Abstract
Phytochromes (PHYs) are photoreceptor proteins first discovered in plants, where they control a variety of photomorphogenesis events. PHYs as photochromic proteins can reversibly switch between two distinct states: a red light (Pr) and a far-red light (Pfr) absorbing form. The discovery of Bacteriophytochromes (BphPs) in nonphotosynthetic bacteria has opened new frontiers in our understanding of the mechanisms by which these natural photoswitches can control single cell development, although the role of BphPs in vivo remains largely unknown. BphPs are dimeric proteins that consist of a photosensory core module (PCM) and an enzymatic domain, often a histidine kinase. The PCM is composed of three domains (PAS, GAF, and PHY). It holds a covalently bound open-chain tetrapyrrole (biliverdin, BV) chromophore. Upon absorption of light, the double bond between BV rings C and D isomerizes and reversibly switches the protein between Pr and Pfr states. We report crystal structures of the wild-type and mutant (His275Thr) forms of the canonical BphP from the nonphotosynthetic myxobacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca (SaBphP2) in the Pr state. Structures were determined at 1.65 Å and 2.2 Å (respectively), the highest resolution of any PCM construct to date. We also report the room temperature wild-type structure of the same protein determined at 2.1 Å at the SPring-8 Angstrom Compact free electron LAser (SACLA), Japan. Our results not only highlight and confirm important amino acids near the chromophore that play a role in Pr-Pfr photoconversion but also describe the signal transduction into the PHY domain which moves across tens of angstroms after the light stimulus.
INTRODUCTION
Phytochromes (PHYs) are red-light sensing enzymatic switches first discovered in plants, with homologs in the photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic bacteria. PHYs are composed of a photosensory core module (PCM) and an effector, enzymatic domain. In bacteriophytochromes (BphPs), the PCM consists of three domains named PAS (Per ARNT Sim), GAF (cGMP phosphodiesterase/adenylyl cyclase/FhIA), and PHY (phytochrome-specific GAF-related) [Fig. 1(a)].1–5 The effector domain is typically a histidine kinase, covalently linked to a PHY domain, although other nonenzymatic output domains can be found.6,7 Together, the PCM and effector domains are able to elicit an array of important physiological responses upon absorption of red light, due to a covalently bound-bilin based chromophore [Fig. 1(b)]. In photosynthetic bacteria, such as Rhodopseudomonas palustris, BphPs regulate the synthesis of light-harvesting complexes, which are essential in photosynthesis.8,9 However, the role of BphPs in nonphotosynthetic bacteria is less understood. Some nonphotosynthetic bacteria, such as Deinococcus radiodurans, use BphPs to regulate the production of carotenoid pigments, a vital defense mechanism against harmful light exposure.10 Others are involved in conjugation,11 plant colonization,12 and quorum sensing.13 We recently determined the crystal structures of an unusual BphP from nonphotosynthetic myxobacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca, denoted SaBphP1, which lacks a conserved histidine in the chromophore binding pocket and identified its important functional role in the unique photomorphogenic response of this micro-organism.5,14 Myxobacteria are distinguished among prokaryotes by a multicellular stage in their life cycle known as fruiting bodies, which in S. aurantiaca is controlled by light.15–17
Interestingly, S. aurantiaca also contains a second, canonical phytochrome (SaBphP2) which has a different photochemistry from SaBphP1. However, both proteins bind the same bilin chromophore and share a large amino acid sequence identity (38%).5,14,18 Biliverdin (BV) is an open-chain tetrapyrrole that is highly conjugated and allows for reversible photoconversion in BphPs between the red light absorbing (Pr, λmax 700 nm) and far-red light absorbing (Pfr, λmax 750 nm) states.19 The ability to form and photoconvert reversibly between two stable absorbing states allows phytochromes to act as light-regulated switches in many physiological processes, a characteristic that is unique among photoreceptors. BV is covalently bound to the PAS domain via a thioether linkage to a conserved cysteine and is characterized by a series of hydrogen bonds between its four pyrrole rings and amino acids within the GAF domain.2,20 Photoexcitation of BV leads to the Z/E isomerization of the C15=C16 double bond located between the C and D rings [Fig. 2(b)].21,22 As a result, a rotation of the D-ring leads to the formation of new hydrogen bonds around the chromophore, which causes major conformational changes throughout the polypeptide chains. These changes result in two distinct structures, one in the dark-adapted Pr state for the classical phytochrome which upon red-light exposure switches into Pfr and the other in the dark-adapted Pfr state for the bathy phytochromes which upon far-red light exposure reverts to Pr.23–26
Key to the phytochrome function is the primary photoresponse on picosecond and nanosecond timescales, which defines the moment at which light signals are translated into conformational changes ultimately impacting enzymatic activity.27 The conformational changes are currently not well understood due to the limited number of structures at the atomic resolution in the Pr and Pfr states and/or directly after photoexcitation of the same BphP.
