Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2019 Sep 19;8(38):e00677-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00677-19

Complete Genome Sequences of Mycobacterium smegmatis Phages NihilNomen and Carlyle, Isolated in Las Vegas, Nevada

Alicia Salisbury a, Ryan Doss a, Astha Mehta a, Khadija Bhatti a, Ciera Dapra a, Audrey Huntsinger a, Stephanie Rodriguez a, Scott Yacek a, Rylee Sandberg a, Alexis Gildore a, Jacinda Knudtson a, Frances Tibayan a, Tiannah Ohta a, Neha Zafar a, Guadalupe Mercado a, Alan Le a, Natalie Mekhaeel a, Justin Willer a, Edith Rodrich-Zuniga a, Merissa McFarland a, Kurt Regner a, Christy Strong a, Philippos K Tsourkas a,
Editor: Simon Rouxb
PMCID: PMC6753266  PMID: 31537662

We present the complete genomes of the Mycobacterium smegmatis phages Carlyle and NihilNomen, isolated from soil in Las Vegas, Nevada. The phages were isolated and annotated by undergraduate students enrolled in the Phage Discovery course offered by the School of Life Sciences at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.

ABSTRACT

We present the complete genomes of the Mycobacterium smegmatis phages Carlyle and NihilNomen, isolated from soil in Las Vegas, Nevada. The phages were isolated and annotated by undergraduate students enrolled in the Phage Discovery course offered by the School of Life Sciences at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Phages that infect Mycobacterium smegmatis account for the largest number of sequenced phage genomes, numbering approximately 1,800 (1). This is largely due to the versatility of this host and its consequent popularity with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s (HHMI) Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomic and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program (2). Recently, three M. smegmatis phages isolated by students in the SEA-PHAGES program were used to treat a potentially lethal infection of antibiotic-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus in a cystic fibrosis patient (3). Here, we present the complete genomes of two M. smegmatis phages isolated by students enrolled in the Phage Discovery course (BIOL 207X and BIOL 209X) at the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV).

Both phages were isolated from soil obtained from the community gardens on the UNLV campus by students in the course BIOL 207X. A direct isolation method was used. Environmental samples were incubated with enrichment broth and shaken (250 rpm, 2 h) at room temperature, followed by centrifugation and filter sterilization (0.22 μm) of the supernatant per HHMI’s SEA-PHAGES Phage Discovery Guide (https://seaphages.org/faculty/information/#phagediscovery). The phages were then purified and amplified in M. smegmatis mc2155. The DNA was extracted using the manufacturer’s protocol, provided in the phage DNA isolation kit (catalog number 46800; Norgen Biotek). Phage genomes were sequenced at the University of Pittsburgh. Sequencing libraries were prepared from genomic DNA by using an NEB Ultra II kit, producing 150-bp single-end reads. The libraries were sequenced with an Illumina MiSeq instrument, yielding single-end reads sufficient to provide at least 150-fold coverage for each genome. The reads were quality trimmed and assembled de novo by using Newbler version 2.9 with default settings, in each case yielding a single contig, which was checked for completeness, accuracy, and phage genomic termini by using Consed version 29, as described by Russell (4).

The assembly results (coverage depth, genome length, GC content, number of genes) and the phages’ GenBank and SRA accession numbers are shown in Table 1. The phages were assigned to clusters based on genomic sequence similarity using the phagesdb.org database and Phamerator software with default settings (1, 5). Despite their similar geographic provenance, the phages are not closely related. Carlyle is cluster A1 and NihilNomen is cluster J based on the average nucleotide sequence identity. A ClustalW multiple alignment using default settings showed that the phages have roughly 45% average nucleotide sequence identity (ANI) between them, which is the same as that of two randomly generated DNA sequences. Both phages are predicted to use the “cohesive ends with 3′ overhangs” DNA packaging strategy (6).

TABLE 1.

Phage GenBank and SRA accession numbers and genome assembly results

Phage name GenBank accession no. SRA accession no. Avg coverage Cluster Genome length (bp) GC content (%) No. of genes
Carlyle MK967401 SRX5960826 1,929 A1 51,220 63.6 91
NihilNomen MK967402 SRX5960825 897 J 11,0439 60.8 241

The assembled genomes were annotated using DNA Master with default settings, as described by Pope and Jacobs-Sera (7), by students in the course BIOL 209X at UNLV. We identified 91 genes in Carlyle and 241 in NihilNomen, of which 1 is a tRNA (Gly-tcc). The protein functions were assigned using Protein BLAST (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Proteins), Batch Web CD-Search (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi), and HHpred (toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tools/hhpred) using default settings. Using a cutoff E value of 1E-7, we assigned putative functions to 46 genes in Carlyle (50.5%) and 65 genes in NihilNomen (27%). A small and large terminase, a portal protein, a capsid maturation protease, a major capsid protein, a major tail protein, two tail assembly chaperones, a tail tape measure protein, lysin A and lysin B, and integrase were identified in both phages. The tail assembly chaperones have a predicted translational frameshift located in the 3′ region of the upstream tail assembly protein. A holin, excise, and Cro were identified in NihilNomen but not in Carlyle. Of interest is the identification of a 690-bp-long third terminase (gp2) in NihilNomen, an unusual feature present in some cluster J M. smegmatis phages, which is currently being investigated in our laboratory.

Data availability.

GenBank and SRA accession numbers are listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

K.R., C.S., and P.K.T. acknowledge support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the University of Pittsburgh (in particular, Becky Garlena, Dan Russell, Graham Hatfull, and Welkin Pope), and the School of Life Sciences and College of Science at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. K.R. acknowledges support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103440; NV INBRE).

K.R., C.S., and P.K.T. also acknowledge Brigham Young University, Julianne Grose, and Daniel Thompson for help in obtaining scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, Findley AM, Gissendanner CR, Golebiewska UP, Guild N, Hartzog GA, Grillo WH, Hollowell GP, Hughes LE, Johnson A, King RA, Lewis LO, Li W, Rosenzweig F, Rubin MR, Saha MS, Sandoz J, Shaffer CD, Taylor B, Temple L, Vazquez E, Ware VC, Barker LP, Bradley KW, Jacobs-Sera D, Pope WH, Russell DA, Cresawn SG, Lopatto D, Bailey CP, Hatfull GF. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01051-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dedrick RM, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Garlena RA, Russell DA, Ford K, Harris K, Gilmour KC, Soothill J, Jacobs-Sera D, Schooley RT, Hatfull GF, Spencer H. 2019. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Med 25:730–733. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395–409. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Casjens SR, Gilcrease EB. 2009. Determining DNA packaging strategy by analysis of the termini of the chromosomes in tailed-bacteriophage virions. Methods Mol Biol 502:91–111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA Master: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 1681: 217–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

GenBank and SRA accession numbers are listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES