Skip to main content
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) logoLink to Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
. 2019 Aug 21;19(17):3644. doi: 10.3390/s19173644

Toward the Required Detection Limits for Volatile Organic Constituents in Marine Environments with Infrared Evanescent Field Chemical Sensors

Carina Dettenrieder 1, Yosef Raichlin 2, Abraham Katzir 3, Boris Mizaikoff 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC6749396  PMID: 31438601

Abstract

A portable sensor system for the simultaneous detection of multiple environmentally relevant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in real seawater based on Fourier transform infrared fiber-optic evanescent wave spectroscopy (FT-IR-FEWS) was developed. A cylindrical silver halide (AgX) fiber with an ethylene/propylene copolymer (E/P-co) coated flattened segment was used as an active optical transducer. The polymer membrane enriches the hydrophobic analytes, while water is effectively excluded from the penetration depth of the evanescent field. Determination of multicomponent mixtures (i.e., 10 VOCs in real-world seawater samples) collected in Arcachon Bay, France revealed a high accuracy and reproducibility with detection limits down to 560 ppb. The measurement showed no significant influence from changing water conditions (e.g., salinity, turbidity, and temperature or other interfering substances). The time constants for 90% saturation of the polymer ranged from 20 to 60 min. The sensor system is capable of being transported for on-site monitoring of environmental pollutants in aqueous matrices with efficient long-term stability, thus showing great potential to be utilized as an early warning system.

Keywords: mid-infrared, fiber-optic evanescent field sensor, optical chemical sensor, chemosensor, IR sensor, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, silver halide fiber, polymer coating, enrichment, environmental monitoring, volatile organic compound, VOC

1. Introduction

Increasing industrialization and population of coastal regions and the use of the ocean as a dumping ground for contaminated dredged material, sewage sludge, industrial, and domestic waste has led to increased pollution of the oceans, which is one of the most important environmental problems [1]. In particular, organic contaminants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are the most commonly detected pollutants [2]. VOCs are in part carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic, and may damage the health of humans and the marine ecosystem [3]. The widespread use of VOCs in the manufacturing and handling of paints, solvents, adhesives, fuels, pharmaceuticals, deodorants, fumigants, and refrigerants or leaking underground pipelines, solvent storage vessels, landfill, and manufacturing effluents has led to releases into the environment [4,5,6]. More than half of the total number of identified substances originating from sea-based sources results from offshore gas/oil activities (39%) and shipping (32%) [1]. Maritime traffic on the world’s seas, with about 215 million tons of chemicals in 2015, has led to discharges, even though this is illegal [1].

Certain VOCs may persist in groundwater and move into drinking water supplies. Therefore, VOCs have been detected in aqueous matrices such as in ground and surface waters [7,8,9,10,11], drinking water [12,13,14,15,16], river water [17,18,19], and seawater [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In general, organic pollutants that might have a toxicological impact have been found in many marine areas (e.g., northwestern Mediterranean Sea, the Adriatic Sea, the harbor of Naples, Haifa, the Saronikos Gulf, the Sea of Marmara, and the northwestern Black Sea) [29,30]. Of all of the substances released into seawater, most contaminants originate from offshore oil and gas operations [1]. For example, as of September 2015, over 528,000 releases from underground petroleum storage tanks and pipes have been reported since the underground storage tank program was implemented [31]. Every year, 10%–15% of the oil entering the oceans, and thus VOCs, are from oil tanker accidents [1].

Therefore, the protection of global waters and the reduction of discharges, emissions, and losses of hazardous substances and maintaining public health are of substantial communal, political, legislative, and economic interest for several commissions such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the European Analytical Quality Control in support of the Water Framework Directive for sustained health of the marine ecosystem.

In order to protect marine oceans and the surrounding ecosystems, monitoring hazardous pollutants in seawater with an adequate method is necessary. Conventionally, the detection of VOCs is performed using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which offers high sensitivity in the low ppb range. For sample preconcentration, purge-and-trap [32,33] or solid-phase microextraction [34,35,36] are mostly used. Furthermore, spectroscopy-based methods such as ultra-violet (UV) [37,38], Raman [39], near infrared [40], and fluorescence [41] spectroscopy have been applied for VOC detection. However, these methods are expensive and time-consuming due the bulky instrumentation required, therefore, the sample is collected discontinuously and transported to a well-equipped laboratory. Sample pretreatment steps (purification and extraction) may lead to erroneous results due to sample losses from the volatile nature of the analytes to be investigated [42]. Therefore, skilled personnel are required during this work.

In particular, detection in seawater is challenging due to its complex matrix such as high ionic strength and the presence of marine humus, resulting from organic matter like cellular debris, humic acids, and metabolic products as well as other interfering dissolved organic substances and bio-organisms. The diversity of the analytes and the permanent changing concentrations and conditions both spatially and temporally that are related to estuaries or effluents makes detection challenging. Consequently, a rapid in situ and real-time screening sensor for on-site measurement of VOCs in aqueous matrices is envisaged such as infrared attenuated total reflection (IR-ATR) spectroscopy.

IR-ATR spectroscopy has the advantage of being a non-destructive method, and can analyze pollutants in situ and in real-time since sampling and the sample pre-treatment steps are not necessary. In the mid-infrared (MIR) spectral range (3–20 µm), well-structured substance-specific absorption bands are caused, in particular, in the so-called fingerprint region (below 1100 cm−1) by the excitation of the fundamental vibrational states of the analyte molecules.

