Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2019 Jul 30;18(4):2459–2466. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7826

MicroRNA-34a suppresses the invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells by enhancing EGR1 and inhibiting vimentin

Wei Zhu 1,*, Jia-Li Long 1,*, Yu-Ting Yin 1, Hai-Na Guo 2, En-Ping Jiang 1, Yu-Ling Li 3, Qing-Lian He 1, Chao Zeng 1,✉, Yan-Qin Sun 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6755272  PMID: 31555358

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are small non-coding RNAs that serve a post-transcriptional regulatory role in eukaryotes. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of miR-34a in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues is decreased compared with that in normal colorectal tissues. However, the role of miR-34a in the invasion and metastasis of CRC remains unclear. In the present study, the levels of miR-34a expression were measured in various CRC cell lines. The cells were transfected with miR-34a mimics or inhibitors in order to assess the proliferation rate, and the colony forming, invasive and migratory abilities. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of vimentin and early growth response protein 1 (EGR1) were examined by western blot analysis. The results revealed that the expression of miR-34a was low in SW620, RKO, LoVo and Caco-2 cell lines and high in the SW480 and SW1116 cell lines. The migration, invasion and proliferation levels of SW480 cells were facilitated by decreasing the expression of miR-34a. Transient transfection with miR-34a mimics in SW620 cells caused a notable decrease in cell migration, invasion and proliferation levels compared with the control group, and a downregulation of vimentin and upregulation of EGR1 protein expression. The present study demonstrated that miR-34a was deregulated in a highly invasive CRC cell lines, and that it may attenuate the migratory, invasive and proliferative capabilities of CRC cells by enhancing the expression of EGR1 and inhibiting that of vimentin. The results of the present study represent important progress towards understanding the mechanisms of CRC recurrence and metastasis.

Keywords: microRNA-34a, early growth response protein 1, metastasis, invasion, colorectal cancer

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, accounting for ~1.4 million incident cases and 600,000 mortalities every year (1). The low early diagnosis rate, high recurrence and metastasis rates, and lack of effective treatment are responsible for the CRC-associated mortality statistics (2). Therefore, the identification of the molecular mechanisms involved in the progression of CRC would be useful in providing targets for cancer detection, prevention and therapy, and ultimately improving patient prognosis.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a small non-coding RNA molecules present in plants, animals and certain viruses, and they serve a role in RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression (3,4). In animal cells, the miRNA gene first transcribes a longer primary miRNA in the nucleus, where it is processed by the Drosha enzyme to form a 60–70 nucleotide hairpin precursor miRNA. This is transported to the cytoplasm with the help of the nuclear exportin-5 complex, and cleaved by the Dicer protein to generate a mature miRNA of 18–25 nucleotides. Mature miRNAs and a number of proteins form RNA silencing complexes, which inhibit transcription or translation of the target gene through the activity of sequences complementary to the 3′untranslated region of the target gene mRNA that are contained within the complex (5,6). It has been established that miRNAs are important regulators of apoptosis, cell proliferation and tumorigenesis (7–10).

miR-34a is considered to be a potential tumor suppressor miRNA based on its frequent dysregulation in cancer tissues (11) and its ability to regulate the expression of numerous genes, including NOTCH1, apoptosis regulator BCL2, MYC proto- oncogene, MET proto-oncogene, cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 and CD44 antigen (12–14). miR-34a is frequently downregulated in multiple types of cancer and is an independent prognostic indicator in various types of cancer, including colon, breast, lung and gastric cancer (15–18). In addition, it is significantly downregulated in the serum and tumor tissue in CRC (19,20). However, the exact molecular mechanism of miR-34a in the development of CRC has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, miR-34a was inhibited or overexpressed in CRC cells, revealing that it inhibited cell migration, invasion and proliferation by regulating vimentin and early growth response protein 1 (EGR1).

Materials and methods

Cell lines and culture

Human CRC cell lines SW480, SW620, RKO, LoVo and SW1116 were provided by Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) and grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sera Gold), 100 U/ml penicillin G and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The human CRC Caco-2 cell line and the human colonic epithelial NCM460 cell line were provided by Sun Yat-sen University and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with 10% FBS. The cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Detailed information on cell lines is summarized in Table SI.

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA from the cultured cancer cells was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). cDNA was then synthesized from total RNA or small RNA using the Prime-Script RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) or via the stem-loop method using the miRNA First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The qPCR was performed using 2X SG Fast qPCR Master Mix (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPCR: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and at 60°C for 30 sec. The following primers were utilized for qPCR: miR-34a forward, 5′-CCGCGTGGCAGTGTCTTAGCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-ATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG-3′; U6 forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ (each, Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.). For each case, ≥3 biological replicates were performed. The qPCR analysis was performed on a PikoReal™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The miRNA was quantified with the 2−ΔΔCq method and normalized against U6 (21).

Oligonucleotide transient transfection

SW480 and SW620 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 3×105 cell per well. Prior to transfection, cells were plated at 70–80% confluence. miR-34a mimic, inhibitor and corresponding negative control were chemically synthesized by Guangzhou RiboBio (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.). The mimic and inhibitor sequences were as follows: miR-34a mimic, 5′-UGGCAGUGUCUUAGCUGGUUGU-3′; control miR-34a mimic, 5′-UUUGUACUACACAAAAGUACUG-3′; miR-34a inhibitor, 5′-ACAACCAGCUAAGACACUGCCA-3′ and control miR-34a inhibitor, 5′-UCACAACCUCCUAGAAAGAGUAGA-3′. The SW620 cells were transfected with 50 nM miR-34a mimic (named miR-34a) or mimic negative control (NC) (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) by nucleofection using Lipofectamine® 3000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and the SW480 cells were transfected with 100 nM miR-34a inhibitor (inmiR-34a) or inhibitor NC, according to the manufacturer's protocol. At 24 h post-transfection, RT-qPCR was performed to verify the transfection efficiency.

Western blot analysis

SW480 and SW620 cells were collected 48 h after the aforementioned transfections. Protein was extracted from cells using a mixture of RIPA lysate (Beyotime Institute of Technology), PMSF (Beyotime Institute of Technology) and 50× phosphatase inhibitor (Applygen Technologies, Inc.) at a ratio of 100:1:2. Protein concentrations were then quantified using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A total of 40 µg protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (Beyotime Institute of Technology) and subsequently transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck KGaA). The membranes were blocked with low-fat milk (5%) at room temperature for 1 h, and then incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies against EGR1 (cat. no. 4153; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), vimentin (cat. no. 5741; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and GAPDH (cat. no. 5174; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). Subsequently, the membranes were washed with TBST 3 times and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (cat. no. A0208; 1:1,000; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 1 h at room temperature. Following 3 washes with TBST, the results were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system on a FluorChem R (ProteinSimple). Protein expression was quantified using ImageJ software (version 1.47; National Institutes of Health).

Wound healing assay

SW480 and SW620 cells were cultured in 6-well plate following transfection until the confluence reached 90%. The cell monolayers were scratched with micropipette tips to form a gap. The cell culture surface was washed 3 times with PBS to remove cellular debris and incubated in RPMI-1640 medium with 2% FBS for 48 h. The wound closures were compared at 0 and 48 h. Images were captured using an optical microscope (magnification, ×100; Nikon Corporation) and analyzed with ImageJ software (version 1.47; National Institutes of Health).

Transwell cell migration assay

Following 12 h of transfection, SW480 and SW620 cells were treated with 0.25% trypsin (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) and suspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium at a density of 3×105 cells/ml. A total of 200 µl cell suspension was placed in the top chamber of a 2-chamber Costar Transwell 24-well plates (8-µm pores; Corning Inc.) and 600 µl RPMI-1640 medium containing 15% FBS was added in the lower chamber. The cells were cultured at 37°C for 48 h. The cells on the surface of the upper chamber were swabbed and those under the surface of the lower chamber were stained with crystal violet (0.1%) at room temperature for 20 min. Cell migration was evaluated by counting the cells that had migrated into the filters using an optical microscope (magnification, ×100; Nikon Corporation).

Transwell cell invasion assay

The invasion assay was performed using the aforementioned migration assay protocol, but following the addition of 50 µl BD Matrigel™ (BD Biosciences) into each Transwell upper chamber, which was then placed in a 37°C incubator for 2 h to solidify. The tumor cell invasive capacity was then assessed as aforementioned.

Colony formation assay

Following transfection for 12 h, the SW480 and SW620 cells were transferred to 6-well plates with RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS (300 cells per well). The cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 2 weeks. Subsequently, the cell colonies were fixed with pure methanol for 15 min at room temperature and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min at room temperature, and the colonies were counted.