Structural studies of BphPs are necessary in order to understand intricate details of BphP photochromism in real time, on ps to ms time scales. Furthermore, BphPs have been optimized as infrared fluorescent protein markers (IFPs) for in vivo imaging of internal organs in mammals.28 IFPs readily bind BV, abundant in mammalian cells due to heme metabolism, and are readily detectable through the skin, avoiding invasive surgical procedures. However, engineered, BphP-derived IFPs still have a fairly low fluorescence quantum yield (<14%)29 that could be improved with the better understanding of the initial steps in the BphP photocycle. Here, we report three crystal structures of the SaBphP2 photosensory core module (PCM), lacking the effector histidine kinase domain. The reported structures are of a SaBphP2 PCM in the wild-type (wt) and mutant forms determined at 1.65 Å and 2.2 Å, respectively. This is the highest resolution structure of any PCM construct in the wild-type form to date, revealing the important intricate details of the hydrogen-bonding network of the conserved amino acids and waters stabilizing BV chromophore in the Pr state. To assess the impact of both temperature and X-ray dose on the two structures of SaBphP2 and complement our earlier studies on the related SaBphP1 PCM, we also determined the ambient temperature structure of wild-type SaBphP2 PCM, essentially free of radiation damage as a result of using an X-ray free electron laser (XFEL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Protein expression and purification
The coding region for residues 1–497 of the wild-type SaBphP2 was amplified from S. aurantiaca DW4/3‐1 genomic DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The DNA was a gift from Dr. Rolf Müller (Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany), cut by restriction enzymes NdeI and HindIII (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and ligated into the corresponding sites of the expression vector pET28c(+) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The following pairs of primers were used to PCR-amplify the coding region of SaBphP2 PCM. Forward: 5′-GATACATATGCCCCCGTCCGTCTCTGAACTC-3′ and reverse: 5′-GATCAAGCTTAGGCCTGGCG CAGCAC-3′.
E. coli containing the vector of SaBphP2 PCM were coexpressed with heme oxygenase from plasmid pET11a in BL21 cells. Cells were grown aerobically at 37 °C to 3 × 108 cells/ml and induced at 18 °C for 16–18 h using 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside and 0.5 mM δ-aminolevulinic acid. Cells were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Cells were resuspended in 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, and 15% v/v glycerol with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Cells were lysed using sonication and centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred and protein was stabilized with exogenous 20 μM BV in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant solution was added to Talon Co2+ metal ion affinity chromatography columns (Takara Clontech). The protein was eluted with 300 mM imidazole, 20 mM NaCl, and 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0. Eluted protein was further purified via Amicon filtration (10 kDa cutoff) at 4000 rpm for 20 min, 3 times. All steps were performed under green safety lights. The protein size and purity were analyzed via silver-stained 10% sodiumdodecylsulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
UV-visible spectrum absorbance spectroscopy
Solution samples were illuminated using light interference filters of 660 nm and 750 nm, respectively, with a 10 nm bandwidth (ANDOVER, Salem, MA), and the spectra were assayed at room temperature from 240 to 800 nm with a Hitachi 3130 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Absorption spectra of the crushed SaBphP2 wild-type crystals were collected at room temperature using a microspectrophotometer at the BioCARS facility at the Advanced Photon Source. Crystal spectra were collected before and after illumination with 660 nm light from a high power light emitting diode (Thorlabs) for 1 min at ∼5 mW/mm2. The spectra were normalized and displayed, and difference spectra were calculated with the free plotting tool Xmgrace.
Protein crystallization
Crystallization conditions were identified using cryoscreens from Hampton Research (HR2‐121 and HR2‐122). Crystallization conditions were further optimized via a 96-well additive screen (Hampton Research HR2‐428). Screens produced SaBphP2 PCM crystals of 100 × 100 μm2. Final crystallization conditions (mother liquor) consisted of both cryoscreen solution and additive. Mother liquor consisted of 425 μl 0.17 M Ammonium acetate, 0.085 M Sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate pH 5.6, 25.5% w/v Polyethylene glycol 4000, 15% v/v Glycerol (cryoscreen solution), and 75 μl 20% w/v Benzamidine Hydrochloride (as an additive). Crystals were obtained by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method in dark conditions at 16 °C with a protein concentration of 30 mg/ml. For the serial femtosecond crystallographic experiments, microcrystals of the SaBphP2 PCM wild-type were prepared by mixing 60 mg/ml of protein with a 2:3 ratio of the same precipitant as listed above. The mixture was seeded with a 2 μl slurry of crushed macrocrystals prepared using glass beads from JenaBioscience and added to the sitting drops. After 4 days of incubation, the microcrystals were collected and concentrated to about 1011 crystals/ml and subsequently folded into a tenfold amount of nuclear grade grease.30,31 All steps in crystallization and tray observations were performed under green safety light.
