Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be used as an early predictor of 90-day survival in patients with acute paraquat (PQ) poisoning.
This study enrolled 105 patients with acute PQ poisoning admitted from May 2012 to May 2018. Kaplan–Meier curve, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to investigate the predictive value of NLR for 90–day survival of patients with acute PQ poisoning.
The 90-day survival rate was 40.95% (43/105). Survivors had lower NLR (P <.001), which was an independent predictor of 90-day survival according to the Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. The area under the NLR curve was 0.842 (95% CI: 0.767–0.917, P <.001) in predicting 90-day survival.
Our findings showed that low NLR was a valuable early predictor of 90-day survival in patients with acute PQ poisoning.
Keywords: neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, paraquat, prognosis
1. Introduction
Paraquat (N, N′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride; PQ) is a rapid-acting, nonselective herbicide that has been used for weed control in underdeveloped agricultural countries. PQ kills plants rapidly by deactivating the photosynthetic mechanism. It also has a considerable toxicity toward humans and has become the leading cause of death by pesticide poisoning.[1] PQ also has considerable toxicity toward animals and humans and has widely been utilized for suicide. In humans, an oral dose of >30 mg/kg damages the lungs and kidneys, thereby leading to subsequent death.[2] Although various treatment modalities for acute PQ poisoning exist, the fatality rate remains high, with affected individuals presenting a mortality rate of 50% to 90%.[3–7] Identifying the factors associated with early mortality may provide primary clinical information for correct evaluations and treatment decisions. For example, early prediction of inevitable death is important to terminate inappropriate treatments in terminal acute PQ poisoning patients. In addition, effective prediction methods can help clinicians to determine the conditions and severity of PQ poisoning to patients and their family. Therefore, confirming PQ-poisoning diagnosis and risk assessment in a timely manner is particularly important.
Many studies reported to date indicated that PQ concentrations, especially plasma PQ concentrations, are highly associated with the prognosis of PQ poisoning; the measurement of plasma and urine PQ concentrations has been confirmed as the most useful approach in PQ poisoning test. High-performance liquid chromatography can accurately determine PQ concentrations but requires extremely expensive, technical, and accurate equipment that are unavailable in most hospitals. This situation raises the need to develop a valuable predictor for prognosis to guide future therapeutic intervention.
One of the simplest and most readily available tests in the clinic is the complete blood cell count, which reports the absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. The serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an economical and convenient indicator of systemic inflammation. NLR is a useful prognostic indicator in various diseases, including community-acquired pneumonia,[8] ischemic heart disease,[9] ulcerative colitis,[10] appendicitis,[11] and cancer.[12] However, limited data[13] suggested that NLR can be a predictor for prognosis in patient with PQ poisoning. Thus, this retrospective clinical study investigated the early predictive value of NLR in patients with acute PQ poisoning.
2. Methods
2.1. Ethics and consent
This retrospective clinical study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Cangzhou Central Hospital, China (No. 2017-090-01). The medical records of all PQ poisoning patients hospitalized from May 2012 to May 2018 in the emergency department were reviewed, and all data collected were anonymized and standardized. Considering that this study involved a retrospective review of existing data, specific written informed consent was obtained from patients. However, informed consent regarding the treatment risk following acute PQ poisoning was obtained from all patients upon their initial admission.
2.2. Patients
Patients were diagnosed with acute PQ poisoning by checking their plasma PQ concentrations. The inclusion criteria included:
-
1.
patients aged >14,
-
2.
patients with PQ poisoning through oral intake,
-
3.
hospital admission within 12 hours of poisoning, and
-
4.
no history of serious chronic disease.
Exclusion criteria included:
-
1.
dermal or intravascular exposure,
-
2.
patients with other pesticide poisoning,
-
3.
pregnant patients,
-
4.
cases with infection,
-
5.
cases with immunosuppressive therapy, or
-
6.
cases with blood systemic diseases.
2.3. Data collection
All data, which included:
-
(1)
demographic parameters, such as age and gender;
-
(2)
time interval from PQ ingestion to gastric lavage in the emergency department;
-
(3)
plasma PQ level;
-
(4)
time from ingestion to blood sampling, and
-
(5)
clinical laboratory parameters including NLR, alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and plasma PQ concentration, were collected by experienced physicians by using a standard collection form in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.