MTT assay

Following transfection for 12 h, SW480 and SW620 cells in each group were transferred to a 96-well plate and cultured at 37°C, and 5% CO2 for 72 h. The MTT assay was performed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. At each time point, the medium was replaced and 20 µl MTT (5 mg/ml) was added to each well. Following incubation at 37°C for 4 h, the medium was discarded and 150 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was added to each well. The optical density was measured at 490 nm.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc.) and GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. A Student's t-test was used for comparison between two groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-34a is deregulated in highly invasive cells, and may be successfully transfected into SW620 and SW480 cells

RT-qPCR was used to detect the levels of miR-34a in CRC and normal colonic epithelial cells. The expression of miR-34a in highly invasive CRC SW620, RKO and LoVo cell lines is presented in Fig. 1A. The SW620 cell line was derived from a lymph node metastasis of a primary colon tumor, whereas cells from the primary colon tumor in the same patient were used to establish the SW480 cell line. These 2 cell lines were selected for subsequent experiments to observe any notable contrasts. At 24 h post-transfection, RT-qPCR was performed to verify the transfection efficiency. Compared with the equivalent NC group, differences were observed in the levels of relative miR-34a expression following transfection of the inmiR-34a in the SW480 cells (P<0.01; Fig. 1B), and miR-34a mimic into the SW620 cells (P<0.001; Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Expression of miR-34a in CRC cell lines and evaluation of miR-34a mimic and inhibitor transfection efficiency. (A) The expression of miR-34a in 7 cell lines was assessed by RT-qPCR (6 CRC cell lines and NCM460 as the normal control). (B and C) At 24 h post-transfection, RT-qPCR was performed to verify the transfection efficiency. Compared with the equivalent NC group, the expression of miR-34a was (B) significantly decreased in SW480 cells with inmiR-34a and (C) significantly increased in SW620 cells with miR-34a mimic. **P<0.01 and ****P<0.0001 vs. the equivalent NC groups. miR, microRNA; CRC, colorectal cancer; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; NC, negative control; inmiR-34a, miR-34a inhibitor group.

miR-34a suppresses the migration and invasion of CRC cells

The effect of miR-34a on the migratory and invasive abilities of SW480 and SW620 cell was assessed. The migratory ability of the inmiR-34a group was significantly more marked compared with that of the NC group (P<0.001; Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the overexpression of miR-34a in SW620 cells attenuated cell migration (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). The inmiR-34a group of the SW480 cells exhibited a significant increase in cell invasion (P<0.001; Fig. 2C), whereas the increased levels of miR-34a in SW620 cells led to a decrease (P<0.05; Fig. 2D). In addition, the wound healing assay was performed to evaluate the migration of SW480 cells and SW620 cells. Compared with the equivalent control groups, the degree of wound closure was increased in inmiR-34a group (Fig. 3A), and decreased in the SW620 mimic group (Fig. 3B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

miR-34a suppresses the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. The migration and invasion of SW480 and SW620 cells with and without inmiR-34a or miR-34a mimic transfection was examined using Transwell assays. The left panel is comprised of representative cell images at magnification, ×100. The SW480 cells and SW620 cells in 5 randomly selected areas were counted and statistical analyses were performed (right panel). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. (A) The migration of SW480 cells transfected with inmiR-34a and NC. (B) The migration of SW620 cells transfected with miR-34a mimic and NC. (C) The invasion of SW480 cells transfected with inmiR-34a and NC. (D) The invasion of SW620 cells transfected with miR-34a mimic and NC. The cell migratory and invasive abilities of the SW480 inmiR-34a group were significantly increased compared with that of the NC group, and the cell migratory and invasive abilities of the SW620 miR-34a group were significantly decreased compared with that NC group of cells. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. the equivalent NC groups. miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; inmiR-34a, miR-34a inhibitor group.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

miR-34a suppresses the migration of colorectal cancer cells in a wound healing assay. (A) Representative images of the scratch test in SW480 cells transfected with inmiR-34a inhibitor or inhibitor NC at 0 and 48 h. (B) Representative images of the scratch test in SW620 cells transfected with a miR-34a mimic or mimic NC at 0 and 48 h. Scale bar=100 µm. miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; inmiR-34a, miR-34a inhibitor group.

miR-34a inhibits the proliferation of CRC cells

The proliferation of SW480 and SW620 cells following transfection of miR-34a was examined. The results from the MTT assay revealed an increased proliferative ability in the SW480 inmiR-34a group compared with the NC group, whereas a decrease in the proliferation rate was observed in the SW620 cells with miR-34a overexpression (Fig. 4). The colony-formation rate for the SW480 inmiR-34a group was 47.11±2.75%, compared with 27.78±4.41% for the NC group (P<0.05; Fig. 5A). In the SW620 cells, the colony formation rate of miR-34a mimic group was 29.44±4.68%, compared with 45.56±1.98% in the NC group (P<0.05; Fig. 5B). The colony formation ability of the SW480 inmiR-34a and the SW620 NC groups was improved compared with that of the groups to which they were compared, and their colony sizes were larger.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

miR-34a inhibits the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells. Cell proliferation was assessed by an MTT assay following the downregulation of miR-34a in SW480 cells and the overexpression in SW620 cells. The data indicates that miR-34a downregulation increased the cell proliferation rate, whereas miR-34a overexpression led to a decrease in proliferation rate. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. NC at each time point. miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; inmiR-34a, miR-34a inhibitor group; OD, optical density.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

miR-34a inhibits the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells in a colony formation assay. Compared with the equivalent NC groups, the ability of colony formation was (A) increased in the inmiR-34a cells and (B) decreased in the cells with miR-34a overexpression. *P<0.05 vs. NC. miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; inmiR-34a, miR-34a inhibitor group.

miR-34a suppresses the expression of vimentin and increases the expression of EGR1

The results of the western blot analysis revealed that the expression of EGR1 protein was increased in the miR-34a group of SW620 cells compared with the NC group (P<0.05), whereas the expression of vimentin was decreased (P<0.01; Fig. 6A). By contrast, compared with the NC group, the EGR1 level was decreased in the inmiR-34a group of the SW480 cells (P<0.05), and the level of vimentin was increased (P<0.001; Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Western blot analysis of the protein expression of EGR1 and vimentin in SW620 and SW480 cells. (A) The expression of EGR1 was increased in the miR-34a overexpression group, whereas the expression of vimentin was decreased. (B) The expression of EGR1 was decreased in the inmiR-34a group, whereas the expression of vimentin was increased. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. the equivalent NC. EGR1, early growth response protein 1; miR, microRNA; NC, negative control; inmiR-34a, miR-34a inhibitor group.

Discussion

CRC is the third most common cancer worldwide, and its incidence and mortality are increasing globally (2). CRC is a heterogeneous disease; its progression is caused by special genetic alterations. The identification of the molecular mechanisms involved in the progression of CRC would assist in providing targets for cancer prevention and therapy, and improving patient prognosis. The potential tumor suppressor miRNA miR-34a is frequently downregulated in a number of types of cancer (12–14). The results of the present study demonstrated that miR-34a is deregulated in highly invasive CRC cell lines. Increasing the expression of miR-34a in SW620 cells inhibited the cell proliferative, migratory and invasive capabilities of these cells. Furthermore, it suppressed the expression of vimentin and increased the expression of EGR1. The opposite effects were observed when miR-34a was inhibited in SW480 cells.

EGR1 is a 59-kDa zinc finger transcription factor that appears to activate transcription by binding to DNA as a monomer (22). EGR1 is also known to exhibit a tumor suppressor function in a variety of human tumors, including lung and breast cancer, glioblastoma and ovarian cancer (23–25). Furthermore, previous studies have indicated that EGR1 is a direct regulator of at least 4 major suppressors: Transforming growth factor β-1 protein, PTEN, cellular tumor antigen p53 family members and fibronectin, being involved in the regulation of the invasive behavior of cancer cells (26–28). It was also demonstrated that sustained EGR1 expression may lead to preferential inhibition of tumor cell invasion and tumor growth (29). However, few studies have focused on EGR1 in CRC. In the present study, the addition of a miR-34a mimic caused the expression of EGR1 to increase in CRC cell lines. Therefore, EGR1 is considered to be involved in the mechanism of miR-34a in suppressing tumorigenesis and development of CRC. The results from the present study revealed that miR-34a overexpression enhanced EGR1 levels in SW620 cells, whereas inhibition of miR-34a in SW480 cells elicited the opposite effect. However, the mechanism of how EGR1 participates in regulation of the invasion and metastasis of CRC by miR-34a requires additional investigation.

Vimentin, an intermediate silk protein, is involved in cell structure and integrity (30). Previous studies have revealed that it is abnormally expressed in numerous cancer types and that it affects the shape and movement of cancer cells during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process. Therefore, it is considered to be a potential cancer therapeutic target (31–33). The EMT is a biological phenomenon in which epithelial cells lose their epithelial properties and acquire interstitial cell characteristics under certain circumstances (34), and it has been revealed that it is one of the mechanisms of tumor cell invasion and metastasis (35). Notably, vimentin is involved in the EMT (36). A previous study demonstrated that the expression levels of vimentin in paraffin-embedded CRC specimens were significantly increased compared with those in non-tumor adjacent tissues, and that the high vimentin expression is associated with various adverse clinicopathological factors (37). Furthermore, the expression of vimentin in CRC tissues is significantly increased in patients with higher tumor stage, lymph node involvement, liver metastasis and advanced tumor-node-metastasis stages (38). During the previous few years, miR-34a has been revealed to be involved in the EMT regulation and, therefore, to affect the invasion and metastasis of tumors (39). The results of the present study indicate that miR-34a overexpression inhibits the expression of vimentin in SW620 cells, and miR-34a inhibition leads to an increase in vimentin in SW480 cells.

In conclusion, the results of present study support the hypothesis that miR-34a suppresses the cell migration, invasion and proliferation of CRC cells by regulating vimentin and EGR1. This suggests that miR-34a may prove to be a novel molecular target for the treatment of CRC.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data
Supplementary_Data.pdf (26.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81472275, 81702285 and 81702399) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (grant nos. 2014A030313542 and 2017A030313644).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JL, YY and QH performed the experiments. WZ, CZ and YS designed the current study. JL, YS and EJ analyzed the data. JL and WZ wrote the manuscript. HG and YL provided technical assistance and participated in critical revisions of important intellectual content in the manuscript. WZ, JL, EJ and YS revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ung L, Lam AK, Morris DL, Chua TC. Tissue-based biomarkers predicting outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: A review. Clin Transl Oncol. 2014;16:425–435. doi: 10.1007/s12094-013-1154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Meijer HA, Kong YW, Lu WT, Wilczynska A, Spriggs RV, Robinson SW, Godfrey JD, Willis AE, Bushell M. Translational repression and eIF4A2 activity are critical for microRNA-mediated gene regulation. Science. 2013;340:82–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1231197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:259–269. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin S, Gregory RI. MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:321–333. doi: 10.1038/nrc3932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhu J, Zou Z, Nie P, Kou X, Wu B, Wang S, Song Z, He J. Downregulation of microRNA-27b-3p enhances tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer by increasing NR5A2 and CREB1 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2454. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ao X, Nie P, Wu B, Xu W, Zhang T, Wang S, Chang H, Zou Z. Decreased expression of microRNA-17 and microRNA-20b promotes breast cancer resistance to taxol therapy by upregulation of NCOA3. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2463. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tazawa H, Tsuchiya N, Izumiya M, Nakagama H. Tumor-suppressive miR-34a induces senescence-like growth arrest through modulation of the E2F pathway in human colon cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:15472–15477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707351104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rokavec M, Li H, Jiang L, Hermeking H. The p53/miR-34 axis in development and disease. J Mol Cell Biol. 2014;6:214–230. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mju003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Slabáková E, Culig Z, Remšík J, Souček K. Alternative mechanisms of miR-34a regulation in cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3100. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang X, Ai F, Li X, Tian L, Wang X, Shen S, Liu F. MicroRNA-34a suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis by regulating Notch signaling. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:2325–2333. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu J, Wu G, Lv L, Ren YF, Zhang XJ, Xue YF, Li G, Lu X, Sun Z, Tang KF. MicroRNA-34a inhibits migration and invasion of colon cancer cells via targeting to Fra-1. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:519–528. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li L, Yuan L, Luo J, Gao J, Guo J, Xie X. MiR-34a inhibits proliferation and migration of breast cancer through down-regulation of Bcl-2 and SIRT1. Clin Exp Med. 2013;13:109–117. doi: 10.1007/s10238-012-0186-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Franchina T, Amodeo V, Bronte G, Savio G, Ricciardi GR, Picciotto M, Russo A, Giordano A, Adamo V. Circulating miR-22, miR-24 and miR-34a as novel predictive biomarkers to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229:97–99. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cao W, Yang W, Fan R, Li H, Jiang J, Geng M, Jin Y, Wu Y. miR-34a regulates cisplatin-induce gastric cancer cell death by modulating PI3K/AKT/survivin pathway. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:1287–1295. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nugent M, Miller N, Kerin MJ. Circulating miR-34a levels are reduced in colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:947–952. doi: 10.1002/jso.23174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao J, Li N, Dong Y, Li S, Xu L, Li X, Li Y, Li Z, Ng SS, Sung JJ, et al. miR-34a-5p suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34:4142–4152. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu C, Rangnekar VM, Adamson E, Mercola D. Suppression of growth and transformation and induction of apoptosis by EGR-1. Cancer Gene Ther. 1998;5:3–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Calogero A, Arcella A, De Gregorio G, Porcellini A, Mercola D, Liu C, Lombari V, Zani M, Giannini G, Gagliardi FM, et al. The early growth response gene EGR-1 behaves as a suppressor gene that is down-regulated independent of ARF/Mdm2 but not p53 alterations in fresh human gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:2788–2796. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levin WJ, Press MF, Gaynor RB, Sukhatme VP, Boone TC, Reissmann PT, Figlin RA, Holmes EC, Souza LM, Slamon DJ. Expression patterns of immediate early transcription factors in human non-small cell lung cancer. The Lung Cancer Study Group. Oncogene. 1995;11:1261–1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahmed MM. Regulation of radiation-induced apoptosis by early growth response-1 gene in solid tumors. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2004;4:43–52. doi: 10.2174/1568009043481704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Baron V, Adamson ED, Calogero A, Ragona G, Mercola D. The transcription factor Egr1 is a direct regulator of multiple tumor suppressors including TGFbeta1, PTEN, p53, and fibronectin. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006;13:115–124. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Virolle T, Adamson ED, Baron V, Birle D, Mercola D, Mustelin T, de Belle I. The Egr-1 transcription factor directly activates PTEN during irradiation-induced signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:1124–1128. doi: 10.1038/ncb1201-1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Krones-Herzig A, Adamson E, Mercola D. Early growth response 1 protein, an upstream gatekeeper of the p53 tumor suppressor, controls replicative senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3233–3238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2628034100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim SO, Kwon JI, Jeong YK, Kim GY, Kim ND, Choi YH. Induction of Egr-1 is associated with anti-metastatic and anti-invasive ability of beta-lapachone in human hepatocarcinoma cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:2169–2176. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Katsumoto T, Mitsushima A, Kurimura T. The role of the vimentin intermediate filaments in rat 3Y1 cells elucidated by immunoelectron microscopy and computer-graphic reconstruction. Biol Cell. 1990;68:139–146. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(90)90299-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McInroy L, Maatta A. Down-regulation of vimentin expression inhibits carcinoma cell migration and adhesion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;360:109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bargagna-Mohan P, Hamza A, Kim YE, Khuan Abby Ho Y, Mor-Vaknin N, Wendschlag N, Liu J, Evans RM, Markovitz DM, Zhan CG, et al. The tumor inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent withaferin A targets the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Chem Biol. 2007;14:623–634. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Satelli A, Li S. Vimentin in cancer and its potential as a molecular target for cancer therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:3033–3046. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0735-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–196. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nieto MA. Epithelial plasticity: A common theme in embryonic and cancer cells. Science. 2013;342:1234850. doi: 10.1126/science.1234850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wrighton KH. Cell migration: EMT promotes contact inhibition of locomotion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:518. doi: 10.1038/nrm4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xiao S, Liu L, Lu X, Long J, Zhou X, Fang M. The prognostic significance of bromodomain PHD-finger transcription factor in colorectal carcinoma and association with vimentin and E-cadherin. J Cancer Res Clin. 2015;141:1465–1474. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1937-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Toiyama Y, Yasuda H, Saigusa S, Tanaka K, Inoue Y, Goel A, Kusunoki M. Increased expression of Slug and Vimentin as novel predictive biomarkers for lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:2548–2557. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rokavec M, Öner MG, Li H, Jackstadt R, Jiang L, Lodygin D, Kaller M, Horst D, Ziegler PK, Schwitalla S, et al. IL-6R/STAT3/miR-34a feedback loop promotes EMT-mediated colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1853–1867. doi: 10.1172/JCI73531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Data
Supplementary_Data.pdf (26.3KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES