman PA. Taking culture seriously in biomedical HIV prevention trials: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15(3):331–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Streefland PH. Introduction of a HIV vaccine in developing countries: social and cultural dimensions. Vaccine. 2003;21(13-14):1304–1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chang ET, Lin SY, Sue E, Bergin M, So SK, Su J. Building partnerships with traditional Chinese medicine practitioners to increase hepatitis B awareness and prevention. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(10):1125–1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wu XF, Wang J, Li Y, Tang YL, Zhao DD. Thoughts on intervention in HIV/AIDS with traditional Chinese medicine. J Tradit Chin Med. 2011;31(4):265–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nyika A. Ethical and regulatory issues surrounding African traditional medicine in the context of HIV/AIDS. Dev World Bioeth. 2007;7(1):25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shim JM. The relationship between the use of complementary and alternative medicine and the use of biomedical services: evidence from East Asian medical systems. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016;28(1):51–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Feng L, Chiam PC, Kua EH, Ng TP. Use of complementary and alternative medicines and mental disorders in community-living Asian older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(3):243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chen WT, Shiu CS, Simoni J, et al. Attitudes toward antiretroviral therapy and complementary and alternative medicine in Chinese HIV-infected patients. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(3):203–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Deng X, Jiang M, Zhao X, Liang J. Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a systematic review. J Tradit Chin Med. 2014;34(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hung TC, Chen KB, Huang HJ, Chen CY. Lead screening for HIV of C-C chemokine receptor type 5 receptor inhibited by traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:313094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chen FP, Chen TJ, Kung YY, et al. Use frequency of traditional Chinese medicine in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shih CC, Liao CC, Su YC, Tsai CC, Lin JG. Gender differences in traditional Chinese medicine use among adults in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e32540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Newman PA, Roungprakhon S, Tepjan S, Yim S, Walisser R. A social vaccine? Social and structural contexts of HIV vaccine acceptability among most-at-risk population in Thailand. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(9):1009–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sayles JN, Macphail CL, Newman PA, Cunningham WE. Future HIV vaccine acceptability among young adults in South Africa. Health Educ Behav. 2010;37(2):193–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Pyun T, Santos GM, Arreola S, et al. Internalized homophobia and reduced HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014;26(2):118–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Chuang DM, Lacombe-Duncan A. Community engagement among men who have sex with men living with HIV/AIDS in Taiwan. AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):445–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Chen YR, Wang P. Obstacles to LGBT human rights development in Taiwan. Positions East Asia Cultures Critique. 2010;18(2):399–407. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cheng YA, Wu FCF, Adamczyk A. Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995–2012. Chin Sociological Rev. 2016;48(4):317–345. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Wheelock A, Eisingerich AB, Ananworanich J, et al. Are Thai MSM willing to take PrEP for HIV prevention? An analysis of attitudes, preferences and acceptance. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ko NY, Tseng PC, Huang YC, Chen YC, Hsu ST. Seeking sex partners through the internet and mobile phone applications among men who have sex with men in Taiwan. AIDS Care. 2016;28(7):927–931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Choi KH, Steward WT, Miège P, Hudes E, Gregorich SE. Sexual stigma, coping styles, and psychological distress: a longitudinal study of men who have sex with men in Beijing, China. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(6):1483–1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Logie CH, Newman PA, Chakrapani V, Shunmugam M. Adapting the minority stress model: associations between gender non-conformity stigma, HIV-related stigma and depression among men who have sex with men in South India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(8):1261–1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Steward WT, Herek GM, Ramakrishna J, et al. HIV-related stigma: Adapting a theoretical framework for use in India. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(8):1225–1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. UNAIDS. The Greater Involvement of People Living with HIV/AIDS. 2007. http://data.unaids.org/pub/briefingnote/2007/jc1299_policy_brief_gipa.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2019.
- 45. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression analysis. 3rd ed New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kuo W-H. Turning ethics into institutions: the techno-politics of human research regulation in Taiwan. Sci Technol Soc. 2018;23(2):289–306. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Bodeker G, Carter G, Burford G, Dvorak-Little M. HIV/AIDS: traditional systems of health care in the management of a global epidemic. J Altern Complement Med. 2006;12(6):563–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Chomat AM, Wilson IB, Wanke CA, Selvakumar A, John KR, Issac R. Knowledge, beliefs, and health care practices relating to treatment of HIV in Vellore, India. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23(6):477–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Logie CH, Newman PA, Weaver J, Roungkraphon S, Tepjan S. HIV-related stigma and HIV prevention uptake among young men who have sex with men and transgender women in Thailand. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016;30(2):92–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Newman PA, Duan N, Lee SJ, et al. HIV vaccine acceptability among communities at risk: the impact of vaccine characteristics. Vaccine. 2006;24(12):2094–2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Lee SJ, Brooks RA, Newman PA, Seiden D, Sangthong R, Duan N. HIV vaccine acceptability among immigrant Thai residents in Los Angeles: a mixed-methods approach. AIDS Care. 2008;20(10):1161–1168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Baral SD, Grosso A, Holland C, Papworth E. The epidemiology of HIV among men who have sex with men in countries with generalized HIV epidemics. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9(2):156–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