X-ray crystallography and data collection
X-ray data were collected on macroscopic SaBphP2-wt and H275T mutant PCM crystals at Sector 19, ID-D (Structural Biology Center) of the Advanced Photon Source at cryogenic temperatures (100 K) and processed by HKL3000.32 Data at room temperature were collected from the SaBphP2 PCM-wt microcrystal–grease mixture at beamline BL233 at the Spring-8 Angstrom Compact free electron LAser (SACLA, RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Japan) during a crystal screening beamtime (6 h) in April 2019. Up to 200 μl of the mixture were transferred into an injector reservoir and extruded into air at ambient temperatures (293 K) through a 100 μm wide nozzle with a flow rate of about 0.2 μl/min. The stream of microcrystals was exposed to intense X-ray pulses of <10 fs duration with a 30 Hz repetition rate. Diffraction patterns were collected on a CCD detector with eight modules34 and analyzed with a user-friendly data-processing pipeline35 consisting of hit-finding with Cheetah36 and indexing and Monte Carlo integration by CrystFEL.37 The hit rate was about 35%. About 54% of diffraction patterns were successfully indexed. Both Mosflm and DirAx were used for indexing. The extracted partial intensities were merged to full reflection intensities using the “partialator” in CrystFEL. For data statistics, see supplementary material Table 1. The full intensities were converted to structure-factor amplitudes by software based on the CCP4 suite of programs.38
Structure determination
The SaBphP2 PCM crystalizes in space group P21 with a homodimer in the asymmetric unit (supplementary material Table 1). Initially, the SaBphP2 crystals were severely twinned, which compromised data quality and data interpretability. A molecular replacement solution could be found using the structure of the DrBphP PCM, subunit A, as a search model. Molecular replacement was performed using “Phaser.”39 Two solutions for the search model were found which orient to each other head to head like in a typical BphP. The molecular replacement solution was used to phase data to higher resolution (2.2 Å). An initial model was determined using the “Autobuild” option in the program PHENIX.40 This model substantially deviated from the molecular replacement model and showed for the first time long straight helices along the dimer interface of the SaBphP2 PCM. Subsequently, data to 1.9 Å and 2.2 Å for wild-type and the H275T mutant, respectively, were free of twinning due to the addition of benzamidine to the crystallization buffer. The initial model was completed by manually retracing some of the large loops in COOT41 and correcting the positions of the C-terminal helices. Data to 1.65 Å were finally collected on the SaBphP2-wt PCM. These data were used to refine a final model and determine the positions of more than 1100 water molecules. Our structure shows clear evidence for the sp3 hybridization of the ring A carbon number 2 after binding of the ring A vinyl to the Cys-13 sulfur (supplementary material Fig. 3, inset). The SaBphP2-wt model was used to refine the structures of the His275Thr mutant. Clear negative difference electron density on His-275 indicated that the crystals were grown from His275Thr mutant protein. Histidine was replaced with Threonine in the structure and refined. The room temperature SaBphP2-wt PCM structure was determined with the P2 model determined at 100 K as the initial model. After rigid body refinement and several rounds of restrained refinement in Phenix, R-factors settle below 20% and are acceptable (31%) even at 2.1 Å. Notably, in between the PHY domains of subunits A and B, strong positive electron density indicated the presence of a benzamidine molecule which was added to the crystallization buffer. Benzamidine cannot be identified in the cryotemperature structures and is most likely squeezed out between the PHY domains during the freezing process. The role of this additive in the crystal quality improvement now becomes clear. It intercalates between the PHY domains and stabilizes the structure and reduces structural heterogeneity. The structure of the benzamidine molecule was refined in a final step with that of the room temperature SaBphP2 PCM. Structural illustrations were generated with the programs PyMol (https://pymol.org/2/) and UCSF Chimera.42
RESULTS
Crystal structures of SaBphP2 at cryo and room temperatures
To gain a detailed understanding of the function of the S. aurantiaca phytochromes, we examined the crystal structures of SaBphP2 PCM at cryo and room temperatures. The wild-type protein crystallized in the dark in the Pr state in space group P21. Crystals grown from the PCM constructs diffracted to 1.65 Å resolution at 100 K and 2.1 Å at 293 K (supplementary material Table 1). In the SaBphP2 PCM crystals, subunits A and B form a noncrystallographic dimer. The structure of the SaBphP2 PCM displays the typical PAS-GAF-PHY domain architectures highlighted in yellow, green, and magenta in Fig. 1, respectively. The BV chromophore is bound to Cys13 close to the N-terminus. The N-terminal amino-acid sequence threads through a loop composed of GAF domain amino acids and forms the knot characteristic of all phytochrome structures.2,4 At around residue 340, the GAF domain transitions to the PHY domain. At residue 325, the helical structure in the SaBphP1 wild-type is kinked in both subunits [Fig. 1(b)]. This kink is absent in all SaBphP2 structures determined here.
The PHY domain harbors the sensory tongue [Fig. 1, amino acids 435–485, Figs. 3(a)–3(c)] that is in direct contact with the GAF domain. The sensory tongue reacts to the rotation of ring D caused by the isomerization of the C15=C16 double bond. It is transducing the light induced signal to the rest of the PHY and the output domains.8,21–23,43–47 Although the helical kink is absent in all three SaBphP2 structures reported here, the position of the sensory tongue remains essentially identical in wild-type PCM of SaBphP1 and SaBphP2.
The cryostructure of the His275Thr mutant is essentially identical to that of the wild-type (supplementary material Table 2), except at the location of the point mutation (supplementary material Fig. 4) where the hydrogen bond to the ring D carbonyl is absent. Given the high resolution of SaBphP2 wild-type structure, we clearly observe an intricate network of waters and conserved amino acids which stabilize the BV-chromophore in the Pr state. This network includes residues from including the PASDIP motif in the GAF domain and the PRXSF motif of the PHY domain [Figs. 2(c) and 3(d)]. Interestingly, not a single amino acid from the PHY domain forms direct contact with the BV chromophore. This is somewhat surprising knowing that the PHY domain has been reported as essential for formation of the Pfr state.20,48 Constructs lacking the PHY domain, known as chromophore-binding domains (CBDs), are partially photoactive. They show a much smaller shoulder in the Pfr form spectrum similar to constructs that lack the conserved Histidine which would (if present) stabilize the D-ring in the Pr state [Fig. 2(a) and supplementary material Fig. 2]. Similar photoactivity was observed for the SaBphP2 His275Thr mutant and the SaBphP1 wild-type protein (Thr289 instead), both lacking the conserved Histidine [Fig. 2(b)].5,14,18,48,49
We note that the PRXSF motif of the PHY domain undergoes significant structural changes from Pr to Pfr. The proline in this motif shifts from a position near ring A to being closer to the D-ring. This Pro specifically forms an important network of hydrogen bonds with the Y263 and the D-ring carbonyl upon isomerization of the C15=C16 double bond and formation of the stable Pfr form [Figs. 3(b) and 3(c)]. Interestingly, the only phytochrome that forms a Pnr (near-red) state upon red-light illumination, R. palustris RpBphP3, lacks the conserved Proline and has Threonine instead. A single Thr475Pro mutant in RpBphP3 generates a classical Pr/Pfr BphP that reversibly switches between Pr and Pfr states after 660 and 750 nm illumination, respectively.8,20
DISCUSSION
Dimer interface and its role in signaling
Crystal structures of the wild-type classical SaBphP2 determined at the highest resolution of any PCM to date reveal an intricate network of hydrogen bonds between conserved amino acids, neighboring water molecules, and BV which all stabilize the Pr state. To our surprise, the dimer interface structure of SaBphP2 is different from those of the related classical phytochromes such as DrBphP21,50 and RpBphP2.8 They all have an extensive helical kink at the dimer interface that is absent from SaBphP2. We superimposed the SaBphP2 structure onto the only x-ray structure of an intact BphP containing diguanylyl cyclase enzymatic domain [Fig. 4(a)]. Interestingly, SaBphP2 fit nearly perfectly onto the PCM of the Idiomarina BphP.46 Comparing the structures of SaBphP1 and SaBphP2 in Fig. 1, it is suggestive that if the kink is straightened out in P1, its structure would be essentially identical to the P2 structure. A similar kink is also observed in other BphP structures such as the DrBphP50,51 and to a smaller extent in RpBphP28 and is likely caused by crystal contacts and lattice constraints. By comparison with the Idiomarina full length structure (Fig. 4), a more biologically relevant PCM structure would be the one with straight helices as shown here for the SaBphP2.
Origin and propagation of the light signal
Upon Z to E isomerization and by rotation of the D-ring about the C15=C16 double bond, the conserved Histidine 275 must move. This destabilizes interactions with the neighboring amino acids and the water network in two ways, each involving a conserved Arg (Arg 157 and Arg 207) and a conserved Tyr (Tyr 161 and Tyr 201) as gateways of the signal (Fig. 5). One pathway is via the conserved R157 and consequently the main protein backbone. This involves the conserved Y161 preceding the important PASDIP motif and results in significant movement of D192. The second pathway is via the water network and R207. This disrupts the hydrogen bond with the conserved Y201, which stabilizes the B-ring propionate and ultimately changes the structure of the main protein backbone beyond the PASDIP motif. As a consequence, the salt bridge between Aspartate 192 in PASDIP and Arginine 457 from the PRXSF motif of the C-terminal PHY domain should be affected. Not surprisingly, this Arginine 457 is completely removed from the BV-binding pocket area in the Pfr state as observed in the classical DrBphP and bathy PaBphP. Instead of Arg 457, in the Pfr state, the Serine 459 from the same PRXSF motif forms a hydrogen bond with Asp 192 due to the newly formed helix in the sensory tongue region.
It is important to highlight that only a few amino acids after the PRXSF motif a short (C-terminal) helix is present that extends into a long helical backbone in intact (full length) phytochromes. This linker connects to the effector, enzymatic domain as seen in the intact structure of Idiomarina BphP. Gourinchas et al.45,46 introduced specific mutations in the coil-coil linker interface of Idiomarina BphP. This results in a heterogeneous BphP with one monomer in the Pr and other monomer in the Pfr state which is enzymatically active (but lost light regulation). This further supports that the dimer interface plays an essential role in the generation of the signal and the regulation of the enzymatic activity.
Histidine 275 and D-ring rotation
The conserved Histidine, although absent in some myxobacterial BphPs such as SaBphP1, stabilizes the Pr state by forming a H-bond with the D-ring carbonyl and the Pfr state by forming a H-bond with the C-ring propionate. Previously it has been suggested that protonation of His 275 and deprotonation of the C-ring propionate are critical in determining the reactivity of the BV-chromophore.49,52 Upon protonation, His 275 supports the movement of the C-ring propionate toward ring D, which leads to a rearrangement of the hydrogen bond network. However, there is an important Serine [Ser 287 in SaBphP1 or Ser 275 in PaBphP, Fig. 3(b)] that is in proximity to the conserved Histidine and that is found in some BphPs, particularly in those that lack Histidine and contain Threonine (Thr 289 in SaBphP1) or Glycine instead.5,49 In the bathy PaBphP, both Serine and Histidine stabilize the C-ring propionate through a hydrogen bond in the Pfr state,23 while in the SaBphP1 His289Thr mutant, both Serine and Histidine form a hydrogen bond to the D-ring carbonyl in the Pr state [Figs. 2(a), 2(b), and 3(a)–3(c)].5,14,18 In the SaBphP1 wild-type that lacks this conserved Histidine, Serine is 3.6 Å away from carbonyl of the D-ring with which it likely forms a H-bond. This is supported by the Pr/Pfr photoactivity of the SaBphP1 wild-type.5,14 Serine is absent in the SaBphP2 wild-type protein, and likewise, the mutation His275Thr diminishes the Pr/Pfr photoactivity (supplementary material Fig. 2), possibly as there is no stabilizing amino acid for the D-ring and C-ring propionate in the Pr and Pfr states.
SaBphP2 as a model for time-resolved crystallographic experiments
An ambitious goal is to observe the Z to E isomerization of the phytochromes by time-resolved crystallographic methods and characterize the transmission of signal from the BV to the enzymatic domain, ultimately through a distance of about 150 Å of protein, in real time. The SaBphP2 PCM is photoactive and displays a stable Pfr state that is long(er) lived in solution and also in the crystal [Fig. 6(a)]. Structural changes of the entire protein backbone from Pr to Pfr may be extensive [Fig. 6(b)]. Our spectra suggest that time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography experiments are feasible with various pump-probe time delays with SaBphP2 crystals spanning from the ultrafast to slower time scales. In this study, the SaBphP2 wild-type microcrystals diffracted to 2.1 Å at SACLA in nuclear grade grease [supplementary material Fig. 1(b)]. At this resolution, difference electron-density maps most likely contain chemically meaningful features even at low population transfer rates53–56 and can be used to identify and characterize the structures of at least some of the transient intermediates during the Pr to Pfr transition.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The results shown are derived from work performed at Argonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology Center at the Advanced Photon Source. Argonne is operated by UChicago Argonne, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11 357. The experiments at SACLA were performed at BL2 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal Nos. 2018A8055 and 2019A8007). This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Science and Technology Centers (STC) under Grant No. NSF-1231306 (“Biology with X-ray Lasers”). E.A.S. was supported by NSF-MCB-RUI 1413360, NSF-MCB-EAGER Grant No. 1839513, and NSF STC BioXFEL center award 6227. M.N. and L.A. training was supported in part by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Maximizing Access to Research Careers (MARC)-T34 GM105549 grant. The use of BioCARS was supported by NIH NIGMS under Grant No. P41 GM118217. This research was partially supported by the Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research [Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)] from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). Structural models as well as structure factor amplitudes were deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 6PTX, 6PTQ, and 6PU2 for the wild-type cryo, wild-type room temperature, and His275Thr mutant of SaBphP2 PCM, respectively.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Marius Schmidt, Email: .
Emina A. Stojković, Email: .
References
- 1. Jiang Z. Y., Swem L. R., Rushing B. G., Devanathan S., Tollin G., and Bauer C. E., “ Bacterial photoreceptor with similarity to photoactive yellow protein and plant phytochromes,” Science 285(5426), 406–409 (1999). 10.1126/science.285.5426.406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wagner J. R., Brunzelle J. S., Forest K. T., and Vierstra R. D., “ A light-sensing knot revealed by the structure of the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome,” Nature 438(7066), 325–331 (2005). 10.1038/nature04118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Legris M., Klose C., Burgie E. S., Rojas C. C., Neme M., Hiltbrunner A. et al. , “ Phytochrome B integrates light and temperature signals in Arabidopsis,” Science 354(6314), 897–900 (2016). 10.1126/science.aaf5656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Auldridge M. E. and Forest K. T., “ Bacterial phytochromes: More than meets the light,” Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 46(1), 67–88 (2011). 10.3109/10409238.2010.546389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Woitowich N. C., Halavaty A. S., Waltz P., Kupitz C., Valera J., Tracy G. et al. , “ Structural basis for light control of cell development revealed by crystal structures of a myxobacterial phytochrome,” Int. Union Crystallogr. J. 5(Pt. 5), 619–634 (2018). 10.1107/S2052252518010631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Otero L. H., Klinke S., Rinaldi J., Velazquez-Escobar F., Mroginski M. A., Fernandez Lopez M. et al. , “ Structure of the full-length bacteriophytochrome from the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris provides clues to its long-range signaling mechanism,” J. Mol. Biol. 428(19), 3702–3720 (2016). 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kojadinovic M., Laugraud A., Vuillet L., Fardoux J., Hannibal L., Adriano J. M. et al. , “ Dual role for a bacteriophytochrome in the bioenergetic control of Rhodopseudomonas palustris: Enhancement of photosystem synthesis and limitation of respiration,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1777(2), 163–172 (2008). 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Yang X., Stojkovic E. A., Ozarowski W. B., Kuk J., Davydova E., and Moffat K., “ Light signaling mechanism of two tandem bacteriophytochromes,” Structure 23(7), 1179–1189 (2015). 10.1016/j.str.2015.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Toh K. C., Stojkovic E. A., van Stokkum I. H. M., Moffat K., and Kennis J. T., “ The photochemistry of bacteriophytochrome: Key to its use as a deep-tissue fluorescence probe,” Biophys. J. 100(3), 174 (2011). 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.117421190669 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Davis S. J., Vener A. V., and Vierstra R. D., “ Bacteriophytochromes: Phytochrome-like photoreceptors from nonphotosynthetic eubacteria,” Science 286(5449), 2517–2520 (1999). 10.1126/science.286.5449.2517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bai Y., Rottwinkel G., Feng J., Liu Y., and Lamparter T., “ Bacteriophytochromes control conjugation in Agrobacterium fabrum,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 161, 192–199 (2016). 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. McGrane R. and Beattie G. A., “ Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a regulates multiple stages of plant colonization via the bacteriophytochrome BphP1,” mBio 8(5), e01178-17 (2017). 10.1128/mBio.01178-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Barkovits K., Schubert B., Heine S., Scheer M., and Frankenberg-Dinkel N., “ Function of the bacteriophytochrome BphP in the RpoS/Las quorum-sensing network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Microbiology 157(Pt. 6), 1651–1664 (2011). 10.1099/mic.0.049007-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mathes T., Ravensbergen J., Kloz M., Gleichmann T., Gallagher K. D., Woitowich N. C. et al. , “ Femto- to microsecond photodynamics of an unusual bacteriophytochrome,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(2), 239–243 (2015). 10.1021/jz502408n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Qualls G. T., Stephens K., and White D., “ Light-stimulated morphogenesis in the fruiting myxobacterium Stigmatella aurantiaca,” Science 201(4354), 444–445 (1978). 10.1126/science.96528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Qualls G. T., Stephens K., and White D., “ Morphogenetic movements and multicellular development in the fruiting myxobacterium, Stigmatella aurantiaca,” Dev. Biol. 66(1), 270–274 (1978). 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90291-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. White D., W. Shropshire, Jr. , and Stephens K., “ Photocontrol of development by Stigmatella aurantiaca,” J. Bacteriol. 142(3), 1023–1024 (1980). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bjorling A., Berntsson O., Takala H., Gallagher K. D., Patel H., Gustavsson E. et al. , “ Ubiquitous structural signaling in bacterial phytochromes,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(17), 3379–3383 (2015). 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rockwell N. C., Shang L., Martin S. S., and Lagarias J. C., “ Distinct classes of red/far-red photochemistry within the phytochrome superfamily,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106(15), 6123–6127 (2009). 10.1073/pnas.0902370106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yang X., Stojkovic E. A., Kuk J., and Moffat K., “ Crystal structure of the chromophore binding domain of an unusual bacteriophytochrome, RpBphP3, reveals residues that modulate photoconversion,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104(30), 12571–12576 (2007). 10.1073/pnas.0701737104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Takala H., Bjorling A., Berntsson O., Lehtivuori H., Niebling S., Hoernke M. et al. , “ Signal amplification and transduction in phytochrome photosensors,” Nature 509(7499), 245–248 (2014). 10.1038/nature13310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Burgie E. S., Zhang J., and Vierstra R. D., “ Crystal structure of Deinococcus phytochrome in the photoactivated state reveals a cascade of structural rearrangements during photoconversion,” Structure 24(3), 448–457 (2016). 10.1016/j.str.2016.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yang X., Kuk J., and Moffat K., “ Crystal structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophytochrome: Photoconversion and signal transduction,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105(38), 14715–14720 (2008). 10.1073/pnas.0806718105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Inomata K., Noack S., Hammam M. A., Khawn H., Kinoshita H., Murata Y. et al. , “ Assembly of synthetic locked chromophores with agrobacterium phytochromes Agp1 and Agp2,” J. Biol. Chem. 281(38), 28162–28173 (2006). 10.1074/jbc.M603983200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Krieger A., Molina I., Oberpichler I., Michael N., and Lamparter T., “ Spectral properties of phytochrome Agp2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens are specifically modified by a compound of the cell extract,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 93(1), 16–22 (2008). 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Yang X., Ren Z., Kuk J., and Moffat K., “ Temperature-scan cryocrystallography reveals reaction intermediates in bacteriophytochrome,” Nature 479(7373), 428–432 (2011). 10.1038/nature10506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Claesson E., Wahlgren W. Y., Takala H., Pandey S., Castillon L., Kuznetsova V. et al. , “ The primary structural photoresponse of phytochrome proteins captured by a femtosecond X-ray laser,” Nat. Chem. (submitted). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Shu X., Royant A., Lin M. Z., Aguilera T. A., Lev-Ram V., Steinbach P. A. et al. , “ Mammalian expression of infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from a bacterial phytochrome,” Science 324(5928), 804–807 (2009). 10.1126/science.1168683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Shcherbakova D. M., Baloban M., Emelyanov A. V., Brenowitz M., Guo P., and Verkhusha V. V., “ Bright monomeric near-infrared fluorescent proteins as tags and biosensors for multiscale imaging,” Nat. Commun. 7, 12405 (2016). 10.1038/ncomms12405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sugahara M., Mizohata E., Nango E., Suzuki M., Tanaka T., Masudala T. et al. , “ Grease matrix as a versatile carrier of proteins for serial crystallography,” Nat. Methods 12(1), 61–63 (2015). 10.1038/nmeth.3172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sugahara M., Nakane T., Masuda T., Suzuki M., Inoue S., Song C. et al. , “ Hydroxyethyl cellulose matrix applied to serial crystallography,” Sci. Rep. 7(1), 703 (2017). 10.1038/s41598-017-00761-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Minor W., Cymborowski M., Otwinowski Z., and Chruszcz M., “ HKL-3000: The integration of data reduction and structure solution-from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 62, 859–866 (2006). 10.1107/S0907444906019949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Tono K., Hara T., Yabashi M., and Tanaka H., “ Multiple-beamline operation of SACLA,” J. Synchrotron Radiat. 26(Pt. 2), 595–602 (2019). 10.1107/S1600577519001607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kameshima T., Ono S., Kudo T., Ozaki K., Kirihara Y., Kobayashi K. et al. , “ Development of an X-ray pixel detector with multi-port charge-coupled device for X-ray free-electron laser experiments,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85(3), 033110 (2014). 10.1063/1.4867668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Nakane T., Joti Y., Tono K., Yabashi M., Nango E., Iwata S. et al. , “ Data processing pipeline for serial femtosecond crystallography at SACLA,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1035–1041 (2016). 10.1107/S1600576716005720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Barty A., Kirian R. A., Maia F., Hantke M., Yoon C. H., White T. A. et al. , “ Cheetah: Software for high-throughput reduction and analysis of serial femtosecond X-ray diffraction data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 47, 1118–1131 (2014). 10.1107/S1600576714007626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. White T. A., Mariani V., Brehm W., Yefanov O., Barty A., Beyerlein K. R. et al. , “ Recent developments in CrystFEL,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49(Pt. 2), 680–689 (2016). 10.1107/S1600576716004751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Winn M. D., Ballard C. C., Cowtan K. D., Dodson E. J., Emsley P., Evans P. R. et al. , “ Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 67, 235–242 (2011). 10.1107/S0907444910045749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Oeffner R. D., Bunkoczi G., McCoy A. J., and Read R. J., “ Improved estimates of coordinate error for molecular replacement,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 69, 2209–2215 (2013). 10.1107/S0907444913023512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Adams P. D., Afonine P. V., Bunkoczi G., Chen V. B., Davis I. W., Echols N. et al. , “ PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 66(Pt. 2), 213–221 (2010). 10.1107/S0907444909052925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W. G., and Cowtan K., “ Features and development of Coot,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 66(Pt. 4), 486–501 (2010). 10.1107/S0907444910007493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Pettersen E. F., Goddard T. D., Huang C. C., Couch G. S., Greenblatt D. M., Meng E. C. et al. , “ UCSF chimera: A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis,” J. Comput. Chem. 25(13), 1605–1612 (2004). 10.1002/jcc.20084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Essen L. O., Mailliet J., and Hughes J., “ The structure of a complete phytochrome sensory module in the Pr ground state,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105(38), 14709–14714 (2008). 10.1073/pnas.0806477105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Anders K., Daminelli-Widany G., Mroginski M. A., von Stetten D., and Essen L. O., “ Structure of the cyanobacterial phytochrome 2 photosensor implies a tryptophan switch for phytochrome signaling,” J. Biol. Chem. 288(50), 35714–35725 (2013). 10.1074/jbc.M113.510461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gourinchas G., Heintz U., and Winkler A., “ Asymmetric activation mechanism of a homodimeric red light-regulated photoreceptor,” Elife 7, e34815 (2018). 10.7554/eLife.34815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Gourinchas G., Etzl S., Gobl C., Vide U., Madl T., and Winkler A., “ Long-range allosteric signaling in red light-regulated diguanylyl cyclases,” Sci. Adv. 3(3), e1602498 (2017). 10.1126/sciadv.1602498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Stojkovic E. A., Toh K. C., Alexandre M. T., Baclayon M., Moffat K., and Kennis J. T., “ FTIR spectroscopy revealing light-dependent refolding of the conserved tongue region of bacteriophytochrome,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5(15), 2512–2515 (2014). 10.1021/jz501189t [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wagner J. R., Zhang J., von Stetten D., Gunther M., Murgida D. H., Mroginski M. A. et al. , “ Mutational analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans bacteriophytochrome reveals key amino acids necessary for the photochromicity and proton exchange cycle of phytochromes,” J. Biol. Chem. 283(18), 12212–12226 (2008). 10.1074/jbc.M709355200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lenngren N., Edlund P., Takala H., Stucki-Buchli B., Rumfeldt J., Peshev I. et al. , “ Coordination of the biliverdin D-ring in bacteriophytochromes,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20(27), 18216–18225 (2018). 10.1039/C8CP01696H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Burgie E. S., Bussell A. N., Walker J. M., Dubiel K., and Vierstra R. D., “ Crystal structure of the photosensing module from a red/far-red light-absorbing plant phytochrome,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111(28), 10179–10184 (2014). 10.1073/pnas.1403096111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Takala H., Niebling S., Berntsson O., Bjorling A., Lehtivuori H., Hakkanen H. et al. , “ Light-induced structural changes in a monomeric bacteriophytochrome,” Struct. Dyn. 3(5), 054701 (2016). 10.1063/1.4961911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Schmidt A., Sauthof L., Szczepek M., Lopez M. F., Escobar F. V., Qureshi B. M. et al. , “ Structural snapshot of a bacterial phytochrome in its functional intermediate state,” Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4912 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-07392-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Tenboer J., Basu S., Zatsepin N., Pande K., Milathianaki D., Frank M. et al. , “ Time-resolved serial crystallography captures high-resolution intermediates of photoactive yellow protein,” Science 346(6214), 1242–1246 (2014). 10.1126/science.1259357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Pande K., Hutchison C. D. M., Groenhof G., Aquila A., Robinson J. S., Tenboer J. et al. , “ Femtosecond structural dynamics drives the trans/cis isomerization in photoactive yellow protein,” Science 352(6286), 725–729 (2016). 10.1126/science.aad5081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Schmidt M., Srajer V., Henning R., Ihee H., Purwar N., Tenboer J. et al. , “ Protein energy landscapes determined by five-dimensional crystallography,” Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 69(Pt 12), 2534–2542 (2013). 10.1107/S0907444913025997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jung Y. O., Lee J. H., Kim J., Schmidt M., Moffat K., Srajer V. et al. , “ Volume-conserving trans-cis isomerization pathways in photoactive yellow protein visualized by picosecond X-ray crystallography,” Nat. Chem. 5(3), 212–220 (2013). 10.1038/nchem.1565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.