The primary endpoint of the study was 90-day survival, and survival time was identified from medical records or telephone follow-up.
2.4. Sample size
To test the hypothesis that NLR has 80% sensibility and 80% specificity, with alpha error of 0.05, power of the study of 80%, and allowable error of 12.5%, we should have 99 patients as the sample size.[14] However, we decided to enroll 105 patients to allow for probable dropouts.
2.5. Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with Statistical Product and Service Solutions version 13.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The results were presented as the means±standard deviations and assessed using the 2-independent sample t-test or 1-way ANOVA when the data fitted a normal distribution. Otherwise, the results were presented as medians and interquartile ranges, which were assessed using the 2- or multiple independent sample and nonparametric tests, respectively. Categorical variables were presented as absolute frequency and percentage and compared using Pearson's chi-squared test. Kaplan–Meier method was used to establish survival curves, and the survival differences were compared using log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to establish univariate and multivariate survival analyses in evaluating the independent predictive factors. P <.05 in the univariate analysis was required for a variable to enter the multivariate model. The analyses of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curves (AUC) were performed to evaluate how well the NLR functioned as a predictive value for the mortality in patients with PQ poisoning. The P values were 2-tailed, with P <.05 considered as statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Patient characteristics
Overall, 105 acute PQ poisoning patients were identified from May 2012 to May 2018, with more women (60, 57.1%) than men (45, 42.9%). The 90-day survival rate was 40.95% (43/105), and the medial survival time of dead cases was 4.03 (1.00–10.00) days. At the baseline, nonsurvivors had high NLR, ALT, creatinine, and plasma PQ concentrations (Table 1). When stratified according to NLR (<10, 10–20, and >20), the creatinine and plasma PQ concentrations upon arrival significantly differed among groups (Table 2), and the case-fatality rates were 34% in NLR <10, 80% in NLR 10 to 20, and 100% in NLR >20 (Fig. 1).
Table 1.
General characteristics upon arrival between survival and mortality groups.

Table 2.
General characteristics upon arrival stratified according to NLR level.

Figure 1.

Mortality of the groups according to the NLR level. NLR = neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio.
3.2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses
The Kaplan–Meier survival curves (Fig. 2) showed that low NLR was associated with high 90-day survival (log-rank test; P <.001). Low NLR, ALT, creatinine, and plasma PQ concentrations were associated with 90-day survival in the univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Meanwhile, low NLR, creatinine, and plasma PQ concentrations were associated with a 90-day survival in the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses (Table 3).
Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival curves for the groups according to the NLR level. NLR = neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio.
Table 3.
Cox regression model.

3.3. Correlation analysis
Correlation analysis demonstrated that NLR was negatively correlated with survival time (r = −0.409; P <.001) and 90-day survival (r = −0.410; P <.001).
3.4. ROC curve analysis for 90-day mortality
The ROC curves of NLR, creatinine, and plasma PQ concentrations showed an AUC value of 0.842 (95% CI: 0.768–0.906, P <.001), 0.863 (95% CI: 0.783–0.923, P <.001), and 0.964 (95% CI: 0.908–0.990, P <.001), respectively (Fig. 3 and Table 4). The predictive values of plasma PQ concentration were significantly higher than those of creatinine (Z = 2.720, P = .007) and NLR (Z = 3.229, P = .001). By contrast, the predictive values of NLR were similar to those of creatinine (Z = 0.422, P = .673).
Figure 3.

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. NLR = neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, PQ = paraquat.
Table 4.
ROC curve analysis.

4. Discussion
PQ poisoning can cause severe multiple organ failure involving the kidneys, liver, lungs, adrenal glands, and the central nervous system. The lethal toxicity of PQ has resulted in a high mortality rate in the range of 60% to 80%,[3,4,6,15] which has been attributed to PQ's inherent toxicity and the lack of any effective treatment to ameliorate the toxic effects of poisoning. The 90-day survival rate was 40.95% in our study, which was consistent with the results of previous reports.[3,4,6,15]
Neutrophil remarkably increased after PQ poisoning, whereas lymphocyte levels declined. The molecular mechanisms underlying PQ toxicities have been unidentified. However, several potential mechanisms may be summarized as follows. First, the activities of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6, 8, and 17, remarkably enhanced within hours after PQ ingestion and rapidly promoted the extensive influx of neutrophils.[16–19] Second, PQ could accelerate the generation of reactive oxygen species and significantly reduce neutrophil apoptosis through nuclear factor-κB, p38 mitogen-activated kinase, and myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1.[20,21] Meanwhile, intracellular redox state imbalance caused lymphocyte apoptosis by activating apoptotic enzyme caspase-3.[22–25]
In the present study, multiple factor COX regression analysis revealed that initial plasma PQ, creatinine, and NLR concentrations were associated with the risk of mortality from PQ poisoning. A rise in creatinine is a good predictor because it is both an indicator of the extent of ongoing toxicity and of the ability to eliminate PQ.[26,27] However, creatinine cannot be used as a predictor for acute PQ poisoning in patients with chronic renal function impairment. The most effective way to assess the severity of acute PQ poisoning is by monitoring plasma PQ level. The plasma level peaks early, that is, at 1 hour after PQ ingestion, followed by a rapid decline with a steep gradient due to rapid distribution from circulation to other compartments.[28] The plasma PQ level obtained within h after PQ ingestion is a reliable predictor for prognosis. The role of prediction gradually diminished over time.[29]
Consistent with the results of a previous report,[13] NLR is a valuable early predictor of 90-day mortality in patients with acute PQ poisoning. However, the NLR had an area of 0.842 in our study, which was lower than the value (0.916) suggested by the previous report.[13] We speculated that the discrepancy is related to the time response. The estimated mean interval time from PQ ingestion to the blood test in our study is 4 hours, whereas 7 hours was used in a previous study. Neutrophil count was still declining, and that of lymphocyte was increasing; NLR did not peak within 4 hours.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, retrospective studies that use administrative data may contain unintended bias. Retrospective study design does not allow comprehensive data collection that is directly related to the study question. Second, the relatively small sample size our study may have prevented the statistical detection of clinically significant differences and thus led to limited generalizability. Third, differential diagnosis of NLR in various diseases mainly relies on oral pesticide history and plasma PQ test.
In conclusion, our findings showed that low NLR was a valuable early predictor of 90-day survival in patients with acute PQ poisoning. For hospitals that lack facilities to measure plasma PQ concentration, NLR monitoring provides additional useful information in selecting the therapy and assessment of prognosis. In addition, NLR monitoring features the advantages of low cost, stability, rapid testing, and repeatability. However, sophisticated studies are needed to identify the NLR potential further.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Zong Xun Cao, Shun Yi Feng.
Data curation: Zong Xun Cao, Ya Qi Song, Wen Jing Bai, Yong Zhao, Su Li Zhang.
Investigation: Ya Qi Song, Wen Jing Bai, Yong Zhao, Su Li Zhang.
Writing – original draft: Zong Xun Cao, Wen Jie Wang.
Writing – review & editing: Shun Yi Feng.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve, NLR = neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, PQ = paraquat, ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
How to cite this article: Cao ZX, Song YQ, Bai WJ, Wang WJ, Zhao Y, Zhang SL, Feng SY. Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio as an early predictor for patients with acute paraquat poisoning. Medicine. 2019;98:37(e17199).
ZXC, YQS, and WJB contributed equally to this work.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- [1].Eddleston M. Patterns and problems of deliberate self-poisoning in the developing world. QJM 2000;93:715–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Onyeama HP, Oehme FW. A literature review of paraquat toxicity. Vet Hum Toxicol 1984;26:494–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Wu WP, Lai MN, Lin CH, et al. Addition of immunosuppressive treatment to hemoperfusion is associated with improved survival after paraquat poisoning: a nationwide study. PLoS One 2014;9:e87568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Tan JT, Letchuman Ramanathan G, Choy MP, et al. Paraquat poisoning: experience in hospital taiping (year 2008 - october 2011). Med J Malaysia 2013;68:384–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Weng CH, Hu CC, Lin JL, et al. Predictors of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with paraquat intoxication. PLoS One 2013;8:e82695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Lee Y, Lee JH, Seong AJ, et al. Arterial lactate as a predictor of mortality in emergency department patients with paraquat intoxication. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2012;50:52–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ko DR, Chung SP, You JS, et al. Effects of paraquat ban on herbicide poisoning-related mortality. Yonsei Med J 2017;58:859–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Cataudella E, Giraffa CM, Di Marca S, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: an emerging marker predicting prognosis in elderly adults with community-acquired pneumonia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:1796–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Li X, Ji Y, Kang J, et al. Association between blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and severity of coronary artery disease: Evidence from 17 observational studies involving 7017 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Nishida Y, Hosomi S, Yamagami H, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting loss of response to infliximab in ulcerative colitis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0169845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Jung SK, Rhee DY, Lee WJ, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio is associated with perforated appendicitis in elderly patients of emergency department. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017;29:529–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Li H, Zhao Y, Zheng F. Prognostic significance of elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for patients with colorectal cancer undergoing curative surgery: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Zhou DC, Zhang H, Luo ZM, et al. Prognostic value of hematological parameters in patients with paraquat poisoning. Sci Rep 2016;6:36235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Negida A, Fahim NK, Negida Y. Sample size calculation guide—Part 4: how to calculate the sample size for a diagnostic test accuracy study based on sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve. Adv J Emerg Med 2019;3:e33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Chen KH, et al. Repeated pulse of methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide with continuous dexamethasone therapy for patients with severe paraquat poisoning. Crit Care Med 2006;34:368–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Yan B, Chen F, Xu L, et al. HMGB1-TLR4-IL23-IL17A axis promotes paraquat-induced acute lung injury by mediating neutrophil infiltration in mice. Sci Rep 2017;7:597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Song HW, Yang C, Liu W, et al. Interleukin-17A plays the same role on mice acute lung injury respectively induced by lipopolysaccharide and paraquat. Inflammation 2017;40:1509–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Chen D, Ma T, Liu XW, et al. Rapamycin reverses paraquat-induced acute lung injury in a rat model through inhibition of NFkappaB activation. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8:4627–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Chen CM, Wang LF, Su B, et al. Methylprednisolone effects on oxygenation and histology in a rat model of acute lung injury. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2003;16:215–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Qin KX, Li CW, Fang Y, et al. Effect of reactive oxygen species induced by paraquat on neutrophil apoptosis. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi 2015;31:111–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Wang X, Luo F, Zhao H. Paraquat-induced reactive oxygen species inhibit neutrophil apoptosis via a p38 MAPK/NF-(B-IL-6/TNF-( positive-feedback circuit. PLoS One 2014;9:e93837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Ortona E, Margutti P, Matarrese P, et al. Redox state, cell death and autoimmune diseases: a gender perspective. Autoimmun Rev 2008;7:579–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Zhao G, Cao K, Xu C, et al. Crosstalk between mitochondrial fission and oxidative stress in paraquat-induced apoptosis in mouse alveolar type II cells. Int J Biol Sci 2017;13:888–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Bismuth C, Scherrmann JM, Garnier R, et al. Elimination of paraquat. Dev Toxicol Environ Sci 1986;12:347–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Alonso de Vega JM, Diaz J, Serrano E, et al. Oxidative stress in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1782–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Liu JY, Li LR, Jin HY, et al. Influence factors for prognosis in patients with acute oral poisoning with paraquat. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2012;30:686–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Roberts DM, Wilks MF, Roberts MS, et al. Changes in the concentrations of creatinine, cystatin C and NGAL in patients with acute paraquat self-poisoning. Toxicol Lett 2011;202:69–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Seok S, Kim YH, Gil HW, et al. The time between paraquat ingestion and a negative dithionite urine test in an independent risk factor for death and organ failure in acute paraquat intoxication. J Korean Med Sci 2012;27:993–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Gil HW, Kang MS, Yang JO, et al. Association between plasma paraquat level and outcome of paraquat poisoning in 375 paraquat poisoning patients. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008;46:515–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
