Abstract
Osteoporosis deteriorates bone mass and biomechanical strength, becoming a life-threatening cause to the elderly. MicroRNA is known to regulate tissue remodeling; however, its role in the development of osteoporosis remains elusive. In this study, we uncovered that silencing miR-29a expression decreased mineralized matrix production in osteogenic cells, whereas osteoclast differentiation and pit formation were upregulated in bone marrow macrophages as co-incubated with the osteogenic cells in transwell plates. In vivo, decreased miR-29a expression occurred in ovariectomy-mediated osteoporotic skeletons. Mice overexpressing miR-29a in osteoblasts driven by osteocalcin promoter (miR-29aTg/OCN) displayed higher bone mineral density, trabecular volume and mineral acquisition than wild-type mice. The estrogen deficiency-induced loss of bone mass, trabecular morphometry, mechanical properties, mineral accretion and osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal cells were compromised in miR-29aTg/OCN mice. miR-29a overexpression also attenuated the estrogen loss-mediated excessive osteoclast surface histopathology, osteoclast formation of bone marrow macrophages, receptor activator nuclear factor-κ ligand (RANKL) and C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) expression. Treatment with miR-29a precursor improved the ovariectomy-mediated skeletal deterioration and biomechanical property loss. Mechanistically, miR-29a inhibited RANKL secretion in osteoblasts through binding to 3′-UTR of RANKL. It also suppressed the histone acetyltransferase PCAF-mediated acetylation of lysine 27 in histone 3 (H3K27ac) and decreased the H3K27ac enrichment in CXCL12 promoters. Taken together, miR-29a signaling in osteogenic cells protects bone tissue from osteoporosis through repressing osteoclast regulators RANKL and CXCL12 to reduce osteoclastogenic differentiation. Arrays of analyses shed new light on the miR-29a regulation of crosstalk between osteogenic and osteoclastogenic cells. We also highlight that increasing miR-29a function in osteoblasts is beneficial for bone anabolism to fend off estrogen deficiency-induced excessive osteoclastic resorption and osteoporosis.
Subject terms: Mechanisms of disease, Osteoporosis
Introduction
Bone mass homeostasis is sophisticatedly integrated by dynamic processes of bone formation and resorption1. Upon deleterious extracellular stresses, excessive bone erosion causes an extremely meager bone mineral density along with a fragile microarchitecture, accelerating the development of osteoporosis. This chronic bone disease overwhelms aged patients’ activity, independence and even survival2,3. With respect to the bone cell function to skeletal metabolism, osteogenic cells are essential to gain mineralized matrices, on the contrary, osteoclasts are responsible for remodeling bone microstructure4. The former also produces a plethora of cytokines and chemokines, like receptor activator nuclear factor-κ ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegrin (OPG), and C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), regulating osteoclast formation and resorption capacity5–7. The molecular events underlying the excessive resorption in osteoporotic bone have been not well elucidated.
MicroRNA act as epigenetic regulators to interfere with mRNA expression through binding the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of the target, and thus change biological activity8. Increasing evidence reveals arrays of microRNA actions to osteoblast function and osteoclast behavior during bone development, degeneration and metastasis. For example, serum miR-22-3p, miR-328-3p and let-7g-5p levels are correlated with osteoporotic fracture in women9. Serum miR-550a-5p, miR-188-3p and miR-382-3p are discriminative signatures for skeletal fracture in menopausal females with diabetes10. In experimental osteoporosis models, mice deficient in miR-188 show minor responses to the age-mediated marrow fat overproduction and bone loss11. Silencing miR-503 ramps up osteoclast formation of CD14-positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells in human, aggravating the development of osteoporosis in ovariectomized mice12. Osteoclast-specific miR-34a knockout mice display severe bone loss along with increased bone resorption, whereas estrogen deficiency-mediated osteoporosis and skin cancer-mediated bone metastasis are compromised in mice overexpressing miR-34a13.
The miR-29 family participates in mineralized matrix production and excessive calcified tissue development. Decreased serum miR-29 levels are correlated with vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women14, whereas increased miR-29 expression is associated with high osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells from human osteoarthritic subchondral bone15, and the development of secondary hyperthyroidism-mediated bone disorder in rats with chronic kidney disease16. Knocking down miR-29a reduces calcified matrix production in vascular smooth muscle cells17. We previously revealed that miR-29a signaling protected skeletal tissue from glucocorticoid excess-induced fatty marrow18. Its biological roles in the development of estrogen deficiency-mediated bone loss remains elusive.
This study aims to utilize osteoblast-specific miR-29a transgenic mice to investigate the miR-29a action to osteoclast formation, verify whether it changes estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss, and elucidate the mechanistic underlying osteoblastic miR-29a regulation of osteoclastogenesis.
Results
miR-29a regulated osteoblast–osteoclast interaction
First, we characterized which role miR-29a may play in osteogenic differentiation. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were transfected with miR-29a precursor or antisense oligonucleotide (miR-29a-AS). Forced miR-29a expression increased the osteogenic marker Runx2 and osteocalcin expression along with upregulated mineralized matrix production as evident from von Kossa staining, whereas knockdown of miR-29a reduced osteogenic activity (Fig. 1a).
Transwell culture systems were adopted to examine whether the miR-29a-modulated osteogenic cells changed osteoclast formation. Bone marrow mesenchymal cells were incubated in the upper wells of transwell plates, bone marrow macrophages were seeded in the lower wells containing M-CSF and RANKL (Fig. 1b). miR-29a-transfected osteogenic cells resulted in a significant decrease in osteoclast differentiation as evident from tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. They also significantly downregulated resorption capacity of osteoclast as fewer pits were formed on bone cortical slices than the scrambled controls. On the contrary, miR-29a-AS-treated osteogenic cells promoted osteoclastogenic differentiation capacity and pit formation of macrophages (Fig. 1c).
Next to cell culture models, ovariectomized mice were utilized to mimic estrogen deficiency-mediated bone loss and test whether miR-29a expression was changed in bone tissue. μCT images revealed sparse trabecular microstructure along with significant decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) at 4 weeks postoperatively (Fig. 1d). Estrogen deficiency also caused significant reductions in miR-29a expression in bone tissue throughout the study period as compared with the sham controls (Fig. 1e).
Osteoblast-specific miR-29a transgenic mice showed high bone mass
The analysis of in vitro models and experimental osteoporosis prompted us to breed transgenic mice overexpressing miR-29a in osteoblasts driven by osteocalcin promoter (miR-29aTg/OCN). RT-quantitative PCR confirmed that miR-29a expression in skeleton rather than other tissues was significantly increased in miR-29aTg/OCN mice as compared with WT mice (Fig. 2a). In 7-day-old miR-29aTg/OCN mice, macroscopic morphology, like the skull, chest cage spine and long bone, was similar to WT mice as evident from whole-mount staining (Fig. 2b). At 8 weeks old, significantly increased serum osteocalcin levels and reduced serum TRAP5b abundances (Fig. 2c) along with intensive osteoblast growth histology as evident from proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunostaining (Fig. 2d) occurred in miR-29aTg/OCN mice. Fluorescent calcein accumulation, mineral acquisition rate and femur length of miR-29aTg/OCN mice were also significantly higher than WT mice (Fig. 2e). In addition, miR-29a overexpression significantly augmented cortical BMD (Fig. 2f) and trabecular BMD of femurs (Fig. 2g) and L1–L5 vertebrae (Fig. 2h) along with increased BV/TV and cortical thickness (Ct.Th) as evident from μCT analyses.
miR-29a attenuated the ovariectomy-induced bone mass and biomechanics loss
Given that miR-29a overexpression increased bone formation, we further tested whether it changed estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis. Body weight of ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice was less than ovariectomized WT mice by 2 weeks postoperatively (Fig. 3a). Bone tissue in ovariectomized WT mice showed sparse trabecular microstructure, whereas abundant trabecular bone existed in ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice (Fig. 3b). miR-29a overexpression significantly compromised the estrogen deficiency-mediated loss of BMD (Fig. 3c) and morphometric characteristics of trabecular bone, like bone area (Fig. 3d), B.Ar/T.Ar (Fig. 3e), Tb.Th (Fig. 3f), Tb.N (Fig. 3g) and connectivity (Fig. 3h). It also reduced the ovariectomy aggravation of Tb.Sp (Fig. 3i) and SMI (Fig. 3j).
We performed material tests to characterize mechanical properties of bone tissue (Fig. 3k). Maximum force (Fig. 3l) and breaking force (Fig. 3m) of femurs were significantly reduced in ovariectomized WT mice. miR-29a overexpression significantly increased the baseline mechanical properties and compromised the estrogen deficiency-mediated loss of biomechanical profiles.
miR-29a increased bone formation and attenuated osteoclastic resorption
In addition, bone tissue in ovariectomized WT mice showed histopathological features of severe trabecular loss (Fig. 4a) along with reduced bone mineral accretion (Fig. 4b) and decreased osteoblast number (Ob.N; Fig. 4c), but exhibited increased osteoclast number (Oc.N; Fig. 4d) as compared with sham controls. The estrogen deficiency-induced loss of trabecular histology and high osteoclast distribution were attenuated in ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice.
The improved bone formation and resorption in ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice reasoned us to test osteogenic and osteoclastogenic differentiation capacity in osteoporotic bone. Primary mesenchymal cells and macrophages from bone marrow were isolated and incubated in osteogenic and osteoclastogenic media, respectively. Consistent with the histological analyses, miR-29a overexpression significantly attenuated the estrogen deficiency-mediated loss of mineralized matrix accumulation (Fig. 4e) and decreased osteogenic markers Runx2 and osteocalcin expression (Fig. 4f) of bone marrow mesenchymal cells. It also significantly repressed osteoclast formation of bone marrow macrophages from ovariectomized mice (Fig. 4g).
miR-29a precursor ameliorated osteoporosis development
Given that bone loss was improved in ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice, we further asked whether treatment with miR-29a precursor affected the estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis. To this end, lentivirus miR-29a precursor was injected into ovariectomized mice. It significantly compromised the severity of trabecular microarchitecture loss (Fig. 5a), reversed BMD, BV/TV, and Tb.Th (Fig. 5b) along with improved mechanical properties, including maximum force (Fig. 5c) and breaking force, (Fig. 5d) of skeletons in ovariectomized mice. Injection of miR-29a precursor also retained mineral accumulation (Fig. 5e), but downregulated the ovariectomy-mediated excessive osteoclast-formation histopathology (Fig. 5f).
miR-29a inhibited expression of pro-osteoclast regulators in osteoblasts
As a low osteoclast-formation reaction occurred in miR-29aTg/OCN mice, we wondered whether miR-29aTg/OCN bone marrow osteogenic cells affected these activities. Analysis of co-culture models (Fig. 6a) confirmed an increase in mineralized matrix formation of miR-29aTg/OCN bone marrow mesenchymal cells, which resulted in significant reductions in osteoclast differentiation and pit formation of WT bone marrow macrophages (Fig. 6b, c). These investigations prompted us to further quantify osteoclastogenic precursor cells in bone marrow in these mice. CD14-postive macrophages were significantly increased in miR-29aTg/OCN mice (Fig. 6d), whereas monocytes positive for CD11b and CD115 in bone marrow nucleated cells were comparable with WT mice (Fig. 6e), which is indicative of miR-29a may block osteoclastogenic differentiation reaction.
miR-29a inhibited RANKL and CXCL12 expression in osteoblasts
We investigated how miR-29a regulated osteoblasts to reduce osteoclast formation. RANKL and CXCL12 produced by osteogenic cells are important factors controlling osteoclast differentiation5,7. Significantly increased RANKL and CXCL12 expression of bone marrow mesenchymal cells occurred in ovariectomized WT mice. Of note, the expression of these two osteoclastogenic factors was compromised in ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice (Fig. 7a).
Bioinformatics shows that RANKL is a putative target of the miR-29 family (www.TargetScanHuman.org/vert_71/). In this study, forced miR-29a expression significantly decreased 3′-UTR luciferase activity (Fig. 7b), mRNA and protein expression of RANKL (Fig. 7c), whereas the luciferase reporter activity and RANKL expression were upregulated upon knocking down miR-29a in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell cultures (Fig. 7b, c). miR-29a did not significantly change the luciferase activity of 3′-UTR mutate, which is suggestive of that this microRNA directly targeted RANKL mRNA.
miR-29a is shown to alter the acetylation status of histones in various cell types19–21. In bone marrow mesenchymal cells, the abundances of histone acetyltransferase PCAF and acetylated lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27ac) rather than H3K9ac levels were decreased in miR-29aTg/OCN mice (Fig. 7d). miR-29a overexpression also downregulated the H3K27ac enrichment in CXCL12 promoters as evident from chromatin immunoprecipitation–PCR assay (Fig. 7e). Forced PCAF expression reversed the miR-29a-induced H3K27ac loss, but increased RANKL expression (Fig. 7f). It also increased the H3K27ac occupancy in CXCL12 promoters, as well as increased CXCL12 along with augmented RANKL expression in bone marrow mesenchymal cells (Fig. 7g).
Discussion
Excessive bone turnover is a notable feature of osteoporotic skeletons as resorption activity is far more than osteoblastic bone mineral gain in skeletal tissue22,23. A dysregulated interaction between bone-forming cells and skeleton-resorbing cells is known to impede bone mass homeostasis24. For example, osteoblasts and osteocytes in osteoporotic bone in aged or ovariectomized mice overproduce FasL25, connexin-43 and osteoclastogenic factors26, which enhance osteoclast differentiation and activation. Osteoclasts secrete extracellular matrices27 and exosomal microRNA adverse to osteoblast differentiation and bone formation28. The epigenetic pathways underlying the osteoblast regulation of osteoclast behavior during osteoporotic skeleton development is poorly understood. This study is the first indication that reveals the inhibitory action of miR-29a in osteogenic cells to excessive bone remodeling and osteoporosis development. It repressed the H3K27ac-mediated RANKL and CXCL12 expression, resulting in a low osteoclastic activity. Investigations also highlight the perspective of miR-29a precursor treatment protective against osteoporotic diseases.
In this study, miR-29a is indispensable in osteoblast differentiation because knocking down this molecule decreased osteogenic maker expression and mineralized matrix formation below the baseline. On the other hand, a low miR-29a expression occurred in mice with estrogen deficiency-mediated bone loss, which also hinted the relevance of this microRNA to skeletal integrity. Analyses were in agreement with other groups showing that the miR-29 family is advantageous to osteoblast function and mineralized matrix synthesis15,18,29. The profound phenotypes of high bone mass, trabecular microstructure, and mineral acquisition rate in osteoblast-specific miR-29aTg/OCN mice also consolidated the manifestation that this microRNA has positive effects on bone formation and skeletal development.
However, still little known is what miR-29a signaling in osteoblasts may contribute to osteoclastogenic differentiation capacity. It was noteworthy that osteoclast differentiation and eroded pit formation were downregulated as bone marrow macrophages were co-incubated with miR-29a-transferred osteogenic cells, which was suggestive of an inhibitory action to osteoclasts. The function of miR-29 to osteoclast behavior appears to depend on the incubation conditions. For example, other groups report that knocking down miR-29 expression in bone marrow macrophages and murine RAW264.1 monocytic cells decreases osteoclast differentiation and actin ring formation30. Analysis of this study uncovered high osteoclast lineage specification of bone marrow macrophages upon co-incubating with osteogenic cells lacking miR-29a. Low osteoclast surface histology and decreased ex vivo osteoclast formation of bone marrow macrophages in miR-29aTg/OCN mice further underpinned the outlook for the miR-29a repression of osteoclasts. Investigations also indicated the complex nature of bone cell behavior in skeletal microenvironment.
Striking findings were that a plethora of estrogen deficiency-induced osteoporosis signs, like bone mass loss, porous trabecular microstructure and weak biomechanical properties, were effectively compromised in osteoblast-specific miR-29Tg/OCN mice, which is suggestive of an osteoporosis-inhibitory effect occurred in miR-29Tg/OCN mice. Consistent with the investigations of ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice, treatment with miR-29a precursor also enabled ovariectomized mice to retain bone mineral density and mechanical strength, delaying the progression of osteoporosis. In addition, miR-29aTg/OCN osteogenic cells inhibited WT macrophage precursor cells differentiating into osteoclasts, which was indicative of that miR-29a shielded skeletal tissue from excessive bone turnover. The miR-29a improvement of bone formation and resorption reactions prompted us to understand how miR-29a signaling modulated the interaction between osteoblasts and osteoclasts within the skeletal microenvironment.
Bone marrow macrophages31 along with osteoclastogenic factors32 contribute to osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in various physiological and pathological statuses. In this study, an intricate nature of osteoclast behavior in miR-29aTg/OCN mice was that these animals had increased bone marrow CD14 + macrophages, which elicited a low osteoclast-formation capacity. Thus, we hypothesized that deregulated osteoclastogenic factor production may lead to a low osteoclast differentiation reaction in miR-29aTg/OCN mice. RANKL, OPG33, CXCL934, and CXCL1235 secreted by osteogenic cells are shown to promote macrophages progressing toward osteoclastic cells. Of interest, RANKL and CXCL12 in bone marrow mesenchymal cells were decreased in miR-29aTg/OCN mice, which was suggestive of that miR-29a suppressed osteoclastogenic factor production, hindering macrophage differentiation into osteoclastic cells in skeletal environment. Analysis conveyed a new insight into molecular events by which miR-29a repressed osteoclast formation.
This study shed light on two different intracellular pathways participating in the miR-29a regulation of RANKL and CXCL12 expression in osteoblasts. A canonical pathway was that miR-29a targeted the 3′-UTR region of RANKL and resulted in RANKL underproduction. On the other hand, the acetylation state of histone assembly regulated by histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase is known to alter CXCL12 transcription in osteoblasts and synovial fibroblasts36–38. PCAF signaling is found to regulate the acetylation status of CXCL12 promoter39 and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell cultures40. Our study further uncovered a noncanonical pathway that miR-29a inhibition of PCAF interfered with CXCL12 expression through H3K27 hypoacetylation and thus downregulated the H3K27ac occupancy in CXCL12 promoter in osteoblast cultures. We do not rule out the possibility that miR-29a overexpression may change other signaling transduction, which decreases osteoclastogenic factor expression in osteoblasts or RANKL expression in osteocytes. The miR-29a inhibition of multiple osteoclastogenic factors in osteoblasts underscores its beneficial action to skeletal tissue integrity.
Taken together, miR-29a signaling in osteoblasts is involved in orchestrating bone acquisition and erosion. It enhances osteogenic differentiation and bone formation, as well as targets RANKL and represses the H3K27ac-mediated CXCL12 expression, sustaining bone mass homeostasis (Fig. 8a). Estrogen deficiency induces miR-29a loss, which causes RANKL and CXCL12 overproduction to exaggerate osteoclastic resorption and ultimately provokes osteoporosis (Fig. 8b). This study offers productive insight into the biological roles of miR-29a in the interplay between osteoblasts and osteoclasts and reveals the remedial potential of miR-29a for improving osteoporotic disorders.
Materials and methods
Cell cultures
Animal use protocols were followed the animal well-being guidelines and approved by IACUC of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Affidavit No. 2014120401). Eight-week-old male C57L/B6 mice were euthanatized, femurs and tibiae were dissected. Primary bone marrow mesenchymal cells and macrophage precursor cells were, respectively, isolated and incubated in basal medium containing DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum as previously described18. In some experiments, GIBCO®-C57BL/6 immortalized murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. were maintained in the basal medium.
In vitro osteogenic differentiation
Primary bone marrow mesenchymal cells (105 cells/well) were grown in an osteogenic condition. Briefly, cell cultures were seeded in 12-well plates containing the basal medium, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid and 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, and incubated in a humidified incubator at 37 °C, 5% O2 for 18 days. The osteogenic medium in each well was changed every 3 days. Upon incubation, mineralized matrix in cell cultures was probed using von Kossa-staining protocol. Three fields in each well and three wells in each specimen were selected to measure the matrix area (μm2/field) using microscopy along with an image analysis software (Zeiss)41.
In vitro osteoclast and pit formation
Primary bone marrow macrophages were isolated, as previously described41. In brief, bone marrow nucleated cells were incubated in α-MEM, 10% FBS, and 20 ng/ml M-CSF for 1 day and then collected the floating cells. The non-adherent cells (2 × 104 cells/well) were further incubated in a basal medium with 40 ng/ml RANKL and 20 ng/ml M-CSF (R&D Systems) for 10 days. Osteoclasts were detected using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining. For pit-formation assay, macrophages were seeded onto bovine cortical bone slices (Boneslices.com) and incubated in the osteoclastogenic medium. After incubation, bone slices were rinsed with 1 M ammonium chloride and followed by 0.5% toluidine blue staining, as previously described42. Osteoclast number and pit area in three random fields of each specimen were quantified.
Transwell co-culture
Transwell culture kits (Corning® HTS 24-well plates, 0.4 μm, Thomas Scientific) were employed. In total, 2 × 104/well bone marrow macrophages were seeded onto the lower wells containing the osteoclastogenic medium, 2 × 104 bone marrow mesenchymal cells were incubated in the upper wells containing the osteogenic medium for 10 days. After incubation, osteoclast formation in the lower wells were subjected to tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining.
In vitro transfection
In total, 1 × 106 bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (12-well plates; GIBCO®-C57BL/6 immortalized) were incubated in the basal medium and transferred with 25 nM miR-29a precursor, antisense oligonucleotide, or scrambled control (Applied Biosystems Inc, Foster City, CA) using LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s manuals. The transfected cell cultures were incubated in the osteogenic medium for 18 days. In some experiments, cell cultures were transfected with expression vectors coding PCAF or empty vectors.
Osteoblast-specific miR-29aTg/OCN mice
C57L/B6 mice overexpressing human miR-29a precursor transcribed by the osteoblast marker osteocalcin promoter were bred15. Their genotype expressing a 506-bp construct in genomic DNA isolated from tail tips was confirmed using primers (forward, 5′-GAGGATCCCCTCAAGGATACCAAGGGATGAAT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTTCTAGAAGGAGTGTTTCTAGGTATCCGTCA-3′). Wild-type mice were littermates that did not express the construct of interest.
Ovariectomized-induced osteoporosis
Twelve-week-old female miR-29aTg/OCN mice (n = 8) and wild-type mice (n = 8) were anesthetized, bilateral ovariectomy was performed with an aseptic surgery. For sham controls, miR-29aTg/OCN mice (n = 8) and wild-type mice (n = 8) received surgery without removing ovaries. Each animal was intraperitoneally given 25 μg/ml calcein to label mineral acquisition status at 3 and 9 days before euthanasia. At 4 weeks postoperatively, animals were euthanatized, tibiae and femurs were dissected for μCT scanning, biomechanics, and histological examination.
In vivo lentivirus miR-29 precursor treatment
Lentivirus particles for pMIF-cGFP-zeo expressing miR-29a precursor were prepared and titrated to 1 × 107/μl infectious units, as previously described43. At 1 week postoperatively, 100 μl lentivirus particle suspensions or vehicle were injected into ovariectomized mice via tail veins. Eighteen ovariectomized mice were divided into three groups to receive miR-29a precursor (n = 6), mock (n = 6), and vehicle (n = 6). Mice received sham operation were designated as sham controls (n = 6). At 4 weeks after ovariectomy, animals were euthanatized, bone tissue was dissected for studies.
μCT analysis
The radiographic image (9-μm voxel size) acquisition and reconstruction of microstructure of proximal tibiae and L1–L5 lumbar vertebrae were performed with the μCT system (SkyScan 1176, Bruker) along with SKYSCAN® CT-Analysis software. The trabecular and cortical morphometry of the region of interest (300 slices of images), including BMD (g/cm3), BV/TV (%), B.Ar/T.Ar (%), Tb.Th (mm), Tb.N, connectivity (mm2), Tb.Sp (mm), SMI, and Ct.Th (mm), were measured according to the manufacturer’s manuals.
Biomechanical property assay
Three-point bending assessment of femurs were performed using SHIMADZU EZ-SX Material Test System (Shimadzu Corporation) as a 50-N load was displaced (10 mm/min) and loaded to the specimens, which were hold onto 6-mm jag span holders. Displacement profile, breaking force (N), and maximum force (N) of specimens were computed using TRAPEZIVMX software.
Histomorphometry
Fluorescent calcein accumulation and trabecular bone histology in methyl acrylate-embedded tibiae were probed using fluorescence microscopy and von Kossa staining, respectively. In some experiments, osteoclasts and osteoblasts in sections of decalcified specimens were probed using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase staining, respectively. Mineral acquisition rate (μm/day), trabecular bone histology (BV/TV, %), osteoclast number (Oc.N/mm), and osteoblast number (Ob.N/mm) were measured using Zeiss image analysis software. Three random fields in each section, three sections of each mouse, and six animals were randomly selected for analysis.
RT-quantitative PCR
Trizol regent and ReadScript® Two-Step cDNA Synthesis Kits (Sigma-Aldrich) were utilized to extract the total RNA from 106 cell cultures and reversely transcribe 1 μg total RNA, respectively. mRNA of interest was probed using the ABI 7900 Detection System (Applied Biosystems), 2 × TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix along with primers for Runx2, osteocalcin, RANKL, CXCL12, and actin (Supplementary Table 1). The threshold value (Ct) of each gene was computed automatically. Fold change of mRNA expression was calculated according to the equation, 2-ΔΔCt, as previously described42. In some experiments, miR-29a and U6 expression in specimens was probed using primers (Ambion), SYBR Green FastMix reagent, and ABI 7900 Detection System (Applied Biosystems).
Flow cytometry
Bone marrow in tibiae and femurs were aspirated from miR-29aTg/OCN mice and wild-type mice after euthanasia, mixed with ammonium–chloride–potassium buffer to isolate nucleated cells. Macrophages in 106 bone marrow nucleated cells were probed with CD14 antibody conjugated with PE along with CytoFix/CytoPerm Kits (BD Biosciences) and quantified using flow cytometry (BD Accuri C6, San Jose, CA, USA). In a subset experiment, monocytes were probed with CD11 antibody conjugated with PE and CD115 antibody conjugated with allophycocyanin. Cells probed with IgE-conjugated or allophycocyanin were designated as isotype controls.
Luciferase reporter assay
Luciferase reporter pCRII-TOPO II (Invitrogen) containing wild-type (5′-AUUGGCUAAAGU CUACCACGAU-3′; NM_001038495.1) and 4-base pair mutant (5′-AGACATATT TCAACTGAATAAC-3′) 3′-UTR of RANKL were constructed, respectively. In total, 104 bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in each well (96-well plates) were transfected with 10 ng luciferase reporter along with 10 ng Renilla luciferase reporter (Invitrogen). In all, 30 nM miR-29a precursor, antisense oligonucleotide and scrambled control were further transfected into the cell cultures. Detection of luciferase activity normalized with Renilla luciferase reaction was performed using Dual Luciferase Detection Kits (Promega) along with fluorescence spectrophotometer.
Western blotting
PCAF, H3K9ac, H3K27ac, and actin abundances in cell lysates isolated from 5 × 106 cells were detected with immunoblotting protocols probed by respective primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Proteins of interest on the blots were visualized using IgG-conjugated horseradish peroxidase along with LumiGLO® chemiluminescent agent and H2O2 (Cell Signaling Technology).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR
H3H27ac immunoprecipitates in 107 cells were isolated using H3K27ac antibody and IgG together with Megna ChIP™ A/G Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) kits (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA). The immunocomplexes were further processed with proteinase K and sonication to extract DNA. In all, 1 ng DNA specimen was subjected to PCR analysis using Cy3-conjuated probes (Supplementary Table 1) for the -1991~+ 8 bp region proximal to CXCL12 promoter (ENSMUSG00000061353), respectively. PCR assay of GADPH promoter (ENSMUSG00000207654) was designated as positive controls. H3K27ac enrichment to the promoter of interest was expressed as % input DNA.
Statistical analysis
Investigations among sham wild-type mice, ovariectomized wild-type mice, sham miR-29aTg/OCN mice, and ovariectomized miR-29aTg/OCN mice were analyzed using an ANOVA test and followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test. Statistical difference was reached as P-value < 0.05.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by [MOST-104-2314-B-182A-006-MY3] from Ministry of Science & Technology, Taiwan, [NHRI-EX108-10736SI] from the National Health Research Institute, and [CMRPG8H0111] from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. We are grateful for Core Laboratory for Animal Phenomics & Diagnostic and Center for Laboratory Animals, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for the use of facilities.
Authors’ contributions
Study conception and design: W.-S.L., J.-Y.K., Y.-S.C., H.-C.K., C.-K.H., C.-W.K., S.-Y.W., B.-W.H., J.-G.T. and F.-S.W.; acquisition of the data: W.-S.L., Y.-S.C., H.-C.K., C.-K.H., C.-W.K. and S.-Y.W.; analysis and interpretation of the data: W.-S.L., J.-Y.K., B.-W.H., J.-G.T. and F.-S.W.; article drafting and revision: W.-S.L., J.-Y.K., B.-W.H., J.-G.T. and F.-S.W.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by M. Kaartinen
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Wei-Shiung Lian, Jih-Yang Ko
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41419-019-1942-1).
References
- 1.Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:254–262. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:898–907. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Saag KG, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1417–1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fan Y, et al. Parathyroid hormone directs bone marrow mesenchymal cell fate. Cell Metab. 2017;25:661–672. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393:364–376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Drake MT, Clarke BL, Oursler MJ, Khosla S. Cathepsin K inhibitors for osteoporosis: biology, potential clinical utility, and lessons learned. Endocr. Rev. 2017;38:325–350. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim BJ, Koh JM. Coupling factors involved in preserving bone balance. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018;76:1243–1253. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2981-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vicente R, Noël D, Pers YM, Apparally F, Jorgensen C. Deregulation and therapeutic potential of microRNAs in arthritic disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:211–220. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weilner S, et al. Differentially circulating miRNAs after recent osteoporotic fractures can influence osteogenic differentiation. Bone. 2015;79:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Heilmeier U, et al. Serum miRNA signatures are indicative of skeletal fractures in postmenopausal women with and without type 2 diabetes and influence osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:2173–2192. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li CJ, et al. MicroRNA-188 regulates age-related switch between osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:1509–15022. doi: 10.1172/JCI77716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen C, et al. MiR-503 regulates osteoclastogenesis via targeting RANK. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:338–347. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Krzeszinski JY, et al. miR-34a blocks osteoporosis and bone metastasis by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and Tgif2. Nature. 2014;512:431–435. doi: 10.1038/nature13375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 14.Yavropoulou MP, et al. Expression of microRNAs that regulate bone turnover in the serum of postmenopausal women with low bone mass and vertebral fractures. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2017;176:169–176. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-0583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lian Wei-Shiung, Wu Ren-Wen, Lee Mel S., Chen Yu-Shan, Sun Yi-Chih, Wu Shing-Long, Ke Huei-Jing, Ko Jih-Yang, Wang Feng-Sheng. Subchondral mesenchymal stem cells from osteoarthritic knees display high osteogenic differentiation capacity through microRNA-29a regulation of HDAC4. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2017;95(12):1327–1340. doi: 10.1007/s00109-017-1583-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shilo V, et al. Let-7 and MicroRNA-148 regulate parathyroid hormone levels in secondary hyperparathyroidism. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;28:2353–2363. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016050585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Du Y, et al. Upregulation of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-7 by miR-29 repression mediates vascular smooth muscle calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012;32:2580–2588. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ko JY, et al. MicroRNA-29a mitigates glucocorticoid induction of bone loss and fatty marrow by rescuing Runx2 acetylation. Bone. 2015;81:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lin CL, et al. MicroRNA-29a promotion of nephrin acetylation ameliorates hyperglycemia-induced podocyte dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014;25:1698–1709. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013050527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khalil W, et al. Pathologic regulation of collagen I by an aberrant protein phosphatase 2A/histone deacetylase C4/microRNA-29 signaling axis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibroblasts. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015;53:391–399. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0150OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang X, et al. Coordinated silencing of MYC-mediated miR-29 by HDAC3 and EZH2 as a therapeutic target of histone modification in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:506–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 22.Luo J, et al. LGR4 is a receptor for RANKL and negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Nat. Med. 2016;22:539–546. doi: 10.1038/nm.4076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hendrickx, G., Boudin, E., & Van Hul, W. A look behind the scenes: the risk and pathogenesis of primary osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11, 462–474 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Furuya M, et al. Direct cell-cell contact between osteoblasts and osteoclasts dynamically controls their functions in vivo. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:300. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02541-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen X, et al. Osteoblast-osteoclast interactions. Connect Tissue Res. 2018;59:99–107. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2017.1290085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Davis HM, et al. Disruption of the Cx43/miR21 pathway leads to osteocyte apoptosis and increased osteoclastogenesis with aging. Aging Cell. 2017;16:551–563. doi: 10.1111/acel.12586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Y, Wei L, Miron RJ, Shi B, Bian Z. Anabolic bone formation via ssite-specific bone-targeting delivery system by interfering with semaphorin 4D expression. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015;30:286–296. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li D, et al. Osteoclast-derived exosomal miR-214-3p inhibits osteoblastic bone formation. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10872. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Roberto VP, Tiago DM, Silva. IA, Cancela ML. MiR-29a is an enhancer of mineral deposition in bone-derived systems. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014;564:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Franceschetti T, Kessler CB, Lee SK, Delany A. M. miR-29 promotes murine osteoclastogenesis by regulating osteoclast commitment and migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:33347–33360. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.484568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sinder BP, Pettit AR, McCauley LK. Macrophages: their emerging roles in bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015;30:2140–2149. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Okamoto K, et al. Osteoimmunology: the concept framework unifying the immune and skeletal systems. Physiol. Rev. 2017;97:1295–1349. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koide M, et al. Bone formation is coupled to resorption via suppression of sclerostin expression by osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:2074–2086. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sucur. A, et al. Chemokine signals are crucial for enhanced homing and differentiation of circulating osteoclast progenitor cells. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;19:142. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1337-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shahnazari M, Chu V, Wronski TJ, Nissenson RA, Halloran BP. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in the osteoblast regulates the mesenchymal stem cell and osteoclast lineage populations. FASEB J. 2013;27:3505–3513. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-225763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Angiolilli C, et al. Inflammatory cytokines epigenetically regulate rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocyte activation by suppressing HDAC5 expression. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016;75:430–438. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kremer KN, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors target the leukemic microenvironment by enhancing a Nherf1-protein phosphatase 1α-TAZ signaling pathway in osteoblasts. J. Bio. l Chem. 2015;290:29478–29492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.668160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Angiolilli C, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 regulates the inflammatory gene expression programme of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:277–285. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Romain B, et al. Histone hypoacetylation contributes to CXCL12 downregulation in colon cancer: impact on tumor growth and cell migration. Oncotarget. 2017;8:38351–38366. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang P, et al. Histone H3K9 acetyltransferase PCAF is essential for osteogenic differentiation through bone morphogenetic protein signaling and may be involved in osteoporosis. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2332–2341. doi: 10.1002/stem.2424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lian WS, et al. Chaperonin 60 sustains osteoblast autophagy and counteracts glucocorticoid aggravation of osteoporosis by chaperoning RPTOR. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:938. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0970-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang Y, et al. Amelxanox suppresses osteoclastogenesis and prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:13575. doi: 10.1038/srep13575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ko JY, et al. MicroRNA-29a counteracts synovitis in knee osteoarthritis pathogenesis by targeting VEGF. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:3584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03616-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.