Abstract
Background:
Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among adults. The most effective strategy for preventing influenza is annual vaccination. However, vaccination coverage has been suboptimal among adult populations.
Purpose:
To assess trends in influenza vaccination among adult populations.
Methods:
Data from the 2010–2016 National Health Interview Survey were analyzed in 2018 to estimate vaccination coverage during the 2010–11 through 2015–16 seasons. Trends of vaccination in recent years were assessed. Vaccination coverage by race/ethnicity within each group was assessed. Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal models were conducted to assess factors associated with vaccination, and interactions between race/ethnicity and other demographic and access-to-care characteristics were assessed.
Results:
Vaccination coverage among adults aged ≥18 years increased from 38.3% in the 2010–11 to 43.4% in the 2015–16 season, with an average increase of 1.3 percentage points annually. From the 2010–11 through 2015–16 seasons, coverage was stable for adults aged ≥65 years, and changed by −0.1–9.9 percentage points for all other subgroups examined. Coverage in 2015–16 was 70.4% for adults aged ≥65 years, 46.4% for those aged 50–64 years, and 32.3% for those aged 18–49 years; 47.9% for persons aged 18–64 years with high-risk conditions; 64.8% for HCP; and 50.3% for pregnant women. Among adults aged ≥18 years for the 2015–16 season, coverage was significantly lower among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic whites.
Conclusions:
Overall, influenza vaccination coverage among adults aged ≥18 years increased during 2010–2016 but still remained below the national target of 70%. Vaccination coverage varied by age, risk status, race/ethnicity, and HCP and pregnancy status. Targeted efforts are needed to improve coverage and reduce disparities.
Keywords: influenza vaccine, health care personnel, vaccination, coverage, high-risk conditions, pregnant women, trends
Introduction
Annual influenza epidemics typically occur during the late fall through early spring in the United States. Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among adults.1–4 The Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) estimates that influenza has resulted in between 140,000 and 960,000 hospitalizations annually since 2010.2 Influenza-associated respiratory & circulatory (R&C) deaths have ranged from a low of 12,000 (during 2011–12) to a high of 79,000 (during 2017–18).2 Influenza illness burden among healthy adults aged 18–49 years is an important cause of outpatient medical visits and loss of workdays.5, 6 Influenza vaccination is a cost-effective tool for reducing morbidity and mortality associated with influenza among adults.5, 7–19 Since the 2010–11 influenza season, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged ≥6 months.1
Influenza vaccination by race/ethnicity, access-to-care, and other factors among adults were reported previously indicating that vaccination coverage was suboptimal.1, 20–26 However, trends of vaccination coverage in recent years and assessment of factors independently associated with vaccination using recent data are limited.1, 20–26 The objective of this study is to examine the following questions using the 2010–2016 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): (1) What is the influenza vaccination coverage among adult populations in the 2015-16 season? (2) What are the coverage trends for recent years among persons aged ≥18, 18–49, 50–64, ≥65 years, those with high-risk conditions, health care personnel (HCP), and pregnant women? Does vaccination coverage significantly increase or plateau in recent years? (3) What kinds of factors are independently associated with vaccination in recent years among adults aged ≥18 years?
Methods
Data from the 2010–2016 NHIS were analyzed in 2018. The NHIS is a national cross-sectional household survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics.27 The survey samples civilian, non-institutionalized populations living in the United States at the time of the survey. Face-to-face interviews are conducted weekly throughout the year among a probability sample of U.S. households. Final response rates for the core survey sample of adults ranged from 54.3% in 2016 to 66.3% in 2011.28, 29
Seasonal influenza vaccination status was assessed by asking respondents whether they had received influenza vaccine during the past 12 months and in what month and year the vaccine was received. High-risk persons were defined as individuals who self-reported one or more of the following: ever being told by a physician they had diabetes, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack, or other heart condition; being diagnosed with cancer in the past 12 months (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or ever being told by a physician they had lymphoma, leukemia, or blood cancer; during the past 12 months, being told by a physician they had chronic bronchitis or weak or failing kidneys; or reporting an asthma episode or attack in the past 12 months.1, 19, 24 Information on COPD was not collected in the NHIS during 2010–2011. Persons with those high-risk conditions are at increased risk for severe complications from influenza.1, 19, 24
The sample of pregnant women for this analysis included female respondents aged 18-49 years who would have been pregnant at any time during August–March of each respective influenza season. HCP were defined as adults aged ≥18 years who reported they currently volunteered or worked in a hospital, medical clinic, doctor’s office, dentist’s office, nursing home, or some other health care facility, including part-time and unpaid work in a health care facility as well as professional nursing care provided in the home.
SUDAAN software (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, version 11.0.1), a statistical tool for complex sample surveys, was used to calculate point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The sample population of this study was described. In bivariate analyses, influenza vaccination coverage among adults was stratified by demographic and access-to-care characteristics. To better assess influenza vaccination coverage for each season, analysis of season-specific coverage was restricted to individuals interviewed during August through–June, and vaccinated during July–May, using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis procedure. For example, respondents interviewed during August 2015 through June 2016 were analyzed to estimate influenza vaccination received during July 2015 through May 2016. For the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, vaccination month is the time-to-event variable. Time-to-event variable considered censored if a person was not vaccinated by month of interview, or person vaccinated in same month as interviewed. Time-to-event variable is considered not censored if a person was vaccinated in a month prior to month of interview. T-tests for linear trends in recent years were conducted for each group, and for comparison between persons with and without high-risk conditions. All analyses were weighted to reflect the age, sex, and race/ethnicity of the U.S. non-institutionalized, civilian population. Multivariable logistic regression and predictive marginal models were used to generate adjusted vaccination coverage and prevalence ratios, and identify variables independently associated with influenza vaccination. The variables selected in the model were covariates which may be associated with vaccination coverage empirically or based on previous studies.20–24 For multivariable logistic regression, the data were restricted to individuals interviewed during August 2015 through June 2016, and the outcome variable was whether individuals received influenza vaccination in the past 12 months or not. Overall, 8.1% of participants are missing from logistic regression model. Interactions between race/ethnicity and other demographic and access-to-care characteristics were assessed. All tests were 2-tailed with the significance level set at α<0.05.
In the 2010–11 through the 2015–16 seasons, the NHIS analytic sample size ranged from 28,445 to 33,126 adults. Individuals who refused to answer the influenza vaccination question or did not know their vaccination status (about 1.6% annually) were excluded from the analysis. Vaccination month and year were imputed for individuals who reported they received vaccination but did not report their month and year of vaccination (about 3.8% annually).
Results
Sample characteristics of the study population by age and high-risk status are given in Table 1. During the 2010–11 through 2015–16 influenza seasons, the prevalence of high-risk conditions ranged from 13.0% to 14.0%, and 30.8% to 31.9% for adults aged 18-49 years and 50-64 years, respectively. During the 2010–11 through 2015–16 influenza seasons, the proportion of persons in the samples who were classified as HCP ranged from 8.1% to 8.7%. The proportion of pregnant women (18–49 years) among the adult (aged ≥18 years) population was 2.0% for all influenza seasons assessed (Table 1).
Table 1.
Subgroup and age group (years) | Influenza season a |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013 | 2013-2014 | 2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | |||||||
No. of Persons | Weighted % | No. of Persons | Weighted % | No. of Persons | Weighted % | No. of Persons | Weighted % | No. of Persons | Weighted % | No. of Persons | Weighted % | |
All participants | ||||||||||||
≥18 | 28,445 | 100.0 | 30,194 | 100.0 | 31,077 | 100.0 | 33,126 | 100.0 | 32,790 | 100.0 | 29,345 | 100.0 |
18-64 | 22,574 | 82.9 | 23,835 | 82.5 | 24,233 | 81.9 | 25,555 | 81.4 | 24,839 | 81.0 | 21,602 | 80.4 |
18-49 | 15,635 | 57.5 | 16,094 | 56.7 | 16,268 | 56.0 | 17,008 | 55.4 | 16,385 | 55.1 | 14,021 | 54.8 |
50-64 | 6,939 | 25.4 | 7,741 | 25.7 | 7,965 | 25.9 | 8,547 | 25.9 | 8,454 | 25.9 | 7,581 | 25.6 |
≥65 | 5,871 | 17.1 | 6,359 | 17.5 | 6,844 | 18.1 | 7,571 | 18.6 | 7,951 | 19.0 | 7,743 | 19.6 |
Race/ethnicity (aged ≥18 years) | ||||||||||||
Non-Hispanic White | 16,568 | 68.2 | 17,954 | 67.1 | 18,542 | 66.3 | 20,321 | 66.0 | 20,368 | 65.3 | 19,406 | 64.5 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 4,351 | 11.3 | 4,430 | 11.4 | 4,510 | 11.4 | 4,562 | 11.5 | 4,310 | 11.6 | 3,472 | 11.6 |
Hispanic | 5,163 | 13.8 | 5,327 | 14.6 | 5,406 | 15.0 | 5,490 | 15.0 | 5,489 | 15.4 | 4,044 | 15.7 |
Other | 2,363 | 6.6 | 2,483 | 6.9 | 2,619 | 7.3 | 2,753 | 7.4 | 2,623 | 7.7 | 2,423 | 8.2 |
Person with high-risk conditions b | ||||||||||||
18-64 | 4,478 | 19.5 | 4,704 | 19.1 | 4,853 | 18.9 | 5,175 | 19.0 | 5,021 | 18.9 | 4,389 | 18.9 |
18-49 | 2,178 | 14.0 | 2,184 | 13.6 | 2,264 | 13.4 | 2,352 | 13.5 | 2,257 | 13.0 | 1,927 | 13.0 |
50-64 | 2,300 | 31.9 | 2,520 | 31.3 | 2,589 | 30.8 | 2,823 | 30.9 | 2,764 | 31.3 | 2,462 | 31.4 |
Health-care personnel (≥18 years) c | 2,300 | 8.2 d | 2,541 | 8.5 d | 2,597 | 8.7 d | 2,651 | 8.2 d | 2,646 | 8.4 d | 2,458 | 8.1 d |
Pregnant women (18-49 years) e | NA | NA | NA | NA | 697 | 2.0 f | 712 | 2.0f | 655 | 2.0 f | 559 | 2.0 f |
Estimates are based on interviews conducted during August-June for each influenza season (e.g., the 2010-2011 season included persons interviewed from August 2010 through June 2011, and vaccination received during July 2010-May 2011).
Adults categorized as being at high risk for influenza-related complications reported 1 or more of the following: 1) ever being told by a physician that they had diabetes, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, starting from the 2012-13 season), coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack, or another heart condition; 2) receiving a diagnosis of cancer during the preceding 12 months (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or ever being told by a physician that they had lymphoma, leukemia, or blood cancer; 3) being told by a physician that they had chronic bronchitis or weak or failing kidneys during the preceding 12 months; or 4 ) reporting an asthma episode or attack during the preceding 12 months. In addition, the weighted percentage is prevalence of high-risk conditions by age groups.
Adults were classified as health-care personnel if they reported they currently volunteer or work in a hospital, medical clinic, doctor’s office, dentist’s office, nursing home or some other health care facility including part-time and unpaid work in a health care facility as well as professional nursing care provided in the home.
Percentage of adults aged ≥18 years who were health-care personnel.
Adult women were classified as pregnant if they reported they were pregnant anytime during August through March for each influenza season. Data were not available for the 2010-11 and 2011-12 influenza seasons.
Percentage of pregnant women among adults aged ≥18 years.
Overall, influenza vaccination coverage among adults aged ≥18 years, 18–64 years, and 18–49 years increased significantly from 38.3%, 31.7%, and 26.3%, respectively in the 2010–11 season to 43.4%, 36.8%, and 32.3%, respectively in the 2015–16 season, with respective annual average percentage point increases of 1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.4% (test for trend, P<0.05) (Table 2, Appendix Figure 1). Among adults aged ≥18 years, annual average percentage point increases were 1.2% for non-Hispanic whites, 1.4% for non-Hispanic blacks, and 1.1% for Hispanics (Table 2, Appendix Figure 2). Coverage for adults aged 50–64 and ≥65 years was stable (test for trend, P>0.05).
Table 2.
Subgroup and age group (years) | Influenza Season a |
Total change% b | Average annual change% c | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013 | 2013-2014 | 2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | |||||||||
% | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | |||
All participants | ||||||||||||||
≥18 | 38.3 | (37.4-39.2) | 39.4 | (38.5-40.3) | 42.6 d | (41.6-43.7) | 42.9 | (41.8-44.1) | 44.6 d | (43.6-45.7) | 43.4 | (42.3-44.6) | 5.1 | 1.3 e |
18-64 | 31.7 | (30.7-32.6) | 32.7 | (31.8-33.7) | 36.1 d | (34.9-37.2) | 36.5 | (35.3-37.7) | 37.7 | (36.6-38.8) | 36.8 | (35.5-38.1) | 5.1 | 1.2 e |
18-49 | 26.3 | (25.2-27.4) | 27.3 | (26.2-28.4) | 30.5 d | (29.2-31.9) | 31.3 | (29.9-32.8) | 32.5 | (31.1-34.0) | 32.3 | (30.7-33.9) | 6.0 | 1.4 e |
50-64 | 43.8 | (42.2-45.4) | 44.8 | (42.9-46.7) | 48.0 d | (46.1-50.0) | 47.7 | (45.7-49.7) | 48.7 | (46.6-50.8) | 46.4 | (44.4-48.4) | 2.6 | 0.7 |
≥65 | 70.4 | (68.5-72.3) | 70.2 | (68.3-72.1) | 71.6 | (69.6-73.7) | 71.5 | (69.6-73.3) | 73.5 | (71.7-75.2) | 70.4 d | (68.6-72.2) | 0.0 | 0.3 |
Race/ethnicity (aged ≥18 years) | ||||||||||||||
Non-Hispanic White | 41.1 | (40.0-42.3) | 42.5 | (41.3-43.7) | 46.5 d | (45.2-47.8) | 46.4 | (45.0-47.9) | 48.2 | (46.9-49.5) | 46.1 d | (44.9-47.4) | 5.0 | 1.2 e |
Non-Hispanic Black | 32.4 | (29.8-35.1) | 34.1 | (31.9-36.5) | 33.5 | (30.8-36.3) | 36.5 | (34.2-38.9) | 37.7 | (35.2-40.3) | 39.7 | (36.4-43.2) | 7.3 | 1.4 e |
Hispanic | 29.3 | (27.5-31.2) | 28.5 | (26.3-30.9) | 30.5 | (28.4-32.8) | 32.9 | (30.6-35.4) | 33.3 | (31.2-35.5) | 33.2 | (30.1-36.6) | 3.9 | 1.1e |
Other | 37.8 | (34.3-41.5) | 40.9 | (38.1-43.8) | 46.7 d | (43.6-50.0) | 42.6 | (39.0-46.4) | 47.3 | (43.6-51.2) | 46.7 | (42.6-51.0) | 8.9 | 1.8 |
Person with high-risk conditions g | ||||||||||||||
18-64 | 45.8 f | (43.3-48.4) | 45.1 f | (42.8-47.5) | 49.5 d, f | (47.2-51.9) | 47.2 f | (44.9-49.6) | 46.0 f | (43.5-48.5) | 47.9 f | (45.2-50.7) | 2.1 | 0.3 |
18-49 | 36.9 f | (33.5-40.5) | 36.5 f | (33.1-40.2) | 39.0 f | (35.8-42.4) | 37.5 f | (34.2-41.1) | 35.8 f | (32.6-39.1) | 36.8 f | (33.2-40.6) | −0.1 | −0.1 |
50-64 | 54.6 f | (51.2-58.1) | 53.6 f | (50.6-56.7) | 59.3 d, f | (55.8-62.8) | 56.7 f | (53.7-59.7) | 55.0 f | (51.3-58.8) | 57.4 f | (53.7-61.1) | 2.8 | 0.5 |
Person without high-risk conditions | ||||||||||||||
18-64 | 28.3 | (27.3-29.3) | 29.8 d | (28.8-30.9) | 32.9 d | (31.6-34.2) | 33.9 | (32.6-35.3) | 35.8 d | (34.6-37.0) | 34.1 | (32.7-35.6) | 5.8 | 1.5 e |
18-49 | 24.5 | (23.5-25.6) | 25.8 | (24.7-27.0) | 29.2 d | (27.8-30.7) | 30.3 | (28.8-31.9) | 32.1 | (30.6-33.6) | 31.6 | (29.9-33.3) | 7.1 | 1.7 e |
50-64 | 38.8 | (36.9-40.7) | 40.8 | (38.4-43.2) | 42.8 | (40.5-45.2) | 43.7 | (41.3-46.0) | 45.8 | (43.3-48.4) | 41.1 d | (38.7-43.5) | 2.3 | 0.8 |
Health-care personnel (≥18 years) h | 55.9 | (52.8-59.0) | 61.6 d | (58.5-64.7) | 66.9 d | (63.4-70.3) | 64.9 | (60.5-69.3) | 68.6 | (65.0-72.2) | 64.8 | (61.2-68.4) | 8.9 | 1.9 |
Pregnant women (18-49 years) i | NA | NA | NA | NA | 40.4 | (34.0-47.4) | 45.4 | (38.5-52.8) | 43.1 | (36.0-51.0) | 50.3 | (41.9-59.3) | 9.9 | 2.6 |
Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (P<0.05).
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval
Estimates are based on interviews conducted during August-June for each influenza season (e.g., the 2010-2011 season included persons interviewed from August 2010 through June 2011, and vaccination received during July 2010-May 2011).
Total change from the 2010-2011 season to the 2015-2016 season. Change from the 2012-2013 to 2015-2016 seasons for pregnant women (data were not available prior to the 2012-13 season).
Average annual change from the 2010-2011 season to the 2015-2016 season, estimated by weighted linear regression. Change from the 2012-2013 to 2015-2016 seasons for pregnant women (data were not available prior to the 2012-13 season).
P< 0.05 for comparison with the previous season (t test for comparison between 2 seasons, with the prior season as the reference group- for example, 2011-2012 vs. 2010-2011, 2012-2013 vs. 2011-2012, 2013-2014 vs. 2012-2013, 2014-2015 vs. 2013-2014, and 2015-2016 vs. 2014-2015).
P< 0.05 for overall trend (Linear trend test for trend from the 2010-2011 season through the 2015-2016 season).
P< 0.05 for comparison between high-risk and low-risk participants (t test for comparison between persons with high-risk conditions and persons without high-risk conditions within the same age group in each season).
Adults categorized as being at high risk for influenza-related complications reported 1 or more of the following: 1) ever being told by a physician that they had diabetes, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, starting from the 2012-13 season), coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack, or another heart condition; 2) receiving a diagnosis of cancer during the preceding 12 months (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or ever being told by a physician that they had lymphoma, leukemia, or blood cancer; 3) being told by a physician that they had chronic bronchitis or weak or failing kidneys during the preceding 12 months; or 4 ) reporting an asthma episode or attack during the preceding 12 months.
Adults were classified as health-care personnel if they reported they currently volunteer or work in a hospital, medical clinic, doctor’s office, dentist’s office, nursing home or some other health care facility including part-time and unpaid work in a health care facility as well as professional nursing care provided in the home.
Adult women were classified as pregnant if they reported they were pregnant anytime during August through March for each influenza season. Data were not available for 2010-11 and 2011-12 influenza seasons.
Among adults with high-risk conditions, influenza vaccination coverage for adults aged 18–64 years, 18–49 years, and 50–64 years was stable during the 2010–11 through 2015–16 seasons (test for trend, P>0.05) (Table 2, Appendix Figure 1). Among adults without high-risk conditions, influenza vaccination coverage for adults aged 18–64 years and those aged 18–49 years significantly increased from 28.3% and 24.5%, respectively, in the 2010–11 season to 34.1% and 31.6%, respectively, in the 2015–16 season, with a respective annual average percentage point increase of 1.5%, and 1.7% (test for trend, P<0.05) (Table 2, Appendix Figure 1). For all years, within each age group, vaccination coverage was significantly lower among those without high-risk conditions compared with those with high-risk conditions (Table 2, Appendix Figure 1).
Influenza vaccination coverage for the 2015-16 season was 64.8% for HCP and 50.3% for pregnant women (Table 2). Linear trends for both groups were not statistically significant (Table 2, Appendix Figure 1). Among HCP, coverage increased from 55.9% in 2010-11 to 61.6% in 2011-12 and 66.9% in 2012-2013, and then ranged from 64.8 to 68.6 in subsequent seasons.
Influenza vaccination coverage for the 2015-16 season by race and ethnicity, age group, and high-risk status are shown in Table 3. For the 2015–16 season, vaccination coverage was significantly lower for non-Hispanic blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites among those aged ≥18 years (39.7% versus 46.1%, respectively) and ≥65 years (65.1% versus 72.0%, respectively) (Table 3). Coverage for the 2015–16 season among adults aged 18–64 years with high-risk conditions was similar across racial/ethnic groups. Vaccination coverage was significantly lower for Hispanics compared with non-Hispanic whites in all age sub-groups and among persons who reported having no high-risk conditions (Table 3). For the 2015–16 season, influenza vaccination coverage among HCP was significantly lower for non-Hispanic black HCP (56.7%) compared with non-Hispanic white HCP (66.7%) (Table 3). For the 2015–16 season, influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women was significantly lower for non-Hispanic black (31.3%) and Hispanic pregnant women (36.1%) compared with non-Hispanic white pregnant women (63.6%) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Subgroup and age group (years) | Race/Ethnicity |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Hispanic White | Non-Hispanic Black | Hispanics | Other b | |||||
% | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | |
All participants | ||||||||
≥18 | 46.1 | (44.9-47.4) | 39.7 c | (36.4-43.2) | 33.2 c | (30.1-36.6) | 46.7 | (42.6-51.0) |
18-64 | 38.2 | (36.7-39.7) | 35.3 | (31.7-39.1) | 30.1 c | (26.9-33.7) | 42.3 | (37.9-47.1) |
18-49 | 33.3 | (31.4-35.2) | 31.3 | (27.0-36.1) | 27.5 c | (23.7-31.9) | 37.0 | (32.5-41.9) |
50-64 | 46.7 | (44.6-48.9) | 44.7 | (39.0-50.7) | 39.7 c | (33.8-46.2) | 56.4 c | (47.7-65.4) |
≥65 | 72.0 | (69.9-74.0) | 65.1c | (59.2-70.9) | 60.0 c | (52.3-67.8) | 74.2 | (66.2-81.5) |
Person with high-risk condition d | ||||||||
18-64 | 47.8 | (44.7-51.1) | 48.8 | (41.8-56.4) | 46.3 | (39.1-5 4.2) | 50.6 | (40.0-62.1) |
18-49 | 37.8 | (33.6-42.4) | 39.5 | (29.7-51.1) | 33.1 | (23.3-45.5) | 34.9 | (24.5-48.1) |
50-64 | 55.6 | (51.2-60.0) | 57.3 | (47.2-67.8) | 60.6 | (50.7-70.6) | 67.4 | (51.8-82.2) |
Person without high-risk condition | ||||||||
18-64 | 35.8 | (34.1-37.5) | 31.7 | (27.9-35.9) | 27.0 c | (23.3-31.2) | 40.3 | (35.9-45.1) |
18-49 | 32.6 | (30.5-34.7) | 30.1 | (25.6-35.3) | 26.9 c | (22.8-31.5) | 37.2 | (32.4-42.3) |
50-64 | 42.8 | (40.2-45.4) | 36.8 | (30.0-44.5) | 27.3 c | (21.1-35.0) | 51.0 | (40.9-62.0) |
Health-care personnel (≥18 years) e | 66.7 | (62.7-70.6) | 56.7 c | (47.8-66.0) | 59.4 | (47.4-71.8) | 70.9 | (56.4-84.0) |
Pregnant women (18-49 years) f | 63.6 | (52.0-75.0) | 31.3 c | (17.0-53.0) | 36.1 c | (21.0-57.4) | 42.5 | (22.2-70.4) |
Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (P<0.05).
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval
Estimates are based on interviews conducted during August 2015-June 2016 and vaccination received during July 2015-May 2016.
Included Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and multiple races.
P< 0.05 for race/ethnicity (t test for comparison with non-Hispanic whites).
Adults categorized as being at high risk for influenza-related complications reported 1 or more of the following: 1) ever being told by a physician that they had diabetes, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, starting from the 2012-13 season), coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack, or another heart condition; 2) receiving a diagnosis of cancer during the preceding 12 months (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or ever being told by a physician that they had lymphoma, leukemia, or blood cancer; 3) being told by a physician that they had chronic bronchitis or weak or failing kidneys during the preceding 12 months; or 4 ) reporting an asthma episode or attack during the preceding 12 months.
Adults were classified as health-care personnel if they reported they currently volunteer or work in a hospital, medical clinic, doctor’s office, dentist’s office, nursing home or some other health care facility including part-time and unpaid work in a health care facility as well as professional nursing care provided in the home.
Adult women were classified as pregnant if they reported they were pregnant anytime during August through March.
Three interactions including race/ethnicity and age group, race/ethnicity and educational level, and race/ethnicity and the U.S.-born status were significant in the multivariable logistic model. Multivariable analysis showed that, when three interactions were also adjusted in the model, characteristics independently associated with increased likelihood of vaccination among adults aged ≥18 years were Asian race (among those aged 18–64 years, those with less than college education, or those who were born in the U.S. or born outside of the U.S. and stayed in the U.S. ≥10 years), being married, not being employed, having ≥1 physician contact within the past year, being hospitalized in the past 12 months, having high-risk conditions, having a usual place for health care, having health insurance, and being an HCP (Table 4). Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to be vaccinated (among those aged ≥65 years, those with some college or college education, or those who were born in the U.S.) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Characteristic | Adjusted coverage % (95% CI) a | Prevalence ratio (95% CI) b | |
---|---|---|---|
Age and race/ethnicity | |||
18-49 | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 34.0 (32.4-35.6) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 33.7 (30.6-37.0) | 0.99 (0.90-1.10) | |
Hispanic | 34.1 (31.2-37.1) | 1.00 (0.91-1.10) | |
Asian | 47.8 (41.5-54.1) | 1.40 (1.22-1.62) c | |
Other | 32.8 (27.0-39.3) | 0.97 (0.79-1.17) | |
50-64 | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 42.1 (40.2-44.0) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 38.4 (34.1-42.9) | 0.91 (0.81-1.03) | |
Hispanic | 38.9 (34.3-43.7) | 0.92 (0.82-1.05) | |
Asian | 53.7 (44.4-62.7) | 1.28 (1.07-1.53) c | |
Other | 52.3 (42.2-62.2) | 1.24 (1.02-1.52) | |
≥65 | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 59.5 (57.3-61.6) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 53.4 (48.5-58.1) | 0.90 (0.82-0.98) c | |
Hispanic | 49.4 (43.8-54.9) | 0.83 (0.74-0.93) c | |
Asian | 64.7 (55.9-72.7) | 1.09 (0.95-1.25) | |
Other | 59.3 (47.6-69.9) | 1.00 (0.82-1.21) | |
Sex | |||
Male | 42.0 (40.8-43.2) | 0.99 (0.96-1.03) | |
Female | 42.2 (41.1-43.4) | Reference | |
Marital status | |||
Married | 44.3 (43.1-45.4) | 1.14 (1.09-1.20) c | |
Widowed/divorced/separated | 40.8 (39.2-42.4) | 1.05 (1.00-1.12) | |
Never married | 38.7 (37.1-40.4) | Reference | |
Education and race/ethnicity | |||
High school or less | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 37.4 (35.7-39.1) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 36.6 (33.2-40.1) | 0.98 (0.88-1.08) | |
Hispanic | 38.9 (35.8-42.0) | 1.04 (0.95-1.14) | |
Asian | 49.0 (40.5-57.5) | 1.31 (1.09-1.57) c | |
Other | 37.8 (30.5-45.7) | 1.01 (0.82-1.24) | |
Some college or college graduate | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 41.4 (40.0-42.8) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 38.0 (34.9-41.1) | 0.92 (0.84-1.00) c | |
Hispanic | 37.3 (33.9-40.8) | 0.90 (0.82-0.99) c | |
Asian | 54.4 (48.7-60.1) | 1.31 (1.18-1.47) c | |
Other | 47.5 (40.8-54.3) | 1.15 (0.99-1.33) | |
Above college graduate | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 52.1 (49.6-54.6) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 50.2 (42.9-57.4) | 0.96 (0.83-1.12) | |
Hispanic | 42.8 (34.4-51.5) | 0.82 (0.67-1.01) c | |
Asian | 54.9 (47.1-62.5) | 1.05 (0.91-1.22) | |
Other | 42.4 (30.2-55.5) | 0.81 (0.59-1.11) | |
Employment status | |||
Employed | 40.6 (39.5-41.7) | Reference | |
Not employed | 44.5 (43.1-45.9) | 1.10 (1.05-1.14) c | |
Poverty level | |||
At or above poverty | 42.3 (41.3-43.3) | 1.04 (0.99-1.10) | |
Below poverty | 40.7 (38.6-42.7) | Reference | |
Region | |||
Northeast | 42.9 (40.7-45.2) | Reference | |
Midwest | 41.7 (40.2-43.2) | 0.97 (0.91-1.03) | |
South | 41.8 (40.4-43.3) | 0.97 (0.92-1.03) | |
West | 42.3 (40.7-44.0) | 0.99 (0.93-1.05) | |
US born status and race/ethnicity | |||
U.S. born | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 42.7 (41.7-43.8) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 38.0 (35.7-40.3) | 0.89 (0.83-0.95) c | |
Hispanic | 38.6 (35.8-41.6) | 0.90 (0.84-0.98) c | |
Asian | 53.7 (46.9-60.3) | 1.26 (1.11-1.43) c | |
Other | 41.8 (36.8-47.0) | 0.98 (0.86-1.11) | |
Born outside U.S.-- In U.S. < 10 yrs | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 31.8 (21.7-43.9) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 53.1 (42.2-63.7) | 1.67 (1.11-2.52) c | |
Hispanic | 39.1 (31.9-46.8) | 1.23 (0.82-1.84) | |
Asian | 41.9 (34.8-49.4) | 1.32 (0.88-1.98) | |
Other | 43.2 (19.2-70.9) | 1.36 (0.64-2.87) | |
Born outside U.S.-- In U.S. ≥ 10 yrs | |||
Non-Hispanic White | 34.9 (30.4-39.7) | Reference | |
Non-Hispanic Black | 41.8 (33.2-50.9) | 1.20 (0.93-1.54) | |
Hispanic | 37.9 (34.6-41.3) | 1.09 (0.93-1.27) | |
Asian | 48.4 (43.7-53.1) | 1.39 (1.18-1.63) c | |
Other | 52.3 (37.0-67.1) | 1.50 (1.09-2.06) c | |
Physician contacts within past year | |||
None | 28.9 (26.9-31.1) | Reference | |
1 | 37.2 (35.4-39.0) | 1.28 (1.18-1.40) c | |
2-3 | 43.3 (41.8-44.8) | 1.50 (1.38-1.62) c | |
4-9 | 47.3 (45.6-49.0) | 1.63 (1.50-1.78) c | |
≥10 | 50.1 (47.9-52.4) | 1.73 (1.58-1.89) c | |
Hospitalization within past year | |||
Yes | 46.9 (44.4-49.3) | 1.13 (1.06-1.19) c | |
No | 41.6 (40.7-42.6) | Reference | |
Usual place for health care | |||
Yes | 43.3 (42.3-44.2) | 1.37 (1.26-1.48) c | |
No | 31.7 (29.2-34.3) | Reference | |
Health insurance | |||
Yes | 43.0 (42.0-43.9) | 1.39 (1.27-1.53) c | |
No | 30.9 (28.1-33.8) | Reference | |
Healthcare personnel | |||
Yes | 65.1 (62.5-67.7) | 1.63 (1.56-1.70) c | |
No | 39.9 (39.0-40.8) | Reference | |
Person with high-risk conditions d | |||
Yes | 46.3 (44.7-47.9) | 1.14 (1.09-1.18) c | |
No | 40.7 (39.7-41.7) | Reference |
Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (P<0.05).
Adjusted coverage, adjusted for all variables included in the table, and interactions including age groups and race/ethnicity , education and race/ethnicity, and the U.S.- born status and race/ethnicity.
Adjusted prevalence ratios, adjusted for all variables included in the table, and interactions including age groups and race/ethnicity, education and race/ethnicity, and U.S. born status and race/ethnicity.
P< 0.05 by t- test for comparison within each covariate category with the indicated reference level.
Adults categorized as being at high risk for influenza-related complications reported 1 or more of the following: 1) ever being told by a physician that they had diabetes, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, starting from the 2012-13 season), coronary heart disease, angina, heart attack, or another heart condition; 2) receiving a diagnosis of cancer during the preceding 12 months (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or ever being told by a physician that they had lymphoma, leukemia, or blood cancer; 3) being told by a physician that they had chronic bronchitis or weak or failing kidneys during the preceding 12 months; or 4 ) reporting an asthma episode or attack during the preceding 12 months.
Discussion
Overall, influenza vaccination coverage among adults aged ≥18 years increased during these survey seasons but was still below the national target of 70%.30 Vaccination coverage varied widely by age, risk status, race/ethnicity, and HCP and pregnancy status. Vaccination coverage among all groups recommended for vaccination remains suboptimal, including HCP and pregnant women. Targeted efforts are needed to improve coverage and reduce disparities.
By the 2015–16 season (five seasons after annual influenza vaccination was recommended for all adults), vaccination coverage among adults aged ≥18 years was 43.4%, with vaccination coverage estimates steadily increasing from the 2010–11 through the 2015–16 seasons. Vaccination coverage also increased steadily during 2010–11 through 2015–16 among healthy adults (those without high-risk conditions) aged 18–49 years, with an annual average increase of 1.7 percentage points. In 2010, healthy adults aged 18–49 years were included for the first time among those for whom annual vaccination is recommended by ACIP.1 This group was added given the substantial morbidity and economic impact of influenza in working-age adults.5, 6, 12 Previous studies indicated that higher vaccination coverage could have prevented a substantial number of influenza cases and hospitalizations.31, 32
Influenza vaccination coverage among adults aged 18–64 years with high-risk conditions remains suboptimal. In 2015–16, only 47.9% had received the vaccination, and vaccination coverage did not significantly increase during the 2010–11 through 2015–16 influenza seasons. There may be several factors associated with lower influenza vaccination coverage among adults with high-risk conditions. There might not be a preexisting relationship between state immunization programs and providers who serve adults at high risk. Persons with underlying health conditions might not consider themselves as high risk, limiting the effectiveness of targeted messages. Finally, many people with high-risk conditions see subspecialists, but subspecialists are less likely to recommend influenza vaccination than general practitioners.20, 33–35 Additionally, one previous study showed that 90% of unvaccinated high-risk individuals may have missed at least one potential opportunity for receiving vaccination,36 which could result in lower vaccination coverage and put those unvaccinated individuals at risk.25, 36 Even though the influenza vaccination recommendation was expanded to include all persons aged ≥6 months in the 2010–11 season, the ACIP continued to emphasize that persons with high-risk conditions should be a focus of vaccination efforts.1
Our study showed that vaccination coverage for adults aged ≥65 years has plateaued in recent years. The lack of change in influenza vaccination coverage in this age group indicates that new approaches are needed to increase influenza vaccination. One study indicated that adults aged ≥65 years are more likely to receive their influenza vaccination in a clinical setting than younger adults.37 An increase in vaccination in alternative settings (e.g., community immunizers, health department clinics, pharmacies, and educational settings) may help improve influenza vaccination; however, individuals must be motivated to seek out vaccination. A provider’s recommendation remains one of the most important determinants of vaccination. However, one recent study indicated that only about 51% of adults aged ≥65 years received a vaccination recommendation from a provider.38 Adults aged ≥65 years are likely to be at highest risk of influenza complications and more likely to have a chance to visit a doctor.1
Findings from this study showed that, for persons aged ≥18 years, influenza vaccination among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and others significantly increased over these survey seasons, but in the 2015–16 season racial/ethnic disparities, especially vaccination differences between older Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks compared with whites, still remained. Racial/ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination have been described in previous studies.21–22, 25, 39 Multiple factors likely contribute to racial and ethnic differences in adult vaccination, including differences in attitudes toward vaccination and preventive care, propensity to seek and accept vaccination, variations in the likelihood that providers recommend vaccination, differences in quality of care received by racial and ethnic populations, differences in access to healthcare, differences in concerns about vaccination, including vaccine safety21–22, 25, 39–42, and differences in perceived discrimination in the healthcare system.43
Substantial improvement in annual influenza vaccination of adults is needed to maximally reduce the health impact of influenza. Primary care providers, subspecialists, and pharmacists should routinely recommend and offer vaccinations when all adult patients access the medical system.44 Use of standing-order programs can help reduce the number of missed opportunities for vaccination of individuals who have already accessed the medical system and should be instituted in all health care settings, including inpatient and outpatient settings.44 Incorporating the standards of practice for adult immunizations, which include routinely assessing vaccination needs during clinical encounters, providing a strong recommendation for vaccination to patients in need of vaccines, and then offering vaccination at the visit, can have a significant impact on coverage and reduce disparities.44
Additionally, several demographic and access-to-care characteristics such as employment, number of physician contacts in the past 12 months, hospitalization status, having high-risk conditions, having a usual place for health care, having health insurance, and being HCP were independently associated with vaccination in this study, similar to findings from previous reports.36, 38–41, 44 Intervention programs should target groups where vaccination coverage was low.
Influenza vaccination coverage ranged 56-69% among HCP over six seasons, and coverage among HCP was only 64.8% in 2015–16, well below the Healthy People 2020 target of 90%.30 Employers and health care administrators should implement evidence-based interventions to increase influenza vaccination coverage among HCP, including on-site vaccination at no or low cost to HCP.45, 46 The highest influenza vaccination coverage among HCP continues to be reported in worksites with employer requirements for vaccination.47 Such requirements could significantly improve influenza vaccination coverage among HCP.46 Additional approaches include electronic tracking of coverage levels by ward, unit, and occupation; a mandatory declination policy; mask-wearing for non-vaccinated HCP; highly visible acknowledgement of vaccinated HCP; weekly compliance reports to managers and other administrators; disciplinary measures for noncompliant HCP; vaccination stations at facility entrances; and employee financial incentives for achieving high facility vaccination rates.45–48
Vaccination could help protect pregnant women and also protect their baby for several months after birth.49 However, only half of pregnant women reported receiving influenza vaccination during the 2015–16 season. Pregnant women’s low awareness of their increased risk for complications from influenza infection and misconceptions about vaccination safety and effectiveness have been reported as barriers to vaccination uptake.50–52 Lower coverage among non-Hispanic black or Hispanic women compared with white women might be partly because of differences in socio-economic norms and differences in access to vaccines and healthcare services.50, 52, 53 Provider recommendations and offers of vaccination have been reported as the strongest predictor for vaccination acceptance among pregnant women.48 Positive attitudes toward and advocacy of influenza vaccination among physicians may facilitate counseling, discussion, and recommendation of vaccination to pregnant women and help increase vaccination acceptance and uptake.54
In the 2015-16 season, coverage from NHIS (43.0% for adults aged ≥18 years, 64.8% for HCP, and 50.3% for pregnant women) differ from other estimates based on surveys including Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (41.7% for adults aged ≥18 years), and Internet panel surveys (IPS) for pregnant women (49.9%) and healthcare personnel (79.0%).29 Differences in estimates across these surveys might be due to different sampling frame, survey mode, survey questions, order of survey questions, operations, response rates, and weighting.55
Several limitations should be considered in interpreting these results. First, information on influenza vaccination was self-reported and may be subject to recall bias. However, self-reported seasonal influenza vaccination status has been shown to have relatively high agreement with vaccination status ascertained from medical records.56–59 Second, high-risk conditions were self-reported and not validated by medical record. Third, the analyses in this study generated results that are associative and not causal. Fourth, the sampling redesign of the 2016 NHIS may have impact on influenza vaccination coverage estimates. Finally, other factors associated with vaccination were not measured by the NHIS (e.g., concerns of vaccine safety or effectiveness) and could not be ascertained in this analysis.
Influenza vaccination coverage among persons aged ≥18 years, HCP, and pregnant women remained suboptimal. Vaccination coverage varied by age, risk status, race/ethnicity, and HCP and pregnancy status. Substantial improvement in annual influenza vaccination is needed to maximally reduce the health impact of influenza. Expanded access through greater use of complimentary settings and vaccine providers,44 and better use of evidence-based practices at medical sites (e.g., standing orders, and reminder/recall notification) are important to improve influenza vaccination coverage further.46
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
Authors thank Mary Ann Hall for her review of this manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CDC.
Conflict of Interest Statement:
All authors have no conflicts of interest to be stated.
References
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR 2010; 59(RR08);1–62. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Estimated influenza illnesses, medical visits, hospitalizations, and deaths averted by vaccination in the United States. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html Accessed December 7, 2018.
- 3.Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Influenza-associated hospitalization in the United States. JAMA 2004;292:1333–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bridges CB, Katz JM, Levandowski RL, Cox NJ. Inactivated influenza vaccine Vaccines (2007), fifth edition, pp 259–290. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, et al. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000;284:1655–1663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Molinari NA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, et al. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine 2007;25:5086–5096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mullooly JP, Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Chen J, Weintraub E, Jackson LA, et al. Influenza- and RSV-associated hospitalizations among adults. Vaccine 2007;25:846–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kissling E, Valenciano M; I-MOVE case-control studies team. Early estimates of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness in Europe among target groups for vaccination: results from the I-MOVE multicenter case-control study, 2011/12. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(15) pii: 20146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jimenez-Jorge S, de Mateo S, Pozo F, Casas I, Garcia Cenoz M, Castilla J, et al. Early estimates of the effectiveness of the 2011/12 influenza vaccine in the population targeted for vaccination in Spain, 25 December 2011 to 19 February 2012. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(12) pii: 20129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vu T, Farish S, Jenkins M, Kelly H. A meta-analysis of effectiveness of influenza vaccine in persons aged 65 years and over living in the community. Vaccine 2002;20:1831–1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Govaert TM, Thijs CT, Masurel N, Sprenger MJ, Dinant GJ, Knottnerus JA. The efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly individuals. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. JAMA 1994;272(21):1661–1665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gatwood J, Meltzer MI, Messonnier M, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Balkrishnan R, Prosser LA. Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthy working-age adults: a review of economic evaluations. Drugs 2012;72(1):35–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fireman B, Lee J, Lewis N, Bembom O, van der Laan M, Baxter R. Influenza vaccination and mortality: differentiating vaccine effects from bias. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170(5):650–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fedson DS, Houck P, Bratzler D. Hospital-based influenza and pneumococcal vaccination: Sutton’s law applied to prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:692–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ohmit SE, Victor JC, Rotthoff JR, et al. Prevention of antigenically drifted influenza by inactivated and live attenuated vaccines. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2513–2522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Baguelin M, Jit M, Miller E, Edmunds WJ. Health and economic impact of the seasonal influenza vaccination programme in England. Vaccine 2012;30(23):3459–3462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Williams WW. Managed care can improve pneumococcal and influenza vaccination levels. HMO Pract 1997;11(4):174–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fedson DS. Adult immunization: summary of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee report. JAMA 1994;272:1133–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR 2009; 58(RR08):1–52. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lu PJ, O’Halloran A, Williams WW. Impact of health insurance status on vaccination coverage among adult populations. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(6):647–661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lu PJ, Singleton JA, Rangel MC, Wortley PM, Bridges CB. Influenza vaccination trends among adults 65 years or older in the United States, 1989-2002. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1849–1856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Singleton JA, Santibanez TA, Wortley PM. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of adults aged ≥ 65: racial/ethnic differences. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(5):412–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Walker FJ, Singleton JA, Lu PJ, Wooten KG, Strikas RA. Influenza vaccination of health care workers in the United States, 1989-2002. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:257–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lu PJ, O’Halloran A, Bryan L, Kennedy ED, Ding H, Graitcer SB, et al. Trends in racial/ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among adults during the 2007-08 through 2011-12 seasons. Am J Infect Control. 2014. Jul;42(7):763–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Williams WW, Lu PJ, O’Halloran A, Kim DK, Grohskopf LA, Pilishvili T, et al. Surveillance of vaccination coverage among adult populations - United States, 2015. MMWR. 2017. May 5;66(11):1–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tse SC, Wyatt LC, Trinh-Shevrin C, Kwon SC. Racial/ethnic differences in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates among older adults in New York City and Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Health Interview Survey. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/data-questionnaires-documentation.htm Accessed April 16, 2018 ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2016/srvydesc.pdf
- 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Health Interview Survey. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2016/srvydesc.pdf Accessed April 30.
- 29.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2015-16 flu season. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/1516season.htm Accessed September 5, 2018 16, 2018
- 30.US Department of Health and Human Services. Immunization and infectious diseases. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/immunization-and-infectious-diseases/objectives Accessed April 20, 2018.
- 31.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Estimated influenza illnesses and hospitalizations averted by vaccination—United States, 2013–14 influenza season. MMWR 2014;63:1151–1154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Estimated influenza illnesses, medical visits, and hospitalizations averted by vaccination in the United States, the 2016-17 season. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/2016-17.htm Accessed April 20, 2018.
- 33.Egede LE, Zheng D. Racial/Ethnic differences in influenza vaccination coverage in high-risk adults. Am J Public Health 2003;93:2074–2078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.O’Halloran AC, Lu PJ, Williams WW, Bridges CB, Singleton JA. Influenza vaccination coverage among people with high-risk conditions in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(1):e15–e26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nichol KL, Zimmerman R. Generalist and subspecialist physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations for elderly and other high-risk patients: a nationwide survey. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2702–2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lu PJ, O’Halloran A, Ding H, Srivastav A, Williams WW. Uptake of influenza vaccination and missed opportunities among adults with high-risk conditions, United States, 2013. Am J Med. 2016. June;129(6):636.e1–636.e11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National and state-level place of flu vaccination among vaccinated adults in the United States, 2014–15 flu season. Available at: https://wwwdev.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/place-vaccination-2014-15.htm Accessed May 21, 2018.
- 38.Lu PJ, Srivastav A, Amaya A, Dever JA, Roycroft J, Kurtz MS, et al. Association of provider recommendation and offer and influenza vaccination among adults aged ≥18 years - United States. Vaccine. 2018;36(6):890–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lu PJ, O’Halloran A, Williams WW, Lindley MC, Farrall S, Bridges CB. Racial and ethnic disparities in vaccination coverage among adult populations in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(6 Suppl 4):S412–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lindley MC, Wortley PM, Winston CA, Bardenheier BH. The role of attitudes in understanding disparities in adult influenza vaccination. Am J Prev Med 2006;31:281–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Link MW, Ahluwalia IB, Euler GL, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among adults during the 2004–2005 season. Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:571–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med 2004;351:575–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bleser WK, Miranda PY, Jean-Jacques M. Racial/ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination of chronically ill US adults: the mediating role of perceived discrimination in health care. Med Care. 2016;54(6):570–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: standards for adult immunization practice. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(2):115–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Immunization of health-care personnel: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011. Nov 25;60(RR-7):1–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Guide to Community Preventive Services. Available at: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html Accessed April 23, 2018.
- 47.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel--United States, 2016-17 Influenza Season. MMWR 2017;66(38):1009–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Drees M, Wroten K, Smedley M, Mase T, Schwartz JS. Carrots and sticks: achieving high healthcare personnel influenza vaccination rates without a mandate. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36(6):717–724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Pregnant? Get a Flu Shot! Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/features/pregnancyandflu/index.html Accessed March 1, 2019.
- 50.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women--United States, 2014-15 Influenza Season. MMWR 2015;64:1000–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yuen CY, Tarrant M. Determinants of uptake of influenza vaccination among pregnant women - a systematic review. Vaccine 2014;32:4602–4613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yudin MH, Salaripour M, Sgro MD. Pregnant women’s knowledge of influenza and the use and safety of the influenza vaccine during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009;31:120–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ahluwalia IB Ding H, Harrison L, et al. Disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among women with live-born infants: PRAMS surveillance during the 2009–2010 influenza season. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 (5): 408–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Blanchard-Rohner G, Meier S, Ryser J, Schaller D, Combescure C, Yudin MH, et al. Acceptability of maternal immunization against influenza: the critical role of obstetricians.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(9):1800–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lu PJ, Santibanez TA, Williams WW, Zhang J, Ding H, Bryan L, et al. Surveillance of influenza vaccination coverage - United States, 2007-08 through 2011-12 influenza seasons. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013. October 25;62 Suppl 4:1–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Donald RM, Baken L, Nelson A, Nichol KL. Validation of self-report of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status in elderly outpatients. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(3):173–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zimmerman RK, Raymund M, Janosky JE, Nowalk MP, Fine MJ. Sensitivity and specificity of patient self-report of influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccinations among elderly outpatients in diverse patient care strata. Vaccine 2003; 21:1486–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mangtani P, Shah A, Roberts JA. Validation of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine status in adults based on self-report. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(1):139–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rolnick SJ, Parker ED, Nordin JD, Hedblom BD, Wei F, Kerby T, et al. Self-report compared to electronic medical record across eight adult vaccines: do results vary by demographic factors? Vaccine 2013;31(37):3928–3935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.