The principle of ATR is exemplarily illustrated with AgX fiber as an optical transducer in Figure 1. The light is totally internal reflected at both sides of the waveguide at the interface to the surrounding medium (E/P-co), if the incident IR beam is at an angle of incidence θi larger than the critical angle θc. The refractive index of the waveguide n1 (i.e., the AgX fiber) has to be larger than the refractive index of the surrounding medium n2 (E/P-co polymer coating), as defined by Snell’s law:

θC=arcsinn2n1 (1)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic attenuated total reflection principle of an E/P-co polymer coated AgX fiber. The number of total internal reflections is increased within the flattened section of the AgX fiber. Analyte molecules in an aqueous solution (dark blue) enrich into the polymer layer (light blue) and are detected within the penetration depth dp of the exponentially decaying evanescent field. θi is the angle of incident light, n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the AgX fiber and E/P-co polymer, respectively, E is the intensity of the evanescent field depending on the distance x.

The theoretical number of total internal reflections N within a waveguide can be calculated with the following equation:

N=La=Ldtanθi (2)

where L and d are the length of the sensing region and the waveguide thickness, respectively. a is the distance between each reflection. By decreasing the waveguide thickness, the angle of incidence changes, leading to an increased penetration depth and number of total internal reflections, and therefore, an increased sensitivity. Hence, a segment of cylindrical AgX fiber (700 µm) was press tapered to a diameter of 150 µm.

Due to interference of the incident and reflected light, an evanescent field is generated that penetrates into the polymer layer depending on the wavelength of the incident beam λ, the refractive indices n1=2.2 (AgX fiber) and n2=1.48 (E/Pco), and the angle of incidence θi=45°:

dp=λ2πn12sin2θin22 (3)

The maximum penetration depth at 12.65 µm (790 cm−1) was calculated as 4.20 µm. The intensity of the evanescent field decays exponentially with the distance x:

E(x)=E0exp(xdp) (4)

where E0 is the intensity at the interface.

Conventionally, chalcogenides glasses, heavy metal fluorides, tellurium halides, and AgX are used as fiber-optic materials [43]. AgX fibers (AgClxBr1−x; 0<x<1) are among the most promising materials for MIR sensing applications as they have the advantage of being flexible, and transparent in the entire MIR spectral range, depending on its composition [44]. Cylindrical fibers [45,46,47], flattened fibers [48], and flattened fibers with cylindrical extensions on both ends [49,50,51] have already been investigated. In this study, a planar AgX fiber with cylindrical extension was used since it has been reported to have enhanced absorbance signals when compared to cylindrical fibers while maintaining good properties of incoupling the IR radiation [51].

The surface of the waveguide (i.e., flattened segment) was coated with a polymer membrane acting as a solid-phase extractor to enable the continuous measurement of pollutants over a long period of time. The hydrophobic polymer only enriches hydrophobic analytes (i.e., pollutants), which interact with the generated evanescent field. In MIR spectroscopy, high water absorption bands interfere with the specific absorption features of the analytes. Due to the hydrophobic nature of the polymer membrane, water is effectively excluded from the evanescent field. This enables MIR spectroscopy sensing in aqueous matrices with an increased sensitivity. At the same time, the polymer coating prevents the AgX fiber from being exposed to UV radiation and chloride ions. Otherwise, a water soluble silver complex [AgCl2] is formed, and degradation of the optical fiber will take place [52]. The thickness of the coating layer must exceed the penetration depth of the evanescent field in order to efficiently restrain the water molecules. However, too thick membranes will lead to long enrichment times to obtain steady-state conditions. A wide variety of polymeric materials for the enrichment membrane have already been investigated including polyisobutylene (PIB) [53,54,55], low-density polyethylene (LDPE) [56], E/P-co [49,57], Teflon® AF [58,59], or poly(dimethylsiloxane) [59,60]. Based on the superior enrichment properties due to its amorphous nature, and therefore, its high free volume, the E/P-co polymer was used within this study. The feasibility of MIR-FEWS for pollutant monitoring in aqueous matrices (i.e., water and artificial seawater) through the use of a polymer coated polycrystalline AgX fiber as a sensing element has already been demonstrated by several research teams [47,49,50,61,62,63,64,65]. However, these studies have shown simultaneous detection up to six (chlorinated) hydrocarbons in water using a liquid nitrogen-cooled detector. Due to the liquid nitrogen, this is not applicable for in-field environmental analysis. Kraft et al. [61] have demonstrated the detection of five VOCs in artificial seawater through the use of a Stirling-cooled detector. Salinity, turbidity, inorganic ions, and marine humus do not influence the performance of the sensor. Additionally, they investigated cross interferences ranging from highly hydrophobic (n-hexane) to hydrophilic (methanol and pyridine) substances, showing that enrichment factors and sensor response remained constant [66].

The present study describes a field-deployable portable IR spectroscopic sensor system developed during a European Union project (SCHeMA, “Integrated in situ chemical mapping probes”, Grant Agreement Number 614002 [67] toward the required detection limits for continuous in situ and real-time environmental pollution monitoring, especially regarding detection in complex matrices (i.e., real seawater). Therefore, implementation as a “threshold alarm sensor” was envisaged. The MIR sensor system is capable of analyzing simultaneously multiple VOCs (i.e., environmental pollutants). Therefore, a mixture of ten VOCs in real seawater collected from Arcachon Bay, France were successfully qualified and quantified. Detection limits in the low ppm region with a rapid and reversible enrichment were achieved. Therefore, the developed MIR sensor system facilitates a variety of applications including wastewater or effluent monitoring, underground fuel storage tanks and pipeline monitoring, and controlling drinking water supplies directly on-site from the point of intake and discharge.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Tetrachloroethylene (TeCE, 99.9%), (+)-3-carene (CAR, 90%), p-xylene (pXYL, 99%), ethylbenzene (EB, 99%), 1,2-dichlorobenzene (12DCB, 98%), 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (124TCB, 98%), and methanol (99.8%) were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Myrcene (MYR, 90%) and p-cymene (pCYM, 99%) were obtained from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). E/P-co (60:40) was supplied by Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Trichloroethylene (TCE, 99.5%) and 1,3-dichlorobenzene (13DCB, 98%) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Munich, Germany). n-hexane was obtained from Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany). The chemicals were used without further purification.

The flattened AgX fiber (AgCl0.3Br0.7) with cylindrical extensions used as a sensing element was provided by the research team of Abraham Katzir (Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel). The dimensions were as follows: flattened section: length of 45 mm, width of 5 mm, and thickness of 150 µm; cylindrical end facets: length: 15 mm and diameter: 0.7 mm. The AgX fiber was located inside a flow cell produced by the machine shop of Ulm University. According to Equation (4), the evanescent field intensity dependent on the distance from the waveguide surface was calculated. Therefore, E0 was measured using a thermopile detector (Gentec-EO, Quebec City, QC, Canada). The intensity of the evanescent field at the penetration depth of 4.2 µm (compared to Equation (3)) at each internal reflection was reduced to 37% of E0.

2.2. Polymer Coating

A total of 0.5 g of the E/P-co polymer was dissolved in n-hexane under reflux for 30 min. The hot solution was dip-coated with an Eppendorf pipette onto both sides of the AgX fiber, 80 µL, each. The polymer film produced was kept at room temperature for at least 2 h until the solvent. The cross-section of the polymer-coated (on top and bottom) AgX fiber using scanning electron microscopy is illustrated in Figure 2. A uniform layer was obtained using the dip-coating method with an Eppendorf pipette.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Scanning electron microscopy image of the cross-section of a AgX fiber with the E/P-co polymer coating on the top and bottom revealing a uniform layer.

With differential weighing, the membrane thickness was calculated as 13.7 ± 0.2 µm with differential weighing [54]:

d=mPolymerρPolymer·A (5)

where d= the E/P-co thickness, mPolymer= the mass of the polymer (obtained from weighing the AgX fiber before and after the coating process), ρPolymer= density of the polymer membrane (0.86 g/cm3) [56], and A= the coated surface area (2.25 cm2).

Before starting the first measurement, the E/P-co polymer coating was equilibrated to water since a small amount diffuses into the membrane, thus causing a baseline shift. Due to the water absorption, a baseline shift occurs. The water diffusion reached equilibrium after at least 24 h of exposure.

2.3. Sample Preparation

All analytes (TeCE, TCE, MYR, CAR, pXYL, EB, 12DCB, 13DCB, 124TCB, and pCYM) were dissolved in pure methanol in 20 mL headspace vials resulting in a final concentration of 2000 ppm each. The stock solution was freshly produced daily to ensure no evaporation loss. Sample solutions were prepared prior to the measurements. Therefore, a certain quantity of stock solution was dissolved in the seawater, which was directly collected from Arcachon Bay (Arcachon, France). The amount of methanol in the sample solution, which acted as a solubility mediator, was 1% (v/v). As already described by M. Kraft and B. Mizaikoff [66], spectral interferences did not occur.

2.4. Instrumentation and Data Processing

A compact Alpha FT-IR spectrometer in the OEM (original equipment manufacturer) version (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) was used as the MIR light source. The IR radiation was focused via a gold-coated elliptical mirror (Thorlabs, Dachau, Germany) and an off-axis parabolic mirror (OAPM, focal length: 25.4 mm, Thorlabs, Dachau, Germany) on the cylindrical end facet of the AgX fiber, which acted as the internal reflection element. Two consecutive OAPMs (Thorlabs, focal length: 25.4 mm and 50.8 mm, Dachau, Germany) were used to focus the IR radiation emanating from the AgX fiber onto a thermoelectrically-cooled MCT (mercury cadmium telluride) detector (Vigo, Poland). For system control and data evaluation, an industrial computer (NST GmbH) was used. All components were mounted on top of an optical breadboard. A schematic and optical image of the MIR-FEWS sensor system is shown in Figure 3. The entire sensor system was reduced in size to 650 × 210 mm2 and fit inside a stainless-steel housing for transportation for on-site measurements (i.e., in this study, at Arcachon Bay, France). The sample solution was pumped via polytetrafluoroethylene tubes and tubing connectors inside and out of the flow cell using a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow, Cornwall, UK) at a flow rate of 3.2 mL/min. For the rinsing process, the flow rate was set to 4.0 mL/min for a faster regeneration of the polymer coating.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Schematic of the experimental setup showing the respective components, FT-IR (Fourier transform infrared) spectrometer, coupling optics, thermoelectrically-cooled MCT detector, and µ-flow cell. The latter included the waveguide element (i.e., AgX fiber). (b) Entire miniaturized MIR sensor system (size: 650 × 210 mm2) comprising of the optical components, a small computer for data generation and analysis, and a peristaltic pump.

Spectra were recorded in the spectral range from 4000 to 790 cm−1 with a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1, and 50 scans were averaged per spectrum. Clean seawater from Arcachon Bay was used as the background spectrum. A manual baseline correction was applied to the obtained spectra and evaluated via the univariate method (i.e., peak area analysis). The integration limits are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Integration limits used for the univariate data evaluation (i.e., peak area analysis).

Substance Peak Area (cm−1)
13DCB 1583–1574
pCYM 1521–1506
EB 1498–1489
12DCB 1437–1431
124TCB 104–1028
CAR 1002–981
TCE 939–926
TeCE 915–899
MYR 898–883
pXYL 803–793

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Pollutants in Seawater

The AgX fiber was coated with the hydrophobic E/P-co polymer (thickness: 13.7 ± 0.2 µm) in order to enrich the hydrophobic pollutants dissolved in seawater. Therefore, molecules within the penetration depth of the evanescent field were simultaneously detected. Figure 4 shows an exemplary IR absorption spectrum of 10 analytes in seawater with a concentration of 25 ppm each, after being enriched into the polymer membrane. The spectrum was recorded after an enrichment time of 80 min. Each analyte featured one or more clearly visible characteristic absorption bands in the fingerprint region due to the molecule-specific C–H and C–Cl stretching and deformation vibrations. The IR peaks were labeled for clarity: MYR (1594 cm−1 and 892 cm−1), 13DCB (1577 cm−1 and 1412 cm−1), pCYM (1515 cm−1 and 815 cm−1), EB (1495 cm−1), 124TCB (1457 cm−1, 1094 cm−1, 1035 cm−1, and 868 cm−1), 12DCB (1434 cm−1), CAR (1384 cm−1 and 989 cm−1), TCE (931 cm−1), TeCE (910 cm−1), and pXYL (795 cm−1). Therefore, a multivariate data evaluation was not required. The absorption peaks were consistent in the frequency positions when compared to measurements from the literature performed in deionized water [68]. For univariate data analysis, one peak for each analyte was selected (compare Table 2). The IR spectrum of the E/P-co polymer revealed an absorption band at 804 cm−1 [54]. This peak overlapped the peak occurring from pCYM at 815 cm−1, therefore, the peak at 1515 cm−1 was used for evaluation. Spectral interferences from water absorption bands did not occur (i.e., the polymer coating successfully restrains the water from the evanescent field). Furthermore, the complex and corrosive seawater matrix with its variety of organic matter did not influence the IR signature. Macro-molecules (e.g., humic acids) were not enriched into the E/P-co polymer due to steric hindrance.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Infrared (IR) absorption spectrum of 10 VOCs (i.e., MYR, 13DCB, pCYM, EB, 124TCB, 12DCB, CAR, TCE, TeCE, and pXYL) in seawater measured simultaneously in a concentration of 25 ppm each. The spectrum was recorded after 80 min of enrichment.

Table 2.

Summary of calibration functions (i.e., linear fit, r2-value, LOD and LOQ derived from peak area analysis) over a concentration range from 1 ppm to 25 ppm.

VOC Wavenumber (cm−1) Linear Fit r2 LOD (ppm) LOQ (ppm)
13DCB 1577 0.03046x+0.06101 0.99458 1.385±0.030 4.618±0.101
pCYM 1515 0.03421x+0.05186 0.9882 0.669±0.011 2.229±0.035
EB 1495 0.00428x+0.01347 0.99631 1.474±0.045 4.914±0.150
12DCB 1434 0.00414x+0.00982 0.99958 5.943±0.173 19.809±0.576
124TCB 1035 0.04119x+0.01743 0.99912 0.639±0.006 2.131±0.020
CAR 989 0.02025x0.01699 0.99918 1.219±0.020 4.064±0.068
TCE 931 0.01358x0.01522 0.97704 1.074±0.035 3.581±0.117
TeCE 910 0.07841x+0.15213 0.98604 0.560±0.014 1.866±0.047
MYR 892 0.01831x+0.06601 0.98826 2.262±0.075 7.540±0.251
pXYL 795 0.02739x0.0645 0.97921 4.762±0.307 15.873±1.024

3.2. Enrichment Process

The partitioning process (i.e., integrated peak area over the enrichment time) of TeCE into the amorphous E/P-co polymer is exemplarily illustrated in Figure 5 for 10 ppm. For all analytes at the respective concentration, similar enrichment functions could be obtained. The t90-value (i.e., the time until 90% of saturation was achieved), ranged from 3 to 60 min. However, the t90-value of most of the analytes was around 30 min.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Exemplary diffusion curve of TeCE at a concentration of 10 ppm in an E/P-co polymer layer at 910 cm−1. The enrichment process was fitted with a limited growth function.

3.3. Regeneration

The polymer membrane can be regenerated by flushing a mixture of methanol and clean seawater (20:80, v/v) through the flow cell. In order to achieve fast regeneration, the flow rate was set to maximum speed (i.e., 4 mL/min). The regeneration process was performed until the peak area decreased to the initial peak area. The diffusion out of the polymer layer over the time is exemplarily shown for TCE in Figure 6. The membrane was fully regenerated after approx. 20 min. Depending on the type of analyte, the regeneration process was longer (50–80 min). The methanol fraction in the rinsing solution did not destroy the E/P-co polymer layer. In order to reduce the time needed for regeneration, the methanol fraction in the mixture can be increased. Therefore, the hydrophobic polymer could be used for multiple measurement cycles, thus maintaining the enrichment properties and protection of the AgX fiber against the corrosive chloride ions contained in seawater.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Exemplary regeneration process of TCE at 931 cm−1. The polymer layer was completely regenerated after approx. 20 min.

3.4. Sensor Calibration

In Figure 7, the established calibration functions of all simultaneously detected VOCs in seawater obtained with the developed IR evanescent field sensor are shown. To achieve optimum accuracy, the data were evaluated using the equilibrium method. Therefore, the equilibrium concentration was used to obtain the calibration functions. In order to ensure steady-state conditions were achieved, 10 repetitive measurements were executed after 80 min of enrichment time. The concentration for the respective analyte ranged from 1 ppm to 25 ppm. Calibration functions were obtained by plotting the peak area versus the respective concentration and applying a linear fit.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Figure 7

Established calibration functions of the simultaneously determined volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in seawater by the developed MIR chemical sensor. The concentration ranged from 1 to 25 ppm. Data points were obtained by peak area integration. (a) 13DCB, (b) pCYM, (c) EB, (d) 12DCB, (e) 124TCB, (f) CAR, (g) TCE, (h) TeCE, (i) MYR, and (j) pXYL.

All obtained linear fits resulted in r2-values (goodness of the fit) greater than 0.97. For 12DCB, 124TCB, and CAR, the r2-value was even higher than 0.999. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) through the 3σ- or 10σ-criteria, respectively (3- or 10-times the standard deviation of the smallest concentration value measured). Table 2 summarizes the calibration parameters, LOD, and LOQ for each analyte. Ten VOCs were successfully measured qualitatively and quantitatively in seawater. This is the first time that ten VOCs were simultaneously detected with the resulting detection limits in the low-ppm to ppb concentration range by applying only 50 averaged scans. The quantification of pXYL might be unreliable due to the cut-off wavelength of the thermoelectric MCT detector at 793 cm−1, however, pXYL can be determined qualitatively. The r2-value, LOD, and LOQ can be further decreased by increasing the number of averaged scans. However, the main purpose of the developed MIR sensor is the rapid detection of VOCs in seawater (i.e., threshold alarm sensor), hence the number of averaged scans for measurements was reduced, thus reducing the time for a single measurement. The use of a liquid nitrogen-cooled MCT detector would lead to enhanced sensitivity as already demonstrated by several research teams [49,50,56,57,63]. However, liquid nitrogen is not applicable for environmental analysis. Changes in salinity (28–34 PSU), turbidity (2.2–14 NTU), temperature (17–22 °C), and pH (7.8–8) over the measurement period revealed no significant influence on the sensor performance, as already described by Mizaikoff [69].

3.5. Reproducibility

The reproducibility of the developed MIR sensor system was investigated through five repetitive samples. Each sample was prepared successively. The standard deviation of the respective measurement number represents 10 consecutive measurements after the diffusion equilibrium has been achieved. Based on the five independent measurements, the mean peak area and standard deviations were determined. The mean peak area values vs. the number of measurements (i.e., sample number) are shown for each VOC in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Figure 8

Reproducibility of the MIR chemical sensor system determined from five independent sample measurements demonstrated for (a) 13DCB, (b) pCYM, (c) EB, (d) 12DCB, (e) 124TCB, (f) CAR, (g) TCE, (h) TeCE, (i) MYR, and (j) pXYL.

4. Conclusions

A sensor for the simultaneous detection of multiple VOCs in a real seawater matrix based on MIR evanescent field spectroscopy was presented. The developed sensor comprised a compact FT-IR spectrometer, coupling optics, and a thermoelectrically-cooled MCT detector. A AgX fiber, located inside a µ-flow cell, was used as a waveguide. The actively transducing part (i.e., flattened segment) was coated with an E/P-co polymer. This hydrophobic membrane effectively excluded the water from the penetration depth of the evanescent field, therefore, the seawater matrix did not influence the absorption features of the respective VOC. Furthermore, protection of the AgX fiber was preserved. A mixture containing 10 different VOCs in seawater, which had been sampled from the coastal region of Arcachon, France, were successfully enriched into the E/P-co polymer layer. Linear calibration functions were established with detection limits in the low ppm to ppb concentration range, which were comparable to the literature based on the low number of averaged scans applied during the individual measurements. It has been demonstrated that the MIR chemical sensor showed reversible enrichment behavior due to the recovery of the polymer membrane by flushing a methanol/water mixture through the flow cell. Hence, multiple measurement cycles over a long-time period are guaranteed. Five repetitive measurements of the same concentration showed good reproducibility. During the measuring period, changing seawater conditions (i.e., salinity, turbidity, temperature, pH, and other unidentified organic matters) did not significantly affect the performance of the sensor. The entire sensor system was miniaturized in size and fit inside a transportation housing, thus enabling direct analysis at the point of discharge. In contrast to conventionally used techniques such as GC-MS or HPLC, the sensor is capable of being deployed on-boat or on-buoy. Future integration into a submersible housing for application in deep sea can be enabled, therefore, the MIR sensor is applicable for threshold alarm sensing (i.e., on-line wastewater or effluent monitoring or controlling underground fuel storage tanks, pipelines, producing oil platforms, and deep-water dumpsites) for the protection of global waters and the marine ecosystem. For drinking water monitoring, the LOD has to be further decreased to achieve the guidelines set by the European Union and other commissions (US EPA, the World Health Organization). Therefore, the number of averaged scans or the number of total internal reflections (i.e., new waveguide design) should be increased. Further improvements can be achieved by optimizing the flow cell design.

Acknowledgments

The machine shop of Ulm University is acknowledged for its support during the sensor development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D. and B.M.; Design of the FT-IR FEWS sensor system, C.D., Y.R., A.K., and B.M.; Final data acquisition, C.D.; Data evaluation, C.D.; Writing—original draft, C.D.; Writing—review and editing, B.M.; Funding acquisition, B.M.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union FP7 project SCHeMA – Integrated in Situ Chemical Mapping Probes, grant number 614002.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  • 1.Tornero V., Hanke G. Chemical contaminants entering the marine environment from sea-based sources: A review with a focus on European seas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016;112:17–38. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Spietelun A., Marcinkowski Ł., Kloskowski A., Namieśnik J. Determination of volatile organic compounds in water samples using membrane-solid phase microextraction (M-SPME) (headspace version) Analyst. 2013;138:5099. doi: 10.1039/c3an36851c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sacks R., Akard M. High-Speed GC Analysis of VOCs: Tunable Selectivity and Column Selection. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994;28:428A–433A. doi: 10.1021/es00058a721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.López S.H., Gómez M.J., Hernando M.D., Fernández-Alba A.R. Automated dynamic headspace followed by a comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography full scan time-of-flight mass spectrometry method for screening of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water. Anal. Methods. 2013;5:1165–1177. doi: 10.1039/c2ay26234g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Williams P., Benton L., Warmerdam J., Sheehans P. Comparative risk analysis of six volatile organic compounds in California drinking water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36:4721–4728. doi: 10.1021/es020725y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kostopoulou M.N., Golfinopoulos S.K., Nikolaou A.D., Xilourgidis N.K., Lekkas T.D. Volatile organic compounds in the surface waters of northern Greece. Chemosphere. 2000;40:527–532. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00293-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu T., Chen W., Fertein E., Cazier F., Dewaele D., Gao X. Development of an open-path incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced spectroscopy based instrument for simultaneous measurement of HONO and NO2 in ambient air. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 2012;106:501–509. doi: 10.1007/s00340-011-4818-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barber L.B., Thurman E.M., Takahashi Y., Noriega M.C. Comparison of purge and trap GC/MS and purgeable organic chloride analysis for monitoring volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons. Ground Water. 1992;30:836–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1992.tb01565.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell D.P., Gottfried D.S., Cobb-Sullivan J.M. Groundwater monitoring of VOCs with an interferometric optical waveguide sensor. Proc. SPIE. 2004;5586:136–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt T.C., Haderlein S.B., Pfister R., Forster R. Occurrence and fate modeling of MTBE and BTEX compounds in a Swiss Lake used as drinking water supply. Water Res. 2004;38:1520–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martínez E., Lacorte S., Llobet I., Viana P., Barceló D. Multicomponent analysis of volatile organic compounds in water by automated purge and trap coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2002;959:181–190. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00439-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Mudhaf H.F., Alsharifi F.A., Abu-Shady A.S.I. A survey of organic contaminants in household and bottled drinking waters in Kuwait. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407:1658–1668. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Campillo N., Viñas P., López-García I., Aguinaga N., Hernández-Córdoba M. Purge-and-trap capillary gas chromatography with atomic emission detection for volatile halogenated organic compounds determination in waters and beverages. J. Chromatogr. A. 2004;1035:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kavcar P., Odabasi M., Kitis M., Inal F., Sofuoglu S.C. Occurrence, oral exposure and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in drinking water for İzmir. Water Res. 2006;40:3219–3230. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown M.A., Miller S., Emmert G.L. On-line purge and trap gas chromatography for monitoring of trihalomethanes in drinking water distribution systems. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007;592:154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Golfinopoulos S.K., Lekkas T.D., Nikolaou A.D. Comparison of methods for determination of volatile organic compounds in drinking water. Chemosphere. 2001;45:275–284. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00553-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Safarova V.I., Sapelnikova S.V., Djazhenko E.V., Teplova G.I., Shajdulina G.F., Kudasheva F.K. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with headspace for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in waste water. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2004;800:325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.10.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gomez-Belinchon J.I., Grimalt J.O., Albaigès J. Volatile organic compounds in two polluted rivers in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) Water Res. 1991;25:577–589. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90130-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zoeteman B.C.J., Harmsen K., Linders J.B.H.J., Morra C.F.H., Slooff W. Persistent organic pollutants in river water and ground water of the Netherlands. Chemosphere. 1980;9:231–249. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(80)90080-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huybrechts T., Thas O., Dewulf J., Van Langenhove H. How to estimate moments and quantiles of environmental data sets with non-detected observations? A case study on volatile organic compounds in marine water samples. J. Chromatogr. A. 2002;975:123–133. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01327-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bravo-Linares C.M., Mudge S.M., Loyola-Sepulveda R.H. Occurrence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Liverpool Bay, Irish Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007;54:1742–1753. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Emmert G.L., Geme G., Brown M.A., Simone P.S. A single automated instrument for monitoring total trihalomethane and total haloacetic acid concentrations in near real-time. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2009;656:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kameyama S., Tanimoto H., Inomata S., Tsunogai U., Ooki A., Takeda S., Obata H., Tsuda A., Uematsu M. High-resolution measurement of multiple volatile organic compounds dissolved in seawater using equilibrator inlet-proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (EI-PTR-MS) Mar. Chem. 2010;122:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2010.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Auer N.R., Manzke B.U., Schulz-Bull D.E. Development of a purge and trap continuous flow system for the stable carbon isotope analysis of volatile halogenated organic compounds in water. J. Chromatogr. A. 2006;1131:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cavalcante R.M., de Andrade M.V.F., Marins R.V., Oliveira L.D.M. Development of a headspace-gas chromatography (HS-GC-PID-FID) method for the determination of VOCs in environmental aqueous matrices: Optimization, verification and elimination of matrix effect and VOC distribution on the Fortaleza Coast, Brazil. Microchem. J. 2010;96:337–343. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2010.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schwarzenbach R.P., Bromund R.H., Gschwend P.M., Zafiriou O.C. Volatile organic compounds in coastal seawater. Org. Geochem. 1978;1:93–107. doi: 10.1016/0146-6380(78)90006-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Martínez E., Llobet I., Lacorte S., Viana P., Barceló D. Patterns and levels of halogenated volatile compounds in Portuguese surface waters. J. Environ. Monit. 2002;4:253–257. doi: 10.1039/b109623k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mesarchaki E., Yassaa N., Hein D., Lutterbeck H.E., Zindler C., Williams J. A novel method for the measurement of VOCs in seawater using needle trap devices and GC-MS. Mar. Chem. 2014;159:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2013.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Crise A., Kaberi H., Ruiz J., Zatsepin A., Arashkevich E., Giani M., Karageorgis A.P., Prieto L., Pantazi M., Gonzalez-Fernandez D., et al. A MSFD complementary approach for the assessment of pressures, knowledge and data gaps in Southern European Seas: The PERSEUS experience. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015;95:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Freije A.M. Heavy metal, trace element and petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in the Arabian Gulf: Review. J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015;17:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jaubas.2014.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.United States Environmental Protection Agency . EPA’s Publication Distributor; Cincinnati, OH, USA: 2016. Release Detection for Underground Storage Tanks And Piping: Straight Talk On Tanks. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nikolaou A.D., Golfinopoulos S.K., Kostopoulou M.N., Kolokythas G.A., Lekkas T.D. Determination of volatile organic compounds in surface waters and treated wastewater in Greece. Water Res. 2002;36:2883–2890. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00497-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huybrechts T., Dewulf J., Van Langenhove H. Priority volatile organic compounds in surface waters of the southern North Sea. Environ. Pollut. 2005;133:255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pecoraino G., Scalici L., Avellone G., Ceraulo L., Favara R., Candela E.G., Provenzano M.C., Scaletta C. Distribution of volatile organic compounds in Sicilian groundwaters analysed by head space-solid phase micro extraction coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME/GC/MS) Water Res. 2008;42:3563–3577. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Antoniou C.V., Koukouraki E.E., Diamadopoulos E. Determination of chlorinated volatile organic compounds in water and municipal wastewater using headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 2006;1132:310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ji J., Deng C., Shen W., Zhang X. Field analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene in water by portable gas chromatography-microflame ionization detector combined with headspace solid-phase microextraction. Talanta. 2006;69:894–899. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wittkamp B.L., Hawthorne S.B., Tilotta D.C. Determination of Aromatic Compounds in Water by Solid Phase Microextraction and Ultraviolet Absorption Spectroscopy. 1. Methodology. Anal. Chem. 1997;69:1197–1203. doi: 10.1021/ac960761d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vogt F., Tacke M., Jakusch M., Mizaikoff B. A UV spectroscopic method for monitoring aromatic hydrocarbons dissolved in water. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2000;422:187–198. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01065-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wittkamp B.L., Tilotta D.C. Determination of BTEX Compounds in Water by Solid-Phase Microextraction and Raman Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 1995;67:600–605. doi: 10.1021/ac00099a018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lima K.M.G., Raimundo I.M., Pimentel M.F. Simultaneous determination of BTX and total hydrocarbons in water employing near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011;160:691–697. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.08.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carr J.W., Harris J.M. In situ fluorescence detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons following preconcentration on alkylated silica adsorbents. Anal. Chem. 1988;60:698–702. doi: 10.1021/ac00158a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Beyer T., Hahn P., Hartwig S., Konz W., Scharring S., Katzir A., Steiner H., Jakusch M., Kraft M., Mizaikoff B. Mini spectrometer with silver halide sensor fiber for in situ detection of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003;90:319–323. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00054-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mizaikoff B. Mid-IR fiber-optic sensors. Anal. Chem. 2003;75:258A–267A. doi: 10.1021/ac031340g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Raichlin Y., Katzir A. Fiber-Optic Evanescent Wave Spectroscopy in. Appl. Spectrosc. 2008;62:32A–72A. doi: 10.1366/000370208783575456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Steiner H., Jakusch M., Kraft M., Karlowatz M., Baumann T., Niessner R., Konz W., Brandenburg A., Michel K., Boussard-Pledel C., et al. In situ sensing of volatile organic compounds in groundwater: First field tests of a mid-infrared fiber-optic sensing system. Appl. Spectrosc. 2003;57:607–613. doi: 10.1366/000370203322005274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mizaikoff B., Göbel R., Krska R., Taga K., Kellner R., Tacke M., Katzir A. Infrared fiber-optical chemical sensors with reactive surface coatings. Sens. Actuators B. 1995;29:58–63. doi: 10.1016/0925-4005(95)01663-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Walsh J.E., MacCraith B.D., Meaney M., Vos J.G., Regan F., Lancia A., Artjushenko S. Sensing of chlorinated hydrocarbons and pesticides in water using polymer coated mid-infrared optical fibres. Analyst. 1996;121:789–792. doi: 10.1039/an9962100789. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Charlton C., Katzir A., Mizaikoff B. Infrared evanescent field sensing with quantum cascade lasers and planar silver halide waveguides. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:4398–4403. doi: 10.1021/ac048189a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lu R., Mizaikoff B., Li W.-W., Qian C., Katzir A., Raichlin Y., Sheng G.-P., Yu H.-Q. Determination of chlorinated hydrocarbons in water using highly sensitive mid-infrared sensor technology. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2525–2531. doi: 10.1038/srep02525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lu R., Sheng G., Li W., Yu H., Raichlin Y., Katzir A., Mizaikoff B. IR-ATR Chemical Sensors Based on Planar Silver Halide Waveguides Coated with an Ethylene/Propylene Copolymer for Detection of Multiple Organic Contaminants in Water. Angew. Chem. 2013;125:2321–2324. doi: 10.1002/ange.201209256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kosower E.M., Markovich G., Raichlin Y., Borz G., Katzir A. Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption and Amplified Spectra on Planar Silver Halide Fiber. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108:12633–12636. doi: 10.1021/jp037983h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Göbel R., Krska R., Kellner R., Katzir A. Development of protective polymer coatings for silver halide fibers and their application as threshold level sensors for chlorinated hydrocarbons in sea water. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 1994;348:780–781. doi: 10.1007/BF00323708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Göbel R., Seitz R.W., Tomellini S.A., Krska R., Kellner R. Infrared attenuated total reflection spectroscopic investigations of the diffusion behaviour of chlorinated hydrocarbons into polymer membranes. Vib. Spectrosc. 1995;8:141–149. doi: 10.1016/0924-2031(94)00045-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Göbel R., Krska R., Kellner R., Seitz R.W., Tomellini S.A. Investigation of Different Polymers as Coating Materials for IR/ATR Spectroscopic Trace Analysis of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Water. Appl. Spectrosc. 1994;48:678–683. doi: 10.1366/000370294774369054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Howley R., MacCraith B.D., O’Dwyer K., Kirwan P., McLoughlin P. A study of the factors affecting the diffusion of chlorinated hydrocarbons into polyisobutylene and polyethylene-co-propylene for evanescent wave sensing. Vib. Spectrosc. 2003;31:271–278. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2031(03)00020-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Göbel R., Krska R., Neal S., Kellner R. Performance studies of an IR fiber optic sensor for chlorinated hydrocarbons in water. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1994;350:514–519. doi: 10.1007/BF00321798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jakusch M., Mizaikoff B., Kellner R., Katzir A. Towards a remote IR fiber-optic sensor system for the determination of chlorinated hydrocarbons in water. Sens. Actuators B. 1997;38:83–87. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(97)80175-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Murphy B., McLoughlin P. Determination of chlorinated hydrocarbon species in aqueous solution using Teflon coated ATR waveguide/FTIR spectroscopy. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2003;83:653–662. doi: 10.1080/0306731021000015001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Flavin K., Hughes H., Dobbyn V., Kirwan P., Murphy K., Steiner H., Mizaikoff B., Mcloughlin P. A comparison of polymeric materials as pre-concentrating media for use with ATR/FTIR sensing. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2006;86:401–415. doi: 10.1080/03067310500291585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Howley R., MacCraith B.D., O’Dwyer K., Masterson H., Kirwan P., McLoughlin P. Determination of hydrocarbons using sapphire fibers coated with poly(dimethylsiloxane) Appl. Spectrosc. 2003;57:400–406. doi: 10.1366/00037020360625934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kraft M., Jakusch M., Karlowatz M., Katzir A., Mizaikoff B. New frontiers for mid-infrared sensors: Towards deep sea monitoring with a submarine FT-IR sensor system. Appl. Spectrosc. 2003;57:591–599. doi: 10.1366/000370203322005256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mizaikoff B., Kraft M., Jakusch M. Water monitoring using infrared fiber optic sensors. IEEE Ocean. Eng. Soc. Ocean. Conf. Proc. (Cat. No.98CH36259) 1998;3:1401–1404. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Krska R., Taga K., Kellner R. New IR Fiber-Optic Chemical Sensor for In Situ Measurements of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Water. Appl. Spectrosc. 1993;47:1484–1487. doi: 10.1366/0003702934067423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hahn P., Tacke M., Jakusch M., Mizaikoff B., Spector O., Katzir A. Detection of hydrocarbons in water by MIR evanescent-wave spectroscopy with flattened silver halide fibers. Appl. Spectrosc. 2001;55:39–43. doi: 10.1366/0003702011951407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lu R., Li W.-W., Mizaikoff B., Katzir A., Raichlin Y., Sheng G.-P., Yu H.-Q. High-sensitivity infrared attenuated total reflectance sensors for in situ multicomponent detection of volatile organic compounds in water. Nat. Protoc. 2016;11:377–386. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kraft M., Mizaikoff B. A Mid-Infrared Sensor for Monitoring of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in the Marine Environment. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2000;78:367–383. doi: 10.1080/03067310008041354. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.SCHeMA Project—Integrated in Situ Chemical Mapping probes. [(accessed on 20 August 2019)]; Available online: http://www.schema-ocean.eu/
  • 68.Wallace W.E. In: Infrared Spectra in NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Linstrom P.J., Mallard W.G., editors. National Institute of Standards and Technology; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2018. p. 20899. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mizaikoff B. Mid-infrared evanescent wave sensors—A novel approach for subsea monitoring. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1999;10:1185–1194. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/10/12/310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES